DOCSLIB.ORG

Ranking : Official - 2011/2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ranking : Official - 2011/2012 Ranking : Official - 2011/2012 Event : Senior Weapon : Epée Gender : F 23.10.11 Turku X 29.10.11 Copenhague X 12.11.11 Arhus X 27.11.11 Oslo X 11.12.11 Belgrade X 22.01.12 Stockholm X 11.02.12 Doha X 25.02.12 Budapest X 09.03.12 Barcelone X 23.03.12 St-Maur X 20.04.12 Casablanca X 22.04.12 Wakayama X 04.05.12 Rio de Janeiro X 05.05.12 Antalya X 19.05.12 La Havane X 19.05.12 Split X 09.06.12 Nankin X 15.06.12 Cancun X 15.06.12 Legnano X 16.06.12 Newcastle X 29.06.12 Leipzig X 30.07.12 Londres X Total X 1 SUN Yujie CHN 8 (6) 20 26 39 26 (3) 30 (2) 60 209 2 SHEMYAKINA Yana UKR (2) 12 14 (2) 20 (3) 21 6 14 96 183 3 HEIDEMANN Britta GER 12 (0) 4 30 12 21 8 78 165 4 FIAMINGO Rossella ITA 20 21 (2) 4 32 30 12 42 161 5 GHERMAN Simona ROU (4) 21 26 8 4 6 48 (2) 42 155 6 MAROIU Anca ROU 2 12 (2) 4 (2) 48 39 2 42 149 7 LUO Xiaojuan CHN 14 (3) 14 (4) 21 (4) 12 48 4 12 125 8 SOZANSKA Monika GER 8 6 (2) 4 14 39 30 24 125 9 SHIN A Lam KOR 2 3 (2) (0) 48 8 3 6 54 124 10 LI Na CHN (2) 12 4 (2) 21 (2) 6 39 14 24 120 11 FLESSEL-COLOVIC Laura FRA (4) 12 (4) 20 14 21 21 8 24 120 12 NAVARRIA Mara ITA 32 39 (2) 14 2 12 3 12 114 13 CHOI Injeong KOR (2) 21 8 4 30 (2) 6 21 (4) 24 114 14 BRANZA Ana Maria ROU (4) 12 32 8 14 12 6 (8) 24 108 15 BESBES Sarra TUN 0 (0) 0 48 0 3 4 42 97 16 JUNG Hyojung KOR 26 (3) (4) 8 12 (2) 6 21 8 12 93 17 SIVKOVA Anna RUS 4 8 8 2 21 21 24 88 18 GEROUDET Tiffany SUI 14 (6) 8 14 6 6 12 (2) 24 84 19 LAWRENCE Maya USA 0 (0) (0) 0 2 3 48 2 24 79 20 XU Anqi CHN 8 (3) (4) 8 30 (2) 6 12 14 78 21 SCHALM Sherraine CAN (0) (0) (0) 8 6 (2) 8 12 30 2 12 78 22 KIRPU Erika EST 4 (2) (3) 4 30 (4) 20 3 14 75 23 HURLEY Courtney USA 2 (0) 8 4 14 30 4 12 74 24 SHUTOVA Lyubov RUS 8 8 2 8 6 30 12 74 25 PIEKARSKA Magdalena POL 4 6 20 8 (2) 12 12 (4) 12 74 26 SZASZ Emese HUN (4) 30 8 8 4 6 6 12 74 27 DEL CARRETTO Bianca ITA 8 12 (2) 2 4 21 12 12 71 The points between parenthesis were not taken into account for the ranking 30.08.2012 Page 1 / 22 Ranking : Official - 2011/2012 Event : Senior Weapon : Epée Gender : F 23.10.11 Turku X 29.10.11 Copenhague X 12.11.11 Arhus X 27.11.11 Oslo X 11.12.11 Belgrade X 22.01.12 Stockholm X 11.02.12 Doha X 25.02.12 Budapest X 09.03.12 Barcelone X 23.03.12 St-Maur X 20.04.12 Casablanca X 22.04.12 Wakayama X 04.05.12 Rio de Janeiro X 05.05.12 Antalya X 19.05.12 La Havane X 19.05.12 Split X 09.06.12 Nankin X 15.06.12 Cancun X 15.06.12 Legnano X 16.06.12 Newcastle X 29.06.12 Leipzig X 30.07.12 Londres X Total X 27 DEL CARRETTO Bianca ITA 8 12 (2) 2 4 21 12 12 71 28 EMBRICH Irina EST 4 4 (0) 14 14 6 26 68 29 SAMUELSSON Emma SWE (0) (2) 3 (2) 32 (2) 6 12 6 8 67 30 BEREZA Malgorzata POL (0) 48 2 (0) 2 3 3 4 62 31 NAKANO Nozomi JPN 2 (0) (0) 2 12 (0) 3 30 (0) 12 61 32 NISIMA Maureen FRA (0) 21 (0) 2 20 3 6 8 60 33 JACQUES ANDRE COQUIN FRA 2 2 (2) 2 6 12 32 56 Josephine 34 DINU Loredana ROU 14 3 (0) 2 4 (0) 12 20 55 35 CHOI Eunsook KOR 4 (0) 14 6 4 21 6 55 36 QUONDAMCARLO Francesca ITA 20 (3) 14 4 4 12 (0) 54 37 KOLOBOVA Violetta RUS 2 2 2 8 3 21 12 50 38 HASSANEIN Mona EGY 39 6 45 39 SCANLAN Susie USA 0 12 (0) 0 2 21 4 6 45 40 JIMENEZ LUNA Jesica PAN 0 0 39 39 41 PANTELYEYEVA Kseniya UKR 14 0 (0) 2 3 3 4 12 38 42 KUUSK Kristina EST 3 1 0 6 (0) (0) 6 20 36 