DOCSLIB.ORG

Slovenia by Damjan Lajh

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Slovenia by Damjan Lajh Slovenia by Damjan Lajh Capital: Ljubljana Population: 2.0 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$26,470 Source: !e data above was provided by !e World Bank, World Development Indicators 2011. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Electoral Process 1.75 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Civil Society 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.75 1.75 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Independent Media 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 Governance* 2.25 2.25 2.00 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a National Democratic 2.00 Governance n/a n/a n/a 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Local Democratic 1.50 Governance n/a n/a n/a 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Judicial Framework 1.75 and Independence 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.75 1.75 Corruption 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.50 2.50 2.50 Democracy Score 1.83 1.79 1.75 1.68 1.75 1.82 1.86 1.93 1.93 1.93 * Starting with the 2005 edition, Freedom House introduced separate analysis and ratings for national democratic governance and local democratic governance to provide readers with more detailed and nuanced analysis of these two important subjects. NOTE: !e ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. !e opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s). !e ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest. !e Democracy Score is an average of ratings for the categories tracked in a given year. 524 Nations in Transit 2011 E S lovenia underwent many parallel transformations in the period from the end of the 1980s to the start of the 1990s, including changing its economic and political system and establishing itself as an internationally recognized Sstate. Having proclaimed its independence on June 25, 1991, Slovenia joined the United Nations in 1992, the Council of Europe in 1993, and the European Union (EU) and NATO in 2004. On January 1, 2007, the Slovenian currency, the tolar, was replaced by the euro, and at the end of December 2007 Slovenia entered the Schengen zone. In 2008 Slovenia passed another maturity test on the European stage by holding the Presidency to the Council of the European Union from January to July of that year as the first of the 12 new EU member states to do so. In July 2010 Slovenia became a full member of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). National Democratic Governance. As Slovenia’s economy continued to struggle against sharply rising unemployment, the government coalition faced internal conflicts and instability. !e Minister of Environment and Minister of Economy resigned, while the Democratic Party of Retired Persons of Slovenia, part of the coalition government, was strongly dissatisfied with the pension reform proposal. Two interpellations were raised against the Minister of Interior Affairs and Minister of Education and Sport. Dissatisfaction with government-proposed measures drew demonstrations from employees in the public sector and students. Slovenia’s rating for national democratic governance remains unchanged at 2.00. Electoral Process. Local elections were held in Slovenia in 208 out of 210 municipalities on October 10, 2010 (and a second round in the mayoral elections on October 24). Due to a decision by the Constitutional Court, elections were not held in the municipalities of Koper and Trebnje, where new municipalities needed to be split off based on the results of a 2009 referendum. Independent candidates were the absolute winners in the mayoral elections, of whom 70 were elected, while in the municipal council elections the best results were achieved by the oppositional Slovenian Democratic Party. !e local elections were marked by low turnout (50.28 percent in the first round and 48.81 percent in the second round), a large share of reelected mayors, extremely low share of elected women candidates, and the first elected black mayor in Eastern Europe. Slovenia’s electoral process rating remains unchanged at 1.50. Civil Society. In 2010, controversy continued over the adoption of the Family Law Act, including a provision to allow same-sex couples to adopt, which was still at Slovenia 525 the level of debate in parliamentary committee. Another years-old controversy was resolved when a bill was passed on the status of the “erased,” the thousands of non- Slovene Yugoslavs remaining in