Working Group on Marine Mammal Ecology (Wgmme)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Working Group on Marine Mammal Ecology (Wgmme) WORKING GROUP ON MARINE MAMMAL ECOLOGY (WGMME) VOLUME 2 | ISSUE 39 ICES SCIENTIFIC REPORTS RAPPORTS SCIENTIFIQUES DU CIEM ICES INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR THE EXPLORATION OF THE SEA CIEM CONSEIL INTERNATIONAL POUR L’EXPLORATION DE LA MER ICES Scientific Reports Volume 2 | Issue 39 WORKING GROUP ON MARINE MAMMAL ECOLOGY (WGMME) Recommended format for purpose of citation: ICES. 2020. Working Group on Marine Mammal Ecology (WGMME). ICES Scientific Reports. 2:39. 85 pp. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5975 Editors Anders Galatius • Anita Gilles Authors Markus Ahola • Matthieu Authier • Sophie Brasseur • Julia Carlström • Farah Chaudry • Ross Culloch • Peter Evans • Anders Galatius • Steve Geelhoed • Anita Gilles • Philip Hammond • Ailbhe Kavanagh • Karl Lundström • Kelly Macleod • Abbo van Neer • Kjell Nilssen • Graham Pierce • Janneke Ransijn • Bob Rumes • Begoña Santos ICES | WGMME 2020 | I Contents i Executive summary .......................................................................................................................iii ii Expert group information ..............................................................................................................iv 1 ToR A. Review and report on any new information on seal and cetacean population abundance, population/stock structure, management frameworks (including indicators and targets for MSFD assessments), and anthropogenic threats to individual health and population status........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 New abundance and distribution information ................................................................ 1 1.1.1 Seal abundance and distribution ..................................................................................... 1 1.1.1.1 Abundance, Iceland ......................................................................................................... 4 1.1.1.2 Abundance, Baltic Sea ...................................................................................................... 6 1.1.1.3 Abundance, Atlantic Scandinavia ................................................................................... 10 1.1.1.4 Abundance, Continental coast, Wadden Sea to France ................................................. 12 1.1.1.5 Abundance, UK .............................................................................................................. 15 1.1.1.6 Abundance, North America ........................................................................................... 17 1.1.1.7 New information on seal distribution ............................................................................ 18 1.2 Cetacean abundance and distribution ........................................................................... 19 1.2.1 Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) of harbour porpoises in the Baltic Sea .................. 19 1.2.1.1 Visual monitoring and strandings .................................................................................. 20 1.3 Management frameworks (including indicators and targets for MSFD assessments) .................................................................................................................. 32 1.3.1 Seal management frameworks ...................................................................................... 32 1.3.2 Cetacean Management frameworks (including indicators and targets for MSFD assessments) .................................................................................................................. 33 1.4 New information on anthropogenic threats .................................................................. 34 1.4.1 Update on cumulative effects ........................................................................................ 34 1.4.2 Foodweb ........................................................................................................................ 34 1.4.3 Fishery bycatch .............................................................................................................. 35 1.4.4 Pollution ......................................................................................................................... 35 1.4.5 Underwater noise .......................................................................................................... 36 1.4.6 Disturbance .................................................................................................................... 41 1.5 References ..................................................................................................................... 41 2 ToR B. Review foraging areas and estimate consumption by relevant seal and cetacean species in case study areas .......................................................................................................... 48 2.1 References ..................................................................................................................... 56 3 ToRC. Review selected aspects of marine mammalfishery interactions. Details of this ToR to be agreed with WGBYC ........................................................................................................... 60 3.1 Conservation objectives and targets with respect to maximum mortality ................... 60 3.2 New legislation at the European Union level ................................................................. 