1 Reporting Agency: UNDP Country: ARMENIA PROGRESS REPORT

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Reporting Agency: UNDP Country: ARMENIA PROGRESS REPORT Reporting Agency: UNDP Country: ARMENIA PROGRESS REPORT No. and title: 00003762 Catalyzing Financial Stability for Armenia’s Protected Areas Systems Reporting period: October 1 to December 31, 2013 I. PURPOSE The overall objective of the project is to secure long‐term financial sustainability of the Armenian PA system. This will be achieved through two components: (1) ensuring sufficiency and predictability of revenue sources for the PA system and (2) raising cost‐effectiveness and capacities of PAs. II. RESULTS Overall The mid‐term evaluation of the project was carried out by the auditor of UNDP/GEF. The financial scorecard was upgraded in the frame of MTR, but still needs to be approved by the Ministry. According to the scorecard we have met our mid‐term target by funding 135% of basic needs and 54% of optimal needs. Preliminary findings were shared by the MTE expert with UNDP, CNF and Ministry. We are waiting for the mid‐term report. For: Activity1. 1.1. Support for Protected Areas CNF provided its funding in two disbursements made during the year. In September/October PAs received second disbursements made according to the plan. The total CNF funds provided per PA, including unspent fund from last year, and actual expenditures of those funds by the PAs are shown in the table below; CNF Funding Actual Expenses December Name of PA Provided*, Thus Spent, % 31st, thus. AMD AMD Khosrov Forest State Reserve 58,967.9 55,090.6 93 Shikahogh State Reserve 43,663 40,786.6 93 Arevik National Park 34,904.6 27,691.5 79 Lake Arpi National Park 14,069.3 12,862.4 91 Arzakan‐Meghradzor Sanctuary 24,381.5 16,668 68 Total 175,986.3 153,099.1 87 *Including unspent funds from 2012 The CNF financial support covered an essential part of the running costs of PAs and made possible to obtain important equipment for future development of the parks. In spite of the fact that all PAs reported satisfactory results, the poor organization and lack of knowledge for effective procurement is one the main obstacles and has to be improved. 1 PAs asked for several amendments in the budgets during the year. Almost all requests approved by CNF. Khosrov Forest received new car, horses, beehives, cameras, recording systems, GPSs etc. In addition, CNF decided to add 3.5 mln AMD to renovate horse stable in Vedi district. The renovation is in the process now. The tragic accident happened in the Reserve which cost the life of the Ranger in Garni district. CNF supported the family of the killed Ranger. Shikahogh Reserve had delays in procurement, but finally, with the support of the Ministry and CNF, could overcome difficulties. As they couldn’t organize renovation of some infrastructure in time, it was decided to reallocate funds for other purposes; they bought 8 horses, saddles etc. The also obtained a new car plus some important administrative and protection equipment. Arevik NP planned to partly renovate administrative building in Nrnadzor. It was agreed to add some more funds next year and completely restore it. “Adaptation to Climate Change Impacts in Mountain Forest Ecosystems of Armenia” UNDP-supported GEF-funded project requested CNF to support Arevik NP with additional funds to organize aerial pest control in 500 ha of forests and maintenance of recently reforested 20 ha area. CNF agreed and allocated funds for this joint pilot project. Arzakan – Meghradzor prepared tender documents for preparation of management plan, but will announce it on the beginning of next year. Lake Arpi NP and Arzakan – Meghradzor will continue their grant projects. Some amendments will be needed in both PAs. First of all, it is connected with increase of salaries from state budget. The budget of Lake Arpi has increased about 4 times for 2014. Ministry and PA are going to hire a lot of new staff for the park. Arzakan – Meghradzor is planning to buy a new 4 wheel pick up with firefighting equipment. The final amended budgets will be provided to CNF on January‐ middle of February. 1.2 Development of CNF (Fundraising) CNF has continued its development activities and has held talks with several corporate and other donors regarding potential support in 2013 and 2014. We were successful in securing a major new commitment of €3 million ($4 million) from BMZ to increase financial contribution to the CNF’s permanent endowment capital. HSBC bank Armenia is still the only corporate donor for Armenia. With their transfer of $ 10 000 Khosrov Forest State Reserve bought horses, saddles and beehives. Donations from corporate and individual donors were also received from September’s donor trip to Armenia and Georgia. For: Activity 2. 