Demystifying the Digital Divide Author(S): Mark Warschauer Source: Scientific American, Vol

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Demystifying the Digital Divide Author(S): Mark Warschauer Source: Scientific American, Vol Demystifying the Digital Divide Author(s): Mark Warschauer Source: Scientific American, Vol. 289, No. 2 (AUGUST 2003), pp. 42-47 Published by: Scientific American, a division of Nature America, Inc. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/26060401 Accessed: 05-06-2018 13:38 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: http://www.jstor.org/stable/26060401?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms Scientific American, a division of Nature America, Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Scientific American This content downloaded from 129.252.86.83 on Tue, 05 Jun 2018 13:38:29 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms By Mark Warschauer Demystifying Digitalthe Divide The simple binary notion of technology haves and have-nots doesn’t quite compute For much of the past decade, policy leaders and social scientists have grown increasingly concerned about a so- cietal split between those with and those without access to computers and the In- ternet. The U.S. National Telecommuni- cations and Information Ad- ministration popularized a term for this situation in the mid-1990s: the “digital di- vide.” The phrase soon became used in an international context as well, to describe the status of information technology from country to country. TOM DRAPER DESIGN 42 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN AUGUST 2003 This content downloadedCOPYRIGHT from 2003 129.252.86.83 SCIENTIFIC on AMERICAN, Tue, 05 Jun INC.2018 13:38:29 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms LEFT TO RIGHT: NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, DAVID GREEDY, PHOTODISC, PHOTODISC (top row); PHOTODISC (all photographs in second row); PHOTODISC, PHOTODISC, MARK WARSCHAUER (third row); PHOTODISC, PHOTODISC, KEITH DANNEMILLER Corbis/SABA ( fourth row); KEITH DANNEMILLER Corbis/SABA, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, PHOTODISC, PHOTODISC (fifth row); PHOTODISC, PHOTODISC, VIVIAN MOOS Corbis (bottom row) This content downloadedCOPYRIGHT from 2003 129.252.86.83 SCIENTIFIC on AMERICAN,Tue, 05 Jun 2018INC. 13:38:29 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Underlying disparities are real, both the ‘digital divide’ framing is that it tends broader health and education campaigns within and among countries. The Benton to connote ‘digital solutions,’” that is, around the world.) Foundation, which promotes the public- “computers and telecommunications,” This perspective is known in academ- interest use of communications technolo- without a consideration of the context ic circles as technological determinism, gy, reports that by late 2001, 80 percent into which that hardware would be put. the idea that the mere presence of tech- of American families with annual house- This line of reasoning led some to as- nology leads to familiar and standard ap- hold income greater than $75,000 were sume that the dearth of digital access of plications of that technology, which in online, compared with 25 percent of the nations, communities and individuals turn bring about social change. The Har- poorest U.S. families. Total home Inter- could be easily tackled by an infusion of vard Graduate School of Education’s net access was 55 percent for whites, 31 computers and Internet connections. For- Christopher Dede has termed this the percent for African-Americans and 32 mer Speaker of the U.S. House of Repre- “fire” model, with its implication that a percent for Hispanics. Looking at the in- sentatives Newt Gingrich has talked computer, by its mere presence, will gen- ternational picture, in most African coun- about the virtues of giving every child a erate learning or development, just as a tries less than 1 percent of the population laptop computer, without offering a sol- fire generates warmth. Governments, the is online. Not surprisingly, such dispari- id plan for using the devices. And Bill private sector, foundations and charities Some assumed that the dearth of digital access could be easily tackled by an infusion of computers. ty correlates highly with other measures Gates donated computers to small-town have thus spent hundreds of millions of of social and economic inequality. libraries across America, believing that dollars to bridge the perceived digital di- Yet the simple binary description of a Internet connections would help stem the vide by providing computers and Inter- divide fails to do justice to the complex exodus from rural areas. Although Inter- net lines to those in need, often without reality of various people’s differing access net connection through small-town li- sufficient attention to the social contexts and usage of digital technology. An braries has improved people’s lives by al- in which these technologies might be American who surfs the Internet on a lowing them to stay in touch with friends used. (Dede notes that a better model computer at a local library once a month and relatives, it has not stemmed the ex- than fire might be clothing, which also might be considered to be a digital “have- odus—which largely depends on broad- keeps one warm yet is tailored for indi- not,” whereas someone in a developing er factors, such as employment availabil- vidual fit and use.) country with the same profile would be a ity—and may even have contributed to it How does this application based on “have.” Indeed, couching the condition by allowing people to search for jobs in the assumption of technological deter- in black-and-white terminology can lead cities. (To Gates’s and Gingrich’s credit, minism turn out in practice? Over the those attempting to deal