Between Holy Russia and a Monkey: Darwin's Russian Literary and Philosophical Critics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Between Holy Russia and a Monkey: Darwin's Russian Literary and Philosophical Critics University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations Summer 2019 Between Holy Russia and a Monkey: Darwin's Russian Literary and Philosophical Critics Brendan G. Mooney Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the Comparative Literature Commons Recommended Citation Mooney, B. G.(2019). Between Holy Russia and a Monkey: Darwin's Russian Literary and Philosophical Critics. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/5484 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BETWEEN HOLY RUSSIA AND A MONKEY: DARWIN’S RUSSIAN LITERARY AND PHILOSOPHICAL CRITICS by Brendan G. Mooney Bachelor of Arts University of South Carolina, 2012 Master of Arts University of South Carolina, 2015 Master of Arts Middlebury College, 2018 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Comparative Literature College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2019 Accepted by: Judith Kalb, Major Professor Alexander Ogden, Committee Member James Barilla, Committee Member Jeffrey Dudycha, Committee Member Cheryl L. Addy, Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School © Copyright by Brendan G. Mooney, 2019 All Rights Reserved. ii DEDICATION To the women who made this dissertation possible: Judith Kalb, Alice Geary, Lynne Geary, Alice Clemente, Megan Stark, Katherine Mark, Marilyn Dwyer, and, finally, Shannon, Eleanor, and Caroline Mooney. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project began, little did I know, after reading Lev Tolstoy’s 1889 novella The Kreutzer Sonata. Tolstoy, whom I had admired for the empathy he showed his characters in Anna Karenina, championed ideas in his novella that seemed to me so wrong-headed and unlike the Tolstoy who had made a character so pitiable as Anna. As I searched for the cause of Tolstoy’s anti-Darwinism, I came to realize just how relevant evolutionary biology in general and Darwinism in particular could be to our sense of meaning and morality. As my study grew to include the journalist Nikolai Strakhov and the philosopher Vladimir Solovyov and, ultimately, into the dissertation before you, I accumulated a series of debts to people, without whom this dissertation would not have been possible. First and foremost, I would like to thank my dissertation committee: Drs. James Barilla, Jeffrey Dudycha, Alexander Ogden, and Judith Kalb. In particular, I would like to thank Dr. Kalb for her quick and invaluable feedback and guidance every step of the way. She also came up with the idea of modifying a line from the author Aleksei Remizov’s “Besties” (“Krestovye sestry”) (1910) to use as the title for my dissertation. I would also like to thank Dr. Dudycha for the many conversations we had about evolutionary biology over lunch. I would like to thank Andrew Drozd for reading a draft of my chapter on Strakhov and for the feedback he, Stephen Woodburn, Yvonne Howell, and Melissa Miller gave me on the condensed versions of the chapter that I presented at ASEEES and SCSS. I would like to thank Daria Smirnova for the trips she made to the Russian iv National Library for me and for the endless scans she made to furnish material for the section “A Note on the Language of Evolutionary Biology” in my introductory chapter. I would also like to thank Dr. Ogden and Andrew Drozd for their feedback on a draft of that same section, which I presented at SCSS. Finally, I want to thank Yuri, Caroline, and Shannon Mooney for their unconditional love and patience. v ABSTRACT This dissertation is dedicated to the response of nineteenth-century Russian writers to the English naturalist Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection. His theory was by no means the next discovery in a series of indistinguishable scientific discoveries; the fact that its implications touched every aspect of human social life was lost on no one, despite the fact that Darwin did not discuss human evolution in any detail. The Origin changed what it meant to be human: what Darwin’s readers took to be their place in the universe and how they ought to act with regard to both other humans and other animals. But when the Origin came to Russia, the moral and cosmological significance of Darwin’s work was grafted onto Russia’s combined historical, social, economic, political, and religious conditions. With their cultural status as near-prophetic, moral authorities, Russian writers became the vehicle through which Russians during this turbulent time accepted, rejected, dissected, rewrote, and grappled with Darwin’s ideas and their ramifications. This dissertation focuses on the understudied responses of three writers in particular: the journalist Nikolai Strakhov, the novelist Lev Tolstoy, and the philosopher Vladimir Solovyov. As I show, despite each writer’s varying background and response to Darwin’s theory, they all shared similar moral concerns. Initially supportive, Strakhov changed his mind, once he realized that Darwin’s theory did not support his own anthropocentric philosophy of organicism. Tolstoy also initially supported Darwin’s theory, but following his conversion to an idiosyncratic Christianity, he became convinced that Darwin’s theory was being used to justify immorality and was incapable vi of serving as the foundation of an ethical system. Solovyov, on the other hand, was a lifelong supporter of Darwin’s theory, though in order to accommodate his own anthropocentrism, he had to downplay its utilitarian and relativistic nature. Ultimately, Tolstoy and Strakhov share a concern about the implications of concept of the struggle for existence for morality, whereas Tolstoy and Solovyov worried that the implications of morality as an adaptation would undermine the foundation of morality. A concern all three writers nevertheless shared was the use of evolutionary theory to justify moral and social behaviors – what was then called “evolutionary ethics,” or “Social Darwinism.” This study contributes the study of how the response to Darwinism varied by country and the moral concerns that underpin responses to scientific ideas more generally. