The Airship, History and Handling, 18 Oct 2002 Messrs Brian Hussey and Don Williams Spoke to Us on Airships

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Airship, History and Handling, 18 Oct 2002 Messrs Brian Hussey and Don Williams Spoke to Us on Airships The Airship, History and Handling, 18 Oct 2002 Messrs Brian Hussey and Don Williams spoke to us on Airships. They introduced us to the Airship Heritage Trust (based at Cardington) and the Airship Association. We were each given a copy of Engineering Technology, May 2001 in which Don Williams had an article on Airship Control by Remote Sensing. A Brief History - Brian Hussey The history of airships gives a good understanding of what they are, and of their associated problems. The first thoughts were in 1670 in Italy, when a gondola supported by four evacuated copper spheres about a metre in diameter was proposed – it would not have worked. The first people to fly were the Montgolfiers in their hot air balloon in 1783, heated by a bonfire on the ground - though they believed it was smoke that gave buoyancy, and used rather noisome fuel to produce it - its range was limited. Only eighteen months later the Channel was crossed, from Dover to Calais – troubles with lift meant that the crew had to throw out every portable thing, including their outer clothing. The first successful airship flew in 1898, designed by Santos Dumont who had designed a 3½ HP petrol engine for the purpose. He used one for personal transport round Paris… Airships typically fly at between 1000 and 2000 ft, lift being reduced at higher altitudes. Lift is provided by a lighter-than-air gas: hydrogen being lightest but flammable – particularly if contaminated by air leakage; the non-inflammable helium, though more expensive (10% of the cost of a new airship), is preferable and can be recycled. Germany, the most successful airship nation, generally used hydrogen – they were denied supplies by the USA in the late 1930s. The most successful was the Graf Zeppelin (1928-37) which travelled over a million miles without mishap to passengers or crew, although it could return with 2 - 3” lightning strike holes in the outer fabric and burn marks on the frame. (Gas bag holes could be patched in flight – there was usually plenty of time.) Blimps Non-rigid airships, inflated with hydrogen, were the first to be developed. Some early British ones were used for advertising – “Give Him Bovril” featured on one with “Give Her Bovril” on the other side – another read “Votes for Women”. The Royal Naval Air Service used blimps during the first world war for reconnaissance purposes. Flying one was said to be like waltzing with a jellyfish. With thrust from the propeller, control is by the fins and rudder, and trim adjustment by inflating the ballonets with air. BLIMP, length 90 ft Catenary LOAD CURTAIN Vertical Nose TOP FIN BATTENS Horizontal FIN and Control Surface Maximum Vertical Inflation LOWER FIN (with Air) and RUDDER Fore Aft BALLONET BALLONET Rigid Airships Count von Zeppelin was 62 when he started to design and make rigid airships at the turn of 20th century at Friedrichshafen by Lake Constance. The location is flat, with no mountains nearby. Germany used many Zeppelins in the first world war – for bombing – and, the Admiralty noticed, for observation at the battle of Jutland. At one time in 1916 there were 18 Zeppelins in the air – they came via the Happisburgh lightship, who informed the British authorities. After the war Zeppelins became available to the allies, most of whom used them as a basis for further work. In England R34 was built, and successfully flew to America and back. R38, modelled on a high altitude Zeppelin, probably without realising the implications, crashed during trials; this was designed to cope with low lift at high altitude and had a very light frame - it was not strong enough for more than gentle operation at low level. The British contribution to airship travel was the mooring mast, with a lift up the centre. The airship’s stern was moored to a heavy roller with its axis facing the mast, permitting some movement. R100 and R101 were built in 1929, for passenger travel to the Empire. The R100, with a duralumin lattice frame and gas bags sealed with a million goldbeaters skins (from the cattle trade in Chicago) was successful and flew to Quebec and back. But the R101, with a steel frame, and lengthened from its original design, crashed on its maiden flight to India when caught in a storm at Beauvais in France. This spelt the end of British airship travel. Germany continued to make Zeppelins, and after the Graf Zeppelin, made the Hindenburg in 1936. This was designed with cabins for 50, with a lounge and separate smoking room. There was elegant lightweight furniture and even an aluminium framed piano in