What the Founding Fathers Really

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

What the Founding Fathers Really FI Feb-Mar 07 Pages 12/26/06 1:04 PM Page 58 REVIEWS as the wolverines (Gulo gulo, some- for it is a human attitude and quality that other species from extinction, as far as times called the devil bear because of has moral and aesthetic dimensions. we can. What is rather noteworthy their ferocious and cunning capacity as Wilson is not simply a “nonbeliever.” about this book is Wilson’s plea to fellow predators or skunk bear because they He rejects the idea that God created the humans on this planet—whether reli- look like a hybrid of the two species). universe and states that there is no evi- gious or not—“that we set aside our dif- Pitchfork ants (Thaumatomyrmex) are dence for life after death and that ethics ferences in order to save the creation. masterpiece rare forms that are distrib- is not derived from theology but comes The defense of living nature is a univer- uted across the tropics. They have a from human experience. On the con- sal value,” he affirms, “it serves without bizarre exotic anatomy, which lends trary, he holds that the theory of natural discrimination all of humanity.” them their title as the “porcupine selection explains the evolution of This book makes important recom- huntresses” of millipedes. All of these species from lower forms; that morality mendations not only for secular human- diverse species are wonders to behold. is related to human needs and interests, ists (atheists, rationalists, skeptics), Wilson quotes Charles Darwin’s rever- biologically grounded and socially func- given the damage to our global habitat, ence for life. In On the Origin of Species, tioning; that humans use science to but for all human beings who share a Darwin presents a profound appreciation understand nature; and that they are common planetary abode with other of its diversity: “There is grandeur in this Prometheans free to develop a better forms of life. We have no alternative but view of life, with its special power having world. We humans, he says, have the to heal wounds and hold out our hands been originally breathed into a few forms task of using “reason, law, honor, and an in a common effort for the betterment of or into one; and that, whilst this planet inborn sense of decency” as a basis of life. This means that we need to bring has gone cycling on according to the fixed our code of ethics. together religionists and scientists— law of gravity, from so simple a beginning, Thus, Wilson is not an “evangelical though there are real differences endless forms more beautiful and more atheist” so much as a secular humanist, between them—to save our common wonderful have been, and are being, holding a core of ethical values and humanity, our respect for other species evolved.” principles. “Human welfare is at the and the planet Earth. This is a powerful The term reverence expresses an center of our thought,” he states. But he and eloquent plea that is especially rel- appreciation, sympathy, and compassion also defends “biophilia” (the love of evant today, and it needs to be heard for life in all its beauty. This does not life). This leads to the following impera- loud and clear, in spite of the naysayers imply any supernatural manifestations, tive: we ought to endeavor to rescue in our midst. nation’s founders has become a cottage WHAT THE FOUNDING FATHERS industry for both conservatives and lib- erals. Religious conservatives wish to EALLY HOUGHT prove that the framers of the Consti- R T tution were devout Christians, as if their private beliefs could negate their signa- tures on a secular Constitution that Susan Jacoby makes no mention whatever of God, gods, or even the vaguely deistic The Faiths of the Founding Fathers, by David L. “Providence.” Many secular liberals, by Holmes (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006, contrast, seem to think that if the ISBN 1955300920) 240 pp. Cloth $20.00. Founders are seen as deists or agnos- tics (a word that did not even exist in Washington’s God: Religion, Liberty, and the Father the eighteenth century), their rejection of Our Country, by Michael Novak and Jana Novak of orthodox faith can somehow serve as (New York: Basic Books, 2006, ISBN 04650512X) an effective political weapon against the 256 pp. Cloth $26.00. current right-wing assault on the sepa- ration of church and state. The desire to search for guidance on he question I am asked most fre- Thomas Jefferson, and George Wash- every public issue in the lives and writ- quently by interviewers is, “What ington, my customary answer is, “Who ings of the men who wrote the Declar- Twere the real religious beliefs of knows? What they really believed ation of Independence and the Consti- the Founding Fathers?” Since I cannot about religion matters much less than tution