the country when it achieved independence who didn’t file for Slovenian citizenship in time. With the new act on the so-called erased persons, the government allows these individuals to submit applications to obtain a permit for permanent residence in Slovenia. !e government was also the focus of opposition from many civil society groups, primarily dissatisfied trade unions and students who opposed the Mini Job Act, which aims to regulate special forms of employment like student jobs and temp work. Slovenia’s civil society rating remains unchanged at 2.00. Independent Media. !ere were several threats against journalists during the year, including a death threat by the son of the mayor of Ljubljana against a newspaper journalist. On October 20, the National Assembly adopted the new Act on Radio-Television Slovenia, but days later 32 deputies requested a legislative referendum, which was held December 12. Critics opposed the act because it would change Radio-Television Slovenia (RTVSLO) from a state to a public broadcaster, decouple RTVSLO employee pay from government worker pay, and require programming for minorities from the other former Yugoslav republics. Only 14.8 percent of voters participated in the referendum on the act, which was voted down by a margin of 44.6 percent. Slovenia’s independent media rating remains unchanged at 2.25. Local Democratic Governance. In 2010, the controversial issue of establishing provinces in Slovenia was left on the back burner as in previous years. At the beginning of November, the government prepared legislation promoting balanced regional development and submitted it to the National Assembly for adoption. During the year there were controversial debates over Ljubljana mayor Zoran Janković. While some argued that during Janković’s mandate the Slovenian capital had finally started to develop properly, others talked about the “Berlusconization” of Ljubljana and high local-budget debt. Despite all the critics, Janković convincingly won a new mayoral mandate. Slovenia’s rating for local democratic governance remains unchanged at 1.50. Judicial Framework and Independence. In Slovenia, the judicial system remains overburdened with long trial delays. In 2010, the opposition was very critical of the work of Minister of Justice Aleš Zalar, threatening interpellation for his nomination of Branko Masleša as the new President of the Supreme Court. On the basis of journalistic reports, public questions were raised as to whether Supreme State Prosecutor Barbara Brezigar had ordered internal control over the work of State Prosecutor Branka Zobec Hrastar, who was directing the pre-trial proceedings in the controversial corruption case against the Finnish company Patria. !is case included an indictment against Brezigar’s ally, former Prime Minister Janez Janša. Slovenia’s judicial framework and independence rating remains unchanged at 1.75. 526 Nations in Transit 2011 Corruption. In August 2010, in the so-called Patria affair, an indictment was filed against five persons, including president of the Slovenian Democratic Party (and former Prime Minister) Janez Janša. Other corruption cases during the year were directly or indirectly linked to the construction sector. A deputy of the National Assembly was sentenced to imprisonment due to corruption and other criminal acts. Investigators also detained a District Attorney who was suspected of taking a bribe. At the end of May 2010, the Act on Integrity in the Public Sector was adopted to stimulate fair and transparent behavior among civil servants and good practices in decision-making processes. Slovenia’s corruption rating remains unchanged at 2.50. Outlook for 2011. Slovenia will continue to face pressure to resolve the financial and economic crisis causing the country’s increasing rate of unemployment and lagging wages. !e government coalition will continue working to resolve internal political conflicts and instability. Although the National Assembly at the end of 2010 passed pension reform legislation, this issue will also be high on the Slovenian political agenda in 2011. Controversial debates on adopting the proposed Family Law Bill will likewise continue. Nongovernmental actors have predicted initiatives to call referendums in 2011, especially concerning the adoption of the pension reform and Mini Job Act. Slovenia 527 M R National Democratic Governance 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 n/a n/a n/a 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 !e constitution defines Slovenia as a democratic republic based on the rule of law. !e separation of powers is provided through checks and balances among the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. !e country’s system of government has achieved stability without coercion, violence, or other abuse of basic rights and civil liberties. Citizens may participate in decision-making processes, and referendums have become a stable feature in Slovenian politics, although some experts argue they are frequently used in an undemocratic and illegitimate manner.1 !e Slovenian parliament consists of the National Assembly and National Council.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Slovenia Before the Elections
