DOCSLIB.ORG

Green Growth a U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Green Growth a U.S ASSOCIATED PRESS/REED SAXON PRESS/REED ASSOCIATED Green Growth A U.S. Program for Controlling Climate Change and Expanding Job Opportunities Robert Pollin, Heidi Garrett-Peltier, James Heintz, and Bracken Hendricks September 2014 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Green Growth A U.S. Program for Controlling Climate Change and Expanding Job Opportunities Robert Pollin, Heidi Garrett-Peltier, James Heintz, and Bracken Hendricks September 2014 Contents 1 Summary 9 Chapter 1: Introduction 37 Chapter 2: Prospects for energy efficiency 98 Chapter 3: Prospects for clean renewable energy 142 Chapter 4: Oil, coal, natural gas, and nuclear power 174 Chapter 5: Carbon dioxide emissions levels under alternative scenarios 198 Chapter 6: Employment effects of the clean energy investment framework 236 Chapter 7: Macroeconomic issues with clean energy investments 267 Chapter 8: Advancing a workable clean energy policy agenda 325 Appendices 326 Appendix 1: Public transportation and energy efficiency 334 Appendix 2: Auto fuel-economy standards and energy consumption 337 Appendix 3: Explanation of the EIA’s Extended Policies case 343 Appendix 4: Methodology for estimating the employment effects of alternative energy industry expenditures 368 Appendix 5: Estimating fiscal impacts of clean energy public policy programs 384 References 396 Index 404 Acknowledgments and About the authors Contents List of Tables 16 Table 1.1: Conversion factors in standard energy units 40 Table 2.1: Comparative energy use and emissions levels for the United States and other advanced economies 41 Table 2.2: Energy consumption in the United States by economic sector 43 Table 2.3: Energy consumption in buildings, 2010 and 2030 Reference case 47 Table 2.4: Main sources of energy-efficiency investments: ‘Technoeconomic potential’ Residential - electricity 48 Table 2.5: Main sources of energy-efficiency investments: ‘Technoeconomic potential’ Residential - natural gas 49 Table 2.6: Main sources of energy-efficiency investments: ‘Technoeconomic potential’ Commercial - electricity 50 Table 2.7: Main sources of energy-efficiency investments: ‘Technoeconomic potential’ Commercial - natural gas 54 Table 2.8: Prospects for energy efficiency in buildings: EIA 2030 Reference case vs. the National Academy of Science’s technoeconomic cases 64 Table 2.9: Sources of energy saving in U.S. pulp and paper industry 65 Table 2.10: Sources of energy saving in U.S. iron and steel industry 67 Table 2.11: Range of estimates of economic potential for energy-efficiency improvements in industry 68 Table 2.12: Overall costs of energy-efficiency investments in industry from 2011 through 2030 72 Table 2.13: Energy use by transportation mode 75 Table 2.14: Estimated retail-price increase, gasoline savings, and reductions in greenhouse gas emissions of advanced vehicles (relative to baseline-average gasoline vehicles, 2005 models) 79 Table 2.15: Overall costs to reduce transportation-sector energy consumption from 28 to 20 Q-BTUs in 2030 83 Table 2.16: Summary of efficiency investments needed to reduce total U.S. energy consumption from EIA 2030 Reference case of 104.3 Q-BTUs to 70 Q-BTUs in 2030 91 Table 2.17: Estimates of direct rebound effects from two recent survey papers 102 Table 3.1: U.S. renewable energy consumption by categories in 2010 Contents 104 Table 3.2: EIA Reference case projection of 2030 U.S. renewable energy consumption 106 Table 3.3: EIA Reference case projection of 2035 U.S. renewable energy consumption 110 Table 3.4: Alternative estimates for renewable energy generation 114 Table 3.5: Greenhouse gas emissions reductions for alternative biofuels and biomass energy sources 120 Table 3.6: 2035 projections for wind, solar, and geothermal energy supply in EIA Low-Cost Renewable Technology case 121 Table 3.7: Summary of clean renewable supply potential from 2030 through 2035 124 Table 3.8: Estimated average levelized costs of electricity from renewable energy sources 127 