Change at Altrincham
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Manchester Metrolink Tram System
Feature New Promise of LRT Systems Manchester Metrolink Tram System William Tyson Introduction to Greater city that could be used by local rail into the city centre either in tunnel or on Manchester services—taking them into the central the street. area—to complete closure and I carried out an appraisal of these options The City of Manchester (pop. 500,000) is replacement of the services by buses. Two and showed that closure of the lines had at the heart of the Greater Manchester options were to convert some heavy rail a negative benefit-to-cost ratio, and that— conurbation comprised of 10 lines to light rail (tram) and extend them at the very least—they should be kept municipalities that is home to 2.5 million people. The municipalities appoint a Passenger Transport Authority (PTA) for the Figure 1 Metrolink Future Network whole area to set policies and the Greater 1 Victoria Manchester Passenger Transport Executive 2 Shudehill 3 Market Street Rochdale Town Centre 4 Mosley Street (GMPTE) to implement them. Buses Newbold Manchester 5 Piccadilly Gardens Drake Street Piccadilly Kingsway Business Park 6 Rochdale provide most public transport. They are 7 St Peter's Square Railway Milnrow Station deregulated and can compete with each 8 G-Max (for Castlefield) Newhey London 9 Cornbrook other and with other modes. There is a 0 Pomona Bury - Exchange Quay local rail network serving Manchester, and = Salford Quays Buckley Wells ~ Anchorage ! Harbour City linking it with the surrounding areas and @ Broadway Shaw and Crompton # Langworthy also other regions of the country. Street $ Tradfford Bar trams vanished from Greater Manchester % Old Trafford Radcliffe ^ Wharfside* & Manchester United* in 1951, but returned in a very different * Imperial War Museum for the North* ( Lowry Centre form in 1992. -
Append. 2 for 2040 Transport Delivery Plan
Rochdale Summary GMTS2040 Implementation Plan 15.10.20 1. Introduction This Implementation Plan sets out how we will work towards our priorities including economic growth, improving the environment and social inclusion by building on Rochdale’s planned and current transport projects, many of which are set out in the Greater Manchester Transport Strategy 2040 5-Year Delivery Plan (2020-2025). While the 5-year Delivery Plan tends to consider large, medium and long-term transport schemes, this Implementation Plan is mainly focussed on local, neighbourhood level priorities and interventions to 2025. A summary of strategic schemes within the 5-Year Delivery Plan are included on Map 1. Rochdale Council in its Corporate Plan 2019-2022 “Prosperous People and Places” outlines a vision of “Making our Borough a great place to grow up, get on and live well”. It places an emphasis on prosperity for people who are healthy, safe, happy and available to participate fully in life, in places that grow and change to provide strong local economies providing opportunities and enhance quality of life. Indicators of success in achieving this are: Accessible quality highways and transport options including cycling and walking; Air and land, free from pollution and infrastructure that protects against climate change by using natural and renewable resources; More people are physically active including the over 50’s; People have access to good or outstanding places of learning; Reduced crime and anti-social behaviour. To strive for this prosperity the Council -
SPD5.16 – Dunham Woodhouses Conservation Area Appraisal
Dunham Woodhouses Conservation Area Supplementary Planning Document SPD5.16 Conservation Area Appraisal – October 2016 Dunham Woodhouses Conservation Area – Supplementary www.trafford.gov.uk Planning Document Dunham Woodhouses Conservation Area Conservation Area Appraisal October 2016 Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Designation of the Dunham Woodhouses Conservation Area ............................................... 1 1.2. Definition of a Conservation Area ........................................................................................... 1 1.3. Value of a Conservation Area Appraisal .................................................................................. 3 1.4. Scope of the Appraisal............................................................................................................. 4 2. PLANNING POLICY CONTEXT .................................................................................................. 5 2.1. National and Local Planning Policies ....................................................................................... 5 2.2. Conservation Area Policy Guidelines ...................................................................................... 6 2.3. Control Measures Brought About By Designation .................................................................. 7 3. The Summary of Special Interest .......................................................................................... -
