BUCKS INVERTEBRATE GROUP BULLETIN Number 22

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

BUCKS INVERTEBRATE GROUP BULLETIN Number 22 BUCKS INVERTEBRATE GROUP BULLETIN Number 22 Contents The BIG identification and recording questionnaire: Pages 2 - 5 Martin Harvey Highlights of the season: Loosley Row: Nigel Partridge Pages 6 - 7 Highlights of the season: Ballinger Common: Peter Hall Page 7 Crossocerus congener. A new digger wasp for Bucks: Page 7 - 8 Martin Albertini A parasitoid of cockroach eggs and other Hymenoptera from Pages 8 - 9 Stoke Common: Martin Albertini 2011 A busy mothing year: David Wilton Pages 8 – 18 Sphinginus lobatus. A rare malachite beetle new to Bucks: Page 18 Martin Harvey 2011 Moth Review: Martin Albertini Pages 18 – 23 Field Reports 2011 Pages 23 – 32 Note of Thanks: Peter Hall Page 32 BIG News Number 22 Editor: Peter Hall, Melanthia, Chiltern Rd., Ballinger Common, Bucks HP16 9LH e-mail [email protected] The BIG identification and recording questionnaire Martin Harvey At the end of 2011, BMERC and BIG wanted to find out a bit more about invertebrate recording among members of BIG: who records what, where do the records go and can we encourage more recording? Many thanks to the 41 members who completed the questionnaire, the results of which are summarised below. The questions were compiled by Martin Harvey, Martin Albertini of BIG and Laura Fennell of BMERC. With hindsight some of the questions could have been made clearer and some of the answers were rather hard to analyse. However, the responses have been interesting and useful. Which invertebrate groups do you feel confident about identifying? Unsurprisingly butterflies and moths were the clear front-runners, but for many other groups members are happy identifying at least some species. There was also an “Other invertebrates” category that included woodlice, millipedes and centipedes, aquatic invertebrates, nocturnal parasitic Hymenoptera, lacewings and rotifers. Which invertebrate groups do you record in Buckinghamshire? ~ 2 ~ BIG News Number 22 Editor: Peter Hall, Melanthia, Chiltern Rd., Ballinger Common, Bucks HP16 9LH e-mail [email protected] Butterflies and moths are again the clear winners, but a wide range of other groups get recorded to a lesser extent. This question also asked which groups people took photos of and/or kept voucher specimens (but it is not clear from our question how many of these represent sightings that are photographed but not made into biological records): Looking at these first two questions, there is some drop from the number of people who can identify the various groups to the number that record them: ~ 3 ~ BIG News Number 22 Editor: Peter Hall, Melanthia, Chiltern Rd., Ballinger Common, Bucks HP16 9LH e-mail [email protected] How do you store your records? Most people (almost 70%) use a notebook but nearly 60% use a computer database and nearly 40% use a spreadsheet (you could tick more than one box here and some use all three). Of the people using databases MapMate is the most widely used, but Recorder and Levana were also mentioned by more than one person. What happens to your records? ~ 4 ~ BIG News Number 22 Editor: Peter Hall, Melanthia, Chiltern Rd., Ballinger Common, Bucks HP16 9LH e-mail [email protected] This question is complicated by the fact that many people send their records to more than one place, but it is clear that BMERC is playing an important role in collecting records for groups that have no county recording scheme and in many cases receiving records that are not otherwise being passed on to national recording schemes. We had hoped to get an idea of how many records are being made that are not passed on to any recording scheme but our questionnaire design didn’t really achieve that. However, it is encouraging to see that the total number of people passing on records for each group is close to the total number of people who record that group, Would any of the following help you record more, or encourage you to start? Targeted surveys are clearly an attractive idea for members of BIG and that’s certainly something we can try to develop in the future – if anyone has any ideas or would like to take on a targeted survey please do get in touch. With BMERC’s help, we have occasionally run identification training courses in the past and that is also something we can try to do again. As for field meetings, we already do quite a lot of those, so if you are one of the people who said that these would help you record more please do come along to as many field meetings as you wish! As ever, ideas for future field meetings and offers to lead them are welcome. Among the “other comments” for this question, a large proportion of respondents said that the main thing that constrains their recording activity is simply lack of time. I’m not sure BIG can do much to remove that constraint, but it