DOCSLIB.ORG

Proposed Development of a Timeshare Resort Located on Portion 101 Tenbosch Near the Crocodile River, Mpumalanga Province

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Draft Basic Assessment Report Proposed Development Of A Timeshare Resort Located On Portion 101 Tenbosch Near The Crocodile River, Mpumalanga Province Prepared by: Contents Acronyms and abbreviations .................................................................................................................. iv GLOSSARY OF TERMS .......................................................................................................................... iv SECTION A: ACTIVITY INFORMATION .................................................................................................... 1 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................ 1 2. FEASIBLE AND REASONABLE ALTERNATIVES ......................................................................... 2 3. SITE ACCESS............................................................................................................................. 5 4. LOCALITY MAP .......................................................................................................................... 5 5. LAYOUT/ ROUTE PLAN .............................................................................................................. 6 6. SENSITIVITY MAP ...................................................................................................................... 6 7. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS ................................................................................................................. 6 8. FACILITY ILLUSTRATION ........................................................................................................... 6 9. ACTIVITY MOTIVATION .............................................................................................................. 6 10. APPLICABLE LEGISLATION, POLICIES AND/OR GUIDELINES ................................................ 7 11. WASTE AND EFFLUENT ....................................................................................................... 12 12. WATER USE ......................................................................................................................... 12 SECTION B: SITE/AREA/PROPERTY DESCRIPTION .............................................................................. 13 13. GROUNDWATER, SOIL AND GEOLOGICAL STABILITY OF THE SITE .................................... 13 14. GROUNDCOVER .................................................................................................................. 13 15. SURFACE WATER ................................................................................................................ 14 16. LAND USE CHARACTER OF SURROUNDING AREA .............................................................. 14 17. CULTURAL/HISTORICAL FEATURES .................................................................................... 15 18. SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHARACTER .......................................................................................... 15 19. BIODIVERSITY ..................................................................................................................... 15 20. VISUAL ................................................................................................................................ 22 SECTION C: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION .................................................................................................. 22 1. ADVERTISEMENT AND NOTICE................................................................................................ 22 2. DETERMINATION OF APPROPRIATE MEASURES..................................................................... 23 3. ISSUES RAISED BY INTERESTED AND AFFECTED PARTIES .................................................... 23 4. COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT .................................................................................... 23 5. AUTHORITY PARTICIPATION ................................................................................................... 24 6. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER STAKEHOLDERS ...................................................................... 24 SECTION D: IMPACT ASSESSMENT ..................................................................................................... 24 1. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE PLANNING AND DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATIONAL, DECOMMISSIONING AND CLOSURE PHASES AS WELL AS PROPOSED MANAGEMENT OF IDENTIFIED IMPACTS AND PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES ....................... 24 2. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT .................................................................................. 40 SECTION E. RECOMMENDATION OF PRACTITIONER ...................................................................... 43 SECTION F: APPENDIXES .................................................................................................................... 45 List of Appendices Appendix A: Maps A.1: Locality A.2.1: Preferred Alternative- Layout A.2.2: Alternative 2- Layout A.3.1: Preferred Alternative- Sensitivity A.3.2: Alternative 2- Sensitivity Appendix B: Photographs PROPOSED TENBOSCH TIMESHARE RESORT I Appendix C: Facility illustration(s) Appendix D: Specialist reports D.1: Geotechnical Report D.2: Riparian and Wetland Report D.3: Heritage Report D.4: Ecology Report D.5: Visual Report Appendix E: Public Participation Appendix F: Impact Assessment Appendix G: Environmental Management Programme (EMPr) Appendix H: Details of EAP and expertise Appendix I: Specialist’s declaration of interest Appendix J: Additional Information PROPOSED TENBOSCH TIMESHARE RESORT II Foreword This report constitutes the Draft Basic Assessment Report, and has been circulated digitally for Stakeholder Comment on 8 November 2016. NuLeaf Planning and Environmental would like to thank all Stakeholders for their participation and input into this process to date, and hereby invite Stakeholders to review this draft report and to provide feedback, input, concerns and comments. All written comments received, including NuLeaf’s response to each, will be captured in a Comments and Responses Register, which will be made available to all I&AP’s and included in the Final Basic Assessment Report for submission to the Mpumalanga Department of Agriculture, Rural Development, Land and Environmental Affairs. All comments on the Draft BAR must be in writing and must reach NuLeaf by no later than close of business on 8 December 2016. Please mark all comments for the attention of: Bryony van Niekerk Email: [email protected] Tel: (012) 753 5792 Fax: (086) 571 6292 PROPOSED TENBOSCH TIMESHARE RESORT III Acronyms and abbreviations BA: Basic Assessment BAR: Basic Assessment Report CBA: Critical Biodiversity Area CMP: Construction Management Plan DARDLEA: Mpumalanga Department of Agriculture, Rural Development, Land and Environmental Affairs DWS: South African National Department of Water and Sanitation EA: Environmental Authorisation ECO: Environmental Control Officer EIA: Environmental Impact Assessment EMPr: Environmental Management Programme EMS: Environmental Management System EO: Environmental Officer I&AP: Interested and Affected Party IDP: Integrated Development Plan IEM: Integrated Environmental Management KNP Kruger National Park LED: Local Economic Development MTPA: Mpumalanga Tourism and Parks Agency NEMA: National Environmental Management Act, Act No. 107 of 1998 NEMPAA: National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act, Act No. 57 of 2003 NPAES: National Protected Area Expansion strategy OMP: Operational Management Plan SAHRA: South African Heritage Resources Agency GLOSSARY OF TERMS Alien Vegetation: Alien vegetation defined as undesirable plant growth which shall include, but not be limited to all declared category 1 and 2 listed invader species as set out in the Conservation of Agricultural Resources Act (CARA) regulations. Alien Species: A plant or animal species introduced from elsewhere: neither endemic nor indigenous. Alternatives: In relation to a proposed activity, means different means of meeting the general purpose and requirements of the activity, which may include alternatives to: (a)The property on which or location where it is proposed to undertake the activity; (b) The type of activity to be undertaken; (c) The design or layout of activity; (d) The technology to be used in the activity; and (e) The operational aspects of the activity. Applicant: Any person who applies for an authorization to undertake an activity or to cause such activity to be undertaken as contemplated in the National Environmental Management Act (Act No. 107 of 1998), as amended and the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2010. PROPOSED TENBOSCH TIMESHARE RESORT IV Buffer zone: Is a collar of land that filters out inappropriate influences from surrounding activities, also known as edge effects, including the effects of invasive plant and animal species, physical damage and soil compaction caused by trampling and harvesting, abiotic habitat alterations and pollution. Buffer zones can also provide more landscape needed for ecological processes, such as fire. Construction Activity: Any action taken by the Contractor, his subcontractors, suppliers or personnel during the construction process. Ecology: The study of the inter relationships between organisms and their environments. Environment: All physical, chemical and biological factors and conditions that influence an object and/or organism. Environmental Impact: An Impact or Environmental Impact is the degree of change to the environment, whether desirable
Recommended publications
  • Vascular Plant Survey of Vwaza Marsh Wildlife Reserve, Malawi

