Mcnary National Wildlife Refuge U.S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mcnary National Wildlife Refuge U.S McNary National Wildlife Refuge U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service McNary National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan / Comprehensive Conservation Plan Management Direction Management Direction Mid-Columbia National Wildlife Refuge Complex 64 Maple Street Burbank, WA 99323 Phone 509/546 8300 Refuge Information 1 800/344 WILD December 2008 The mission of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is working with others to conserve, protect, and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. All photos ©C and G Bartlett Photography Dec. 2008 Vision for the McNary National Wildlife Refuge Stretching along the bend in the middle Columbia River where the waters of the Snake and Walla Walla Rivers join the Columbia, the McNary National Wildlife Refuge links a network of diverse habitats stretching dozens of miles from Richland, Washington, to the Wallula Gap and beyond. The Refuge’s shrub-steppe, basalt cliff, riparian, river islands and aquatic habitats will be managed to fulfill the needs of native fish, wildlife, and plants. By actively restoring habitat, controlling exotic species, and enhancing existing habitats and resources, the Refuge will serve as an anchor for biodiversity and a model for habitat restoration and land management. Just as the Columbia River is an important corridor for the transportation of people and goods, it is also an important natural corridor for migratory birds and fish, including endangered salmon and steelhead stocks. Food, rest and sanctuary will be provided for large concentrations of migratory and wintering waterfowl and shorebirds using the Refuges each year. Extensive corridors of riparian and floodplain habitat will be restored and enhanced for nesting and migrating neo-tropical songbirds. Management and enhancement of the Refuge’s waters, shorelines, channels and bays will contribute to the needs and recovery of endangered salmon and steelhead passing through and rearing in Refuge waters. By reaching out to neighbors and building strategic partnerships, the Refuge will seek new and innovative ways to conserve and protect fish and wildlife resources along the entire stretch of river. Wildlife abundance and well planned and high quality interpretive facilities will attract thousands of visitors to the Refuges. We will work with partners and volunteers to provide a wide range of high quality recreational and environmental education programs, build Refuge support, and attract visitors. Encouraging an understanding of and appreciation for the Refuge and the mid-Columbia River environment will be a focus of the McNary Refuge for generations to come. Disclaimer CCPs provide long term guidance for management decisions and set forth goals, objectives, and strategies needed to accomplish refuge purposes and identify the Service's best estimate of future needs. These plans detail program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes. The plans do not constitute a commitment for staffing increases, operational and maintenance increases or funding for future land acquisition. McNary National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan Northern pintail – Dave Menke/USFWS Prepared by: Mid-Columbia River National Wildlife Refuge Complex 64 Maple Street Burbank, Washington 99323 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Division of Planning, Visitor Services, and Transportation 911 NE 11th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97232 McNary Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introduction 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Summary of Comprehensive Conservation Plan..................................................................... 1-1 1.3 National Wildlife Refuge System Laws and Directives.......................................................... 1-3 1.4 Establishment History and Purposes of McNary Refuge ..................................................... 1-7 1.5 Future Refuge Plans.................................................................................................................... 1-12 1.6 Issues, Concerns, and Opportunities......................................................................................... 1-12 Chapter 2. Management Direction 2.1 Considerations in Refuge Planning ...........................................................................................2-1 2.2 General Guidelines ....................................................................................................................... 2-2 2.3 Goals, Objectives, and Strategies............................................................................................... 