DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Community Vulnerability Profile May 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Community Vulnerability Profile May 2020 Regional Community Vulnerability Profile May 2020 1. OVERVIEW During disasters, populations with higher levels of vulnerability are more likely to be impacted. Understanding a community’s demographic and socioeconomic profile can help emergency managers better prepare for and respond to hazard events by identifying areas with higher vulnerabilities and higher rates of access and functional needs. Examples of using this information include identifying areas with marginalized and underserved population groups in the region; identifying areas in need of emergency shelters and resources; understanding the disproportionate impacts a community may be faced with; identifying communities that will need continued support to recover after an emergency or natural disaster; and helping allocate emergency preparedness funding based on community need. This analysis can also deepen the understanding of health and social inequities in the community. It can help address equity implications that may arise during an emergency or disaster to better serve the needs of those most marginalized. This profile provides an overview of the regional community vulnerabilities for the 19 counties and four Tribes that make up the Washington State Regional Emergency Disaster Healthcare Coalition (REDi HCC). It utilizes five-year estimates provided by the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2014-2018 American Community Survey. The profile focuses on at-risk populations and vulnerability indicators. Data is provided for the Eastern Washington region, with county specific data at the end of the document. A list of additional resources is also included. Social Vulnerability Indicators To help identify vulnerable populations and at- risk individuals, the Center for Disease Control developed the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI). The SVI can help emergency managers better prepare for and respond to emergency events and hazards by identifying areas with higher vulnerabilities and higher rates of access and functional needs. The Social Vulnerability Index uses following indicators to track vulnerability from the 2014-2018 American Community Survey (ACS), listed in Figure 1. The SVI provides an overall ranking for each census tract that can be aggregated at the county level to provide a comprehensive assessment. Percentile ranking values range Figure 1. Social Vulnerability Index Indicators 1 from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating greater vulnerability. See Figure 2 for overall vulnerability rankings for Eastern Washington by county. SVI Outputs for Eastern Washington Counties: • Adams County has the highest social vulnerability ranking in the region with a rating of 1, which is reserved for the most vulnerable. When looking at the rankings by social vulnerability theme, Adams County received the highest ranking available in socioeconomic status, minority status and language, and housing and transportation. • Okanogan, Yakima, and Ferry Counties all have ratings over 0.9. • Garfield County has the lowest social vulnerability with an overall ranking of 0.0263. • Spokane County, the most populated county in the region, has a moderate vulnerability ranking at 0.39. • The average vulnerability index rating for Eastern Washington is 0.5872. Figure 2. 2018 Social Vulnerability Index Overall Ranking for Eastern Washington, by County Garfield 0.0263 Lincoln 0.1316 Kittitas 0.2368 Columbia 0.2632 Asotin 0.3684 Stevens 0.3947 Spokane 0.4474 Whitman 0.5 Benton 0.5263 Pend Oreille 0.5526 Walla Walla 0.6842 Douglas 0.7105 Chelan 0.7368 Grant 0.8421 Franklin 0.8947 Ferry 0.9211 Yakima 0.9474 Okanogan 0.9737 Adams 1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 2 2. GEOGRAPHY The Regional Emergency Disaster Healthcare Coalition (REDi HCC) covers the 19 counties and four tribal areas in eastern Washington. With over 1.5 million residents across 40,000 square miles, the REDi HCC counties make up 21% of Washington’s total population and 60% of the land area. The region spans from the Canadian border in the north to the Columbia River in the south, and is bordered by the Cascade mountains to the west and Idaho to the east. Major geographic areas include the Okanogan Highlands, Kettle Range, and Rocky Mountains in the north; Blue Mountains in the southeast where