    Vascular Plant Survey of Vwaza Marsh Wildlife Reserve, Malawi

    YIKA-VWAZA TRUST RESEARCH STUDY REPORT N (2017/18) Vascular Plant Survey of Vwaza Marsh Wildlife Reserve, Malawi By Sopani Sichinga ([email protected]) September , 2019 ABSTRACT In 2018 – 19, a survey on vascular plants was conducted in Vwaza Marsh Wildlife Reserve. The reserve is located in the north-western Malawi, covering an area of about 986 km2. Based on this survey, a total of 461 species from 76 families were recorded (i.e. 454 Angiosperms and 7 Pteridophyta). Of the total species recorded, 19 are exotics (of which 4 are reported to be invasive) while 1 species is considered threatened. The most dominant families were Fabaceae (80 species representing 17. 4%), Poaceae (53 species representing 11.5%), Rubiaceae (27 species representing 5.9 %), and Euphorbiaceae (24 species representing 5.2%). The annotated checklist includes scientific names, habit, habitat types and IUCN Red List status and is presented in section 5. i ACKNOLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, let me thank the Nyika–Vwaza Trust (UK) for funding this work. Without their financial support, this work would have not been materialized. The Department of National Parks and Wildlife (DNPW) Malawi through its Regional Office (N) is also thanked for the logistical support and accommodation throughout the entire study. Special thanks are due to my supervisor - Mr. George Zwide Nxumayo for his invaluable guidance. Mr. Thom McShane should also be thanked in a special way for sharing me some information, and sending me some documents about Vwaza which have contributed a lot to the success of this work. I extend my sincere thanks to the Vwaza Research Unit team for their assistance, especially during the field work.
  • NABRO Ecological Analysts CC Natural Asset and Botanical Resource Ordinations Environmental Consultants & Wildlife Specialists