Analysis of Capitalised Expenditure
Analysis of Capitalised Expenditure Main contractor Total Capital spend per accounts 373,677,000 Analysed as: Construction projects 163,740,848 Non-construction assets 207,109,092 Spend < £100,000 2,827,060 373,677,000 Project Type Start Completion New Build Fit-out Construction Projects Refurbishment Date Date Bus Stations and related Schemes Bolton Moor Lane Bus Station Toilets x Mitie Property Services May 2007 July 2007 Shudehill Interchange x Costain plc Nov 2003 Nov 2005 Middleton Bus Station x Wrenco (Contractors) Ltd May 2007 Oct 2007 Oldham West St Bus Station x Thomas Barnes & Sons Plc Aug 2005 Aug 2006 Bolton Interchange x Lowbury Construction Ltd Jan 2005 Mar 2006 Bolton Interchange - Overbridge x C Spencer Ltd (Barrow-upon-Humber) Mar 2005 Sept 2005 Bury Interchange: Toilets x Allenbuild Ltd Jan 2011 May 2011 Rochdale Hydro Electric Power x Spaans Babcock Nov 2010 Aug 2011 Metrolink Metrolink: Track Renewal - Altrincham / Bury Lines Carillion Metrolink: System Renewals Stagecoach Metrolink Metrolink: Withins Lane Bridge-Renewals Carillion Metrolink: Besses O'th Barn-Waterproofing Carillion Metrolink: Navigation Rd Park & Ride facility Balfour Beatty Metrolink: Altrincham Overhead Line Replacement Stagecoach Metrolink Metrolink: Stop Improvements & Platform Upgrades Galliford Try Metrolink: City Centre Track Renewals Stagecoach Metrolink Metrolink: Piccadilly Gardens Stop Improvements Balfour Beatty Metrolink: Mosley St/St Peter's Sq Stops Improvements Balfour Beatty Metrolink: Piccadilly Undercroft Stop Improvements Stagecoach -
Newsletter 2019
DUNHAM MASSEY PARISH COUNCIL Newsletter No. 45 March 2019 www.traffordparishes.gov.uk Contents MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT ................... 5 CLUBS AND SOCIETY CONTACTS ....... 6 Introduction .......................................... 7 Elections ............................................... 8 Council Meetings .................................. 9 Community Grants ................................ 9 Planning .............................................. 10 Highway Issues ................................... 10 DUNHAM WATCH ................................ 10 DUNHAM LIFE ..................................... 11 DUNHAM LOST AND FOUND .............. 11 DUNHAM THESPIANS ......................... 12 WOMEN’S INSTITUTE ......................... 13 ROSE QUEEN ...................................... 15 The Vine Inn Golf Society VIGS ......... 16 NEWS FROM THE NATIONAL TRUST . 18 Page 2 of 24 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE ANNUAL ASSEMBLY OF THE PARISH COUNCIL WILL BE HELD IN THE VILLAGE HALL AT 8PM - TUESDAY 9TH APRIL 2019 For the transaction of the following business: 1. To receive observations from Trafford Council. 2. To consider resolutions of which written notice has been given. 3. To receive a presentation: “The Dunham Estate Future Project” by Kathryn Heaton (National Trust Project Manager) 4. To deal with any other business raised by a local government elector for this Parish. All welcome. Kate Burke, Chairman, Dunham Massey Parish Council Page 3 of 24 DUNHAM MASSEY PARISH COUNCIL Chair Vice Chair Kate Burke Richard Abbott [email protected] -
Peak Period (07:30-09:30)
ASSOCIATION OF GREATER MANCHESTER AUTHORITIES GREATER MANCHESTER TRANSPORTATION UNIT PUBLIC TRANSPORT STATISTICS GREATER MANCHESTER 2009 SUMMARY This report presents results of GMTU’s public transport monitoring during 2009, including trends in countywide rail and Metrolink patronage. It forms part of the forthcoming full Report 1580 ‘Transport Statistics Greater Manchester 2009’. Each section of the full report is being published on the website www.gmtu.gov.uk as it is completed. The paragraph numbering in this report reflects that of the full document Bus service provision is not included in this year’s report as the information is currently being updated by GMPTE. GMTU Report 1580 E Ellis, A Collins, A Castle August 2010 Version Purpose/ Changes Author Date Date Issued To Whom No. Changed 1 First Release E Ellis et al 22/08/2010 23/10/20 www.gmtu.gov.uk All enquiries to: Greater Manchester Transportation Unit 3rd Floor Heron House 47 Lloyd St Manchester M2 5LE Telephone: 0161 455 2061 Internal Tel: 815 2062 Fax: 0161 455 2071 e-mail: [email protected] website: http://www.gmtu.gov.uk/ The Greater Manchester Transportation Unit provides a strategic and local transportation service to and on behalf of the ten district councils of Greater Manchester. The unit is funded by the ten districts and attached to Manchester City Council as lead authority. GMTU Report 1580 Contents C O N T E N T S Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................1 5 PUBLIC TRANSPORT.........................................................................................3 -
Greater Manchester Transport Fund Update and Capital Programme Monitoring Report
