NIKHEF Annual Report 2003

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NIKHEF Annual Report 2003 NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND HIGH-ENERGY PHYSICS ANNUAL REPORT 2003 Kruislaan 409, 1098 SJ Amsterdam P.O. Box 41882, 1009 DB Amsterdam Colofon Publication edited for NIKHEF: Address: Postbus 41882, 1009 DB Amsterdam Kruislaan 409, 1098 SJ Amsterdam Phone: +31 20 592 2000 Fax: +31 20 592 5155 E-mail: [email protected] Editors: Louk Lapik´as,Marcel Vreeswijk & Auke-Pieter Colijn Layout & art-work: Kees Huyser Cover Photograph: Relativistic fluid mechanics: impression of a fluid current moving on a sphere where scalar fields live. URL: http://www.nikhef.nl NIKHEF is the National Institute for Nuclear Physics and High-Energy Physics in the Netherlands, in which the Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter (FOM), the Universiteit van Amsterdam (UvA), the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VUA), the Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen (KUN) and the Universiteit Utrecht (UU) collaborate. NIKHEF co-ordinates and supports all activities in experimental subatomic (high-energy) physics in the Netherlands. NIKHEF participates in the preparation of experiments at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, notably Atlas, LHCb and Alice. NIKHEF is actively involved in experiments in the USA (D∅ at Fermilab, BaBar at SLAC and STAR at RHIC), in Germany at DESY (Zeus, Hermes and Hera-b) and at CERN (Delphi, L3 and the heavy-ion fixed-target programme). Furthermore astroparticle physics is part of NIKHEF’s scientific programme, in particular through participation in the ANTARES project: a detector to be built in the Mediterranean. Detector R&D, design and construction of detectors and the data-analysis take place at the laboratory located in Sciencepark Amsterdam as well as at the participating universities. NIKHEF has a theory group with both its own research program and close contacts with the experimental groups. Contents Preface 1 A Experimental Programmes 3 1 The ATLAS Experiment 3 1.1 ATLAS experiment 3 1.2 D experiment 9 ∅ 2 The B-Physics Programme 13 2.1 Introduction 13 2.2 Status of HERA-B 13 2.3 Status of the BaBar Experiment 13 2.4 The LHCb Vertex detector 15 2.5 Level-0 Pile-Up Veto System 18 2.6 The Outer Tracker of LHCb 18 2.7 Reconstruction and Physics Studies 22 3 Heavy Ion Physics 25 3.1 Introduction 25 3.2 Results from SPS experiments 25 3.3 Jet production and jet quenching studied in STAR 26 3.4 The Alice experiment at CERN 27 4 ANTARES 29 4.1 Introduction 29 4.2 Prototype Sector Line 29 4.3 On-shore data processing 30 4.4 Analysis methods 30 4.5 Outlook 31 i 5 ZEUS 33 5.1 Introduction 33 5.2 ZEUS beats HERA beam background 33 5.3 Analysis HERA-I from 1991-2000 33 5.4 Performance of the ZEUS vertex detector 34 6 HERMES 37 6.1 Introduction 37 6.2 Data taking 38 6.3 Physics analysis 38 6.4 Instrumentation 41 6.5 Outlook 43 7 DELPHI 45 7.1 DELPHI programme and Detector exhibit 45 7.2 Publications 45 7.3 B physics 45 7.4 QCD 46 7.5 Standard Model Electroweak results 46 8 L3 49 8.1 Introduction 49 8.2 Searches 49 8.3 W and Z physics 49 8.4 QCD 51 8.5 L3+Cosmics 51 B Transition Programme 53 1 New Detector R&D at NIKHEF 53 1.1 Introduction 53 1.2 The readout of drift chambers with the Time-Pix-Grid 53 1.3 CMOS-based pixel detectors 55 1.4 X-ray imaging pixel detectors 55 2 Grid Projects 57 2.1 Introduction 57 2.2 Local Facilities 57 ii 2.3 The LHC Computing Grid Project 57 2.4 The DataGrid Project 57 2.5 AliEn 60 2.6 D Grid 60 ∅ 2.7 EGEE 60 2.8 Virtual Laboratory for eScience 60 3 Experiments abroad 61 3.1 Proton-neutron knockout from 3He induced by virtual photons 61 C Theoretical Physics 63 1 Theoretical Physics Group 63 1.1 Introduction 63 1.2 Physics of the standard model 63 1.3 Beyond the standard model 64 1.4 Cosmology, astrophysics and quantum gravity 64 D Technical Departments 67 1 Computer Technology 67 1.1 Computer system management 67 1.2 Project support 69 2 Electronics Technology 73 2.1 Introduction 73 2.2 Department developments 73 2.3 Projects 73 3 Engineering Department 79 3.1 ATLAS 79 3.2 LHCb 80 3.3 Alice Inner Tracking System 81 3.4 ANTARES 81 3.5 Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer 81 3.6 IdePhix 82 4 Mechanical Workshop 83 iii 4.1 Introduction 83 4.2 Projects 83 E Publications, Theses and Talks 87 1 Publications 87 2 PhD Theses 98 3 Invited Talks 99 F Resources and Personnel 105 1 Resources 105 2 Membership of Councils and Committees during 2003 106 3 Personnel as of December 31, 2003 109 iv Preface The CERN LHC program will start in 2007. This is an