    NABRO Ecological Analysts CC Natural Asset and Botanical Resource Ordinations Environmental Consultants & Wildlife Specialists

    NABRO Ecological Analysts CC Natural Asset and Botanical Resource Ordinations Environmental Consultants & Wildlife Specialists ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE REPORT FOR HANS HOHEISEN WILDLIFE RESEARCH STATION Compiled by Ben Orban, PriSciNat. June 2013 NABRO Ecological Analysts CC. - Reg No: 16549023 / PO Box 11644, Hatfield, Pretoria. Our reference: NABRO / HHWRS/V01 NABRO Ecological Analysts CC Natural Asset and Botanical Resource Ordinations Environmental Consultants & Wildlife Specialists CONTENTS 1 SPECIALIST INVESTIGATORS ............................................................................... 3 2 DECLARATION ............................................................................................................ 3 3 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 3 4 LOCALITY OF STUDY AREA .................................................................................... 4 4.1 Location ................................................................................................................... 4 5 INFRASTRUCTURE ..................................................................................................... 4 5.1 Fencing ..................................................................................................................... 4 5.2 Camps ...................................................................................................................... 4 5.3 Buildings ................................................................................................................
  • The Financial Sustainability and Socio-Economic Contribution of Small-Scale Sugar-Cane Growers in Mpumalanga Province

    The Financial Sustainability and Socio-Economic Contribution of Small-Scale Sugar-Cane Growers in Mpumalanga Province

    The financial sustainability and socio-economic contribution of small-scale sugar-cane growers in Mpumalanga Province by RIEKIE CLOETE Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MCom (Agricultural Economics) in the Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences University of Pretoria Pretoria May 2013 © University of Pretoria DECLARATION I, Riekie Cloete, declare that the dissertation, which I hereby submit for the degree MCom (Agricultural Economics) at the University of Pretoria, is my own work and has not previously been submitted by me for a degree at this or any other tertiary institution. SIGNATURE: RIEKIE CLOETE DATE: 18 MAY 2013 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study would not have been possible without the contribution of many people and institutions. A particular word of thanks goes to my study leader, Prof Johann Kirsten, for prompt and knowledgeable assistance. I really appreciate his guidance and patience. Dr Ferdinand Meyer gave valuable guidance during the initial stages of the study. Thank you to Dr Stuart Ferrer and Mr Tshepo Pilusa (SA Canegrowers) in assisting with data where possible. Also, to Mr Justin Murray (Mpumalanga Canegrowers), Mr Roger Armitage (Akwandze Agricultural Finance), Mr Martin Slabbert (Tsb Sugar-cane Supply), Mr Herman le Roux (Tsb Sugar-cane Control) and Mr Stephan Schoeman (Agriwiz). A special word of thanks must be given to Mrs Florence Mavimbela of Tsb Sugar Extension Services and also to Mr Johan Cronje, a contractor who was willing to offer me an insight into the daily challenges of the SSGs. This study could not have been completed without his help.
  • 353 Genus Abantis Hopffer

    353 Genus Abantis Hopffer

    14th edition (2015). Genus Abantis Hopffer, 1855 Berichte über die zur Bekanntmachung geeigneten Verhandlungen der Königl. Preuss. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1855: 643 (639-643). Type-species: Abantis tettensis Hopffer, by monotypy. = Sapaea Plötz, 1879. Stettiner Entomologische Zeitung 40: 177, 179 (175-180). Type- species: Leucochitonea bicolor Trimen, by original designation. = Abantiades Fairmaire, 1894. Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique 38: 395 (386-395). [Unnecessary replacement name for Abantis Hopffer.] A purely Afrotropical genus of 25 beautiful skippers, with a varied array of colourful wing patterns. Most species of ‘paradise skippers’ are scarce or rare. Females are often very hard to find in comparison to the males. Some are forest species, whereas others are found in the African savannas. *Abantis arctomarginata Lathy, 1901 Tricoloured Paradise Skipper Abantis arctomarginata Lathy, 1901. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 1901: 34 (19-36). Abantis bismarcki arctomarginata Lathy, 1901. Ackery et al., 1995: 76. Abantis arctomarginata Lathy, 1901. Collins & Larsen, 1994: 1. Type locality: [Malawi]: “Zomba”. Diagnosis: Similar to Abantis bamptoni but hindwing more rounded; pale areas a purer white; hindwing black marginal band narrower (Congdon & Collins, 1998). Distribution: Tanzania, (south-central), Malawi. Recorded, in error, from southern Africa by Dickson & Kroon (1978) and Pringle et al. (1994: 316), and from Mozambique and Zimbabwe by Kielland (1990d). Specific localities: Tanzania – Near Mafinga, Iringa Region (Congdon & Collins, 1998); Ndembera River, Iringa Region (single female) (Congdon & Collins, 1998). Malawi – Zomba (TL); Mt. Mulanje (Congdon et al., 2010). Habits: Males defend perches from leaves about two metres above the ground (Larsen, 1991c). Males are also known to show hilltopping behaviour (Congdon & Collins, 1998).
  • The Vegetation of the Area of the Proposed Shangoni Initiative, Kruger National Park