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS Dedication .......................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ iv Abstract .............................................................................................................................. vi Chapter One: Introduction…………………………………………………………...........1 Chapter Two Nikolai Strakhov: Organicism and Anti-Darwinism ...................................33 Chapter Three Lev Tolstoy: Christian Ethics and Anti-Darwinism ..................................94 Chapter Four Vladimir Solovyov: Darwinian Idealism, Darwinian Theism …………..136 Chapter Five Conclusion ..................................................................................................168 Works Cited .....................................................................................................................174 viii CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION The barrel of the pistol pointing straight at his face, the expression of hatred and contempt in the pose and the whole figure of von Koren, and this murder that a decent man was about to commit in broad daylight in the presence of decent people, and this silence, and the unknown force that made Laevsky stand there and not run away – how mysterious, and incomprehensible, and frightening it all was! The time von Koren took to aim seemed longer than a night to Laevsky. He glanced imploringly at the seconds; they did not move and were pale. (Chekhov 228) Thus the Russian writer and physician Anton Chekhov’s novella “The Duel” (1891) reaches its climax, as the zoologist Nikolai von Koren takes aim at the former philology student Ivan Laevsky, in an attempt to put his program of evolutionary ethics into action.1 Such programs are based on theories of human social development and maintenance that rely in some way on facts about the evolutionary process. Having come to the conclusion that Laevsky is, among other things, a congenital philanderer and liar and therefore incapable of reform, von Koren believes that he has no choice but to carry out his moral duty to protect humankind and neutralize the danger he believes Laevsky represents to it by ensuring that he will not procreate (Chekhov 142). Failing to find a non-lethal alternative, von Koren challenges Laevsky to a duel. 1 I use the term “evolutionary ethics” in place of the standard “Social Darwinism” for a few reasons. First, 1 On the day of the duel, Laevsky shoots first and makes a show of firing into the air. Then, just as von Koren is about to pull the trigger, he is distracted by a bystander’s outburst and misses (Chekhov 212; 229); unbeknownst to von Koren, the bullet grazes Laevsky’s neck (Chekhov 231), and thus brings to an end the moral transformation that had begun in Laevsky the night before as he contemplated the prospect of dying. Later, on seeing Laevsky’s transformation, von Koren realizes that he had misjudged Laevsky, who proved to be capable of changing his ways. This realization does not, however, cause von Koren to reevaluate his convictions about evolutionary ethics. In fact, von Koren confesses to Laevsky
Recommended publications
  • The Rediscovery of Byzantine Orthodox Mysti- Cism: an Introduction to the Medieval Hesychasts’ Theory of Humanity’S Deification Nicolas Laos
    Fall 2019 The Rediscovery of Byzantine Orthodox Mysti- cism: An Introduction to the Medieval Hesychasts’ Theory of Humanity’s Deification Nicolas Laos Abstract “canonical”) theology. The term “nepsis” comes from the New Testament (1 Peter 5:8), n the present essay, I investigate and eluci- and it means to be vigilant and of sober mind. I date the principles of the Byzantine Ortho- Nepsis is a state of watchfulness and sobriety dox mystics’ theory of humanity’s deification acquired after a period of inner cleansing. The in a way that helps one to understand the dif- term “hesychasm” (Greek: ἡσυχασμός) comes ference between a propositional and a mystical from the New Testament (Matthew 6:6), and it approach to Christianity, as well as to contem- is a process of retiring inward by quieting plate the significant yet elusive relationship (cleansing) the body and the mind in order, between “Orthodoxy” and “Gnosticism.” The ultimately, to achieve an experiential Byzantine tradition of “hesychasm” is the fo- knowledge of God. The emphasis that the hes- cus of this essay. In particular, I use the term ychasts, or Neptic Fathers, place on inner “Orthodoxy” in order to refer to a canonical cleansing as a precondition of true theology theological system, namely, a theological sys- and for seeing God is a clear Platonic influ- tem approved by a theologically legitimate ence,3 and it resonates with Gnostic epistemol- Church Council. I interpret hesychasm not ogy and Gnostic mystical quests for illumina- merely as a medieval monastic practice but as
