Naturalized in North America
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Stormwater Facility Plant Lists
APPENDIX A - TABLES Stormwater Facility and Plant List Table of Contents Appendix A - Planting Guide for Vegetated Stormwater Facilities ............................................... Page A.4 Stormwater Facility Plant List .......................................................................................... A-1 A.4.1 Selecting Plants ........................................................................................................ A-1 TABLE 1: Plant List: Planters (Infiltration and Filtration) .......................................... A-2 TABLE 2: Plant List: Rain Gardens and Swales (Infiltration and Filtration) ............. A-3 TABLE 3: Plant List: Constructed Wet Ponds .......................................................... A-4 TABLE 3: Plant List: Constructed Wet Ponds (cont.) ............................................... A-5 TABLE 4: Plant List: Vegetated Filter Strips ............................................................. A-6 TABLE 4: Plant List: Vegetated Filter Strips (cont.) .................................................. A-7 TABLE 5: Plant List: Green Roofs ............................................................................ A-8 A.4 Stormwater Facility Plant List A.4.1. Selecting Plants The plant lists provided in the following tables are separated by facility type (such as planters, rain gardens, green roof, etc.). Each facility list includes a suitability matrix for limiting contextual factors (such as moisture zones and width of facility) as well as a listing of specific characteristics -
New Distribution Records for Flowering Plants in Antigonish County, Nova Scotia
PROC. N.S. INST. SCI. (2008) Volume 44, Part 2, pp. 109-123 NEW DISTRIBUTION RECORDS FOR FLOWERING PLANTS IN ANTIGONISH COUNTY, NOVA SCOTIA BARRY R. TAYLOR, JONATHAN FERRIER, RANDOLPH LAUFF, DAVID J. GARBARY* Department of Biology St. Francis Xavier University P.O. Box 5000 Antigonish, Nova Scotia B2G 2W5 Distributions of over 50 species of flowering plants from Antigonish County, Nova Scotia are presented based on collections made primarily over the last ten years. Some of these are new county records representing range extensions from the western and central parts of the province. Many are new records for the eastern mainland and north shores of the province. Rare species discussed are Asclepias incarnata, Comandra umbellata and Triosteum aurantiacum. Several species, including Asparagus officinalis, Centaurea cyanus, Lathyrus latifolius, Lysimachia nummularia, and Origanum vulgare, likely represent recent or older garden escapes. Sedum ochroleucum is reported outside of cultivation for the first time from Nova Scotia, based on a single population that has been established for at least two years. On décrit la répartition de plus de 50 espèces d’angiospermes dans le comté d’Antigonish (Nouvelle-Écosse), d’après des collectes effectuées essentiellement les dix dernières années. Il s’agit parfois de nouveaux cas signalés dans le comté, représentant des prolongements de l’aire de répartition depuis l’ouest et le centre de la province et, dans bien d’autres cas, de nouveaux signalements pour l’est de la péninsule et les côtes nord de la province. Les espèces rares présentées sont Asclepias incarnata, Comandra umbellata et Triosteum aurantiacum. Plusieurs espèces comme Asparagus officinalis, Centaurea cyanus, Lathyrus latifolius, Lysimachia nummularia et Origanum vulgare sont vraisemblablement des plantes échappées de cultures. -
Nymphaea Folia Naturae Bihariae Xli
https://biblioteca-digitala.ro MUZEUL ŢĂRII CRIŞURILOR NYMPHAEA FOLIA NATURAE BIHARIAE XLI Editura Muzeului Ţării Crişurilor Oradea 2014 https://biblioteca-digitala.ro 2 Orice corespondenţă se va adresa: Toute correspondence sera envoyée à l’adresse: Please send any mail to the Richten Sie bitte jedwelche following adress: Korrespondenz an die Addresse: MUZEUL ŢĂRII CRIŞURILOR RO-410464 Oradea, B-dul Dacia nr. 1-3 ROMÂNIA Redactor şef al publicațiilor M.T.C. Editor-in-chief of M.T.C. publications Prof. Univ. Dr. AUREL CHIRIAC Colegiu de redacţie Editorial board ADRIAN GAGIU ERIKA POSMOŞANU Dr. MÁRTON VENCZEL, redactor responsabil Comisia de referenţi Advisory board