43 KRYVYTSKA Olena UKR (0) (0) (0) 2 2 12 6 0 2 12 36 44 CHANG Chialing TPE 4 1 0 (0) (0) (0) 2 21 6 34 45 MOELLHAUSEN Nathalie ITA (0) 6 8 4 4 6 6 34 46 YEUNG Chui Ling HKG 0 (0) 2 6 (0) 2 6 12 (0) 6 34 47 BERGDAHL Johanna SWE (0) (0) 3 4 (0) (2) 3 12 6 4 32 48 LAWRENCE Corinna GBR (1) 2 3 2 (0) (0) 3 6 3 (0) 12 31 49 MANSOURI Maya TUN 30 30 49 MAHDY Ayah EGY 30 30 51 BOSCARELLI Francesca ITA (2) 6 4 4 4 12 (2) 30 52 NELIP Ewa POL (0) 0 4 (0) 8 3 12 2 29 53 DUPLITZER Imke GER 6 2 3 6 0 12 29 The points between parenthesis were not taken into account for the ranking 30.08.2012 Page 2 / 22 Ranking : Official - 2011/2012 Event : Senior Weapon : Epée Gender : F 23.10.11 Turku X 29.10.11 Copenhague X 12.11.11 Arhus X 27.11.11 Oslo X 11.12.11 Belgrade X 22.01.12 Stockholm X 11.02.12 Doha X 25.02.12 Budapest X 09.03.12 Barcelone X 23.03.12 St-Maur X 20.04.12 Casablanca X 22.04.12 Wakayama X 04.05.12 Rio de Janeiro X 05.05.12 Antalya X 19.05.12 La Havane X 19.05.12 Split X 09.06.12 Nankin X 15.06.12 Cancun X 15.06.12 Legnano X 16.06.12 Newcastle X 29.06.12 Leipzig X 30.07.12 Londres X Total X 53 DUPLITZER Imke GER 6 2 3 6 0 12 29 54 MARTINEZ Maria VEN 2 3 2 (0) (0) 3 (0) 12 (0) 6 28 55 DI TELLA Isabel ARG 0 3 2 0 2 21 28 56 YIN Mingfang CHN (0) 6 8 4 (0) (3) 6 4 28 57 CHENG Yuk Han Bjork HKG 0 4 12 12 0 28 58 LOGUNOVA Tatiana RUS 4 4 0 4 3 12 27 59 KONG Man Wai HKG 8 3 2 (0) 12 2 27 60 LIN Sheng CHN 4 (0) (2) (2) 8 6 6 2 26 61 BRAVO ARANGUIZ Caterin CHI 0 2 0 (0) (0) 0 (0) 12 4 6 24 62 POCHKALOVA Anfisa UKR (0) 4 0 4 6 6 4 24 63 HURLEY Kelley USA 0 (0) 0 0 2 12 8 22 64 ALIBERT Nathalie FRA 4 3 2 (2) 4 6 3 22 65 VICATOS Giselle RSA 0 0 0 21 21 66 LUGO Eliana VEN 0 0 0 21 21 67 GANA Lilia ALG 21 21 68 GUY Joanna CAN 0 0 0 (0) 0 21 0 21 69 KLONARIDES Daniella RSA 21 21 70 BALAGANSKAYA Ulyana KAZ 0 0 0 0 21 21 71 ZHAO Lingyu CHN 0 0 0 21 21 72 ASHRAF Nada EGY 21 21 73 CAMPBELL Lindsay USA 2 6 (0) 2 3 8 21 74 SHIMOOKAWA Ayaka JPN (0) 0 0 0 12 6 2 20 75 STROKA Malgorzata POL (0) 3 4 2 (2) 6 3 2 20 76 ZHONG Weiping CHN (0) (0) 2 0 2 3 12 19 77 NDOLO Alexandra GER 3 (0) (0) 4 6 (2) (2) (0) 3 2 18 78 HSU Jo-Ting TPE 0 0 0 (0) 0 (0) (0) 6 0 12 18 79 BELJAJEVA Julia EST 1 (0) 2 3 4 (0) 3 2 15 The points between parenthesis were not taken into account for the ranking 30.08.2012 Page 3 / 22 Ranking : Official - 2011/2012 Event : Senior Weapon : Epée Gender : F 23.10.11 Turku X 29.10.11 Copenhague X 12.11.11 Arhus X 27.11.11 Oslo X 11.12.11 Belgrade X 22.01.12 Stockholm X 11.02.12 Doha X 25.02.12 Budapest X 09.03.12 Barcelone X 23.03.12 St-Maur X 20.04.12 Casablanca X 22.04.12 Wakayama X 04.05.12 Rio de Janeiro X 05.05.12 Antalya X 19.05.12 La Havane X 19.05.12 Split X 09.06.12 Nankin X 15.06.12 Cancun X 15.06.12 Legnano X 16.06.12 Newcastle X 29.06.12 Leipzig X 30.07.12 Londres X Total X 79 BELJAJEVA Julia EST 1 (0) 2 3 4 (0) 3 2 15 80 COSTA Rayssa BRA 0 0 (0) (0) (0) 0 3 12 15 81 MULTERER Ricarda GER (0) (0) 0 4 2 3 3 2 14 82 TOL Sonja NED 0 0 2 0 8 3 13 83 DIONGUE Ndeye Binta SEN 12 12 84 HALLS Evelyn AUS 0 12 12 85 RAMIREZ PEGUERO Violeta DOM 12 12 86 ZERF Amel ALG 12 12 87 CHBANI Khadija MAR 12 12 88 YEPES MOLINA Dirley Janineth CRC 12 12 89 SHER Diana AUS 0 12 12 90 ANDRYUSHINA Tatyana RUS 2 2 0 8 12 91 MENEZES Clarisse BRA 0 0 0 0 12 12 92 EL HOUARI Narimene ALG 12 12 92 DRIDI Maroua TUN 12 12 94 SIMEAO