61 3.3 Stranding records of marine mammals.......................................................................... 62 3.3.1 Country by country stranding information .................................................................... 63 3.4 Seal fisheries interactions .............................................................................................. 67 3.5 References ..................................................................................................................... 73 4 ToR D. Update the database for seals ......................................................................................... 76 4.1 The ‘ICES/WGMME seal database’ ................................................................................ 76 4.2 Other species and missing areas .................................................................................... 76 4.3 References ..................................................................................................................... 80 5 ToR E. Address the special request from EU on emergency measures bycatch Northeast Atlantic by: .................................................................................................................................. 81 Annex 1: List of participants.......................................................................................................... 82 Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................... 84 ii | ICES SCIENTIFIC REPORTS 2: 39 | ICES Annex 2: Resolutions .................................................................................................................... 85 ToRs 2020 .................................................................................................................................... 85 ICES | WGMME 2020 | III i Executive summary The Working Group on Marine Mammal Ecology (WGMME) meeting 2020 was chaired remotely by Anita Gilles (Germany) and Anders Galatius (Denmark) and on-site chairs Matthieu Authier (France) and Ross Culloch (Scotland, UK). Two terms of references were standing ToRs; under the first of these, ToR A, new and updated information on seal and cetacean population abundance, population/stock structure, manage- ment frameworks as well as anthropogenic threats to individual health and population status were reviewed. The latest abundance data on harbour, grey and ringed seals are also reviewed under this ToR along with findings on threats to marine mammals such as bycatch, pollution, marine debris and noise. ToR B arose to facilitate the work of WGBIOIV’s ToR A; “Investigate mechanisms linking trophic guilds under contrasting levels of pressure and/or primary production in case study areas”. The initial focus of work should be on harbour porpoise, grey seal and harbour seal in the North Sea as a case study and, therefore, a number of recent studies addressing diet, foraging distribution and trophic interactions were reviewed. Additionally, an overview of published and un- published data on diet and distribution of marine mammals in the North Sea was synthesized. ToR C was implemented to review aspects of marine mammal-fishery interactions not covered by ICES WGBYC. In 2020, WGMME focused its efforts on i) reviewing conservation objectives with respect to maximum mortality since the lack of conservation targets was identified as hin- dering the ability to address marine mammal-fisheries interactions, ii) assessing the use of stranding records as a source of information to identify abnormal mortality and possible rela- tions to fisheries. A country-by-country review of current stranding network activities was in- cluded. ToR D, updating the database for seals, is the second standing term of reference. The database format generated in 2019 was updated with the most recent data on seal abundance. IV | ICES SCIENTIFIC REPORTS 2:39 | ICES ii Expert group information Expert group name Working Group on Marine Mammal Ecology (WGMME) Expert group cycle Annual Year cycle started 2020 Reporting year in cycle 1/1 Chairs Anita
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 20: Protecting Marine Mammals and Endangered Marine Species
    Preliminary Report CHAPTER 20: PROTECTING MARINE MAMMALS AND ENDANGERED MARINE SPECIES Protection for marine mammals and endangered or threatened species from direct impacts has increased since the enactment of the Marine Mammal Protection Act in 1972 and the Endangered Species Act in 1973. However, lack of scientific data, confusion about permitting requirements, and failure to adopt a more ecosystem-based management approach have created inconsistent and inefficient protection efforts, particularly from indirect and cumulative impacts. Consolidating and coordinating federal jurisdictional authorities, clarifying permitting and review requirements for activities that may impact marine mammals and endangered or threatened species, increasing scientific research and public education, and actively pursuing international measures to protect these species are all improvements that will promote better stewardship of marine mammals, endangered or threatened species, and the marine ecosystem. ASSESSING THE THREATS TO MARINE POPULATIONS Because of their intelligence, visibility and frequent interactions with humans, marine mammals hold a special place in the minds of most people. Little wonder, then, that mammals are afforded a higher level of protection than fish or other marine organisms. They are, however, affected and harmed by a wide range of human activities. The biggest threat to marine mammals worldwide today is their accidental capture or entanglement in fishing gear (known as “bycatch”), killing hundreds of thousands of animals a year.1 Dolphins, porpoises and small whales often drown when tangled in a net or a fishing line because they are not able to surface for air. Even large whales can become entangled and tow nets or other gear for long periods, leading to the mammal’s injury, exhaustion, or death.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 1, Dec 2019 Distribution and Abundance in India