the lounge. It plied the North Atlantic, until its second year when it burst into flames on being moored to the mast in New York – it is thought that leaking hydrogen was ignited by static electricity. That brought the end of passenger travel in rigid airships. The Future Airships do have their merits and design continues. Nowadays there are about 30 blimps in the world, inflated with helium; used for advertising, often fitted with internal lighting for extra effect at night. They also make good camera platforms, and can carry small numbers of passengers on sightseeing trips. Very high altitude airships are proposed for telecommunications or surveillance. High lift airships are being designed to avoid the need for roads when taking heavy plant to inaccessible sites: a 160 ton European Cargo Lifter, not necessarily an airship though currently it is, 853 ft long, needing 70m to complete development; in the USA ATG in Minesota are designing a twin hull SkyCat. The future of such airships is uncertain. Airship Handling - Don Williams Don Williams said he was an enthusiast but also sceptical. He spoke on three particular aspects: Position, Lift, and getting airships in and out of Hangars. Position Problems are mostly due to a lack of control, particularly near the ground. The GPS can say where you are, but getting an airship there and keeping it there is difficult. Despite now having engines with vector thrust, response is very slow - by the time a pilot has realised movement is happening it can be too late for corrective action. He suggested a means of detecting the first signs of airship movement by using half a dozen remote pilotless vehicles (RPVs), similar to drones already used for military purposes, orbiting the airship under its computer surveillance. Lift Blimps not only need gas for lift, but for it to be sufficiently pressurised to keep the shape - which reduces efficiency. The amount of lift required can vary not only with the load, but if rain adds weight, or as fuel is burnt. Fuel weight loss can be counteracted by letting off hydrogen – many early airship accidents are thought to be due to doing this in electrically stormy conditions (the success of the Graf Zeppelin was probably due to its use of a lightweight fuel giving it less need to let off hydrogen). One does not want to let off the relatively expensive helium; fuel weight can be maintained by condensing water from the exhaust, but there is then the weight of the condenser. Ballonets can be used, though in a rigid airship they would need to be stronger – modern plastics may be suitable. Lift can also be gained dynamically by raising the bow, and using forward motion as on an aeroplane. Hangar Entry/Exit Handling an airship on the ground can be fraught - a ground crew of 400 was laid on for the Hindenburg. Collision with the hangar would result in damage to an airship – there were frequent wreckages. The Zeppelin company made a floating hangar on Lake Constance and faced it into the wind when moving an airship in or out. However, even quite light gusts could still catch the airship, and move it horizontally or vertically – movements were usually done at 4am when winds were minimal. Mr Williams suggestion for this was to acquire outdated (cheap) turbine engines, and use a set of them to form an air funnel. Intermediate turbine/fans would probably be needed to give appropriate air speeds. Vote of Thanks The audience’s appetite being whetted, many questions followed [answers are incorporated in the above résumé ]. Mr Flemming thanked Brian Hussey and Don Williams for a fascinating talk. We were then invited to view various illustrations they had put out at the back of the room. And, if we wished, to purchase for £2.95 a book by Don Williams on a quite different subject, The Great No 1 Factory at Kingston, Surrey - where Sopwith aeroplanes were built in the first World War, then Trojan vehicles, and finally Hawker aeroplanes. The Society made a suitable donation to the Airship Heritage Trust. R J Buchanan The Hindenburg Disaster, 20 Dec 2002 This year we have had a talk on Airships, and another on Stress and Strain. During the Airship talk we heard of the R38. A spoil of the first world war was a high altitude Zeppelin designed with a very light frame to cope with low lift at high altitude - it was not strong enough for more than gentle operation at low level. The British used it as the basis for the R38, probably without realising the implications – it broke its frame and crashed during trials. Both topics came together a month ago when TV Channel 5 had a programme on the Hindenburg disaster in May 1937. Present day investigation techniques were applied to see what might have happened. Travelling the Hindenburg was said to be like magic - in luxury, floating silently in the air.
