Ipweaq Annual Conference 2019 Handbook
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Santos GLNG Gas Field Development Project
Enter Go back to contents V. SOCIAL V Social Social impact assessment report Santos GLNG Gas Field Development Project AUGUST 2014 Prepared for Santos GLNG Level 22, Santos Place 32 Turbot Street Brisbane QLD 4000 42627287 Santos GLNG Gas Field Development Project - Social impact assessment report Project Manager: URS Australia Pty Ltd Rob Storrs Level 17, 240 Queen Street Principal Brisbane, QLD 4000 GPO Box 302, QLD 4001 Principal-In-Charge: Australia T: 61 7 3243 2111 F: 61 7 3243 2199 Chris Pigott Senior Principal Author: Pat Vidler Senior Associate Reviewer: Date: August 2014 Reference: 42627287/SIA/2 Status: Final Elisha Keighley Senior Environmental Engineer No use of the contents, concepts, designs, drawings, specifications, plans etc. included in this report is permitted unless and until they are the subject of a written contract between URS Australia and the addressee of this report. URS Australia accepts no liability of any kind for any unauthorised use of the contents of this report and URS Australia reserves the right to seek compensation for any such unauthorised use. Document delivery URS Australia provides this document in either printed format, electronic format or both. URS Australia considers the printed version to be binding. The electronic format is provided for the client’s convenience and URS Australia requests that the client ensures the integrity of this electronic information is maintained. Storage of this electronic information should at a minimum comply with the requirements of the Electronic Transactions Act 2000 (Cth). \\ursapac.local\dfs-jobs\BNE\42627287\5 Works\05 EIS Technical Studies\23. Appendix V - Social\14 Post Adequacy\Santos_GLNG_GFD_Project_EIS_Appendix_V_Social _URS Draft_clean.docx i Santos GLNG Gas Field Development Project - Social impact assessment report Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ -
Legislative Assembly Hansard 1960
Queensland Parliamentary Debates [Hansard] Legislative Assembly THURSDAY, 10 NOVEMBER 1960 Electronic reproduction of original hardcopy 1344 Auctioneers, Real Estate, &c., Bill [ASSEMBLY] Questions THURSDAY, 10 NOVEMBER, 1960 Mr. SPEAKER (Hon. D. E. Nicholson, Murrumba) took the chair at 11 a.m. QUESTIONS INCREASES IN BRISBANE MEAT PRICES Mr. LLOYD (Kedron) asked the Minister for Agriculture and Forestry- "(!) Has his attention been drawn to what is apparently a deliberately misleading opinion in the 'Telegraph' of Tuesday, November 8, which attempts to place the responsibility for the seven pence increase in meat prices in Brisbane on the control over the supply of meat in the metropolitan area by the Brisbane Abattoir?" "(2) Is it not a fact that the Cannon Hill Saleyards are merely a facility placed at the disposal of the buyers and sellers of cattle and the Queensland Meat Industry Board has nothing to do with the prices paid for the cattle sold at the Saleyards?" "(3) Would it not be true to state that the only affect that the operations of the Brisbane Abattoir have on the price of meat to the Brisbane housewife is the charge per head imposed on the slaugh tering of cattle owned by meat companies and individual buyers?" "(4) For the correct information of the Brisbane public, will he outline the charges made for the slaughtering of cattle at the Brisbane Abattoir?" "(5) How do these charges compare with those imposed by other abattoirs?" Questions [10 NOVEMBER] Questions 1345 "(6) Has there been any recent increase Cannon Hill have had no influence on in the slaughtering charges levied at the recent rises in meat prices. -
Connecting Brisbane © State of Queensland, June 2017
Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning Connecting Brisbane © State of Queensland, June 2017. Published by the Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning, 1 William Street, Brisbane Qld 4000, Australia. Licence: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 Australia Licence. In essence, you are free to copy and distribute this material in any format, as long as you attribute the work to the State Of Queensland (Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning) and indicate if any changes have been made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Attribution: The State of Queensland, Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of information. However, copyright protects this publication. The State of Queensland has no objection to this material being reproduced, made available online or electronically but only if it is recognised as the owner of the copyright and this material remains unaltered. The Queensland Government is committed to providing accessible services to Queenslanders of all cultural and linguistic backgrounds. If you have diffi culty understanding this publication and need a translator, please call the Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS National) on 131 450 and ask them to telephone the Queensland Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning on 13 QGOV (13 74 68). Disclaimer: While every care has been taken in preparing this publication, the State of Queensland accepts no responsibility for decisions or actions taken as a result of any data, information, statement or advice, expressed or implied, contained within. -
