Hans-Gert Pöttering: José Manuel Barroso: EU and Russia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Slovenia by Damjan Lajh
Slovenia by Damjan Lajh Capital: Ljubljana Population: 2.0 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$26,470 Source: !e data above was provided by !e World Bank, World Development Indicators 2011. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Electoral Process 1.75 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Civil Society 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.75 1.75 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Independent Media 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 Governance* 2.25 2.25 2.00 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a National Democratic 2.00 Governance n/a n/a n/a 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Local Democratic 1.50 Governance n/a n/a n/a 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Judicial Framework 1.75 and Independence 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.75 1.75 Corruption 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.50 2.50 2.50 Democracy Score 1.83 1.79 1.75 1.68 1.75 1.82 1.86 1.93 1.93 1.93 * Starting with the 2005 edition, Freedom House introduced separate analysis and ratings for national democratic governance and local democratic governance to provide readers with more detailed and nuanced analysis of these two important subjects. -
Institutionalization of the Czech and Slovenian Party System
Institutionalization of the Czech and Slovenian party system Alena Klvaňová1 Abstract For the past two decades, the characteristic feature of the Czech Republic and the Republic of Slovenia’s party system has been relatively invariable and closed to fundamental change. In both cases, there has been a distortion of the change and its nature which occurred around 2010, when new political entities began to emerge on the political scene. These entities have received support from a large part of the electorate. The reason for the success of the new political parties is mainly related to the dissatisfaction of the Czech and Slovenian public with the political situation and the conviction of citizens about the widespread corruption among public officials. The success of the newly formed entities caused the decline of primarily established parties. The aim of this article is to determine the effect of these changes on the party systems, and simultaneously to answer the question, to what extent both party systems are institutionalized. The answer to this question can be obtained by measuring the extend of institutionalization of party systems based on three criteria, which are incorporation of political parties in the party system, party system stability and quality of party competition. Key words: Party system, Czech Republic, Republic of Slovenia, political party, indicators of measuring the degree of institutionalization, stability, degree of institutionalization of party system. INTRODUCTION The Czech Republic and Slovenia are Central European countries which share the same past in some respects. Both countries have experienced a totalitarian regime. After the fall of it, they had to learn to work with democratic elements. -
The Truth Journalistic Credibility Takes a Side Step the Achievements
politicsenvironment 12 culturebusinesssports 2008 The Truth about Patria, Part II Nenad Glücks, journalist of Reporter: Journalistic credibility takes a side step The achievements of the Ministries in the 2004-2008 term Primož Kozmus (gold medal in hammer throw ): Dreams fulfilled ISSN 1854-0805 QuoTesofThefortnight Peter Jambrek /The President of the Assembly/: The Assembly for the Republic Supports Current Govt Ljubljana, 3 September: We condemn the attempts to discredit the (Slove- nian) government abroad. The first such attempt was the journalists' petition against state pressure on media, while the second was the Finish documentary accusing Janša of corruption in the Patria deal. Both are ruthless attacks on the entire Slovenia, which weakened the country's international standing and damaged its reputation. It was the current government that confronted lobbies which have had mo- nopoly on various segments of society for decades: the road lobby, big corporations and media. In all of these cases, the government sided with the people, and not the magnates. Barbara Brezigar /State Prosecutor General/: No evidence on corruption from Finland Ljubljana, September 4th: We have not received any evidence from the Finnish investigators which would confirm the suspicion that any- body has committed a criminal offence in connection with the acquisition of 8x8 armoured infantry vehicles. According to the information I have, there are no longer any persons in custody. Those who were in custody have not been charged. The Slovene prosecutors cooperate with the Finnish criminal investigators all the time and we have great difficulties acquiring information. According to what has been happening since the TV story pre- sented Slovenia as a corrupt and backward country, one must say that the Slovene police and prosecutors have been working on this case for as long as the Finnish. -
Cdl-Inf(2000)013