2.1. Technical and financial audits. The technical audit team started visits to PAs. It is planned to receive reports in the middle of February of 2014. Financial audit will be implemented according to the plan, on the second quarter of the year. As the technical audit recommended full HR audit in the Khosrov Forest State Reserve, CNF signed a contract with KPMG to implement it. KPMG provided the final report on the end of December, which included the analysis of current situation, findings and recommendations, job 2 descriptions of the staff, and, the main result of the work, an updated organogram of it. The report and ToRs were provided to Ministry in January of 2014. 2.2. PA Capacity Building. TJS has organized trainings and provided new accounting software with notebook to PAs. As it was mentioned in previous report, CNF supported Khosrov Forest to hire a specialist to do on the spot training on software and create a data base starting from the beginning of 2013. TJS started monitoring of the task in December. The report will be ready on January‐mid February. Internet banking systems haven’t been installed in PAs yet. TJS will provide the value of its technical assistance in 2013 for the financial report in February 2014. The signing of the Memorandum of Understanding between CNF, WWF Armenia and National Competitiveness Foundation of Armenia (NCFA) has been delayed till February. PAs have huge potential of ecotourism development but not realized yet. CNF highlighted the importance of projects to develop visitors and/or ecotourism projects. This will be one of the priorities in preparation of final budgets. For: Activity 3. CNF continued to carry out its management and monitoring responsibilities in respect of the project during the period. III. 2014 ANNUAL WORK PLAN For: Activity1 1.1 Support for Protected Areas. In 2014, work in PAs previously supported by CNF is planned as follows: Arevik, Shikahogh (from January first both– “Zangezur” Biosphere Complex) with a one year contract pending further developments on the organization of the new complex and KfW’s support under the open program, Khosrov Forest with a one year grant pending implementation of a new HR plan, Khosrov has prepared a draft budget already. One of the innovations in the Khosrov is that they included some elements of financial planning and program budgeting into their recent budgets. Arzakan – Meghradzor under the existing grant with focus on the preparation of a management plan Lake Arpi PA under the existing grant Work in PAs not supported last year by CNF is planned as follows: Dilijan NP for the creation of a Management Plans. Dilijan NP Management Plan tender is in the process yet and several good applications have been received. The commission will be established by the order of Minister to evaluate the results of the tender. It is planned to start management planning from February of 2014. 3 “Caucasus Wildlife Refuge” PA – a NGO Managed Private PA in the buffer zone of Khosrov Forest has applied to CNF for the support. The support to “Gnishik” PA – a new established Community Managed PA in Vayotc Dzor region has been discussed. The application forms with budgets and work plans will be ready till the middle of February. The total budget for Armenia will be about euro 500 000. The new application forms, budgets and work plans will be ready till the mid February. 1.2 Development of CNF (Fundraising). CNF will continue to carry out its ordinary fundraising activity for the future development of the projects during the period. We will continue our fundraising efforts for Armenia’s PAs. It is planned to apply to HSBC with the new project proposal for Khosrov Forest (or other PA) on financing development projects and to work with the Ministry on other corporate fundraising activities For Activity 2 2.1 Technical monitoring and financial audits. The technical and financial audits will be organized according to the agreements. 2.2 PA Capacity Building. For the PA capacity building are planned to; ‐ Work with Ministry to improve the overall management and particularly procurement in PAs, ‐ discuss the HR audit report made by KPMG for Khosrov Forest and support to implementation of its recommendations, ‐ sign the MoU with WWF Armenia and NCFA and start to implement projects according to the MoU, ‐ Look at for additional funds and organizations to support capacity building in PAs and particularly on ecotourism development, ‐ Continue to monitor the effectiveness of accounting software usage and provide trainings in other PAs upon necessity, For: Activity 3 CNF will continue to carry out its management and monitoring responsibilities in respect of the project during the period. 4 .
