DOCSLIB.ORG

Private Equity Essentials

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Private Equity Essentials PRIVATE EQUITY ESSENTIALS An The vast majority of investors are familiar with one market: a liquid and Introduction public one where prices quickly reflect new data, almost everyone sees the same information, and news spreads in seconds across the global to the Internet. But there is a second, much larger market—the private company Characteristics market—where information is highly inefficient. The lack of transparency and Mechanics in this vast market offers opportunity for investors who are able to of Private access information about private companies and negotiate attractive terms to provide select companies with capital to help them pursue Equity Investing growth strategies and improve their operations. This paper addresses the basic differences between private equity and public investments, such as stocks, bonds and mutual funds. It also explains how private equity fund managers create value, the mechanics of private equity, the fees charged in this asset class, and historical net returns. It describes the traditional institutional profile of PE investors, the various types of private equity strategies, how to think about a PE allocation within a high-net-worth portfolio, and concludes with some final observations for investors considering the asset class for the first time. PRIVATE EQUITY ESSENTIALS Table of KEY CONCEPTS .......................................................... 1 Contents ASSET CLASS CHARACTERISTICS .................................2 FIGURE 1: Public Markets vs. Private Markets ...................2 FIGURE 2: Illiquidity Premium .......................................3 HOW PRIVATE EQUITY MANAGERS CREATE VALUE ........4 FIGURE 3: Main Strategies to Add Value .........................5 CASE STUDY: Dunkin’ Donuts ........................................6 PRIVATE EQUITY MECHANICS ......................................7 FIGURE 4: The J-Curve ................................................8 PRIVATE EQUITY FEES AND DISTRIBUTIONS ..................9 HISTORICAL RETURNS ................................................9 FIGURE 5: Private Equity Returns vs. Public Markets ........10 TRADITIONAL PRIVATE EQUITY INVESTOR BASE ..........10 FIGURE 6: Private Equity Allocation by Investor Type .......11 FIGURE 7: Asset Allocation by Investor Type ...................11 FIGURE 8: Endowment and Foundation Private Equity Allocation Targets .......................................12 THE ENDOWMENT APPROACH TO INVESTING ..............13 FIGURE 9: Endowments: Average 10-Year Net Returns .....13 WHERE PRIVATE EQUITY FITS IN A PORTFOLIO ............13 FIGURE 10: Allocating Across the Liquidity Spectrum ......14 FIGURE 11: PE Program Annual Cash Flows .....................15 INVESTMENT STRATEGIES ..........................................16 HOW TO EVALUATE A PRIVATE EQUITY OPPORTUNITY ..18 FIGURE 12: Interquartile Spreads by Asset Type ..............19 FIGURE 13: Top Performers vs. Bottom Performers ..........19 GETTING STARTED .................................................... 23 KEY CONCEPTS • Private equity investments can add high return potential to a portfolio. On a net basis (after deducting all fees, including carried interest), private equity has outperformed major public indices by 300 basis points (3%) or more over 10, 15 and 20 year periods.1 • A variety of characteristics make private investments different than public investments, creating the potential for greater returns. Three of the most important factors are: • the asymmetry of information in the private markets; • the illiquid nature of private equity; and • the large universe of private companies. • Private equity plays a key role in the portfolios of many large sophisticated investors, including public and private pension plans, insurance companies, foundations, endowments and family offices. • Private equity managers are different from public equity managers in that they actively seek to add value to their portfolio companies. They do this by selecting companies that have the potential for added value and then implementing creative and sometimes aggressive strategies and plans. Importantly, not all private equity managers are the same. Manager skill varies greatly and as a result, the return dispersion within private equity is much greater than in other asset classes. • In evaluating private equity managers, investors should consider: • how the manager seeks to add value; • their track record and relative performance; • the quality of the organization and team; • the investment strategy and market opportunity; • the investment process. • Before allocating to private equity, investors should consider five basic elements: 1) their time horizon; 2) any short term liquidity needs; 3) where the investment fits in their portfolio; 4) their comfort with a relative lack of transparency; and 5) their understanding of fees. • For those who determine private equity is right for them, the asset class can provide high return potential, diversification benefits and uncorrelated invest- ment exposure. 1 Cambridge Associates US Private Equity Index as of September 30, 2016. Past performance is not indicative of future results. 