at the end of the year 2002. These physicists have important date for many physicists worldwide and cer- concentrated on the measurement of the angle γ, one of tainly also for NIKHEF and its scientific and technical the parameters expressing CP-violation in the B system. staff. The construction of the various components of The BaBar collaboration found the new charmed meson 0 0 the large detectors ATLAS, LHCb and ALICE or instead Ds (2317) and discovered the decay B π π . Its sees steady progress. During 2003 we saw completion branching fraction is an important input in→ further CP- of 75 out of 96 muon chambers for ATLAS. NIKHEF violation studies. The STAR collaboration has obtained scientists contributed in an important way to the H8 interesting results on the behavior of jets produced in testbeam which validated many aspects of the ATLAS heavy-ion collisions. These results are important for the muon System. In LHCb an important achievement was ALICE Program. the production of the first prototype secondary vacuum In order to investigate phenomena like the Higgs mech- box. The LHCb outer tracker project has passed all anism or CP-violation, sound theoretical predictions are necessary steps to enter the production phase. The AL- necessary. The NIKHEF theory group has been work- ICE experiment is also entering the production phase. ing on many aspects of the standard model and beyond. NIKHEF contributes to electronics and readout. To- Here it remains clear that the algebra program FORM gether with industry, tooling has been developed for is an indispensable tool in this theoretical work. The the positioning of the silicon ladders. theory group entered the field of astroparticle physics, These preparations for the LHC program form an a relatively new area of research. enormous challenge for the technical departments of From the start of LHC operations, the experimental NIKHEF. Their work is essential in the execution of the group will have to deal with massive amounts of data scientific program of NIKHEF, and in the preparation at an unprecedented level. The development of the re- for future activities. At this point, with a deep sense quired grid technology is now well underway. NIKHEF of loss, I recall the decease of Paul Rewiersma of the plays a major role in the development of several grid electronics technology department. Paul started his technologies and its implementation in several grid work at NIKHEF with design work for the ACCMOR projects such as VL-E and EGEE. The NIKHEF par- collaboration. His last contributions were to the ticipation in D and other experiments provides good ANTARES experiment. opportunities to∅ test the grid for high-energy physics The design and construction of detectors is only one ac- applications. tivity towards the LHC program. In parallel, NIKHEF On the 17th of March 2003 the ANTARES collabora- physicists participate in the D experiment at Fermi- tion successfully put the first data and control lines on lab, BaBar at SLAC and the∅ STAR collaboration at the bottom of the Mediterranean Sea and connected Brookhaven. The aim is to be involved in frontline ex- the equipment to the junction box so that signals were perimental research as well as to prepare for the many available on shore on the same day. Although there analysis tasks at similar LHC experiments. was a problem with the reference clock, many aspects The D experiment has performed a thorough analysis of the design could be validated. The completion of of the∅ properties of the top-quark, with the important this neutrino telescope is foreseen in 2006. result that the value of the top-quarks mass is now The LEP program has officially come to an end in 2003; 179.0 3.5 3.8 GeV. This value is higher than the the enormous contribution of the LEP program to our results± from± previous analyses. In combination with current understanding of the standard model will be in LEP data it means that the prediction for the Higgs the textbooks for many years to come. The NIKHEF mass is now also higher. A NIKHEF group joined BaBar program at the HERA collider has been the subject of 1 an extensive review by a panel chaired by J. Dainton. The committee underlined the high quality of the sci- entific work and made strong recommendations for the final stages and completion of the program at HERA. Jos Engelen During the year 2003 it became clear that Jos Enge- len would not complete his five year term as director of NIKHEF. He was appointed by the CERN council as Chief Scientific Officer and deputy Director General of CERN. The NIKHEF community congratulates him with this great personal and scientific honor.