Prof. Dr. J. E. McPHERSON, Southern Illinois Univ. at Carbondale, USA Prof. Dr. VLAD CODREA, Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca Prof. Dr. MASSIMO OLMI, Universita degli Studi della Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy Dr. MIKLÓS SZEKERES Institute of Plant Biology, Szeged Lector Dr. IOAN SÎRBU Universitatea „Lucian Blaga”,Sibiu Prof. Dr. VASILE ŞOLDEA, Universitatea Oradea Prof. Univ. Dr. DAN COGÂLNICEANU, Universitatea Ovidius, Constanţa Lector Univ. Dr. IOAN GHIRA, Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca Prof. Univ. Dr. IOAN MĂHĂRA, Universitatea Oradea GABRIELA ANDREI, Muzeul Naţional de Ist. Naturală “Grigora Antipa”, Bucureşti Fondator Founded by Dr. SEVER DUMITRAŞCU, 1973 ISSN 0253-4649 https://biblioteca-digitala.ro 3 CUPRINS CONTENT Botanică Botany VASILE MAXIM DANCIU & DORINA GOLBAN: The Theodor Schreiber Herbarium in the Botanical Collection of the Ţării Crişurilor Museum in -
Trophic Resource Use and Partitioning in Multispecies Ungulate Communities
Trophic resource use and partitioning in multispecies ungulate communities Robert Spitzer Faculty of Forest Sciences Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies Umeå Doctoral thesis Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Umeå 2019 Acta Universitatis agriculturae Sueciae 2019:73 Cover: Annual diet composition of deer in Sweden (artworK: R. Spitzer) ISSN 1652-6880 ISBN (print version) 978-91-7760-464-8 ISBN (electronic version) 978-91-7760-465-5 © 2019 Robert Spitzer, Umeå Print: Original trycKeri, Umeå 2019 Trophic resource use and partitioning in multispecies ungulate communities Abstract Over the past decades, ungulates across the northern hemisphere have been expanding in range and numbers. This has raised concerns about their impacts, particularly on shared resources with humans, e.g., timber trees. Understanding how different ungulate species use trophic resources is therefore a crucial component of managing their populations. In this thesis, I synthesized data from the literature and used faecal DNA metabarcoding to investigate diets and patterns of resource partitioning for ungulate communities in Sweden and at the European scale. I also evaluated the reliability of dung morphometry for identifying ungulate species. I found that species identification of faecal pellets is difficult where similar-sized ungulates coexist which questions the reliability of pellet counts as a monitoring technique in such systems. Dung morphometry could, however, clearly distinguish moose from the smaller deer species. Across Europe, average diets of the four main deer species fit well with predictions by Hofmann’s hypothesis of ruminant feeding types. Red and fallow deer (mixed feeders) showed larger dietary plasticity than moose and roe deer (browsers). -
Extensive Vegitative Roof Plant List
Recommended Plant List for Extensive Vegetated Roofs Fairfax County, Virginia February 1, 2007 RECOMMENDED PLANT LIST FOR EXTENSIVE VEGETATED ROOFS – Fairfax County, Virginia The following list of plants for extensive vegetated roofs was developed by staff from the Department of Public Works and Environmental Services (Storm Water Planning Division and Urban Forest Management Division). It is a “recommended” list of plants for use in extensive vegetated roofs. These plants were chosen because they are known to perform well in our area in growing medium depths of about four inches. The list is not exhaustive and is intended to give the designer a palette of plant materials to choose from. Other species may be used, and the acceptability of proposed plant materials is subject to review and approval by the Director. This plant list may be updated periodically to reflect other species that have been shown to perform well in extensive vegetated roofs in our area. Design guidelines for vegetated roofs can be found in the Public Facilities Manual § 6-1310. KEY: • Light: The amount of sunlight a plant requires is defined as: o Full sun 5, the site is in direct sunlight for at least six hours daily during the growing season. o Partial shade , the site receives approximately three to six hours of direct sunlight or lightly filtered light throughout the day. o Shade , the site receives less than three hours of direct sunlight or heavily dappled light throughout the day. • Moisture: The amount of soil moisture a plant requires is defined as: o Dry (D), areas where water does not remain after a rain; supplemental watering will not be needed, except under the most extreme drought conditions. -