15. Greater Manchester Combined Authority Report for Resolution DATE: 29 July 2011 SUBJECT: Greater Manchester Transport Fund Update and Capital Programme Monitoring Report REPORT OF: Chief Executive, Transport for Greater Manchester PURPOSE OF REPORT To present an update in relation to the Greater Manchester Transport Fund (GMTF) and other TfGM Capital Schemes. RECOMMENDATIONS Members of the Combined Authority are requested to: 1. note the contents of the report; 2. approve the proposal in relation to the Queens Road Stop on the Bury line, as detailed in section 5 of the report, which include up to £1.75 million of prudential borrowings that will be repaid from incremental net revenues generated from opening the new stop at Queens Road; 3. approve the proposals in relation to the delivery of the Park and Ride package within the Greater Manchester Transport Fund, as set out in section 4.38 of the report, which include up to £15.5 million of prudential borrowings, which were included in the Treasury Management Strategy Statement & Borrowing Limits and Annual Investment Strategy 2011- 12 approved by the Combined Authority on 1 April 2011. GMCA Report Capital Programme v1 1 21/07/2011 18:53 15. BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS Report to Greater Manchester Combined Authority: ‘Integration of Metrolink Airport extension and SEMMMS Road Scheme’-27 May 2011. Report to Greater Manchester Combined Authority: ‘Capital Programme 2011/12 to 2013/14’-1 April 2011. Report to Greater Manchester Combined Authority: ‘Treasury Management Strategy Statement & Borrowing Limits and Annual Investment Strategy 2011- 12’ Report to AGMA Executive Board: ‘Greater Manchester Transport Fund-Metrolink Phase 3B Delivery Programme and Financial Strategy Update’-30 July 2010. -
Mosley Street Metrolink Station Closure Assessment Revised Final
Mosley Street Metrolink Station Closure Assessment Revised Final Report for GMPTE November 2009 DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET BPP 04 F8 Client: GMPTE Mosley Street Metrolink Station Project: Job No: B09310C0 Closure Assessment Document Title: Final Report Originator Checked by Reviewed by Approved by Draft NAME NAME NAME NAME G Smith DATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE August 2009 Document Status: Working Draft Revised Draft NAME NAME NAME NAME G Smith Mike Lampkin Mike Lampkin Ian Whiteley DATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE August 2009 Document Status: Draft Final Report Revised Final NAME NAME NAME NAME G Smith M Lampkin M Lampkin S Kenny DATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE November 2009 Document Status: Revised Final Report NAME NAME NAME NAME DATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE Document Status: This document has been prepared by Jacobs Consultancy UK Ltd, a subsidiary of Jacobs Engineering U.K. Limited (“Jacobs”) in its professional capacity as consultants in accordance with the terms and conditions of Jacobs’ contract with the commissioning party (the “Client”). Regard should be had to those terms and conditions when considering and/or placing any reliance on this document. No part of this document may be copied or reproduced by any means without prior written permission from Jacobs. If you have received this document in error, please destroy all copies in your possession or control and notify Jacobs. Any advice, opinions, or recommendations within this document (a) should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a whole; (b) do not, in any way, purport to include any manner of legal advice or opinion; (c) are based upon the information made available to Jacobs at the date of this document and on current UK standards, codes, technology and construction practices as at the date of this document. -
Dunham Town Conservation Area – Supplementary Planning Document
Dunham Town Conservation Area – Supplementary Planning Document SPD5.15 Conservation Area Appraisal – October 2016 Dunham Town Conservation Area – Supplementary Planning www.trafford.gov.uk Document Dunham Town Conservation Area Conservation Area Appraisal October 2016 Dunham Town Conservation Area Conservation Area Appraisal October 2016 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Designation of the Dunham Town Conservation Area ........................................................... 1 1.2. Definition of a Conservation Area ........................................................................................... 1 1.3. Value of a Conservation Area Appraisal .................................................................................. 3 1.4. Scope of the Appraisal............................................................................................................. 4 2. PLANNING POLICY CONTEXT .................................................................................................. 5 2.1. National and Local Planning Policies ....................................................................................... 5 2.2. Conservation Area Policy Guidelines ...................................................................................... 6 2.3. Control Measures Brought About By Designation .................................................................. 7 3. THE SUMMARY OF SPECIAL INTEREST ................................................................................... -