Recommended publications
  • HERA Collisions CERN LHC Magnets
    The Gallex (gallium-based) solar neutrino experiment in the Gran Sasso underground Laboratory in Italy has seen evidence for neutrinos from the proton-proton fusion reaction deep inside the sun. A detailed report will be published in our next edition. again, with particles taken to 26.5 aperture models are also foreseen to GeV and initial evidence for electron- CERN test coil and collar assemblies and a proton collisions being seen. new conductor distribution will further Earlier this year, the big Zeus and LHC magnets improve multipole components. H1 detectors were moved into A number of other models and position to intercept the first HERA With test magnets for CERN's LHC prototypes are being built elsewhere collisions, and initial results from this proton-proton collider regularly including a twin-aperture model at new physics frontier are eagerly attaining field strengths which show the Japanese KEK Laboratory and awaited. that 10 Tesla is not forbidden terri­ another in the Netherlands (FOM-UT- tory, attention turns to why and NIHKEF). The latter will use niobium- where quenches happen. If 'training' tin conductor, reaching for an even can be reduced, superconducting higher field of 11.5 T. At KEK, a magnets become easier to commis­ single aperture configuration was sion. Tests have shown that successfully tested at 4.3 K, reaching quenches occur mainly at the ends of the short sample limit of the cable the LHC magnets. This should be (8 T) in three quenches. This magnet rectifiable, and models incorporating was then shipped to CERN for HERA collisions improvements will soon be reassem­ testing at the superfluid helium bled by the industrial suppliers.
    [Show full text]
  • Trigger and Data Acquisition
    Trigger and data acquisition N. Ellis CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Abstract The lectures address some of the issues of triggering and data acquisition in large high-energy physics experiments. Emphasis is placed on hadron-collider experiments that present a particularly challenging environment for event se- lection and data collection. However, the lectures also explain how T/DAQ systems have evolved over the years to meet new challenges. Some examples are given from early experience with LHC T/DAQ systems during the 2008 single-beam operations. 1 Introduction These lectures concentrate on experiments at high-energy particle colliders, especially the general- purpose experiments at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) [1]. These experiments represent a very chal- lenging case that illustrates well the problems that have to be addressed in state-of-the-art high-energy physics (HEP) trigger and data-acquisition (T/DAQ) systems. This is also the area in which the author is working (on the trigger for the ATLAS experiment at LHC) and so is the example that he knows best. However, the lectures start with a more general discussion, building up to some examples from LEP [2] that had complementary challenges to those of the LHC. The LEP examples are a good reference point to see how HEP T/DAQ systems have evolved in the last few years. Students at this school come from various backgrounds — phenomenology, experimental data analysis in running experiments, and preparing for future experiments (including working on T/DAQ systems in some cases). These lectures try to strike a balance between making the presentation accessi- ble to all, and going into some details for those already familiar with T/DAQ systems.