is part of the larger phenomenon channel the spirits of John Adams, what they did to separate their person- of Founder worship, a form of idolatry al beliefs from the government they indulged in by many historians as well Susan Jacoby is the author of Free- founded.” as politicians. For religious conserva- thinkers: A History of American Secular- With the rise of the Religious Right tives who idolize the Founders (or, to be ism and the program director of the during the past twenty-five years, dis- more precise, their religiously correct Center for Inquiry/New York City. secting the private religious views of the image of the Founders), it is nearly free inquiry http://www.secularhumanism.org 58 FI Feb-Mar 07 Pages 12/26/06 1:04 PM Page 59 REVIEWS impossible to admit that many of their in motion but subsequently took no One of the Novaks’ least persuasive idols were freethinkers who opposed all active part in the affairs of humans. arguments is that the Enlightenment ecclesiastical hierarchies and entangle- However, deism and freethought can be “borrowed many themes from the ments between church and state. For understood more accurately as a spec- Jewish-Christian past: fraternity, secularists, it is often equally difficult to trum of belief, from “Christian deists” equality, liberty…sensitivity to the cat- acknowledge that some of their most who participated in religious obser- egory of cruel and inhumane treatment revered Founders, while hardly ortho- vances even though they rejected any lit- of human beings, the moral evil of slav- dox Christians, nevertheless believed in eral interpretation of the scriptures to ery, and the rest” (p. 108). They are a supreme being and hoped for some non-Christian deists who eschewed reli- right only in the most obvious sense sort of afterlife. gious rituals and explicitly rejected doc- that all philosophies incorporate, Like the Bible, the writings of the rev- trines like the trinity and the divinity of adapt, and reject many elements of ear- olutionary generation can be used selec- Jesus. Doubters—or, to be more precise, lier philosophies. Before the tively to support almost any point of view. men suspected of being doubters—were Enlightenment, Christianity had pre- The sheer volume of correspondence, numerous in public life but outright athe- cious little to say about the evil of slav- public papers, essays, and books pro- ists (as far as their private letters can be ery and American Christians who used duced by these intellectual omnivores of taken as a true statement of their beliefs) the Bible to justify slavery were far the Enlightenment serves up ample were nonexistent. more numerous, until the middle of the material for polemicists of every stripe. What all of the deists and free- nineteenth century, than those who In The Faiths of the Founding thinkers shared—and they dominated used the Bible to condemn slavery. It Fathers—as the use of the plural the assembly that produced the was Christianity—a nonconformist “faiths” suggests—David L. Holmes has, Constitution—was the conviction that Christianity that embraced the equality in admirable fashion, avoided the ideo- both religious interference with govern- of bodies as well as souls—that was logical ax grinding that leads to ana- ment and government interference with modified by Enlightenment thought. chronistic analyses of the framers’ reli- religion were disastrous. That is why The Jewish Enlightenment did the gious beliefs. Holmes, a professor of Washington, a Christian deist in the same for traditional Judaism, and religious studies at the College of view of most mainstream historians, Spinoza was a towering precursor of William and Mary, covers the entire and Benjamin Franklin, a non-Christian the Enlightenment both within and spectrum of revolutionary religion— deist, could embrace a Constitution that beyond the faith into which he was from Thomas Jefferson’s Enlightenment broke with historical precedent and born. deism and explicit rejection of Christ’s ascribed governmental power not to a As for Jews, applying the term divinity to the orthodoxy of Samuel supreme being but to “We the people.” Judeo-Christian to anyone in the revo- Adams, the fiery Boston patriot who In Washington’s God, Michael lutionary generation is an anachronism, (unlike his cousin, John) remained loyal Novak and Jana Novak, his daughter, born of the desire of today’s apostles of to the Puritanism of his ancestors. accept none of these picky distinctions. religious correctness to pretend that all The book also includes, unusually, a Novak, a fellow at the American Enter- monotheistic Americans have always discussion of the faiths of the wives and prise Institute, is also a conservative been part of the same tradition of sweet- daughters of the Founders—an illumi- Roman Catholic who frequently criti- ness, light, and civic morality.
