DOCSLIB.ORG

DEEPFISH Project: Applying an Ecosystem Approach to the Sustainable Management of Deep-Water Fisheries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DEEPFISH Project: Applying an Ecosystem Approach to the Sustainable Management of Deep-Water Fisheries DEEPFISH Project: Applying an ecosystem approach to the sustainable management of deep-water fisheries. Part 1: Development of an Ecopath with Ecosim model SAMS report no. 259a DEEPFISH Project: Applying an ecosystem approach to the sustainable management of deep-water fisheries Project Partners University of Plymouth: Dr Kerry Howell Scottish Association for Marine Science: Dr Sheila JJ Heymans, Dr John Gordon, Janet Duncan, Morag Ayers1 Additional contributions from Fisheries Research Services: Dr Emma Jones2 1 Now at the School of Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of Kwazulu-Natal, 4041 Durban, South Africa. 2 Now at the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, New Zealand 1 A report detailing the project findings is available (DEEPFISH Project: Part 2 report), for a copy please contact Dr Kerry Howell at the University of Plymouth, UK. French and Spanish versions of both reports are also available as pdf documents. The DEEPFISH project is a collaboration between the University of Plymouth and the Scottish Association for Marine Science with data contributions from Fisheries Research Services, Aberdeen (now Marine Scotland). It is funded by the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation and a RCUK Academic Fellowship awarded to Dr Howell. This report should be referenced as: Howell, K.L., Heymans, J.J., Gordon, J.D.M., Duncan, J., Ayers, M., Jones, E.G (2009) DEEPFISH Project: Applying an ecosystem approach to the sustainable management of deep-water fisheries. Part 1: Development of the Ecopath with Ecosim model. Scottish Association for Marine Science, Oban. U.K. Report no. 259a. Image credits: Images indicated as © Crown Copyright, all rights reserved. These photographs were produced as part of the UK Department of Trade and Industry's offshore energy Strategic Environmental Assessment programme. The SEA programme is funded and managed by the DTI and coordinated on their behalf by Geotek Ltd and Hartley Anderson Ltd. Survey of areas of potential reef was funded by Defra and managed on Defra's behalf by JNCC to provide information to support the implementation of the EU Habitats Directive in UK offshore waters. All other images are credited individually. Cover Image © Crown Copyright, all rights reserved; Inset Copyright © JNCC, 2009 2 Contents Summary .................................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 6 2. Model inputs ........................................................................................................... 8 2.1. Trophic groups ................................................................................................. 8 2.2. Fish biomass calculations .............................................................................. 11 2.3. Fisheries ........................................................................................................ 19 2.3.1. Landings.................................................................................................. 19 2.3.2. Discards .................................................................................................. 22 3. Model construction ............................................................................................... 27 3.1. Cetaceans ..................................................................................................... 27 3.2. Shallow sharks ............................................................................................... 28 3.3. Intermediate sharks ....................................................................................... 29 3.4. Deep sharks................................................................................................... 31 3.5. Large demersals ............................................................................................ 31 3.6. Skates and rays ............................................................................................. 32 3.7. Adult roundnose grenadier (>21.5cm) ........................................................... 33 3.8. Juvenile roundnose grenadier (<21.5cm) ...................................................... 35 3.9. Monkfish ........................................................................................................ 36 3.10. Orange roughy ............................................................................................. 37 3.11. Argentine ..................................................................................................... 38 3.12. Blue whiting ................................................................................................. 39 3.13. Black scabbard fish ...................................................................................... 40 3.14. Blue ling ....................................................................................................... 42 3.15. Ling .............................................................................................................. 42 3.16. Greater forkbeard ........................................................................................ 43 3.17. Baird's smooth-head .................................................................................... 44 3.18. Deep water cardinal fish .............................................................................. 44 3.19. Kaup‘s arrowtooth eel .................................................................................. 