    OCEAN DIGEST Quarterly Newsletter of the Ocean Society of India Volume 6 | Issue 1 | Dec 2019 | ISSN 2394-1928 Ocean Digest Quarterly Newsletter of the Ocean Society of India Marine Mammals — Indian Scenario Chandrasekar Krishnamoorthy Centre for Marine Living Resources & Ecology Ministry of Earth Sciences, Kochi arine mammals, the most amazing marine organisms on earth, are often referred to as “sentinels” of ocean Porpoising - Striped dolphin health.M These include approximately 127 species belonging to three major taxonomic orders, namely Cetacea (whales, dolphins, and porpoises), Sirenia (manatees and dugong) and Carnivora (sea otters, polar bears and pinnipeds) (Jefferson et al., 2008). These organisms are known to inhabit oceans and seas, as well as estuaries, and are distributed from the polar to the tropical regions. These organisms are the top predators in many ocean food webs except the sirenians, which are herbivores. However, cetaceans become the dominant group of marine mammals, as well as widest geographic range. Marine mammals have been deemed “invaluable components” of the naval force as their natural senses are superior to technology in rough weather and noisy areas. India, with a rich diversity of marine mammals has a history of documenting these animals for the last 200 years. Leaping - Spinner dolphin However, until the year 2003, information on these organisms in our seas was restricted to incidental capture by fishing gears and stranding records (Vivekanandan and Jeyachandran, 2012). Published reports indicate that only a few scientific studies have addressed the distribution of marine mammals in the Indian EEZ, and there exist huge lacunae on the baseline information such as abundance and density for many species due to limited resources and lack of systematic surveys.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CASE AGAINST Marine Mammals in Captivity Authors: Naomi A
    s l a m m a y t T i M S N v I i A e G t A n i p E S r a A C a C E H n T M i THE CASE AGAINST Marine Mammals in Captivity The Humane Society of the United State s/ World Society for the Protection of Animals 2009 1 1 1 2 0 A M , n o t s o g B r o . 1 a 0 s 2 u - e a t i p s u S w , t e e r t S h t u o S 9 8 THE CASE AGAINST Marine Mammals in Captivity Authors: Naomi A. Rose, E.C.M. Parsons, and Richard Farinato, 4th edition Editors: Naomi A. Rose and Debra Firmani, 4th edition ©2009 The Humane Society of the United States and the World Society for the Protection of Animals. All rights reserved. ©2008 The HSUS. All rights reserved. Printed on recycled paper, acid free and elemental chlorine free, with soy-based ink. Cover: ©iStockphoto.com/Ying Ying Wong Overview n the debate over marine mammals in captivity, the of the natural environment. The truth is that marine mammals have evolved physically and behaviorally to survive these rigors. public display industry maintains that marine mammal For example, nearly every kind of marine mammal, from sea lion Iexhibits serve a valuable conservation function, people to dolphin, travels large distances daily in a search for food. In learn important information from seeing live animals, and captivity, natural feeding and foraging patterns are completely lost.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter
    TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF REMEDIATION OAK RIDGE OFFICE ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLAN July 2018 June 2019 Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, Authorization No. 327023 June 29, 2018 Pursuant to the State of Tennessee’s policy of non-discrimination, the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation does not discriminate on the basis of race, sex, religion, color, national or ethnic origin, age, disability, or military service in its policies, or in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in its programs, services or activities. Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action inquiries or complaints should be directed to the EEO/AA coordinator, Office of General Counsel, William R. Snodgrass Tennessee Tower 2nd Floor, 312 Rosa L. Parks Avenue, Nashville, TN 37243, 1-888-867-7455. ADA inquiries or complaints should be directed to the ADAAA coordinator, William Snodgrass Tennessee Tower 2nd Floor, 312 Rosa Parks Avenue, Nashville, TN 37243, 1-866-253-5827. Hearing impaired callers may use the Tennessee Relay Service 1-800-848-0298. To reach your local ENVIRONMENTAL ASSISTANCE CENTER Call 1-888-891-8332 or 1-888-891-TDEC This plan was published with 100% federal funds DE-EM0001620 DE-EM0001621 Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, Authorization No. 327023 June 29, 2018 Executive Summary The Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC), Division of Remediation (DoR), Oak Ridge Office (ORO), submits its FY 2019 Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMP) in accordance with the Environmental Surveillance and Oversight Agreement (ESOA) between the United States Department of Energy (DOE) and the State of Tennessee; and where applicable, the Federal Facilities Agreement (FFA) between the DOE, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the State of Tennessee.