Amanda BRA 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 95 BEN JABALLAH Dorra TUN 12 12 95 TARASKINA Antonina KGZ 12 12 97 HORIKAWA Kozue JPN 0 0 0 0 12 12 98 DEAC Simona ROU (0) 6 0 4 0 2 12 99 BEKEFI Edina HUN 4 0 4 4 12 100 REMBI Lauren FRA 2 3 (2) 2 3 2 12 101 COHEN Mary GBR 0 0 0 (0) 0 (0) (0) 8 3 11 102 RODIC Smiljka SRB 3 0 0 0 1 6 10 103 BARANIKOVA Dagmar SVK 1 1 (0) (0) (0) 2 4 0 2 10 104 FERRARI Marta ITA 8 0 0 2 10 105 WESTMAN Nina SWE 0 2 3 0 (0) 2 3 10 The points between parenthesis were not taken into account for the ranking 30.08.2012 Page 4 / 22 Ranking : Official - 2011/2012 Event : Senior Weapon : Epée Gender : F 23.10.11 Turku X 29.10.11 Copenhague X 12.11.11 Arhus X 27.11.11 Oslo X 11.12.11 Belgrade X 22.01.12 Stockholm X 11.02.12 Doha X 25.02.12 Budapest X 09.03.12 Barcelone X 23.03.12 St-Maur X 20.04.12 Casablanca X 22.04.12 Wakayama X 04.05.12 Rio de Janeiro X 05.05.12 Antalya X 19.05.12 La Havane X 19.05.12 Split X 09.06.12 Nankin X 15.06.12 Cancun X 15.06.12 Legnano X 16.06.12 Newcastle X 29.06.12 Leipzig X 30.07.12 Londres X Total X 105 WESTMAN Nina SWE 0 2 3 0 (0) 2 3 10 106 ZVEREVA Yana RUS 4 4 2 0 10 107 CHEN Yunxia CHN 2 2 0 6 10 108 HOU Yingming CHN 4 6 10 109 CHRISTMANN Beate GER 0 6 2 2 0 10 110 GORAM Melissa FRA 2 3 (0) 2 0 3 (0) 10 111 ANDREEVA Larisa KGZ 3 0 0 0 (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) 6 9 112 MCGEEVER Jennifer GBR (1) 2 (0) (0) (0) (0) 2 2 1 2 9 113 CHEN Hsin Ping TPE 0 0 0 3 (0) (0) 0 6 9 114 GUILHON Cleia BRA 0 (0) 0 0 0 3 6 9 115 MARTINEZ Dayana VEN 0 0 3 0 6 0 9 116 BRIASCO Brenda ITA 3 2 4 0 9 117 VLASOVA Vlada RUS 4 2 0 0 3 9 118 CANDASSAMY Marie Florence FRA 0 2 2 3 2 9 119 SWITZER Ainsley CAN 2 0 0 (0) 0 0 (0) 6 8 120 AGUERO Elida Sandra ARG 0 (0) 0 0 2 6 8 121 GARS Sanne SWE 0 0 (0) 0 2 (0) 0 6 8 122 GALANTINE Vanessa FRA 0 4 0 2 2 8 123 KOCHNEVA Olga RUS 2 0 2 4 0 8 124 DESCOUTS Audrey FRA 2 6 0 0 8 125 HIGHTON Elizabeth GBR 4 0 0 0 (0) 3 7 126 PIASECKA Caroline NOR 4 0 3 7 127 MARINUK Avital ISR 0 0 3 4 7 128 HUGAS-MALLORQUI Maria GER 3 0 0 4 7 129 KNAPIK Renata POL 0 3 0 2 2 7 130 JEVREMOVIC Alksandra SRB 2 0 4 0 6 131 HOOGE Karin Louise DEN 0 0 0 3 3 6 The points between parenthesis were not taken into account for the ranking 30.08.2012 Page 5 / 22 Ranking : Official - 2011/2012 Event : Senior Weapon : Epée Gender : F 23.10.11 Turku X 29.10.11 Copenhague X 12.11.11 Arhus X 27.11.11 Oslo X 11.12.11 Belgrade X 22.01.12 Stockholm X 11.02.12 Doha X 25.02.12 Budapest X 09.03.12 Barcelone X 23.03.12 St-Maur X 20.04.12 Casablanca X 22.04.12 Wakayama X 04.05.12 Rio de Janeiro X 05.05.12 Antalya X 19.05.12 La Havane X 19.05.12 Split X 09.06.12 Nankin X 15.06.12 Cancun X 15.06.12 Legnano X 16.06.12 Newcastle X 29.06.12 Leipzig X 30.07.12 Londres X Total X 131 HOOGE Karin Louise DEN 0 0 0 3 3 6 132 TERAN Alejandra MEX 0 0 0 0 6 6 133 YUNUSBAYEVA Jamilya KAZ 0 0 0 6 6 134 SIR IDAR Isnawaty INA 6 6 135 KOCK Catharina FIN 0 1 0 0 (0) 2 3 6 136 NGUYEN Thanh Van VIE 6 6 137 TANNOUS Dominique LIB 6 6 138 MELBYE Ann Karin SIN 6 6 139 CHEN Yinhua TPE 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 140 YEUNG Hiu
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Results: List of Results
