DOCSLIB.ORG

Towards LHC Experiments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Towards LHC Experiments Towards LHC experiments From 5-8 March, Evian-les-Bains on the shores of Lake Geneva was the scene of a major meeting on the experiments for CERN's planned LHC proton collider in the 27-kilome­ tre LEP tunnel. As plans for the LHC proton collider to be built in CERN's 27-kilometre LEP tunnel take shape, interest wid­ ens to bring in the experiments ex­ ploiting the big machine. The first public presentations of 'expressions of interest' for LHC experiments fea­ tured from 5-8 March at Evian-les-Bains on the shore of Lake Geneva, some 50 kilometres from CERN, at the special Towards the LHC Experimental Programme' meeting. (A report from the meeting will be included in our next issue.) This event followed soon after CERN Council's unanimous Decem­ ber 1991 vote that the LHC machine, to be installed in the existing 27-kilo­ metre LEP tunnel, is 'the right ma­ chine for the advance of the subject and for the future of CERN'. With de­ tailed information on costs, feasibility and prospective delivery schedules cial Detector Research and Develop­ Another will be reserved for the beam to be drawn up before the end of next ment Committee was set up along dump where the LHC protons will be year, and now with plans for experi­ the lines of traditional Experiments absorbed once the circulating beams ments under discussion, the prepara­ Committees, but this time with the are no longer required. This leaves tions for LHC move into higher gear. objective of stimulating and fostering room for two big new LHC collider The Evian meeting was a public forum the new technology needed to reap detectors, plus the potential of the for a full range of expressions of inter­ the LHC physics rewards (November existing LEP experimental areas, us­ est in LHC experiments, setting the 1991, page 2). This scheme was de­ ing either adapted LEP experiments stage for the submission of Letters of liberately set up before global detec­ or new apparatus mounted in push- Intent later this year and cementing tor designs emerged, so that the final pull to alternate with LEP running. the proto-collaboration arrangements. configurations would benefit from this At Evian, four major detectors for So that all interested physicists can new technology. studying proton-proton collisions eventually access LHC, another im­ As well as its main objective of pro­ were being tabled, three of which are portant aim of the Evian meeting was ton-proton collisions, LHC also opens new, and one a development from an to acquaint the potential physics up possibilities for ion-ion collisions, existing LEP experiment. community with the full range of pro­ for fixed target studies and eventually The ASCOT (Apparatus with posals and ideas. As well as plans for electron-proton collisions as well. Superconducting Toroids) general for experiments, participants at the Most of these areas were covered at purpose detector is proposed by a meeting also heard the latest news on Evian. team from CERN, the UK (Edinburgh LHC machine studies, and the think­ LHC beams can in principle collide and Rutherford Appleton Laboratory), ing on preparations for experimental at eight points. Four of these coincide Germany (Wuppertal and Munich areas and LHC physics potential. with the four big experiments at the MPI and University), France (Saclay) CERN is very aware of the chal­ LEP electron-positron collider. Of the and Russia (Moscow, Dubna and lenges of the LHC for its detectors - remaining four points, one, deep un­ Protvino). It is based on a 24 metre- handling collision rates more than a der the Jura mountains, will have to long superconducting toroid thousand times those of existing be used for an LHC 'beam cleaning' instrumented with drift tubes for pre­ colliders and having to withstand in­ system to ensure high performance cision muon detection. tense radiation levels. In 1990, a spe­ by reducing troublesome beam halo. Inside the magnet, the emphasis is CERN Courier, April 1992 1 FINLAND AT CERN Industrial exhibition at the main building 31 March - 3 April 1992 ORGANISER THE FINNISH FOREIGN TRADE ASSOCIATION P.O.Box 908 SF-00101 HELSINKI Tel +358 0 695 91 Fax +358 0 694 0028 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS ORNTECH \VO INTERNATIONAL LTD kIoInIe TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTRE FINLAND O outokumpu copper mm SUPERCONDUCTORS Helsinki University