is good to know that recording invertebrates is something people would like to do more of if they could! ~ 5 ~ BIG News Number 22 Editor: Peter Hall, Melanthia, Chiltern Rd., Ballinger Common, Bucks HP16 9LH e-mail [email protected] Highlights of the season: Loosley Row Nigel Partridge The number of moth species found in my garden broke through the 500 mark this year, including the 34 new additions listed below. B&F # Species Name 2011 Date 0125 Emmetia marginea 27th June 0332a Phyllonorycter 29th May leucographella 0409a Argyresthia trifasciata 10th June 0422 Argyresthia albistria 19th June 0451 Ypsolopha mucronella 24th Feb 0765 Teleiodes vulgella 26th June 0779 Bryotropha affinis 29th May 0861 Acompsia schmidtiellus 1st Aug 0905 Blastodacna hellerella 26th June 0936 Cochylimorpha 8th May straminea 0946 Aethes rubigana 10th July 0964 Cochylis dubitana 14th July 0987 Ptycholomoides 26th June aeriferanus 1134 Epinotia ramella 12th Aug Acompsia schmidtiellus (Photo: © Nigel Partridge) 1245 Grapholita janthinana 27th July 1273 Dichrorampha petiverella 11th July 1358 Evergestis pallidata 30th July 1365 Pyrausta despicata 2nd Sept 1398 Nomophila noctuella 15th Sept 1425 Galleria mellonella 2nd Sept 1465 Nephopterix angustella 30th Sept 1474 Ephestia parasitella 13th June 1659 Yellow Horned 21st March 1790 The Tissue 8th April 1840 Shaded Pug 29th May 1857 Dwarf Pug 22nd April 1997 Sallow Kitten 30th April 2105 Dotted Rustic 2nd June 2131 Square-spotted Clay 12th Aug 2171 Marbled Coronet 11th June 2179 Pine Beauty 28th March 2305 Small Angle Shades 29th June 2345 Small Dotted Buff 13th july 2375 Large Wainscot 4th Oct I recorded five examples of Dichrorampha petiverella, all of which were found on, or around a small patch of Yarrow (Achillea millefolium) in the late afternoon. It is Dotted Rustic (Photo: © Nigel Partridge) obviously a plant to keep an eye on. Further noteworthy site records included the The single Acompsia schmidtiellus was following: attracted to the outside light, as were another • 1 Cream Wave – 8th May six of the new additions to the garden list. The • 2 Blue-bordered Carpets – 13 and 29 June others were caught in a Skinner actinic trap. ~ 6 ~ BIG News Number 22 Editor: Peter Hall, Melanthia, Chiltern Rd., Ballinger Common, Bucks HP16 9LH e-mail [email protected] • 1 Scarlet Tiger – 15 June (found inside the Pseudatemelia josephinae, Depressaria sordidatella, shed) Scrobipalpa acuminatella, Batrachedra • 1 Aglossa pinguinalis – 11 July praeangustana, Blastodacna atra, Archips • 1 Toadflax Pug – 19 July crataegana, Capua vulgana, Cydia funebrana, • 1 Ypsolopha nemorella – 24 July Eudonia angustea, Lappet, May Highflyer and Large Wainscot. This brings the grand total of moth • 3 Waved Blacks – 29 July, 31 July and 5 species for the garden to 724. August • 1 Beech-green Carpet – 17 August Macro species that had a particularly good year were Brown-spot Pinion, Double Square-spot, Feathered Gothic, Heart and Dart, Large Nutmeg, Lunar Underwing, Riband Wave and Small Quaker. The micros Agriphila geniculea and Pseudargyrotoza conwagana were noticeably more numerous than in previous years. Depressaria sordidatella male genitalia (Photo: © Peter Hall) However, species that were sadly missing altogether were Dusky Sallow, Lime Hawk- moth, Red Chestnut, Small Square-spot, Small Crossocerus congener (Dahlbom, 1845): Waved Umber, Spectacle and White-spotted a new digger wasp for Bucks Pug. Although I have never recorded large numbers of any of these, I usually see a few of Martin Albertini each. This species was added to the British list Perhaps the biggest surprise of all was my last following the discovery of a specimen at record for the year on New Year’s Eve, when I Croxley Common, Rickmansworth, Herts discovered a Large Nutmeg below the outside (TQ09) by Raymond Uffen in 1999. It was with light. I couldn’t quite believe it because the the common Crossocerus podagricus entering normal flight time is mid-May to late July and beetle holes in a dead cherry tree. Notes on wondered if the wine had got the better of me. further records to 2008 include 3 more Herts Thanks to Peter Hall for his help with many sites, slightly East of the original, and a site in identifications throughout 2011. Surrey with all records being of females. During the BIG meeting at Denham Marsh Wood (TQ0188) on 26 July 2008 I collected Highlights of the season: three small black wasps around dead branches. Ballinger Common One turned out to be Rhopalum clavipes, but I wasn’t able to satisfactorily key out the other Peter Hall two, both females. I recently passed these to Matt Smith who identified them as Crossocerus Moth trapping sessions in the garden were congener. They appear to be the first Bucks reduced this season. However, there was still time records and are from the 10km square to add a few more to the overall lisiting for the site.
