1. RESPONSIBLE SERVICE the Air Traffic Services Are Provided In
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
La Gomera Airport 2019 · 2020
La Gomera Airport 2019 · 2020 / 26/2/2019 MAPA La Gomera Canary Islands Aena Spanish Airports (excluding MCV, QSA, SBO exclusive for GA) 1/1 26/2/2019 CONTENTS Contents La Gomera Highlights La Gomera Airport Traffic statistics Route map Passenger profile Operational data Infrastructures & facilities Quality, environment & awards Measures against COVID-19 Our commitment with sustainability Incentives & marketing support Annex: Traffic statistics 1/1 Highlights 2019 · 2020 La Gomera 2019 2020 78K 54K % Var. previous year % Var. previous year Pax 25,3 % -29,9 % 2,8K 2,2K % Var. previous year % Var. previous year Ops 6,4 % -24,1 % 1,9K 1,0K % Var. previous year % Var. previous year Cargo 4,2 % -45,0 % Source: Aena. Provisional non-audited data 2020 (round trip) / 24/2/2020 HIGHLIGHTS (II) Highlights 2019 La Gomera Avg. pax / week Avg. ops / week 1,5K 55 1 1 2 Domestic Destinations 2 * Countries * 2 Airlines * Routes 39% business · Residence · 64% GMZ apt. province 25% rest of Spain Pax profile 11% foreign Sources: * + 5,000 pax/year. Aena 2019 (round trip) Aena surveys 1/1 Traffic statistics La Gomera Annual traffic evolution Pax % Var. Pax 21% 25% 28% 27% 78K 20% 62K 9% 54K 49K 0% 38K 35K -20% -30% 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Monthly traffic evolution · 2019 11,5K 10K 9,4K 9,1K 6,1K 6,1K 5,2K 5,3K 5,4K 5,4K 4,9K 4,8K 4,5K 5K 0K 1 Ene 2 Feb 3 Mar 4 Abr 5 May 6 Jun 7 Jul 8 Ago 9 Sep 10 Oct 11 Nov 12 Dic 68 % Source: Summer season Aena. -
[email protected] C/ Fruela, 6 Fax: +34 91 463 55 35 28011 Madrid (España) Foreword
CICIAIAIACAC COMISIÓN DE INVESTIGACIÓN DE ACCIDENTES E INCIDENTES DE AVIACIÓN CIVIL Report A-016/2016 Accident involving a Robin DR-400-180 aircraft, registration F-GXBB, in the town of Arbizu, Navarre (Spain) on 19 May 2016 Report A-016/2016 Accident involving a Robin DR-400-180 aircraft, registration F-GXBB, in the town of Arbizu, Navarre (Spain) on 19 May 2016 SUBSECRETARÍA GOBIERNO MINISTERIO DE ESPAÑA DE FOMENTO COMISIÓN DE INVESTIGACIÓN DE ACCIDENTES E INCIDENTES DE AVIACIÓN CIVIL © Ministerio de Fomento Secretaría General Técnica Centro de Publicaciones NIPO Línea: 161-18-122-X NIPO Papel: 161-18-123-5 Depósito legal: M-16715-2018 Maquetación: David García Arcos Impresión: Centro de Publicaciones COMISIÓN DE INVESTIGACIÓN DE ACCIDENTES E INCIDENTES DE AVIACIÓN CIVIL Tel.: +34 91 597 89 63 E-mail: [email protected] C/ Fruela, 6 Fax: +34 91 463 55 35 http://www.ciaiac.es 28011 Madrid (España) Foreword This report is a technical document that reflects the point of view of the Civil Aviation Accident and Incident Investigation Commission (CIAIAC) regarding the circumstances of the accident object of the investigation, and its probable causes and consequences. In accordance with the provisions in Article 5.4.1 of Annex 13 of the International Civil Aviation Convention; and with articles 5.5 of Regulation (UE) nº 996/2010, of the European Parliament and the Council, of 20 October 2010; Article 15 of Law 21/2003 on Air Safety and articles 1., 4. and 21.2 of Regulation 389/1998, this investigation is exclusively of a technical nature, and its objective is the prevention of future civil aviation accidents and incidents by issuing, if necessary, safety recommendations to prevent from their reoccurrence. -
Aena Magazine Rich.Indd 11 21/5/07 18:15:12 12 347332392383475498774709909029989935499
An official report for the aviation community. 