    [Show full text]
  • Dead Heroes and Living Saints: Orthodoxy
    Dead Heroes and Living Saints: Orthodoxy, Nationalism, and Militarism in Contemporary Russia and Cyprus By Victoria Fomina Submitted to Central European University Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Supervisors: Professor Vlad Naumescu Professor Dorit Geva CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2019 Budapest, Hungary Statement I hereby declare that this dissertation contains no materials accepted for any other degrees in any other institutions and no materials previously written and / or published by any other person, except where appropriate acknowledgement is made in the form of bibliographical reference. Victoria Fomina Budapest, August 16, 2019 CEU eTD Collection i Abstract This dissertation explores commemorative practices in contemporary Russia and Cyprus focusing on the role heroic and martyrical images play in the recent surge of nationalist movements in Orthodox countries. It follows two cases of collective mobilization around martyr figures – the cult of the Russian soldier Evgenii Rodionov beheaded in Chechen captivity in 1996, and two Greek Cypriot protesters, Anastasios Isaak and Solomos Solomou, killed as a result of clashes between Greek and Turkish Cypriot protesters during a 1996 anti- occupation rally. Two decades after the tragic incidents, memorial events organized for Rodionov and Isaak and Solomou continue to attract thousands of people and only seem to grow in scale, turning their cults into a platform for the production and dissemination of competing visions of morality and social order. This dissertation shows how martyr figures are mobilized in Russia and Cyprus to articulate a conservative moral project built around nationalism, militarized patriotism, and Orthodox spirituality.
    [Show full text]
  • The-Future-Of-Immortality-Remaking-Life
    The Future of Immortality Princeton Studies in Culture and Technology Tom Boellstorff and Bill Maurer, Series Editors This series presents innovative work that extends classic ethnographic methods and questions into areas of pressing interest in technology and economics. It explores the varied ways new technologies combine with older technologies and cultural understandings to shape novel forms of subjectivity, embodiment, knowledge, place, and community. By doing so, the series demonstrates the relevance of anthropological inquiry to emerging forms of digital culture in the broadest sense. Sounding the Limits of Life: Essays in the Anthropology of Biology and Beyond by Stefan Helmreich with contributions from Sophia Roosth and Michele Friedner Digital Keywords: A Vocabulary of Information Society and Culture edited by Benjamin Peters Democracy’s Infrastructure: Techno- Politics and Protest after Apartheid by Antina von Schnitzler Everyday Sectarianism in Urban Lebanon: Infrastructures, Public Services, and Power by Joanne Randa Nucho Disruptive Fixation: School Reform and the Pitfalls of Techno- Idealism by Christo Sims Biomedical Odysseys: Fetal Cell Experiments from Cyberspace to China by Priscilla Song Watch Me Play: Twitch and the Rise of Game Live Streaming by T. L. Taylor Chasing Innovation: Making Entrepreneurial Citizens in Modern India by Lilly Irani The Future of Immortality: Remaking Life and Death in Contemporary Russia by Anya Bernstein The Future of Immortality Remaking Life and Death in Contemporary Russia Anya Bernstein
    [Show full text]
  • From Logos to Bios: Hellenic Philosophy and Evolutionary Biology
    From Logos to Bios: Hellenic Philosophy and Evolutionary Biology by Wynand Albertus de Beer submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of D Litt et Phil in the subject Religious Studies at the University of South Africa Supervisor: Prof Danie Goosen February 2015 Dedicated with grateful acknowledgements to my supervisor, Professor Danie Goosen, for his wise and patient guidance and encouragement throughout my doctoral research, and to the examiners of my thesis for their helpful comments and suggestions. From Logos to Bios: Hellenic Philosophy and Evolutionary Biology by W.A. de Beer Degree: D Litt et Phil Subject: Religious Studies Supervisor: Prof Danie Goosen Summary: This thesis deals with the relation of Hellenic philosophy to evolutionary biology. The first part entails an explication of Hellenic cosmology and metaphysics in its traditional understanding, as the Western component of classical Indo-European philosophy. It includes an overview of the relevant contributions by the Presocratics, Plato, Aristotle, and the Neoplatonists, focussing on the structure and origin of both the intelligible and sensible worlds. Salient aspects thereof are the movement from the transcendent Principle into the realm of Manifestation by means of the interaction between Essence and Substance; the role of the Logos, being the equivalent of Plato’s Demiurge and Aristotle’s Prime Mover, in the cosmogonic process; the interaction between Intellect and Necessity in the formation of the cosmos; the various kinds of causality contributing to the establishment of physical reality; and the priority of being over becoming, which in the case of living organisms entails the primacy of soul over body.