Recommended publications
  • Susan Jacoby God Bless America
    SICK AND TIRED OF « GOD BLESS AMERICA » By Susan Jacoby - New York Times Feb. 5, 2016 - THE population of nonreligious Americans — including atheists, agnostics and those who call themselves “nothing in particular” — stands at an all-time high this election year. Americans who say religion is not important in their lives and who do not belong to a religious group, according to the Pew Research Center, have risen in numbers from an estimated 21 million in 2008 to more than 36 million now. Despite the extraordinary swiftness and magnitude of this shift, our political campaigns are still conducted as if all potential voters were among the faithful. The presumption is that candidates have everything to gain and nothing to lose by continuing their obsequious attitude toward orthodox religion and ignoring the growing population of those who make up a more secular America. Ted Cruz won in Iowa by expanding Republican voter turnout among the evangelical base. Donald J. Trump placed second after promising “to protect Christians” from enemies foreign and domestic. The third-place finisher Marco Rubio’s line “I don’t think you can go to church too often” might well have been the campaign mantra. Mr. Rubio was first christened a Roman Catholic, baptized again at the age of 8 into the Mormon Church, and now attends a Southern Baptist megachurch with his wife on Saturdays and Catholic Mass on Sundays. Democrats are only a trifle more secular in their appeals. Hillary Clinton repeatedly refers to her Methodist upbringing, and even Bernie Sanders — a cultural Jew not known to belong to a synagogue — squirms when asked whether he believes in God.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonreligious Cultures and Communities in the United States 3000/4000 Level Course in Sociology
    Nonreligious Cultures and Communities in the United States 3000/4000 Level Course in Sociology Jacqui Frost **This is an updated version of a course I helped develop and teach in the sociology department at the University of Minnesota with Penny Edgell in 2016. This course was developed to be an upper-division course for juniors and seniors and could easily be cross-listed with religious studies or American studies.** Course Description What does it mean to be nonreligious in the United States today? There has been a rapid rise in those who identify as nonreligious over the past 30 years, and atheists, agnostics, and other “Nones” now comprise over 20% of the U.S. population. What are the various types of nonreligious identities and reasons for being nonreligious in the U.S. context? How do nonreligious individuals organize into groups oriented toward identity-formation, social connection, and political action? What are Americans' attitudes toward atheists, atheism, and non-belief, and are these attitudes changing? This course will promote a critical examination of the changing landscape of religious nonbelief in the United States, placing contemporary American atheism, agnosticism, and humanism in sociological and historical context. Throughout the course, we will focus on the varieties of religious and non-religious experience and engage with sociological debates about secularization in the late-modern context. Learning Outcomes 1. Demonstrate an understanding of the causes and consequences of increased religious disaffiliation in the United States. 2. Demonstrate an understanding of key sociological concepts, terms, and theories related to religious and nonreligious identities, beliefs, and practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 15: Resources This Is by No Means an Exhaustive List. It's Just
    Chapter 15: Resources This is by no means an exhaustive list. It's just meant to get you started. ORGANIZATIONS African Americans for Humanism Supports skeptics, doubters, humanists, and atheists in the African American community, provides forums for communication and education, and facilitates coordinated action to achieve shared objectives. <a href="http://aahumanism.net">aahumanism.net</a> American Atheists The premier organization laboring for the civil liberties of atheists and the total, absolute separation of government and religion. <a href="http://atheists.org">atheists.org</a> American Humanist Association Advocating progressive values and equality for humanists, atheists, and freethinkers. <a href="http://americanhumanist.org">americanhumanist.org</a> Americans United for Separation of Church and State A nonpartisan organization dedicated to preserving church-state separation to ensure religious freedom for all Americans. <a href="http://au.org">au.org</a> Atheist Alliance International A global federation of atheist and freethought groups and individuals, committed to educating its members and the public about atheism, secularism and related issues. <a href="http://atheistalliance.org">atheistalliance.org</a> Atheist Alliance of America The umbrella organization of atheist groups and individuals around the world committed to promoting and defending reason and the atheist worldview. <a href="http://atheistallianceamerica.org">atheistallianceamerica.org< /a> Atheist Ireland Building a rational, ethical and secular society free from superstition and supernaturalism. <a href="http://atheist.ie">atheist.ie</a> Black Atheists of America Dedicated to bridging the gap between atheism and the black community. <a href="http://blackatheistsofamerica.org">blackatheistsofamerica.org </a> The Brights' Net A bright is a person who has a naturalistic worldview.