    [Show full text]
  • TDEC 2014- TN5288--TDEC 2013-Environmental-Monitoring
    TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DOE OVERSIGHT OFFICE ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT JANUARY through DECEMBER 2013 Pursuant to the State of Tennessee’s policy of non-discrimination, the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation does not discriminate on the basis of race, sex, religion, color, national or ethnic origin, age, disability, or military service in its policies, or in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in its programs, services or activities. Equal employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action inquiries or complaints should be directed to the EEO/AA Coordinator, Office of General Counsel, 401 Church Street, 20th Floor, L & C Tower, Nashville, TN 37243, 1-888-867-7455. ADA inquiries or complaints should be directed to the ADA Coordinator, Human Resources Division, 401 Church Street, 12th Floor, L & C Tower, Nashville, TN 37243, 1-888- 253-5827. Hearing impaired callers may use the Tennessee Relay Service 1-800-848-0298. To reach your local ENVIRONMENTAL ASSISTANCE CENTER Call 1-888-891-8332 OR 1-888-891-TDEC This report was published With 100% Federal Funds DE-EM0001621 DE-EM0001620 Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, Authorization April 2014 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS …………………………………………………………………………….3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………………4 ACRONYMS …………………………………………………………………………………………15 INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………………19 AIR QUALITY MONITORING Monitoring of Hazardous Air Pollutants on the Oak Ridge Reservation .……………………………..23 RadNet
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Mammals and Sea Turtles of the Mediterranean and Black Seas
    Marine mammals and sea turtles of the Mediterranean and Black Seas MEDITERRANEAN AND BLACK SEA BASINS Main seas, straits and gulfs in the Mediterranean and Black Sea basins, together with locations mentioned in the text for the distribution of marine mammals and sea turtles Ukraine Russia SEA OF AZOV Kerch Strait Crimea Romania Georgia Slovenia France Croatia BLACK SEA Bosnia & Herzegovina Bulgaria Monaco Bosphorus LIGURIAN SEA Montenegro Strait Pelagos Sanctuary Gulf of Italy Lion ADRIATIC SEA Albania Corsica Drini Bay Spain Dardanelles Strait Greece BALEARIC SEA Turkey Sardinia Algerian- TYRRHENIAN SEA AEGEAN SEA Balearic Islands Provençal IONIAN SEA Syria Basin Strait of Sicily Cyprus Strait of Sicily Gibraltar ALBORAN SEA Hellenic Trench Lebanon Tunisia Malta LEVANTINE SEA Israel Algeria West Morocco Bank Tunisian Plateau/Gulf of SirteMEDITERRANEAN SEA Gaza Strip Jordan Suez Canal Egypt Gulf of Sirte Libya RED SEA Marine mammals and sea turtles of the Mediterranean and Black Seas Compiled by María del Mar Otero and Michela Conigliaro The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN. Published by Compiled by María del Mar Otero IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation, Spain © IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, and Malaga, Spain Michela Conigliaro IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation, Spain Copyright © 2012 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources With the support of Catherine Numa IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation, Spain Annabelle Cuttelod IUCN Species Programme, United Kingdom Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the sources are fully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Whale Tales: Cetacean Stranding Reponse and Medicine in the Pacific Northwest
    Proceedings of the 2012 North American Veterinary Conference, Orlando, Florida WHALE TALES: CETACEAN STRANDING REPONSE AND MEDICINE IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST Joseph K. Gaydos, VMD, PhD UC Davis Wildlife Health Center – Orcas Island Office Eastsound, Washington MARINE MAMMAL STRANDINGS: Marine mammal strandings have long attracted the attention of the general public.1 Stranded marine mammal carcasses once were used as food and some of the first laws enacted in New England Colonies were to establish the ownership of beached whale carcasses. Later stranded marine mammals provided animals for museums, live displays and scientific information about little-known species. Today they still provide us with important data on marine mammals and marine mammal populations. Strandings help us to document range expansions for marine mammal species and provide details on marine mammal growth rates, age at maturity, gestation, reproductive season and longevity. Stranded marine mammals also help expand our understanding of marine mammal mortality factors including infectious diseases, toxins and human-caused mortality. In the United States, the Marine Mammal Protection Act (1972) gave the federal government jurisdiction over marine mammals, including stranded ones. An amendment in 1992 established a Marine Mammal Health and Stranding Response Program to (1) facilitate the collection and dissemination of reference data on the health of marine mammals and health trends of marine mammals in the wild; (2) correlate the health of marine mammals and marine mammal populations, in the wild, with available data on physical, chemical, and biological environmental parameters; and (3) coordinate effective responses to unusual mortality events by establishing a process in the Department of Commerce.