DOCSLIB.ORG

Submission to the Senate Inquiry Into Operational Issues Arising in the Export Grain Storage, Transport, Handling and Shipping Network

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Submission to the Senate Inquiry into Operational issues arising in the export grain storage, transport, handling and shipping network 12 May 2011 GrainCorp Operations Limited Level 26, 175 Liverpool Street, Sydney NSW 2000 PO Box A268, Sydney South NSW 1235 T: 02 9325 9100 F: 02 9325 9180 www.graincorp.com.au ABN 52 003 875 401 Table of Contents Terms of Reference ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Structure of this submission ................................................................................................................................ 3 Executive summary ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Responses to matters raised ............................................................................................................................... 5 Matter A .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 Provision of access to the GrainCorp storage and handling network ......................................................... 5 Port elevators as ‘essential infrastructure’ ................................................................................................. 6 Provision of access to the GrainCorp port elevator network ...................................................................... 7 Matter B............................................................................................................................................................... 7 Eastern Australia grain market .................................................................................................................... 7 Grains market structure .............................................................................................................................. 7 Significant public information is available ................................................................................................... 8 Efficient market operation .......................................................................................................................... 8 Is grain stock information ‘proprietary’? ..................................................................................................... 9 Vertical integration in the Australian grain supply chain ............................................................................ 9 Matter C ............................................................................................................................................................. 10 Rail transport ............................................................................................................................................. 10 Matter D ............................................................................................................................................................ 11 Definition of ‘redelivery’ of grain .............................................................................................................. 11 Competition issues related to ‘redelivery’ ................................................................................................ 11 Matter E ............................................................................................................................................................. 11 Grain receival standards ............................................................................................................................ 11 Provision of grain storage and handling services ...................................................................................... 12 The need for flexibility in assessing grain .................................................................................................. 12 Experience from the 2010/11 harvest ....................................................................................................... 13 Training of grain assessment staff ............................................................................................................. 14 Certification of testing equipment ............................................................................................................ 15 Grain testing and assessment during harvest ........................................................................................... 15 Export grain quality ................................................................................................................................... 16 Matter F ............................................................................................................................................................. 16 Regulation of port access .......................................................................................................................... 16 Booking of elevation capacity at GrainCorp ports ..................................................................................... 17 Exports this year ........................................................................................................................................ 17 Removal of Government support for transportation of grain by rail ........................................................ 17 2 Submission to the Senate Inquiry into Operational issues arising in the export grain storage, transport, handling and shipping network Terms of Reference Operational issues arising in the export grain storage, transport, handling and shipping network, with particular reference to: a) any risks of natural, virtual or other monopolies discouraging or impeding competition in the export grain storage, transport, handling and shipping net‐work, and any implications for open and fair access to essential grains infrastructure; b) the degree of transparency in storage and handling of grain and the appropriateness of any consequent marketing advantages; c) equitable access to the lowest cost route to market, including transport options; d) competition issues arising from the redelivery of grain; e) the absence of uniform receipt, testing and classification standards and practices and any implications for growers and/or for Australia’s reputation as a quality supplier; f) equitable and efficient access to the shipping stem; and g) any other related matters. Structure of this submission GrainCorp will address the terms of reference in the order in which they appear above. As a number of the matters addressed in the Terms relate directly to matters that have been or are currently under examination by the ACCC, relevant submissions are appended to this submission. 3 Executive summary Matter A No evidence has been presented to support a view that GrainCorp has not provided fair and open access on commercial terms to parties seeking access to GrainCorp’s grain storage, handling, or port elevator infrastructure. Several enquires have confirmed that GrainCorp does not have monopoly advantage at its country network, including the recent Productivity Commission review. Matter B For a deregulated market to operate effectively there has to be a balance between the information held by one sector of the industry and another, in a manner that doesn’t confer upon one sector unreasonable market power. Calls for the release of previously unpublished information on grain receivals, and grower warehouse stocks by site and by grade, represent an attempt by grain traders to reverse the shift in market power back to growers that has occurred since the removal of the ‘single desk’. Matter C Rail and road transportation of grain from storage (ex a bulk‐handling network or ex‐farm) is available to all grain traders and buyers on a commercial basis. Access to transport capacity is primarily determined by the willingness of a participant to commit to contracts with transport providers on a commercial basis, or to manage the risk associated with purchasing transport (rail or road) on an ad hoc, ‘spot’ basis. Matter D GrainCorp actively seeks the delivery of grain from third party storages or ex‐farm storages into the company’s bulk‐handling network. Matter E Uniform grain standards are applied in the form of grade standards agreed by industry through the Grain Trade Australia (GTA), Australian Oilseeds Federation (AOF) and Pulse Australia (PA) Standards Committees. The wide variation in grain quality means that grade standards are set and applied in a manner that will ensure that grain can be received, stored and out‐turned to meet the requirements of grain consumers. Since the removal of the bulk wheat export monopoly, there have claims about a ‘decline’ in the quality of wheat exports has been made. No data has been provided to substantiate these claims. Matter F No evidence has been presented to substantiate any claim that GrainCorp has denied access to any party seeking commercial access to its port elevator network. The system of booking and allocating elevation capacity at GrainCorp ports is fair, transparent and minimises the price inflation effect of booking speculation that would be a component of any booking system that permitted transfer and trading of elevation capacity. 4 Responses to matters raised Matter A (a) any risks of natural, virtual or other monopolies discouraging or impeding competition in the export grain storage, transport, handling
Recommended publications
  • Submitted by DR.K.UMA MAHESWARI DIRECTOR CAFT - HOME SCIENCE