2-4 Goal 1. Manage high quality food and sanctuary to support large concentrations of migratory waterfowl ................................................................................................... 2-6 Goal 2. Provide secure and productive foraging and nesting habitats for a diversity of shorebirds..................................................................................................................... 2-9 Goal 3. Contribute to the recovery of endangered, threatened, and sensitive species by protecting, maintaining, or increasing suitable habitats.................................. 2-12 Goal 4. Provide a diversity of high quality wetland habitats for the benefit of migratory birds and other wetland plants and animals......................................... 2-15 Goal 5. Provide high quality riparian habitats for the benefit of nesting and migrating birds, fish, riparian plants, and other riparian wildlife ....................... 2-18 Goal 6. Protect the integrity of the biological resources of the river islands .................. 2-21 Goal 7. Conserve and restore the plants, animals and shrub-steppe community representative of historic Columbia Basin habitats............................................... 2-23 Goal 8. Protect and maintain the ecological integrity of talus, outcropping, and cliff habitats for natural levels of species diversity........................................................ 2-28 Goal 9. Visitors and local residents enjoy, value, learn about, and support the Refuge 2-30 Goal 10. Hunters appreciate and experience a variety of quality hunting opportunities 2-34 Goal 11. Anglers experience abundant opportunities to catch fish while appreciating the Refuge .................................................................................................................... 2-37 Goal 12. Students and teachers understand and value the Refuge System, and the ecology and management of McNary National Wildlife Refuge.......................... 2-39 Goal 13. Manage cultural resources for their educational, scientific, and cultural values for the benefit of present and future generations of Refuge users and communities ................................................................................................................. 2-41 Appendices Appendix B. Compatibility Determinations ................................................................................... B-1 Maps Map 1 Vicinity Map Map 2 Refuge Boundary and Land Status Map 3 Habitat Management Actions under Final CCP Map 4 Public Use Features under Final CCP Map 5 Overall Hunt Area i McNary Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan Map 6 Main Habitats and Ecotypes Map 7 Key Waterfowl Use Areas Tables Table 1-1. McNary Refuge Units – Status and Acreage .............................................................. 1-11 Table 2-1. Summary of CCP Actions ...............................................................................................2-4 Great blue heron / USFWS ii Great blue heron, USFWS CHAPTER 1. Introduction Three American Avocets Landing - © Tim Bush McNary Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan 1.1 Introduction When first encountered by Lewis and Clark and early settlers in the Pacific Northwest, the Columbia River was enormous, wild, and seemingly uncontrollable. Yet for all its enormous flows, the river was nearly unusable in its native state as a source of irrigation water. Early settlers found that agriculture was nearly impossible in most of the hot, arid Columbia Plateau (Dietrich 1995). A grassroots effort to provide water for struggling small farmers culminated in the construction of Grand Coulee Dam. When it was completed in 1941, it was–at that time–the largest concrete structure ever built anywhere in the world. Successful construction of it and the other initial Columbia River dams led to increased confidence and enhanced expectations for development of the water and hydroelectric resources in the basin. Within a few decades, more than 400 dams had been constructed, including 11 run-of-the-river dams on the mainstem, and hundreds of major and modest structures on tributaries. These dams tapped into a large portion—21 million kilowatts—of the Columbia's generating capacity. The Columbia River is now considered the most hydroelectrically developed river system in the world (Dietrich 1995). McNary National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge) was established subsequent to the authorization of McNary Lock and Dam on the mainstem of the middle Columbia River, as part of the Federal Columbia River Power System. McNary Refuge is located upstream of the McNary Lock and Dam, on waters of the impounded Columbia River known
Recommended publications
  • Flood Basalts and Glacier Floods—Roadside Geology
