Case Book for Opening Submissions for the Applicants Table Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Case Book for Opening Submissions for the Applicants Table Of Case book for Opening Submissions for the Applicants Table of contents 1. Report of the Special Tribunal on an application to amend the Water Conservation (Buller River) Order, 20 December 2007 2. Rangitata South Irrigation Ltd v New Zealand and Central South Island Fish and Game Council Dec No. C 109/2004 3. Report of the Special Tribunal on a Water Conservation Order Application for the Oreti River, November 2007 4. Interim Decision on Application to Vary the Buller Water Conservation Order, 11 July 2007 5. Re Talley as Trustees for Majac Trust EnvC C006/06 6. Re an Inquiry into the Draft National Water Conservation (Kawarau) Order C33/1996 7. NZ Paper Mills Ltd v Otago Acclimatisation Soc [1995] NZRMA 155 8. Re Whitewater New Zealand Inc [2013] NZEnvC 131 9. Re an Inquiry into the Draft National Water Conservation (Mohaka River) Order W20/92 (PT) 10. Ashburton Acclimatisation Society v Federated Farmers [1988] 1 NZLR 78;12 NZTPA 289 CA 11. Report and Recommendation of the Inquiry into the National Water Conservation Order for the Buller River; PT Wellington, C32/96 Decision No. C I o /2004 4 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of an application for a water conservation order pursuant to section 201 of the Act BETWEEN RANGITATA SOUTH IRRIGATION LIMITED @MA 80’7102) TIMARU DISTRICT COUNCIL (RMA 80X/02) TRUSTPOWER LIMITED @MA 809/02) RANGITATA DIVERSION RACE MANAGEMENT LIMITED @MA 810102) FEDERATED FARMERS OF NEW ZEALAND INCORPORATED (RMA 812102) CANTERBURY REGIONAL COUNCIL (RMA 815102) Submitters AND NEW ZEALAND AND CENTRAL SOUTH ISLAND FISH AND GAME COUNCIL Applicant BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Environment Judge J R Jackson (presiding) Environment Commissioner C E Manning Deputy Environment Commissioner R Grigg 2 HEARING at Christchurch on 13-17,20-24 October, 3-7 November 2003; at Timaru on 10. 12 November 2003 and in Christchurch on 10-14, 17-21 and 31 May and 2, 3 June 2004. River and canal inspections on 12 November 2003 and 26 May 2004. (Final submissions received 11 June 2004) APPEARANCES Mr P J Mime and Mr J G A Winchester for Rangitata South Irrigation Limited and Timaru District Council Mr N Davidson QC and Ms Dunningham for Rangitata Diversion Race Management Limited and for TrustPower Limited Ms C English and Ms A Undorf-Lay for Federated Farmers of New Zealand Incorporated Mr M Wallace for Canterbury Regional Council Mr S W Christensen for the New Zealand Fish and Game Council and the Central South Island Fish and Game Council Ms M Baker for New Zealand Recreational Canoeing Association, New Zealand Rafting Association, W Keenan, Rangitata Instream Users Group and Save the Rivers Ms B Burt and Ms J Appleyard for Rangitata Dairies and Others Ms A Limmer for Te Runanga o Ngai Tahu Mr E Alty for the Director General of Conservation Ms E Sage for Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society Dr C D B Burt for himself Mr T Hay for Friends of the Earth Ms P Steven and Mr A Prebble for Ashburton District Council Mrs A P Grigg for herself Mr N G Black for Shepherds Bush Limited INTERIM REPORT ON A PROPOSED RANGITATA WATER CONSERVATION ORDER To: The Minister for the Environment The parties 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Paragraph Part 1 Introduction 1.1 The Special Tribunal’s Report and the background Ul 1.2 The purpose of a Water Conservation Order [I31 1.3 The requirements of Part 9 and the scheme of the RMA [311 1.4 Conclusions as to the method and purpose of the inquiry [531 1.5 Which provisions of the Special Tribunal’s Report are challenged? [601 Part 2 Are certain characteristics outstanding? 2.1 Habitat for terrestrial or aquatic organisms [@I 2.2 Fishery F21 2.3 Recreational, historical, spiritual or cultural purposes t901 2.4 Other characteristics PO31 2.5 Significance under tikanga maori [IO51 Part 3 Is a water conservation order necessary? 3.1 Matters to be considered [IO91 3.2 The needs of industry t1191 3.3 The relevant statutory instruments [I271 3.4 To protect habitat for black-fronted terns? [1311 3.5 To protect the salmon fishery? [1641 3.6 To protect scientific and ecological values? [I821 3.7 To protect recreational values (salmon anglingikayakingl rafting)? WI 3.8 Other matters c2171 Part 4 What terms are recommended? 