Public Transport in SEQ Options to Deliver Value and Innovation in Future South East
Council ol Mayors South E<1Rt Queensland Public Transport in SEQ Options to deliver value and innovation in future South East Queensland public transport infrastructure January 2012 5 w -(/) u c ::J u0 GHD was commissioned by the Council This report not only develops a list of of Mayors (SEQ) to provide advice on priority projects, but proposes a new innovative and value for money options for vision for SEQ Public Transport that puts investment in the public transport network the commuter at the heart of the system. in South East Queensland (SEQ). It is being released to encourage public discussion about options for investing in A key challenge for the investment public transport infrastructure across SEQ. program for public transport infrastructure in SEQ is how to meet the needs of The report does not represent an endorsed a growing region within the financially policy position of the Council of Mayors constrained fiscal environment now faced (SEQ). which will not consider the report by all levels of government. and public reactions to it until after the 2012 local government elections. The A key concern is whether the funds exist Council of Mayors (SEQ) will consider to proceed with the State Government's all options in developing its future input iconic $7700M Cross River Rail project. into the next iteration of the Queensland Some SEQ Councils are concerned Infrastructure Plan. that funding the project may delay other important projects in the region, while The Council of Mayors (SEQ) looks forward failure to deliver the project may stymie to further developing a constructive growth of the regional rail network. -
24.11.06 Gazette Cover.Fm
QueenslandQueensland Government Government Gazette Gazette PP 451207100087 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ISSN 0155-9370 Vol. 343] FRIDAY, 24 NOVEMBER, 2006 Voted Australia's No. 1 Recruiter* *Human Capital Magazine, Oct 2006 Our public sector specialists understand the unique needs of this Public sector and can help lead your workforce into the future. The understanding and knowledge we’ve gained from being a preferred supplier of recruitment services to government and other Sector public organisations in Queensland and across Australia for over 4 years and 10 years respectively, means you can rest assured that we have the experience required to help you attract and retain the Specialists best talent for a whole range of specialist government roles. Our public sector specialist consultants have worked within government and provided recruitment services across a broad range of positions, including: > Accounting > Executive > Human Resources > Legal > Office Support > Sales & Marketing We know what it’s like to walk in your shoes and we look forward to working with you. Contact us today on 07 3220 3633 or visit www.linkrecruitment.com.au Accounting: Tarnya Lowe, [email protected] Legal & Policy: Rachel Morton, [email protected] Office Support/Human Resources/Sales & Marketing: Bree Jolley, [email protected] Queensland Government Account Manager/Executive: Rebecca Beling, [email protected] Brisbane Office: Level 13, 255 Adelaide St, Brisbane Tel: 07 3220 3633 [1329] Queensland Government Gazette -
Public Transport in SEQ Options to Deliver Value and Innovation in Future South East
Public Transport in SEQ Options to deliver value and innovation in future South East Queensland public transport infrastructure January 2012 A research report by GHD for the Council of Mayors (SEQ) GHD was commissioned by the Council This report not only develops a list of of Mayors (SEQ) to provide advice on priority projects, but proposes a new innovative and value for money options for vision for SEQ Public Transport that puts investment in the public transport network the commuter at the heart of the system. in South East Queensland (SEQ). It is being released to encourage public discussion about options for investing in A key challenge for the investment public transport infrastructure across SEQ. program for public transport infrastructure in SEQ is how to meet the needs of The report does not represent an endorsed a growing region within the nancially policy position of the Council of Mayors constrained scal environment now faced (SEQ), which will not consider the report by all levels of government. and public reactions to it until after the 2012 local government elections. The A key concern is whether the funds exist Council of Mayors (SEQ) will consider to proceed with the State Government’s all options in developing its future input iconic $7700M Cross River Rail project. into the next iteration of the Queensland Some SEQ Councils are concerned Infrastructure Plan. that funding the project may delay other important projects in the region, while The Council of Mayors (SEQ) looks forward failure to deliver the project may stymie to further developing a constructive growth of the regional rail network. -