    u 0 by Robert J. Carson and Kevin R. Pogue WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Information Circular 90 January 1996 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENTOF Natural Resources Jennifer M. Belcher - Commissioner of Public Lands Kaleen Cottingham - Supervisor FLOOD BASALTS AND GLACIER FLOODS: Roadside Geology of Parts of Walla Walla, Franklin, and Columbia Counties, Washington by Robert J. Carson and Kevin R. Pogue WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Information Circular 90 January 1996 Kaleen Cottingham - Supervisor Division of Geology and Earth Resources WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Jennifer M. Belcher-Commissio11er of Public Lands Kaleeo Cottingham-Supervisor DMSION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Raymond Lasmanis-State Geologist J. Eric Schuster-Assistant State Geologist William S. Lingley, Jr.-Assistant State Geologist This report is available from: Publications Washington Department of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Earth Resources P.O. Box 47007 Olympia, WA 98504-7007 Price $ 3.24 Tax (WA residents only) ~ Total $ 3.50 Mail orders must be prepaid: please add $1.00 to each order for postage and handling. Make checks payable to the Department of Natural Resources. Front Cover: Palouse Falls (56 m high) in the canyon of the Palouse River. Printed oo recycled paper Printed io the United States of America Contents 1 General geology of southeastern Washington 1 Magnetic polarity 2 Geologic time 2 Columbia River Basalt Group 2 Tectonic features 5 Quaternary sedimentation 6 Road log 7 Further reading 7 Acknowledgments 8 Part 1 - Walla Walla to Palouse Falls (69.0 miles) 21 Part 2 - Palouse Falls to Lower Monumental Dam (27.0 miles) 26 Part 3 - Lower Monumental Dam to Ice Harbor Dam (38.7 miles) 33 Part 4 - Ice Harbor Dam to Wallula Gap (26.7 mi les) 38 Part 5 - Wallula Gap to Walla Walla (42.0 miles) 44 References cited ILLUSTRATIONS I Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Interior Columbia Basin Mollusk Species of Special Concern
    Deixis l-4 consultants INTERIOR COLUMl3lA BASIN MOLLUSK SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN cryptomasfix magnidenfata (Pilsbly, 1940), x7.5 FINAL REPORT Contract #43-OEOO-4-9112 Prepared for: INTERIOR COLUMBIA BASIN ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT PROJECT 112 East Poplar Street Walla Walla, WA 99362 TERRENCE J. FREST EDWARD J. JOHANNES January 15, 1995 2517 NE 65th Street Seattle, WA 98115-7125 ‘(206) 527-6764 INTERIOR COLUMBIA BASIN MOLLUSK SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN Terrence J. Frest & Edward J. Johannes Deixis Consultants 2517 NE 65th Street Seattle, WA 98115-7125 (206) 527-6764 January 15,1995 i Each shell, each crawling insect holds a rank important in the plan of Him who framed This scale of beings; holds a rank, which lost Would break the chain and leave behind a gap Which Nature’s self wcuid rue. -Stiiiingfieet, quoted in Tryon (1882) The fast word in ignorance is the man who says of an animal or plant: “what good is it?” If the land mechanism as a whole is good, then every part is good, whether we understand it or not. if the biota in the course of eons has built something we like but do not understand, then who but a fool would discard seemingly useless parts? To keep every cog and wheel is the first rule of intelligent tinkering. -Aido Leopold Put the information you have uncovered to beneficial use. -Anonymous: fortune cookie from China Garden restaurant, Seattle, WA in this “business first” society that we have developed (and that we maintain), the promulgators and pragmatic apologists who favor a “single crop” approach, to enable a continuous “harvest” from the natural system that we have decimated in the name of profits, jobs, etc., are fairfy easy to find.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Geology Released Since [Project Chief: W
    ·- July 1983 Volume 11 Number 3 Washington Geologic Newsletter · . Lovitt mine, near Wenatchee, Chelan County, Washington, 1977. Photo by Jack Jansons BRIAN J . BOYLE COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS ART STEARNS, Supervisor RAYMOND LASMANIS, State Geologist DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Marlin Woy - To Porllond n Exit IOs·• [" GEOLOGY ANO /. t Roctl)11onl•t ... Solllh EARTH ~CES i..-<-....<....<c.L..'-'-! !! 0 I u Sound .. C 'Entrance- Moll Elf!H~~• · 0Poulsot\S. Mortin\ s,. : ••••• ,Porklno .....~ :....... ----. ........... .................... • • • • •• • • • • Coll•o• Z ·········o····· ... 