Recommended publications
  • Martin Mahony 3S Working Paper 2018-31
    ! HISTORICAL GEOGRAPHIES OF THE FUTURE: IMAGINATION, EXPECTATION AND PREDICTION IN THE MAKING OF IMPERIAL ATMOSPHERE Martin Mahony 3S Working Paper 2018-31 1 ! Established in early 2011, and building on a tradition of leading environmental social science research at UEA, we are a group of faculty, researchers and postgraduate students taking forward critical social science approaches to researching the social and political dimensions of environment and sustainability issues. The overall aim of the group is to conduct world-leading research that better understands, and can potentially transform, relations between science, policy and society in responding to the unprecedented sustainability challenges facing our world. In doing this our approach is: INTERDISCIPLINARY, working at the interface between science and technology studies, human geography and political science, as well as linking with the natural sciences and humanities; ENGAGED, working collaboratively with publics, communities, civil society organisations, government and business; and REFLEXIVE, through being theoretically informed, self-aware and constructively critical. Our work is organised around fve interrelated research strands: KNOWLEDGES AND EXPERTISE PARTICIPATION AND ENGAGEMENT SCIENCE, POLICY AND GOVERNANCE TRANSITIONS TO SUSTAINABILITY SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION Science, Society and Sustainability (3S) Research Group 3S researchers working across these strands focus School of Environmental Sciences on a range of topics and substantive issues including: University of
    [Show full text]
  • Airship Venture, Blackwood's Magazine May,1933
    N. S. Norway, The Airship Venture, Blackwood's Magazine May,1933. p.627 In the summer of 1924 there was a small Vickers’ staff working in two offices in Westminster upon the design of an airship, later to be christened R 100. I joined the staff in a humble capacity about that time, knowing nothing of airships but with a smattering of mathematics and the craft of heavier than air. I served with this staff till the autumn of 1930, when it was widely dispersed in the shadow of the R 101 disaster. In It is not often that the Gods in Olympus call the bluff of mortal theorists. The controversy of capitalism versus state enterprise has been argued, tested and fought out in many ways in many countries, but surely the airship venture in this country will stand as one of the most curious determinations of this matter. "Come," said the Gods, after wading through a number of airship proposals, "We will try this ancient question once again. The Air Ministry at Cardington shall build an airship of a certain size and of a certain speed, and Vickers Limited, shall build another to the same contract specification. By this ingenious device we really shall find out which is the better principle, capitalism or state enterprise." The Gods are then turned to other matters for the next six years while the experiment germinated. I joined the capitalist ship. For 18 months we worked in Westminster and in the drawing office we had set up at Crayford in Kent, before construction was commenced.
    [Show full text]
  • The Airships
    BY: Arjumand-Bano The Airships By Arjumand Bano (13005001010) Research Supervisor: Sir Kalim- Ur- Rehman A Research Project Submitted to Aviation Management In Partial fulfillment of requirement of Degree of Aviation Management Department of Institute of Aviation Studies University of Management and Technology Johar Town, Lahore May, 2017 Preface his project “The Airships” is done as a part of BS Aviation Management which has to be done in last semester in University of Management and T Technology, Lahore. I am glad to dedicate this project to Sir Kalim- Ur- Rehman which is project supervisor and without their guidance this project cannot be done competently. I am thankful to my parents and teachers who guided me in this project. For preparing the project I studied different websites related to airships. The data related to airships is easily available on internet. The research is based on airships types, its history, construction, biographies, modern airships etc. I tried my level best to put maximum information related to airships and keep the project from inaccuracies. If this project can help anyone to increase his/her information and knowledge I will feel that the purpose of my hard work has been achieved. ------------------------- Arjumand-Bano ID: 13005001010 Batch#5 Email: [email protected] BS Aviation Management (2013-2017) University of Management and Technology, Lahore. Acknowledgement t is genuine pleasure to express my deep sense of thanks and gratitude to supervisor Sir Kalim- Ur -Rehman. Their keen interest and dedication above I all their overwhelming attitude to help their students had been solely and largely responsible for completing my work.