    PERSPECTIVE Realignment of the party system – Slovenia before the elections ALEŠ MAVER AND UROŠ URBAS November 2011 The coalition government under Social Democrat Prime make people redundant. Nevertheless, the unemploy- Minister Borut Pahor lost the support it needed in Parlia- ment rate increased by 75 per cent to 107,000 over three ment and early elections had to be called for 4 Decem- years. This policy was financed by loans of 8 billion eu- ber, one year before completing its term of office. What ros, which doubled the public deficit. are the reasons for this development? Which parties are now seeking votes in the »political marketplace«? What However, Prime Minister Pahor overestimated his popu- coalitions are possible after 4 December? And what chal- larity in a situation in which everybody hoped that the lenges will the new government face? economic crisis would soon be over. The governing par- ties had completely different priorities: they were seek- ing economic rents; they could not resist the pressure of Why did the government of lobbies and made concessions; and they were too preoc- Prime Minister Borut Pahor fail? cupied with scandals and other affairs emerging from the ranks of the governing coalition. Although the governing coalition was homogeneously left-wing, it could not work together and registered no significant achievements. The next government will thus Electoral history and development be compelled to achieve something. Due to the deterio- of the party system rating economic situation – for 2012 1 per cent GDP growth, 1.3 per cent inflation, 8.4 per cent unemploy- Since the re-introduction of the multi-party system Slo- ment and a 5.3 per cent budget deficit are predicted – venia has held general elections in 1990, 1992, 1996, the goals will be economic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Democratic Changes in Poland Upon the Political
    p O3l 2S /ka 6 . $akademia $ . $ ' ( 0 , $U m80,(-ĉ712ĝ&, i e j ę tno ś C i TO720m XXX ;;9, STU678',$dia śRO ĝ52'.2:2(8523(-6.,(dkOWOeUROpejSkie i B a, Ł%$à.$1,67<&=1(kaNiSTYCZNe 2021 dO'2,;66%i 10.4467/2543733XSSB.21.011.13804 %$5%$5$.5$8=02=(5Redžep ŠkRijelj State8QLZHUV\WHW-DJLHOORĔVNL University Novi pazar THE72ĩ6$02ĝû± IMPACT OF DEMOCRA&=<72TI7</.2C CHANGES680$ I6327.$ēN POLAND UPON THE POLITI,232:,(ĝ&,"CAL TRANSFORMATION AND BREAKUP OF THE SOCIALIST FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA 7RĪVDPRĞüXIRUPRZDQDMHVWZDUXQNLHPRWZDUFLDVLĊQDĞZLDW1 -5DW]LQJHU Summary 6áRZDNOXF]RZHIRUP\WRĪVDPRĞFLWRĪVDPRĞüXIRUPRZDQDWRĪVDPRĞüMHGQRVWNRZDWRĪVD PRĞü]ELRURZDG\VNXVMHRThe fall of the deeply rootedWRĪVDPRĞFL communism in the countries of the eastern Bloc in the 1980s has differed according to the level of achieved rights and freedoms, especially in poland, as it was finalized7RĪVDPRĞü" with the breakup±DFyĪWR]DRVREOLZRĞü"&RXNU\ZDVLĊ]DW\PVáRZHPEĊGąF\POHN of the Soviet Union. The changes announced with the foundation of “Solidarity”V\NDOQą]DJDGNąNWyUHX]QDOLĞP\]DWDNXĪ\WHF]QHĪHMHVWHĞP\VNáRQQLSRVáXJLZDüVLĊ – the first independent syndicate – which spread to the factories and enterprises across polandQLPEH]UHÀHNV\MQLHX]QDZDü]DQLH]EĊGQHPLPRĪHÄQLHMDVQH´WUXGQHGRGHV\JQRZDQLD beginning in the lenin Shipyard. The staunch national pride and freedoms, empowered withZ\P\NDMąFHVLĊ]Z\Ná\PPHWRGRPREVHUZDFMLL the strength of the Catholic Church effectively eliminatedSRPLDUX-HVWÄZV]HFKREHFQH´ÄPJOLVWH´ the weak Soviet-imposed com- munism.LQLHGRRNUHĞORQHD The foundationMHGQDNSU]\GDWQH of the first independent and free polish syndicate in the strong Soviet Bloc catalyzed&KĊWQLHSRVWU]HJDVLĊÄWRĪVDPRĞü´MDNRQD]ZĊZáDĞFLZRĞFLNWyUąPRĪQD]DFKRZDü the initiation of abrupt and serious reforms in the countries of the eastern Bloc. The fall of the Berlin Wall intensified the initiated processes of reintegration and independence DWR]NROHLURG]LZQDVSU]HNRQDQLHĪHPRĪQDMąUyZQLHĪVWUDFLüVWDZDüZMHMREURQLH from external political torture and poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • General Election in Slovenia