with technolog- they at least had the issue of technology past few years, I have traveled around the ical inequities down the wrong path. The access on their radar screens. Gates, rec- world to study community technology late Rob Kling, who directed the Center ognizing the limitations of computer programs in both developed and devel- for Social Informatics at Indiana Univer- technology in solving social ills, has since oping countries. I have observed scores of sity, put it well: “[The] big problem with gone on to donate billions of dollars to diverse programs and have interviewed hundreds of participants and organizers. As the following case studies show, two Overview/Technologic Logic basics became apparent: well-intentioned ■ The concept of a “digital divide” separating those with access to computers and programs often lead in unexpected direc- communications technology from those without is simplistic and can lead to tions, and the worst failures occur when well-meaning but incomplete attempts at a solution based on merely adding people attempt to address complex social technology to a given circumstance. problems with a narrow focus on provi- ■ In fact, people have widely varying opportunities for access to computers and sion of equipment. communications technology and disparate reasons for wanting the level of access they may desire. A Minimalist Approach ■ A consideration of how people can use computers and the Internet to further the IN 1999 THE MUNICIPAL govern- process of social inclusion is paramount in any effort to install new technology ment of New Delhi, in collaboration with into an environment lacking it. an Indian company called the National Institute of Information Technology, 44 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN AUGUST 2003 This content downloadedCOPYRIGHT from 2003 129.252.86.83 SCIENTIFIC on AMERICAN, Tue, 05 Jun INC.2018 13:38:29 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms work is suffering.” In short, the commu- nity came to realize that minimally inva- sive education was, in practice, minimal- ly effective education. Nevertheless, an overemphasis on hardware with scant attention paid to the pedagogical and curricular frameworks that shape how the computers are used is common in educational technology proj- ects throughout the world. But such tech- nological determinism has been chal- lenged in the academic arena by a con- cept called social informatics, which argues that technology must be consid- ered within a specific context that in- cludes hardware, software, support re- sources, infrastructure, as well as people in various roles and relationships with one another and with other elements of NEW DELHI CHILDREN experiment with what is literally a hole-in-the-wall computer in 2000. The the system. And the technology and so- minimally invasive education project was designed to insert technology into the environment so that the children would learn to use the computer without guidance. Without direction, however, the cial system continuously shape each oth- computer proved for the most part to be merely a high-tech toy. er, like a biological community and its environment. launched an experiment to provide com- difficult. Most poor communities in New Although grassroots teachers, parents puter access to children in one of the Delhi already have organizations that or aid workers may be unfamiliar with city’s poorest areas. Government officials work with children and that could have the academic term “social informatics,” and representatives of the company set set up educational training at a different many already appreciate the implications up an outdoor kiosk with several com- kind of computer center, but their par- of an interwoven relationship of technol- puter stations. The computers, with dial- ticipation was neither solicited nor wel- ogy and public organizations. Social in- up Internet access, were inside a locked comed.
Recommended publications
  • EPAA Vol. 8 No. 4 Warschauer: Technology and School Reform Di
    Education Policy Analysis Archives Volume 8 Number 4 January 7, 2000 ISSN 1068-2341 A peer-reviewed scholarly electronic journal Editor: Gene V Glass, College of Education Arizona State University Copyright 2000, the EDUCATION POLICY ANALYSIS ARCHIVES . Permission is hereby granted to copy any article if EPAA is credited and copies are not sold. Articles appearing in EPAA are abstracted in the Current Index to Journals in Education by the ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation and are permanently archived in Resources in Education . Technology and School Reform: A View from Both Sides of the Tracks Mark Warschauer America-Mideast Educational & Training Services Cairo, Egypt Abstract A discourse of reform claims that schools must be transformed to take full advantage of computers, while a competing discourse of inequality warns that technology-enhanced reform is taking place only in wealthy schools, dooming poor and minority students to the wrong side of a digital divide. A qualitative study at an elite private school and an impoverished public school explored the relationship between technology, reform, and equality. The reforms introduced at the two schools appeared similar, but underlying differences in resources and expectations served to reinforce patterns by which the two schools channel students into different social futures. As educators cope with the task of integrating information technology into the schools, two main discourses have appeared: the discourse of reform and the discourse of inequality. The discourse of reform suggests that schools must transform themselves in order to make effective use of computers. As an educator in Hawai'i (Note 1) commented, The analogy that I have to give is that there is television and there is radio 1 of 22 and there is in person.