3 Contents P.4 Javier Marin Director of Spanish airports Madrid Barajas A national asset P.8 José Manuel Hesse The ‘architect’ of Plan Barajas Award-winning P.27 Architectural design Maria Dolores Izquierdo P.33 P.11 Retail – every case is different Plan Barcelona The engine of Catalonia Innovation in IT P.38 P.17 First-rate, in-house expertise The Malaga plan A benchmark for tourist airports A three-way partnership P.20 Air navigation, airlines and airports The Levante Plan P.41 Alicante and Valencia Security P.24First, last and always Canarias plan P.47 The lucky airports P.51 4 Madrid Barajas Spain’s window on the world Airport Business asked Aena’s director of Spanish airports Javier Marin to spell out the significance of Plan Barajas, including the award-winning Madrid Barajas Terminal 4. John Frank-Keyes reports. “ 5 adrid Barajas is absolutely vital for air transport in Spain because of its hub function. However, we faced significant capacity limitations, so these infrastructure developments were crucial – and not just for Madrid, but for Spain and indeed for Europe. We now have the capacity to move up from being Europe’s fifth-ranked airport, and indeed it is something we have been able to achieve as we are now fourth in the first quarter of 2007,” Marin replied. Previously, Barajas had hourly runway capacity of 78 movements per hour with passenger mgrowth of about 8% a year. “The full benefits of the new capacity have really been felt with the advent of the winter season when we have been able to offer 90 movements per hour. -
63 Special Issue
revistaitransporte.com ineco.com itransporteTRANSPORT ENGINEERING & CONSULTANCY | | aniversario 63 SPECIAL ISSUE THE FIRST FIFTY YEARS THE JOURNEY HAS ONLY 50JUST BEGUN Ready to travel? contents EDITORIAL / PRESIDENTS 04 50 YEARS OF NEWS (1968-2018) 06 THE FIRST PROJECTS (1968-1982) 12 A GIANT LEAP FORWARD (1983-1992) 16 MAJOR INFRASTRUCTURE (1993-1999) 22 THE NEW MILLENNIUM (2000-2007) 28 Aena’s network of airports makes it easy CREATING BRAND SPAIN (2008-2018) 42 • The best selection of leisure, dining and shopping facilities • The widest selection of parking options, and the best price • Renovated VIP Lounges UNIQUE AND OUT OF THE ORDINARY 58 • Free Wi-Fi And all the services you need to start enjoying your trip even before you reach your destination. published by ineco Paseo de La Habana, 138 - 28036 Madrid – Tel. 91 452 12 56 – www.revistaitransporte.com Editor-in-Chief: BÁRBARA JIMÉNEZ-ALFARO – [email protected] Editorial Staff: LIDIA AMIGO – [email protected] Editorial Board: ISABEL ÁLVAREZ, MICHAEL ASHIABOR, NATALIA DÍAZ, JosÉ Gonzalez, JUAN R. HERNÁNDEZ, RAFAEL HERRERA, rafael MOLINA, SERGIO NAVARRO, Javier SANCHO, JARA valbuenA Design, layout, editing and web: ESTUDIO 2729 | juanjo JIMÉNEZ, almudena VALDECANTOS, TERESA COMPAIRÉ, YOLANDA MARTÍNEZ Printed by: NILO GRÁFICA Legal Deposit: M-26791-2007 ©Ineco. All rights reserved (2018). If you wish to reprint these articles or unsubscribe, please, contact the Editor-in-Chief. Follow us: itransporte — 3 P R E S I D E N T S and the story continues Carlos Roa Juan de Arespacochaga Emilio Magdalena Pelayo Martínez (TIFSA) editorial 1968 | 1971-1983 1968-1971 1983-1988 1983-1989 o celebrate Ineco’s 50th anniversary, this special issue of Itransporte is ❝Special thanks also go dedicated to looking back on the most important events of the company’s history as recounted by some of the key people who participated and wit- to all of those friends nessed it. -
Regional Fact Sheets – Municipality of Burgos
Regional fact sheets – Municipality of Burgos Deliverable D4.2 Burgos City Council José María Diez • Patricia Cecín September 2014 Contract N°: IEE/12/970/S12.670555 Table of contents 1 Spatial Analysis 3 1.1 Short overview of the Burgos area characteristics 3 1.2 The area geography and constraints 4 1.3 Transport and mobility infrastructure offered 6 2 Socioeconomic and demographic structure 7 3 Local public transport systems 8 4 References 12 D4.2: Regional fact sheets – Municipality of Burgos 2 1 Spatial Analysis 1.1 Short overview of the Burgos area characteristics Burgos is a city in northern Spain and the historic capital of Castile. It is situated in the middle of the roads Madrid-Bilbao and Barcelona-Santiago de Compostela, at the edge of the Iberian central plateau. It has about 180,000 inhabitants in the actual city and another 20,000 in the metropolitan area. It is the capital of the province of Burgos, in the autonomous community of Castile and León. Burgos was once the capital of the Crown of Castile. It has many historic landmarks, of particular importance; the Cathedral of Burgos (declared World Heritage Site by UNESCO in 1984), Las Huelgas Reales Monastery and Miraflores Charterhouse. A large number of churches, palaces and other buildings from the medieval age remain. The Pilgrims Way is crossing the City (parallel to the river Arlanzon) and the Prehistoric Site of Atapuerca is only 15 km far from the city. Both also have been declared World Heritage Site. Picture 1.1: The location of the Municipality of Burgos in Spain. -