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Impacts of Anthropogenic Underwater Sound in the Marine Environment
    Overview of the impacts of anthropogenic underwater sound in the marine environment Biodiversity Series 2009 Overview of the impacts of anthropogenic underwater sound in the marine environment OSPAR Convention Convention OSPAR The Convention for the Protection of the La Convention pour la protection du milieu Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic marin de l'Atlantique du Nord-Est, dite (the “OSPAR Convention”) was opened for Convention OSPAR, a été ouverte à la signature at the Ministerial Meeting of the signature à la réunion ministérielle des former Oslo and Paris Commissions in Paris anciennes Commissions d'Oslo et de Paris, on 22 September 1992. The Convention à Paris le 22 septembre 1992. La Convention entered into force on 25 March 1998. It has est entrée en vigueur le 25 mars 1998. been ratified by Belgium, Denmark, Finland, La Convention a été ratifiée par l'Allemagne, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, la Belgique, le Danemark, la Finlande, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, la France, l’Irlande, l’Islande, le Luxembourg, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom la Norvège, les Pays-Bas, le Portugal, and approved by the European Community le Royaume-Uni de Grande Bretagne and Spain. et d’Irlande du Nord, la Suède et la Suisse et approuvée par la Communauté européenne et l’Espagne. 2 OSPAR Commission, 2009 Acknowledgements Author list (in alphabetical order) Thomas Götz Scottish Oceans Institute, East Sands University of St Andrews St Andrews, Fife KY16 8LB [email protected] Module 2, 8 Gordon Hastie SMRU Limited New Technology Centre North Haugh St Andrews, Fife KY16 9SR [email protected] Module 2, 8 Leila T.
    [Show full text]
  • Bilag 6 UNESCO Verdensarv Vadehavets Design Værktøjskasse
    Verdensarv Vadehavet Værktøjskasse til interessenter om formidling og markedsføring Start Om værktøjskassen .................................... 3 Brandingbeskeder ....................................................... 18 Brandingstatement ................................... 20 Hvem er værkstøjskassen 4 Hovedpunkter................................................... 21 henvendt til? ....................................................... Fakta-ark .............................................................. 22 Information om brandet Fotobibliotek ..................................................... 25 Verdensarv Vadehavet ............................ 6 Brandingmanual ............................ 7 Brug af logo ........................................................................ 26 Brandingfakta-ark ......................... 7 Kommerciel brug - varemærkelicensaftale .............................. 28 Præsentationsslides ..................... 7 Ikke-kommerciel brug ............................... 28 Markedsføringsmateriale ..................... 8 Redaktionelt indhold ................. 28 Plakater .................................................... 9 In-side logo ........................................ 28 Brochure ................................................. 10 ............................................ 29 Annonce .................................................. 12 Merchandise med logo Video ......................................................... 13 Online Banner .................................... 14 Udstillingspaneler
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Natural and Anthropogenic Sound Sources and Acoustic Propagation in the North Sea