    [Show full text]
  • Saint Herman Press Catalog
    Saint Herman Press Catalog Spiritual Counsels, Lives of Saints, and Theology in the Orthodox Christian Tradition Contents St. Herman Press ............................................................3 St. Herman Press New Releases ..................................................................4 The Writings of Fr. Seraphim Rose ...................8 or almost fifty years, the St. Herman of Alaska Brotherhood has Orthodox Theology .................................................14 Fbeen publishing Orthodox Christian literature. In 1965, with the In the Steps of St. Herman .................................... 16 blessing of St. John of Shanghai and San Francisco, the brotherhood Lives of Saints and Righteous Ones .............. 19 began its mission to bring the truths of Orthodoxy Christianity to the Optina Elder Series ................................................. 24 English-speaking world. Its beginnings were simple: only a storefront and The Sunrise of the East ..........................................26 a small, hand-operated printing press. Dedicated to the humble Russian Spiritual Counsels ....................................................27 Little Russian Philokalia Series .....................32 monk Herman—who, in 1794, was one of the first to bring the Orthodox Elder Paisios of Mount Athos ............................33 Gospel of Christ to North America—the St. Herman Brotherhood seeks For Young People .........................................................35 to combine the monastic life with the spread of spiritual
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of Ethnicity in Southern Bessarabia: Tracing the Histories Of
    The Making of Ethnicity in Southern Bessarabia: Tracing the histories of an ambiguous concept in a contested land Dissertation Zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophie (Dr. phil.) vorgelegt der Philosophischen Fakultät I Sozialwissenschaften und historische Kulturwissenschaften der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, von Herrn Simon Schlegel geb. am 23. April 1983 in Rorschach (Schweiz) Datum der Verteidigung 26. Mai 2016 Gutachter: PD Dr. phil. habil. Dittmar Schorkowitz, Dr. Deema Kaneff, Prof. Dr. Gabriela Lehmann-Carli Contents Deutsche Zusammenfassung ...................................................................................................................................... iii 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Questions and hypotheses ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.2. History and anthropology, some methodological implications ................................................. 6 1.3. Locating the field site and choosing a name for it ........................................................................ 11 1.4. A brief historical outline .......................................................................................................................... 17 1.5. Ethnicity, natsional’nost’, and nationality: definitions and translations ............................