Recommended publications
  • Legends of Nature
    Legends of Nature Protected Areas of the Southern Caucasus ARMENIA Implemented by: 2 Armenia Arevik Dilijan Khosrov Forest Arevik Dilijan Khosrov Forest National Park National Park State Reserve Sunny Mountains – Arevik Beauty in Harmony with Natural Forces and Royal National Park, embedded in Nature - Armenia’s Little Temples – Visitors to Khosrov the catchment of the rivers Switzerland fascinates Forest State Reserve can Meghri, Shvanidzor and with unequalled Caucasian experience the results of Nrnadzor, is one of the woodlands, flowering nature’s elementary forces on youngest protected areas of highland sceneries, curative the shape of the landscape. Armenia. springs and clear lakes. Page 14 Page 10 Page 12 Lake Arpi Sevan Shikahogh Lake Arpi Sevan Shikahogh National Park National Park State Reserve Beauty on the Border – Open Armenia’s “Blue Pearl” – Treasures of Nature – plains, extensive wetlands, Lake Sevan is one of the Shikahogh is one of the few gentle slopes and ever- largest and highest freshwa- places in Armenia where changing seasonal colours ter lakes in the world and a dense pristine broadleaf make Lake Arpi an ideal paradise for birdwatchers. forests have survived. place for birdwatching and Page 18 Page 20 reflection. Page 16 Zangezur & Plane Grove Cross-border Routes Discover fascinating contrasts of Zangezur & Plane Grove Sanctuaries the Caucasus from ice-capped high mountain peaks to subtropi- Plane Grove and Zangezur sanctuaries are famous for their cal landscapes, continental ancient trees and have the potential to develop some of Armenia’s steppes and dense forests. best scenic trails. Two cross-border routes through Page 22 Armenia and Georgia include highlights of protected areas and cultural monuments in the Lesser and Greater Caucasus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Significance/Importance and Role of Specially Protected Nature Areas in the Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape Diversity
    The significance/importance and role of Specially Protected Nature Areas in the protection of biodiversity and landscape diversity The landscapes of Specially Protected Nature Areas of Armenia and challenges of their protection SPNAs play pivotal role in the conservation and restoration of nature, as they contribute to the reduction of anthropogenic impact on the environment ensuring ecological balance, biological and landscape diversity conservation. SPNAs being integral part of the country's total environmental system, are included in the effective nature use system and in interaction with the operating areas implement environment conservative and resource- saving functions. Currently the following SPNAs operate in the Republic: 3 state reserves (“Khosrov forest”, “Shikahogh” and “Erebuni”), which cover 35 439.6 ha territory or 1.19% of Armenia’s total area; 4 national parks (“Sevan”, “Dilijan”, “Lake Arpi” and “Arevik”) which cover 236802.1 ha territory or 7.96 % of Armenia’s total area; 27 state sanctuaries which cover 114 812.7 ha territory or 3.95% of Armenia’s total area; and 232 natural monuments. Due to the complex relief and altitudinal and zonal alternation of the Armenia, even on the small territory of the country it is possible to distinguish six climatic types and 10 landscape zones from semidesert areas to snow covered highlands. There are also a number of intrazonal ecosystems (wetlands, rocks, screes), which are present almost in all altitudinal zones. The location of the country in the intersection of three biogeographical provinces, diversity of climatic conditions and active geological processes have resulted in formation of diverse ecosystems and rich biodiversity with high level of endemism.