Washington borders Oregon and Idaho; the Columbia Basin lies in the center; and the region also contains the Snake and Columbia Rivers, along with numerous tributaries. Eastern Washington experiences a diverse climate due to its location east of the Cascade Mountain range. The region receives little rainfall due to the rain shadow created by the Cascade Mountains that casts a shadow of dryness east of the mountains. Annual precipitation can range from a low of 7–9 inches in the dry areas near the junction of the Snake and Columbia Rivers in the Columbia Basin, to a high of 75–90 inches of precipitation in the more mountainous areas. Generally, lower elevations are both hotter and drier than higher elevations. Average seasonal temperatures can range from lows of 20s in the winter up to high 90s in the summer. 3. POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS From 2010 to 2018, the population in Eastern Washington grew by 9% from 1.43 million to 1.56 million residents. Spokane County is the most populated in the region with close to 500,000 residents; Garfield is the least populated in the region and the state at just over 2,200 residents. Franklin County had the most population change at 27%, followed by Benton County at 16%. Garfield and Lincoln County both decreased in population by 1%. Spokane County has the highest population per square mile in Eastern Washington at 261.5 people per square mile. Seven counties have lower than 10 people per square mile. On average, the region has an older population than the rest of the state, with 18% of the population 65 years and over. Nine of the 19 counties have a higher percentage of older residents than the rest of the region. The median age for the region is 39.3 years compared to 37.6 years at the state. Adams County has the largest percentage of young residents in the region and the state at 35.2% of the population; Columbia County has the largest percentage of elderly residents at 27.3%. Pend Oreille County has the highest median age in the region at 50.6 years old, while Whitman County has the youngest median age in the region and the state at 24.6 years. Table 1. Population and Age Eastern Washington Washington 2018 Population Estimates 1,562,766 7,294,336 2010 Population Estimates 1,430,502 6,561,297 2010-2018 % Population Change 9% 11% Land Area by Square Mile 39,947.43 66,455.52 Population Per Square Mile 35.8 98.7 % Population under 18 years old 23.6% 22.4% % Population 65 Years and Over 18% 14.7% % Population 85 Years and Over 2% 1.8% Median Age 39.3 37.6 3 4 Race and Ethnicity The population of Eastern Washington is made up of thirty percent people of color1, which is equal to the state total. American Indian and Alaska Native are the largest identified diverse racial group in the region at 3.6 percent, followed by Asian at three percent; close to nine percent of the population identifies as Some Other Race, though data does not specify this further. Ferry County has the largest percentage of American Indian and Alaska Native population in the region and state at 13.5 percent. Eight percent of the population in Whitman County identifies as Asian—with 55 percent of the Asian population identifying as Chinese. Based on ethnicity, 23 percent of the population in Eastern Washington is of Hispanic or Latino origin, an increase of 16 percent since 2010. Of the Hispanic or Latino population in the region, 92 percent identifies as Mexican. Adams County has the highest percentage of Hispanic or Latino residents in the region and the state at 63 percent. Table 2. Race and Ethnicity for People of Color Eastern Washington Washington Race % Black or African American 2.4% 3.7% % American Indian and Alaska Native 3.6% 1.3% % Asian 3% 8.3% % Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 0.6% 0.7% % Some Other Race 8.9% 4.3% % Two or More Races 4.1% 5.7% Ethnicity % Hispanic or Latino - 2018 23% 12.5% % Hispanic or Latino - 2010 20% 11% Hispanic or Latino - 2010-2018 % Change 16% 32% Foreign Born and Language The population of Eastern Washington is eleven Figure 3. World Region of Birth of Foreign percent foreign-born, with seventy percent Born in Eastern Washington originally born in Latin America. Adams County has the highest percentage of foreign born Europe Northern 10% population at 25 percent, with 95 percent America Asia originally born in Latin America. Chelan, Douglas, 4% 13% Franklin, Grant, Okanogan, and Yakima counties also have over 80% of the foreign born population Africa 2% from Latin America. Oceania Of the population 5 years and over in Eastern Latin 1% Washington, 21 percent speaks a language other America than English at home and eight percent speak 70% English less than well. In Adams County, more than half the population speak another language at home, which is nearly three times the state total. 