Denying Voting Rights to the Cherokee Freedmen?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Denying Voting Rights to the Cherokee Freedmen? ShouldShould thethe UnitedUnited StatesStates bebe FightingFighting forfor JimJim Crow’sCrow’s SurvivalSurvival byby ItsIts ComplicityComplicity inin DenyingDenying VotingVoting RightsRights toto thethe CherokeeCherokee Freedmen?Freedmen? When an Indian tribe decides to deny its citizens voting rights that have been guaranteed by a treaty with the United States and are protected by the U.S. Constitution, can tribal sovereignty allow Indian nations to extinguish voting rights and the citizenship of its citizens where the basis for their exclusion is race? By Jon Velie Imagine today if Mississippi—or some other former That hope would turn to dismay, however, if—instead slave-holding state with a history of disenfranchising its cit- of overturning the new discriminatory state government’s izens—should decide to hold an election to change the action—the citizens saw the federal government issue a state’s constitution to deny the state’s African-American cit- statement that the Department of Justice will not intervene izens the right to vote. Because § 5 of the Voting Rights Act, because the state of Mississippi is sovereign and the 42 U.S.C. § 1971 (1965) (as amended), mandates that for state’s exclusion of African-American voters is clearly a Mississippi, which is covered by the act’s special provi- matter of states’ rights. The United States, of course, sions, changes in qualifications or practices that have an would sincerely regret the negative impact on the voting impact on voting rights must pass the scrutiny of the U.S. rights of Mississippi’s African-Americans. Not only would attorney general (through the Civil Rights Division of the the federal approval of Mississippi’s new constitution en- U.S. Department of Justice), Mississippi’s African-American able the local effort to disenfranchise some citizens to citizens would take comfort in the confidence that the U.S. succeed, but the thrust of federal action would also re- Constitution protects their right to vote. These citizens verse one of the dominant themes of the federal victory in would also expect that the United States would step in to the Civil War—equal citizenship rights for former slaves stop the state’s illegal practice under the act to protect their and their descendants. Thus, it may come as a surprise to rights under the Thirteenth and Fifteenth Amendments.1 most that, since about 1980,2 the U.S. government has ac- February 2007 | The Federal Lawyer | 43 tively supported just such a denial of voting rights to the quickly forgot its same duty to the Cherokee Freedmen, Cherokee Freedmen—black citizens of the Cherokee Na- when the Cherokee Nation decided to test its own capac- tion of Oklahoma. ity to exclude its citizens and transform its prior practice of discrimination against the Freedmen into a complete dis- Relations Between the Cherokee Nation and the enfranchisement codified into the Cherokee Nation’s laws. Federal Government The Cherokee Nation requested permission from the The U.S. Treaty of 1866 with the Cherokee Nation Bureau of Indian Affairs to amend the Cherokee constitu- included a provision whereby the federal government tion by removing the requirement that the secretary of the guarantees rights to the Cherokee Freedmen, including interior approve its election procedures. The Cherokee voting rights, equal to those held by all other citizens in Nation’s proposal also sought to remove the clause that the Cherokee Nation. Article VII of the treaty granted orig- stated that the U.S. Constitution is the “supreme law” of the inal federal jurisdiction over all causes involving the 1866 land and that the tribe would not enact any law in oppo- treaty. This original jurisdiction should, of course, include sition to federal law. This action would clearly allow for disputes between the Freedmen and the Cherokee Nation the exclusion of the Cherokee Freedmen from political without the need for the Freedmen to go to the tribal court participation without any federal oversight regarding the first. The federal government had previously enforced the Cherokee Nation’s power. Freedmen’s citizenship rights as early as 1870.3 In the ini- Recognizing the impact of the Cherokee Nation’s pro- tial aftermath of the Civil War, the United States vigorous- posal, on March 15, 2002, Neal McCaleb, the assistant sec- ly imposed the demand that the Freedmen receive the retary of the interior, responded to a letter submitted by rights that were some of the hard-fought objectives of the Chad Smith, the chief of the Cherokee Nation, in which he Civil War. However, this is no longer the case. In each requested permission for a referendum vote with specific present-day election of the Cherokee Nation that the requirements for the vote. According to McCaleb’s Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Indian Affairs response, the bureau would not object to the referendum approves—most recently the May 24, 2003, Cherokee trib- itself—regarding the decision about eliminating the inclu- al