of Technology TUMO The Institute of Particle Physics O outokumpu copper CJEFT RAUMA-REPOLA PORI RESEARCH INSTITUTE OFFSHORE DRAWN PRODUCTS DIVISION FOR HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS M VALMET 78 Circle advertisement number on reader service form CERN Courier, April 1992 Around the Prince K. Malhotra of Bombay's Tata Laboratories Institute of Fundamental Research died while attending the Evian meet­ ing. A tribute will appear in the May issue. on electrons, with a lead/liquid argon arsenide) strip detectors and electromagnetic calorimeter, and microstrip gas chambers, to ensure CERN tracking through interleaved layers of good pattern recognition under the scintillators and transition radiation stringent LHC conditions. Also inside LEP in the Alps detectors, with semiconductor pads the coil is a high resolution electro­ close to the beam pipe. A 1.5T su­ magnetic calorimeter and a hadron perconducting solenoid in front of the calorimeter. With CERN's 27-kilometre LEP elec­ electromagnetic calorimeter distin­ CMS involves a team from 12 tron-positron collider shut down for guishes electrons and positrons. CERN Member States, plus the winter, LEP specialists met in Hadron calorimetry uses iron and liq­ Byelorussia, Bulgaria, Estonia, Geor­ Chamonix in the French Alps from uid argon. gia, Hungary, Russia and the US. A 19-25 January to review the ma­ The EAGLE (Experiment for Accu­ wide range of ongoing R and D work chine's 1991 performance (January/ rate Gamma, Lepton and Energy examines the possible detector tech­ February, page 6) and to look at measurements) collaboration pro­ nologies before deciding on final so­ ways of improving it. poses a comprehensive detector to lutions. Nine specialist areas were covered cover a wide range of physics, and The L3 experiment at LEP was - operations, instrumentation, ma­ already involves physicists from 14 originally designed for use at both chine optics, the 'pretzl' scheme to CERN Member States, plus Canada, LEP and LHC, with a large experi­ increase the number of colliding Russia, Australia, Brazil and Israel. mental hall and magnet. Upgrade for bunches, energy calibration and po­ EAGLE foresees a powerful inner LHC would involve improving the larization, beam-beam interactions, electron detector inside a 2T central muon resolution, adding a fine-grain optics for the LEP2 energy upgrade, superconducting solenoid. The de­ hadron calorimeter, increasing the and radiofrequency to power LEP2. sign features high quality electromag­ magnetic field, and being able to lift Operational experience had shown netic sampling calorimetry combined the detector 120 centimetres from the the machine's limitations. While the with fine-grained electron and photon LEP position to the LHC beams total number of collisions in 1991 was preshower detection, a high precision above. For the work, 39 institutes twice that of the previous year, actual vertex detector for lower collision from the L3 LEP line-up have been beam intensity had not changed sig­ rates, hadron calorimetry, and a con­ joined by 20 more, mainly from China nificantly. Experience had also ventional toroid muon spectrometer. and the former Soviet bloc. shown the need for better measure­ Many different detector technolo­ Supplementing the main proton-pro­ ments of machine optics parameters. gies are under study, and a final ton LHC programme are a range of A long list of problems await further choice of the specification for the other experiments, including fixed investigation, and the machine physi­ various EAGLE components will be target studies. Expressions of inter­ cists warn that experiments may made when R and D work is com­ est received so far include ideas for have to learn to live with higher back­ plete. two neutrino experiments and three grounds if beam intensities are to be The Compact Muon Solenoid studies concentrating on CP-violation improved. (CMS) LHC detector is designed to in B-particle decays, one using a In the instrumentation sector, the be compatible with the highest LHC gas-jet target, one using extracted specially developed streak camera collision rates, and is built around a beams and one a colliding-beam had shown its worth in investigating 15 m-long superconducting solenoid setup. little understood beam behaviour, providing a 4T field. The strong field Although not the spearhead of LHC and will be better exploited with a di­ gives relatively compact muon meas­ physics, ion-ion collisions