1 | iCapital Network ASSET CLASS CHARACTERISTICS It is important to note at the outset that the private company universe is mag- nitudes larger than the public company market. According to the US Census, there are approximately 6 million companies with employees in the U.S., only about 5,700 of which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange and the NASDAQ combined.1 By comparison, there are nearly 200,000 private compa- nies in the U.S. with annual revenue between $10 million and $1 billion.2 In addition to the size of the market, a variety of characteristics make private investments different than public investments (see Figure 1 for a summary). Two of the most important factors for investors to understand about private equity are: 1) the asymmetry of information; and 2) the illiquid nature of the asset class. FIGURE 1 PUBLIC MARKETS vs. PRIVATE MARKETS Public Private Frequent transactions Infrequent transactions Access to capital More difficult for small companies to Information widely and quickly shared easily access capital Performance generally in line with Asymetric information the markets Performance premium to liquid markets Minority shareholders Hands-on, value-added control investors Publicly listed companies are required by their regulators, namely the SEC, to issue annual reports and make other disclosures which contain extensive information about their finances, key operating metrics and strategies. Quarterly earnings announcements, press releases, and other public disclosures are heavily researched and reported on by Wall Street, and are available almost instantaneously worldwide due to the internet and a 24-hour news cycle. Private markets are much more opaque because, unlike listed companies, pri- vately held companies are not required by law to disclose any information to the public. As a result, it is rare for private companies to release material information about their finances or operations into the public domain. Instead, in the private marketplace, this type of information is confidential and often treated as a “trade secret”. Second, private company investments are far more “illiquid” than public markets where investors of all types can transact instantly online. Private market investors generally transact very infrequently. Opportunities to invest in private companies occur when the existing owners decide to sell a minority or majority stake to monetize their holdings and/or raise capital to grow their businesses. Such events happen infrequently during the life cycle of a private company and, even 1 Fortune, February 2017. 2 National Center for the Middle Market as of Q1 2017. Private Equity ESSENTIALS | 2 when an opportunity to invest arises, prospective investors must be “invited” into a confidential sale process, which very often involves competing bidders. Buying and selling investors must ultimately agree on the value of shares based on confidential information and without the benefit of a public market that con- firms their value. Because private company shares cannot be sold easily or quickly, they are considered “illiquid” assets. Investors expect to be compensated for this illiquidity by receiving higher re- turns relative to other, more liquid asset classes. The longer-term investment horizon of private equity allows companies to pursue aggressive growth plans, restructurings, acquisition campaigns, and other strategies that are sometimes difficult to execute in a public market environment. Moreover, the vast majority of private companies are too small to issue shares in a public offering, and thus private equity provides them with flexible capital that is often otherwise un- available. The long-term nature of private equity investments is part of what allows PE managers to create meaningful value and thereby provide investors with the illiquidity premium they require for locking up their capital. The dynamic between the degree of liquidity and the expected return on invest- ment is fairly intuitive. As Figure 2 shows, the more illiquid the asset, the higher the potential return. For example, the most liquid market in the world (U.S. Treasuries) offers zero illiquidity premium as all investors have the same infor- mation and can transact instantly, while the most illiquid market (venture capi- tal) depends on information shared person to person and negotiated valuations and typically requires a long time for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • John Markland Is a Partner in Dechert’S London Office
    John D. Markland Partner London | 160 Queen Victoria Street, London, UK EC4V 4QQ T +44 20 7184 7887 | F +44 20 7184 7001 [email protected] Services Banking and Financial Institutions > Corporate Finance and Capital Markets > Global Finance > Leveraged Finance > Private Equity > John Markland is a partner in Dechert’s London office. He is co-head of the firm’s global leveraged finance practice and is consistently recognized as one of Europe’s most “highly experienced finance practitioner[s]” Chambers UK (2017). According to The Legal 500 (2018) he is "a true and rare rock star of leveraged finance". In the 2021 edition of Chambers UK, Mr. Markland is described by clients as being “an excellent partner who is very knowledgeable. He is a formidable negotiator and provides invaluable advice around complex mechanics in contractual agreements," as well as being “extremely commercial and pragmatic." He is also ranked and listed as a ‘leading individual’ for acquisition finance in The Legal 500 UK, 2021. Mr. Markland recently won a special commendation in The Legal Business Corporate Team of the Year Awards 2019 for his role in advising South Korea's SK hynix Inc., the single largest investor in the Bain Capital consortium's US$18 billion takeover of Toshiba's memory chip business unit last year, which is still the largest private equity-backed acquisition globally since 2015 (Thomson Reuters). Prior to joining Dechert in November 2016, Mr. Markland was a partner at Kirkland & Ellis for over 12 years. At Kirkland, Mr. Markland founded and led the European debt finance practice, which won the Dow Jones Private Equity News “Finance Team of the Year” Award for Excellence in Advisory Services in Europe and was consistently top-ranked in Chambers.