Recommended publications
  • Moths in Pheromone Traps for Anarsia Lineatella Zll
    372 Acta Zoologica Lituanica, 2001, Volumen 11, Numerus 4 ISSN 1392-1657 MOTHS IN PHEROMONE TRAPS FOR ANARSIA LINEATELLA ZLL. AND PHTHORIMAEA OPERCULELLA ZLL. (GELECHIIDAE, LEPIDOP- TERA) IN LITHUANIA Henrikas OSTRAUSKAS Lithuanian State Plant Protection Service, Pelesos 85, 2014 Vilnius, Lithuania Abstract. During the 19972000 investigations the quarantine pest Phthorimaea operculella was not registered in Lithuania. During the studies undertaken in 19982000 Anarsia lineatella was caught in four new localities of two new districts Utena and Panevëþys. Moths belonging to 94 species from 17 families were caught with pheromone traps for P. operculella and A. lineatella, with species rare for Lithuania among them (Calybites phasianipennella, Phyllonorycter corylifoliella, Coleophora ibipennella, Scrobipalpa acuminatella, Scrobipalpa artemisiella, Ypsolopha horridella, Synanthedon myopaeformis, Pammene spiniana, Cydia lunulana, Cydia orobana, Mesapamea secalella, Hypena rostralis). As a result of the above studies the names of moths most frequently caught with A. lineatella and P. operculella pheromone traps have been elucidated. Also some new localities for the other nine moth species in Lithuania have been additionally distinguished and adduced in the present study. Key words: peach twig borer, Anarsia lineatella, potato tuber moth, Phthorimaea operculella, pheromone traps, distribution, Lithuania INTRODUCTION sticky inserts for A. lineatella and for P. operculella; d) Funnel traps with moth killing strips for the potato tuber Anarsia lineatella is a rare for Lithuania moth species moth. In 2000 dispensers (ANLI) and Delta traps with which was entered into the European quarantine pest sticky inserts produced by Pherobank firm (Netherlands) list (Quarantine, 1997) and in the Checklist of were used for A. lineatella trapping. The pheromone Lithuanian Lepidoptera (Ivinskis, 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • How Do Lepidopteran Seasonal Guilds Differ on Some Oaks (Quercus Spp.) – a Case Study
    JOURNAL OF FOREST SCIENCE, 55, 2009 (12): 578–590 How do lepidopteran seasonal guilds differ on some oaks (Quercus spp.) – A case study † M. Turčáni1, J. Patočka1 , M. Kulfan2 1 Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic 2Department of Zoology, Comenius University, Mlynská dolina, Bratislava, Slovakia ABSTRACT: The differences between oak lepidopteran communities were studied in Slovakia in 1993 and 1994. Sampling was undertaken between April and October on 3 oak species (Quercus robur, Q. petraea, Q. rubra). Biologi- cal traits of larvae were examined in order to explain differences in seasonal guilds among oaks. Communities varied in structure and abundance. Species richness in four seasonal guilds (flush, late spring, summer and autumn feeders) had a similar pattern on each of the studied oak species. The guild of flush feeders had the richest species assemblage, followed by the late spring feeder guild and both guilds were significantly richer than the summer feeder guild and autumn feeder guild. Keywords: lepidopteran larvae communities; Slovakia; oaks; seasonal guilds Oaks (Quercus spp.) are represented in Slovakia dant defoliators: Lymantria dispar, Operophtera (Central Europe) by eight native and one introduced brumata, Erannis defoliaria, Tortrix viridana, Aleim- species; they are distributed in the warmest part ma loeflingiana, Archips xylosteana and several of the country from an altitude of about 100 m up others. The occurrence of outbreaks was used as an to 1,000 m a.s.l. More than 250 lepidopteran spe- indicator of habitat preference (the outbreak is de- cies have been recorded feeding on Quercus spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Surveys at Hunsbury Hill Country Park 2018