    Submitted by DR.K.UMA MAHESWARI DIRECTOR CAFT - HOME SCIENCE

    TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT OF CENTRE FOR ADVANCED FACULTY TRAINING IN HOME SCIENCE (APRIL 2018 – MARCH 2019) Submitted by DR.K.UMA MAHESWARI DIRECTOR CAFT - HOME SCIENCE POST GRADUATE & RESEARCH CENTRE FACULTY OF HOME SCIENCE PROFESSOR JAYASHANKAR TELANGANA STATE AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY RAJENDRANAGAR: HYDERABAD – 500 030 1 TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT OF CENTRE FOR ADVANCED FACULTY TRAINING FOR THE YEAR 2018-2019 1. Project Title : Centre of Advanced Faculty Training. 2. Sanction No. : Proc. No. 37735/H.Sc/A1/94, Date: 22-9-95 of APAU 3. Report Period : April 2018 – March 2019. Report No. : XXIV 4. Date of Start : 02-11-1995 5. A) Name of Institute/Station : Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural . University Rajendranagar, Hyderabad B) Division/Department/ : Centre for Advanced Faculty Training Section Post Graduate & Research Centre, Faculty of Home Science, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad – 500 030 6. Technical Programme a) Technical Programme as approved for the scheme: Appendix – I (Enclosed) b) Technical Programme for the next plan period: Submitted for Approval in the year 2019-20 (Appendix II enclosed) 7. Technical Personnel employed Contractual Personal Date of engaged Date of leaving 1. Computer Operator / J.A.C.T 01.04.2018 31.03.2019 @ Rs. 10733/- Consolidated pay 2 8. Total outlay : Rs. 1,87,61,845.70 S Year Budget sanctioned No (Rs) 1 1995-96 4, 56,219-20 2 1996-97 9, 61,192-20 3 1997-98 12, 01,649-20 4 1998-1999 9, 10,103-40 5 1999-2000 4, 86,691-75 6 2000-2001 7, 03,771-30 7 2001-2002 5, 28,023-90 8 2002-2003 5, 14,463-75 9 2003-2004 6, 32,489-00 10 2004-2005 4, 75,996-00 11 2005-2006 6, 45,016-00 12 2006-2007 6, 79,644-00 13 2007-2008 5, 06,987-00 14 2008-2009 7, 77,737-00 15 2009-2010 4, 33,989-00 16 2010-2011 5, 26,084-00 17 2011-2012 10, 27,806-00 18 2012-2013 9, 44,662-00 19 2013-2014 9, 57,426-00 20 2014-2015 13, 59,824-00 21 2015-2016 8, 49,234-00 22 2016-2017 7, 94, 384-00 23 2017-2018 8,96,953-00 24 2018-2019 11,06,500-00 Additional funds 2018-2019 3,85,000-00 Total Rs.
  • Review of the Moratorium on Genetically Modified Canola in Victoria Published by the Victorian Government Department of Primary Industries, Melbourne, November 2007