    [Show full text]
  • T.L. Blakemore Collection Lighter-Than-Air Box 1 1 Correspondence 1919-1929 2 Index: LTA Craft Photographs Vol. 1 & 2 N.D. 3
    T.L. Blakemore Collection Lighter-Than-Air Box 1 1 Correspondence 1919-1929 2 Index: LTA Craft photographs Vol. 1 & 2 n.d. 3 "A" type airship n.d. 4 "AC" type airship 1922 5 "C" type airships n.d. 6 Santos Dumont - non rigid 1910 7 Car for "F" type airship (Navy) 1918 8 Goodyear Commercial motor balloon n.d. 9 "J" type airship n.d. 10 "J" type airship: Instrument board 1922 11 "J" type airship: Instrument Board n.d. 12 Photographs: J-6 engine outrigger for J-4 non-rigid 1933 13 Kite balloon: (Observation) 1920 14 Photographs Goodyear Pilgrim airship 1925 15 Photographs Roma Airship n.d. 16 Photographs RS-1 airship n.d. 17 Photographs "TC" type airship 1924 18 Photographs "TC" Instrument panels n.d. 19 Photographs "TC-11"control car n.d. 20 Photographs "TC-11" 1929 21 Photographs "TC" water model, AC Car n.d. 22 Photographs "TC" water model, TC car n.d. 23 Photographs "TC" or Los Angeles 1927 24 Photographs "TE" type airship n.d. 25 Photographs U.S. Army airship 1927 26 Photographs Zodiac 1920 27 Photograph Unidentified airship n.d. 28 Photograph Unidentified airship n.d. 29 Photograph Unidentified airship n.d. 30 Photograph Unidentified airship n.d. 31 Photograph U.S.S. Los Angeles n.d. 32 Photograph Airship car and motor n.d. 33 Photograph Airship car 1924 34 Photograph Engine car n.d. 35 Photograph Parts 1921 36 Photograph Left engine air starter 1926 37 Photograph Fabric n.d. 38 Photograph Components: Gas cell, Aero marine n.d plane & motor (docking device) 39 Photograph Mobile yaw guy winch 1933 40 Photograph Docking rail with trolley, mooring system n.d.
    [Show full text]
  • HM Airship R100
    HM Airship R100 HM Airship R100 was a privately designed and built rigid airship, part of a competition to develop new techniques for a projected larger commercial airship for use on British Empire routes. The other airship, the R101, was built by the Air Ministry. Both projects were funded by the British Government. First flight On December 16, 1929, the R100 made its maiden flight from the Royal Naval Air Station in Howden, Yorkshire, where it had been built by a subsidiary of Vickers-Armstrong. It initially flew to York and then continued on to Cardington, Bedfordshire, where the Government Airship Establishment was located. On January 16, 1930, the R100 achieved a speed of 81 mph (130 km/h), making it the fastest airship in the world. The R100 at the mooring mast in Bedforshire Transatlantic Voyage to Canada Originally the R100's contract required a demonstration flight to India. However, the decision to use gasoline engines, rather than the diesel engines originally specified prompted a change in destination to Canada as it was reasoned that a gasoline-powered flight to the tropics was deemed to be too dangerous. Once the R100 was formally handed over to the Air Ministry, a number of modifications were made in preparation for her transatlantic flight. During her last flight the tail fairing had collapsed due to aerodynamic pressures and her pointed tail was modified to a more rounded form, shortening her length by 15 ft (4.6 m). The English airship R100 on mooring mast in St Hubert, Quebec The R100 departed for Canada on July 29, 1930, arriving in Saint-Hubert, Quebec 78 hours later, having flown 3,300 mi (5,300 km) at an average speed of 42 mph (68 km/h).
    [Show full text]
  • The R.101 Story: a Review Based on Primary Source Material and First Hand Accounts
    Journal of Aeronautical History Paper No. 2015/02 The R.101 story: a review based on primary source material and first hand accounts by Peter Davison BA(hons) AMRAeS The editorial assistance of Dr Giles Camplin and Mr Crispin Rope is acknowledged. Abstract The airship R.101 was designed and built at the Royal Airship Works, Cardington, under the Imperial Airship Scheme, to shorten journey times to the Dominions. It crashed near Beauvais in northern France at 2.08am on 5th October 1930 while on a proving flight to Karachi (then in India). After hitting the ground, the airship caught fire, killing 48 of the 54 persons on board, including the Secretary of State for Air, Lord Christopher Thomson. This paper describes the development of the R.101, the background to the Imperial Airship Scheme, the accident and the subsequent Inquiry, largely through quotations from contemporary documents, both official and personal, and interviews with people involved. Preface This paper is the result of a long period of research into the circumstances relating to the Imperial Airship Scheme and the loss of the R.101 in October 1930 during a proving flight to India. Rather than subject myself to the limitations of commercial publishing and with regard to the limited market for the subject at this depth, the authors have decided to place unbound copies with the major archives in the UK for the benefit of future researchers. The paper cannot be conclusive due to uncertainty over the precise cause of the accident and the loss of all those on board with detailed knowledge of the final few minutes over France.