4.1 Introduction c2231 4.2 The competing flow water regimes 12251 4.3 Wetlands, tributaries and groundwater [2401 [2551 WOI 4 Part 5 Appendices 5.1 Table of flows, abstractions and residual flows below Klondyke 5.2 Draft Water Conservation Order 5.3 Hydrograph for the 1998/g year 5.4 Maps: Figure 1 Rangitata River Catchment Figure 2 Lower Rangitata River PART 1 Introduction 1.1 The Special Tribunal’s Report and the background Ul On 21 October 2002 a Special Tribunal issued a report recommending that a water conservation order under Part 9 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (“the Act” or “the RMA”) be made in respect of parts of the Rangitata River in Canterbury. As required by the Act, this is a report on that report. PI The issues for the Special Tribunal to report on were: (1) What are the correct legal tests to apply when considering an application for a water conservation order? (2) Are certain characteristics of the Rangitata River outstanding? (3) Is a water conservation order necessary to sustain any outstanding characteristics? (4) What order (if any) is it appropriate to recommend? The issues for the Environment Court are, begging the answer to (1) slightly, whether the Special Tribunal was correct in its answers, or whether in the light of further evidence on some issues we should make different recommendations. We set out the background to this inquiry and answer question (1) in Part 1 of this ort. We report on the other three issues and on our recommendations in Parts 2 to 4. 5 The parties to the inquiry [41 Because of their concerns about the report and the draft water conservation order, various submitters to the Special Tribunal lodged further submissions with the Environment Court under section 209 of the RMA. At the inquiry which the Environment Court is required to conduct under section 210 of the Act we heard from the following parties: Further submitters (to the Environment Court) l The Canterbury Regional Council (“the CRC” or “ECan”); l Rangitata South Irrigation Limited (“RSIL”); l The Timaru District Council (“TDC”); l Rangitata Diversion Race Management Limited (“RDRML”); l TrustPower Limited (“TrustPower”); l Federated Farmers of New Zealand Incorporated (“FF”); Applicant l New Zealand and Central South Island Fish and Game Council (“Fish and Game”); Primsrv Submitters l The New Zealand Recreational Canoeing Association (“NZRCA”); l New Zealand Rafting Association; l Mr W Keenan; l The Ashburton and Rangitata Instream IJsers Group; l Rangitata Dairies Limited and the Rangitata Dairies Partnership; . Te Runanga o Ngai Tahu’(“Ngai Tahu”); l The Director-General of Conservation (“the Director-General”); l The Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society Incorporated (“Forest and Bird”); l DrCDBBurt; . Friends of the Earth Incorporated; 6 l The Ashburton District Council (“ADC”); * Mrs A P Grigg; * Shepherds Bush Limited. [51 Each of the parties has an interest in the Rangitata River, Several take, or wish to take, water from the river. In our inquiry we have had regard to the submissions of and evidence for each of those persons even if we do not specifically identify them further at each point on which they had something relevant to say. Some other persons lodged submissions and/or appeared at pre-hearing conferences but did not appear at the hearings. We give no weight to their submissions. Finally, although it appeared before us, Friends of the Earth Inc neither called evidence nor presented any submissions to the hearing. The Rangitata River 161 The Rangitata River is 140 kilometres long, with a catchment of 1,600 square kilometres. It runs from the glaciers and snowfields of the Southern Alps, eastwards to the Pacific Ocean. The river is one of four large braided rivers (the others are the Waimakariri, Rakaia and Waitaki) that have formed the extensive gravel outwashes that are the Canterbury Plains. A map’ of the Rangitata River catchment is included as an appendix in Part 5.4 of this decision as Figure 1. [71 The river is a very dynamic system. It has an annual mean flow* at Klondyke of 100 cubic metres per second (“cumecs’“) and a median flow at that point of 78.2 m3/sec. The mean annual flood (which occurs on average every 2.3 years) is about ten times the mean flow, Floods greater than that - more than 1,000 cumecs - carry out the major reshaping of channels and removal of weeds. WI Aider the river is joined by its three steep and fast-flowing tributaries-the Havelock, Clyde and Lawrence - the upper Rangitata flows in a broad braided stream between the Figure 1 is taken from the Special Tribunal’s Report. Dr MP Mosley evidence-in-chief pam 15. The~other abbreviations are “n?