1 People of color is calculated by Total Population – Not Hispanic or Latino, White Alone 5 Close to half speak another language in Franklin County. Of these residents in Adams and Franklin counties, more than a quarter speak English less than well. Table 3. Foreign Born and Language Eastern Washington Washington % Foreign Born Population 11% 14% % 5 Years and over who speak a language other 21.1% 19.4% than English % 5 Years and over who speaks English 8.1% 7.6% “less than well” Income, Poverty, and Education The average median household income for the REDi HCC region is $52,675.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Snowmobiles in the Wilderness
    Snowmobiles in the Wilderness: You can help W a s h i n g t o n S t a t e P a r k s A necessary prohibition Join us in safeguarding winter recreation: Each year, more and more people are riding snowmobiles • When riding in a new area, obtain a map. into designated Wilderness areas, which is a concern for • Familiarize yourself with Wilderness land managers, the public and many snowmobile groups. boundaries, and don’t cross them. This may be happening for a variety of reasons: many • Carry the message to clubs, groups and friends. snowmobilers may not know where the Wilderness boundaries are or may not realize the area is closed. For more information about snowmobiling opportunities or Wilderness areas, please contact: Wilderness…a special place Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission (360) 902-8500 Established by Congress through the Wilderness Washington State Snowmobile Association (800) 784-9772 Act of 1964, “Wilderness” is a special land designation North Cascades National Park (360) 854-7245 within national forests and certain other federal lands. Colville National Forest (509) 684-7000 These areas were designated so that an untouched Gifford Pinchot National Forest (360) 891-5000 area of our wild lands could be maintained in a natural Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest (425) 783-6000 state. Also, they were set aside as places where people Mt. Rainier National Park (877) 270-7155 could get away from the sights and sounds of modern Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest (509) 664-9200 civilization and where elements of our cultural history Olympic National Forest (360) 956-2402 could be preserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Simcoe Mountains Volcanic Field, Main Central Segment, Yakama Nation, Washington by Wes Hildreth and Judy Fierstein
    Prepared in Cooperation with the Water Resources Program of the Yakama Nation Geologic Map of the Simcoe Mountains Volcanic Field, Main Central Segment, Yakama Nation, Washington By Wes Hildreth and Judy Fierstein Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3315 Photograph showing Mount Adams andesitic stratovolcano and Signal Peak mafic shield volcano viewed westward from near Mill Creek Guard Station. Low-relief rocky meadows and modest forested ridges marked by scattered cinder cones and shields are common landforms in Simcoe Mountains volcanic field. Mount Adams (elevation: 12,276 ft; 3,742 m) is centered 50 km west and 2.8 km higher than foreground meadow (elevation: 2,950 ft.; 900 m); its eruptions began ~520 ka, its upper cone was built in late Pleistocene, and several eruptions have taken place in the Holocene. Signal Peak (elevation: 5,100 ft; 1,555 m), 20 km west of camera, is one of largest and highest eruptive centers in Simcoe Mountains volcanic field; short-lived shield, built around 3.7 Ma, is seven times older than Mount Adams. 2015 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Introductory Overview for Non-Geologists ...............................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................2 Physiography, Environment, Boundary Surveys, and Access ......................................................6 Previous Geologic
    [Show full text]
  • Power System