will still rect link to the control room. urement. R and D work for the muon play a major role, continuing a CERN From the start, LEP has continually detectors is looking at resistive plate tradition in this field (page 8). For ion tried different tuning schemes to find chambers and parallel plate cham­ collisions, three teams are interested an optimal working point, with 'split' bers for timing information and hon­ - one using CMS, another using the horizontal and vertical tunes being eycomb strip chambers and wall-less (suitably modified) Delphi experiment popular. Additional options are to drift chambers for spatial information. at LEP, and a third using a new dedi­ change the phase of the transverse The central tracker will use small cated detector. (betatron) oscillations. Each choice cells, based on silicon (or gallium has advantages and disadvantages, CERN Courier, April 1992 3 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HERA Collisions CERN LHC Magnets
    The Gallex (gallium-based) solar neutrino experiment in the Gran Sasso underground Laboratory in Italy has seen evidence for neutrinos from the proton-proton fusion reaction deep inside the sun. A detailed report will be published in our next edition. again, with particles taken to 26.5 aperture models are also foreseen to GeV and initial evidence for electron- CERN test coil and collar assemblies and a proton collisions being seen. new conductor distribution will further Earlier this year, the big Zeus and LHC magnets improve multipole components. H1 detectors were moved into A number of other models and position to intercept the first HERA With test magnets for CERN's LHC prototypes are being built elsewhere collisions, and initial results from this proton-proton collider regularly including a twin-aperture model at new physics frontier are eagerly attaining field strengths which show the Japanese KEK Laboratory and awaited. that 10 Tesla is not forbidden terri­ another in the Netherlands (FOM-UT- tory, attention turns to why and NIHKEF). The latter will use niobium- where quenches happen. If 'training' tin conductor, reaching for an even can be reduced, superconducting higher field of 11.5 T. At KEK, a magnets become easier to commis­ single aperture configuration was sion. Tests have shown that successfully tested at 4.3 K, reaching quenches occur mainly at the ends of the short sample limit of the cable the LHC magnets. This should be (8 T) in three quenches. This magnet rectifiable, and models incorporating was then shipped to CERN for HERA collisions improvements will soon be reassem­ testing at the superfluid helium bled by the industrial suppliers.
    [Show full text]
  • Trigger and Data Acquisition
    Trigger and data acquisition N. Ellis CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Abstract The lectures address some of the issues of triggering and data acquisition in large high-energy physics experiments. Emphasis is placed on hadron-collider experiments that present a particularly challenging environment for event se- lection and data collection. However, the lectures also explain how T/DAQ systems have evolved over the years to meet new challenges. Some examples are given from early experience with LHC T/DAQ systems during the 2008 single-beam operations. 1 Introduction These lectures concentrate on experiments at high-energy particle colliders, especially the general- purpose experiments at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) [1]. These experiments represent a very chal- lenging case that illustrates well the problems that have to be addressed in state-of-the-art high-energy physics (HEP) trigger and data-acquisition (T/DAQ) systems. This is also the area in which the author is working (on the trigger for the ATLAS experiment at LHC) and so is the example that he knows best. However, the lectures start with a more general discussion, building up to some examples from LEP [2] that had complementary challenges to those of the LHC. The LEP examples are a good reference point to see how HEP T/DAQ systems have evolved in the last few years. Students at this school come from various backgrounds — phenomenology, experimental data analysis in running experiments, and preparing for future experiments (including working on T/DAQ systems in some cases). These lectures try to strike a balance between making the presentation accessi- ble to all, and going into some details for those already familiar with T/DAQ systems.