Consolidated Management Report for the Three-Month Period Ending on 31 March 2017
Consolidated Management Report for the three-month period ending on 31 March 2017 Webcast / Conference-call: Telephones: Wednesday, 26 April 2017 Spain: +34 91 114 65 83 13:00 (Madrid time) United Kingdom: +44 (0) 203 427 1900 http://edge.media-server.com/m/p/d2fodtgi USA: +1646 254 3364 Access code: 1352753 WorldReginfo - 7fc93840-77ca-4a87-83ac-d5ab38a0202a Management Report Q1 2017 l Aena, S.A. 1. Executive summary The first quarter of 2017 saw a Likewise, traffic during the passengers in the Spanish airport continuation of Aena’s outstanding first quarter of the year network, although this growth was performance in 2016 and has been continued to show a notable impacted by the different base of characterised by the following increase in the majority of comparison since 2016 was a leap noteworthy aspects: airports managed by Aena, year and Easter was in March. although both the volumes of On 27 January 2017, the Council This increase is reflected both in traffic and the passenger mix of Ministers approved the Airport domestic traffic growing by 3.2% Regulation Document (DORA) were affected by the different (14.8 million passengers) and for the period 2017-2021, in base of comparison since international traffic which totalled which the minimum service 2016 was a leap year and 30.4 million passengers, an increase conditions that will be in force in Easter was in March. of 8.0%. The main airports continue airports in the AENA network are Passenger traffic (including to reflect this upswing: Adolfo set out the next five years, Luton airport) grew to 48.7 Suárez Madrid-Barajas (6.0%), providing a foreseeable million (+7.1%). -
EU-Funded Airport Infrastructures: Poor Value for Money
EN 2014 NO 21 Special Report EU-funded airport infrastructures: poor value for money EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi 1615 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tel. +352 4398-1 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://eca.europa.eu Twitter: @EUAuditorsECA YouTube: EUAuditorsECA More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2014 ISBN 978-92-872-1253-5 doi:10.2865/96815 © European Union, 2014 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Luxembourg EN 2014 NO 21 Special Report EU-funded airport infrastructures: poor value for money (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) Contents 02 Paragraph Glossary I–V Executive summary 1–15 Introduction 1–5 Main characteristics of air transport in Europe 6–8 EU air transport policy and funding of airport infrastructures 9–11 The management of investments in airport infrastructures under the ERDF and CF 12–15 Types of airport infrastructures examined 16–21 Audit scope and approach 22–67 Observations 22–26 Need for new or upgraded infrastructures demonstrated for half of the airports examined 27 Delays in constructions for most and cost overruns for half of the airports examined 28–35 More than half of the constructions were under-used 36–38 EU funding for investments which are not cost-effective 39–45 Seven of the 20 audited airports are not financially self-sustainable 46–48 Forecast of passenger numbers significantly over-optimistic -
A Hybrid Optimal Control Approach to Fuel Efficient Aircraft Conflict Avoidance