Strasbourg, 16 October 2000 CDL-INF (2000) 13 <doc\2000\cdl-inf\Inf12-e> Or.Eng. OPINION ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS CONCERNING LEGISLATIVE ELECTIONS IN THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA adopted by the Venice Commission at its 44 th Plenary Meeting (13-14 October 2000) on the basis of the opinion of the Rapporteurs: Mr Antonio LA PERGOLA (President) Mr Pieter VAN DIJK (Member, Netherlands) Mr Sergio BARTOLE (Substitute Member, Italy) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera pas distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. 2 CDL-INF (2000) 13 By letters of 21 July and 7 September 2000, the Prime Minister of the Republic of Slovenia, Dr Andrej Bajuk, addressed to the European Commission for Democracy through Law the question whether amendments introduced to the Constitution of Slovenia concerning provisions on Parliamentary elections, by which a proportional electoral system with a threshold of 4% for access to the distribution of seats in the National Assembly is established, is compatible with European democratic traditions and standards. The request indicated in this respect that these amendments conflict with the decision of the people as expressed in a referendum and decisions of the Constitutional Court. The Commission examined the factual and legal background of the request for an opinion (see the summary of facts in Doc CDL (2000) 61 and the Prime Minister’s letter of 7 September 2000) on the basis of the report by Messrs Antonio LA PERGOLA, Pieter VAN DIJK, Sergio BARTOLE, Rapporteurs at its 44 th Plenary Meeting, 13-14 October 2000, in the presence of: Mrs Barbara BREZIGAR, Minister of Justice, Mr Jelko KACIN, Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the National Assembly, Mrs Tina BITENC PENGOV, Deputy Director and Acting Head of the Secretariat of Legislation and Legal Affairs of the National Assembly, Mr Miro CERAR, Constitutional Adviser to the National Assembly and Mr Klemen JAKLIC, Legal Councillor to the Prime Minister. -
The Miro Petek Case a Threat to Press Freedom in Slovenia
Press Freedom Slovenia - IFJ-Report 2002; The Miro Petek-Case and the Issue of Press Freedom in Slovenia Page1 International Federation of Journalists Report June 2002 The Miro Petek Case A Threat to Press Freedom in Slovenia by Alexander Sami, IFJ-Expert group-Member and Central Secretary of the Swiss Federation of Journalists SVJ-FSJ-FSG Brussels, 14th June 2002 Press Freedom Slovenia - IFJ-Report 2002; The Miro Petek-Case and the Issue of Press Freedom in Slovenia Page2 Index Introduction page 3 I. Basic Facts of Slovenia page 4 1. Country Law System and Organisation a) Constitution and Law-Regulation b) Parliamentary and electoral systems c) Civil Service and State Administration System 2. Media Landscape a) General Economic Overview b) Written Press c) Audiovisual Media d) National media policies II: The Miro Petek-Case page 13 1. Circumstances 2. Interview Summaries a) Meeting with General State Prosecutor Mrs. Zdenka Cerar and together with the Supreme State Prosecutor Mr. Mirko Vrtacnik b) Meeting with the General Director of Police Mr. Marko Pogorevc and the Director of the Criminal Investigation Sector Mr. Stjepan Kovacevic c) Meeting with the Local Police Investigators and the Local Prosecutor of Slovenj Gradec who are in charge of the Miro Petek Case d) Meeting with Minister of Interior Rado Bohinc, Miha Molan, state secretary and Peter Jeglic, chief of cabinet e) Meeting with the Parliament Investigation Comission for the Miro Petek Case f) Meeting with Councelor to the President of the Republic of Slovenia for Public Relations Mrs. Spela Furlan III. Conclusions page 21 IV. Actions done by the Slovene Association of Journalists DNS page 26 1. -
Macro Report August 23, 2004
Prepared by: Alenka Krašovec, University of Ljubljana Date: January, 2007 Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 2: Macro Report August 23, 2004 Country: Slovenia Date of Election: October 3, 2004 NOTE TO COLLABORATORS: The information provided in this report contributes to an important part of the CSES project. Your efforts in providing these data are greatly appreciated! Any supplementary documents that you can provide (e.g., electoral legislation, party manifestos, electoral commission reports, media reports) are also appreciated, and may be made available on the CSES website. Part I: Data Pertinent to the Election at which the Module was Administered 1. Report the number of portfolios (cabinet posts) held by each party in cabinet, prior to the most recent election. (If one party holds all cabinet posts, simply write "all".) Name of Political Party Number of Portfolios - Liberal Democracy of Slovenia (9); after SLS was excluded (12) - United List of Social Democrats (3) - Slovene People’s Party (the party was excluded from the government six month prior to scheduled elections) (3) - Democratic Party of Retired Persons of Slovenia (1) 1a. What was the size of the cabinet before the election? prime minister +16 ministries = 14 ministries + 2 without portfolios 2. Report the number of portfolios (cabinet posts) held by each party in cabinet, after the most recent election. (If one party holds all cabinet posts, simply write "all"). Name of Political Party Number of Portfolios - Slovenian Democratic Party (8) - New Slovenia (4) - Slovenian People’s Party (3) - Democratic Party of Retired Persons of Slovenia (1) 2a. What was the size of the cabinet after the election? prime minister + 16 ministries = 15 ministries + 1 without portfolio Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 2 Module 2: Macro Report 3.