45 3.20. Megrim and witch ......................................................................................... 46 3.21. Mesopelagics ............................................................................................... 46 3.22. Benthopelagic fish ....................................................................................... 47 3.23. Benthic teleosts ........................................................................................... 50 3.24. Chimaeras ................................................................................................... 51 3.25. Cephalopods................................................................................................ 51 3.26. Prawns and shrimps .................................................................................... 52 3.27. Gelatinous zooplankton ............................................................................... 53 3.28. Large zooplankton ....................................................................................... 53 3.29. Small zooplankton ....................................................................................... 53 3.30. Polychaeta ................................................................................................... 54 3.31. Echinoderms ................................................................................................ 54 3.32. Other benthic inverts .................................................................................... 55 3.33. Phytoplankton .............................................................................................. 55 3.34. Detritus ........................................................................................................ 56 4. Balancing and fitting each group .......................................................................... 57 4.1. Cetaceans ..................................................................................................... 57 4.2. Shallow sharks ............................................................................................... 57 4.3. Intermediate sharks ....................................................................................... 57 4.4. Deep sharks................................................................................................... 58 3 4.5. Large demersals ............................................................................................ 58 4.6. Skates and rays ............................................................................................. 58 4.7. Large Coryphaenoides .................................................................................. 58 4.8. Small Coryphaenoides ................................................................................... 58 4.9. Monkfish ........................................................................................................ 59 4.10. Orange roughy ............................................................................................. 59 4.11. Argentine ..................................................................................................... 59 4.12. Blue whiting ................................................................................................. 59 4.13. Black scabbard fish ...................................................................................... 60 4.14. Blue ling ....................................................................................................... 60 4.15. Ling .............................................................................................................. 61 4.16. Greater forkbeard ........................................................................................ 61 4.17. Baird‘s smoothhead ..................................................................................... 61 4.18. Black cardinal fish .......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Absence of Sharks from Abyssal Regions of the World's Oceans
    Proc. R. Soc. B (2006) 273, 1435–1441 doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3461 Published online 21 February 2006 The absence of sharks from abyssal regions of the world’s oceans Imants G. Priede1,*, Rainer Froese2, David M. Bailey3, Odd Aksel Bergstad4, Martin A. Collins5, Jan Erik Dyb6, Camila Henriques1, Emma G. Jones7 and Nicola King1 1University of Aberdeen, Oceanlab, Newburgh, Aberdeen AB41 6AA, UK 2Leibniz-Institut fu¨r Meereswissenschaften, IfM-GEOMAR, Du¨sternbrooker Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany 3Marine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UCSD 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0202, USA 4Institute of Marine Research, Flødevigen Marine Research Station, 4817 His, Norway 5British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK 6Møre Research, Section of Fisheries, PO Box 5075, 6021 Aalesund, Norway 7FRS Marine Laboratory, 375 Victoria Road, Aberdeen AB11 9DB, UK The oceanic abyss (depths greater than 3000 m), one of the largest environments on the planet, is characterized by absence of solar light, high pressures and remoteness from surface food supply necessitating special molecular, physiological, behavioural and ecological adaptations of organisms that live there. Sampling by trawl, baited hooks and cameras we show that the Chondrichthyes (sharks, rays and chimaeras) are absent from, or very rare in this region. Analysis of a global data set shows a trend of rapid disappearance of chondrichthyan species with depth when compared with bony fishes. Sharks, apparently well adapted to life at high pressures are conspicuous on slopes down to 2000 m including scavenging at food falls such as dead whales.