    [Show full text]
  • Icapital KKR Private Markets Fund
    iCapital KKR Private Markets Fund Q2 2021 Executive Summary • Collaboration between iCapital and KKR to offer accredited investors access to a diversified portfolio of private equity investments sponsored or advised by KKR or an affiliate of KKR via the iCapital KKR Private Markets Fund (“iKF”) • iKF seeks to allocate to secondaries and co-investments, as well as primaries – with diversification across geographies, sectors, and vintage years o iKF‘s current portfolio also provides diversification across 20 GPs, 63 investment interests, and 404 underlying investments • iKF aims to deliver attractive returns with less volatility than public equities1 o iKF has delivered strong risk-adjusted returns since inception • Established in 1976, KKR is a global investment firm with industry-leading investment experience and $252 billion in AUM o At least 80% of iKF’s assets are expected to be allocated to private equity investments sponsored or advised by KKR or an affiliate of KKR • iKF currently expects to focus on 4 key themes: Digital Age, Health & Wellness, Rise of the Global Millennial & Middle Class, and Corporate Carve-outs • Structural benefits of iKF include: o $25,000 investment minimum o A single investment (no capital calls) that provides immediate exposure to private equity o Continuous offering with monthly subscriptions o Enhanced liquidity relative to typical private equity funds o Monthly NAV pricing o 1099 tax reporting 1 Standard deviation is a statistical measure of how consistent returns are over time; a lower standard deviation indicates historically less volatility. Comparisons to the standard deviation of public equity indices may not be relevant because iKF's underlying investments are illiquid and may not receive a market price until the GP sells them, which could require multiple years.
    [Show full text]
  • Icapital KKR Private Markets Fund Executive Summary
    iCapital KKR Private Markets Fund Executive Summary • Collaboration between iCapital and KKR to offer accredited investors innovative access to a diversified portfolio of private equity investments sponsored or advised by KKR or an affiliate of KKR via the iCapital KKR Private Markets Fund (“iKF”) • iKF seeks to allocate to secondary and co-investment opportunities, as well as primary fund commitments – with diversification across geographies, sectors, and vintage years o iKF‘s current portfolio also provides diversification across 19 underlying GPs, 62 underlying funds, and 394 underlying investments • iKF aims to deliver attractive returns with less volatility than public equities o iKF has delivered strong risk-adjusted returns since inception • Established in 1976, KKR is a global investment firm with industry-leading investment experience and $252 billion in AUM o At least 80% of iKF’s assets are expected to be invested in private equity investments sponsored or advised by KKR or an affiliate of KKR • iKF currently expects to focus on 4 key investment themes: Digital Age, Health & Wellness, Rise of the Global Millennial & Middle Class, and Corporate Carve-outs • Structural benefits of iKF include: o $25,000 investment minimum o A single investment (no capital calls) that provides immediate exposure to private equity o Continuous offering with monthly subscriptions o Enhanced liquidity relative to direct private equity funds o Monthly NAV pricing o 1099 tax reporting Diversification does not ensure profit or protect against loss in a positive or declining market. There is no guarantee that any investment will achieve its objectives, generate profits or avoid losses. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
    [Show full text]
  • A Selection of Current LP Attendees
    12TH ANNUAL texas DECEMBER 9-11, 2019 . FAIRMONT HOTEL, DALLAS, TX A selection of Current LP Attendees • 1888 Management LLC • Klase Family • 747 Capital • Mercer Alternatives • Aberdeen Standard Investments • Moelis Asset Management • Adar Advisors • Morgan Stanley Altera Private Access • • Morgan Stanley AIP • Aquinas Companies, LLC • MSF Capital Advisors • Bank of Oklahoma Alternative Investments NEPC, LLC • Barings • • BOKF Alternative Investments Analyst • Neuberger Berman • BPEA Private Equity • Olive Hill Ventures • Brasfield & Gorrie • Pappas Harris Capital • Calibrium • Paul Comstock Partners • Campton Private Equity Advisors • Polaris Advisory • Children’s Health • Private Advisors LLC • Clarkeen Investments LTD • Privos Capital (MFO) Copper Beech Capital • • QIC • Crow Holdings • Salient • Delos Capital Satori Capital • DuPont Capital Management • • Edgewood Ventures • Spur Capital Partners • Edmond de Rothschild Private Equity • Star Mountain Capital • Employees Retirement System of Texas • Texas A&M Foundation • Fikes Family Office • Texas Children’s Hospital Foundation • Fort Washington Capital Partners • Texas Municipal Retirement System • Fort Worth Employees’ Retirement Fund • The Beneficient Company Group • Gatewood Capital Partners • The Meadows Foundation Gordon Hall Investments, LLC • • The Rosewood Corporation • GuideStone • The Texas Family Office Association • Hancock Capital Management Tolleson Wealth Management • Haniford Family Office • • Hicks, Muse, Tate • TruBridge Capital Partners & Furst Private Equity Center