This is a postprint version of the following document: Soler, M., Kamgarpour, M., Lloret, J. y Lygeros, J. (2016). A Hybrid Optimal Control Approach to Fuel Efficient Aircraft Conflict Avoidance. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17(7), pp. 1826 - 1838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2015.2510824 © 2016 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/ republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works. SUBMITTED TO IEEE TRANSACTION ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS ON NOVEMBER 2014 1 A Hybrid Optimal Control Approach to Fuel Efficient Aircraft Conflict Avoidance Manuel Soler, Maryam Kamgarpour, Javier Lloret, and John Lygeros, Fellow, IEEE Abstract—We formulate fuel optimal conflict free aircraft the ATCOs would still be in the loop, and thus trajectories trajectory planning as a hybrid optimal control problem. The should also be cognitive friendly. This ensures high levels of discrete modes of the hybrid system capture the air traffic efficiency and safety via automation, yet accounts for human’s procedures for conflict resolution, e. g., speed and turn advisories. In order to solve problems of realistic dimensions arising from trust and acceptance. In this work, we propose an optimal air traffic sector planning, we formulate a numerically tractable control framework, consistent with the operational procedures approach to solve the hybrid optimal control problem. The of ATCOs, pilots and autopilots, for minimum fuel conflict approach is based on introducing binary functions for each mode, resolution in pre-tactical (20 minutes to one hour) trajectory relaxing the binary functions and including a penalty term on planning. -
[email protected] C/ Fruela, 6 Fax: +34 91 463 55 35 28011 Madrid (España) Notice
CICIAIAIACAC COMISIÓN DE INVESTIGACIÓN DE ACCIDENTES E INCIDENTES DE AVIACIÓN CIVIL Report IN-017/2017 Serious incident involving a Boeing B787-900, registration N825AA, and a Cessna 172-M, registration EC-IEO, in the Madrid TMA on 8 August 2017 Report IN-017/2017 Serious incident involving a Boeing B787-900, registration N825AA, and a Cessna 172-M, registration EC-IEO, in the Madrid TMA on 8 August 2017 SUBSECRETARÍA GOBIERNO MINISTERIO DE ESPAÑA DE FOMENTO COMISIÓN DE INVESTIGACIÓN DE ACCIDENTES E INCIDENTES DE AVIACIÓN CIVIL © Ministerio de Fomento Secretaría General Técnica Centro de Publicaciones NIPO Línea: 161-18-244-2 NIPO Papel: 161-18-247-9 Deposito Legal: M-36530-2018 Maquetación: ASAP Global Solution S.L. Impresión: Centro de Publicaciones COMISIÓN DE INVESTIGACIÓN DE ACCIDENTES E INCIDENTES DE AVIACIÓN CIVIL Tel.: +34 91 597 89 63 E-mail: [email protected] C/ Fruela, 6 Fax: +34 91 463 55 35 http://www.ciaiac.es 28011 Madrid (España) Notice This report is a technical document that reflects the point of view of the Civil Aviation Accident and Incident Investigation Commission (CIAIAC) regarding the circumstances of the accident object of the investigation, and its probable causes and consequences. In accordance with the provisions in Article 5.4.1 of Annex 13 of the International Civil Aviation Convention; and with articles 5.5 of Regulation (UE) nº 996/2010, of the European Parliament and the Council, of 20 October 2010; Article 15 of Law 21/2003 on Air Safety and articles 1., 4. and 21.2 of Regulation 389/1998, this investigation is exclusively of a technical nature, and its objective is the prevention of future civil aviation accidents and incidents by issuing, if necessary, safety recommendations to prevent from their reoccurrence. -
Regional Public Support to Airlines and Airports: an Unsolved Puzzle
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UCrea Regional public support to airlines and airports: an unsolved puzzle Ramón Núñez Sánchez January 20, 2015 Abstract This paper proposes a structural model to explain the motivation of regional public authorities to arrange marketing agreements for route and tra¢ c development. Furthermore, using data from Spanish airports, we empirically test this model obtaining the demand function according to the preferences of public authorities. The results show that the public budget, airport’s attributes or intermodal competition a¤ect to the demand for aircraft operations of regional public agencies. Finally, we propose an empirical method to determine the market power of airlines within these marketing agreements in a particular airport or route. 1 Introduction In recent years, some airports have experienced a signi…cant increase in air tra¢ c due to the liberalization in the air transport market. In some cases, this phenomenon has been related to the existence of new transport policy tools which aim to promote the use of airport infrastructure with idle capacity. In this way, an increasing number of regional airports have received the support of their regional governments through …nancial arrangements with air carriers in order to open new routes, as well as to provide advertising services linked to the permanence of the air carrier at a given airport. Indeed, airport managers have more incentives to negotiate long-term contracts with air carriers in order to reduce the risk of tra¢ c loss for their installations (Gillen, 2011). -