    [Show full text]
  • Reclaiming the Intellectual Emily Houh University of Cincinnati College of Law, [email protected]
    University of Cincinnati College of Law University of Cincinnati College of Law Scholarship and Publications Faculty Articles and Other Publications College of Law Faculty Scholarship 2018 Reclaiming the Intellectual Emily Houh University of Cincinnati College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.uc.edu/fac_pubs Part of the Law and Society Commons, and the Legal Profession Commons Recommended Citation Houh, Emily, "Reclaiming the Intellectual" (2018). Faculty Articles and Other Publications. 371. https://scholarship.law.uc.edu/fac_pubs/371 This Response or Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law Faculty Scholarship at University of Cincinnati College of Law Scholarship and Publications. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Articles and Other Publications by an authorized administrator of University of Cincinnati College of Law Scholarship and Publications. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ohio Aortbern ntberttp latu Rebteb lBean'o lecture beries Reclaiming the Intellectual EMILY M.S. HOUH* INTRODUCTION I was invited to deliver the September 2017 Dean's Lecture, on which this essay is based, in March of 2017, shortly after the inauguration of Donald J. Trump as the 4 5 th president of the United States. I had originally planned to present on one of my longstanding research areas, the intersections of contract law and critical race theory, but as the spring wore on, I began to feel an urgency about using my expertise to comment more directly on the increasingly overt but trenchant race, gender, sex, and class inequalities and conflicts that have plagued our nation for centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Atheism Course Syllabus for Young Scholars in American Religion (Fall 2019)
    Atheism Course Syllabus for Young Scholars in American Religion (Fall 2019) Joseph Blankholm Department of Religious Studies University of California, Santa Barbara Institutional and Curricular Setting: The University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) is a public research university and one of 10 campuses comprising the University of California system. As of 2019, the school enrolled just over 23,000 undergraduates and just under 3,000 graduate students. 85% of those undergraduates are from California, and more than 40% will be the first in their family to graduate from a 4-year college; 36% are white, 30% Latinx, 28% Asian or Pacific Islander, and 5% black. The school is officially designated a Hispanic Serving Institution, which means that at least 25% of its student body is Hispanic. With strong departments across the sciences, humanities, and fine arts, UCSB ranked as the 5th-best public university in the country in 2019 according to US News & World Report. The university is on the quarter system, with three 10-week quarters stretching from late September through early June. Geographically, the university is located on the Pacific coast, 10 miles outside of downtown Santa Barbara. Formed in 1964, UCSB’s Department of Religious Studies has been among the pioneers of the secular study of religion and has built its reputation on its theoretical rigor, its wide range of specializations, its diverse language offerings, and its focus on the fringes of what is traditionally considered religious. It offers Bachelor’s, Master’s, and Doctorate degrees, and with 25 tenure-track faculty, is the largest Religious Studies department in the University of California system.
    [Show full text]
  • Freethought Volume 2 No
    The Tampa Bay Coalition of Reason Freethought Volume 2 No. 4 April 2013 Jim Peterson, Editor News Organization for Progress and Equality) in What’s Inside? Compassionate Humanists? Hillsborough County. Both organizations have When most people think of humanists, they think: been very effective in influencing public Intellectual? Atheist? Godless? Anti-religion? Anti- policy in areas of job creation, literacy, Unified Calendar… ... ... 2 establishment? Self-centered? Mean spirited? ...and healthcare and affordable housing. Humanist Society…... 3 * on ad-infinitum. The fact is that sometimes they are I don't think that we would have to look very far to quite right. However, the humanists I know, besides find other organizations where we could become Tampa Humanists…. 5 * being very independent thinkers, are also some of the effective. I believe that it is time to stop Atheists of FL ……. 6 * most kind, caring, altruistic and considerate people I relinquishing matters of injustice and caring to Clr.UU-Humanists… 7 * have ever met. Where is the disconnect? I believe faith communities, after all, as humanists, we are Post Carbon Council..8 that the disconnect is only a matter of perception. committed to improving the earth and its Many, if not all of us, have had a tendency to live inhabitants here and now. That is our only reward. Freethought Films…..9 mostly in our heads and pursue our own definitions We are compassionate, not because we fear the of truth, sometimes courageously and publicly, but “loss of heaven or the pains of hell”, but because it Humanist Families…. 10 * most of the time anonymously or in our small group is the right thing to do.