    RESULTS: LIST OF RESULTS Competition Place Date Category Weapon Gender Event Type Championnats du St-Petersbourg 2007-09-30 S E F I CHM Monde * Results of the competitions marked with asterisk were not validated yet. Rank Points Name Nationality BirthDate 1 96 HEIDEMANN Britta GER 1982-12-22 2 78 LI Na CHN 1983-11-06 3 60 EMBRICH Irina EST 1980-07-12 3 60 NISIMA Maureen FRA 1981-07-30 5 42 STROGANOVA Eugenia RUS 1979-06-07 6 42 BOSCARELLI Francesca ITA 1982-05-27 7 42 IORDACHIOIU Loredana ROU 1984-03-02 8 42 SHUTOVA Lubov RUS 1983-06-25 9 24 LOGOUNOVA Tatiana RUS 1980-07-03 10 24 ZHONG Weiping CHN 1983-11-06 11 24 TOL Sonja NED 1972-11-16 12 24 SIVKOVA Anna RUS 1982-04-12 13 24 LUO Xiaojuan CHN 1983-11-06 14 24 SHEMYAKINA Yana UKR 1986-01-05 15 24 VANSOVICA Julija LAT 1975-08-24 16 24 HARADA Megumi JPN 1979-08-01 17 12 FLESSEL-COLOVIC Laura FRA 1971-11-06 18 12 SZASZ Emese HUN 1982-09-07 19 12 NAGY Timea HUN 1970-08-22 20 12 KIRALY PICOT Hajnalka FRA 1971-03-02 21 12 BRANZA Ana ROU 1984-11-26 22 12 ZHANG Li CHN 1983-11-06 23 12 BOKEL Claudia GER 1973-08-30 24 12 MOELLHAUSEN Nathalie ITA 1985-12-01 25 12 GRABOWSKA Magdalena POL 1980-09-18 26 12 HURLEY Courtney USA 1990-09-30 27 12 PANUSCHKA Claudia AUT 1978-07-07 28 12 MACESEANU Iuliana ROU 1981-07-07 29 12 JUNG Hyo-Jung KOR 1984-01-26 30 12 MINCZA-NEBALD Ildiko HUN 1969-11-06 31 12 MAGKANOUDAKI Dimitra GRE 1979-03-26 32 12 CASCIOLI Cristiana ITA 1975-08-10 33 6 SCHALM Sherraine CAN 1975-06-21 34 6 HORMAY Adrienn HUN 1971-10-07 35 6 DUPLITZER Imke GER 1975-07-28 36 6 DEL CARRETTO Bianca
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2009 - 2010
    CENTRE FOR INTELLIGENT MACHINES (CIM) www.cim.mcgill.ca Annual Report 2009 - 2010 Director Professor Benoit Boulet [email protected] Table of Contents BACKGROUND SUMMARY 3 RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS 5 New Member 5 New Associate Members 5 OUTSTANDING SCIENTIFIC CONTRIBUTIONS 7 CIM 25th Anniversary Seminar Series 7 CIM in the News 11 Kudos 12 Appendices Contents FACULTY MEMBERS i STUDENT AWARDS AND RECOGNITION iii STUDENT DISTRIBUTION xv STUDENT RESEARCH TOPICS xvi VISITORS xx VISITING LECTURES xxii PUBLICATIONS xxvii 2 CIM Annual Report 2009 – 2010 BACKGROUND SUMMARY Mission The Centre for Intelligent Machines (CIM) supports graduate research, teaching and applications of intelligent systems. This dynamic community of scientists, engineers and designers seek to bridge science and innovation. Their novel ideas bring solutions to some of the most challenging problems of the 21st century. Established in 1985 CIM was formed in 1985 as the McGill Research Centre for Intelligent Machines (McRCIM). At that time, it reported to the Dean of the Faculty of Engineering and the Vice-Principal Graduate Studies and Research. Members from the Department of Electrical Engineering, the Department of Mechanical Engineering, the Department of Biomedical Engineering, the Department of Mining and Materials Engineering and the School of Computer Science contributed to the Centre’s early formation. As of 2009-2010 Today, the Centre is comprised of 29 faculty members and associate members, about 150 graduate and honors-undergraduate students, post-doctoral fellows and visitors and 13 topical laboratories. The Centre for Intelligent Machines (CIM) currently spans 2 faculties with members from the Departments of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and the School of Computer Science.