    [Show full text]
  • India-CMS Newsletter Member Institutes/ Universities of India-CMS
    India-CMS Newsletter Member Institutes/ Universities of India-CMS Vol 1. No. 1, July 2015 1. Nuclear Physics Division (NPD) Bhabha Atomic Research Center (BARC) Mumbai http://www.barc.gov.in/ First volume produced at: 2. Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Department of Physics Pune http://www.iiserpune.ac.in Panjab University Sector 14 Chandigarh - 160014 3. Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar http:// www.iitbbs.ac.in 4. Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Bombay Mumbai http://www.iitb.ac.in/en/education/academic-divisions 5. Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Madras Chennai https://www.iitm.ac.in 6. School of Physical Sciences National Institute of Science Education and Research (NISER), Edited and Compiled by: Bhubaneswar http://physics.niser.ac.in/ Manjit Kaur Department of Physics 7. Department of Physics Panjab University Panjab University Chandigarh Chandigarh http://physics.puchd.ac.in/ [email protected] 8. Division of High Energy Nuclear and Particle Physics Ajit Mohanty Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics (SINP) Director Kolkata http://www.saha.ac.in/web/henppd-home Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics (SINP) Kolkatta 9. Department of High Energy Physics [email protected] Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR), Mumbai http://www.tifr.res.in/ ~dhep/ Abhimanyu Chawla Department of Physics 10. Department of Physics & Astrophysics Panjab University University of Delhi Chandigarh Delhi http://www.du.ac.in/du/index.php?page=physics-astrophysics [email protected] 11. Visva Bharti Santiniketan, West Bengal 731204 http://www.visvabharati.ac.in/Address.html 1 2 Contents Message ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 Message .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • QCD Studies at L3
    QCD Studies at L3 Swagato Banerjee Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai 400 005 2002 QCD Studies at L3 Swagato Banerjee Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai 400 005 A Thesis submitted to the University of Mumbai for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics March, 2002 To my parents Acknowledgement It has been an extremely enlightening and enriching experience working with Sunanda Banerjee, supervisor of this thesis. I would like to thank him for his forbearance and encouragement and for teaching me the different aspects of the subject with lots of patience. I thank all the members of the Department of High Energy Physics of Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR) for providing various facilities and support, and ideal ambiance for research. In particular, I would like to thank B.S. Acharya, T. Aziz, Sudeshna Banerjee, B.M. Bellara, P.V. Deshpande, S.T. Divekar, S.N. Ganguli, A. Gurtu, M.R. Krishnaswamy, K. Mazumdar, M. Maity, N.K. Mondal, V.S. Narasimham, P.M. Pathare, K. Sudhakar and S.C. Tonwar. Asesh Dutta, Dilip Ghosh, S. Gupta, Krishnendu Mukherjee, Sreerup Ray Chaudhuri, D.P. Roy, Sourov Roy, Gavin Salam and K. Sridhar provided valuable theoretical insight on various occasions. My heartfelt thanks to them. I thank the European Organisation for Nuclear Research (CERN) for its kind hospitality and all the members of the Large Electron Positron (LEP) accelerator group for successful operation over the last decade. The members of the L3 collaboration and the LEP QCD Working Group provided me a stim- ulating working environment. In particular, I thank Pedro Abreu, Satyaki Bhattacharya, Gerard Bobbink, Ingrid Clare, Robert Clare, Glen Cowan, Aaron Dominguez, Dominique Duchesneau, John Field, Ian Fisk, Roger Jones, Mehnaz Hafeez, Stephan Kluth, Wolfgang Lohmann, Wes- ley Metzger, Peter Molnar, Oliver Passon, Martin Pohl, Subir Sarkar, Chris Tully and Micheal Unger.