Metrolink Performance Network Summary Keolisamey Metrolink Aim to Deliver a Reliable Service to Our Customers
Metrolink Performance Network Summary KeolisAmey Metrolink aim to deliver a reliable service to our customers. We want to share with you how we are performing. This report covers ourthe four-week period between: 14 October until 10 November 2018 Punctuality Reliability Percentage of trams departing less than two minutes late. Percentage of planned miles operated. 90.5% 99.7% 100%100 100%100 95%95 95%95 90%90 90%90 85%85 85%85 80%80 80%80 90.6% 89.3% 90.8% 91.4% 90.4% 90.5% 99.5% 98.9% 99.3% 99.6% 99.6% 99.7% 75% 75% 75 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 75 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 (18/19) (18/19) (18/19) (18/19) (18/19) (18/19) (18/19) (18/19) (18/19) (18/19) (18/19) (18/19) Airport 89.5% Airport 99.6% Route punctuality by date Altrincham 95.2% Altrincham 99.6% Ashton 91.7% Ashton 99.6% Bury 88.8% Bury 99.8% East Didsbury 93.4% East Didsbury 99.8% Eccles 86.6% Eccles 99.6% Oldham & Rochdale 88.6% Oldham & Rochdale 99.8% 75%75 80%80 85%85 90%90 95%95 100%100 75%75 80%80 85%85 90%90 95%95 100%100 Cancellations Short journeys Journeys cancelled. Incomplete journeys. 0.16% of all planned journeys. 0.40% of all planned journeys. How we performed What we are doing to improve We further improved our reliability performance across the network to an outstanding 99.7% for the In the run up to Christmas, we will be operating with enhanced capacity on Sundays to cater to the period. -
2.1. Apendix 1. Heritage Topic Paper
Appendix 1 Greater Manchester Spatial Framework Heritage Topic Paper Revision A Prepared on behalf of: Greater Manchester Combined Authority September 2019 7 BDP. Revision A Date September 2019 Project Reference 3000631 Prepared by AM/CN Checked by CN PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Contents. Executive Summary.............................................................................................................................................................. i Introduction. ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose of the Paper. ............................................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.2 Structure of this Paper ........................................................................................................................................... 2 A Profile of the Greater Manchester Historic Environment ..................................................................................... 3 2.1 Introduction. ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 th 2.2 Origins and Development to the Beginning of the 20 Century. ............................................................................ 3 2.3 Two Cities and Ten Metropolitan Boroughs. ......................................................................................................... -
HSL Report Template. Issue 1. Date 04/04/2002
Harpur Hill, Buxton, SK17 9JN Telephone: 01298 218000 Facsimile: 01298 218590 E Mail: [email protected] A survey of UK tram and light railway systems relating to the wheel/rail interface FE/04/14 Project Leader: E J Hollis Author(s): E J Hollis PhD CEng MIMechE Science Group: Engineering Control DISTRIBUTION HSE/HMRI: Dr D Hoddinott Customer Project Officer/HM Railway Inspectorate Mr E Gilmurray HIDS12F Research Management LIS (9) HSL: Dr N West HSL Operations Director Dr M Stewart Head of Field Engineering Section Author PRIVACY MARKING: D Available to the public HSL report approval: Dr M Stewart Date of issue: 14 March 2006 Job number: JR 32107 Registry file: FE/05/2003/21511 (Box 433) Electronic filename: Report FE-04-14.doc © Crown Copyright (2006) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To the people listed below, and their colleagues, I would like to express my thanks for all for the help given: Blackpool Borough Council Brian Vaughan Blackpool Transport Ltd Bill Gibson Croydon Tramlink Jim Snowdon Dockland Light Railway Keith Norgrove Manchester Metrolink Steve Dale Tony Dale Mark Howard Mark Terry (now with Rail Division of Mott Macdonald) Midland Metro Des Coulson Paul Morgan Fred Roberts Andy Steel (retired) National Tram Museum David Baker Geoffrey Claydon Mike Crabtree Allan Smith Nottingham Express Transit Clive Pennington South Yorkshire Supertram Ian Milne Paul Seddon Steve Willis Tyne & Wear Metro (Nexus) Jim Davidson Peter Johnson David Walker Parsons Brinkerhoff/Permanent Way Institution Joe Brown iii Manchester Metropolitan University Simon Iwnicki Julian Snow Paul Allen Transdev Edinburgh Tram Andy Wood HM Railway Inspectorate Dudley Hoddinott Dave Keay Ian Raxton iv CONTENTS 1 Introduction.............................................................................................................