    The Vegetation of the Area of the Proposed Shangoni Initiative, Kruger National Park

    The vegetation of the area of the proposed Shangoni Initiative, Kruger National Park May 2016 Construction of a 400 KV Line from Kusile Power Station to Lulamisa Substation (Bravo 3) DEA Ref No - 12/12/20/1094 May 2016 The vegetation of the area of the proposed Shangoni Initiative, Kruger National Park by GJ Bredenkamp DSc PrSciNat Commissioned by Limosella Consulting EcoAgent CC PO Box 23355 Monument Park 0181 Tel 012 4602525 Fax 012 460 2525 Cell 082 5767046 May 2016 Shangoni vegetation April 2016 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE ..................................................................... 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................... 5 1. BACKGROUND AND ASSIGNMENT ................................................................... 7 Scope of the study .................................................................................................. 7 Assumptions and Limitations ..................................................................................... 8 2. RATIONALE ......................................................................................................... 8 Definitions and Legal Framework.............................................................................. 9 3. STUDY AREA ....................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Location and the receiving environment .............................................................. 9 3.2 Regional Climate ...............................................................................................
  • Ehlanzeni District Municipality 2016/17

    Ehlanzeni District Municipality 2016/17

    The best performing district of the 21st century EHLANZENI DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY FINAL IDP AND BUDGET REVIEW 2016/17 1 The best performing district of the 21st century Contents EHLANZENI STRATEGIC DIRECTION FOR 2012-16 .................................................................................................................. 11 VISION ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 MISSION .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 CORE VALUES ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 11 DISTRICT STRATEGIC GOALS ......................................................................................................................................................... 11 Chapter 1 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 1.1 EXECUTIVE
  • A Farm Survey of Small-Scale Sugarcane Growers in Nkomazi, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa

    A Farm Survey of Small-Scale Sugarcane Growers in Nkomazi, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa

    Global A farm survey of Development small-scale Institute sugarcane growers in Nkomazi, Working Paper Series Mpumalanga 2017-018 province, South December 2017 Africa 1 Philip Woodhouse 1 Professor of Environment and Development, Global Development Institute, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom. Email: [email protected] Paul James2 2 Global Development Institute, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom. ISBN: 978-1-909336-41-4 Cite this paper as: Woodhouse, Phil and James, Paul (2017). A farm survey of small-scale sugarcane growers in Nkomazi, Mpumalanga province, South Africa. GDI Working Paper 2017- 018. Manchester: The University of Manchester. www.gdi.manchester.ac.uk This paper is part of a research project “Farm scale and viability: an assessment of black economic empowerment in sugar production in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa”, funded by the UK government ESRC-DFID Joint Programme on Poverty Alleviation. Grant no. ES/1034242/1 Abstract Against a context of declining sugar output in South Africa as a whole, the sugar industry in the Nkomazi Municipality of Mpumalanga Province has increased its share of the South African market. It has achieved this despite the transfer of at least 25 per cent of land growing sugarcane into black community ownership through South Africa’s land reform programme. The industry now claims that the majority of land used for sugar cane in Nkomazi is owned by the beneficiaries of land reform. This paper describes a survey of small-scale sugar-cane growers. It presents quantitative data that shows, on the one hand, a process of land concentration and ‘accumulation from below’, visible in the emergence of medium-scale growers, and, on the other hand, a move by the sugar milling company to take more direct control of sugarcane growing through rental agreements with small-scale land-owners.
  • 110Km 400Kv Power Line from Foskor MTS Near Phalaborwa to Spencer MTS