election4—the U.S. government directly violates not sion of U.S. government approval procedures in the only the Thirteenth Amendment of the Constitution by per- Cherokee constitution—but, the bureau wrote, the petuating “badges” of slavery but also the Fifteenth Cherokee Freedmen must be permitted to vote in the elec- Amendment, which prohibits the United States from deny- tion, and, regardless of the result, the Cherokee Freedmen ing the right to vote “on account of race, color, or previ- could not be removed from the tribe. Assistant Secretary ous condition of servitude” by its express action in approv- McCaleb wrote that the 1970 Principal Chiefs Act, Pub. L. ing the discriminatory laws and practices of the Cherokee 91-495, 84 Stat. 1091 (requiring submission of voting pro- Nation that have intentionally excluded its Freedmen citi- cedures to the Bureau of Indian Affairs) still applied.5 zens from the voting process. Contrary to the express instructions of the Department of Ironically, immediately prior to the Cherokee Nation’s the Interior, the Cherokee Nation did not submit its 2003 May 2003 election, the Bureau of Indian Affairs upheld the election procedures to the bureau for review. If allowed by voting rights of the Seminole Freedmen. In two cases— the United States, those election procedures would result Seminole Nation of Oklahoma v. Norton, 206 F.R.D. 1 in the elimination of the Freedmen’s voting rights as a mat- (D.D.C. 2001) (Seminole I), and Seminole Nation of ter of Cherokee law and, as anticipated, the Cherokee Oklahoma v. Norton, 223 F. Supp. 2d 122 (D.D.C. 2002) Nation did not permit its Freedmen citizens to vote in the (Seminole II)—the bureau refused to recognize an election election that was held on May 24, 2003. that had voted to oust the black Seminoles from the tribe In the face of defiance from the Cherokee Nation, at as well as a subsequent election that had denied the first the Bureau of Indian Affairs determined that it would Seminole Freedmen the right to vote. In 2000 and 2002, the not recognize the election of Chad Smith as chief. In a let- U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that ter dated July 25, 2003, the bureau took the initial position the Seminole Treaty of 1866 was still in force, that the that the situation appeared identical to the case involving Freedmen could not be voted out of the tribe, and that the Seminole Freedmen and that the Cherokee Nation had they were entitled to vote in the tribe’s elections. A vital not complied with the 1970 Principal Chiefs Act. The component of the case was the U.S. government’s respon- bureau determined that the 1970 act mandated U.S. sibility to enforce the 1970 Principal Chiefs Act mandating involvement with the Cherokee Nation’s election, citing that the Seminoles submit voting procedures to the Bureau Wheeler v. Department of the Interior, 811 F. 2d 549 (10th of Indian Affairs for approval, which the Seminole Nation Cir. 1987).6 had not done. The Bureau of Indian Affairs was duty- On Aug. 6, 2003, however, the Bureau of Indian Affairs bound to protect the rights of the Freedmen citizens as reversed its position of disapproval to one that recognized well as their voting rights within the tribe, because the dis- an election even though it met none of the bureau’s clear- criminatory voting procedures would have violated the ly expressed criteria. Taking a curiously bifurcated posi- tribe’s constitution and another 1866 treaty—one between tion, the bureau stated it would recognize the election for the Seminole Nation and the United States. chief but withhold its approval of the proposed amend- In spite of the Bureau of Indian Affairs’ fulfillment of its ment to the constitution, again citing Wheeler v. legal duty to the Seminole Freedmen, in 2003, the bureau Department of the Interior without mentioning or clarifying 44 | The Federal Lawyer | February 2007 why it no longer viewed the 1970 Principal Chiefs Act to Supremacy Clause, U.S. Const. Art. VI, Cl. 2, treaties super- be a specific mandate for Congress to be involved in sede any conflicting state laws and have the same force Cherokee elections.7 and effect as federal statutes do. See, e.g., Antoine v. What could possibly have led the Bureau of Indian Washington, 420 U.S. 194, 203–204 (1975); see also Felix S. Affairs to such a reversal—a decision that would betray the Cohen, Handbook of Federal Indian Law 127 (1982). Also, Cherokee Freedmen? What could have led the bureau to unlike the state of Mississippi, the federal government has contradict its March 15, 2002, position in support of the allowed Indian nations to determine the criteria for tribal Cherokee Freedmen’s right to vote in Cherokee elections? citizenship even to the point of permitting the Cherokee The answer may be found in documents related to the hir- Nation to deny citizenship to documented full-blooded ing of embattled lobbyist Jack Abramoff, who was retained Cherokee.10 In the case of Freedmen, the United States by Cherokee Nation Enterprises to lobby for “sovereignty has, at least temporarily, allowed the Cherokee Nation to issues” in the months prior to the May 2003 election.