    [Show full text]
  • “National Capacity Self Assessment for Global Environmental Management”
    “NATIONAL CAPACITY SELF ASSESSMENT FOR GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT” UNDP/GEF/ARM/02/G31/A/1G/99 YEREVAN 2004 The current report has been prepared under UNDP/GEF “National Capacity Self- Assessment for Global Environmental Management” project, executed by the Ministry of Nature Protection and implemented by United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) under financial assistance of Global Environment Facility (GEF). The project is aimed at assessment of capacity needs for fulfilment of commitments of Armenia under the United Nations Conventions on Biological Diversity, Climate Change and to Combat Desertification. The ultimate goal of the project is to develop a National Action Plan for capacity building in the cross-cutting areas which can ensure the synergistic effect. Project Coordinator - Diana Harutyunyan Project Assistant - Gayane Simonyan Editor – Mikhail Vermishev Consultants – Simon Papyan, First Deputy Minister of Nature Protection, Aram Gabrielyan UNFCCC Focal Point, Tatyana Danielyan UNCBD Focal Point, Ashot Vardevanyan UNCCD Focal Point The project expresses its special gratitude to Aram Ter-Zakaryan and Georgi Arzumanyan, project National Directors, and Anahit Simonyan, UNDP Environment and Energy Portfolio Manager, for support and professional advice in guiding NCSA process. Project also acknowledges substantive contribution of all organizations and individuals in preparation of the current study. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.1. Commitments Towards Convention Objectives and Implementation Issues in Armenia ...... 13 1.2. Convention
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas in Armenia
    Freshwater Ecosystems and Biodiversity of Freshwater ATLAS Key Biodiversity Areas In Armenia Yerevan 2015 Freshwater Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Atlas of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas in Armenia © WWF-Armenia, 2015 This document is an output of the regional pilot project in the South Caucasus financially supported by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Norway (MFA) and implemented by WWF Lead Authors: Jörg Freyhof – Coordinator of the IUCN SSC Freshwater Fish Red List Authority; Chair for North Africa, Europe and the Middle East, IUCN SSC/WI Freshwater Fish Specialist Group Igor Khorozyan – Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Germany Georgi Fayvush – Head of Department of GeoBotany and Ecological Physiology, Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences Contributing Experts: Alexander Malkhasyan – WWF Armenia Aram Aghasyan – Ministry of Nature Protection Bardukh Gabrielyan – Institute of Zoology, National Academy of Sciences Eleonora Gabrielyan – Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences Lusine Margaryan – Yerevan State University Mamikon Ghasabyan – Institute of Zoology, National Academy of Sciences Marina Arakelyan – Yerevan State University Marina Hovhanesyan – Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences Mark Kalashyan – Institute of Zoology, National Academy of Sciences Nshan Margaryan – Institute of Zoology, National Academy of Sciences Samvel Pipoyan – Armenian State Pedagogical University Siranush Nanagulyan – Yerevan State University Tatyana Danielyan – Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences Vasil Ananyan – WWF Armenia Lead GIS Authors: Giorgi Beruchashvili – WWF Caucasus Programme Office Natia Arobelidze – WWF Caucasus Programme Office Arman Kandaryan – WWF Armenia Coordinating Authors: Maka Bitsadze – WWF Caucasus Programme Office Karen Manvelyan – WWF Armenia Karen Karapetyan – WWF Armenia Freyhof J., Khorozyan I. and Fayvush G. 2015 Freshwater Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Atlas of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas in Armenia.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing the Protected Area System of Armenia