Table 3.9: Range for total system levelized costs for electricity from renewable energy sources 128 Table 3.10: Average levelized costs of renewables versus fossil fuels and nuclear 130 Table 3.11: Range for total system levelized costs for conventional electricity sources 131 Table 3.12: Total levelized costs for clean renewables in 2030 based on EIA Reference case cost figures 132 Table 3.13: Total levelized costs for renewables in 2030 based on EIA Low-Cost Renewable Technology case 133 Table 3.14: Total levelized costs for producing 15.4 Q-BTUs of electricity powered by a combination of coal, natural gas, and nuclear energy (2010 prices) 134 Table 3.15: Comparison of total levelized costs for generating 15.4 Q-BTUs of electricity through Alternative Renewable and Nonrenewable cases 135 Table 3.16: Renewable energy capital expenditures for electricity generation: Annual levelized costs and present values 137 Table 3.17: Capital expenditures for estimated clean renewable capacity expansion from 2010 through 2030 146 Table 4.1: Estimated U.S. overall oil demand in 2030 153 Table 4.2: Coal-fired electricity capacity: Alternative projections 154 Table 4.3: Coal-fired electricity consumption: Alternative projections 155 Table 4.4: Natural gas-fired electricity capacity: Alternative projections 156 Table 4.5: Natural gas-fired electricity consumption: Alternative projections 157 Table 4.6: Nuclear-powered electricity capacity: Alternative projections 158 Table 4.7: Nuclear-powered electricity consumption: Alternative projections Contents 161 Table 4.8: Electricity generation from all nonrenewable energy sources: Alternative projections 166 Table 4.9: Total levelized costs for electricity generation from alternative energy sources 177 Table 5.1: CO2 emissions levels from alternative fossil fuel energy sources 179 Table 5.2: Weighted averages of U.S. emissions for oil, coal, and natural gas 182 Table 5.3: Summary of investment requirements under 2030 PERI/CAP scenario 187 Table 5.4: Features of Aggressive Reference case for U.S. energy consumption in 2030 188 Table 5.5: Alternative U.S. energy consumption scenarios for 2030 191 Table 5.6: CO2 emissions generated by alternative U.S. energy scenarios 194 Table 5.7: 2030 side case 1: 100 percent fuel switch from coal to natural gas off of Aggressive Reference case assumptions 195 Table 5.8: 2030 side case 2: Natural gas partially replaces nuclear power under PERI/CAP case 196 Table 5.9: 2030 side case 3: Natural gas fully replaces nuclear power under PERI/CAP case 209 Table 6.1: Employment creation through energy-efficiency capital expenditures in buildings and industry 210 Table 6.2: Job creation through buildings and industry efficiency investments 211 Table 6.3: Job creation through renewable energy capital investments 212 Table 6.4: Job creation through renewable energy operations and maintenance expenditures 213 Table 6.5: Job creation through capital expenditures to produce a net expansion of 11.8 Q-BTUs of clean renewable energy 214 Table 6.6: Job creation through operations and maintenance of 15.4 Q-BTUs of clean renewable energy by 2030 to 2035 215 Table 6.7: Summary of job creation for achieving a 70 Q-BTU economy with 15.4 Q-BTUs of clean renewable energy by 2030 to 2035 216 Table 6.8: Job creation within nonrenewable energy sectors: New capital expenditures and operations and maintenance for coal, natural gas, nuclear power, and oil 218 Table 6.9: Net change in employment through transferring funds from nonrenewable to clean energy sector spending 226 Table 6.10: Occupations with large growth potential through green investments Contents 228 Table 6.11: Breakdown of job creation by formal educational credential levels 231 Table 6.12: Bioenergy operations and maintenance: Job creation breakdown by formal educational credential levels 232 Table 6.13: Bioenergy operations and maintenance: Occupations with large growth potential 240 Table 7.1: Comparison of alternative U.S. GDP growth forecasts under baseline and with cap-and-trade legislation 242 Table 7.2: Projected clean energy