Kozminska;Al;Wiszniewska
Document downloaded from: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/158945 This paper must be cited as: Kozminska, A.; Al Hassan, M.; Wiszniewska, A.; Hanus-Fajerska, E.; Boscaiu, M.; Vicente, O. (2019). Responses of succulents to drought: Comparative analysis of four Sedum (Crassulaceae) species. Scientia Horticulturae. 243:235-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.08.028 The final publication is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.08.028 Copyright Elsevier Additional Information Responses of succulents to drought: comparative analysis of four Sedum (Crassulaceae) species Aleksandra Kozminska a,b*, Mohamad Al Hassan a,c, Alina Wiszniewska b, Ewa Hanus- Fajerska b , Monica Boscaiu d, Oscar Vicente a a Institute of Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology (IBMCP, UPV-CSIC), Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain b Unit of Botany and Plant Physiology of Institute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, Department of Biotechnology and Agriculture, University of Agriculture in Krakow, 31-425 Krakow, Al. 29 Listopada 54, Poland (permanent address) c Present address: The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited (PFR), Mt Albert Research Centre, Private Bag 92169, Auckland, New Zealand (present address) d Mediterranean Agroforestry Institute (IAM, UPV), Universitat Politècnica de València, Spain, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain *corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] Abstract The increased frequency and intensity of drought periods is becoming a serious thread for agriculture, prompting the identification of crop species and cultivars with enhanced water stress tolerance. Drought responses were studied in four ornamental Sedum species under controlled greenhouse conditions, by withholding watering of the plants for four weeks. -
Threats to Australia's Grazing Industries by Garden
final report Project Code: NBP.357 Prepared by: Jenny Barker, Rod Randall,Tony Grice Co-operative Research Centre for Australian Weed Management Date published: May 2006 ISBN: 1 74036 781 2 PUBLISHED BY Meat and Livestock Australia Limited Locked Bag 991 NORTH SYDNEY NSW 2059 Weeds of the future? Threats to Australia’s grazing industries by garden plants Meat & Livestock Australia acknowledges the matching funds provided by the Australian Government to support the research and development detailed in this publication. This publication is published by Meat & Livestock Australia Limited ABN 39 081 678 364 (MLA). Care is taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication. However MLA cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the information or opinions contained in the publication. You should make your own enquiries before making decisions concerning your interests. Reproduction in whole or in part of this publication is prohibited without prior written consent of MLA. Weeds of the future? Threats to Australia’s grazing industries by garden plants Abstract This report identifies 281 introduced garden plants and 800 lower priority species that present a significant risk to Australia’s grazing industries should they naturalise. Of the 281 species: • Nearly all have been recorded overseas as agricultural or environmental weeds (or both); • More than one tenth (11%) have been recorded as noxious weeds overseas; • At least one third (33%) are toxic and may harm or even kill livestock; • Almost all have been commercially available in Australia in the last 20 years; • Over two thirds (70%) were still available from Australian nurseries in 2004; • Over two thirds (72%) are not currently recognised as weeds under either State or Commonwealth legislation. -
The Pennsylvania State University