/sec” or ‘kn3/s”. Note also that 1 cubic metre = 1,000 litres. __-.-~~~ ~~-_ -- -- - -__ 7 terraces of Mesopotamia and Erewhon Stations, past Mt Sunday and the shades of Edoras. Towards the eastern end of this huge upland valley it is joined by two important salmon- spawning streams - Deep Creek from the north and Deep Stream from the south, The river then flows into a narrow gorge cut through the argillite and greywacke below Whiterock and emerges at Klondyke.
Recommended publications
  • No 82, 1 November 1928, 3119
    f,lumb 82. 3119 ",- THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE WELLINGTON, THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 1928. Land set apart as an Addition to a Public Domain. the Otokia Creek ; thence towards the north generally by ' said bank, 2650 links ; towards the east generally by the [L.S,] CHARLES FERGUSSON, Governor-General. ocean, 700 links ; towards the south generally by the ocean, A PROCLAMATION. 6100 links ; towards the west by a beach reserve, 60 links ; again towards the north by Beach Street, Township of N pursuance and exercise of the powers conferred by sub­ Brighton, 2307·2 links ; and towards the west by Bath I section nine of section twelve of the Land Act, 1924, I, Street, 440 links, and the main road, 328 links and 60 links, General Sir Charles Fergusson, Baronet, Governor-General of to the point of commencement, and excluding therefrom a the Dominion of New Zealand, do hereby proclaim and declare closed road intersecting Section 47 and numbered 1318R, a that from and after the date hereof the land comprised in deduction for which has been made from the area. the portions of close~ road describ~d in th~ First Sc~edu le Also, all that area in the Otago Land District containing hereto, being land adiacent to and mtersectmg the Brighton by admeasurement 2 acres, more or less, being Section 60, Domain described in the Second Schedule hereto, shall be Block I, Otokia Survey District, and bounded as follows : rleemed to be added to the said Brighton Domain. Towards the north generally by the Main Road, 87·6 links, 792 links; towards the south by the Ocean, 350 links, and the FIRST SCHEDULE.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Article
    NOTORNIS QUARTERLY JOURNAL of the Ornithological Society of New Zealand Volume Sixteen, Number Two, lune, 1969 NOTICE TO CONTRIBUTORS Contributions should be type-written, double- or treble-spaced, with a wide margin, on one side of the paper only. They should be addressed to the Editor, and are accepted o?, condition that sole publication is being offered in the first instance to Notornis." They should be concise, avoid repetition of facts already published, and should take full account of previous literature on the subject matter. The use of an appendix is recommended in certain cases where details and tables are preferably transferred out of the text. Long contributions should be provided with a brief summary at the start. Reprints: Twenty-five off-prints will be supplied free to authors, other than of Short Notes. When additional copies are required, these will be produced as reprints, and the whole number will be charged to the author by the printers. Arrangements for such reprints must be made directly between the author and the printers, Te Rau Press Ltd., P.O. Box 195, Gisborne, prior to publication. Tables: Lengthy and/or intricate tables will usually be reproduced photographically, so that every care should be taken that copy is correct in the first instance. The necessity to produce a second photographic plate could delay publication, and the author may be called upon to meet the additional cost. nlastrutions: Diagrams, etc., should be in Indian ink, preferably on tracing cloth, and the lines and lettering must be sufficiently bold to allow of reduction. Photographs must be suitable in shape to allow of reduction to 7" x 4", or 4" x 3f".