4224 6th Ave. S.E., Lacey, Washington in Albortson• MAILING ADDRESS: Department of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Earth Resources Olympia, WA 98504 (206) 459-6372 Field office address: Department of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Earth Resources Spokane County Agricultural Center N. 222 Havana Spokane, WA 99202 ( 509) 458-2038 Lauta Btay, Editor The Washington Geologic Newsletter, a quarterly report of geologlc articles, Ts published by the Division of Geology and Earth Resources, Department of Natural Resources. The newsletter is free upon request. The division also publishes bulletins, information circulars, and geologic maps. A list of these publicatiOflS will be sent upon request. .. THE WENATCHEE GOLD RUSH by Bonnie Bunning* INTRODUCTION from the D ''reef" between 1949 and 1967. For a long time the ore was shipped directly to the Tacoma smelter On March 4, 19831 when Breakwater Resources LLd. where a substantial credit for the siliceous ores (used as and Asamera Minerals, Inc., made their exciting gold find flux in the smelter) helped make t he mine profitable. In public, companies and individuals from Canada and the 1961, Day Mines, Inc., and Lovitt Mining Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Walla Walla Subbasin Assessment
    Walla Walla Subbasin Assessment General Overview Components Prepared by: Walla Walla Basin Watershed Council Version 2: April 2004 Note: This document was not reviewed or approved by the Subbasin Planning Team, subbasin plan leads, co-managers, or subbasin technical staff. 1 Introduction History and Description of Planning Entity The organization for developing the Walla Walla River Subbasin Plan was comprised of the lead agencies, subcontractors, the Planning Team, the Technical Team, and other governmental and non-governmental organizations that will provide local input. The role of each member group is described below. Lead Agencies and Co-Lead Agency The lead agency for the Oregon portion of the Walla Walla subbasin was the Walla Walla Basin Watershed Council, with the Walla Walla Watershed Foundation serving as its fiscal agent. The co-lead entity for the Washington portion of the subbasin was Walla Walla County. The responsibility of co-leads was to oversee and initiate the planning process and ensure that it was an open and inclusive and there was proper outreach to and input from subbasin stakeholders. Subcontractors The Co-lead entities subcontracted with consultant(s) to perform the following functions: (1) facilitation assistance, (2) public involvement assistance, and (3) report preparation including technical assistance. The consultants’ roles were to facilitate and assist with the coordination of Technical and Planning Team and Working Group meetings. The consultants worked closely with the Technical and Planning Teams and the Working Group, and compiled, edited, and wrote (as appropriate) various sections of all draft and final versions of the assessment, inventory, and management plan components of the subbasin plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7. Parks and Recreation Element
    1 Chapter 7. Parks and Recreation Element 2 7.1. Introduction 3 Parks, recreational facilities, and open space are generally considered beneficial resources and 4 essential contributors to a community’s quality of life. Located within the County are a number 5 of different types of parks and recreational facilities. 6 The County has not traditionally served as a provider of park and recreation facilities. Local 7 cities, private agencies, federal agencies, and schools have an established history of furnishing 8 these services. 9 The purpose of this element is to evaluate parks and recreation facilities in the County and to 10 develop goals and policies that guide management and coordination of them. 11 7.1.1. Applicable Growth Management Act Goals 12 GMA planning goals that are applicable to the Parks and Recreation Element include the 13 following: 14 . Open space and recreation. Retain open space, enhance recreational opportunities, conserve 15 fish and wildlife habitat, increase access to natural resource lands and water, and develop 16 parks and recreation facilities (Revised Code of Washington [RCW] 36.70A.020(9)). 17 . Public facilities and services. Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to 18 support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development 19 is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally 20 established minimum standards (RCW 36.70A.020(12)). 21 . Historic preservation. Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites, and structures 22 that have historical or archaeological significance (RCW 36.70A.020(13)). 23 Goals described in the Shoreline Management Act (SMA) also support the Parks and Recreation 24 Element.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERIOR/GEOLOGICAL SURVEY USGS· INF -72- 2 !R I) - Electric City-Grand Coulee, Washington the CHANNELED SCABLANDS of EASTERN WASHINGTON