    GENERAL ELECTIONS IN SLOVENIA 4th December 2011 European Elections monitor The Rightwing Opposition Forces forecast to win in the Slovenian General Elections on from Corinne Deloy translated by Helen Levy 4th December next. ANALYSIS On 4th December next Slovenia will be holding the first early general elections in its history. 1 month before This election follows parliament’s rejection on 20th September last of the confidence motion the poll presented by Borut Pahor’s government (Social Democratic Party, SD). 51 MPs of the Demo- cratic Party (SDS), the People’s Party (SLS), the Slovenian National Party (SNS), Zares (Z) and of the Democratic Pensioners’ Party (DeSUS) voted against the text, 36 members of the Social Democratic Party and of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDS) as well as three independent MPs voted in support. The Slovenian Parliament was dissolved on 21st October. Borut Pahor is the third Slovenian head of government to fall after Alojz Peterle (Slovenian Christian-Democrats) in 1992 and Janez Drnovsek (LDS) in 2000. After the announcement of the government’s collapse, President of the Republic, Danilo Türk left New York where he was attending the UN’s General Assembly to return to Ljubljana. “The vote of defiance has worsened the political crisis,” he declared, calling on all political parties to show courage rapidly in order to find solutions to the crisis in the interest of the Slovenian people. “The vote of defiance is good news because it will lead to a new government that will have wider public support, which is vital if the necessary decisions are to be taken,” declared Janez Sustarsic, professor at the Faculty of Management in Koper.
    [Show full text]
  • Hans-Gert Pöttering: José Manuel Barroso: EU and Russia
    politicsenvironment 10 culturebusinesssports 2008 Hans-Gert Pöttering: Slovenia makes history in the EU - first Slavic country in the driving seat José Manuel Barroso: I consider that this Presidency has been for Slovenia a highlight in the impressive list of achievements EU and Russia Agree to launch key partnership talks ISSN 1854-0805 QUotESoftHEfortnight Janez Janša /Slovene PM/: We have achieved moves towards a better Europe with synergy Brussels, 24 June - With synergy with the European Commission and the European Parliament, we have in the past six months achieved moves which have made Europe better. These moves prove that Europe is dynamic, that it works and that it is capable of facing difficulties. It was possible to take these steps forward because of good collaboration and synergy between institutions. “Si.nergy for Europe” is the motto that Slovenia chose as a guideline for its first Presidency of the EU. Graham Watson /Leader of European liberals (ALDE)/: Slovenia made a mark Brussels, 24 June: “I congratulate the Slovenian Presidency on its achievements. If some had a feeling that it was just a warm-up be- fore the Presidency of the next state, those of us who looked closer saw important progress. Slovenia made a mark. As the most impor- tant achievement, I would point out the ratification of the directive on the return of illegal residents, which is the first cornerstone of EU immigration policy. As one of the successes, I would emphasise especially the fifth freedom, the directive on environment protection under criminal law, and postal services, and progress on the West- ern Balkans.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook Indiveu – Party Preferences
    Codebook InDivEU – party preferences European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies December 2020 Introduction The “InDivEU – party preferences” dataset provides data on the positions of more than 400 parties from 28 countries1 on questions of (differentiated) European integration. The dataset comprises a selection of party positions taken from two existing datasets: (1) The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File contains party positions for three rounds of European Parliament elections (2009, 2014, and 2019). Party positions were determined in an iterative process of party self-placement and expert judgement. For more information: https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/65944 (2) The Chapel Hill Expert Survey The Chapel Hill Expert Survey contains party positions for the national elections most closely corresponding the European Parliament elections of 2009, 2014, 2019. Party positions were determined by expert judgement. For more information: https://www.chesdata.eu/ Three additional party positions, related to DI-specific questions, are included in the dataset. These positions were determined by experts involved in the 2019 edition of euandi after the elections took place. The inclusion of party positions in the “InDivEU – party preferences” is limited to the following issues: - General questions about the EU - Questions about EU policy - Questions about differentiated integration - Questions about party ideology 1 This includes all 27 member states of the European Union in 2020, plus the United Kingdom. How to Cite When using the ‘InDivEU – Party Preferences’ dataset, please cite all of the following three articles: 1. Reiljan, Andres, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, Lorenzo Cicchi, Diego Garzia, Alexander H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Far Right in Slovenia
    MASARYK UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF SOCIAL STUDIES DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE The Far Right in Slovenia Master‟s thesis Bc. Lucie Chládková Supervisor: doc. JUDr. PhDr. Miroslav Mareš, Ph.D. UČO: 333105 Field of Study: Security and Strategic Studies Matriculation Year: 2012 Brno 2014 Declaration of authorship of the thesis Hereby I confirm that this master‟s thesis “The Far Right in Slovenia” is an outcome of my own elaboration and work and I used only sources here mentioned. Brno, 10 May 2014 ……………………………………… Lucie Chládková 2 Acknowledgments I would like to express my gratitude to doc. JUDr. PhDr. Miroslav Mareš, Ph.D., who supervised this thesis and contributed with a lot of valuable remarks and advice. I would like to also thank to all respondents from interviews for their help and information they shared with me. 3 Annotation This master‟s thesis deals with the far right in Slovenia after 1991 until today. The main aim of this case study is the description and analysis of far-right political parties, informal and formal organisations and subcultures. Special emphasis is put on the organisational structure of the far-right scene and on the ideological affiliation of individual far-right organisations. Keywords far right, Slovenia, political party, organisation, ideology, nationalism, extremism, Blood and Honour, patriotic, neo-Nazi, populism. 4 Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 7 2. Methodology .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Between Populism and Socialism: Slovenia’S Left Party Alen Toplišek
    This is an Accepted Manuscript of a book chapter published by Routledge in The Populist Radical Left in Europe on 14 March 2019, available online: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315180823-4 Between populism and socialism: Slovenia’s Left party Alen Toplišek Abstract This chapter offers the first in-depth study of both structural and agential factors behind the emergence and electoral breakthrough of a new radical left party in Slovenia, the Left. It defines the party’s ideological profile and it analyses its tactics of party competition through a selection of concrete examples. It concludes by outlining two possible trajectories for the future electoral and organisational development of the party. Introduction The Left (Levica) is a relative newcomer in the Slovenian party system and the European Populist Radical Left (PRL) party family more widely. Formally established in March 2014 as a coalition party under the name of the United Left, it managed to surpass the 4% electoral threshold in the July 2014 parliamentary elections with 5.97% of the popular vote. The electoral result translated into six seats in a 90-member National Assembly, putting the new party on a par with the traditional party on the Slovenian Left, the Social Democrats, which was their worst electoral result since Slovenia’s independence in 1991. The novelty of the United Left was notable not only in terms of its electoral breakthrough in July 2014, but also regarding its founding organisational structure and its organic ties with new left social movements. The United Left was a coalition of three smaller parties and the ‘fourth bloc,’ which represented social movements and individuals: (1) Initiative for Democratic Socialism (IDS); (2) Democratic Labour Party (DSD); (3) the Party for the Sustainable Development of Slovenia (TRS); and (4) civil society movements and individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Slovenian Democratic Path After European Union Accession