Recommended publications
  • Black Seminoles Vs. Red Seminoles
    Black Seminoles vs. Red Seminoles Indian tribes across the country are reaping windfall profits these days, usually from gambling operations. But some, like the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma, are getting rich from belated government payouts for lands taken hundreds of years ago. What makes the Seminoles unique is that this tribe, unlike any other, has existed for nearly three centuries as a mixture of Indians and blacks, runaway slaves who joined the Indians as warriors in Florida. Together, they fought government troops in some of the bloodiest wars in U.S. history. In the late 1830s, they lost their land, and were forced to a new Indian home in present-day Oklahoma. Over the years, some tribe members have intermarried, blurring the color lines even further. Now the government is paying the tribe $56 million for those lost Florida lands, and the money is threatening to divide a nation. Seminole Chief Jerry Haney says the black members of the tribe are no longer welcome. After 300 years together, the chief says the tribe wants them to either prove they're Indian, or get out. Harsh words from the Seminole chief for the 2,000 black members of this mixed Indian tribe. In response, the black members say they're just as much a Seminole as Haney is. www.jupiter.fl.us/history On any given Sunday, go with Loretta Guess to the Indian Baptist church in Seminole County, Okla., and you'll find red and black Seminoles praying together, singing hymns in Seminole, sharing meals, and catching up on tribal news.
    [Show full text]
  • Slavery in the United States - Wikipedia Page 1 of 25
    Slavery in the United States - Wikipedia Page 1 of 25 Slavery in the United States Slavery in the United States was the legal institution of human chattel enslavement, primarily of Africans and African Americans, that existed in the United States of America in the 18th and 19th centuries. Slavery had been practiced by Americans under British rule from early colonial days, and was legal in all Thirteen Colonies at the time of the Declaration of Independence in 1776. It lasted until the end of the American Civil War. By the time of the American Revolution (1775–1783), the status of slave had been institutionalized as a racial caste associated with African ancestry.[1] When the United States Constitution was ratified (1789), a relatively small number of free people of color were among the voting citizens (male property owners).[2] During and immediately following the Revolutionary War, abolitionist laws were passed in most Northern states and a movement developed to abolish slavery. Most of these states had a higher proportion of free labor than in the South and economies based on different industries. They abolished slavery by the end of the 18th century, some with gradual systems that kept adults as slaves for two decades. However, the rapid expansion of the cotton industry in the Deep South after the invention of the cotton gin greatly increased demand for slave labor, and the An animation showing when United States territories and states Southern states continued as slave societies. Those states attempted to extend slavery into the new Western forbade or allowed slavery, 1789–1861.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Slavery and the Making of the Modern World Wenner-Gren Symposium Supplement 22
    T HE WENNER-GREN SYMPOSIUM SERIES CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY A TLANTIC SLAVERY AND THE MAKING OF THE MODERN WORLD I BRAHIMA THIAW AND DEBORAH L. MACK, GUEST EDITORS A tlantic Slavery and the Making of the Modern World: Wenner-Gren Symposium Supplement 22 Atlantic Slavery and the Making of the Modern World: Experiences, Representations, and Legacies An Introduction to Supplement 22 Atlantic Slavery and the Rise of the Capitalist Global Economy V The Slavery Business and the Making of “Race” in Britain OLUME 61 and the Caribbean Archaeology under the Blinding Light of Race OCTOBER 2020 VOLUME SUPPLEMENT 61 22 From Country Marks to DNA Markers: The Genomic Turn S UPPLEMENT 22 in the Reconstruction of African Identities Diasporic Citizenship under Debate: Law, Body, and Soul Slavery, Anthropological Knowledge, and the Racialization of Africans Sovereignty after Slavery: Universal Liberty and the Practice of Authority in Postrevolutionary Haiti O CTOBER 2020 From the Transatlantic Slave Trade to Contemporary Ethnoracial Law in Multicultural Ecuador: The “Changing Same” of Anti-Black Racism as Revealed by Two Lawsuits Filed by Afrodescendants Serving Status on the Gambia River Before and After Abolition The Problem: Religion within the World of Slaves The Crying Child: On Colonial Archives, Digitization, and Ethics of Care in the Cultural Commons A “tone of voice peculiar to New-England”: Fugitive Slave Advertisements and the Heterogeneity of Enslaved People of African Descent in Eighteenth-Century Quebec Valongo: An Uncomfortable Legacy Raising
    [Show full text]
  • Trade and Plunder Networks in the Second Seminole War in Florida, 1835-1842
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2005 Trade and Plunder Networks in the Second Seminole War in Florida, 1835-1842 Toni Carrier University of South Florida Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons Scholar Commons Citation Carrier, Toni, "Trade and Plunder Networks in the Second Seminole War in Florida, 1835-1842" (2005). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/2811 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact scholarcommons@usf.edu. Trade and Plunder Networks in the Second Seminole War in Florida, 1835-1842 by Toni Carrier A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Anthropology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Brent R. Weisman, Ph.D. Robert H. Tykot, Ph.D. Trevor R. Purcell, Ph.D. Date of Approval: April 14, 2005 Keywords: Social Capital, Political Economy, Black Seminoles, Illicit Trade, Slaves, Ranchos, Wreckers, Slave Resistance, Free Blacks, Indian Wars, Indian Negroes, Maroons © Copyright 2005, Toni Carrier Dedication To my baby sister Heather, 1987-2001. You were my heart, which now has wings. Acknowledgments I owe an enormous debt of gratitude to the many people who mentored, guided, supported and otherwise put up with me throughout the preparation of this manuscript. To Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • African Americans Reclaiming the Indigenous Past RUTH MATHIS and TERRY WEIK