investments as share of U.S. economy 253 Table 7.3: Expenditure allocation for all ARRA clean energy appropriations from U.S. Council of Economic Advisers, January 2010 256 Table 7.4: Estimates of direct job creation through ARRA clean energy projects within the U.S. Department of Energy 258 Table 7.5: Estimate of total job creation on DOE-funded ARRA projects 262 Table 7.6: ARRA clean energy 1705 loan guarantee program: Recipients of guarantees from 2009 through 2013 273 Table 8.1: A clean energy policy agenda for achieving the U.S. 20-year CO2 emission reduction target 316 Table 8.2: Summary of average annual sources of revenues/net savings and expenditures from clean energy projects 326 Table A1.1: U.S. energy consumption in 2011 through alternative transportation modes 332 Table A1.2: Employment creation through investments in public transportation 332 Table A1.3: Employment creation through doubling public bus transportation availability in 20 years 334 Table A2.1: Age range for entire U.S. auto fleet in 2001 335 Table A2.2: Calculations for estimating the average fuel economy level for U.S. light-duty vehicles as of 2030 341 Table A3.1: Alternative U.S. energy consumption scenarios for 2030 including EIA’s extended policies case 342 Table A3.2: CO2 emissions generated by alternative U.S. energy scenarios 354 Table A4.1: Composition of energy industries using input-output model 364 Table A4.2: Change in U.S. output multipliers for alternative energy sectors, 1995-2007 365 Table A4.3: Possible impacts on employment from varying rates of GDP growth and labor productivity growth Contents 366 Table A4.4: U.S. average annual GDP growth and labor productivity growth over various time periods 373 Table A5.1: Federal and state green bank programs: Estimating annual program costs over 20 years 375 Table A5.2: Federal loan guarantee program for clean energy investments: Estimating annual costs for 20-year program 377 Table A5.3: Estimated 20-year public budgetary impacts through policies supporting $200 billion annual U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Of Ecological Modernisation?
    JOBS & ENVIRONMENT: THE ‘DOUBLE DIVIDEND’ OF ECOLOGICAL MODERNISATION? Kate Crowley School of Government, University of Tasmania Published as “Jobs & Environment: the Double Dividend of Ecological Modernisation” International Journal of Social Economics, Vol 26, No. 7/8/9, pp. 1013-1026. AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTE Dr Kate Crowley is a lecturer in environmental policy and public administration in the School of Government, University of Tasmania; GPO Box 252-22, Hobart, Australia, 7001; Ph 61 3 62 262364 Fax 61 3 62 240973; [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper reviews the emergent literature on ecological modernisation and considers its theoretical utility in terms of assessing environmental employment opportunities in Australia. It explores the potential for ecologically modernist policy to offer a way beyond ‘jobs versus environment’ obstacles to greener employment. The future development of post industrial economies is said by ecological modernists to depend upon an ability to produce high value, high quality products with stringent enforcement standards. In these terms, environmental amenity becomes a superior good, and environmental protection not an economic burden, but an opportunity for enhanced growth and job creation (Weale, 1992). The employment impact of such claims is examined in the Australian context. KEYWORDS environment; employment; green jobs; green industry; ecological modernisation; Australia. INTRODUCTION There is a growing body of literature on ecological modernisation as an emergent concept in environmental policy analysis which has both theoretical and practical policy applications (Spaargaren & Mol, 1992, p. 334). Although it remains essentially contested (Boland, 1994, p. 140) this literature has immense utility, I argue, for environmental employment analysis. In an uncritical sense, ecological modernisation does seem to offer both economic promise and green employment creation prospects in Jacobs’s (1994) sense of a ‘double dividend’ below.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Growth Policy, De-Growth, and Sustainability: the Alternative Solution for Achieving the Balance Between Both the Natural and the Economic System