    FRIENDS OF WEST HUNSBURY PARKS BIOLOGICAL SURVEYS AT HUNSBURY HILL COUNTRY PARK 2018 Ryan Clark Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre April 2019 Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre Introduction Biological records tell us which species are present on sites and are essential in informing the conservation and management of wildlife. In 2018, the Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre ran a number of events to encourage biological recording at Hunsbury Hill Fort as part of the Friends of West Hunsbury Park’s project, which is supported by the National Lottery Heritage Fund. Hunsbury Hill Country Park is designated as a Local Wildlife Site (LWS). There are approximately 700 Local Wildlife Sites in Northamptonshire. Local Wildlife Sites create a network of areas, which are important as refuges for wildlife or wildlife corridors. Hunsbury Hill Country Park was designated as a LWS in 1992 for its woodland flora and the variety of habitats that the site possesses. The site also has a Local Geological Site (LGS) which highlights the importance of this site for its geology as well as biodiversity. This will be surveyed by the local geological group in due course. Hunsbury Hill Country Park Local Wildlife Site Boundary 1 Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre (NBRC) supports the recording, curation and sharing of quality verified environmental information for sound decision-making. We hold nearly a million biological records covering a variety of different species groups. Before the start of this project, we looked to see which species had been recorded at the site. We were surprised to find that the only records we have for the site have come from Local Wildlife Site Surveys, which assess the quality of the site and focus on vascular plants, with some casual observations of other species noted too.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus, 19(5) 2020, 129–142 https://czasopisma.up.lublin.pl/index.php/asphc ISSN 1644-0692 e-ISSN 2545-1405 DOI: 10.24326/asphc.2020.5.13 ORIGINAL PAPER Accepted: 28.11.2019 THE EFFECT OF VEGETATION IN APPLE ORCHARD EDGES ON THE PHENOLOGY OF PARASITOIDS FROM THE SUBFAMILY Pimplinae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) Hanna Piekarska-Boniecka1, Joanna Zyprych-Walczak2 , Idzi Siatkowski2, Tadeusz Barczak3 1 Department of Entomology and Environmental Protection, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Dąbrowskiego 159, 60-594 Poznań, Poland 2 Department of Mathematical and Statistical Methods, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznań, Poland 3 Department of Biology and Animal Environment, University of Science and Technology in Bydgoszcz, Hetmańska 33, 85-039 Bydgoszcz, Poland ABSTRACT Wild vegetation neighbouring orchards may be a factor attracting imagines of parasitoids from the subfam- ily Pimplinae into fruit tree plantations and thus increase both their species diversity and population size in this habitat. For this reason in the years 2008–2010 a study was initiated on the phenology of 8 dominant Pimplinae species in apple orchards and on their edges, which included shrubberies and roadside avenues of trees and shrubs. Slightly higher numbers of Pimplinae were recorded in orchards compared to their edges. At strong correlation was observed between the counts of Pimplinae in both habitats. The preference of selec- tion of orchards by Pimplinae was observed in the autumn period, while no such preference was found in the spring or summer months. Analyses showed that flowering plants in the orchard edges such asTilia cordata, Symphoricarpos albus, Cirsium arvense and Galium aparine may have attracted Pimplinae to the orchards.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Fauna of Casebearers from the Centre of the European Part of Russia (Lepidoptera, Coleophoridae) by V a S S Il Y V