    [Show full text]
  • 96O Congreso
    96o Congreso DUBÁI, EAU 25 DE NOVIEMBRE DEL 2017 Índice Índice 3 Presencias 4 Federaciones presentes o representadas 6 Agenda 15 Validación de las presencias y de los poderes 16 Discursos del Presidente de la FIE y del Presidente de la 17 Federación de Esgrima de los Emiratos Árabes Unidos Ratificación de las nuevas federaciones 19 Aprobación del informe del Congreso 2016 organizado en Moscú (RUS) 20 Informe anual 2016 del Comité Ejecutivo 21 Informe financiero 2016, informe de los revisores de cuentas, aprobación 22 3 de las cuentas, descargo al Comité Ejecutivo y a los revisores de cuentas Presupuesto para el 2018 23 Nominación de los revisores de cuentas 24 Reestructuración de los Reglamentos de la FIE 25 Juegos Olímpicos 2020 26 Propuestas sometidas al Congreso e informes de las Comisiones 28 y Consejos Votación para la atribución de los campeonatos del mundo J/C 2020: 47 candidaturas de Bulgaria y USA – Veteranos 2019: candidatura de Egipto; Veteranos 2020: candidaturas de Croacia y Eslovenia Nominación de los Miembros de Honor 51 Atribución del Trofeo Chevalier Feyerick 52 Diversos puntos 53 Anexos 57 Presencias La sesión se abre a las 10 am. Tomaron lugar en la tribuna: Sr. Alisher Usmanov (RUS) Presidente Sr. Emmanuel Katsiadakis (MH, GRE) Secretario general Sra. Ferial Nadira Salhi (ALG) Secretaria-Tesorera Sr. Donald Anthony (USA) Vice-presidente Sr. Wei Wang (CHN) Vice-presidente Sra. Ana Pascu (MH, ROU) Vice-presidente Sra. Nathalie Rodriguez M.-H. CEO Sr. Evgeny Tsoukhlo Director technico y deportivo Miembros del Comité Ejecutivo: Sr. Jacek Bierkowski (POL) Sr. Bence Szabo (HUN) Sra.
    [Show full text]
  • Work Units, Marital Regulation, and Rising Divorce Rates in China ∗
    When the State Retreats: Work Units, Marital Regulation, and Rising Divorce Rates in China ∗ Yifeng Wan † Johns Hopkins University April 18, 2019 Abstract The high and rising divorce rate in China is not easily reconciled with tradi- tional theories that emphasize the role of modernization in changing family life. By reformulating the state social engineering theory, this paper argues that the retreat of the state from private life has contributed to China’s ris- ing divorce rates in the past four decades. A divorce reform that simplified divorce procedures and the declining significance of the work unit are two mechanisms through which the retreating state may influence divorce rates. Results from province-level panel data set suggest that smaller share of em- ployment in state and collective work units is associated with higher divorce rates. The diminishing function of institutional control accounts for the effect of the work unit on rising divorce rates. Key words: Divorce; work units; state regulation; divorce law; Chinese families ∗I am grateful to Andy Cherlin for his support and guidance throughout the entirety of this project. I also thank Joel Andreas, Julia Burdick-Will, Rachel Butler, Sebastian Link Chaparro, Lingxin Hao, Conrad Jacober, Tiantian Liu, Rhiannon Miller, Elayne Cardoso de Morais, Steve Morgan, Kiara Nerenberg, Corey Payne, Sonal Sharma, Xingyun Wu, Xiao Yu, Yuehua Zhang, Nanxi Zeng, and seminar participants at Johns Hopkins University and Zhejiang University for their helpful comments. †Department of Sociology, Johns Hopkins University, 555 Mergenthaler Hall, 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218. Email: [email protected]. 1 Introduction Traditionally a society with universal marriage and low divorce rates (Yang 1959), China has witnessed substantial increase in divorce rates in the past four decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Results: List of Results
    RESULTS: LIST OF RESULTS Competition Place Date Category Weapon Gender Event Type Epée Rio de Janeiro 2012-05-04 S E F I A internationale * Results of the competitions marked with asterisk were not validated yet. Rank Points Name Nationality BirthDate 1 32 FIAMINGO Rossella ITA 1991-07-14 2 26 SUN Yujie CHN 1992-08-10 3 20 NISIMA Maureen FRA 1981-07-30 3 20 SHEMYAKINA Yana UKR 1986-01-05 5 14 BRANZA Ana Maria ROU 1984-11-26 6 14 SOZANSKA Monika GER 1983-03-13 7 14 FLESSEL-COLOVIC Laura FRA 1971-11-06 8 14 HURLEY Courtney USA 1990-09-30 9 8 SHUTOVA Lyubov RUS 1983-06-25 10 8 KOLOBOVA Violetta RUS 1991-07-27 11 8 ANDRYUSHINA Tatyana RUS 1990-06-26 12 8 NELIP Ewa POL 1989-05-01 13 8 LIN Sheng CHN 1994-01-05 14 8 SHIN A Lam KOR 1986-09-23 15 8 COHEN Mary GBR 1986-10-08 16 8 TOL