    sustainability Editorial Green Growth Policy, De-Growth, and Sustainability: The Alternative Solution for Achieving the Balance between Both the Natural and the Economic System Diego A. Vazquez-Brust 1,2 and José A. Plaza-Úbeda 3,* 1 Portsmouth Faculty of Business and Law, Richmond Building, Portland Street, Portsmouth P01 3DE, UK; [email protected] 2 Production Engineering Department, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis 88040-900, SC, Brazil 3 Economics and Business Department, University of Almeria, 04120 Almeria, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] 1. Introduction “We are ethically obliged and incited to think beyond what are treated as the realistic limits of the possible” (Judith Butler, 2020) The existence of an imbalance between our planet’s reserves of resources and the conditions necessary to maintain high levels of economic growth is evident [1]. The limitation of natural resources pushes companies to consider the possibility of facing critical situations in the future that will make it extremely difficult to reconcile economic Citation: Vazquez-Brust, D.A.; and sustainable objectives [2]. Plaza-Úbeda, J.A. Green Growth In this context of dependence on an environment with finite resources, there are Policy, De-Growth, and Sustainability: growing interests in alternative economic models, such as the Circular Economy, oriented to The Alternative Solution for the maximum efficient use of resources [3–5]. However, the Circular Economy approach is Achieving the Balance between Both still very far from the reality of industries, and the depletion of natural resources continues the Natural and the Economic System. undeterred [6]. It is increasingly necessary to explore alternative approaches to address the Sustainability 2021, 13, 4610.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Green Growth Summary in English
    Towards Green Growth Summary in English • Green growth means fostering economic growth and development while ensuring that natural assets continue to provide the resources and environmental services on which our well-being relies. To do this it must catalyse investment and innovation which will underpin sustained growth and give rise to new economic opportunities. • A return to ‘business as usual’ would be unwise and ultimately unsustainable, involving risks that could impose human costs and constraints on economic growth and development. It could result in increased water scarcity, resource bottlenecks, air and water pollution, climate change and biodiversity loss which would be irreversible; thus the need for strategies to achieve greener growth. Towards Green Growth - ISBN 978-92-64-094970 © OECD 2011 Sources of green growth Green growth has the potential to address economic and environmental challenges and open up new sources of growth through the following channels: • Productivity. Incentives for greater efficiency in the use of resources and natural assets: enhancing productivity, reducing waste and energy consumption and making resources available to highest value use. • Innovation. Opportunities for innovation, spurred by policies and framework conditions that allow for new ways of addressing environmental problems. • New markets. Creation of new markets by stimulating demand for green technologies, goods, and services; creating potential for new job opportunities. • Confidence. Boosting investor confidence through greater predictability and stability around how governments are going to deal with major environmental issues. • Stability. More balanced macroeconomic conditions, reduced resource price volatility and supporting fiscal consolidation through, for instance, reviewing the composition and efficiency of public spending and increasing revenues through the pricing of pollution.