The Renaissance of Light Rail
The Renaissance of Light Rail Research Paper APRIL 2021 Contents 3 Executive Summary 04 1 Introduction 08 1.1 Context 08 1.2 Scope 09 2 Comparing Typical Transport Modes 11 2.1 Modal Context 12 2.1.1 Bus Rapid Transit 12 2.1.2 Trolleybuses and Electric Bus Rapid Transit 14 2.1.3 Trackless Trams 15 2.1.4 Light Rail 18 3 Light Rail Deep Dive 19 3.1 Benefits 20 Economic 20 Social 22 Environmental 23 3.2 Challenges 26 4 Decision Making Framework 29 4.1 Modal Comparison 30 4.2 Framework 32 4.3 Findings 33 4.4 Applying the framework to recent project proposals 34 4.5 Policy Recommendations 41 Tables Table 1: A Comparison of the Typical Transport Modes 30 Table 2: Case Study – Gold Coast Light Rail 46 Table 3: Case Study – CBD & South East Light Rail 50 Table 4: Case Study – Parramatta Light Rail: PLRS1 percentage uplift analysis 52 Figures Figure 1: Decision Making Framework 06 Figure 2: BRT network in Quito, Ecuador 12 Renaissance of Light Rail Report Figure 3: Brisbane Metro 13 Figure 4: Trackless Tram in the city of Zhuzhou 15 Figure 5: Trams run along George St outside Townhall in the 1950s 18 Figure 6: Light rail vehicle moving north along George Street, Sydney 18 Figure 7: Gold Coast Light Rail Route Alignment Map 46 Figure 8: Sydney CBD and South East Light Rail Route Alignment Map 49 Figure 9: George Street Before and After the CSELR 51 Figure 10: Modelled Percent Uplift from Additional Density (R2, R3 & R4 zones, per Additional Dwellings) 53 Australasian Rail Association / 4 Urban renewal/land value uplift - ability to generate some -
Legislative Assembly Hansard 1987
Queensland Parliamentary Debates [Hansard] Legislative Assembly TUESDAY, 7 APRIL 1987 Electronic reproduction of original hardcopy Ministerial Statement 7 April 1987 1293 TUESDAY, 7 APRIL 1987 Mr SPEAKER (Hon. K. R. Lingard, Fassifern) read prayers and took the chair at 10 a.m. PAPERS The following paper was laid on the table, and ordered to be printed— Report— Queensland National Parks and Wildlife Service for the year ended 30 June 1986. The following papers were laid on the table— Proclamations under— Universities and Colleges (Higher Education Administration Charges) Act 1987 Adoption of Children Acts and Another Act Amendment Act 1986 Adoption of Children Act Amendment Act 1983-1986 Orders in Council under— Local Government Act 1936-1985 and the Libraries Act 1943-1979 Acquisition of Land Act 1967-1977 River Improvement Trust Act 1940-1985 and the Statutory Bodies Financial Arrangements Act 1982-1984 Regulations under— Public Service Act 1922-1978 Adoption of Children Act 1964-1986 Rules under the Lotto Act 1981-1984 Report— Project 21: Teachers for the Twenty-first Century. MINISTERIAL STATEMENT Cameron Inquiry into Road-funding Hon. R. J. HINZE (South Coast—Minister for Local Government, Main Roads and Racing) (10.03 a.m.), by leave: I wish to bring to the attention of the House a recent action by the Federal Government which has critical implications for the future of road- funding in Queensland. Of particular and serious concern is the most serious consequence for the rural sector. By way of background—when the Federal Government passed the Australian Land Transport Act in 1985, the Federal Minister for Transport, Mr Peter Morris, cunningly included a clause which set aside for his own determination the distribution between the States and Territories of 10 per cent of the funds allocated to arterial and local roads for the last three years of the life of that legislation. -
Green Infrastructure List
Climate Bonds Initiative August 2018 AUS & NZ Green Infrastructure list Australia Low carbon transport Project name Proponent Location State Classification Advanced Train Management Australian National Under Cross cutting, ICT System implementation on Government construction ARTC network Inland Rail Australian VIC to QLD Planned Freight rail, Infrastructure Government/ ARTC Melbourne - Adelaide - Perth Australian VIC to WA Planned Freight rail, Infrastructure rail upgrade Government Reliance Rail NSW Government/ NSW Complete Public Passenger Transport, Rail, Rolling stock Reliance Rail Sydney Light Rail NSW Government NSW Under Public Passenger Transport, construction Rail, Infrastructure Newcastle Light Rail NSW Government NSW Under Public Passenger Transport, construction Rail, Infrastructure Sydney Metro Northwest NSW Government NSW Under Public Passenger Transport, construction Rail, Infrastructure Sydney Metro: NSW Government NSW Planned Public Passenger Transport, Rail, Infrastructure - West - City and Southwest Parramatta Light Rail NSW Government NSW Planned Public Passenger Transport, Rail, Infrastructure - Stage 1 - Stage 2 North South Rail link - Stage 1 NSW Government NSW Planned Public Passenger Transport, Rail, Infrastructure Regional Rail Fleet NSW Government NSW Planned Public Passenger Transport, replacement Rail, Infrastructure Inner West Bus Services NSW Government NSW Planned Public Passenger Transport, optimisation Bus, Infrastructure Circular Quay Renewal NSW Government NSW Planned Cross cutting, Integration of transport -