European Hub Airports – Assessment of Constraints for Market Power in the Local Catchment and on the Transfer Market
Technische Universität Dresden Fakultät Verkehrswissenschaften „Friedrich List” Institut für Wirtschaft und Verkehr DISSERTATION European Hub Airports – Assessment of Constraints for Market Power in the Local Catchment and on the Transfer Market zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doctor rerum politicarum (Dr. rer. pol.) im Rahmen des Promotionsverfahrens an der Fakultät Verkehrswissenschaften „Friedrich List“ der Technischen Universität Dresden vorgelegt von: Annika Paul, geb. Reinhold geb. am 30.09.1981 in Gifhorn Gutachter: Prof. Dr. rer. pol. habil. Bernhard Wieland Prof. Dr. rer. pol. Hans-Martin Niemeier Ort und Tage der Einreichung: Dresden, 23. Januar 2018 Ort und Tag der Verteidigung: Dresden, 04. Juni 2018 Abstract Airports have long been considered as an industry in which firms are able to exert significant market power. Nowadays, there is controversial discussion whether airports face a degree of competition which is sufficient to constrain potentially abusive behaviour resulting from this market power. The level of competition encountered by European airports has hence been evaluated by analysing the switching potential of both airlines and passengers between different airports, for example. The research within this thesis contributes to the field of airport competition by analysing the degree of potential competition 36 European hub airports face on their origin-destination market in their local catchments as well as on the transfer market within the period from 2000 to 2016. For this purpose, a two-step approach is applied for each market, with first analysing the degree of market concentration, using the Herfindahl Hirschman Index as a measure, for each destination offered at the hub airports and the respective development over time. -
KODY LOTNISK ICAO Niniejsze Zestawienie Zawiera 8372 Kody Lotnisk
KODY LOTNISK ICAO Niniejsze zestawienie zawiera 8372 kody lotnisk. Zestawienie uszeregowano: Kod ICAO = Nazwa portu lotniczego = Lokalizacja portu lotniczego AGAF=Afutara Airport=Afutara AGAR=Ulawa Airport=Arona, Ulawa Island AGAT=Uru Harbour=Atoifi, Malaita AGBA=Barakoma Airport=Barakoma AGBT=Batuna Airport=Batuna AGEV=Geva Airport=Geva AGGA=Auki Airport=Auki AGGB=Bellona/Anua Airport=Bellona/Anua AGGC=Choiseul Bay Airport=Choiseul Bay, Taro Island AGGD=Mbambanakira Airport=Mbambanakira AGGE=Balalae Airport=Shortland Island AGGF=Fera/Maringe Airport=Fera Island, Santa Isabel Island AGGG=Honiara FIR=Honiara, Guadalcanal AGGH=Honiara International Airport=Honiara, Guadalcanal AGGI=Babanakira Airport=Babanakira AGGJ=Avu Avu Airport=Avu Avu AGGK=Kirakira Airport=Kirakira AGGL=Santa Cruz/Graciosa Bay/Luova Airport=Santa Cruz/Graciosa Bay/Luova, Santa Cruz Island AGGM=Munda Airport=Munda, New Georgia Island AGGN=Nusatupe Airport=Gizo Island AGGO=Mono Airport=Mono Island AGGP=Marau Sound Airport=Marau Sound AGGQ=Ontong Java Airport=Ontong Java AGGR=Rennell/Tingoa Airport=Rennell/Tingoa, Rennell Island AGGS=Seghe Airport=Seghe AGGT=Santa Anna Airport=Santa Anna AGGU=Marau Airport=Marau AGGV=Suavanao Airport=Suavanao AGGY=Yandina Airport=Yandina AGIN=Isuna Heliport=Isuna AGKG=Kaghau Airport=Kaghau AGKU=Kukudu Airport=Kukudu AGOK=Gatokae Aerodrome=Gatokae AGRC=Ringi Cove Airport=Ringi Cove AGRM=Ramata Airport=Ramata ANYN=Nauru International Airport=Yaren (ICAO code formerly ANAU) AYBK=Buka Airport=Buka AYCH=Chimbu Airport=Kundiawa AYDU=Daru Airport=Daru