    [Show full text]
  • Update on Recent Progress in Reform of Inefficient Fossil-Fuel Subsidies That Encourage Wasteful Consumption
    UPDATE ON RECENT PROGRESS IN REFORM OF INEFFICIENT FOSSIL-FUEL SUBSIDIES THAT ENCOURAGE WASTEFUL CONSUMPTION Contribution by the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to the G20 Energy Transitions Working Group in consultation with: International Energy Forum (IEF), Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and the World Bank 2nd Energy Transitions Working Group Meeting Toyama, 18-19 April 2019 Update on Recent Progress in Reform of Inefficient Fossil-Fuel Subsidies that Encourage Wasteful Consumption This document, as well as any data and any map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. This update does not necessarily express the views of the G20 countries or of the IEA, IEF, OECD, OPEC and the World Bank or their member countries. The G20 countries, IEA, IEF, OECD, OPEC and the World Bank assume no liability or responsibility whatsoever for the use of data or analyses contained in this document, and nothing herein shall be construed as interpreting or modifying any legal obligations under any intergovernmental agreement, treaty, law or other text, or as expressing any legal opinion or as having probative legal value in any proceeding. Please cite this publication as: OECD/IEA (2019), "Update on recent progress in reform of inefficient fossil-fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption", https://oecd.org/fossil-fuels/publication/OECD-IEA-G20-Fossil-Fuel-Subsidies-Reform-Update-2019.pdf │ 3 Summary This report discusses recent trends and developments in the reform of inefficient fossil- fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption, within the G20 and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from Country Experiences Executive Summary
    Green Growth in Practice Lessons from Country Experiences Executive Summary Supported by: Steering committee Implementing partners JIN About the Green Growth Best Practice Initiative Green growth is a relatively young field of public policy practice. The Green Growth Best Practice (GGBP) initiative was set up to accelerate learning and to inform design of green growth programs, by undertaking an analysis of early experiences. For this report, GGBP engaged 75 authors in evaluating practices and lessons from green growth programs in all regions of the world. GGBP is also conducting a broad array of activities to build awareness and support countries in applying results of the findings to their national and sub-national programs, such as by presenting results through seminars and dialogues requested by government agencies and partnering with others on policy dialogue workshops, e-learning and peer learning programs. GGBP is supported by the European Climate Foundation, Climate and Development Knowledge Network, and the Global Green Growth Institute, and is governed by a steering committee with representatives from the following organizations: Children’s Investment Fund Foundation; Climate and Development Knowledge Network; European Climate Foundation; Global Green Growth Institute; International Climate Initiative of the German Federal Ministry of Environment, Nature, Conservation, and Nuclear Safety; LEDS Global Partnership; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; United Nations Development Programme; United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific; United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean; United Nations Environment Programme; and the World Bank. GGBP is also working in close collaboration with various other regional and global partners and green growth experts.
    [Show full text]
  • On Green Growth with Sustainable Capital
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Basu, Parantap; Jamasb, Tooraj Working Paper On green growth with sustainable capital Working paper, No. 11-2020 Provided in Cooperation with: Department of Economics, Copenhagen Business School (CBS) Suggested Citation: Basu, Parantap; Jamasb, Tooraj (2020) : On green growth with sustainable capital, Working paper, No. 11-2020, Copenhagen Business School (CBS), Department of Economics, Frederiksberg, http://hdl.handle.net/10398/9811 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/222886 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ www.econstor.eu Department of Economics Copenhagen Business School Working paper 11-2020 On Green Growth with Sustainable Capital Parantap Basu Tooraj Jamasb Department of Economics – Porcelænshaven 16A, 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change, Green Growth, and Sustainable Development
    Climate Change, Green Growth, and Sustainable Development United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Overview • Sustainable Development – Historical Evolution – Green Growth • Climate Change, Energy, Development – Energy Access – Two strategies – Mainstreaming Sustainable Development Evolution • I: Sustainability (1962-92) – Challenge: Pollution, Population, Limits/ NR – Response: UNCHE, UNEP, Ministries, laws • II: Environment and Development (1972-02) – Challenge: UNCHE, WCS, WCED, Shocks – Response: UNCED, A21, WSSD, JPOI • III: Sustainable Development (1992-12) – Challenge: Shocks Redux (Multiple Crises) – Response: Mainstreaming (Green Growth) The Impact of Crises, 1973-2008 • Commodities Shocks (Food, Energy) – Food security, funding commitments – Problem: delivery on commitments • Economic Shocks (Finance, Recession) – Stimulus packages – Problem: procyclical for developing countries • Climate Shock (and Ecological Shocks) – Carbon price, carbon tax – Problem: Energy Access Governance Evolution • I: The Turn to Advocacy – Pollution (Clean Air Acts, EPAs, POPs) – NR (Protected Areas, Forests, Water) • II: The Turn to Knowledge – NSDS, EIA, data and analysis (WCMC, IPCC), awareness, disclosure (ISO, CSR, PIC) • III: The Turn to Institutions – IEG, “Pilot” ETR, Capacity, Participation • IV (?): The Turn to Action? The Key Role of NSDS • Agenda 21–call for strategies for sustainable development • Rio+5: formulate and elaborate by 2002 • MDG 7, target 9: Integrate SD principles into country policies/programmes • JPOI: begin
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Green Jobs?