Register of Tabled Papers
REGISTER OF TABLED PAPERS ALL FOUR SESSIONS OF THE FOURTH PARLIAMENT November 1868 to July 1870 Register of Tabled Papers — First Session — Fourth Parliament FIRST SESSION OF THE FOURTH PARLIAMENT 17 November 1868 1 Return of Writ for Thomas Blackett Stephens as the Member for the Electoral District of South Brisbane. Oath for Thomas Blackett Stephens as the Member for the Electoral District of South Brisbane. Return of Writ for Charles Lilley as the Member for the Electoral District of Fortitude Valley. Oath for Charles Lilley as the Member for the Electoral District of Fortitude Valley. Return of Writ for Henry Caleb Williams, John Malbon Thompson and John Murphy as the Members for the Electoral District of Ipswich. Oath for Henry Caleb Williams as a Member for the Electoral District of Ipswich. Oath for John Murphy as a Member for the Electoral District of Ipswich. Return of Writ for William Henry Groom as the Member for the Electoral District of Drayton and Toowoomba. Oath for William Henry Groom as a Member for the Electoral District of Drayton and Toowoomba. Return of Writ for Edmond Lambert Thornton as the Member for the Electoral District of Warwick. Oath of Edmond Lambert Thornton as the Member for the Electoral District of Warwick. Return of Writ Arthur Morley Frances and John Douglas as the Members for the Electoral District of East Moreton. Oath for Arthur Morley Frances as a Member for the Electoral District of East Moreton. Return of Writ for Samuel Hodgson, Frederick Augustus Forbes and George Thorn as the Members for the Electoral District of West Moreton. -
Strategic Business Case August 2019
Sunshine Coast Mass Transit Strategic Business Case August 2019 © Sunshine Coast Council 2009–present. Sunshine Coast Council™ is a registered trademark of Sunshine Coast Regional Council. www.sunshinecoast.qld.gov.au [email protected] T 07 5475 7272 F 07 5475 7277 Locked Bag 72 Sunshine Coast Mail Centre QLD 4560 Acknowledgements Council wishes to thank all contributors and stakeholders involved in the development of this document. Disclaimer Information contained in this document is based on available information at the time of writing. All figures and diagrams are indicative only and should be referred to as such. While the Sunshine Coast Council has exercised reasonable care in preparing this document it does not warrant or represent that it is accurate or complete. Council or its officers accept no responsibility for any loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from acting in reliance upon any material contained in this document. Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 6 Background ................................................................................................................................. 7 Key challenges ............................................................................................................................ 8 Project Investment Logic Map ................................................................................................... 12 Initiatives assessment .............................................................................................................. -
Programme and Abstract Book
1 Inequalities to Personalized Medicine: A Tale of Disparities Programme and Abstract Book th 54 Annual Scientific Meeting of the International Association for Dental Research Australian & New Zealand Division 28th September – 1st October 2014 Brisbane Convention & Exhibition Centre Brisbane, Australia www.iadranz.org.au 2 Welcome to the 54th Annual Scientific Meeting of the International Association for Dental Research, Australian & New Zealand Division Brisbane Convention & Exhibition Centre, Brisbane, Australia On behalf of the Local Organising Committee I would like to extend a warm welcome to all delegates and guests attending the 54th IADR ANZ Division meeting in sunny Brisbane. We received a record 160 abstracts of which 145 have been accepted for inclusion in the scientific programme, and have 184 registered delegates and 11 accompanying persons, making this meeting the largest ever in the history of the ANZ Division. We are proud of this achievement and thankful to you for your support of the meeting and the Division activities. We trust the program will be a scientific and social success, and hope that you enjoy your stay in Brisbane. The scientific programme is packed with national and international speakers, in a rejuvenated format that accommodates plenary, symposia and open oral sessions in addition to poster presentations. I am particularly indebted to the numerous invited guest speakers who have contributed generously to the programme. I’m sure this has been a key attraction for delegates. Rarely have we seen so many esteemed colleagues gathered in one location delivering cutting edge research findings. The theme for this year’s meeting is “Inequalities to Personalized Medicine: A Tale of Disparities”.