    HISTORY AND CURRENT STATUS OF THE ELECTRICITY INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST Kevin Schneider Ph.D., P.E. Chair, Seattle Chapter of the IEEE PES IEEE PES SCHOLARSHIP PLUS INITIATIVE 2 Washington State PES Scholars • Patrick Berg, Seattle University • Parichehr Karimi, University of • Zachary Burrows, Eastern Washington Washington UiUnivers ity • TiTravis Kinney, WhitWashington Sta te UiUnivers ity • Erin Clement, University of Washington • Allan Koski, Eastern Washington University • Anastasia Corman, University of • Kyle Lindgren, University of Washington, Washington • John Martinsen, Washington State • Gwendolyn Crabtree, Washington State University University • Melissa Martinsen, University of • David Dearing, Washington State Washington University • JthJonathan NhiNyhuis, SttlSeattle PifiPacific UiUnivers ity • Terra Donley, Gonzaga University Derek Jared Pisinger, Washington State Gowrylow, Seattle University University • Sanel Hirkic, Washington State University • Douglas Rapier, Washington State • Nathan Hirsch, Eastern Washington University University • Chris Rusnak, Washington State University • John Hofman, Washington State • Kaiwen Sun, University of Washington University • Joshua Wu, Seattle University • • Tracy Yuan, University of Washington 3 OVERVIEW Part 1: The Current Status of the Electricity Infrastructure in the Pacific North west Part 2: How the Current System Evolved Over Time Part 3: Current Challenges and the Path Forward Part 4: Concluding Comments PART 1:: THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE ELECTRICITY INFRASTRUCTURE
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropological Study of Yakama Tribe
    1 Anthropological Study of Yakama Tribe: Traditional Resource Harvest Sites West of the Crest of the Cascades Mountains in Washington State and below the Cascades of the Columbia River Eugene Hunn Department of Anthropology Box 353100 University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195-3100 [email protected] for State of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife WDFW contract # 38030449 preliminary draft October 11, 2003 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 4 Executive Summary 5 Map 1 5f 1. Goals and scope of this report 6 2. Defining the relevant Indian groups 7 2.1. How Sahaptin names for Indian groups are formed 7 2.2. The Yakama Nation 8 Table 1: Yakama signatory tribes and bands 8 Table 2: Yakama headmen and chiefs 8-9 2.3. Who are the ―Klickitat‖? 10 2.4. Who are the ―Cascade Indians‖? 11 2.5. Who are the ―Cowlitz‖/Taitnapam? 11 2.6. The Plateau/Northwest Coast cultural divide: Treaty lines versus cultural 12 divides 2.6.1. The Handbook of North American Indians: Northwest Coast versus 13 Plateau 2.7. Conclusions 14 3. Historical questions 15 3.1. A brief summary of early Euroamerican influences in the region 15 3.2. How did Sahaptin-speakers end up west of the Cascade crest? 17 Map 2 18f 3.3. James Teit‘s hypothesis 18 3.4. Melville Jacobs‘s counter argument 19 4. The Taitnapam 21 4.1. Taitnapam sources 21 4.2. Taitnapam affiliations 22 4.3. Taitnapam territory 23 4.3.1. Jim Yoke and Lewy Costima on Taitnapam territory 24 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Grain Train
    How does the Washington Grain Train generate revenues? Washington Usage fees for grain cars are generated on the BNSF Railroad based on a combination of mileage traveled and number of days on that railroad (time and mileage). The further the car travels Grain Train and the longer it is on a particular railroad, the more money the car earns. The shuttle service between grain elevators and the barge terminal in Wallula use a different system. A car use fee per trip was June 2011 established for the shuttle service based on estimates of time and mileage. One car use fee was established for shipments on the PV Hooper rail line, and another for the BLMR. These fees are deposited directly into accounts managed by each of the three Grain Train Revolving Fund (Washington State-Owned Cars) port districts. These funds are used for grain car maintenance, car tracking, and Dollars in millions eventual car replacement (based on a 20- $1.4 year depreciation schedule). A portion of $1.2 these fees are also set aside and used as $1.0 a “reserve” fund that is periodically tapped for fleet expansion. $0.8 Once the reserve fund has grown large $0.6 enough to purchase rail cars and there is $0.4 a demonstrated need for additional cars, WSDOT can instruct the port districts to $0.2 send funds to a rail car sales firm selected $0 by WSDOT. This firm then delivers the cars 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 to Washington for rehabilitation and then Twenty nine additional grain hopper rail cars were purchased in 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • CONFEDERATED TRIBES and BANDS Nos
    FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS Nos. 19-35807 OF THE YAKAMA NATION, a 19-35821 sovereign federally recognized Native Nation, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant/ 1:17-cv-03192- Cross-Appellee, TOR v. OPINION KLICKITAT COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington; KLICKITAT COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, an agency of Klickitat County; BOB SONGER, in his official capacity; KLICKITAT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, an agency of Klickitat County; DAVID QUESNEL, in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees/ Cross-Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Thomas O. Rice, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted November 20, 2020 Seattle, Washington 2 YAKAMA NATION V. KLICKITAT CNTY. Filed June 11, 2021 Before: Ronald M. Gould and Michelle T. Friedland, Circuit Judges, and Jill A. Otake,* District Judge. Opinion by Judge Friedland SUMMARY** Tribal Reservation Affirming the district court’s judgment entered following a bench trial, the panel held that under an 1855 treaty between the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation and the United States, the Yakama Reservation includes a tract, known as Tract D, that partially overlaps with Klickitat County, Washington. The parties’ dispute arose when the County attempted to prosecute P.T.S., a minor and enrolled member of the Tribe, for acts that occurred within Tract D. Pursuant to a proclamation issued by the Governor of Washington, the Yakamas and the federal government share exclusive jurisdiction over certain criminal and civil offenses that occur on Reservation lands. The Yakamas sued the County and County officials, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief barring the County from exercising criminal * The Honorable Jill A.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 26 Trails in Grant County 2020
    and 12 Watchable Wildlife Units For more information, please contact: Grant County Tourism Commission P.O. Box 37, Ephrata, WA 98823 509.765.7888 • 800.992.6234 In Grant County, Washington TourGrantCounty.com TOP TRAILS Grant County has some of the most scenic and pristine vistas, hiking trails and outdoor 26 recreational opportunities in Washington State. and 12 Watchable Wildlife Units Grant County is known for its varied landscapes on a high desert plateau with coulees, lakes, in Grant County Washington reservoirs, sand dunes, canals, rivers, creeks, and other waterways. These diverse ecosystems Grant County Tourism Commission For Additional copies please contact: support a remarkable variety of fish and PO Box 37 Jerry T. Gingrich wildlife species that contribute to the economic, Ephrata, Washington 98837 Grant County Tourism Commission recreational and cultural life of the County. www.tourgrantcounty.com Grant County Courthouse PO Box 37 Ephrata, WA 98837 No part of this book may be reproduced in (509) 754-2011, Ext. 2931 any form, or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, without permission in For more information on writing from the Grant County Tourism Grant County accommodations Commission. www.tourgrantcounty.com © 2019, Grant County Tourism Commission Second printing, 10m Trails copy and photographs Book, map and cover design by: provided by: Denise Adam Graphic Design Cameron Smith, Lisa Laughlin, J. Kemble, Veradale, WA 99037 Shawn Cardwell, Mark Amara, (509) 891-0873 Emry Dinman, Harley Price, [email protected] Sebastian Moraga and Madison White Printed by: Rewriting and editing by: Mark Amara Pressworks 2717 N. Perry Street Watchable Wildlife copy and Spokane, Washington 99207 photographs provided by: (509) 462-7627 Washington Department of [email protected] Fish and Wildlife Photograph by Lisa Laughlin CONTENTS CONTENTS Grant County Trails and Hiking Grant County Watchable Wildlife Viewing Upper Grand Coulee Area 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Data Compilation