    [Show full text]
  • The Life and Mission of St. Paisius Velichkovsky. 1722–1794. an Early Mod- Ern Master of the Orthodox Spiritual Life
    The Life and Mission of St. Paisius Velichkovsky. 1722–1794. An Early Mod- ern Master of the Orthodox Spiritual Life John A. MCGuckin Many people today have become familiar with the figure of the Russian Pilgrim. The book, The Way of a Pilgrim purports to have been written as the 157 autobiographical record of a poor and barely educated Russian peasant of the 19th century. Treading his way across the Steppes, enduring countless hardships and adventures as he persevered, gripped only with the reading of his beloved book of the spiritual writers of the Early Church, he directed all his mental energies around the countless recitation: “Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me a sinner.” This famous story is designed to advocate how the prayer of the heart can happen if one wills it: a mystical transitioning from prayer on the lips, to prayer in the mind, to prayer of the heart: namely, prayer in the deepest levels of the human spirit’s personal communion with the Risen Christ. The work in its English translation had a remarkable resonance in 20th century Europe and America; so much so, that nowadays if one asks about the spirituality of the pilgrim, most would think first of Russia and its mystical tra- dition of the Jesus Prayer, and perhaps hardly at all of the Puritans! The book’s popularity was helped along, doubtless, by its starred appearance in J.D. Salin- ger’s Franny and Zooey in 1961. It first came out in 1884 in a Russian version entitled: “Candid Tales of a Pilgrim to His Spiritual Father.” In all likelihood it emanated originally from the St.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Geographers and the Great Patriotic War, 1941E1945: Lev Berg and Andrei Grigor’Ev
    Journal of Historical Geography xxx (2014) 1e10 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Historical Geography journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jhg Feature: European Geographers and World War II Soviet geographers and the Great Patriotic War, 1941e1945: Lev Berg and Andrei Grigor’ev Denis J.B. Shaw* and Jonathan D. Oldfield School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK Abstract The significance of the Second World War for Soviet geography was somewhat different from that in much of the West. In the USSR, as a result of the 1917 Russian Revolution and, more particularly, of Joseph Stalin’s ‘Great Turn’ implemented in 1929e1933, geographers were faced with pronounced political and economic challenges of a kind which arguably only confronted most Western geographers with the onset of war. It is therefore impossible to un- derstand the impact of the war for Soviet geography without taking into account this broader context, including events during the turbulent post-war years. The paper will focus on the experiences of two prominent geographers who played a major role in the developments of the era including their responses to the revolutionary circumstances occurring from the late 1920s, their activities and experiences during the war, and the debates and conflicts they engaged in during the post-war crisis. Some of the more significant contrasts with geographical developments in Western countries during these years will be emphasized. Ó 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). Keywords: Soviet geography; Andrei Grigor’ev; Lev Berg; USSR Academy of Sciences Institute of Geography; Stalin era Towards the end of January, 1947, just three years after the lifting of geographers, especially those working in the Office of Strategic the German blockade of the city by Soviet forces, some 600 or so Services (OSS) in Washington DC.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthodox News
    home news features sayings jottings review stock order s ORTHODOX NEWS Published by St George Orthodox Information Service The White House, Mettingham, Suffolk NR35 1TP 01986 895176 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.mettingham.org.uk ISSN 0267 8470 Winter 2013 Vol. 25 No. 1 PATRIARCH JOHN X Former Metropolitan of Western Europe becomes Patriarch of Antioch Following his election by Divine Lot on 17 December of the enthronement of His Beatitude John X, Patriarch 2012, Metropolitan John, whose former diocese of the Great Antioch of All the East. included Great Britain & Ireland, was enthroned as John X, Patriarch of the Great Antioch of All the East Among the worshippers were Lebanon’s President M. on 10 Feb 2013. Suleiman, Lebanon’s Prime Minister N. Mikati, Russia’s ambassador to Lebanon A. Zasypkin, The celebrations began with the Divine Liturgy Ukrainian ambassador V. Koval, and other diplomats celebrated in St. Nicholas’s Cathedral in Beirut by accredited in Beirut. There were also Cardinal K. Koch, Patriarch John X, Archbishop Chrysostomos of New president of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Justiniana and All Cyprus and Metropolitan Christopher Christian Unity, Maronite Patriarch Bechara Boutros of the Czech Lands and Slovakia. Participating in the Cardinal Al-Rahi, Greek-Catholic Melkite Patriarch liturgy were hierarchs and clergy of the Local Orthodox Gregory III, Syro-Malabar Patriarch Ignatius Joseph III, Churches who came to Beirut for the celebrations. Syriac Jacobite Patriarch Mar Ignatius Zakka I Ivas of Antioch, Catholicos Aram I of the Great House of The Russian Orthodox Church’s delegation led by Cilicia, as well as representatives of other non- Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk, head of the Orthodox confessions and public figures in Lebanon Moscow Patriarchate’s department for external church and Syria.