    9 INTERIOR/GEOLOGICAL SURVEY USGS· INF -72- 2 !R I) - Electric City-Grand Coulee, Washington THE CHANNELED SCABLANDS OF EASTERN WASHINGTON - The Geologic Story of the Spokane Flood- '(( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE , 1976 0 -208-172 F'or sale by the uperint.endent. of Documents, .S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.. 20402- Pric~ 70 cents Lock No. 024 - 001-02507- I nL nlog o. I 19.2: W27/6/974 There is n minimum charge of $1.00 for each mail order A trave ler enterin g th e tal f W as hington fro m th e Eas t crosses a flat-to-rolling country­ sid o f deep, fertil so il commonly sown with w heat. ontinuing wes twa rd , he abruptly nters a d eply scar red land o f bare bl a k ro k ut by labyrin thine ca nyons and chann el , plunge pools and ro k bas in s, ca ca de and ca tara t ledges, and di playi ng ragged buttes and li ffs, alcoves, im­ men e gravel bars, and giant ripple marks. Th e traveler has reached the starkly sceni " Chan­ neled cab lands," and this d ramatic hange in th e landscape may well ca use him to w onder " w hat happ n d here? " Th e answ er- th e grea te t fl ood documented by man. This publica tion, summari zin g th e equence of geologic events that culminated in th e so-call ed ''Spokan Fl ood," w as prepar d in res ponse to a ge neral int re t in geology and a particul ar interes t in th e o ri gin of th e Scab land o ften ex pre sed by th ose ross in g th e State of W as hington.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SPOKANE AQUIFER, WASHINGTON: Its Geologic Origin
    THE SPOKANE AQUIFER, WASHINGTON: Its Geologic Origin and Water-Bearing and Water-Quality Characteristics Cover: Aerial view of the Spokane Flood sweep­ ing southwesterly across the study area (outlined in red) and vicinity. THE SPOKANE AQUIFER, WASHINGTON: Its Geologic Origin and Water-Bearing and Water-Quality Characteristics By Dee Molenaar U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 2265 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAULHODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1988 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section, U.S. Geological Survey, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Molenaar, Dee. The Spokane aquifer, Washington. (U.S. Geological Survey water-supply paper; 2265) Bibliography: p. Supt.ofDocs.no. : 119.13:2265 1. Aquifers Washington (State) Spokane Region. I. Title. II. Series. GB1199.3.W2M651987 553.7'9'0979737 84-600259 PREFACE: WHY THIS REPORT WAS WRITTEN This report was prepared to provide a non­ The description of the Spokane aquifer technical description and understanding of the includes the geologic story behind its origin Spokane aquifer, one of the world's most pro­ and its part in the Spokane Valley's hydrologic ductive water-bearing formations. Because the setting. Discussed are the relation among pre­ aquifer also has a most fascinating geologic ori­ cipitation over the area (mostly in the head­ gin, a discussion of the geologic story of the waters of the Spokane River basin), the flow of Spokane area is presented. This should enhance the Spokane River, and the movement of the reader's appreciation of the natural proces­ water to, through, and from the aquifer.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Trails Association » $4.50
    Plant a hiker’s garden, p.26 See orcas, p.34 Stay hydrated, p.31 WASHINGTON TRAILS March + April 2010 » A Publication of Washington Trails Association www.wta.org » $4.50 Reading the Rocks: Interpreting the Geologic Forces that Shape Washington’s Landscape Take Steps Into Wilderness With WTA, p.12 Day Hikes and Cheap Sleeps, p.28 Hiker’s Primavera Pasta, p.35 » Table of Contents March+April 2010 Volume 46, Issue 2 News + Views The Front Desk » Elizabeth Lunney An attempt at expressing gratitude. » p.4 The Signpost » Lace Thornberg If your life on trail was an album, which days would you play again? » p.5 Hiking News » Updates on Cape Horn, the Ice Age Floods National Geologic Trail, the Stehekin Road and more. » p.6 4 WTA at Work Holly Chambers Trail Work » Alan Carter Mortimer WTA’s volunteer crew leaders show dedication. » p.10 On the Web » Susan Elderkin Spring is here. Where will you be hiking? » p.14 Action for Trails » Kindra Ramos “Rookies” prove to be great lobbyists for DNR funding. » p.16 19 Membership News » Rebecca Lavigne Fireside Circle members meet winemakers, swap trail tales. » p.18 On Trail Special Feature » Volunteer Geologists A look at the geologic forces that have sculpted Washington. » p.19 Maggie Brewer Feature » Pam Roy Yard work is okay, but not when it stands in the way of hiking. » p.26 Feature » Lauren Braden Not ready to pull out the tent? Check out these trailside B and B’s. » p.28 Backcountry The Gear Closet » Allison Woods Learn more about your bladder.