    [Show full text]
  • DEEPFISHMAN Document 5 : Review of Parasites, Pathogens
    DEEPFISHMAN Management And Monitoring Of Deep-sea Fisheries And Stocks Project number: 227390 Small or medium scale focused research action Topic: FP7-KBBE-2008-1-4-02 (Deepsea fisheries management) DEEPFISHMAN Document 5 Title: Review of parasites, pathogens and contaminants of deep sea fish with a focus on their role in population health and structure Due date: none Actual submission date: 10 June 2010 Start date of the project: April 1st, 2009 Duration : 36 months Organization Name of lead coordinator: Ifremer Dissemination Level: PU (Public) Date: 10 June 2010 Review of parasites, pathogens and contaminants of deep sea fish with a focus on their role in population health and structure. Matt Longshaw & Stephen Feist Cefas Weymouth Laboratory Barrack Road, The Nothe, Weymouth, Dorset DT4 8UB 1. Introduction This review provides a summary of the parasites, pathogens and contaminant related impacts on deep sea fish normally found at depths greater than about 200m There is a clear focus on worldwide commercial species but has an emphasis on records and reports from the north east Atlantic. In particular, the focus of species following discussion were as follows: deep-water squalid sharks (e.g. Centrophorus squamosus and Centroscymnus coelolepis), black scabbardfish (Aphanopus carbo) (except in ICES area IX – fielded by Portuguese), roundnose grenadier (Coryphaenoides rupestris), orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus), blue ling (Molva dypterygia), torsk (Brosme brosme), greater silver smelt (Argentina silus), Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides), deep-sea redfish (Sebastes mentella), alfonsino (Beryx spp.), red blackspot seabream (Pagellus bogaraveo). However, it should be noted that in some cases no disease or contaminant data exists for these species.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of Bear Seamount, New England Seamount Chain: Results of Exploratory Trawling
    W&M ScholarWorks VIMS Articles Virginia Institute of Marine Science 9-2003 Biodiversity of Bear Seamount, New England Seamount chain: Results of exploratory trawling JA Moore M Vecchione R Gibbons JK Galbraith M Turnipseed Virginia Institute of Marine Science See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Moore, JA; Vecchione, M; Gibbons, R; Galbraith, JK; Turnipseed, M; Southworth, M; and Watkins, E, Biodiversity of Bear Seamount, New England Seamount chain: Results of exploratory trawling (2003). Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science, 31, 363-372. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles/1970 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Virginia Institute of Marine Science at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in VIMS Articles by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors JA Moore, M Vecchione, R Gibbons, JK Galbraith, M Turnipseed, M Southworth, and E Watkins This article is available at W&M ScholarWorks: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles/1970 J Northw Atl Fish Sci, Vol 31: 363372 Biodiversity of Bear Seamount, New England Seamount Chain: Results of Exploratory Trawling J A Moore Florida Atlantic University, Honors College, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA M Vecchione, B B Collette and R Gibbons National Marine Fisheries Service, National Systematics Laboratory,
    [Show full text]
  • Small-Scale Patterns of Deep-Sea Fish Distributions and Assemblages Of
    Deep-Sea Research I 65 (2012) 171–188 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Deep-Sea Research I journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/dsri Small-scale patterns of deep-sea fish distributions and assemblages of the Grand Banks, Newfoundland continental slope Krista D. Baker a,n, Richard L. Haedrich a, Paul V.R. Snelgrove b, Vonda E. Wareham c, Evan N. Edinger d, Kent D. Gilkinson c a Biology Department, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL, Canada A1B 3X9 b Ocean Sciences Centre and Biology Department, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL, Canada A1C 5S7 c Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre, St. John’s, NL, Canada A1C 5X1 d Geography Department and Biology Department, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL, Canada A1B 3X9 article info abstract Article history: Deep-sea fishes are the target of directed fisheries and are considered a conservation concern. Yet, we Received 20 September 2011 still know little about the factors that affect deep-sea fish distributions and assemblage patterns on Received in revised form relatively small spatial scales. We used results from remotely operated vehicle surveys that observed 19 March 2012 105 km (346 960 m2) of seafloor over a depth range of 351–2245 m in three canyons off Newfound- Accepted 28 March 2012 land to examine the occurrence, behavior, habitat specificity, and regional assemblage patterns of deep- Available online 5 April 2012 sea fishes in this region. We found distinct assemblages based on both depth and habitat classifications. Keywords: The most obvious unique assemblage was that associated with outcrops, which served as habitat for Fish assemblage patterns relatively rare species such as Neocyttus helgae, Hoplostethus atlanticus, and Lepidion eques.