    UNCLASSIFIED Oude Waalsdorperweg 63 P.O. Box 96864 2509 JG The Hague The Netherlands TNO report www.tno.nl TNO-DV 2009 C085 T +31 70 374 00 00 F +31 70 328 09 61 [email protected] Assessment of natural and anthropogenic sound sources and acoustic propagation in the North Sea Date February 2009 Author(s) Dr. M.A. Ainslie, Dr. C.A.F. de Jong, Dr. H.S. Dol, Dr. G. Blacquière, Dr. C. Marasini Assignor The Netherlands Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Affairs; Directorate-General for Water Affairs Project number 032.16228 Classification report Unclassified Title Unclassified Abstract Unclassified Report text Unclassified Appendices Unclassified Number of pages 110 (incl. appendices) Number of appendices 1 All rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced and/or published in any form by print, photoprint, microfilm or any other means without the previous written permission from TNO. All information which is classified according to Dutch regulations shall be treated by the recipient in the same way as classified information of corresponding value in his own country. No part of this information will be disclosed to any third party. In case this report was drafted on instructions, the rights and obligations of contracting parties are subject to either the Standard Conditions for Research Instructions given to TNO, or the relevant agreement concluded between the contracting parties. Submitting the report for inspection to parties who have a direct interest is permitted. © 2009 TNO Summary Title : Assessment of natural and anthropogenic sound sources and acoustic propagation in the North Sea Author(s) : Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Mammals of the US North Pacific & Arctic
    Marine Mammals of the US North Pacific & Arctic 10 METER 0 10 FEET adult male Resident Killer Whale Blue Whale Orcinus orca subsp. Balaenoptera musculus adult female calf Bigg’s (transient) Killer Whale Orcinus orca subsp. Fin Whale Balaenoptera physalus Beluga or White Whale Delphinapterus leucas Sei Whale Balaenoptera borealis Sperm Whale Physeter macrocephalus adult female North Pacific Right Whale adult male Eubalaena japonica Baird’s Beaked Whale Berardius bairdii Minke Whale Balaenoptera acutorostrata Bowhead Whale Balaena mysticetus Cuvier’s Beaked Whale Ziphius cavirostris adult male Gray Whale Humpback Whale Eschrichtius robustus Megaptera novaeangliae adult female 180º 160ºW 140ºW calf ARCTIC OCEAN Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) Stejneger’s Beaked Whale Beaufort Mesoplodon stejnegeri Sea In 1972, Congress enacted the NOAA Fisheries and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service are Chukchi 70ºN the lead federal agencies for enforcing this law to protect Design and illustrations: Uko Gorter (www.ukogorter.com) Sea MMPA, establishing a national Arctic Circle marine mammals. The MMPA protects all whales, dolphins, Alaska policy to help prevent the seals, sea lions, porpoises, manatees, polar bears, otters, NOAA Fisheries extinction or depletion of and walruses from human-induced harm. In the United Alaska Region States, NOAA Fisheries works with scientists, industry, and 60ºN 907-586-7221 Bering Sea Gulf of marine mammal populations conservation groups to develop measures that help to protect Alaska Alaska Fisheries Science Center from human activities. marine mammals from entanglement, ship strike, and other 206-526-4000 PACIFIC OCEAN activities that might cause these animals harm. TO REPORT STRANDED, ENTANGLED, INJURED, OR DEAD MARINE MAMMALS, CALL: NOAA FISHERIES 1-877-925-7773; ALASKA SEALIFE CENTER 1-888-774-7325 (SEAL); U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Natur- Und Umweltschutz Zeitschrift Der Naturschuĵ - Und Forschungsgemeinschaft Der Mellumrat E.V
    Natur- und Umweltschutz Zeitschrift der Naturschuĵ - und Forschungsgemeinschaft Der Mellumrat e.V. Band 19 – Heft 1 – 2020 Der Mellumrat e.V. - Natur- und Umweltschuĵ Band 19 – Heft 1 – 2020 Inhaltsverzeichnis Editorial ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Aus dem Verein A. Tuinmann 155. Mitgliederversammlung des Mellumrats e.V. ..................................................... 4 Aus der Redaktion Der Müllkoffer geht an den Start! ............................................................................ 6 Aus der Redaktion Die Beauftragten für die Insel Mellum ...................................................................... 7 Aus der Redaktion Der Ombudsmann für die Küstenbotanik – Norbert Hecker...................................... 8 Aus der Redaktion Ankündigungen und Termine ................................................................................... 11 Aus Wissenschaft und Forschung R. Niedringhaus & M. Voßkuhl Das große Krabbeln – Die Fauna der Insel Mellum ............................................... 12 R. Schöneich-Argent & H. Freund Was Holzdrifter über die Vermüllung von Mellum, Minsener Oog und Wangerooge verraten ............................................................................................... 15 M. Röttgen, N. Knipping & Vermüllte Kinderstube – Eine Feldmethode zur Erfassung von Makroplastik H. Freund in den Nestern des Löffl ers auf Mellum .................................................................
    [Show full text]