    [Show full text]
  • Field-Trip Guide to the Vents, Dikes, Stratigraphy, and Structure of the Columbia River Basalt Group, Eastern Oregon and Southeastern Washington
    Field-Trip Guide to the Vents, Dikes, Stratigraphy, and Structure of the Columbia River Basalt Group, Eastern Oregon and Southeastern Washington Scientific Investigations Report 2017–5022–N U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Palouse Falls, Washington. The Palouse River originates in Idaho and flows westward before it enters the Snake River near Lyons Ferry, Washington. About 10 kilometers north of this confluence, the river has eroded through the Wanapum Basalt and upper portion of the Grande Ronde Basalt to produce Palouse Falls, where the river drops 60 meters (198 feet) into the plunge pool below. The river’s course was created during the cataclysmic Missoula floods of the Pleistocene as ice dams along the Clark Fork River in Idaho periodically broke and reformed. These events released water from Glacial Lake Missoula, with the resulting floods into Washington creating the Channeled Scablands and Glacial Lake Lewis. Palouse Falls was created by headward erosion of these floodwaters as they spilled over the basalt into the Snake River. After the last of the floodwaters receded, the Palouse River began to follow the scabland channel it resides in today. Photograph by Stephen P. Reidel. Field-Trip Guide to the Vents, Dikes, Stratigraphy, and Structure of the Columbia River Basalt Group, Eastern Oregon and Southeastern Washington By Victor E. Camp, Stephen P. Reidel, Martin E. Ross, Richard J. Brown, and Stephen Self Scientific Investigations Report 2017–5022–N U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7. Parks and Recreation Element
    Chapter 7. Parks and Recreation Element 7.1. Introduction Parks, recreational facilities, and open space are generally considered beneficial resources and essential contributors to a community’s quality of life. Parks and recreation services are most often provided by federal, State, and local governments. The purpose of this element is to evaluate parks and recreation services in the County and to develop goals and policies that guide management and coordination of parks and recreation facilities, programs and opportunities. The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires that a park and recreation element be consistent with the capital facilities element, and that it estimate local park and recreation demand, evaluate facilities and services needs, and evaluate intergovernmental coordination opportunities (Revised Code of Washington [RCW] 36.70A.070 (8)). 7.1.1. Applicable Growth Management Act Goals GMA planning goals that are applicable to the Parks and Recreation element include the following: Open space and recreation. Retain open space, enhance recreational opportunities, conserve fish and wildlife habitat, increase access to natural resource lands and water, and develop parks and recreation facilities. (RCW 36.70A.020 (9)) Public facilities and services. Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards. (RCW 36.70A.020 (10)) Historic preservation. Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites, and structures that have historical or archaeological significance. (RCW 36.70A.020 (13)) Goals described in the Shoreline Management Act (SMA) also support the Parks and Recreation Element.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeologic Framework and Selected Components of the Groundwater Budget for the Upper Umatilla River Basin, Oregon
    Prepared in cooperation with Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation Hydrogeologic Framework and Selected Components of the Groundwater Budget for the Upper Umatilla River Basin, Oregon Scientific Investigations Report 2017–5020 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: View of upper Umatilla River Basin looking north into Buckaroo Canyon, Oregon. Photograph by Terrence Conlon, U.S. Geological Survey, October 15, 2004. Hydrogeologic Framework and Selected Components of the Groundwater Budget for the Upper Umatilla River Basin, Oregon By Nora B. Herrera, Kate Ely, Smita Mehta, Adam J. Stonewall, John C. Risley, Stephen R. Hinkle, and Terrence D. Conlon Prepared in cooperation with Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation Scientific Investigations Report 2017–5020 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey William H. Werkheiser, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2017 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Newport Wallula Power Project Contribution to Regional Haze
    Newport Wallula Power Project Contribution to Regional Haze This study examines the potential contribution of Newport’s Wallula Power Project to regional haze in Class I Areas within the BPA Service Area, the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area (CRGNSA), and the Mt. Baker Wilderness. Regional haze impacts are assessed following the techniques used in a Regional Air Quality Modeling Study1 conducted by BPA. BPA’s study examined potential air quality impacts associated with over forty recently proposed power projects in the Service Area. The Regional Air Quality Modeling Study suggests the proposed power projects including the Wallula Power Project would probably not significantly contribute to sulfur and nitrogen deposition in Class I areas, the Class I PSD Increments, regional Class II PSD Increments or regional concentrations in excess of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The model simulations did suggest the proliferation of proposed projects in the Service Area could potentially degrade visibility within Class I and Scenic Areas should all the projects become operational. Based on the results of the Regional Air Quality Modeling Study, BPA is now examining potential cumulative regional haze impacts on a case-by-case basis for each new project before issuing a Record of Decision (ROD). Since it is unlikely all the proposed power plants will be built, the analysis investigates the cumulative impacts from a Baseline Source Group consisting of projects that have all ready been issued a ROD, other recently permitted power projects not requesting access to BPA’s transmission grid but within the Service Area, and the facility being considered for a ROD.
    [Show full text]