    [Show full text]
  • The a to Z of Accelerators
    present explanation for this behav­ The long timescale needed to terparts. But superconductivity iour is that superconductivity exists produce acceptable conductors of above 77K provides a powerful in many discrete regions within niobium-tin (10-12 years) following stimulant to solve the technological the sample but only weak coupling its discovery in 1962 inevitably problems of dealing with brittle exists between these regions. This comes to mind in assessing the materials. The next few months weak coupling is strongly dimin­ potential timeîscales for developing could give us many more surprises ished by an external field. Electro­ high field magnets with the new in an area where none were sus­ magnetic and structural character­ materials. These new oxides, like pected only a few months ago. izations of these compounds are niobium-tin and the other A15 The discovery of Bednorz and proceeding furiously and we may compounds are inherently brittle Muller has given a profound new soon expect to know whether this and this is bound to affect their stimulus to superconductivity and percolative nature of the supercon­ application in magnets, just as the last discovery has surely not ductivity is inherent in the material large scale construction of niobium- yet been made. or results from the way present tin magnets has lagged behind samples are being prepared. their ductile niobium-titanium coun­ The A to Z of accelerators With great skill, the organizers physics but this information was 1965. The attendance of over of the 1987 Particle Accelerator surpassed in volume by reports 1100 was another reflection of Conference arranged a vast pro­ from the many other areas where the wealth of activity in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Powermod™1 the Power You Need Sm
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HIGH-ENERGY PHYSICS 1 PowerMod™ The Power You Need sm High Voltage.Solid-State Modulators At Diversified Technologies, we manufacture leading-edge solid state, high power modulators from our patented, modular design. PowerMod™ systems can meet your pulsed power needs - at up to 200 kV, with peak currents up to 2000 A. V PowerMod*™ HVPM 100-300 30 MWModulator (36" x 48" x 60") PowerMod™ HVPM 20-150 Pulse: 20 kV, 100A, ljis/div PowerMod™ Modulators deliver the superior benefits of solid state technology including: • Very high operating efficiencies • < 3V/kV voltage drop accross the switch PowerMod™ HVPM 20-300 6 MW Modulator (19" x 30" x 24") • <1mA leakage • Arbitrary pusewidths from less than 1 jus to DC • PRFsto30kHz • Opening and closing operation Call us or visit our website today to learn more about the PowerMod™ line of solid-state high power systems. DIVERSIFIED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 35 Wiggins Avenue Bedford, MA 01730 781-275-9444 www. d i vt ecs.com PowerMod*™ HVPM 2.5-150 3 75 KW Modulator (19" x 19.5" x 8.5") D 1999 Diversified Technologies, Inc. PowerMod™ is a trademark of Diversified Technologies, Inc. Contents Covering current developments in high- energy physics and related fields worldwide CERN Courier is distributed to Member State governments, institutes and laboratories affiliated with CERN, and to their personnel. It is published monthly except January and August, in English and French editions. The views expressed are not necessar­ ily those of the CERN management. CERN Editor: Gordon Fraser CERN,
    [Show full text]
  • Baryon Production in Z Decay
    Baryon Pro duction in Z Decay Christopher G Tully A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE FACULTY OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY RECOMMENDED FOR ACCEPTANCE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS January ABSTRACT How quarks b ecome conned into ordinary matter is a dicult theoretical question The p ointatwhich this o ccurs cannot b e measured by exp eriment but other prop erties related to connement can Baryon pro duction is a situation where one typ e of connement is chosen over another In this thesis pro duction rate measurements have b een p erformed for and baryons pro duced in hadronic decays of the Z The rates are low compared to meson pro duction but the particular prop erties of and decay allow these particles to be identied amongst the many mesons accompanying them The average number of and per hadronic Z decay was found to be D E N stat syst and D E N stat syst resp ectively These measurements take advantage of the unique photon detection capa bility of the L Exp eriment The rates are in agreement with those measured by other LEP detectors iii CONTENTS Abstract iii Acknowledgements v Intro duction Particle Creation and Detection Searching for Particle Decays Going Back in Time The History Behind SubNuclear Particles Quarks Discovery of the Pion The Quark Constituent Mo del