    [Show full text]
  • The Whitestone River by Jr Mills
    THE WHITESTONE RIVER BY J.R. MILLS Mills, John (1989) The Whitestone River -- Mills, John (1989) The Whitestone river , . ' . ' . .. _ ' . THE WHITESTONE RIVER John R Mills ---00000--- October 1989 Cover Photo Whitestone River looking upstream towards State Highway 94 bridge and Livingstone Mountain in the background. I. CONTENTS Page number Introduction III Objective ill List of photographs and maps IV Chapter 1 River Description and Location 1.1 Topography 1 1.2 Climate 1 1.3 Vegetation 3 1.4 Soils 3 1.5 Erosion 3 1.6 Water 4 Chapter 2 A Recent History and Factors that have Contributed to the River's Change 6 Chapter 3 Present use and Policy 3.1 Gravel Extraction 8 3.2 Water Rights 8 3.3 Angling 8 3.3a Fishery Requirements 9 3.4 Picnicking 9 3.5 Water Fowl Hunting 9 Chapter 4 Potential Uses 4.1 Grazing 10 4.2 Hay Cutting 10 4.3 Tree Planting 10 Chapter 5 The Public Debate 12 Chapter 6 Man's Interaction with Nature In terms of land development, berm management and their effects on the Whitestone River. 6.1 Scope of Land Development 29 6.2 Berm Boundaries 31 6.3 River Meanders 36 6.4 Protective Planting 39 6.5 Rock and Groyne Works 39 II. Chapter 7 Submissions from Interested Parties 7.1 Southland Catchment Board 42 7.2 Southland Acclimatisation Society 46 - Whitestone River Management and its Trout Fisheries 46 - Submission Appendix Whitestone River Comparison Fisheries Habitat 51 7.3 Farmers Adjoining the River 56 Chapter 8 Options for Future Ownership and Management of the River 57 Chapter 9 Recommendations and Conclusions 9.1a Financial Restraints 59 9.1 b Berm Boundary Constraints 59 9.2 Management Practices 59 9.3 Independent Study 60 9.4 Consultation 60 9.5 Rating 61 9.6 Finally 61 Chapter 10 Recommendations 62 Chapter 11 Acknowledgements 63 ---00000--- III.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Special Tribunal for the Ngaruroro and Clive Rivers Water Conservation Order
    BEFORE THE SPECIAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE NGARURORO AND CLIVE RIVERS WATER CONSERVATION ORDER AT NAPIER IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) IN THE MATTER of a Special Tribunal appointed under s202 of the Act to consider an application for a Water Conservation Order made by New Zealand Fish and Game Council, the Hawke’s Bay Fish and Game Council, Ngāti Hori ki Kohupatiki, Whitewater New Zealand, Jet Boating New Zealand, and the Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand (the Applicants) in relation to the Water Conservation Order The Special Tribunal Richard Fowler QC (Chair) Alec Neill Dr Roger Maaka Dr Ngaire Phillips John McCliskie STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF DR VAUGHAN FRANCIS KEESING (ECOLOGY) ON BEHALF OF HORTICULTURE NEW ZEALAND 25 January 2019 Helen Atkins/Nicole Buxeda PO Box 1585 Shortland Street AUCKLAND 1140 Solicitor on the record Helen Atkins [email protected] (09) 304 0421 Contact solicitor Nicole Buxeda [email protected] (09) 304 0429 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................. 3 QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE ....................................................................... 4 BACKGROUND AND ROLE ...................................................................................... 6 SCOPE OF EVIDENCE .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Short Walks in the Invercargill Area Invercargill the in Walks Short Conditions of Use of Conditions
    W: E: www.icc.govt.nz [email protected] F: P: +64 3 217 5358 217 3 +64 9070 219 3 +64 Queens Park, Invercargill, New Zealand New Invercargill, Park, Queens Makarewa Office Parks Council City Invercargill For further information contact: information further For Lorneville Lorneville - Dacre Rd North Rd contents of this brochure. All material is subject to copyright. copyright. to subject is material All brochure. this of contents Web: www.es.govt.nz Web: for loss, cost or damage whatsoever arising out of or connected with the the with connected or of out arising whatsoever damage or cost loss, for 8 Email: [email protected] Email: responsibility for any error