Sonja NED 1972-11-16 17 4 DEL CARRETTO Bianca ITA 1985-08-28 18 4 GHERMAN Simona ROU 1985-04-12 19 4 LUO Xiaojuan CHN 1984-06-12 20 4 SZASZ Emese HUN 1982-09-07 21 4 DINU Loredana ROU 1984-04-02 22 4 BOSCARELLI Francesca ITA 1982-05-27 23 4 LOGUNOVA Tatiana RUS 1980-07-03 24 4 ALIBERT Nathalie FRA 1984-08-17 25 4 QUONDAMCARLO Francesca ITA 1984-08-21 26 4 GUDKOVA Tatiana RUS 1993-01-11 27 4 POCHKALOVA Anfisa UKR 1990-03-01 28 4 HEIDEMANN Britta GER 1982-12-22 29 4 MOELLHAUSEN Nathalie ITA 1985-12-01 30 4 KOCHNEVA Olga RUS 1988-06-29 31 4 BARANIKOVA Dagmar SVK 1989-05-02 32 4 CHOI Eun Sook KOR 1986-02-28 33 2 NAVARRIA Mara ITA 1985-07-18 34 2 PIEKARSKA Magdalena POL 1986-11-28 35 2 CHOI In Jeong KOR 1990-05-21 36 2 LI Na CHN 1981-03-09 37 2 MAROIU Anca ROU 1983-08-05
    [Show full text]
  • Wug 0814 A10.Indd
    PAGE 10 • AUGUST 14, 2011 CHINA DAILY FENCING A pointed lesson for Xu YOUNG CHINESE FENCER BATTLES NERVES IN EDUCATIONAL LOSS TO AMERICAN By ZHANG CHUNMEI “I had never met Courtney CHINA DAILY before. I knew nothing about her skill and tempo. My skill was better SHENZHEN — A sad and disap- than her’s, but when she suddenly pointed Xu Anqi, 19, left the strip changed her tempo, I could not fi nd after losing 15-14 to Courtney a way to break her defense,” said Xu. Hurley of the United States in the Xu emerged on the international round-of-32 of the women’s epee stage with a stunning victory at individual event at the exhibition the 2007 World Cup. Th e 15-year- center in Shenzhen on Saturday. old fencer managed to overpower Xu, a rising Chinese fencing star, the 2000 and 2004 Russian Olym- started poorly and was unable to pic squad’s gold medalist, Oxana GAO ERQIANG / CHINA DAILY grab the lead against her foe. She Ermakova. Xu Anqi from China (left) competes against Courtney Hurley of the US in the round-of-32 in the women’s cried aft er losing her match against “That was my first time at a epee individual event at the Shenzhen Universiade on Saturday. Xu lost 15-14. Japan in the fi nal bout of the wom- senior competition. Five national en’s epee group competition at the team members went to play oth- a local sports school in Nanjing gold medal in 2006, when she was I think an excellent fencer should 2010 Guangzhou Asian Games.
    [Show full text]
  • Competition Place Date Category Weapon Gender Event Type
    Competition Place Date Category Weapon Gender Event Type Ciudad de Barcelone 09.03.2012 Senior Epée F Individual A Barcelona Rank Pts Name Nationality Birth Licence 1 32 BRANZA Ana ROU 26.11.84 26111984000 2 26 GHERMAN Simona ROU 12.04.85 12041985000 3 20 PIEKARSKA Magdalena POL 28.11.86 28111986000 3 20 SUN Yujie CHN 10.08.92 10081992000 5 14 SHEMYAKINA Yana UKR 05.01.86 05011986002 6 14 LUO Xiaojuan CHN 12.06.84 12061984004 7 14 EMBRICH Irina EST 12.07.80 12071980003 8 14 QUONDAMCARLO Francesca ITA 21.08.84 21081984001 9 8 GEROUDET Tiffany SUI 03.09.86 03091986000 10 8 SHUTOVA Lubov RUS 25.06.83 25061983000 11 8 CHOI In Jeong KOR 21.05.90 21051990007 12 8 SIVKOVA Anna RUS 12.04.82 12041982000 13 8 SZASZ Emese HUN 07.09.82 07091982003 14 8 YIN Mingfang CHN 04.02.86 04021986004 15 8 MOELLHAUSEN Nathalie ITA 01.12.85 01121985000 16 8 HURLEY Courtney USA 30.09.90 30091990000 17 4 LI Na CHN 09.03.81 09031981001 18 4 FLESSEL-COLOVIC Laura FRA 06.11.71 06111971000 18 4 XU Anqi CHN 23.01.92 23011992001 20 4 ZVEREVA Yana RUS 06.03.89 06031989002 21 4 LOGOUNOVA Tatiana RUS 03.07.80 03071980000 22 4 BERGDAHL Johanna SWE 08.06.90 08061990000 23 4 GALANTINE Vanessa FRA 04.06.83 04061983000 24 4 BEKEFI Edina HUN 01.04.91 01041991001 25 4 JUNG Hyo-Jung KOR 26.01.84 26011984006 26 4 KIRPU Erika EST 22.06.92 22061992002 27 4 NELIP Ewa POL 01.05.89 01051989000 28 4 BOSCARELLI Francesca ITA 27.05.82 27051982001 29 4 STROKA Malgorzata POL 12.09.80 12091980000 30 4 FERNANDEZ Clementine FRA 10.01.91 10011991001 31 4 BELJAJEVA Julia EST 21.07.92 21071992000
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-21 POCIG CV Book