    APPENDIX A DATA COMPILATION Table of Contents A-1 Bibliography A-2 Non-GIS Data Directory A-3 GIS Data Directory APPENDIX A-1 BIBLIOGRAPHY Spokane Watershed Bibliography Appendix A1 1. Adema, G. W. Bedrock Depth and Morphology of the Rathdrum Prairie, Idaho: University of Idaho; c1999. 67 pages. Notes: Master of Science Thesis 2. Adema, G. W.; K.F.Sprenke., and R.M. Breckenridge. Bed Morphology of the Spokane Valley/Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer from a Detailed Gravity Survey [abstract]. Geological Society of America. 1998; 30(6). 3. Ader, M. J. Hydrogeology of the Green Bluff Plateau Spokane County. Washington State Department of Ecology, Shorelands and Water Resources Program; 1996; Open File Technical Information Report 96-03. 27 pages. 4. Allen, D. R. Latah Creek, Washington, Watershed: 1995-1996 Water Year Water Quality Assessment [abstract]. Inland Northwest Water Resources Conference, Program and Abstracts; 1997. 5. Amerigian, C.; J. Toth, and S.P. Reidel. Paleomagnetism of the Columbia River Basalt Group [abstract]. Geological Society of America Abstracts With Programs. 1987; 19(6):354. 6. Ames, K. C.; N.P. Matson.; D.M. Suzuki., and P.B. Sak. Inventory, Characterization, and Water Quality of Springs, Seeps, and Streams near Midnite Mine, Stevens County, Washington. U.S. Geological Survey; 1996; U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-115. 53 pages. 7. Anderson, A. M.; K. Bloudek.; P.O. Hyde; O. O'Connor, and N. Ogren. Evaluation of Urban Runoff Treatment in Swales. Spokane, Washington: Gonzaga University, School of Engineering, Center for Engineering Design; 1996; Senior Design Project 95-5. 44 pages. 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Excerpt from the Yakima Nation/Cleanup of Hanford
    DOE Indian Policy and Treaty Obligations Excerpt from The Yakama Nation and the Cleanup of Hanford: Contested Meanings of Environmental Remediation written by Daniel A. Bush (2014) http://nativecases.evergreen.edu/collection/cases/the-yakama-nation-and-the-cleanup- of-hanford-contested-meanings-of-environmental-remediation Map: Yakama Reservation and lands ceded by the Yakama in the 1855 treaty (Klickitat Library Images, 2014) According to the DOE’s Tribal Program, “the involvement [of] Native American Tribes at Hanford is guided by DOE's American Indian Policy [which] states that it is the trust responsibility of the United States to protect tribal sovereignty and self-determination, tribal lands, assets, resources, and treaty and other federal recognized and reserved rights” (Department of Energy (DOE) Tribal Program, 2014). Therefore, where Native Americans are concerned it would seem that the DOE has a legal obligation to restore the Hanford site to its pre-nuclear state. It could also be argued that Native tribes have their own trust responsibility for preservation of natural resources on both tribal lands and those areas of traditional use. Moreover, the web of responsibilities associated with the Hanford cleanup are complicated by potential liabilities, as Native peoples have a right to “damages for injuries which occur to natural resources as a result of hazardous waste release” (Bauer, 1994). Thus, Native Americans who traditionally used the affected area have also been involved in the cleanup of Hanford. CERCLA itself named Native tribes as having a vested interest in Superfund sites such as Hanford. The DOE agrees that the Nez Perce Tribe, the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Indian Nation, and Wanapum native peoples be regularly consulted throughout the cleanup process and that all have rights to resources in the 1 Hanford region.
    [Show full text]
  • Timber Resource Statistics for Eastern Washington
    EDITORS FILE COPY Agriculture Timber Resource Forest Setvice Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Statistics for Eastern Experiment Station Resource Bulletin PNW-104 washington September 1983 Patricia M. Bassett and Daniel D. Oswald Authors PATRICIA M. BASSEll is a computer programer analyst and DANIEL D. OSWALD is a resource analyst at the Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, P.O. Box 3890, Portland, Oregon 97208. Abstract Summary Preface Bassett, Patricia M.; Oswald, Daniel D. The eastern Washington resource area Forest Inventory and Analysis (formerly Timber resource statistics for eastern totals 26,966,000 acres (10 913 000 ha), Forest Survey) is a nationwide project of Washington. Resour. Bull. PNW-104. of which an estimated 9,216,000 acres the USDA Forest Service authorized by Portland, OR: U.S. Department of (3 730 000 ha) are forested. An estimated the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific 7,145,000 acres (2 891 000 ha) are Resources Research Act of 1978. Work Northwest Forest and Range Experi- classified as timberland. The area has an units of the project, located at Forest ment Station; 1983.32 p. estimated 17.3 billion cubic feet Service Experiment Stations, conduct (491 million m3) of standing timber with forest resource inventories throughout This report summarizes a 1980 timber 72 percent of this volume in public the 50 States. The Pacific Northwest resource inventory of the 16 forested ownership. Forest and Range Experiment Station at counties in Washington east of the crest Portland, Oregon, is responsible for of the Cascade Range. Detailed tables of inventories in Alaska, California, Hawaii, forest area, timber volume, growth, Oregon, and Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • Prelimprogram.4.25