    UNDP Project Document – Amendment for split of the project into two subprojects After decision to execute one part of the project by WWF, the project was split into two subprojects by means of budget revision, creating two AWPs with separate Atlas numbers and budgets. The signed versions of AWP between UNDP and WWF Armenia and the signed version of the budget revision of the existing AWP between UNDP and the Ministry of Nature Protection are attached in PIMS database and Atlas system. UNDP-GEF Medium-Size Project (MSP) Government of Republic of Armenia United Nations Development Programme PIMS: 3986 Subproject with NEX execution: Atlas Award 00057439; Atlas Project ID 00070966 Subproject with NGO execution: Atlas Award 00060500; Atlas Project ID 00076187 Developing the Protected Area System of Armenia Brief description: The project’s goal is to conserve globally significant biodiversity in Armenia. The project’s objective is to catalyze the expansion of the nature reserves to provide better representation of ecosystems within Armenia’s current protected area system and enable active conservation of biodiversity. The project’s two components will focus upon: (1) rationalization of the PA system through improving the regulatory and institutional framework relevant to Sanctuary establishment and operation; and (2) institutional capacity building by piloting a suite of Sanctuary management tools largely absent from Armenian’s current protected area management regime. This project’s efforts will result in a national protected area system better equipped to include and conserve currently under- represented ecosystems and associated species. Project investment will be in community areas to improve management of productive landscapes while helping to promote connectivity and alleviate poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of Dry Grasslands in Armenia: First Results from the 13Th EDGG Field Workshop in Armenia
    12 Palaearctic Grasslands 46 ( J u ly 20 2 0) Scientific Report DOI: 10.21570/EDGG.PG.46.12-51 Biodiversity of dry grasslands in Armenia: First results from the 13th EDGG Field Workshop in Armenia Alla Aleksanyan1,2 , Idoia Biurrun3 , Elena Belonovskaya4 , Beata Cykowska-Marzencka5 , Asun Berastegi6 , Andreas Hilpold7 , Philipp Kirschner8 , Helmut Mayrhofer9 , Dariia Shyriaieva10 , Denys Vynokurov10 , Thomas Becker11 , Ute Becker12 , Iwona Dembicz13,14 , George Fayvush1 , Dieter Frank15 , Martin Magnes9 , Itziar García-Mijangos3 , Marine Oganesian16 , Salza Palpurina17 , Aslan Ünal18 , Yuliia 19 13,20,21* Vasheniak & Jürgen Dengler 1Department of Geobotany and Plant Eco-Physiology, Institute of Botany 12Green School in the Botanic Garden, Johannes Gutenberg University after A.L. Takhtajyan, NAS RA, Acharyan 1, 0040, Yerevan, Armenia; al- Mainz, Anselm-Franz-von-Bentzel-Weg 9 b, 55128 Mainz, Germany; beck- [email protected]; [email protected] [email protected] 2Chair of Biology and Biotechnology, Armenian National Agrarian Universi- 13Vegetation Ecology, Institute of Natural Resource Sciences (IUNR), Zurich ty, Teryan 74, 0009, Yerevan, Armenia University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), Grüentalstr. 14, 8820 Wädenswil, 3Department of Plant Biology and Ecology, University of the Basque Coun- Switzerland; [email protected]; [email protected] try UPV/EHU, P.O. Box 644, 48080 Bilbao, Spain; [email protected]; 14Department of Plant Ecology and Environmental Conservation, Faculty of [email protected] Biology, University of Warsaw, ul. Zwirki I Wigury 101, 02-089 Warsaw, 4Department of Biogeography, Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Poland Sciences, Staromonetny per. 29, 119017 Moscow, Russia; ebe- 15Saxony-Anhalt Environment Agency, Reideburger Str. 47, Halle 06116, [email protected] Germany; [email protected] 5Department of Mycology, W.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlands in Armenia – Their Values and Threats and Their Contribution to Sustainable Development and Poverty Alleviation