    CV BOOK PLANNERS OF COLOR INTEREST GROUP 2020-2021 — AMERICAN COLLEGIATE SCHOOLS OF PLANNING ABOUT POCIG ABOUT POCIG The vision of The Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning Planners of Color Interest Group (ACSP-POCIG) as outlined in its 2011 strategic plan is as follows: We envision a planning academy and linked with race and class issues. profession that advances social and Third, planning education prepares racial justice. We envision the evolution professionals to work with communities of this academy so that its faculty and of color and to seek social justice through students reflect the nation’s diverse the expansion of choice and opportunity people. We envision that the mission for all persons. of POCIG is viewed by all as critical to the health and future of the institution of The planning academy—its faculty and ACSP. students—represents the full diversity of our people in our society. Many of We embrace three fundamental our planning schools are inclusive, with premises: first, that planning as a field robust engagement with communities of recognizes social and racial justice color. POCIG is a locus of connection, as central to the vitality of places, and networking, and support for planning it recognizes disparity and injustice academics of color in ACSP and in ACSP as barriers to thriving, sustainable, member schools and other institutions resilient communities. Second, planning of higher education. The research, scholarship recognizes and illuminates knowledge, and participation of POCIG institutionalized inequality, structures guide the programmatic aims of ACSP that perpetuate inequality, and the fact in addressing diversity in the planning that all planning issues are inextricably academy.
    [Show full text]
  • FIE Qualifications OG Tokyo July 2021
    Tokyo Olympic Games Equipes qualifiées Qualified Teams Equipos calificados FLEURET MASCULIN FLEURET FEMININ MEN'S FOIL WOMEN'S FOIL FLORETE MASCULINO FLORETE FEMENINO Classement / Classement / Pays / Country / PaÍs Ranking FIE Q Pays / Country / PaÍs Ranking FIE Q USA 1 ROC 1 FRANCE 2 ITALY 2 ITALY 3 FRANCE 3 ROC 4 USA 4 HONG KONG, CHINA 5 JAPAN 5 EGYPT 8 CANADA 6 GERMANY 10 HUNGARY 7 CANADA 14 EGYPT 15 JAPAN 7 EPEE MASCULINE EPEE FEMININE MEN'S EPEE WOMEN'S EPEE ESPADA MASCULINA ESPADA FEMENINA Classement / Classement / Pays / Country / PaÍs Q Pays / Country / PaÍs Q Ranking FIE Ranking FIE FRANCE 1 CHINA 1 ITALY 2 POLAND 2 UKRAINE 3 ROC 3 SWITZERLAND 4 KOREA 4 KOREA 5 USA 5 ROC 7 ITALY 6 USA 10 HONG KONG, CHINA 15 CHINA* 6 ESTONIA* 7 JAPAN 8 Pays hôte Host country * as Africa is not represented in places 5-16 * as Africa is not represented in places 5-16 País anfitrión in the FIE ranking in the FIE ranking SABRE MASCULIN SABRE FEMININ MEN'S SABRE WOMEN'S SABRE SABLE MASCULINO SABLE FEMENINO Classement / Classement / Pays / Country / PaÍs Q Pays / Country / PaÍs Q Ranking FIE Ranking FIE KOREA 1 ROC 1 HUNGARY 2 ITALY 2 ITALY 3 FRANCE 3 GERMANY 4 KOREA 4 ROC 5 HUNGARY 5 IRAN 6 USA 7 USA 8 CHINA 9 EGYPT 9 TUNISIA 16 JAPAN 13 JAPAN 10 Athlètes qualifiés pour les JO Tokyo Athletes qualified for the Tokyo Olympic Games Atletas calificados para los JO de Tokio Fleuret féminin / Women's foil / Florete feminino Nom / Family name / Prénom / Given name / Pays / Country Q Apellido Nombre / País 1 DERIGLAZOVA Inna ROC Q= Qualifiés par 2 KOROBEYNIKOVA
    [Show full text]
  • NARSC 2020 Virtual Conference
    NARSC 2020 Virtual Conference November 9-13, 2020 The North American Regional Science Council === Official Time Zone: U.S. Central === Monday, November 9, 2020 [CANCELLED] Workshop: Economic Modeling with TERM-USA Using Customized RunGEM Organizers: John Madden, Victoria University; Louis Roos, Victoria University 10:00 AM-1:00 PM 1. Workshop: Spatial Data Analysis for Social Sciences: Data, Technology and Applications Monday Nov 9 | 10:00 AM-1:00 PM | Room: Boyce * FREE REGISTRATION. Registration required. Co-sponsors: Geo-computation Center for Social Sciences, Wuhan University; China Data Institute Instructors: Shuming Bao, China Data Institute; Tao Hu, Center for Geographical Analysis, Harvard University; Yuanzhen Shao, Geo-computation Center for Social Sciences, Wuhan University Link to more information: Spatial Data Analysis for Social Sciences 10:00 AM-5:00 PM 2. Workshop: Spatial Data Analysis with PySAL Monday Nov 9 | 10:00 AM-5:00 PM | Room: China Data Institute Registration Required. Instructors: Sergio Rey, University of California - Riverside; Wei Kang, University of California – Riverside Link to more information: Spatial Data Analysis with PySAL 10:00 AM-11:40 AM 3. The Regional Science Academy (TRSA) Special Session: Talk Table on 'The Post-Corona Space-Economy' Monday Nov 9 | 10:00 AM-11:40 AM | Room: IMPLAN Organizers: Peter Nijkamp, JADS, The Netherlands; Karima Kourtit, Open University, Heerlen The Netherlands Speakers (tentative): Richard Florida, Paul Romer, Ed Glaeser, Jo Stiglitz, Saskia Sassen, Simi Davoudi, Sumona Banerjee, Klaus Zimmermann, Eduardo Haddad This session provides an innovative interaction between prominent speakers and a wider, orchestrated audience online connected all over the world. Issues to be addressed: - Will the COVID-19 pandemics change our views on urban density and design? - Will suburbs become more attractive residential areas? NARSC 2020 Virtual Conference | 1 === Official Time Zone: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • HAVE YOU EATEN? HAVE YOU DIVORCED? DEBATING the MEANING of FREEDOM in MARRIAGE in CHINA by WILLIAM P. ALFORD & SHEN YUANYUAN