    [Show full text]
  • Airships to the Arctic Symposium Ii
    AIRSHIPS TO THE ARCTIC SYMPOSIUM II MOVING BEYOND THE ROADS OCTOBER 21-23, 2003 Presented by: Symposium Sponsors: The University of Manitoba Transport Canada Transport Institute Manitoba Transportation & Government Services Western Economic Diversification Manitoba Hydro Manitoba Chambers of Commerce Winnipeg Airports Authority The University of Manitoba Transport Institute MOVING BEYOND THE ROADS Airships to the Arctic Symposium II PROCEEDINGS Held at the Fort Garry Hotel, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada October 21-23, 2003 Edited by: Dr. Barry E. Prentice Jill Winograd Al Phillips Bobbi Harrison ISBN 1-894218-36-1 University of Manitoba Transport Institute 2003 Airships to the Arctic II Symposium 2 2003 Airships to the Arctic II Symposium DEDICATED TO BRIGADIER GENERAL KEITH GREENAWAY The Airships to the Arctic II was honoured to have Brigadier General Keith Greenaway speak at our opening public lecture and contribute to our deliberations. General Greenaway’s biography is attached in which you will see the documentation of an airman who is a pioneer in Arctic aviation. General Greenaway is the only Canadian who has crossed our Arctic Circle in a military airship. This was 46 years ago, aboard a U.S. Navy blimp, on a record-setting trip that has yet to be matched.1 General Greenaway is proof that Canada has a history of airship voyages in the north. He is confident that airships have a future in the north. He suggests eco-tourism in the Arctic Archipelago and airship mining in the north as two promising markets. As a pioneer, as an expert, and as an inspiration, the proceedings of the Airships to the Arctic II are dedicated to Brigadier General Keith Greenaway.
    [Show full text]
  • Airships in International Affairs, 1890–1940 Also by John Duggan
    Airships in International Affairs, 1890–1940 Also by John Duggan LZ 130 GRAF ZEPPELIN AND THE END OF COMMERCIAL AIRSHIP TRAVEL (with Manfred Bauer) COMMERCIAL ZEPPELIN FLIGHTS TO SOUTH AMERICA (with Jim Graue) ZEPPELINPOST LZ 130 (with Gisela Woodward) GRAF ZEPPELIN FLIGHTS TO ENGLAND GRAF ZEPPELIN FLIGHTS TO THE BALKANS GRAF ZEPPELIN POLAR POST (with Gisela Woodward) Also by Henry Cord Meyer COUNT ZEPPELIN: A Psychological Portrait AIRSHIPMEN, BUSINESSMEN AND POLITICS, 1890–1940 THE LONG GENERATION: Germany from Empire to Ruin, 1913–1946 FIVE IMAGES OF GERMANY: Half a Century of American Views on German History MITTELEUROPA IN GERMAN THOUGHT AND ACTION, 1815–1945 Airships in International Affairs, 1890–1940 John Duggan Management Consultant specializing in Oil Industry Economics and Henry Cord Meyer Research Professor Emeritus University of California Irvine © John Duggan and Henry Cord Meyer 2001 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2001 978-0-333-75128-2 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1P 0LP. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Control, Response and Crash of HMA R.101.Pdf
    Journal of Aeronautical History Draft 7 April 2018 Paper No. 2018/05 Control, Response and Crash of HMA R.101 Bryan Lawton Abstract The equations of motion of the R.101 airship, as derived and applied by the National Physical Laboratory in simulating the airship’s disaster for the Court of Inquiry in 1930, are used to illustrate some aspects of the airship’s stability, control and crash. The ship proved to be quite able to recover from the loss of one (or more) gas bags. It is shown that the airship’s first dive was caused by the failure of the forward gas bags, from which it was recovering when the elevator cable broke. The crew successfully attempted a soft landing, but a fire subsequently destroyed the ship and all aboard except for six of the crew. It was always known that the elevator cable broke, but the Court of Inquiry thought it happened during the subsequent fire and could not be a cause of the crash. Consequently, the NPL was unable to show that the airship impacted the ground at the expected angle of 15 - 25 o nose down. The computations made here demonstrate that such an impact is possible if the elevator cable broke as the airship was pulling out of the first dive. It is the simplest explanation of the tragedy that fits the known facts. 1. Introduction In their work on modelling the behaviour of the R.101 airship during her final and fatal descent, the National Physical Laboratory made wind tunnel measurements of the lift, drag, lifting moment and damping forces on a model of the airship and used these in solving the relevant equations of motion 1, 2.
    [Show full text]