    “The Living Breath of Wǝɫǝbʔaltxʷ” Indigenous Ways of Knowing Cultural Food Practices and Ecological Knowledge Symposium May 1-2, 2013 University of Washington, Seattle Where: Walker-Ames Room,Seattle, Kane Hall Time: 8:45 AM – 5:00 PM May 1–2, 2013 This event brings together Native leaders, elders, and scholars who will share their knowledge on Northwest Coast tribal food sovereignty and security initiatives, treaties, fishing rights and habitat protection. This symposium is the inaugural event to honor UW’s future longhouse-style community building, Wǝɫǝbʔaltxʷ (a Lushootseed word meaning Intellectual House), that will open in 2014. This event symbolizes the spirit of Wǝɫǝbʔaltxʷ and embodies the essence of the work we envision Sponsored by: American Indian Studies doing in this cultural and intellectual space. For further information contact: [email protected] http://depts.washington.edu/native/ “The Living Breath of Wǝɫǝbʔaltxʷ” Indigenous Ways of Knowing Cultural Food Practices and Ecological Knowledge Symposium Walker Ames Room, Kane Hall 225 (Floor 2) University of Washington, Seattle May 1–2, 2013 Day 1: Wednesday, May 1 8:15am – 8:55am Registration and continental breakfast 8:45am – 9:00am Cultural performance: Tseshaht singers/dancers 9:00am – 9:10am Welcome: Symposium coordinating committee, Charlotte Coté, Dian Million, Elissa Washuta, and Clarita Lefthand-Begay 9:10am – 9:15am Welcome: Judy Howard, Divisional Dean of Social Sciences, UW College of Arts & Sciences 9:15am – 9:20am Opening prayer 9:25am – 9:55am Panel 1: University of Washington’s “Wǝɫǝbʔaltxʷ” Intellectual House • Marilyn Wandry (Suquamish), Wǝɫǝbʔaltxʷ Elder’s Committee • Sheila Edwards Lange, Vice President/Vice Provost Minority Affairs and Diversity • Charlotte Coté (Tseshaht/Nuu-chah-nulth) Ph.D., Associate Professor, UW Department of American Indian Studies, Chair, Wǝɫǝbʔaltxʷ Planning/Advising Committee • Clarita Lefthand Begay (Diné) MS, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Setting the Vision for Gorge Future Public, Governors, Senators, Voice Support for Funding Gorge Protection at Gorge Forum
    FRIENDS OF THE COLUMBIA GORGE Setting the Vision for Gorge Future Public, Governors, Senators, Voice Support for Funding Gorge Protection at Gorge Forum On April21, Congressman Earl Blumenauer sponsored the Columbia River Gorge Forum, hosted by McMenamins Edgefield. A standing­ room-only crowd heard panels discuss issues and opportunities for economic development and recreation in the Gorge. Representatives from the offices of Governor Kitzhaber, Governor Locke, Senator Ron Wyden, and Senator Patty Murray spoke in support of funding Gorge protection through the Columbia Gorge Commission. Repre­ sentative Marc Boldt from Washington, who has led the attack on the Gorge protection budget, spoke briefly. Representatives Val Ogden from Washington and Chris Beck from Oregon spoke in support of full funding for Gorge protection. More than 20 people testified during public comment. The overwhelming majority of people supported Gorge protection, and several people raised "Those who seek to slash funding for concerns that the Act is not strong the Gorge Commission and reduce its enough. Two representatives of effectiveness have severely misjudged Skamania continued on page 5 the mood of the public. The passion This 1994 photo (left) shows urban growth in and commitment to prated and Troutdale, Oregon, outside the western enhance the Gorge was clearly evident boundary of the National Scenic Area, and rural-scale development and farmlands within at the April 21 forum. I intend to build the Scenic Area east of the Sandy River. on that support and enthusiasm in the Cutting Gorge protection in this time of explosive population growth and develop­ months ahead." Congressman Earl Blumenauer ment will put the Gorge at great risk.
    [Show full text]