    5th European Regional Meeting on the implementation and effectiveness of the Ramsar Convention 4-8 December 2004, Yerevan, Armenia Keynote Wetlands in Armenia – their values and threats and their contribution to sustainable development and poverty alleviation Karén Jenderedjian Standing Committee Ministry of the Nature Conservation In the imaginary “list of Ramsar records” the United Kingdom is the record holder with the highest number of Ramsar sites (159), Canada holds the largest Ramsar territories (total 13,051,501 ha), Botswana holds the largest single Ramsar site Okawango Delta System (6,864,200 ha), and Armenia’s Ramsar sites are amongst those covering the largest area of the country’s surface: one sixth (4,922 km2 of 29,743 km2). Diversity of Wetlands in Armenia The Armenian Database of Wetlands of International, National and Local Importance includes 24 inland wetland types according to the Ramsar Classification System. Of rivers only 4 are >100 km long (Arax, Debed, Hrazdan, Vorotan). Most rivers have strongly pronounced seasonal water flow fluctuations; many of them are seasonal. Few rivers form small deltas. Among the lakes and ponds with a surface >1 ha, Lake Sevan is the largest freshwater lake of the Caucasus, Asia Minor and Middle Asia regions. Lake Arpi (Shirak Marz) is the second largest lake of Armenia. Both lakes are designated in the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance. In the mountains of Geghama, Zangezur, and Aragats a large number of small lakes (<1 ha) exist, mainly fed by snowmelt. The larger lakes are fed by well-developed tributary river systems. Lake Ayghr is fed exclusively by groundwater.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Isbn 99940-58-55-X
    AN ECOREGIONAL CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE CAUCASUSAN ECOREGIONAL CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE CAUCASUS Second Edition May 2006 ISBN 99940-58-55-X Design and printing Contour Ltd 8, Kargareteli street, Tbilisi 0164, Georgia May, 2006 Coordinated by: In collaboration with: With the technical support of: Assisted by experts and contributors: ARMENIA MAMMEDOVA, S. NAKHUTSRISHVILI, G. POPOVICHEV, V. AGAMYAN, L. MUKHTAROV, I. NINUA, N. PTICHNIKOV, A. AGASYAN, A. NAJAFOV, A. SERGEEVA, J. BELANOVSKAYA, E. AKOPYAN, S. ORUJEV, Ad. SIKHARULIDZE, Z. SALPAGAROV, A. AMBARTSUMYAN, A. ORUJEV, Al. SOPADZE, G. SHESTAKOV, A ARZUMANYAN, G. RAKHMATULINA, I. TARKHNISHVILI, D. SKOROBOGACH, J. BALYAN, L. RZAEV, R. TOLORDAVA, K. SPIRIDONOV, V. DANYELYAN, T. SATTARZADE, R. TAMOV, M. DAVTYAN, R. SAFAROV, S. IRAN TUNIEV, B. GABRIELYAN, E. SHAMCHIYEV, T. AGHILI, A. VAISMAN, A. GLYCHIAN, D. SULEIMANOV, M. EVERETT, J. (Coordinator) BELIK, V. GRIGORYAN, E. SULTANOV, E. FARVAR, M.T. JENDEREDJIAN, K. TAGIEVA, E. JAZEBIZADEH, K. KAZARYAN, H. KAVOUSI, K. TURKEY KAZARYAN, M. GEORGIA MAHFOUZI, M. ALTINTAS, M. KHASABYAN, M. ARABULI, A. MANSURI, J. ATAY, S KHOROZYAN, I. ARABULI, G. NAGHIZADEH, N BIRSEL, A. MANVELYAN, K. (Coordinator) BERUCHASHVILI, G. NAJAFI, A. CAN, E. MARKARYAN, N. BERUCHASHVILI, N. ZIYAEE, H. CIFTCI, N. MURADYAN, S. BUKHNIKASHVILI, A. RAHMANIYAN, M. DOMAC, A. RUKHKYAN, L. BUTKHUZI, L. GURKAN, B. SHASHIKYAN, S. CHEKURISHVILI, Z. IPEK, A. TOVMASYAN, S. DIDEBULIDZE, A. RUSSIA KALEM, S. VANYAN, A. DZNELADZE, M. BIRYUKOV, N. KUCUK, M. VARDANYAN, J. EGIASHVILI, D. BLAGOVIDOV, A. KURDOGLU, O. VOSKANOV, M. GELASHVILI, A. BRATKOV, V. KURT, B. ZIROYAN, A. GOGICHAISHVILI, L. BUKREEV, S. LISE, Y. (Coordinator) ZORANYAN, V. GOKHELASHVILI, R. CHILIKIN, V. URAS, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Analysis Update for Armenia Final Report Prosperity, Livelihoods and Conserving Ecosystems (Place) Iqc Task Order #4
    BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS UPDATE FOR ARMENIA FINAL REPORT PROSPERITY, LIVELIHOODS AND CONSERVING ECOSYSTEMS (PLACE) IQC TASK ORDER #4 February 2009 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by the Armenia Biodiversity Update Team of ECODIT. ECODIT Contract #EPP-I-04-06-00010-00; Task Order #04 AUTHORITY Prepared for USAID/Armenia under Prosperity, Livelihoods and Conserving Ecosystems (PLACE) Indefinite Quantity Contract number EPP-I-04-06-00010-00, Task Order #04 awarded 14 November 2008, entitled Biodiversity Analysis Update for Armenia (“Armenia Biodiversity Update”). This “Armenia Biodiversity Update” was completed in reference to the task order. The views expressed and opinions contained in this report are those of the Armenia Biodiversity Assessment Team and are not intended as statements of policy of either USAID or the contractor. PREPARED BY: ARMENIA BIODIVERSITY UPDATE TEAM ASSEMBLED BY ECODIT, INC. ECODIT, Inc. 1800 N. Kent Street, Suite 1260 Arlington, VA 22209 USA Tel: +1 703 841 1883 Fax: +1 703 841 1885 Web: www.ecodit.com BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS UPDATE FOR ARMENIA – FINAL REPORT FEBRUARY 17, 2009 ECODIT Contract #EPP-I-04-06-00010-00; Task Order #04 BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS UPDATE FOR ARMENIA FINAL REPORT PROSPERITY, LIVELIHOODS AND CONSERVING ECOSYSTEMS (PLACE) IQC TASK ORDER #4 DISCLAIMER The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS UPDATE FOR ARMENIA – FINAL REPORT FEBRUARY 17, 2009 ECODIT Contract #EPP-I-04-06-00010-00; Task Order #04 [this page intentionally blank] BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS UPDATE FOR ARMENIA – FINAL REPORT FEBRUARY 17, 2009 ECODIT Contract #EPP-I-04-06-00010-00; Task Order #04 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY his Biodiversity Analysis update responds to requirements of Section 119(d) of the FAA of 1961 (as T amended) and ADS 201.3.8.2 regarding biodiversity analysis for country strategic plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Specially Protected Nature Areas of Armenia
    MINISTRY OF NATURE PROTECTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA NAZIK KHANJYAN SPECIALLY PROTECTED NATURE AREAS OF ARMENIA YEREVAN 2004 ……..NAZIK KHANJYAN, Specially Protected Nature Areas of Armenia, Yerevan, “Tigran Mets”, 2004, 54 pages, 79 photos. This publication is the English translation of the second amended edition of “Specially protected areas of Armenia” (2004, in Armenian). It summarizes many years of research and fieldwork by the author as well as numerous scientific publications on the subject. The publication is devoted to the fulfillment of the commitments of the Republic of Armenia under the UN Convention on Biodiversity and the 45th anniversary of establishment of specially protected areas in Armenia. The publication is intended for teachers, students, nature protection and nature use professionals and readers at large. Editor - Samvel Baloyan, Ph.D., Professor, Corresponding Member of the Academy of Ecology of the Russian Federation. Photos by Nazik Khanjyan, Vrezh Manakyan, Robert Galstyan, Martin Adamyan, Edward Martirosyan, Hrach Ghazaryan, Aghasi Karagezyan, Norik Badalyan Design by Edward Martirosyan Editor of the English translation Siranush Galstyan ISBN @ N.Khanjyan, 2004 The publication has been prepared under the “National Capacity Self-Assessment for Global Environmental Management” Project, UNDP/GEF/ARM/02/G31/A/1G/99 2 INTRODUCTION The Republic of Armenia is located in the north-eastern part of the Armenian Plateau and occupies 29,740 km2 at altitudes ranging from 375 to 4095 meters above sea level. Armenia is a mountainous country with a characteristic ragged relief and a wide variety of climatic conditions and soils. In addition, Armenia is located on the intersection of two different physical-geographic areas, particularly, various botanical-geographic regions, such as the Caucasian mesophilous and Armenian-Iranian xerophilous ones, where natural speciation is active.