    [Show full text]
  • (Adjusted Capital Asset Pricing Model), 563 Acceptable Risk, 96
    Index Absorption, 40 Assets, 554–555 ACAPM (adjusted capital asset pricing model), fixed, 577–578 563 intangible, 556–557 Acceptable risk, 96 liquidation value of, 64 Accountants, 312–315 replacement, 577 Accounting earnings, 537–538 specialized, 236 Accounting principles, 587–590 Assignment for benefit of creditors (ABC), 339– Accounts receivable: 343, 348 collection of past due, 81 Attorneys. See Counsel discounting, 74–75 Audits, 221 Accounts receivable (A/R) financing, 101–102, Avanir Pharmaceuticals, 365–366 332–335, 356, 357 Accredited investor, 84 Balance sheet, 53, 221, 553–561 Accrual accounting system, 538 analysis of, 17 Accrual revenues, 538 liquidation, 64 Acquisition, reverse, 194–195 Band of Angels, 359 Acquisition company, 194 Bank debt, 162 Acquisitions, 37–41, 252, 542 Bankers, 306–312 case study, 344–347, 378–379, 385–387, Bankruptcy, 258, 336, 341, 348, 386 389–392 Banks. See Commercial banks; Merchant banks reasons for, 37 Barnette, Meg, 374 Adjusted book value, 28 Bartering, 75 Adjusted capital asset pricing model (ACAPM), Basic 7(a) loans, 176–181 563 BATNA (best alternative to a negotiated Advance rates, 105, 107, 109 acquisition), 325 Affirmative covenants, 223, 224, 278, 290 Becker, Michael, 382 Agency costs, 47 Beneficial owners, 19 AIM Market, 195–196 Benefits, employee, 559–560 Alignment, 7–36 Biotechnology industry, 123, 196, 200–201 Allocated costs, 539 Blank check preferred stock, 283 Amortization, 537 Board of directors, 145–146, 276, 303–306 Anderson, Jim, 198–199 managing, 147–151 Angel investments, 83–95 Book, the, 321 case study, 359–361 Bootstrapping, 72–82, 160 groups of, 87–89 Borrowers: latest developments in, 93 financial statements, 220–222 source directory by minimum funding, 400 operations, 222–223 vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Leave You Feeling Ignored
    CDBmagazine.qxp 4/10/2007 3:16 PM Page 1 can leave you :too big feeling ignored. FINDING THE RIGHT FIT IS EVERYTHING when it comes to maximizing the return on your investments. Select a firm that’s too big, and you could lose priority while paying too much for professional tax, audit, and transaction services. Too small, and you could be stuck with advisors who lack the expertise to properly protect your interests. At Virchow Krause, you get a regionally based, globally focused leader with the strengths and services of the largest firms and the personalized attention of the much smaller ones. The right fit. It’s what you should demand. And exactly what we deliver. EXPECT US TO BECOME YOUR MOST VALUED ADVISOR. CALL 248.372.7300 Certified Public Accountants & Consultants www.virchowkrause.com © 2007 Virchow, Krause & Company, LLP DETROIT BUSINESS MAIN 04-23-07 B 18 CDB 4/17/2007 2:46 PM Page 1 GROWING A NEW ECONOMY HelpingHelpingpg BusinessesBusinesses GrowGGrow Women ToT Their Full Potential ■ From Page 16 To Their Full Potential search, women represented 13.8 percent of angel investors in 2006. Nearly 13 percent of entrepreneurs who sought angel capital last From idea to implementation. year were women, and 21.5 percent of them received angel investment, the center says. From start-up through financing. The Kauffman study contends that hav- From a dream to a successful exit. ing fewer women venture capitalists means fewer deals with women-led firms because The experienced attorneys at venture deals often depend on personal con- Fraser Trebilcock Davis & Dunlap, P.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Telegraph Group