    110Km 400Kv Power Line from Foskor MTS Near Phalaborwa to Spencer MTS

    Foskor MTS Spencer MTS June 2017 Phalaborwa/Tzaneen _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 110km 400kV power line from Foskor MTS near Phalaborwa to Spencer MTS DIGES Client: DIGES Group Brenda Makanza Tel: +27 (0)11 312 2878 Fax: +27 (0)11 312 7824 546 16th Road, Constantia Park Building 2 Upstairs Midrand, 1685 Dr Wynand Vlok (Pr. Sci. Nat. 400109/95) 40 Juno Ave Sterpark Polokwane 0787 082 200 5312 [email protected] Foskor MTS Spencer MTS June 2017 Phalaborwa/Tzaneen _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BioAssets cc was appointed by the DIGES Group to do a biodiversity study that includes the assessment of flora, fauna and habitat, the status and sensitivity of the area in relation to biodiversity for the project. This study exclude the avifaunal and water resource studies. The objectives were: Undertake baseline survey and describe affected environment within the project footprint Assess the flora, fauna and habitat in relation to the current ecological status and the conservation priority within the project footprint Undertake sensitivity study to identify protected species, Red Data species, alien species and fauna within the servitude Recommend the preferred alternative and mitigation measures. The findings from this report can be summarised as: Substation – it must be noted that more than 1 hectare of indigenous vegetation will be cleared at the Spencer Substation (9ha is required). General vegetation clearing for the project – in addition, it must be noted that more than 300m2 of indigenous vegetation will be removed in the CBA areas. Alternative 1 o The natural vegetation in the corridor north of the Groot Letaba River is modified.
  • Mpumalanga No Fee Schools 2017

    Mpumalanga No Fee Schools 2017

    MPUMALANGA NO FEE SCHOOLS 2017 NATIONAL NAME OF SCHOOL SCHOOL PHASE ADDRESS OF SCHOOL EDUCATION DISTRICT QUINTILE LEARNER EMIS 2017 NUMBERS NUMBER 2017 800035522 ACORN - OAKS COMPREHENSIVE HIGH SCHOOL Secondary BOHLABELA 1 476 800034879 ALFRED MATSHINE COMMERCIAL SCHOOL Secondary STAND 7B CASTEEL TRUST BUSHBUCKRIDGE BOHLABELA 1 673 800030445 AMADLELO ALUHLAZA SECONDARY SCHOOL Secondary PHILA MYENI AVENUE ETHANDAKUKHANYA PIET RETIEF GERT SIBANDE 1 1386 800005058 AMALUMGELO PRIMARY SCHOOL Primary DWARS IN DIE WEG MORGENZON GERT SIBANDE 1 9 800000158 AMANZAMAHLE PRIMARY SCHOOL Primary PO BOX 1822 ERMELO ERMELO GERT SIBANDE 1 66 800000166 AMANZI PRIMARY SCHOOL Primary VYGEBOOM DAM BADPLAAS BADPLAAS GERT SIBANDE 1 104 800035381 AMON NKOSI PRIMARY SCHOOL Primary STAND NO. 6099 EXTENTION 12 BARBERTON EHLANZENI 1 727 800000240 ANDISA PRIMARY SCHOOL Primary STAND NO 3050 MABUYENI SIYABUSWA NKANGALA 1 286 800034906 ANDOVER PRIMARY SCHOOL Primary OKKERNOOTBOOM TRUST ACORNHOEK ACORNHOEK BOHLABELA 1 259 800034851 APLOS CHILOANE PRIMARY SCHOOL Primary KAZITHA TRUST ARTHURSEAT ACORNHOEK BOHLABELA 1 325 VLAKVARKFONTEIN 800000307 ARBOR PRIMARY SCHOOL Primary ARBOR DELMAS NKANGALA 1 351 FARM 800034852 ARTHURSEAT PRIMARY SCHOOL Primary ARTHURSEAT I ACORNHOEK ACORNHOEK BOHLABELA 1 236 800000406 BAADJIESBULT PRIMARY SCHOOL Combined APPELDOORN FARM CAROLINA CAROLINA GERT SIBANDE 1 184 800035179 BABATI PRIMARY SCHOOL Primary JUSTICIA TRUST JUSTICIA TRUST XIMHUNGWE BOHLABELA 1 500 800034907 BABINATAU SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL Secondary DINGLEDALE "B" ACORNHOEK
  • Ehlanzeni District Municipality