    15 Not just Black and White: African Americans reclaiming the Indigenous past RUTH MATHIS AND TERRY WEIK GOING BACK TO FETCH IT In the last four decades, archaeologists have actively addressed the history of the African Diaspora but now the time has come to broaden the scope of inquiry to include their Indigenous heritage and relationships with other Indigenous peoples. The cultural identity of the people of the African Diaspora throughout the Americas will not be fully understood until their own cultural beliefs and interchanges with Indigenous Americans are given full consideration. Africans were forcibly brought to the Americas, and, like other Indigenous folks, displaced from their homelands. If we determine that people removed from their land are no longer Indigenous, then many present-day American Indians would not qualify as such. Clearly, ‘Indigenous’ should be defined to include the geography and context of each population’s historical trajectory Further, Indigenous peoples in the Americas, displaced and otherwise, are reclaiming their heritage in a way that illuminates forgotten social and political linkages, while seeking redress for historic injustices committed against them. This reclamation moves beyond white scholars’ Eurocentric expectations of marginalized historical identities. Archaeology will play an important role in this rebirth of African American and Native American agency in theory and practice. In what follows, we outline a perspective on archaeology that accounts for this African-Amerindian interaction and that re-categorizes the racial and ethnic terminology of Black, Indian, mestizo, mulatto, slave, etc. toward one of cultural interchange and genesis. At the same time, we critique the modern practice of archaeology as a profession that defines cultural identity and often ignores the political consequences of such redefinitions for living descendants.
    [Show full text]
  • Precarious Lives: Black Seminoles and Other Freedom Seekers in Florida
    Precarious lives Black Seminoles and other freedom seekers in Florida before the US civil war A. A. Morgan Copyright 2020 A. A. Morgan This work is licensed under the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. You are welcome to share it, within a few basic limits stated in the license, as long as you credit the author and do not alter the work. To view a copy of the license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0. I gratefully acknowledge the insightful and constructive feedback received from Cheryl Nicchitta and Donna Stokes. All remaining mistakes and infelicities are my own. This work is offered free of charge. If you enjoy reading it, please consider making a small donation to the charity of your choice. i Dedication Sandy Perryman ? – 1839 warrior, diplomat, linguist ii Contents 1 Introduction 3 Seeking freedom in the Americas 18 Florida — a precarious haven 19 Seeking freedom in Florida 27 A fragile freedom 41 War 75 After Florida 78 Notes 95 Sources iii Introduction Florida was once a place where people in bondage came to be free. For generations, fugitives from the slave plantations of Alabama, the Carolinas, and Georgia crossed the border into Spanish Florida, where they sought official sanctuary or disappeared into the peninsula’s uncharted forests, swamps, and savannas. There, many of them fell in with American Indians, also relatively new to the region, who would become known as Seminoles. Their relationships with the Indians took many forms and have been described over the years in many ways — from slavery (similar to the Euro-American version but less brutal), to a form of vassalage in which they owed an annual tribute but were otherwise left to their own devices, to alliances between equals in which they served as trusted advisors, interpreters, and military allies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Whiteman's Seminole White Manhood, Indians and Slaves, and the Second Seminole War
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2011 The Whiteman's Seminole White Manhood, Indians And Slaves, And The Second Seminole War Francis Mahan IV University of Central Florida Part of the History Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact STARS@ucf.edu. STARS Citation Mahan, Francis IV, "The Whiteman's Seminole White Manhood, Indians And Slaves, And The Second Seminole War" (2011). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 2078. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/2078 THE WHITEMAN‟S SEMINOLE: White Manhood, Indians and Slaves, and the Second Seminole War by FRANCIS E. MAHAN IV B.A. Pennsylvania State University, 2005 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History in the College of Arts and Humanities at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2011 © 2011 Francis E. Mahan IV ii ABSTRACT This study demonstrates that both government officials‟ and the settlers‟ perceptions of the Seminoles and Black Seminoles in Florida were highly influenced by their paternalistic and Jeffersonian world views. These perceptions also informed their policies concerning the Seminoles and Black Seminoles. The study is separated into three sections. The first chapter covers the years of 1820-1823.