    EN Case No COMP/M.3488 – 3i/ The Telegraph Group Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 7(3) Date: 9.6.2004 COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 9.06.2004 C(2004) 202302 PUBLIC VERSION MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 7(3) DECISION To the notifying parties: Dear Sirs, Subject : Case No COMP/M.3488 – 3i/ The Telegraph Group Request of derogation pursuant to Article 7 (3) of Council Regulation No. 139/20041 1. I refer to the letter of Travis Smith Braithwaite of 28 May 2004, requesting, on behalf of 3i Group plc (3i) in advance of notification of a possible future concentration, a derogation from the obligation imposed by Article 7(1) of Council Regulation No. 139/2004 ("the Merger Regulation")2 to suspend the implementation of that concentration until it has been declared compatible with the common market pursuant to a decision under Article 6(1)(b) or Article 8(2) or on the basis of a presumption according to Article 10(6). I refer also to the letter of Veronis Suhler Stevenson dated 4 June 2004 by which VSS requests that it be joined to the above-mentioned request of 3i. 2. The Commission may, upon request, pursuant to Article 7(3) of the Merger Regulation, grant a derogation from the above-mentioned obligation. In taking its decision, the Commission takes into account, inter alia, the effects of the suspension on one or more of the undertakings concerned by the concentration or on a third party, and the threat to competition posed by the concentration.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Corporate Profile
    2010 ANNUAL REPORT CORPORATE PROFILE The Canada Pension Plan Investment Board is a professional investment management organization that invests the assets of the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) not required to pay current benefits. Created by an Act of Parliament in December 1997 as part of the successful CPP reforms, the organization’s mandate is to help sustain the pensions of 17 million CPP contributors and beneficiaries by maximizing retu rns without undue risk of loss. According to the latest report by the Our disclosure policy states: With a mandate from the federal Chief Actuary of Canada, released “Canadians have the right to know and provincial governments, the in October 2009, the CPP, as why, how and where we invest their CPP Investment Board is a Crown constituted, is sustainable Canada Pension Plan money, who corporation accountable to throughout the report’s 75-year makes the investment decisions, Parliament and to the federal and projection period. The report what assets are owned on their provincial finance ministers who indicates that CPP contributions behalf and how the investments are serve as the stewards of the CPP. are expected to exceed annual performing.” This annual report, As an investment management benefits paid until 2021, providing together with our website and organization operating in the private- an 11-year period before a portion quarterly financial results sector investing non-government of the investment income from the disclosures, help to make this assets, it is not a sovereign wealth CPP Investment Board (CPPIB) is information available to Canadians. fund. Several key attributes, including needed to help pay pensions.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Clients and Friends
    Our October Report on M&A in the FinTech, Data and Analytics Industry DEAR CLIENTS AND FRIENDS: It’s a Global Industry – Embrace It The FinTech, Data and Analytics world in which we live is not defined by national borders and neither are we. It always amazes us how many people have difficulty accepting this fairly simple concept. A few recent examples include Deutsche Börse’s acquisition of Axioma (We advised Goldman Sachs on its minority investment in Axioma); the Hong Kong Exchange’s recent (now aborted) attempt to acquire the London Stock Exchange (LSE); LSE’s agreement to acquire Refinitiv and our work advising UK- based StatPro Group (LSE: SOG) on its sale to Confluence Technologies in a $230 million transaction with backing by TA Associates. We’re not focused on advising cross-border buyers and sellers; it’s just that we don’t confine our thinking to within geographic borders. We try hard to think globally. Over the past 17+ years about half of our transactions have been across borders – involving clients and counterparties from 27 countries. I wrote a book on the right way to Win on Wall Street. There is a full chapter devoted to the need to “Seek Foreign Entanglements.” We’re are happy to advise on US-to-US deals if that’s where the market leads us. (We’ve announced six US deals in the past 12 months.) But we’re working on another six that are international – including three that we’ve announced recently: London- based TradingScreen’s sale of a minority interest in its UK-based subsidiary BidFX to the Singapore Exchange (SGX); the sale of P2Sample to Stockholm-based CINT; and the sale of London-based Prequin Solutions to Dynamo (Boston).