or omission and disclaim liability to any entity entity any to liability disclaim and omission or error any for responsibility West Plains Rd 9 McIvor Rd 5115 211 03 Ph: the agencies involved in the management of these walking tracks accept no no accept tracks walking these of management the in involved agencies the Waikiwi 9840 Invercargill While all due care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of this publication, publication, this of accuracy the ensure to taken been has care due all While Waihopai Bainfield Rd 90116 Bag Private Disclaimer Grasmere Southland Environment 7 10 Rosedale Waverley www.doc.govt.nz Web: Web: www.southerndhb.govt.nz Web: Bay Rd Herbert St Findlay Rd [email protected] Email: Email: [email protected] Email: Avenal Windsor Ph: 03 211 2400 211 03 Ph: Ph: 03 211 0900 211 03 Ph: Queens Dr Glengarry Tay St Invercargill 9840 Invercargill
    [Show full text]
  • App Pendi Ix 5
    Appendix 5 Round the Mountain Cycle Trail – Oreti Valley and Mararoa Valley Route Options – Terrestrial Ecology Report Simon Beale, MWH New Zealand Ltd – September 2014 Tech Time s Round the Mountain Cycle Trail Oreti Valley and Mararoa Valley Route Options Terrestrial Ecology Report Prepared for Southland District Council SEPTEMBER 2014 Southland District Council Round the Mountain Cycle Trail Terrestrial Ecology Report This document has been prepared for the benefit of Southland District Council. No liability is accepted by this company or any employee or sub-consultant of this company with respect to its use by any other person. This disclaimer shall apply notwithstanding that the report may be made available to other persons for an application for permission or approval to fulfil a legal requirement. QUALITY STATEMENT PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT TECHNICAL LEAD Claire Perkins Simon Beale PREPARED BY Simon Beale ………………………………............... 09/09/2014 CHECKED BY ………………………………............... 09/09/2014 Grant Kluyts REVIEWED BY Kristy Hall …………… …………. 09/09/2014 APPROVED FOR ISSUE BY Claire Perkins …………… 09/09/2014 QUEENSTOWN 134a Gorge Rd, Queenstown 9300 PO Box 649, Queenstown 9348 TEL +64 3 450 0890, FAX +64 3 450 0891 REVISION SCHEDULE Rev Signature or Typed Name (documentation on file). Date Description No Prepared by Checked by Reviewed by Approved by Status: Final September 2014 Project number: 80506020 Our ref: Terrestrial Ecology Report Southland District Council Round the Mountain Cycle Trail Terrestrial Ecology Report Southland District
    [Show full text]
  • Application for Resource Consent, Upper Rangitata River
    Application for resource consent, Upper Rangitata River Section 95A of the Resource Management Act 1991 The Ashburton and Timaru District Councils have received the following applications for resource consent: Applicant: Braided River Jet Boating Ltd Address for Service: Ronald Clearwater, Braided River Jet Boating Ltd, 201 Geraldine – Arundel Road, RD22, Geraldine 7922 or by email at [email protected] Application number(s): LUC18/0094 & 102.2108.224 Location: Upper Rangitata River Details of proposed activity: Resource consent is sought to operate a commercial jet boat activity on the Rangitata River. The Rangitata River represents the boundary between the Ashburton and Timaru Districts and as such resource consent has been sought from both Councils. The two Councils are processing the applications as a joint process similarly to as if there was one application. It is proposed to operate a six person jet boat on the river (1 driver plus 5 guests) for up to a maximum of four trips per day with an overall cap of 480 trips per year. The activity will operate during daylight hours (up to a maximum of between 7am and 7pm), seven days a week. The activity will operate on the upper reaches of the Rangitata River and activities will be limited to from the top of the Rangitata Gorge up to the confluence of the Havelock and Clyde rivers. It is noted that the river includes various branches within this area and as part of this the activity will go up to the confluence point but will also travel up another arm of the river up to the Deep Creek area towards Mount Sunday.