    [Show full text]
  • India-CMS Newsletter Member Institutes/ Universities of India-CMS
    India-CMS Newsletter Member Institutes/ Universities of India-CMS Vol 1. No. 1, July 2015 1. Nuclear Physics Division (NPD) Bhabha Atomic Research Center (BARC) Mumbai http://www.barc.gov.in/ First volume produced at: 2. Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Department of Physics Pune http://www.iiserpune.ac.in Panjab University Sector 14 Chandigarh - 160014 3. Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar http:// www.iitbbs.ac.in 4. Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Bombay Mumbai http://www.iitb.ac.in/en/education/academic-divisions 5. Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Madras Chennai https://www.iitm.ac.in 6. School of Physical Sciences National Institute of Science Education and Research (NISER), Edited and Compiled by: Bhubaneswar http://physics.niser.ac.in/ Manjit Kaur Department of Physics 7. Department of Physics Panjab University Panjab University Chandigarh Chandigarh http://physics.puchd.ac.in/ [email protected] 8. Division of High Energy Nuclear and Particle Physics Ajit Mohanty Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics (SINP) Director Kolkata http://www.saha.ac.in/web/henppd-home Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics (SINP) Kolkatta 9. Department of High Energy Physics [email protected] Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR), Mumbai http://www.tifr.res.in/ ~dhep/ Abhimanyu Chawla Department of Physics 10. Department of Physics & Astrophysics Panjab University University of Delhi Chandigarh Delhi http://www.du.ac.in/du/index.php?page=physics-astrophysics [email protected] 11. Visva Bharti Santiniketan, West Bengal 731204 http://www.visvabharati.ac.in/Address.html 1 2 Contents Message ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 Message .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • QCD Studies at L3
    QCD Studies at L3 Swagato Banerjee Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai 400 005 2002 QCD Studies at L3 Swagato Banerjee Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai 400 005 A Thesis submitted to the University of Mumbai for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics March, 2002 To my parents Acknowledgement It has been an extremely enlightening and enriching experience working with Sunanda Banerjee, supervisor of this thesis. I would like to thank him for his forbearance and encouragement and for teaching me the different aspects of the subject with lots of patience. I thank all the members of the Department of High Energy Physics of Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR) for providing various facilities and support, and ideal ambiance for research. In particular, I would like to thank B.S. Acharya, T. Aziz, Sudeshna Banerjee, B.M. Bellara, P.V. Deshpande, S.T. Divekar, S.N. Ganguli, A. Gurtu, M.R. Krishnaswamy, K. Mazumdar, M. Maity, N.K. Mondal, V.S. Narasimham, P.M. Pathare, K. Sudhakar and S.C. Tonwar. Asesh Dutta, Dilip Ghosh, S. Gupta, Krishnendu Mukherjee, Sreerup Ray Chaudhuri, D.P. Roy, Sourov Roy, Gavin Salam and K. Sridhar provided valuable theoretical insight on various occasions. My heartfelt thanks to them. I thank the European Organisation for Nuclear Research (CERN) for its kind hospitality and all the members of the Large Electron Positron (LEP) accelerator group for successful operation over the last decade. The members of the L3 collaboration and the LEP QCD Working Group provided me a stim- ulating working environment. In particular, I thank Pedro Abreu, Satyaki Bhattacharya, Gerard Bobbink, Ingrid Clare, Robert Clare, Glen Cowan, Aaron Dominguez, Dominique Duchesneau, John Field, Ian Fisk, Roger Jones, Mehnaz Hafeez, Stephan Kluth, Wolfgang Lohmann, Wes- ley Metzger, Peter Molnar, Oliver Passon, Martin Pohl, Subir Sarkar, Chris Tully and Micheal Unger.