    [Show full text]
  • Qt9hx124s9 Nosplash 083D343
    PAPER UNDER REVIEW: PLEASE DO NOT DISTRIBUTE OR USE RESULTS WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED PERMISSION OF THE LEAD AUTHOR: MARK WARSCHAUER [email protected] Broadening our Concepts of Universal Access Mark Warschauer Professor of Education & Informatics Associate Dean, School of Education University of California, Irvine School of Education 3200 Education Irvine, CA 92697-5500 Email: [email protected] and Veronica Ahumada Newhart Graduate Student Researcher University of California, Irvine School of Education 3200 Education Irvine, CA 92697-5500 Email: [email protected] Abstract: The universal accessibility movement has focused on solutions for people with physical limitations. While this work has helped bring about positive initiatives for this population, physical disabilities are just one of the many life situations that can complicate people’s ability to fully participate in an information economy and society. Other factors affecting accessibility include poverty, illiteracy, and social isolation. This paper explores how the universal accessibility movement can expand its efforts to reach other diverse populations. We discuss four sets of resources -- physical, digital, human, and social -- that are critical for enabling people to use information and communication technology, and provide some examples of how these resources can help people access, adapt, and create knowledge. Keywords: universal access; accessibility; communication; education 1 PAPER UNDER REVIEW: PLEASE DO NOT DISTRIBUTE OR USE RESULTS WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED PERMISSION OF THE LEAD AUTHOR: MARK WARSCHAUER [email protected] Introduction As Manuel Castells (1998) notes, the ability to access, use, and adapt information and communication technologies is “the critical factor in generating and accessing wealth, power, and knowledge in our time” (p.
    [Show full text]
  • 117 Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. By
    Reviews 117 Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. By Mark Warschauer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003. 274 pp. ISBN 0262232243. Mark Warschauer provides a wide-ranging, provocative re-evaluation of the “digital divide,” which he prefers to describe as a complex, multi-layered “digital inequality.” His point of view and sympathies clearly bridge the two academic disciplines with which he is most closely associated—education and computer science—in which he has a cross appointment at the University of California, Irvine. Citing fascinating examples from his own and other international research, he points out that despite some well-laid plans for access to information and communication technology (ICT), much remains to be done to ensure that technological and information “literacy” are also guaranteed. Poorly designed implementation programs are largely to blame for digital inequality, as Warschauer points out in examples from Ireland (where in one case, more—not less— social disenfranchisement was encountered by unemployed, isolated ICT users after they stopped going to the unemployment office and instead used ICT at home to look for work); from India (where no instruction was provided after ICT was placed in public areas); and from Egypt (where a USAID project was so mishandled that computer hardware sat in storage for more than a year before anything tangible got under way). In what has become a remarkably effective political-economic method of evaluating technology adoption and diffusion, Warschauer refers to three “industrial revolutions” (in the eighteenth, nineteenth, and twentieth centuries) that have had huge impacts on society, the economy, and the further development of technology.
    [Show full text]
  • From Telecollaboration to Virtual Exchange: State-Of-The‑Art and the Role of Unicollaboration in Moving Forward1
    From telecollaboration to virtual exchange: state-of-the-art and the role of UNICollaboration in moving forward1 Robert O’Dowd2 Abstract elecollaboration, or ‘virtual exchange’, are terms used to refer to the engagement of groups of learners in online intercultural interactions and collaboration projects with partners from other cultural contexts or geographical locations as an integrated Tpart of their educational programmes. In recent years, approaches to virtual exchange have evolved in different contexts and different areas of education, and these approaches have had, at times, very diverse organisational structures and pedagogical objectives. This article provides an overview of the different models and approaches to virtual exchange which are currently being used in higher education contexts. It also provides a short historical review of the major developments and trends in virtual exchange to date and describes the origins of the UNICollaboration organisation and the rationale behind this journal. Keywords: virtual exchange; telecollaboration; online intercultural exchange; computer mediated communication; intercultural communication; internationalisation. 1. Parts of this article were previously published in an article by the same author (O’Dowd, 2017) which appeared in the TLC Journal - Training Language & Culture, 4(2). They have been reproduced with permission. 2. University of León, León, Spain; [email protected] Robert O’Dowd has published widely on the application of collaborative online learning in university education. His most recent publication is the co-edited volume Online Intercultural Exchange Policy, Pedagogy, Practice, for Routledge. He is currently the lead researcher on the Erasmus+ KA3 project, Evaluating and Upscaling Telecollaborative Teacher Education (EVALUATE) (http://www.evaluateproject.eu/).