    [Show full text]
  • RICHARD DAWKINS Ends All Debate
    RICHARD DAWKINS Ends All Debate Celebrating Reason and Humanity WINTER 2002/03 • VOL. 23 No. 1 f Susan HAACK • Christopher HITCHENS Nat HENTOFF Peter SINGER Paul KURTZ • • Introductory Price $5.95 U.S. / $6.95 Can. 24> John Dewey and Sidney Hook Remembered 7725274 74957 Published by The Council for Secular Humanism THE AFFIRMATIONS OF HUMANISM: A STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES* We are committed to the application of reason and science to the understanding of the universe and to the solving of human problems. We deplore efforts to denigrate human intelligence, to seek to explain the world in supernatural terms, and to look outside nature for salvation. We believe that scientific discovery and technology can contribute to the betterment of human life. We believe in an open and pluralistic society and that democracy is the best guarantee of protecting human rights from authoritarian elites and repressive majorities. We are committed to the principle of the separation of church and state. We cultivate the arts of negotiation and compromise as a means of resolving differences and achieving mutual understanding. We are concerned with securing justice and fairness in society and with eliminating discrimination and intolerance. We believe in supporting the disadvantaged and the handicapped so that they will be able to help themselves. We attempt to transcend divisive parochial loyalties based on race, religion, gender, nationality, creed, class, sexual orientation, or ethnicity, and strive to work together for the common good of humanity. We want to protect and enhance the earth, to preserve it for future generations, and to avoid inflicting needless suffering on other species.
    [Show full text]
  • Susan Lynn Jacoby
    Susan Lynn Jacoby OHS Class of 1963 “Too many Americans have twisted the sensible right to pursue happiness into the delusion that we are entitled to a guarantee of happiness. If we don’t get exactly what we want, we assume someone must be violating our rights. We’re no longer willing to write off some of life’s disappointments to simple bad luck.” <Click the portrait for <Click the portrait for Susan in high school> Susan's career biography> Books Authored by Susan Jacoby <click for Susan’s Website and to order books> Moscow Conversations (1972) “The author, a journalist and wife of a Moscow correspondent, submits an indignant report on the difficulties of being a resident foreigner in that city, and the special dishonesties and disabilities of the foreign journalist's life in the Moscow ""ghetto."" (Source) The Friendship Barrier: Ten Russian Encounters (1972, British edition) Inside Soviet Schools (1974) The Possible She (1979) Wild Justice: The Evolution of Revenge (1983) Traces the history of Western attitudes towards revenge and justice, looks at sexual revenge, capital punishment, and the U.S. criminal justice system, and considers the portrayal of revenge in popular novels and movies. Soul to Soul: A Black Russian American Family, 1865-1992 (with Yelena Khanga) (1994) Half-Jew: A Daughter's Search for Her Family's Buried Past (2000) “A journalist journeys back into her family's own hidden past…” Freethinkers: A History of American Secularism (2004) "Jacoby accomplishes her task with clarity, thoroughness, and an engaging passion."
    [Show full text]
  • RLE 2012.11.09D Panel 3 Transcript
    BOSTON COLLEGE BOISI CENTER FOR RELIGION AND AMERICAN PUBLIC LIFE Symposium on Religion and the Liberal Aims of Higher Education Transcription of Panel III: “Dynamic Tensions” Friday, November 9, 2012, 3:00pm The Heights Room of Corcoran Commons, Boston College featuring: Susan Jacoby Eboo Patel Author and Independent Scholar Founder and President, Interfaith Youth Core Nicholas Wolterstorff Moderated by Mark Oppenheimer Noah Porter Professor Emeritus of New York Times columnist and Lecturer in Philosophical Theology, Yale University English at Yale University Introduced by Erik Owens Associate Director, Boisi Center for Religion and American Public Life, Boston College OWENS: Thank you all. We are moving apace through the day, coming now to our final panel discussion of the afternoon. Directly after this panel, without break, will be the brief closing remarks by our president, Father Leahy. After that, more food and drink to celebrate and continue the conversations we have started here. So I invite you to take your seats now and join me for what promises to be a terrific conversation that we’re describing—perhaps euphemistically—as “dynamic tensions.” We’re delighted to have as our moderator Mark Oppenheimer, columnist from the New York Times as well as a lecturer in English at Yale University, and he’ll take over from here. Thank you, Mark. OPPENHEIMER: Okay, thank you. Welcome. It so happens, Erik, that I lost all the notes you gave me on the phone about what I’m supposed to do, which is great, because then I get to do what I want to do. Let me just say, first of all, that as ever you have these panelist biographies in your brochure.