    [Show full text]
  • Nel Grillaert Ghent University Department of Slavonic and East
    Nel Grillaert Ghent University Department of Slavonic and East European Studies Rozier 44 9000 Gent Belgium [email protected] Tel.: 0032 9 264 39 91 Fax: 0032 9 264 38 10 What’s in God’s Name: literary forerunners and philosophical allies of the imjaslavie debate 1 Abstract: The aim of this paper is to explore the interaction between a tradition that belongs originally to the realm of orthodox contemplative monasticism (i.e., hesychasm) and nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Russian intellectuals. In the first part, this paper will explore how hesychasm gradually penetrated nineteenth-century secular culture; a special focus will be on the hermitage of Optina Pustyn’ and its renowned elders, as well as their appeal to members of the Optina-intelligentsia, especially Fëdor Dostoevskij. Then, attention will shift to the imjaslavie controversy at the beginning of the twentieth century, which flared up initially as a dispute between Athonite monks and reached a sad culmination in 1912-13 with a manu militari intervention by troops of the Russian Holy Synod. However, the debate was taken up by some prominent intellectuals of the Russian religious renaissance, such as Pavel Florenskij, Nikolaj Berdjaev and Sergej Bulgakov, who explicitly sided with the imjaslavcy (“Glorifiers of the Name”) and actively stepped into the debate. Keywords: hesychasm, elderhood, Optina-intelligentsia, imjaslavie, religious philosophers А в Оптиной мне больше не бывать (Anna Akhmatova, 1940) И поныне на Афоне Древо чудное растет, На крутом зеленом склоне Имя Божие поет (Osip Mandel’štam, 1915) Introduction The history of Russian Orthodoxy is marked by an increasing split between the theology prescribed by the ecclesiastical authorities and the faith of the Russian believers.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthodox News, Summer/Autumn 2012, Vol. 24 No
    home news features sayings jottings links stock order s ORTHODOX NEWS Published by St George Orthodox Information Service The White House, Mettingham, Suffolk NR35 1TP 01986 895176 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.mettingham.org.uk ISSN 0267 8470 Summer/Autumn 2012 First Electronic Issue Vol. 24 No. 3 & 4 Archimandrite Nikolai (Karpov) with [moving right] Princess Catherine Galitzine and Grand Duchess Xenia MEMORY ETERNAL! 80th Anniversary of the Repose of Vladika Nikolai (Karpov) Bishop of London n September 1972, St George Orthodox Information Archimandrite Nikolai was 38 years old at the time. In Service published an article to mark the 40th 1915 he had finished his studies at the Moscow I anniversary of the repose of Bishop Nikolai Theological Academy, and afterwards he taught at (Karpov) of London who died on 11 October 1932. This theological schools in Russia, and preached at the year we have arrived at the 80th anniversary and it Oboyan Convent in the Diocese of Kursk. Abroad, in seems appropriate to reprint the article. Extracts from the kingdom of Serbia, he acted as priest in several Volume 5 of the biography of Metropolitan Antony parishes, before becoming lecturer at the Butol (Khrapovitski) of Kiev and Galicia, who later became Theological Seminary, where he was greatly loved by the first Chief Hierarch of the Synod of the Russian the staff and pupils. He was then appointed priest in Orthodox Church Outside Russia, form the basis of the charge of the Russian Orthodox parish in London, article. The book was written by Archbishop Nikon of which was rent by internal dissension at that time.
    [Show full text]
  • TOWARDS a SEMIOTIC BIOLOGY Life Is the Action of Signs
    • TOWARDS [ ASEMIOTIC ' BIOLOGY Life is the Action of Signs Imperial College Press TOWARDS A SEMIOTIC BIOLOGY Life is the Action of Signs P771tp.indd 1 5/3/11 5:22 PM TOWARDS A SEMIOTIC BIOLOGY Life is the Action of Signs Sense world s si interpretant io m e s Receptor Sense net Carrier of a feature sign Internal world Object Opposite structure Effect net Carrier of an effect representamen object Effector Effect world Editors Claus Emmeche University of Copenhagen, Denmark Kalevi Kull University of Tartu, Estonia Imperial College Press ICP P771tp.indd 2 5/3/11 5:22 PM This page is intentionally left blank Published by Imperial College Press 57 Shelton Street Covent Garden London WC2H 9HE Distributed by World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. 5 Toh Tuck Link, Singapore 596224 USA office: 27 Warren Street, Suite 401-402, Hackensack, NJ 07601 UK office: 57 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London WC2H 9HE British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. TOWARDS A SEMIOTIC BIOLOGY Life is the Action of Signs Copyright © 2011 by Imperial College Press All rights reserved. This book, or parts thereof, may not be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage and retrieval system now known or to be invented, without written permission from the Publisher. For photocopying of material in this volume, please pay a copying fee through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. In this case permission to photocopy is not required from the publisher.
    [Show full text]