    [Show full text]
  • Nov/Dec 2020
    CERNNovember/December 2020 cerncourier.com COURIERReporting on international high-energy physics WLCOMEE CERN Courier – digital edition ADVANCING Welcome to the digital edition of the November/December 2020 issue of CERN Courier. CAVITY Superconducting radio-frequency (SRF) cavities drive accelerators around the world, TECHNOLOGY transferring energy efficiently from high-power radio waves to beams of charged particles. Behind the march to higher SRF-cavity performance is the TESLA Technology Neutrinos for peace Collaboration (p35), which was established in 1990 to advance technology for a linear Feebly interacting particles electron–positron collider. Though the linear collider envisaged by TESLA is yet ALICE’s dark side to be built (p9), its cavity technology is already established at the European X-Ray Free-Electron Laser at DESY (a cavity string for which graces the cover of this edition) and is being applied at similar broad-user-base facilities in the US and China. Accelerator technology developed for fundamental physics also continues to impact the medical arena. Normal-conducting RF technology developed for the proposed Compact Linear Collider at CERN is now being applied to a first-of-a-kind “FLASH-therapy” facility that uses electrons to destroy deep-seated tumours (p7), while proton beams are being used for novel non-invasive treatments of cardiac arrhythmias (p49). Meanwhile, GANIL’s innovative new SPIRAL2 linac will advance a wide range of applications in nuclear physics (p39). Detector technology also continues to offer unpredictable benefits – a powerful example being the potential for detectors developed to search for sterile neutrinos to replace increasingly outmoded traditional approaches to nuclear nonproliferation (p30).
    [Show full text]
  • Towards LHC Experiments
    Towards LHC experiments From 5-8 March, Evian-les-Bains on the shores of Lake Geneva was the scene of a major meeting on the experiments for CERN's planned LHC proton collider in the 27-kilome­ tre LEP tunnel. As plans for the LHC proton collider to be built in CERN's 27-kilometre LEP tunnel take shape, interest wid­ ens to bring in the experiments ex­ ploiting the big machine. The first public presentations of 'expressions of interest' for LHC experiments fea­ tured from 5-8 March at Evian-les-Bains on the shore of Lake Geneva, some 50 kilometres from CERN, at the special Towards the LHC Experimental Programme' meeting. (A report from the meeting will be included in our next issue.) This event followed soon after CERN Council's unanimous Decem­ ber 1991 vote that the LHC machine, to be installed in the existing 27-kilo­ metre LEP tunnel, is 'the right ma­ chine for the advance of the subject and for the future of CERN'. With de­ tailed information on costs, feasibility and prospective delivery schedules cial Detector Research and Develop­ Another will be reserved for the beam to be drawn up before the end of next ment Committee was set up along dump where the LHC protons will be year, and now with plans for experi­ the lines of traditional Experiments absorbed once the circulating beams ments under discussion, the prepara­ Committees, but this time with the are no longer required. This leaves tions for LHC move into higher gear. objective of stimulating and fostering room for two big new LHC collider The Evian meeting was a public forum the new technology needed to reap detectors, plus the potential of the for a full range of expressions of inter­ the LHC physics rewards (November existing LEP experimental areas, us­ est in LHC experiments, setting the 1991, page 2).