    [Show full text]
  • Atrium School Summer 2016 Reading List
    Atrium School Summer 2016 Reading List Welcome to Atrium's 2016 Summer Reading Suggestions! I hope you will find this a fun and useful resource as you look for great books to read this summer. The list is organized by categories, so that you can quickly and easily jump to your favorites: Picture Books/Early Readers: p.1 Animal Stories, p.4 Fantasy, Folk & Fairy Tales, and Science Fiction, p.5 Graphic Novels, p.13 Historical Fiction, p.15 Mystery, Suspense, and Adventure, p.16 Realistic Fiction, p.19 In a Category All By Itself, p.26 Within each category, there is also some color-coding, to help with age/grade recommendations. Note that, of course, no age/grade recommendations apply to everyone, all the time. So, use this color-coding system simply as a helpful guideline when looking through the list: Blue = PreK - 2nd Grade Green = 3rd - 6th Grades Maroon = Middle School Orange = Mature Middle School (Generally 8th Grade - High School) Gray = The Gray Areas -- where a book may either appeal to a broader age span or otherwise not fit neatly into the above categories. Many people have contributed to this diverse list; Atrium kids are by far the largest group of contributors this year -- a huge thank you to all those kids who shared book reviews! In addition, several Atrium teachers have contributed reviews, and scattered among all the categories are my own summer picks (listed as "Susan Picks"!). Enjoy the list and PLEASE feel free to share feedback with me and all readers of this list by commenting on the Blog! Happy Summer Reading! Susan
    [Show full text]
  • Faithless: the Politics of New Atheism
    SECULARISM & Kettell, S 2013 Faithless: The politics of new atheism. Secularism and ISSSC Nonreligion, 2: 61-72, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/snr.al NSRN NONRELIGION RESEARCH ARTICLE Faithless: The politics of new atheism Steven Kettell*1 The emergence of ‘new atheism’ during the course of the last decade helped fuel an upsurge of interest in issues around religion. But scholarly analysis of new atheism, particularly its political dimensions, remains embryonic. This paper addresses this lacuna by examining the politics of new atheism across a variety of themes related to politics. These include the causal factors underpinning its emergence and development, its organisational structure and composition, the political strategies pursued by its proponents, and the various internal tensions and conflicts that these dynamics have produced. Introduction One area that has been peculiarly absent from studies of The early years of the twenty-first century thrust issues new atheism, however, has been its political dimension). around religion to the forefront of public and political The point is exemplified by a recently edited volume on debate. One of the defining features of this was the emer- new atheism, purporting to offer a rounded examination gence of a more activist form of atheism, known as the of the topic, which includes work from “the fields of reli- ‘new atheism’, which sought to openly challenge and criti- gious studies, sociology of religion, sociology of science, cise religious beliefs and to promote the virtues of reason, philosophy, and theology” (Amarasingham, 2010: 2), but rationality and science. Fueled by a series of best-selling contains nothing in the way of political analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report
    PROGRESS 2016 REPORT Message from the President and CEO This aptly named Progress Report gives you a sense of the Cen- CFI’s efforts to stand up for secular people here and abroad were ter for Inquiry’s incredible ambition and range of endeavors to particularly active in 2016. As a multi-year project, we have been promote reason and science. From our two flagship magazines, Free challenging the exclusion of secular celebrants from those who Inquiry and Skeptical Inquirer, to our work defending secular activists may solemnize marriages. In too many states, religious leaders are around the world at the United Nations Human Rights Council, automatically given the right to solemnize marriages alongside cer- CFI is working to bring the values of the Enlightenment—critical tain public officials, while secular celebrants are excluded. In 2014 thinking, scientific literacy, humanism, and individual freedom—to we won a lawsuit against Indiana’s exclusion, and just at the start the 21st century. of 2017, we heard the good news that an Illinois judge opened the way for secular celebrants there as well. The big news for CFI is that we have formally merged with the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason & Science (RDFRS). Another notable CFI victory was the crackdown by the Federal Throughout 2016, the two organizations worked hand-in-glove. Trade Commission on the marketing of homeopathy, something Now, we are one, with RDFRS becoming a division of CFI, CFI had urged in formal testimony. Hopefully this will put a dent and the RDFRS board, including Richard Dawkins, joining the in the $3 billion a year that Americans spend on this consumer CFI board.
    [Show full text]