    [Show full text]
  • Plenary Speeches/Invited Papers, Conferences in 2009
    英語教學 English Teaching & Learning 34. 1 (Spring 2010): 147-166 Plenary Speeches/Invited Papers, Conferences in 2009 2009 American Association for Applied Linguistics (AAAL) Conference Time: March 6-9, 2009 Place: Denver, Colorado Theme: The Relevance of Applied Linguistics to the Real World and to Other Fields of Scientific Inquiry Keynote Speeches: (1) Lyle Bachman University of California, Los Angeles, US Toward an 'Activist' Applied Linguistics (2) Ellen Bialystok York University, Toronto, Canada Interactions of Language Processing and Cognitive Control in Bilingualism (3) Guy Cook The Open University, UK Sweet Talking: Food, Language, and Democracy (4) Graham Crookes University of Hawai'i, US The Relevance of SL Critical Pedagogy (5) Rod Ellis University of Auckland, New Zealand Second Language Acquisition: Theory, Research and Language Pedagogy 英語教學 English Teaching & Learning 34.1 (Spring 2010) (6) Heidi Hamilton Georgetown University, US Life as a Linguist Among Clinicians: Learnings from Cross-disciplinary Collaborations 2009 International Conference and Workshop on TEFL and Applied Linguistics Time: : March 13-14, 2009 Place: Ming Chuan University, Taiwan Theme: Teacher Empowerment and Language Acquisition in EFL Contexts Plenary Speeches: (1) Brian Huot Kent State University, US Reconsidering Assessment for the Teaching and Learning of Writing (2) Stephen Krashen University of South California, US Anything but (3) Sandra J. Savignon Penn State University, US The Quest for Communicative Competence: Theory and Classroom Practice
    [Show full text]
  • Dissecting the “Digital Divide”: a Case Study in Egypt
    The Information Society, 19: 297–304, 2003 Copyright c Taylor & Francis Inc. ISSN: 0197-2243 print / 1087-6537 online DOI: 10.1080/01972240390227877 Dissecting the “Digital Divide”: A Case Study in Egypt Mark Warschauer Department of Education, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA tion (NGO) download information for her. The notion of a For the last decade, the concept of a “digital divide” has framed binary divide is thus inaccurate and can be patronizing, as it people’s understanding of technology’s relationship to equity and fails to value the social resources that diverse groups bring development. This article critiques theoretically the digital divide to the table. For example, in the United States, African- concept and supports this critique by examining a case study of Americans are often portrayed as being on the wrong end technology and education in Egypt. The study illustrates the social of a digital divide (e.g., Walton, 1999), when in fact In- embeddedness of technology and the intertwining of computer ac- ternet access among Blacks and other minorities varies cess with broader issues of political power, thus refuting simplistic tremendously by income group, with divisions between notions of divides to be overcome through provision of equipment. Blacks and Whites decreasing as income increases (Na- tional Telecommunications and Information Administra- Keywords digital divide, education, Egypt, international tion, 2000). Second, and even more significantly, the stratification that does exist regarding access to online information has very little to do with the Internet per se, but has everything Since first emerging nearly a decade ago, the concept of to do with political, economic, institutional, cultural, and a “digital divide” has captured the attention of policy mak- linguistic contexts that shape the meaning of the Internet ers and social activities.