    Atalanta (Juli 2004) 35(1/2): 133-140, Wurzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 On the fauna of casebearers from the centre of the European part of Russia (Lepidoptera, Coleophoridae) by V a s s il y V. A n ik in & Ir in a V. S h m yto v a received 30.1.2004 Abstract: 47 species of the casebearers (Lepidoptera, Coleophoridae) are recorded from the centre of the European part of Russia. The first investigation in the Lepidoptera from the centre of the European part of Russia was made about 200 years ago. Inspite of it the fauna of Coleophoridae of this territory still has been almost completely unknown until present time. In the course of our study, collections were made from 1984 to 1999 in some parts of Kaluga, Smolensk, Oryel provinces (I. V. Shmytova leg.) and Tula province (L. V. Bolshakov, C. A. Rjabov, A. F. Lakomov leg.). This territory is mainly composed of forest as well as forest-steppe zones (fig. 1). Kaluga, Smolensk and some regions of Tula provinces are typical for the occurence of coniferous (Picea abies (L.) Karst.), broad-leaved (Quercus robur L., Ulmus L, Tilia cordata Mill., Fraxinus excel­ sior L.) and small-leaved forests (Betula L., Populus tremula L., Alnus Mill., Salix L.). Pines (Pinus sylvestris L.) are spread here on the sandy lands. The elements of steppe flora are met mainly in Tula and Oryel provinces, but along the valleys of rivers they penetrate to the north and north-west. It consists of species of Festuca L., Koeleria Pers., Stipa L., Phleum L., Flelictitrichon Bess., Poa L., Ranunculus L, Galium L., Anem­ one L., Salvia L.
    [Show full text]
  • Амурский Зоологический Журнал Amurian Zoological Journal
    Амурский зоологический журнал Amurian zoological journal Том VIII. № 1 Март 2016 Vol. VIII. No 1 March 2016 Амурский зоологический журнал ISSN 1999-4079 Рег. свидетельство ПИ № ФС77-31529 Amurian zoological journal Том VIII. № 1. Vol. VIII. № 1. Март 2016 www.bgpu.ru/azj/ March 2016 РЕДАКЦИОННАЯ КОЛЛЕГИЯ EDITORIAL BOARD Главный редактор Editor-in-chief Член-корреспондент РАН, д.б.н. Б.А. Воронов Corresponding Member of R A S, Dr. Sc. Boris A. Voronov к.б.н. А.А. Барбарич (отв. секретарь) Dr. Alexandr A. Barbarich (exec. secretary) к.б.н. Ю. Н. Глущенко Dr. Yuri N. Glushchenko д.б.н. В. В. Дубатолов Dr. Sc. Vladimir V. Dubatolov д.н. Ю. Кодзима Dr. Sc. Junichi Kojima к.б.н. О. Э. Костерин Dr. Oleg E. Kosterin д.б.н. А. А. Легалов Dr. Sc. Andrei A. Legalov д.б.н. А. С. Лелей Dr. Sc. Arkadiy S. Lelej к.б.н. Е. И. Маликова Dr. Elena I. Malikova д.б.н. В. А. Нестеренко Dr. Sc. Vladimir A. Nesterenko д.б.н. М. Г. Пономаренко Dr. Sc. Margarita G. Ponomarenko к.б.н. Л.А. Прозорова Dr. Larisa A. Prozorova д.б.н. Н. А. Рябинин Dr. Sc. Nikolai A. Rjabinin д.б.н. М. Г. Сергеев Dr. Sc. Michael G. Sergeev д.б.н. С. Ю. Синев Dr. Sc. Sergei Yu. Sinev д.б.н. В.В. Тахтеев Dr. Sc. Vadim V. Takhteev д.б.н. И.В. Фефелов Dr. Sc. Igor V. Fefelov д.б.н. А.В. Чернышев Dr. Sc. Alexei V. Chernyshev к.б.н.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Phylogeny of Leafmining Ectoedemia Moths (Lepidoptera: Nepticulidae): Host Plant Family Shifts and Allopatry As Drivers of Speciation
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) A global phylogeny of leafmining Ectoedemia moths (Lepidoptera: Nepticulidae): host plant family shifts and allopatry as drivers of speciation Doorenweerd, C.; van Nieukerken, E.J.; Menken, S.B.J. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0119586 Publication date 2015 Document Version Final published version Published in PLoS ONE License CC BY Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Doorenweerd, C., van Nieukerken, E. J., & Menken, S. B. J. (2015). A global phylogeny of leafmining Ectoedemia moths (Lepidoptera: Nepticulidae): host plant family shifts and allopatry as drivers of speciation. PLoS ONE, 10(3), [e0119586]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119586 General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:28 Sep 2021 RESEARCH ARTICLE A Global Phylogeny of Leafmining Ectoedemia Moths (Lepidoptera: Nepticulidae): Exploring Host Plant Family Shifts and Allopatry as Drivers of Speciation Camiel Doorenweerd1,2*, Erik J.