    [Show full text]
  • Seafood Watch Seafood Report
    Seafood Watch Seafood Report Grenadier Giant grenadier (Albatrossia pectoralis) Pacific grenadier (Coryphaenoides acrolepis) Shoulderspot grenadier (Coelorinchus scaphopsis) Popeye grenadier (Coryphaenoides cinereus) Smooth grenadier (Nezumia liolepis) California grenadier (Nezumia stelgidolepis) (Pacific Grenadier, courtesy of ODFW) West Coast Region Final Report November 23, 2005 Updated March 17, 2006 Kelsey Abbott Independent Contractor MBA_SeafoodWatch_GrenadierReport_FinalReport.doc March 17, 2006 About Seafood Watch® and the Seafood Reports Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch® program evaluates the ecological sustainability of wild-caught and farmed seafood commonly found in the United States marketplace. Seafood Watch® defines sustainable seafood as originating from sources, whether wild-caught or farmed, which can maintain or increase production in the long-term without jeopardizing the structure or function of affected ecosystems. Seafood Watch® makes its science-based recommendations available to the public in the form of regional pocket guides that can be downloaded from the Internet (seafoodwatch.org) or obtained from the Seafood Watch® program by emailing [email protected]. The program’s goals are to raise awareness of important ocean conservation issues and empower seafood consumers and businesses to make choices for healthy oceans. Each sustainability recommendation on the regional pocket guides is supported by a Seafood Report. Each report synthesizes and analyzes the most current ecological, fisheries and ecosystem science on a species, then evaluates this information against the program’s conservation ethic to arrive at a recommendation of “Best Choices,” “Good Alternatives,” or “Avoid.” The detailed evaluation methodology is available upon request. In producing the Seafood Reports, Seafood Watch® seeks out research published in academic, peer-reviewed journals whenever possible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Abundance, Distribution, and Bionomics of the Family Macrouridae in the Norfolk Canyon Area
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1979 The abundance, distribution, and bionomics of the family Macrouridae in the Norfolk Canyon area Robert W. Middleton College of William and Mary - Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Marine Biology Commons, and the Oceanography Commons Recommended Citation Middleton, Robert W., "The abundance, distribution, and bionomics of the family Macrouridae in the Norfolk Canyon area" (1979). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539617486. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.25773/v5-89x4-hq74 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ABUNDANCE, DISTRIBUTION, AND BIONOMICS OF THE FAMILY MACROURIDAE IN THE NORFOLK CANYON AREA A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the School of Marine Science The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Robert W. Middleton 1979 ProQuest Number: 10626236 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10626236 Published by ProQuest LLC (2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Availability of Deep-Water Fish to Trawling and Visual Observation from a Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV)
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 284: 293–303, 2004 Published December 21 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Availability of deep-water fish to trawling and visual observation from a remotely operated vehicle (ROV) Verena M. Trenkel1,*, R. I. C. Chris Francis2, Pascal Lorance3, Stéphanie Mahévas1, Marie-Joëlle Rochet1, Dianne M. Tracey2 1Laboratoire MAERHA, IFREMER, Rue de l’Ile d’Yeu, BP 21105, 44311 Nantes Cedex 03, France 2National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd, Private Bag 14901, Wellington, New Zealand 3Laboratoire Ressources Halieutiques, IFREMER, BP 70, 29280 Plouzané, France ABSTRACT: Visual observations were collected using video from a remotely operated vehicle (ROV) for a number of deep-water species on the continental slope of the Bay of Biscay, Northeast Atlantic. Relative trawl availability was defined as the ratio of population density estimates from a scientific bottom-trawl survey to those derived from visual strip transects. Several natural and reaction behav- iour variables were explored to explain between-species variation in relative trawl availability. The variable with most explanatory power was spatial dispersion, with aggregating species showing lower relative availability than those that were randomly or uniformly distributed. This variable was also strongly correlated with ROV density estimates (aggregated species had the highest densities). Mean distance off the ground and mean body length of a species were positively related to relative trawl availability. In contrast, the way different species reacted to the ROV did not appear to be correlated with relative trawl availability. KEY WORDS: Remotely operated vehicle · ROV · Catchability · Spatial distribution · Continental slope Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher INTRODUCTION the particular fishing gear.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep-Sea Shark Species for Consideration of a Cites Listing
    AC25 Inf. 7 (English only / únicamente en inglés / seulement en anglais) CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ___________________ Twenty-fifth meeting of the Animals Committee Geneva, (Switzerland), 18-22 July 2011 DEEP-SEA SHARK SPECIES FOR CONSIDERATION OF A CITES LISTING The attached information document has been submitted by the CITES Secretariat at the request of the Pew Environment Group*. * The geographical designations employed in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the CITES Secretariat or the United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The responsibility for the contents of the document rests exclusively with its author. AC25 Inf. 7 - p. 1 Deep-sea Shark Species for Consideration of a CITES Listing Table of Contents Summary Primary Threats and Trade Summary Vulnerability Assessments Annex I: Species Biology and Background Annex II: CITES Shark Species of Concern Annex III: OSPAR List of Threatened and/or Declining Species and Current ICES Advice Annex IV: IUCN Red List Assessments (full text) Annex V: CITES Conf. 12.6 (Rev. CoP15) Key References Summary: Deep-sea shark species are extremely vulnerable to overexploitation, deep-sea fisheries are largely unregulated, and several deep-sea shark species are found in international trade. Therefore they are in urgent need for protection under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Fauna and Flora (CITES). While much is unknown about the life history of deep-sea sharks, what scientists do know accentuate the need for a precautionary approach to management.