    [Show full text]
  • CERN End of LEP's Z
    Around the Laboratories A superconducting radiofrequency accelera­ tion cavity for CERN's LEP2 electron-positron collider leaves the preparation area en route to installation in the ring. (Photo CERN HI28.9.85) cholesterol cleansing therapies, parasitology, unique biological cell culture substrates, bacteria and virus filtration, etc. The Brookhaven Tandem is a good example of an accelerator designed for physics research for which addi­ tional parallel applications have been developed, to the mutual benefit of both the applications and the original research mission. Success in such endeavours demands recognition of the substantial differences between scientific and industrial requirements, and a considerable investment in time and effort to develop and install the specialized facilities. Peter Thieberger machine's first circulating beam. The increase the luminosity by squeezing 30,000 Z decays recorded by each in more bunches. In 1993, the 'pret­ experiment in 1989 confirmed that zel' scheme (October 1992, page CERN matter comes in just three distinct 17), so called because of the shape families of quarks and leptons. traced out by the circulating beams, End of LEP's Z era The values of the Z mass and width was running with eight bunches per quoted in 1990 were 91.161 ± 0.031 beam, and helped LEP to further chapter of history at CERN's GeV and 2.534 ± 0.027 GeV. By the tighten the precision of the Z fix. A LEP electron-positron collider beginning of 1995, these had been As new skills were mastered, the closed in October when the four big fine-tuned to the extraordinary 27-kilometre circumference machine experiments, Aleph, Delphi, L3 and accuracy of 91.1884 ± 0.0022 GeV became a remarkable precision Opal, logged their final data at the Z and 2.4963 ± 0.0032 GeV, and when instrument.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Perspectives at CERN 3 Unprecedented Accuracy
    Future Perspectives at CERN John Ellis1 Theoretical Physics Division, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Abstract. Current and future experiments at CERN are reviewed,with emphasis on those relevant to astrophysics and cosmology. These include experiments related to nuclear astrophysics, matter-antimatter asymmetry, dark matter, axions, gravitational waves, cosmic rays, neutrino oscillations, inflation, neutron stars and the quark-gluon plasma. The centrepiece of CERN’s future programme is the LHC, but some ideas for perspectives after the LHC are also presented. CERN-TH/2002-119 astro-ph/0206054 Talk given at the CERN-ESA-ESO Symposium, M¨unchen, April 2002 1 Outline The scientific mission of CERN is to provide Europe with unique accelerators for the study of the fundamental particles of matter and the interactions between them. The scientific programme of CERN for the next decade is centred on the LHC accelerator, which is scheduled for completion in 2006, so that its experi- ments can start taking in 2007. A description of the LHC scientific programme is the centrepiece of this talk. The motivations for this and other new accelera- tors provided by ideas about possible physics beyond the Standard Model were discussed earlier at this meeting [1]. Between now and the startup of the LHC, CERN has a very limited pro- gramme of running experiments. However, scientific diversity at CERN is en- hanced by a number of recognized experiments, that do not use the CERN ac- celerators and are not supported by CERN, but whose scientists are allowed to use other CERN facilities. In parallel with the construction of the LHC, CERN arXiv:astro-ph/0206054v1 4 Jun 2002 is also preparing to send a long-baseline neutrino beam to the Gran Sasso under- ground laboratory in Italy, in a special programme largely supported by extra contributions from interested countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement of the W → Eν Cross Section with Early Data from the CMS Experiment at CERN
    Imperial College London Blackett Laboratory High Energy Physics Measurement of the W eν cross section ! with early data from the CMS experiment at CERN Nikolaos Rompotis A thesis submitted to Imperial College London for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy and the Diploma of Imperial College. January 2011 Abstract The Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) is a general purpose detector designed to study proton-proton collisions, and heavy ion collisions, delivered by the Large Hadron Col- lider (LHC) at the European Laboratory for High Energy Physics (CERN). This thesis describes a measurement of the inclusive W eν cross section at 7 TeV centre of mass ! energy with 2:88 0:32 pb−1 of LHC collision data recorded by CMS between March ± and September 2010. W boson decays are identified by the presence of a high-pT electron that satisfies selec- tion criteria in order to reject electron candidates due to background processes. Electron selection variables are studied with collision data and found to be in agreement with expectations from simulation. A fast iterative technique is developed to tune electron selections based on these variables. Electron efficiency is determined from simulation and it is corrected from data using an electron sample from Z decays. The number of W candidates is corrected for remaining background events using a fit to the missing transverse energy distribution. The measured value for the inclusive W production cross section times the branching ratio of the W decay in the electron channel is: σ(pp W +X) BR(W eν) = 10:04 0:10(stat) 0:52(syst) 1:10(luminosity) nb; ! × ! ± ± ± which is in excellent agreement with theoretical expectations.
    [Show full text]