    The Difficult Look Back: Slovenian Democratic Path after European Union Accession MIRO HAČEK Politics in Central Europe (ISSN: 1801-3422) Vol. 15, No. 3 DOI: 10.2478/pce-2019-0023 Abstract: In the third wave of democratic changes in the early 1990s when the Central and Eastern European (CEE) political landscape changed radically and the democrati‑ sation processes started in the eastern part of the continent, Slovenia was one of the most prominent countries with the best prospects for rapid democratic growth. Slove‑ nia somewhat luckily escaped the Yugoslav civil wars and towards the end of the 20th century was already on the path towards a stable and consolidated democracy with the most successful economy in the entire CEE area. After the dissolution of Yugoslavia, Slovenia had a simple and straight ‑forward political goals, i.e. to join the European union as soon as possible, thus consolidating its place among the most developed countries within the region. After some setbacks, this goal was accomplished in (so far) the biggest enlargement to the Union in May 2004. But what happened after Slovenia managed to successfully achieve its pair of major political goals? In this chapter, we search for an answer to this question and find out why Slovenian voters are increas‑ ingly distrustful not only of political institutions, but why so ‑called new political faces and instant political parties are so successful and why Slovenian democracy has lost a leading place among consolidated democracies in CEE. Keywords: Slovenia; European Union; membership; distrust; democracy. Introduction After declaring its independence from former Yugoslavia in 1991, the Republic of Slovenia expressed its willingness and objective, both in its strategic develop‑ ment documents and at the highest political levels, to become a full member of POLITICS IN CENTRAL EUROPE 15 (2019) 3 419 the European Union (EU).1 As the crucial developmental documents2 indicate, the optimum long ‑term development of the Slovenian economy is inextricably tied to Slovenia’s full membership in the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Populism Report Slovenia
    2018 POPULISM REPORT SPECIAL EDITION: SLOVENIA Tamás BOROS Botond BőTöS Published by: fEPS – foundation for European Progressive Studies Rue Montoyer 40, 4th fl oor – 1000 Brussels, Belgium T: +32 2 234 69 00 Email: [email protected] Website: www.feps-europe.eu Policy Solutions Revay utca, 10 – 1065 Budapest, Hungary T: +36 1 4 748 748 Email: [email protected] Website: www.policysolutions.eu Copyright: FEPS and Policy Solutions, October 2018 Responsible editors: Ernst STETTER, FEPS Secretary General Tamás BOROS, Co-Director of Policy Solutions Maria FREITAS, FEPS Policy Advisor Authors: Tamás BOROS, Botond BőTöS Proofreader and consultant: Gábor GYőRI This study does not represent the collective views of FEPS and Policy Solutions. The responsibility of FEPS and Policy Solutions is limited to approving its publication as worthy of consideration of the European progressive movement. With the fi nancial support of the European Parliament. This report does not represent the European Parliament’s views but only of the respective authors. IN THE STRANGLEHOLD OF POPULISM: SLOVENIA In many respects, the Slovenian parliamentary elections of June 2018 followed a different trajectory than the election results of the neighbouring countries in Central and Southern Europe. In Italy, Austria, Hungary and Croatia, rightwing populist forces gained power, and the public mood in these countries shifted visibly to the right. At first glance, it appears that Slovenian domestic politics did not succumb to the populist climate that prevails in the southern and eastern segments of the European Union. The domestic political landscape remained unchanged: similarly to the election results seen over the past decades, the votes cast were distributed between the right and left at a ratio of 40-60, respectively, while voter turnout (51%) declined.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Ombudsman