    HAVE YOU EATEN? HAVE YOU DIVORCED? DEBATING THE MEANING OF FREEDOM IN MARRIAGE IN CHINA by WILLIAM P. ALFORD & SHEN YUANYUAN “Have You Eaten? Have You Divorced? Marriage, Divorce and the Assessment of Freedom in China,” in Ideas of Freedom in the Chinese World, ed. W. Kirby (Stanford University Press, 2003).* A great deal of discussion about freedom in the People’s Republic of China has proceeded on certain assumptions about the role of the state and about law’s place in helping define it. At the heart of these assumptions is the idea that the cause of freedom in China will best be advanced through the state’s retrenchment and a concomitant ceding of power to non-state actors, particularly with respect to economic and social matters. This notion is perhaps most obvious in calls for the promotion of greater economic freedom via both the “privatization” of state owned enterprise and an increasing reliance on market forces, but it also informs the view that such measures are or soon will be leading to a marked growth in political freedom. And it undergirds the conviction of most observers that what is termed the rise of civil society will perforce enhance personal freedom in China. As the noted Chinese scholar Liu Junning observed in a recent essay extolling Hayek, “almost all of those who shape public opinion in China are liberals [as] classical liberalism now dominates China’s intellectual landscape.”1 Law occupies a prominent position in this vision, being increasingly seen in both academic and policy circles as critical to the attainment for Chinese of fuller economic, political, and social freedoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Gendered Patterns and Solidarity of the Unions: Differentiations Between International Marriages and Domestic Marriages in China
    Gendered Patterns and Solidarity of the Unions: Differentiations between International Marriages and Domestic Marriages in China Shenghan Cai1 Fei Guo2 and Shuang Liu3 Abstract With implementation of the economic reform, opening-up, and family planning policy, China has experienced profound socioeconomic and cultural changes since the late 1970s. Following the relax of migration control, the country’s youthful structure of population and adequate labour force contributes to its geospatial imbalanced socioeconomic prosperity and large scale of emigration. Recently, with China’s economic success, the internal and international migration has increased while international marriages experienced dramatic increase and decrease, which requires sufficient study. Using a unique dataset of international and domestic marriage registration from the provincial Bureau of Civil Affairs, this paper aims to examine the differentiation between international marriages and domestic marriages from 2010 to 2014, the effects of educational attainment, occupation and marital status on the choice of transnational relationships. Logistic and Cox regression models are used to analyse the probability of choosing international marriages and the solidarity of both international and domestic marriages. The results suggest that international married couples show a higher probability of larger age gap, remarriage, and divorce, yet the age-gap and proportion of remarriage are decreasing in recent years. Younger birth cohorts might have shorter solidarities for both types of marriage. Different from conventional understanding, this study suggests that individual with primary or college educational attainment are more likely to marry internationally while occupation in commerce and service industry might increase the possibility of choosing international marriage. The result also suggests that Mainland Chinese and residents from SARs couples experienced the lowest hazard of divorce than Mainland Chinese and Overseas sojourn Chinese couples who share more cultural and social similarities.
    [Show full text]