    [Show full text]
  • Feeding of Roundnose Grenadier (Coryphaenoides Rupestris) and Its Trophic Relationships in the North Atlantic*
    NAFO Sci Coun. Studies, 7: 53-59 Feeding of Roundnose Grenadier (Coryphaenoides rupestris) and its Trophic Relationships in the North Atlantic* A. V. Gushchin Atlantic Research Institute of Marine Fisheries and Oceanography (AtlantNIRO) 5 Dmitry Donskoy Street, Kaliningrad, USSR and S. G. Podrilzhanskaya All-Union Research Institute of Marine Fisheries and Oceanography (VNIRO) 17 V. Krasnoselskaya Street, Moscow, USSR Abstract The food spectra of roundnose grenadier from the continental slope areas of eastern Canada. West Greenland. Iceland and Hatton Bank and from the thalassobathyal zones of Reykjanes Ridge and the northern part of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge are compared and changes in feeding by region and fish size are demonstrated. Roundnose grenadier from the continental slope areas of the North Atlantic are shown to be consumers mainly of the second order. their food consisting typically of crustaceans (amphipods, euphausiids, mysids, small decapods and copepods). with fish and cephalopods being generally of much less importance. In the thalassobathyal areas of the North Atlantic. roundnose grenadier are consumers of the third or fourth order. their food consisting mainly of various fish species (myctophids. bathylagids. serrivomerids. chauliodontids and searsiids) and large crustaceans (decap­ ods). The differences are discussed in relation to the environmental conditions and the trophic structures of the communities in the different regions. Introduction eggs and larvae drift in the Irminger Current to West Greenland, from which the young are dispersed by the Roundnose grenadier are found on the slopes of Baffin Land and Labrador Currents to settle off Labra­ the continental shelves throughout the North Atlantic dor and northeastern Newfoundland, and that the mat­ from about 37° N off the United States coast northward uring fish return to the Icelandic area for spawning to Baffin Island, off West Greenland and Iceland, and in (Podrazhanskaya, 1971).
    [Show full text]
  • Orange Roughy and Other Deepwater Benthic Fishes - M
    FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE – Vol. II - Orange Roughy and Other Deepwater Benthic Fishes - M. R. Clark, J. C. Quero ORANGE ROUGHY AND OTHER DEEPWATER BENTHIC FISHES M. R. Clark National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, P O Box 14-901, Wellington, New Zealand J. C. Quero IFREMER-La Rochelle, BP 7 - 17137 L’Houmeau, France Keywords: Orange Roughy, Round Nose Grenadier, Black Scabbard Fish, Alfonsinos, Oreos, Black Cardinal Fish, Tooth Fish Contents 1. Foreword 2. The Deepwater Environment 3. Orange Roughy, Hoplostethus atlanticus, Collett, 1889 4. Round Nose Grenadier, Coryphaenoides rupestris, Gunnerus, 1765 5. Black Scabbard Fish, Aphanopus carbo, Lowe, 1839 6. Alfonsinos, Beryx spp 7. Oreos, Allocyttus niger, James, Inada and Nakamura 1988; Pseudocyttus maculatus Gilchrist 1906 8. Black Cardinal Fish, Epigonus telescopus, Risso, 1810 9. Tooth Fish, Dissostichus eleginoides, Smitt, 1898; D. mawsoni, Norman, 1937 Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketches Summary Information on conditions under which deeper water fishes live is presented. Summary accounts of the taxonomic characteristics, distribution, biology, and fisheries for some of the world’s major commercial deepwater species are given. The fishes covered are orange roughy, the grenadiers, scabbard fish, alfonsinos, oreosomatid fishes, and cardinal UNESCOfish. – EOLSS 1. Foreword SAMPLE CHAPTERS The fishes covered in this section are deepwater fishes, inhabiting the continental slope at depths between about 500 m and 1500 m. For many countries with industrial fisheries, over fishing of the commercial fish species from the shelf has lead to the development of fishing in the deep water below 500 m. On these grounds some fishes live which are largely unknown on the traditional fish markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Wkcofibyc 2021