    ISSN 1318–9255 Human Rights Ombudsman – Slovenia Seventeenth Regular Annual Report of the Human Rights Ombudsman of the Republic of Slovenia for the Year 2011 Abbreviated Version Human Rights Ombudsman of the Republic of Slovenia Dunajska cesta 56, 1109 Ljubljana Annual Report 2011 Slovenia Telephone: + 386 1 475 00 50 Fax: + 386 1 475 00 40 E-mail: [email protected] www.varuh-rs.si Seventeenth Regular Annual Report of the Human Rights Ombudsman of the Republic of Slovenia for the Year 2011 Abbreviated Version Ljubljana, September 2012 Annual Report of the Human Rights Ombudsman for 2011 1 2 Annual Report of the Human Rights Ombudsman for 2011 NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA Dr Gregor Virant, President Šubičeva 4 1102 Ljubljana Mr President, In accordance with Article 43 of the Human Rights Ombudsman Act I am sending you the Seventeenth Regular Report referring to the work of the Human Rights Ombudsman of the Republic of Slovenia in 2011. I would like to inform you that I wish to personally present the executive summary of this Report, and my own findings, during the discussion of the Regular Annual Report at the National Assembly. Yours respectfully, Dr Zdenka Čebašek - Travnik Human Rights Ombudsman Number: 0106 - 4 / 2012 Date: 3 May 2012 Dr Zdenka Čebašek - Travnik Human Rights Ombudsman Tel.: +386 1 475 00 00 Faks: +386 1 475 00 40 E-mail: [email protected] WWW.VARUH-RS.SI Annual Report of the Human Rights Ombudsman for 2011 3 1. THE OMBUDSMAN’S FINDINGS, OPINIONS AND PROPOSALS 10 Slovenia in Brief 22 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Immigrants in Early 1980S
    UDK: 811.163.6 323.1(497.4)"1982'' Izvorni znanstveni članak Received: July 17, 2017 Accepted: June 21, 2018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22586/review.v15i1.9743 THE LANGUAGE TRIBUNAL DEBATE IN 1982: PERCEPTIONS OF SLOVENIAN LANGUAGE AND “YUGOSLAV” IMMIGRANTS IN EARLY 1980S Marko ZAJC* The article deals with a public debate on the institute of Jezikovno razsodišče (Linguistic Tribunal) after the Cankarjev dom incident that occurred on 22 March 1982. The first public pan-Yugoslavian debate about the nature of the Slovenian nationalism in 1980s mer- ged the problem with the use of the Slovenian language and that of the position of immigrants who had come to the Socialist Republic of Slovenia from other Yugoslavian republics into a dangerous blend of linguistic, cultural, economic and political disagreement. Keywords: Yugoslavism, 1980s, Slovenian language, nationalism, SFRY The context of the citizenship, language and migration in socialist Slovenia In post-1945 Yugoslavia, already the first law on citizenship established a two-tier or bifurcated citizenship. Every citizen of individual republic was si- multaneously a citizen of Yugoslavia and every citizen of Yugoslavia was in principle a citizen of individual republic. Yugoslav citizens were allowed to have only one, clearly established republican citizenship. The republic-level ci- tizenships of the constitutive republics were established on the basis of muni- cipal membership. On the other hand, every citizen of any Yugoslav republic enjoyed in every republic the same rights as the citizens of that republic.1 The- se principles were – in general – adopted also by constitutions to follow (1963, 1974).2 According to the last Yugoslav constitution (1974), every citizen auto- * Marko Zajc, Ph.
    [Show full text]
  • Repe Myths and Ideology
    1 Božo Repe Between Myths and Ideology Some Views on Slovene Contemporary Historiography With Chronological Survey of Slovene History, written by Darja Kerec 2 Between Myths and Ideology Some Views on Slovene Contemporary Historiography (With Chronological Survey of Slovene History, written by Darja Kerec) Author: Božo Repe Reviewers: dr. Dušan Ne ćak, dr. Bojan Balkovec, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Department of History © University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, 2009 All rights reserved. Published by University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts Issued by Department of History, Faculty of Arts For the publisher: Valentin Bucik, Dean of the Faculty of Arts Ljubljana 2009 First edition Objavljeno 4.12.2009 na URL naslovu: http://www.zgodovina-ff-uni- lj.net/index.php?option=com_remository&Itemid=26&func=select&id=8 Publication is free of charge. CIP - Kataložni zapis o publikaciji Narodna in univerzitetna knjižnica, Ljubljana 930.1(497.4)(0.034.2) REPE, Božo Between myths and ideology [Elektronski vir] : some views on Slovene contemporary historiography / Božo Repe ; with Chronological survey of Slovene history, written by Darja Kerec. - 1st ed. - El. knjiga. - Ljubljana : Faculty of Arts, 2009 Na čin dostopa (URL): http://www.zgodovina-ff-uni-lj.net/index.php?o ption=com_remository&Itemid=26&func=select&id=8 ISBN 978-961-237-335-1 1. Kerec, Darja 248758784 3 Table of Contents: Slovene View of the Surviving State Formations p. 4 Slovenes and Yugoslav Historiography after World War II p. 29 Mythic Notions of Slovenes p. 44 The Myth and Reality of Communism p. 61 How Much Comparativity can be Found in Slovene Historiography? p.
    [Show full text]