    TemaNord 2012:534 TemaNord Ved Stranden 18 DK-1061 Copenhagen K www.norden.org Measuring green jobs? An evaluation of definitions and statistics for green activities Measuring green jobs? An evaluation of definitions and statistics for green activities The report reviews the different initiatives aiming to measure aspects of “green” sectors, jobs and technologies. The report discusses whether the statistics collected under the present initia- tives aimed at measuring these aspects increase insights into the fundamental questions motivating the initiatives. An alternative framework is suggested, as it appears fundamentally impossible to make consistent frameworks for a division of the economy into “green” and “non-green” activities. The analysis has been carried out during the period September 2011 – March 2012 by Vista Analysis AS, Gaia Consulting Oy and University of Aarhus. Gaia Consulting Oy is responsible for the chapters 5.2., 5.3, 6.2, 6.3 and 7.2 only. The project was commissioned by the Working Group on Environment and Economy under the Nordic Council of Ministers. TemaNord 2012:534 ISBN 978-92-893-2370-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.6027/TN2012-534 TN2012534 omslag.indd 1 23-07-2012 07:27:21 Measuring green jobs? An evaluation of definitions and statistics for green activities Annegrete Bruvoll and Karin Ibenholt (ed.), Sanna Ahvenharju, Marika Bröckl, Louise Martinsen and Marianne Zandersen TemaNord 2012:534 Measuring green jobs? An evaluation of definitions and statistics for green activities Annegrete Bruvoll and Karin Ibenholt (ed.), Sanna Ahvenharju, Marika Bröckl, Louise Martinsen and Marianne Zandersen TemaNord 2012:534 ISBN 978-92-893-2370-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.6027/TN2012534 © Nordic Council of Ministers 2012 Cover photo: Photodisc; ImageSelect Print: Kailow Express ApS Copies: 260 Printed in Denmark This publication has been published with financial support by the Nordic Council of Ministers.
    [Show full text]
  • Degrowth, Green Growth, A- Growth and Post-Growth: the Debate on Ways Forward from Our Growth Addiction an Annotated Bibliography
    LEAP Research Report No. 57 Degrowth, green growth, a- growth and post-growth: The debate on ways forward from our growth addiction An annotated bibliography Lin Roberts Jocelyn Henderson with students of ERST636 1 Degrowth, green growth, a-growth and post-growth: The debate on ways forward from our growth addiction Lin Roberts Jocelyn Henderson with students of ERST636 2013 -2020 Land Environment and People Research Report No. 57 2020 978-0-86476-464-5 (Print) 978-0-86476-465-2 (PDF) 1172-0859 (Print) 1172-0891 (PDF) Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand 2 Degrowth, green growth, a-growth and post-growth: The debate on ways forward from our growth addiction Introduction It is widely recognised that averting catastrophic climate change and ecological disaster requires society to relinquish the current growth-focused economic system. However, what this change might include and how it can be implemented is less clear. Different solutions have been envisioned, with advocates for variants of “green growth,” “post-growth” or “de-growth” all presenting possible options for a new economic and social system that can exist within planetary boundaries. This annotated bibliography includes a range of articles which engage with and critique these concepts, consider how they might work in practice and propose strategies for overcoming the obstacles to implementation. The papers were selected by Lincoln University postgraduate students taking the course ERST636: Aspects of Sustainability: an international perspective, in preparation for a class debate of the moot “Green growth is simply designed to perpetuate current unsustainable practices and divert attention away from the need for more fundamental change”.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Green New Deal for Climate, Energy, and Development