    [Show full text]
  • The Glacial Sequences in the Rangitata and Ashburton Valleys, South Island, New Zealand
    ERRATA p. 10, 1.17 for tufts read tuffs p. 68, 1.12 insert the following: c) Meltwater Channel Deposit Member. This member has been mapped at a single locality along the western margin of the Mesopotamia basin. Remnants of seven one-sided meltwater channels are preserved " p. 80, 1.24 should read: "The exposure occurs beneath a small area of undulating ablation moraine." p. 84, 1.17-18 should rea.d: "In the valley of Boundary stream " p. 123, 1.3 insert the following: " landforms of successive ice fluctuations is not continuous over sufficiently large areas." p. 162, 1.6 for patter read pattern p. 166, 1.27 insert the following: " in chapter 11 (p. 95)." p. 175, 1.18 should read: "At 0.3 km to the north is abel t of ablation moraine " p. 194, 1.28 should read: " ... the Burnham Formation extends 2.5 km we(3twards II THE GLACIAL SEQUENCES IN THE RANGITATA AND ASHBURTON VALLEYS, SOUTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geography in the University of Canterbury by M.C.G. Mabin -7 University of Canterbury 1980 i Frontispiece: "YE HORRIBYLE GLACIERS" (Butler 1862) "THE CLYDE GLACIER: Main source Alexander Turnbull Library of the River Clyde (Rangitata)". wellington, N.Z. John Gully, watercolour 44x62 cm. Painted from an ink and water­ colour sketch by J. von Haast. This painting shows the Clyde Glacier in March 1861. It has reached an advanced position just inside the remnant of a slightly older latero-terminal moraine ridge that is visible to the left of the small figure in the middle ground.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglers' Notice for Fish and Game Region Conservation
    ANGLERS’ NOTICE FOR FISH AND GAME REGION CONSERVATION ACT 1987 FRESHWATER FISHERIES REGULATIONS 1983 Pursuant to section 26R(3) of the Conservation Act 1987, the Minister of Conservation approves the following Anglers’ Notice, subject to the First and Second Schedules of this Notice, for the following Fish and Game Region: Southland NOTICE This Notice shall come into force on the 1st day of October 2017. 1. APPLICATION OF THIS NOTICE 1.1 This Anglers’ Notice sets out the conditions under which a current licence holder may fish for sports fish in the area to which the notice relates, being conditions relating to— a.) the size and limit bag for any species of sports fish: b.) any open or closed season in any specified waters in the area, and the sports fish in respect of which they are open or closed: c.) any requirements, restrictions, or prohibitions on fishing tackle, methods, or the use of any gear, equipment, or device: d.) the hours of fishing: e.) the handling, treatment, or disposal of any sports fish. 1.2 This Anglers’ Notice applies to sports fish which include species of trout, salmon and also perch and tench (and rudd in Auckland /Waikato Region only). 1.3 Perch and tench (and rudd in Auckland /Waikato Region only) are also classed as coarse fish in this Notice. 1.4 Within coarse fishing waters (as defined in this Notice) special provisions enable the use of coarse fishing methods that would otherwise be prohibited. 1.5 Outside of coarse fishing waters a current licence holder may fish for coarse fish wherever sports fishing is permitted, subject to the general provisions in this Notice that apply for that region.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Book for Stage 2 Opening Submissions for the Applicants
    Case book for Stage 2 Opening submissions for the Applicants (excluding cases previously provided in Stage 1 case book) 1. Re Draft National Water Conservation (Mataura River) Order C32/90, 4 May 1990 at 39-40 2. Hearing Committee Report on the Te Waihora/Lake Ellesmere amendment order, July 2011 3. Report by the Special Tribunal on the Rangitata River Water Conservation Order Application, October 2002 Rangitata River Water Conservation Order Application Report by the Special Tribunal October 2002 Table of Contents NOTICE TO MINISTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT..........................................i PART I PROCESS ........................................................................................1 The