    [Show full text]
  • Laajan Lajinsisäisen DNA-Viivakoodimuuntelun Esiintyvyys Ja Syyt Perhosilla Jonna Autto
    Laajan lajinsisäisen DNA-viivakoodimuuntelun esiintyvyys ja syyt perhosilla Jonna Autto PRO GRADU-TUTKIELMA OULUN YLIOPISTO BIOLOGIAN TUTKINTO-OHJELMA KEVÄT 2018 Sisällysluettelo 1. Johdanto .................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.2. DNA-viivakoodit lajintunnistuksessa ja -rajaamisessa ......................................................................... 5 1.3. DNA-viivakoodaukseen liittyvät ongelmat........................................................................................ 10 1.3.1. Laaja lajinsisäinen DNA-viivakoodimuuntelu ............................................................................. 12 1.4. Perhoset .......................................................................................................................................... 18 1.5. Tutkimuksen tavoitteet ................................................................................................................... 19 2. Aineisto ja menetelmät .......................................................................................................................... 20 2.1. Aineiston kokoaminen ..................................................................................................................... 20 2.2. DNA:n eristys ja sekvensointi ........................................................................................................... 23 2.3. Analyysit .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Moth Surveys 2020
    Table of Contents Introduction 2 Visit 1 – 20th May, 2020 2 Visit 2 – 15th June, 2020 3 Visit 3 – 14th July, 2020 4 Visit 4 – 8th August, 2020 5 Visit 5 – 8th September, 2020 6 Visit 6 – 10th November, 2020 7 Summary 8 Acknowledgements 8 Appendix I – Recording Details 8 Appendix II – The Complete List 2020 8 Appendix III – National Status & Foodplants 15 Appendix IV – Other Wildlife Recorded During Survey 21 Some Photos From Sun Rising 2020 22 Cover Photo: 2064 (72.024) Ruby Tiger (Phragmatobia fuliginosa) 8th September, 2020 All photos in this report taken at Sun Rising by A. Prior © 2020 1 Sun Rising NBG Moth Surveys 2020 Introduction After the atrocious weather experienced going back to the last couple of months of 2019 it seems miraculous that six visits were made to Sun Rising during 2020. Throw in a frustrating global virus and it is even more so! Most were arranged at very short notice to take advantage of whatever decent weather was on offer. There were a couple of breezy nights, but they were mild enough to make them worthwhile and all were productive with additions of new species to further lengthen the site list. Visit 1 – 20th May, 2020 The weather finally relented towards the end of May and after all that had gone on earlier in the year it was decided that Martin Kennard and I should use this as a “test” night to see if we could carry on moth recording safely. Neither of us thought there should be any problem with that as by the very nature of moth recording we are widely separated.