The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Department of Horticulture UTILIZING SEDUM SEEDS AS AN INSTALLATION METHOD FOR GREEN ROOFS THROUGH SEED ENHANCEMENT TECHNIQUES A Dissertation in Horticulture by Kathryn Lyn McDavid 2012 Kathryn Lyn McDavid Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2012 The dissertation of Kathryn L. McDavid was reviewed and approved* by the following: Robert Berghage Associate Professor of Horticulture Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Ricky M. Bates Associate Professor of Ornamental Horticulture E. Jay Holcomb Emeritus Professor of Floriculture Robert D. Shannon Associate Professor of Agricultural Engineering Richard Marini Head and Professor of the Department of Horticulture *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT There are many benefits to installing green roofs including reducing storm water runoff and the associated problems with overloaded sewage systems, especially in high density urban areas. Green roofs also improve rain water and air quality and reduce the effect from urban heat islands by acting as thermal damper/evaporative coolers, which decrease heating and cooling costs and the subsequent pollution. Additionally, green roofs can extend the life of a roof and create natural habitats for birds and insects. They are also aesthetically pleasing which can improve people’s psychological state and productivity levels. One of the primary limitations to increased green roof installations in the United States is the cost, specifically, the high costs of labor to install the plants on the roof. The majority of green roofs today are installed using cuttings and/or plugs, nursery containers, vegetative mats, or modules. -
2021 Introductions Catalog
2021 Introductions Catalog 10702 Seaman Road • Hebron, IL 60034 • USA TEL: (815) 648-2788 TOLL FREE: (800) 648-2788 www.intrinsicperennialgardens.com January 2021 Despite the challenges of 2020, we had one of our best years. We continue to focus our attention on the plants we have found to be durable and valuable in the garden. 2021 will be my 30th year growing perennials. Here some of my favorite new introductions. Allium x ‘Big Beauty’ PPAF is showy right from spring emergence. Wide gray-green foliage is substantial followed by 18-24” stems in July. Silvery buds open to soft pink 2”+ flower heads.Lobelia cardinalis ‘Pink Flame’ is a pink twist on the normally red cardinal flower. This new seed strain is vigorous, growing 3’- 4’ tall. Ideal conditions are moist yet drained soil. Monarda bradburiana ‘Midnight Oil’ PPAF is an exceptionally vigorous and disease-free selection. Chocolatey-red new growth remains clean of foliar diseases. Same soft pink flowers with wine red spots in June on 18” tall and wide plants. Rudbeckia x ‘Sweet as Honey’ PPAF is a new look in black eyed susans. Many small yellow flowers are held on upright stems over extra thin basal foliage. It is a perfect companion with short grasses. Rudbeckia x ‘American Gold Rush’ continues to be our top seller. We have two new grass introductions. Andropogon gerardii ‘Holy Smoke’ PPAF has silvered gray foliage with nearly constant smoky purple to red highlights adding a constant complexity to it. It is very nice paired with Echinacea. One of our most exciting grass intros, Pennisetum alopecuroides ‘Pure Energy’ PPAF, is a wide blade, gold foliage fountain grass. -
The Genus Stelis Comprises Approximately 105 Species Worldwide, with About 20 to 25% of Them Occurring in the Western Palaearctic and the Middle East
Supplement 18, 144 Seiten ISSN 0250-4413 / ISBN 978-3-925064-71-8 Ansfelden,24.März 2015 The Cuckoo Bees of the Genus Panzer, 1806 in Europe, North Africa and the Middle East A Review and Identification Guide Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................ 4 General Part ............................................................................................................ 7 – Description of the Genus ........................................................................... 7 – Number of Species Described ................................................................... 7 – Species Diversity on Country Level .......................................................... 8 – Abundance of Stelis ................................................................................... 9 – Host Associations ...................................................................................... 9 – Flower Preferences ................................................................................... 15 – Flight Season ............................................................................................ 19 – Sexual Dimorphism .................................................................................. 19 – Geographic Variation ............................................................................... 19 – Taxonomy: The Subgenera of Stelis ........................................................ 20 Coverage and Methodology -