    WORKSHOP ON FISH OF CONSERVATION AND BYCATCH RELEVANCE (WKCOFIBYC; outputs from 2020 meeting) VOLUME 3 | ISSUE 57 ICES SCIENTIFIC REPORTS RAPPORTS SCIENTIFIQUES DU CIEM ICES INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR THE EXPLORATION OF THE SEA CIEM CONSEIL INTERNATIONAL POUR L’EXPLORATION DE LA MER International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H.C. Andersens Boulevard 44-46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] ISSN number: 2618-1371 This document has been produced under the auspices of an ICES Expert Group or Committee. The contents therein do not necessarily represent the view of the Council. © 2021 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). For citation of datasets or conditions for use of data to be included in other databases, please refer to ICES data policy. ICES Scientific Reports Volume 3 | Issue 57 WORKSHOP ON FISH OF CONSERVATION AND BYCATCH RELEVANCE (WKCOFIBYC) Recommended format for purpose of citation: ICES. 2021. Workshop on Fish of Conservation and Bycatch Relevance (WKCOFIBYC). ICES Scientific Reports. 3:57. 125 pp. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.8194 Editors Maurice Clarke Authors Sara Bonanomi • Archontia Chatzispyrou • Maurice Clarke • Bram Couperus • Jim Ellis • Ruth Fernández • Ailbhe Kavanagh • Allen Kingston • Vasiliki Kousteni • Evgenia Lefkaditou • Henn Ojaveer Wolfgang Nikolaus Probst •
    [Show full text]
  • Stock Annex Roundnos Grenadier in Vbvi
    ICES Stock Annex | 1 Stock Annex: Roundnose grenadier (Coryphaenoides rupestris) in subareas 6-7, and in Divisions 5.b and 12.b (Celtic Seas and the English Channel, Faroes grounds, and western Hatton Bank) Stock specific documentation of standard assessment procedures used by ICES. Stock: Roundnose grenadier Working Group: Working Group on Biology and Assessment of Deep-sea Fisheries Resources (WGDEEP) Created: 9 April 2014 Authors: Lionel Pawlowski, and Pascal Lorance Last updated: 07 May 2019 Last updated by: Bruno Almón A. General A.1. Stock definition ICES WGDEEP has in the past proposed four assessment units of roundnose grena- dier in the NE Atlantic (Figure 1): Skagerrak (3.a)The Faroe–Hatton area; Celtic sea (Divisions 5.b and 12.b, Subareas 6, 7); Mid-Atlantic Ridge ‘MAR’ (Divisions 10.b, 12.c, Subdivisions 5.a1, 12.a1, 14.b1); All other areas (Subareas 1, 2, 4, 8, 9, Division 14.a, Subdivisions 5.a2, 14.b2). Roundnose grenadier is widely distributed in the North Atlantic. Its area stretches from Norway to northwest Africa in the east to the Canadian-Greenland coasts and the Gulf of Mexico in the west, and from Iceland in the north to the areas south of the Azores in the south (Parr, 1946; Andriyashev, 1954; Leim and Scott, 1966; Zilanov et al., 1970; Geistdoerfer, 1977; Gordon, 1978; Parin et al., 1985; Pshenichny et al., 1986; Sauskan, 1988; Eliassen, 1983). Aggregations of this species are found on the conti- nental slope of Europe and Canada, on the MAR seamounts, in the Faroe-Hatton area (banks Hatton, Rockall, Louzy, Bill Baileys, etc.) and in the Skagerrak and Norwegian fjords.
    [Show full text]