    [Show full text]
  • Alcione M. Amos
    Alcione M. Amos THE LIFE OF LUIS FATIO PACHECO LAST SURVIVOR OF DADE’S BATTLE SEMINOLE WARS FOUNDATION, INC. Founded 1992 Pamphlet Series Vol. I, No. 1 2006 THE LIFE OF LUIS FATIO PACHECO LAST SURVIVOR OF DADE’S BATTLE By Alcione M. Amos Copyright © 2006 By Alcione M. Amos Frank Laumer Series Editor Seminole Wars Foundation, Inc. 35247 Reynolds St. Dade City, FL 33523 www.seminolewars.us Luis Fatio Pacheco Florida Times Union October 1892 Courtesy of the Library of Congress INTRODUCTION In the course of research on the Seminole Wars, a great deal of information can be found that has not seen the light of day for a century or two. While probing the records in an effort to recreate this period of Florida’s past in all its glory and shame, searching for clarification about an individual or a particular event, it is both rewarding and frustrating to find tantalizing hints of other information relating to the search, information that is pertinent to the subject but the very existence of which was unknown. Frustrating because following every lead would take a lifetime, yet there is no way of knowing where the trails might lead, what treasures of information might be found. As a case in point, this writer, searching the letter book of Captain Francis Belton (in command at Ft. Brooke in December, 1835) for the specific order that sent Major Dade on his doomed march, found a letter from Belton to General Clinch written at 9:00 A.M. on the 23rd, “...two companies have been put in motion this morning at reveille under the command of Bt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Race Ideology in Constructing Native American Identity
    Tribal Kulturkampf: The Role of Race Ideology in Constructing Native American Identity Carla D. Pratt∗ I. INTRODUCTION “Law is embroiled in the politics of identity. It names parties, defines their speech and conduct, and assigns their rights and duties. Its judgments declare, enjoin, and award the tangible and intangible benefits of race and racial privilege.”1 Law has been deeply involved in the politics of defining racial identity. The rule of hypo-descent,2 also known as the “one-drop rule,” was codified as law in many states in an effort to define the group of people who were black and therefore subject to the deprivation of liberty through the institution of slavery and later subject to social, economic, and educational subjugation through Jim Crow. Although the rule has been repealed from the statutory compilations of law in those states that once had such a rule, it continues to operate on a cognitive and cultural level in American law and society. On a social and cultural level, most Americans still perceive anyone with known African ancestry and the skin coloration, hair texture, or facial features that serve as evidence ∗ Assistant Professor of Law, Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law. This Essay was inspired by many of the presentations at the Ninth Annual LatCrit Conference, Villanova University School of Law, Villanova, Pa., Apr. 29, 2004–May 2, 2004, with particular inspiration being derived from the comments and writings of Professor Tanya Hernandez whose work in the area of Latina-Latino identity demonstrates how a race ideology that esteems whiteness and denigrates blackness has operated to construct Latina-Latino identity in a way that ultimately serves to advance the interests of white supremacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Historical Quarterly | Winter 2019 "White Supremacy
    Oregon Historical Quarterly Winter 2019 SPECIAL ISSUE White Supremacy & Resistance in this issue Violence on Tribal Peoples of the Oregon Coast; Settler Sovereignty Formation in Oregon; White Egalitarianism and the Oregon Donation Land Claim Act; George Williams’s Anti-Slavery Letter; Abolitionists in Oregon; Labor and White Right; Liberty Ships and Jim Crow Shipyards; Struggle to Admit African Americans into ILWU, Local 8; Nativism to White Power; The Murder of Mulugeta Seraw THIS PROGRAM, from the St. Rose Church Men’s Club’s ninth annual minstrel show, is an example of how OHS Research Library, Coll. 835 Library, OHS Research racism and White supremacy can take many forms that are accepted in mainstream society. As detailed in the program, participants dressed in blackface and performed skits for audiences in Portland, Oregon. Programs in the OHS Research Library collection indicate the church performed minstrel shows from the 1940s until at least 1950. During that