    Ehlanzeni District Municipality

    INFRASTRUCTURE READINESS STUDY EHLANZENI DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY Project No. : EDM / 03 / 2011-12 Project Name : Sibange Regional Bulk Water Supply Scheme Date : April 2015 Prepared By: Prepared For: Lubisi Consulting Engineers Ehlanzeni District Municipality 20 Branders Street 8 van Niekerk Street P O Box 12393 PO Box 3333 Nelspruit Nelspruit 1200 1200 Tel: 013 752 6416 Tel: 013 759 8500 Fax: 013 752 6418 Fax: 013 755 8539 E-mail: [email protected] Contact: Mr C T Pagiwa Contact: Mr P Du Toit Sibange Bulk Water Scheme IRS Lubisi Consulting Engineers SIBANGE BULK WATER SUPPLY SCHEME AND FUTURE EXTENSIONS NKOMAZI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY INFRASTRUCTURE READINESS STUDY Approval Sibange Bulk Water Supply Scheme And Future Extensions - Infrastructure Title Readiness Study EDM Report No. EDM 03 / 2011-12 Consultant Lubisi Consulting Engineers Report Status Date April 2015 Study Team - Lubisi Consulting ........................................................................ ..................................................................... Mr C T Pagiwa Pr Eng Mr SP Tshuma Director Engineer Project Manager Study Leader Ehlanzeni District Municipality Team ........................................................................ ........................................................................ Adv M Mbatha Mr P Du Toit Municipal Manager Deputy Manager Water & Sanitation Ehlanzeni District Municipality Ehlanzeni District Municipality Executive Summary Sibange Bulk Water Scheme serves several villages of Nkomazi Local Municipality. The scheme
  • IDP 2020-2021 First Draft

    IDP 2020-2021 First Draft

    NKOMAZI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY DRAFT INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN (2017-2021) REVIEW 2020/2021 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms ................................................................................................................................ 9 Glossary ................................................................................................................................ 10 Message From The Executive Mayor ................................................................................... 11 Municipal Overview - Municipal Manager .......................................................................... 12 Legislations Underpinning Idp In South Africa .................................................................... 13 1.1. Development Principles For The For Planning, Drafting, Adopting And Review Of IDP 13 1.1.1. Section 26 Core Components Of The IDP .............................................................. 14 1.2. Municipal Background ............................................................................................... 16 1.2.1. Municipal Wards And Traditional Authority ......................................................... 17 1.3. How was the Plan developed? .................................................................................... 21 1.4. Communication Plan for Public Participation ............................................................ 21 1.4.1. Below is an advert placed on the advert ................................................................. 23 1.4.2. Other activities that
  • A Smallgrower's Challenge to 'Emerge'

    A Smallgrower's Challenge to 'Emerge'

    A Smallgrower’s Challenge to ‘Emerge’ Exploring the diversity of evapotranspiration, biomass, yield production and crop water productivity of sugar cane in the Lower Komati sub-catchment, South Africa M.Sc. Thesis by G.M. ten Napel March 2009 Irrigation and Water Engineering Group A Smallgrower’s Challenge to ‘Emerge’ Exploring the diversity of evapotranspiration, biomass, yield production and crop water productivity of sugar cane in the Lower Komati sub-catchment, South Africa Master thesis Irrigation and Water Engineering submitted in partial fulfillment of the degree of Master of Science in International Land and Water Management at Wageningen University, the Netherlands G.M. ten Napel March 2009 Supervisors: Dr. Ir. Flip Wester Dr. Ir. Richard Soppe Dr. Ir. Gerardo van Halsema Irrigation and Water Engineering Group WaterWatch Centre for Water and Climate Remote Sensing Services Wageningen University Wageningen The Netherlands The Netherlands http://www.iwe.wur.nl http://www.waterwatch.nl ABSTRACT The Inkomati catchment is one of 19 Water Management Areas (WMAs) in South Africa bordering Mozambique and Swaziland. Within the Inkomati WMA, the Lower Komati sub- catchment is an area of intensive sugarcane farming. Historically, the area was reserved for large scale ‘white’ commercial farming, but since Apartheid came to an end in 1994, the South African government is aiming to redress the racial and gender inequities of the past. In 1994, the Nkomazi Irrigation Expansion Programme (NIEP) was started with the objective to promote economic development for the ‘black’ people in the area. 9,800ha of previously under utilized land was transformed into 1500 irrigated sugarcane farming ventures.