    Technical Note A Global Green New Deal for Climate, Energy, and Development A big push strategy to Drive down the cost of renewable energy Ramp up deployment in developing countries End energy poverty Contribute to economic recovery and growth Generate employment in all countries and Help avoid dangerous climate change United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs December 2009 Acknowledgements This strategy has been prepared by Alan AtKisson, consultant to the United Nations Department of Economic Affairs, with guidance from Jomo K. Sundaram, Assistant‐Secretary‐General for Economic and Social Affairs, and Tariq Banuri, David O’Connor and Ivan Vera of the Division for Sustainable Development. It is an elaboration of a strategy first spelt out in the Department’s World Economic and Social Survey 2009: Promoting Development, Saving the Planet, whose principal authors were Richard Kozul‐Wright and Imran Habib Ahmed, under the direction of Rob Vos, Director, Division for Policy Analysis and Development. i Key Messages Energy is the key to economic development, and renewable energy is the key to a future without dangerous climate change. But renewable energy is too expensive today, especially for the world's poor, many of whom have no access to modern energy at all. Although the price of renewable energy is falling, it will not fall fast enough anywhere, on its own, to help the world win the race against time with dangerous climate change. Public policies can help produce the necessary decline in the global price of renewable energy and make it universally affordable in one to two decades. The key mechanism is a rapid increase in installed capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Growth and Developing Countries a Summary for Policy Makers
    Green Growth and Developing Countries A Summary for Policy Makers June 2012 Table of contents 1. Introduction 5 11 Green growth: why it matters for developing countries 6 12 Green growth for sustainable and equitable development 9 2. Patterns of growth in developing countries ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������10 3. A policy framework for greening growth in developing countries 11 31 Dimension 1 – national green growth plans that generate enabling conditions 12 32 Dimension 2 – mainstreaming mechanisms 13 33 Dimension 3 – green growth policy instruments to tap green opportunities ������������������������������ 15 34 Green growth policies in action ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 19 4. How can the global community help? ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������22 5. Measuring progress 24 6. Next steps 25 References 27 Figures Figure 1 GHG emissions: 1970-2005 ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������7
    [Show full text]
  • From Growth to Green Growth - a Framework
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES FROM GROWTH TO GREEN GROWTH - A FRAMEWORK Stéphane Hallegatte Geoffrey Heal Marianne Fay David Treguer Working Paper 17841 http://www.nber.org/papers/w17841 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 February 2012 The research in this paper was funded in part by the World Bank and by Meteo-France. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the World Bank, its executive directors, the countries they represent, or the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2012 by Stéphane Hallegatte, Geoffrey Heal, Marianne Fay, and David Treguer. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. From Growth to Green Growth - a Framework Stéphane Hallegatte, Geoffrey Heal, Marianne Fay, and David Treguer NBER Working Paper No. 17841 February 2012 JEL No. D90,Q01,Q32,Q4 ABSTRACT Green growth is about making growth resource-efficient, cleaner and more resilient without slowing it. This paper aims at clarifying this in an analytical framework and proposing foundations for green growth. This framework identifies channels through which green policies can potentially contribute to economic growth. Finally, the paper discusses the policies that can be implemented to capture co-benefits and environmental benefits. Since green growth policies pursue a variety of goals, they are best served by a combination of instruments: price-based policies are important but are only one component in a policy tool-box that can also include norms and regulation, public production and direct investment, information creation and dissemination, education and moral suasion, or industrial and innovation policies.
    [Show full text]