    [Show full text]
  • Peatlands of Armenia / Moore in Armenien 323-333 © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; Download Unter
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Stapfia Jahr/Year: 2005 Band/Volume: 0085 Autor(en)/Author(s): Jenderedjian Karen Artikel/Article: Peatlands of Armenia / Moore in Armenien 323-333 © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Peatlands of Armenia K. JENDEREDJIAN Abstract: Armenia with an area of 29.743 km! is a mountainous country with a minimum altitude of 375 m and a maximum of 4.091 m a.s.l. (Mount Aragats). Depending on the character of origin, relief, hy- drology and plant formations 7 types of wetlands are distinguished in Armenia. Of them mires, sloping fens, bogged meadows, ephemeral and suspended marshes that are situated between altitudes 1.400 and 2.400 m a.s.l. can be considered as peat producing wetlands. The presence of Salvinia natans, white wa- ter-lily (Nymphaea alba, N. Candida), banana lily (Nymphoides peltata), bloder-worts (Ucricularia minor, U. intermedia) is characteristic sign of these wetlands. At least 70 peat deposits with total surface 3.000 ha are known in Armenia. Three peat deposits: Gilli, Saratovka and Shahnazar are of commercial impor- tance with total volume of peat 50 million m3. Armenian peat is of good agrochemical quality. In the 1980s total peat output was ca. 100.000 m3 annually. Main use of peat was in agriculture (fer- tiliser, litter for cattle) and balneology (mud cure). At present estimated peat excavation is about 50.000 m3 annually mainly for fuel. Peat producing wetlands are widely used for haying, grazing, especially dur- ing the dry season.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecoregion Conservation Plan
    List of Contributors ARMENIA Seyed-Mohammadreza Fatemi, Islamic Azad University Aram Agasyan, Ministry of Nature Protection Mohammad Baqherzadeh-Karimi, Iranian Department Arthur Alaverdyan, State Forest Monitoring Centre of Environment Luba Balyan, Armenian Society of Protection of Birds NGO Mina Torki, Expert Tatyana Danielyan, Ministry of Nature Protection Asghar Mohammadi Fazel, Iranian Department Siranush Galstyan, WWF Armenia Branch of Environment Mamikon Ghasabyan, Institute of Zoology, Behzad Saeedpour, University of Environment National Academy of Sciences Hossein Mohammadi, Iranian Department of Environment Eleonora Grigoryan, Ministry of Nature Protection Mohammad S. Farhadinia, Iranian Cheetah Society Diana Harutyunyan, UNDP Armenia Ali Bali, Iranian Department of Environment Karen Jenderedjian, UNDP Armenia Mohammad Nosrati, Iranian Department of Environment Mark Kalashian, Institute of Zoology, Bagher Nezami, University of Environment /Iranian National Academy of Sciences Cheetah Society Nazik Khanjyan, Institute of Botany, Hadi Jafari, University of Environment National Academy of Sciences Mohammadreza Masoud, East Azerbaijan Society Igor Khorozyan, WWF Armenia Branch for Protection of Wildlife Karen Manvelyan, WWF Armenia Branch Alexander Malkhasyan, WWF Armenia Branch RUSSIA Siranush Muradyan, Ministry of Nature Protection Sergey Bukreev, A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology Aram Ter-Zakaryan, UNDP Armenia and Evolution Mikhail Voskanov, Ministry of Nature Protection Gadzhibek Dzhamirzoev, Federal State Institution «Daghestansky
    [Show full text]