    [Show full text]
  • The a to Z of Accelerators
    present explanation for this behav­ The long timescale needed to terparts. But superconductivity iour is that superconductivity exists produce acceptable conductors of above 77K provides a powerful in many discrete regions within niobium-tin (10-12 years) following stimulant to solve the technological the sample but only weak coupling its discovery in 1962 inevitably problems of dealing with brittle exists between these regions. This comes to mind in assessing the materials. The next few months weak coupling is strongly dimin­ potential timeîscales for developing could give us many more surprises ished by an external field. Electro­ high field magnets with the new in an area where none were sus­ magnetic and structural character­ materials. These new oxides, like pected only a few months ago. izations of these compounds are niobium-tin and the other A15 The discovery of Bednorz and proceeding furiously and we may compounds are inherently brittle Muller has given a profound new soon expect to know whether this and this is bound to affect their stimulus to superconductivity and percolative nature of the supercon­ application in magnets, just as the last discovery has surely not ductivity is inherent in the material large scale construction of niobium- yet been made. or results from the way present tin magnets has lagged behind samples are being prepared. their ductile niobium-titanium coun­ The A to Z of accelerators With great skill, the organizers physics but this information was 1965. The attendance of over of the 1987 Particle Accelerator surpassed in volume by reports 1100 was another reflection of Conference arranged a vast pro­ from the many other areas where the wealth of activity in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Powermod™1 the Power You Need Sm
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HIGH-ENERGY PHYSICS 1 PowerMod™ The Power You Need sm High Voltage.Solid-State Modulators At Diversified Technologies, we manufacture leading-edge solid state, high power modulators from our patented, modular design. PowerMod™ systems can meet your pulsed power needs - at up to 200 kV, with peak currents up to 2000 A. V PowerMod*™ HVPM 100-300 30 MWModulator (36" x 48" x 60") PowerMod™ HVPM 20-150 Pulse: 20 kV, 100A, ljis/div PowerMod™ Modulators deliver the superior benefits of solid state technology including: • Very high operating efficiencies • < 3V/kV voltage drop accross the switch PowerMod™ HVPM 20-300 6 MW Modulator (19" x 30" x 24") • <1mA leakage • Arbitrary pusewidths from less than 1 jus to DC • PRFsto30kHz • Opening and closing operation Call us or visit our website today to learn more about the PowerMod™ line of solid-state high power systems. DIVERSIFIED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 35 Wiggins Avenue Bedford, MA 01730 781-275-9444 www. d i vt ecs.com PowerMod*™ HVPM 2.5-150 3 75 KW Modulator (19" x 19.5" x 8.5") D 1999 Diversified Technologies, Inc. PowerMod™ is a trademark of Diversified Technologies, Inc. Contents Covering current developments in high- energy physics and related fields worldwide CERN Courier is distributed to Member State governments, institutes and laboratories affiliated with CERN, and to their personnel. It is published monthly except January and August, in English and French editions. The views expressed are not necessar­ ily those of the CERN management. CERN Editor: Gordon Fraser CERN,
    [Show full text]
  • Baryon Production in Z Decay
    Baryon Pro duction in Z Decay Christopher G Tully A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE FACULTY OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY RECOMMENDED FOR ACCEPTANCE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS January ABSTRACT How quarks b ecome conned into ordinary matter is a dicult theoretical question The p ointatwhich this o ccurs cannot b e measured by exp eriment but other prop erties related to connement can Baryon pro duction is a situation where one typ e of connement is chosen over another In this thesis pro duction rate measurements have b een p erformed for and baryons pro duced in hadronic decays of the Z The rates are low compared to meson pro duction but the particular prop erties of and decay allow these particles to be identied amongst the many mesons accompanying them The average number of and per hadronic Z decay was found to be D E N stat syst and D E N stat syst resp ectively These measurements take advantage of the unique photon detection capa bility of the L Exp eriment The rates are in agreement with those measured by other LEP detectors iii CONTENTS Abstract iii Acknowledgements v Intro duction Particle Creation and Detection Searching for Particle Decays Going Back in Time The History Behind SubNuclear Particles Quarks Discovery of the Pion The Quark Constituent Mo del