    [Show full text]
  • English Teaching Forum Magazine January 2002, Volume 40, Number 4
    02-0246 ETF_02-09 12/6/02 8:48 AM Page 2 William P. Ancker UNITED STATES TheChallenge Opportunityand of echnology: ANTINTERVIEW WITH MARK WARSCHAUER MARK WARSCHAUER IS VICE CHAIR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AT THE University of California, Irvine and a faculty associate at the university’s Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations. He has previously taught and conducted research at the University of California (Berkeley), the University of Hawaii, Moscow Linguistics University, and Charles University (Prague). Dr. Warschauer’s research focuses on the role of information and communication technologies (ICT) in second/foreign language learning and teaching; the impact of ICT on literacy; and the relationship of ICT to institutional reform, democracy, and social development. He is the founding editor of the journal Language Learning & Technology and editor of the Papyrus News email list. This interview was conducted by the editor-in-chief of the Forum on April 9, 2002 at the international TESOL convention held in Salt Lake City, Utah. 2 O CTOBER 2002 E NGLISH T EACHING F ORUM 02-0246 ETF_02-09 12/6/02 8:48 AM Page 3 WPA: Can you tell us how your career in second/foreign lan- net but not necessarily on the World Wide Web. Now, of guage teaching began? course, with Hotmail and Yahoo Mail, many people are MW: After I graduated from college, I traveled in Mexico doing email and chatting on the Web and that’s why there’s and Central America and learned some Spanish. My first confusion between the two. Technically, the Internet is the job when I came back was as a Spanish bilingual teacher broader communications protocol that allows people to aide in an elementary school in San Francisco helping stu- connect to the World Wide Web, and the Web is a just a dents with math and English.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing Effective Education Programs Using Information and Communication Technology (ICT)
    First Principles: Designing Effective Education Programs Using Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Compendium Credit: American Institutes for Research This First Principles: Designing Effective Education Programs Using Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Compendium provides important overview guidance for designing and implementing education programs that use technology. The principles and indicators are primarily meant to guide program designs, including the development of requests for and subsequent review of proposals, the implementation of program activities, and the development of performance management plans, evaluations, and research studies. The First Principles are intended to help USAID education officers specifically, as well as other stakeholders—including staff in donor agencies, government officials, and staff working for international and national non-governmental organizations—take advantage of good practices and lessons learned to improve projects that involve the use of education technology. The guidance in this document is meant to be used and adapted for a variety of settings to help USAID officers and others grapple with the multiple dimensions of ICT in education and overcome the numerous challenges in applying ICT in the developing-country contexts. The last section provides references for those who would like to learn more about issues and methods for supporting the education of the underserved. This document is based on extensive experience in, and investigation of, current approaches to technology in education and draws on research literature, interviews with USAID field personnel, and project documentation. It also includes profiles of projects funded by USAID and others. ThisCompendium provides greater depth for those who are interested in knowing more on this topic. A shorter companion piece called a Digest provides a brief overview of key considerations in the planning and implementation of education technology projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide
    Warchauer/mechanical 12/4/02 10:10 AM Page 1 Technology and Social Inclusion Rethinking the Digital Divide “An impassioned, thoughtful, and unique analysis of the digital divide that incorporates T Mark Warschauer echnology and Social Inclusion evidence from affluent and poor nations. Warschauer shows that social context, far more than hardware, shapes access to new technologies.” Much of the discussion about new technologies and Larry Cuban, School of Education, Stanford University social equality has focused on the oversimplified notion of a “digital divide.” Technology and Social “The modern belief that new technologies hold the key to human progress seems to Inclusion moves beyond the limited view of haves and be sacrosanct. Mark Warschauer’s compelling critique of technophilia offers a welcome have-nots to analyze the different forms of access to corrective to this view. He emphasizes that new technologies are neither causes nor information and communication technologies. cures, shifting the emphasis to the social context in which such technologies appear. Drawing on theory from political science, economics, In so doing, he provides renewed energy for a reevaluation of the relation between sociology, psychology, communications, education, technology and social inequality.” and linguistics, the book examines the ways in which Michael Cole, University Professor of Communication, Psychology, and Human differing access to technology contributes to social Development, University of California, San Diego and economic stratification or inclusion. The book takes a global perspective, presenting case studies The MIT Press from developed and developing countries, including Massachusetts Institute of Technology Brazil, China, Egypt, India, and the United States. Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142 Technology A central premise is that, in today’s society, the http://mitpress.mit.edu ability to access, adapt, and create knowledge using information and communication technologies is criti- and Social Inclusion cal to social inclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Teachers' Experiences with Transnational,Telecollaborative