time, the church moved the show from a single performance at Grant High School to two performances at Civic Auditorium. ON THE COVER: On May 26, 2017, White supremacist Jeremy Christian verbally attacked two young women, one wearing a hijab, on a light-rail train in Portland, Oregon. Three men intervened, and Christian killed Ricky Best and Taliesin Namkai-Meche, while severely injuring Micah Fletcher. In the days following the attack, a powerful, tangible response from the community developed at the Hollywood MAX station — a memorial to the victims that included chalk messages, photographs, candles, and flowers. Jackie Labrecque, then a reporter for KATU News, took this photograph at dawn after someone wrote, in pink chalk, Taliesin Namkai-Meche’s final words: “Please tell everyone on this train I love them.” The memorial, a response to tragedy, also provided hope through a resounding denouncement of hate.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Environmental Justice
    FEMINIST ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: CONFRONTING LEGACIES OF RACIAL SEGREGATION IN JUPITER, FLORIDA by Britni M Hiatt A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Wilkes Honors College in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts in Liberal Arts and Sciences with a Concentration in Women’s Studies Wilkes Honors College of Florida Atlantic University Jupiter, Florida April 2013 FEMINIST ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: CONFRONTING LEGACIES OF RACIAL SEGREGATION IN JUPITER, FLORIDA by Britni M Hiatt This thesis was prepared under the direction of the candidate’s thesis advisor, Dr. Wairimũ Njambi, and has been approved by the members of her supervisory committee. It was submitted to the faculty of The Honors College and was accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in Liberal Arts and Sciences. SUPERVISORY COMMITTEEE: _____________________________ Dr. Wairimũ Njambi _____________________________ Dr. William O’Brien _____________________________ Dean Jeffrey Buller, Wilkes Honors College __________________ Date ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis is dedicated to the brave and vibrant Limestone Creek community. Dr. Wairimũ Njambi—thank you for your leadership, wisdom, book lists, high standards, and everything I’ve learned about social justice with you in Women’s Studies. I am forever grateful and humbled. My Women’s Studies classmates—thank you. I treasure the academic triumphs and personal revelations we share. My family—thank you for supporting and inspiring my greatest accomplishments. Dr. William O’Brien—thank you for your dedicated second readership and for everything I’ve learned in your classes. Shout-outs: Professor Dorotha Lemeh, Lake Worth activists, Feminist Student Union, Stop Owlcatraz! Coalition, FAU community, and my cat Linus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Freedom Seeker
    Underground Railroad History Project of the Capital Region, Inc. The Freedom Seeker Volume Vl, No. 2 Summer 2009 The Seminole UGR By: Andor Skotnes erhaps the most successful episode of mass P escape from slavery in North America occurred, not along the well-known routes from South to North, but on a route from South to further south, into Florida. Those who escaped along this route, along with their allies, built the largest and most resilient independent community of former slaves in what became the US. And they mounted the most protracted and effective armed resistance ever against the British/US Slavocracy. This story of escape and resistance is the story of the Seminole people. The Seminoles first emerged as a distinct people in Spanish Florida during the mid 1700s, formed by groups from several Native American tribes and by fugitive Abraham, a Black Seminole leader slaves of African descent who were all refugees from from N. Orr's engraving published in 1848 in The Origin, Progress, and Conclusion of the Florida War by John T. Sprague, 1848 European colonialism. From their very beginnings, the http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Abraham-black-sem.jpg Seminoles were a bi-racial/ethnic people who war on the Seminoles, and the Seminoles again intermarried across lines of descent and blended African prevailed. and Indian cultures. The name Seminole was probably However, in the 1830s, a decade after Spain derived from the Spanish word cimarron (in English, seceded Florida to the US, the federal government maroon) which denotes a community of escaped slaves.
    [Show full text]