    [Show full text]
  • Nov/Dec 2020
    CERNNovember/December 2020 cerncourier.com COURIERReporting on international high-energy physics WLCOMEE CERN Courier – digital edition ADVANCING Welcome to the digital edition of the November/December 2020 issue of CERN Courier. CAVITY Superconducting radio-frequency (SRF) cavities drive accelerators around the world, TECHNOLOGY transferring energy efficiently from high-power radio waves to beams of charged particles. Behind the march to higher SRF-cavity performance is the TESLA Technology Neutrinos for peace Collaboration (p35), which was established in 1990 to advance technology for a linear Feebly interacting particles electron–positron collider. Though the linear collider envisaged by TESLA is yet ALICE’s dark side to be built (p9), its cavity technology is already established at the European X-Ray Free-Electron Laser at DESY (a cavity string for which graces the cover of this edition) and is being applied at similar broad-user-base facilities in the US and China. Accelerator technology developed for fundamental physics also continues to impact the medical arena. Normal-conducting RF technology developed for the proposed Compact Linear Collider at CERN is now being applied to a first-of-a-kind “FLASH-therapy” facility that uses electrons to destroy deep-seated tumours (p7), while proton beams are being used for novel non-invasive treatments of cardiac arrhythmias (p49). Meanwhile, GANIL’s innovative new SPIRAL2 linac will advance a wide range of applications in nuclear physics (p39). Detector technology also continues to offer unpredictable benefits – a powerful example being the potential for detectors developed to search for sterile neutrinos to replace increasingly outmoded traditional approaches to nuclear nonproliferation (p30).
    [Show full text]
  • NIKHEF Annual Report 2003
    NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND HIGH-ENERGY PHYSICS ANNUAL REPORT 2003 Kruislaan 409, 1098 SJ Amsterdam P.O. Box 41882, 1009 DB Amsterdam Colofon Publication edited for NIKHEF: Address: Postbus 41882, 1009 DB Amsterdam Kruislaan 409, 1098 SJ Amsterdam Phone: +31 20 592 2000 Fax: +31 20 592 5155 E-mail: [email protected] Editors: Louk Lapik´as,Marcel Vreeswijk & Auke-Pieter Colijn Layout & art-work: Kees Huyser Cover Photograph: Relativistic fluid mechanics: impression of a fluid current moving on a sphere where scalar fields live. URL: http://www.nikhef.nl NIKHEF is the National Institute for Nuclear Physics and High-Energy Physics in the Netherlands, in which the Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter (FOM), the Universiteit van Amsterdam (UvA), the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VUA), the Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen (KUN) and the Universiteit Utrecht (UU) collaborate. NIKHEF co-ordinates and supports all activities in experimental subatomic (high-energy) physics in the Netherlands. NIKHEF participates in the preparation of experiments at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, notably Atlas, LHCb and Alice. NIKHEF is actively involved in experiments in the USA (D∅ at Fermilab, BaBar at SLAC and STAR at RHIC), in Germany at DESY (Zeus, Hermes and Hera-b) and at CERN (Delphi, L3 and the heavy-ion fixed-target programme). Furthermore astroparticle physics is part of NIKHEF’s scientific programme, in particular through participation in the ANTARES project: a detector to be built in the Mediterranean. Detector R&D, design and construction of detectors and the data-analysis take place at the laboratory located in Sciencepark Amsterdam as well as at the participating universities.