    This book provides a nexus between research and practice through teachers’ narratives of their experiences with telecollaboration. The book begins with Melinda Dooly & a chapter outlining the pedagogical and theoretical underpinnings of telecol- laboration (also known as Virtual Exchange), followed by eight chapters that Robert O’Dowd (eds) explain telecollaborative project design, materials and activities as well as frank discussions of obstacles met and resolved during the project imple- mentation. The projects described in the volume serve as excellent examples for any teacher or education stakeholder interested in setting up their own In This Together: telecollaborative exchange. Teachers’ Experiences with Transnational, Telecollaborative Language Learning Projects In This Together: Teachers’ Experiences with Transnational, Experiences with Transnational, Teachers’ In This Together: elecollaborative Language Learning Projects TELECOLLABORATION IN EDUCATION 6 Melinda Dooly & Robert O’Dowd (eds) PETER LANG www.peterlang.com ISBN 978-3-0343-3501-0 Melinda Ann Dooly Owenby and Robert O'Dowd - 978-3-0343-3534-8 Downloaded from PubFactory at 01/11/2019 02:35:37AM via free access PETER LANG TE_006 433501_Dooly_TL 155x225Br globalL.indd 1 13.06.18 16:30 This book provides a nexus between research and practice through teachers’ narratives of their experiences with telecollaboration. The book begins with Melinda Dooly & a chapter outlining the pedagogical and theoretical underpinnings of telecol- laboration (also known as Virtual Exchange), followed by eight chapters that Robert O’Dowd (eds) explain telecollaborative project design, materials and activities as well as frank discussions of obstacles met and resolved during the project imple- mentation. The projects described in the volume serve as excellent examples for any teacher or education stakeholder interested in setting up their own In This Together: telecollaborative exchange.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary J. Schleppegrell
    Mary J. Schleppegrell February, 2020 School of Education University of Michigan 610 E. University Ave. Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1259 734-647-2449 Education Ph.D., Linguistics, 1989 Georgetown University, Washington, DC M.A., Teaching English as a Foreign Language, 1982 American University in Cairo, Cairo, Egypt Multiple Subjects Teaching Credential, 1978 California State University, Sacramento, CA B.A., summa cum laude, German, 1972 University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN Experience • Professor of Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 2005-present. • Chair, Educational Studies, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 2012-2015. • Professor of Linguistics, University of California, Davis, CA., 2004-2005. • Chair, Linguistics Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, CA. 2002-2005. • Member, Education Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, CA. 1997-2005. • Associate Professor of Linguistics, University of California, Davis, CA. 1998-2004. • Director of English as a Second Language, University of California, Davis, CA. 1992- 2003. • Assistant Professor of Linguistics, University of California, Davis, CA. 1992-1998. • Education Specialist, Peace Corps, Washington, DC, 1989-1992. • Language and Training Specialist, Center for Applied Linguistics, Washington, DC, 1985-1989. • Consultant for Language Training Program Development, Cairo, Egypt and Washington, DC, 1981-85. • Instructor, Freshman Writing Program, American University in Cairo, Cairo, Egypt, 1980-82. • Master Teacher, California State University, Sacramento, teacher education program, 1979-80. • Teacher, Grades K-6, Elk Grove Independent School District, Elk Grove, CA, 1977-80. 1 Schleppegrell Publications Books, articles, and book chapters Krishnan, J., M. J. Schleppegrell, P. Collins, M. Warschauer. (Forthcoming May 2020) Supporting a language-focused approach to close reading in middle school English Language Arts.
    [Show full text]
  • Virtual Exchange and Internationalising the Classroom
    Virtual Exchange and internationalising the classroom Virtual Exchange and internationalising the classroom by Robert O’Dowd by Robert O’Dowd a long history in university language education ‘The first examples of online Robert O’Dowd University of León [email protected] (Warschauer, 1995) and, over the past two Published in Training, Language and Culture Vol 1 Issue 4 (2017) pp. 8-24 doi: 10.29366/2017tlc.1.4.1 collaborative projects between decades, approaches to Virtual Exchange have Recommended citation format: O’Dowd, R. (2017). Virtual Exchange and internationalising the classroom. classrooms around the globe evolved in different contexts and different areas of Training Language and Culture, 1(4), 8-24. doi: 10.29366/2017tlc.1.4.1 university education and these approaches have began to appear within a few Telecollaboration, or ‘Virtual Exchange’ refers to the application of online communication tools to bring together years of the emergence of the classes of learners in geographically distant locations with the aim of developing their foreign language skills, digital had, at times, very diverse pedagogical objectives. competence and intercultural competence through online collaborative tasks and project work. In recent years For example, approaches in foreign language Internet’ approaches to Virtual Exchange have evolved in different contexts and different areas of university education and these approaches have had, at times, very diverse organisational structures and pedagogical objectives. This article provides education have explored the development of an overview of the different models and approaches to Virtual Exchange which are currently being used in higher autonomy in language learners, foreign language appear within a few years of the emergence of the education contexts and outlines how the activity has contributed to internationalising university education to date.
    [Show full text]