Ecological Checklist of the Missouri Flora for Floristic Quality Assessment
Ladd, D. and J.R. Thomas. 2015. Ecological checklist of the Missouri flora for Floristic Quality Assessment. Phytoneuron 2015-12: 1–274. Published 12 February 2015. ISSN 2153 733X ECOLOGICAL CHECKLIST OF THE MISSOURI FLORA FOR FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT DOUGLAS LADD The Nature Conservancy 2800 S. Brentwood Blvd. St. Louis, Missouri 63144 [email protected] JUSTIN R. THOMAS Institute of Botanical Training, LLC 111 County Road 3260 Salem, Missouri 65560 [email protected] ABSTRACT An annotated checklist of the 2,961 vascular taxa comprising the flora of Missouri is presented, with conservatism rankings for Floristic Quality Assessment. The list also provides standardized acronyms for each taxon and information on nativity, physiognomy, and wetness ratings. Annotated comments for selected taxa provide taxonomic, floristic, and ecological information, particularly for taxa not recognized in recent treatments of the Missouri flora. Synonymy crosswalks are provided for three references commonly used in Missouri. A discussion of the concept and application of Floristic Quality Assessment is presented. To accurately reflect ecological and taxonomic relationships, new combinations are validated for two distinct taxa, Dichanthelium ashei and D. werneri , and problems in application of infraspecific taxon names within Quercus shumardii are clarified. CONTENTS Introduction Species conservatism and floristic quality Application of Floristic Quality Assessment Checklist: Rationale and methods Nomenclature and taxonomic concepts Synonymy Acronyms Physiognomy, nativity, and wetness Summary of the Missouri flora Conclusion Annotated comments for checklist taxa Acknowledgements Literature Cited Ecological checklist of the Missouri flora Table 1. C values, physiognomy, and common names Table 2. Synonymy crosswalk Table 3. Wetness ratings and plant families INTRODUCTION This list was developed as part of a revised and expanded system for Floristic Quality Assessment (FQA) in Missouri. -
Generic Dividion of Sedoideae in Europe and the Adjacent Regions
Preslia, Praha, 56: 29 - 45, 1984 Generic dividion of Sedoideae in Europe and the adjacent regions R odove cleneni podceledi S edoideae v Evrope a prilehlych oblastech Vit Grulich GRULICH V. ( 1984): Gene ric rl ivision of sub f. Sedoidene in Europe and tl1c adjacent regions. - Prcslia, Praha, 56 : 29 - 45. Europe and the a djaeent parts of North Africa and \Vest Asia contain ea. 120 sp ecies of s u bf. Sedoidene. The genus Sedum L. is especially hct.Progeneous and is composed of several natural groups whose cvaluat,ion until now has been unsatisfactory. Some groups arc closely allied to othe r recently distinguis hed gflmwa, and it is necessary to treat them as separate genera . Therefore genera A izopsis GRULTCH, Asterosedum GRUL!CH, P etrosedum GrmLLCH and Oreosedum GRULICH arc- rl escribed. Regional Museum, 69215 i\1ikulov, Czechoslovakia The taxonomic classification of succulents is difficult, because the varia bility of most species is fairly large and the phenomenon of succulence often conditions convergencies. Several species (including many cultivars) are used in horticulture, which tends to co mplicate their taxonomy. All species of the family Orassulaceae are of succulent habit. The generic division of this family is most unclear, sinee extreme types have been classed as monotypic genera, e.g. Pagella ScHONL. Further taxa are natural, e.g. subf. Sempervivoideae, Hylotelephium 0HBA, Umbilicus DC. Many species, however, remain in two polymorphic genera Crassula L. and Sedum L. , each with numerous species, and whose differentiation from the other genera is not clear. Most of the "intermediate" types create difficulties, especially when using classic morphological methods based on their succulent parts.