    [Show full text]
  • CERN End of LEP's Z
    Around the Laboratories A superconducting radiofrequency accelera­ tion cavity for CERN's LEP2 electron-positron collider leaves the preparation area en route to installation in the ring. (Photo CERN HI28.9.85) cholesterol cleansing therapies, parasitology, unique biological cell culture substrates, bacteria and virus filtration, etc. The Brookhaven Tandem is a good example of an accelerator designed for physics research for which addi­ tional parallel applications have been developed, to the mutual benefit of both the applications and the original research mission. Success in such endeavours demands recognition of the substantial differences between scientific and industrial requirements, and a considerable investment in time and effort to develop and install the specialized facilities. Peter Thieberger machine's first circulating beam. The increase the luminosity by squeezing 30,000 Z decays recorded by each in more bunches. In 1993, the 'pret­ experiment in 1989 confirmed that zel' scheme (October 1992, page CERN matter comes in just three distinct 17), so called because of the shape families of quarks and leptons. traced out by the circulating beams, End of LEP's Z era The values of the Z mass and width was running with eight bunches per quoted in 1990 were 91.161 ± 0.031 beam, and helped LEP to further chapter of history at CERN's GeV and 2.534 ± 0.027 GeV. By the tighten the precision of the Z fix. A LEP electron-positron collider beginning of 1995, these had been As new skills were mastered, the closed in October when the four big fine-tuned to the extraordinary 27-kilometre circumference machine experiments, Aleph, Delphi, L3 and accuracy of 91.1884 ± 0.0022 GeV became a remarkable precision Opal, logged their final data at the Z and 2.4963 ± 0.0032 GeV, and when instrument.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Perspectives at CERN 3 Unprecedented Accuracy
    Future Perspectives at CERN John Ellis1 Theoretical Physics Division, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Abstract. Current and future experiments at CERN are reviewed,with emphasis on those relevant to astrophysics and cosmology. These include experiments related to nuclear astrophysics, matter-antimatter asymmetry, dark matter, axions, gravitational waves, cosmic rays, neutrino oscillations, inflation, neutron stars and the quark-gluon plasma. The centrepiece of CERN’s future programme is the LHC, but some ideas for perspectives after the LHC are also presented. CERN-TH/2002-119 astro-ph/0206054 Talk given at the CERN-ESA-ESO Symposium, M¨unchen, April 2002 1 Outline The scientific mission of CERN is to provide Europe with unique accelerators for the study of the fundamental particles of matter and the interactions between them. The scientific programme of CERN for the next decade is centred on the LHC accelerator, which is scheduled for completion in 2006, so that its experi- ments can start taking in 2007. A description of the LHC scientific programme is the centrepiece of this talk. The motivations for this and other new accelera- tors provided by ideas about possible physics beyond the Standard Model were discussed earlier at this meeting [1]. Between now and the startup of the LHC, CERN has a very limited pro- gramme of running experiments. However, scientific diversity at CERN is en- hanced by a number of recognized experiments, that do not use the CERN ac- celerators and are not supported by CERN, but whose scientists are allowed to use other CERN facilities. In parallel with the construction of the LHC, CERN arXiv:astro-ph/0206054v1 4 Jun 2002 is also preparing to send a long-baseline neutrino beam to the Gran Sasso under- ground laboratory in Italy, in a special programme largely supported by extra contributions from interested countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement of the W → Eν Cross Section with Early Data from the CMS Experiment at CERN
    Imperial College London Blackett Laboratory High Energy Physics Measurement of the W eν cross section ! with early data from the CMS experiment at CERN Nikolaos Rompotis A thesis submitted to Imperial College London for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy and the Diploma of Imperial College. January 2011 Abstract The Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) is a general purpose detector designed to study proton-proton collisions, and heavy ion collisions, delivered by the Large Hadron Col- lider (LHC) at the European Laboratory for High Energy Physics (CERN). This thesis describes a measurement of the inclusive W eν cross section at 7 TeV centre of mass ! energy with 2:88 0:32 pb−1 of LHC collision data recorded by CMS between March ± and September 2010. W boson decays are identified by the presence of a high-pT electron that satisfies selec- tion criteria in order to reject electron candidates due to background processes. Electron selection variables are studied with collision data and found to be in agreement with expectations from simulation. A fast iterative technique is developed to tune electron selections based on these variables. Electron efficiency is determined from simulation and it is corrected from data using an electron sample from Z decays. The number of W candidates is corrected for remaining background events using a fit to the missing transverse energy distribution. The measured value for the inclusive W production cross section times the branching ratio of the W decay in the electron channel is: σ(pp W +X) BR(W eν) = 10:04 0:10(stat) 0:52(syst) 1:10(luminosity) nb; ! × ! ± ± ± which is in excellent agreement with theoretical expectations.
    [Show full text]