application.........................................................................................................1 Water conservation order legislation .......................................................................2 Accepting the application ........................................................................................2 Tribunal appointment process..................................................................................3 Notification ..............................................................................................................3 Submissions .............................................................................................................4 Pre-hearing conference ............................................................................................5 Range of the tribunal’s inquiry
    [Show full text]
  • Delineation of the Rangitata Riparian Zone
    Delineation of the Rangitata riparian zone Report No. R12/65 ISBN 978-1-927210-92-5 (print) 978-1-927210-97-0 (web) Report prepared for Environment Canterbury by Lee Burbery Lincoln Ventures Limited June 2012 Report R12/65 ISBN 978-1-927210-92-5 (print) ISBN 978-1-927210-97-0 (web) 24 Edward Street, Lincoln PO Box 345 Christchurch 8140 Phone (03) 365 3828 Fax (03) 365 3194 75 Church Street PO Box 550 Timaru 7940 Phone (03) 687 7800 Fax (03) 687 7808 Website: www.ecan.govt.nz Customer Services Phone 0800 324 636 Delineation of the Rangitata Riparian Zone Prepared for Environment Canterbury Report No 1050-9-R1 June 2012 By Lee Burbery Delineation of the Rangitata riparian zone Community Summary A riparian zone aquifer is a groundwater system that is closely related to a surface water body. Water resource management rules within a riparian zone might be tailored differently from rules outside such a zone, to account for the strong surface water/groundwater connection. The riparian aquifer zone of the lower section of the Rangitata River which divides the Mayfield-Hinds groundwater allocation zone (GWAZ) and Rangitata-Orton GWAZ has been delineated based on the review of available geological, hydrological and water chemistry data. The Rangitata riparian aquifer zone is conceived to include both shallow and deep groundwater that underlies the margin of land between the Rangitata River and Kapunatiki Creek (encompassing Rangitata Island and the Rangitata South Branch). The historic flood plain on the north side (true-left) of the Rangitata, directly south of Coldstream, is also considered to be part of the riparian zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Freshwater Ecosystems with Nationally Important Natural Heritage Values: Development of a Biogeographic Framework
    Identifying freshwater ecosystems with nationally important natural heritage values: development of a biogeographic framework J.R. Leathwick, K. Collier and L. Chadderton SCIENCE FOR CONSERVATION 274 Published by Science & Technical Publishing Department of Conservation PO Box 10420, The Terrace Wellington 6143, New Zealand Cover: Ohinemuri River in Karangahake Gorge, Coromandel. Photo: John Leathwick. Science for Conservation is a scientific monograph series presenting research funded by New Zealand Department of Conservation (DOC). Manuscripts are internally and externally peer-reviewed; resulting publications are considered part of the formal international scientific literature. Individual copies are printed, and are also available from the departmental website in pdf form. Titles are listed in our catalogue on the website, refer www.doc.govt.nz under Publications, then Science & technical. © Copyright May 2007, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISSN 1173–2946 ISBN 978–0–478–14207–5 (hardcopy) ISBN 978–0–478–14208–2 (web PDF) This report was prepared for publication by Science & Technical Publishing; editing by Sue Hallas and layout by Lynette Clelland. Publication was approved by the Chief Scientist (Research, Development & Improvement Division), Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand. In the interest of forest conservation, we support paperless electronic publishing. When printing, recycled paper is used wherever possible. ContEnts Abstract 5 1. Introduction 6 1.1 Water-bodies of national importance 6 1.2 Development
    [Show full text]