    [Show full text]
  • Advisors and Alternative Investments
    RESEARCH Q2 2018 ADVISORS AND ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS Use of alternative investments varies widely depending on the business model of the advisor, but a majority of practitioners share common views on where and why to invest. Private equity funds and hedge funds represent the largest alternative allocations within the modern wealth management portfolio, but interest in direct deals is projected to be higher than both asset types moving forward. IMPORTANT INFORMATION: This material is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended as, and may not be relied on in any manner as legal, tax or investment advice, a recommendation, or as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to purchase or a recommendation of any interest in any fund or security offered by iCapital. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Alternative investments are complex, speculative investment vehicles and are not suitable for all investors. An investment in an alternative investment entails a high degree of risk and no assurance can be given that any alternative investment fund’s investment objectives will be achieved or that investors will receive a return of their capital. The information contained herein is subject to change and is also incomplete. This industry information and its importance is an opinion only and should not be relied upon as the only important information available. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed, and iCapital Network assumes no liability for the information provided. This information is the property of iCapital Network. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • A Nonprofit Model for the New York Times?
    Duke Conference on Nonprofit Media May 4-5, 2009 A Nonprofit Model for The New York Times? Penelope Muse Abernathy Knight Chair, Journalism and Digital Media Economics University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill “Arthur (Sulzberger) Jr. must reinvent the Times just as his great-grandfather did in 1896, using the same tools: a talent for leadership, an idealistic vision leavened by rigorous pragmatism and the nerves of a gambler. He is bolstered by a family that has willingly sacrificed wealth and personal ambition for the sake of the institution that is both their obligation and their glory. Now, his task is to preserve the Times, and all it represents, and pass it on to yet another generation.” The Trust, Susan E. Tifft and Alex S. Jones When the authors of The Trust wrote those concluding words in 1999, The New York Times was one of the newspaper industry’s “Big Three” – along with The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post. All three newspapers were owned by “publicly traded” companies that had established family trusts designed to preserve and protect the journalistic legacies of those institutions. A dual class of stock gave the majority of the voting rights to those trusts. A mere decade later, the Journal and its parent company, Dow Jones, have been subsumed by Rupert Murdoch’s much larger News Corporation, ending a century of independence and stewardship by the Bancroft family. And both the Washington Post and The New York Times have been hit by an economic double whammy crippling the newspaper industry – the worst advertising recession in decades, coupled with the internet’s capacity to wreak destruction on long-standing business models.
    [Show full text]
  • 60 Broad Street, 38Th Floor • New York, NY 10004 (212) 842-6020 • Fax (212) 842-6039 • Info@Petskypr
    60 Broad Street, 38th Floor New York, NY 10004 (212) 842-6020 Fax (212) 842-6039 www.petskyprunier.com [email protected] Contact: Seth Rosenfield Amy LaBan (212) 842-6018 (212) 842-7126 [email protected] [email protected] Seth Rosenfield Joins Investment Bank Petsky Prunier as Managing Director Veteran Investment Banker Focuses on Information Services and Business Media, including Digital Media and Marketing Services September 18, 2012 (New York, NY) – Petsky Prunier is pleased to announce that Seth Rosenfield has joined the firm as a managing director in its New York City office. Mr. Rosenfield has more than 20 years experience in investment banking, private equity investing, and corporate operations and was, most recently, managing director at BMO Capital Markets, where he led the firm’s information services and business media coverage efforts. At Petsky Prunier, Mr. Rosenfield’s investment banking coverage will focus on information services and business media, including digital media and marketing services. While at BMO, he originated nearly $2 billion of transaction value across multiple verticals, including healthcare, hospitality, financial, and real estate, among other industries. “Petsky Prunier’s unique banking platform, with its industry focus coupled with a full-service model executing both traditional sell-side M&A transactions as well as minority equity and alternative financings, is highly complementary to my experience,” noted Seth Rosenfield. “I was also impressed by the firm’s high volume of successfully completed engagements, which was underscored by Petsky Prunier being Bloomberg’s most active middle market investment bank in 2011 for Internet and Advertising transactions and more than 50 deals completed since the beginning of 2010.” Prior to joining BMO in 2006, Seth spent eight years at Veronis Suhler Stevenson (VSS), a leading merchant bank serving the media and information industries.
    [Show full text]