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkhill Green Spaces Wildlife Species List
    Yorkhill Green Spaces Wildlife Species List April 2021 update Yorkhill Green Spaces Species list Draft list of animals, plants, fungi, mosses and lichens recorded from Yorkhill, Glasgow. Main sites: Yorkhill Park, Overnewton Park and Kelvinhaugh Park (AKA Cherry Park). Other recorded sites: bank of River Kelvin at Bunhouse Rd/ Old Dumbarton Rd, Clyde Expressway path, casual records from streets and gardens in Yorkhill. Species total: 711 Vertebrates: Amhibians:1, Birds: 57, Fish: 7, Mammals (wild): 15 Invertebrates: Amphipods: 1, Ants: 3, Bees: 26, Beetles: 21, Butterflies: 11, Caddisflies: 2, Centipedes: 3, Earthworms: 2, Earwig: 1, Flatworms: 1, Flies: 61, Grasshoppers: 1, Harvestmen: 2, Lacewings: 2, Mayflies: 2, Mites: 4, Millipedes: 3, Moths: 149, True bugs: 13, Slugs & snails: 21, Spiders: 14, Springtails: 2, Wasps: 13, Woodlice: 5 Plants: Flowering plants: 174, Ferns: 5, Grasses: 13, Horsetail: 1, Liverworts: 7, Mosses:17, Trees: 19 Fungi and lichens: Fungi: 24, Lichens: 10 Conservation Status: NameSBL - Scottish Biodiversity List Priority Species Birds of Conservation Concern - Red List, Amber List Last Common name Species Taxon Record Common toad Bufo bufo amphiban 2012 Australian landhopper Arcitalitrus dorrieni amphipod 2021 Black garden ant Lasius niger ant 2020 Red ant Myrmica rubra ant 2021 Red ant Myrmica ruginodis ant 2014 Buff-tailed bumblebee Bombus terrestris bee 2021 Garden bumblebee Bombus hortorum bee 2020 Tree bumblebee Bombus hypnorum bee 2021 Heath bumblebee Bombus jonellus bee 2020 Red-tailed bumblebee Bombus
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) from Mt
    Accepted Manuscript Tortricinae (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) from Mt. Changbai-shan, China Kyu-Tek Park, Bong-Woo Lee, Yang-Seop Bae, Hui-Lin Han, Bong-Kyu Byun PII: S2287-884X(14)00025-9 DOI: 10.1016/j.japb.2014.04.007 Reference: JAPB 19 To appear in: Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity Received Date: 28 February 2014 Revised Date: 13 March 2014 Accepted Date: 4 April 2014 Please cite this article as: Park K-T, Lee B-W, Bae Y-S, Han H-L, Byun B-K, Tortricinae (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) from Mt. Changbai-shan, China, Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity (2014), doi: 10.1016/ j.japb.2014.04.007. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT J. of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity Tortricinae (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) from Mt. Changbai-shan, China Kyu-Tek Park a, Bong-Woo Lee b, Yang-Seop Bae c, Hui-Lin Han d, Bong-Kyu Byun e* a The Korean Academy of Science and Technology, Seongnam, 463-808, Korea b Division of Forest Biodiversity, Korea National Arboretum, Sumokwokgil, Pocheon, 487-821, Korea c Division of Life Sciences, University of Incheon, 12-1 Songdo-dong, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, 406-772, Korea dSchool of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, 150040, P.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Tortricinae) and Evolutionary Correlates of Novel Secondary Sexual Structures
    Zootaxa 3729 (1): 001–062 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3729.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CA0C1355-FF3E-4C67-8F48-544B2166AF2A ZOOTAXA 3729 Phylogeny of the tribe Archipini (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Tortricinae) and evolutionary correlates of novel secondary sexual structures JASON J. DOMBROSKIE1,2,3 & FELIX A. H. SPERLING2 1Cornell University, Comstock Hall, Department of Entomology, Ithaca, NY, USA, 14853-2601. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, T6G 2E9 3Corresponding author Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by J. Brown: 2 Sept. 2013; published: 25 Oct. 2013 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 JASON J. DOMBROSKIE & FELIX A. H. SPERLING Phylogeny of the tribe Archipini (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Tortricinae) and evolutionary correlates of novel secondary sexual structures (Zootaxa 3729) 62 pp.; 30 cm. 25 Oct. 2013 ISBN 978-1-77557-288-6 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-77557-289-3 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2013 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2013 Magnolia Press 2 · Zootaxa 3729 (1) © 2013 Magnolia Press DOMBROSKIE & SPERLING Table of contents Abstract . 3 Material and methods . 6 Results . 18 Discussion . 23 Conclusions . 33 Acknowledgements . 33 Literature cited . 34 APPENDIX 1. 38 APPENDIX 2. 44 Additional References for Appendices 1 & 2 . 49 APPENDIX 3. 51 APPENDIX 4. 52 APPENDIX 5.
    [Show full text]