    Review of the Moratorium on Genetically Modified Canola in Victoria Published by the Victorian Government Department of Primary Industries, Melbourne, November 2007

    DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES Review of the moratorium on genetically modified canola in Victoria Published by the Victorian Government Department of Primary Industries, Melbourne, November 2007 © The State of Victoria, 2007 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cwth). Authorised by: Victorian Government 1 Spring Street, Melbourne Victoria 3000 Australia ISBN 978-1-74199-675-3 (print) ISBN 978-7-74199-676-0 (online) Disclaimer: This publication is copyright. Reproduction and the making available of this material for personal, in-house or non-commercial purposes is authorised, on condition that: • the copyright owner is acknowledged • no official connection is claimed • the material is made available without charge or at cost • the material is not subject to inaccurate, misleading or derogatory treatment. Requests for permission to reproduce or communicate this material in any way not permitted by this licence (or by the fair dealing provisions of the Copyright Act 1968) should be directed to the Customer Service Centre, 136 186 or email [email protected]. For more information about DPI visit the website at www.dpi.vic.gov.au or call the Customer Service Centre on 136 186. 30 October 2007 Minister for Agriculture Victoria Dear Minister As members of the independent Review of the moratorium on genetically modified canola in Victoria, we are pleased to submit our report to you. We would like to thank all those who took part in the Review by either providing submissions or other information to us or taking part in consultations.
  • Grower Representation and Its Impact on the Governance Structure of the Australian Grains Industry Terence C Farrell Α

    Grower Representation and Its Impact on the Governance Structure of the Australian Grains Industry Terence C Farrell Α

    Grower Representation and its Impact on the Governance Structure of the Australian Grains Industry Terence C Farrell α Abstract The Australian wheat industry has changed considerably in structure and governance during the past 15 years. The most important changes have been the deregulation of the domestic market and privatisation of the former Australian Wheat Board into AWB Limited. Through these changes growers have become shareholders in the various companies. Governance of the monopsonistic relationship between AWB Limited and AWB International by the Federal Minister of Agriculture and the Grains Council of Australia through the Wheat Export Authority has proved ineffective. Hence a national organisation that represents shareholders is recommended to increase grower governance of the supply chain and marketing of wheat. Key Words: Grain, Marketing, Infrastructure, Competition and Governance. The presentation of this paper was sponsored by Grain Growers Association. The views presented in this paper are strictly those of the author and may not coincide with the views or opinions of Grain Growers Association or its members. Contributed paper presented to the 48th Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Conference, Melbourne, February 11-13, 2004. I would like to thank Alistair Watson for useful information and comments. α Terence Farrell, 11 Cynthia Crescent, Armidale, NSW 2350. Phone 02 6771 2093. Email: [email protected] Table of Contents Page Introduction…………………………………………………………………………1 Background………………………………………………………………………….2 Path to Deregulation………………………………………………………………...2 Railway Companies.…..…………………………………………………………….5 Ports…………………………………………………………………………………7 Industry Governance………………………………………………………………...8 The Role of the Federal Minister for Agriculture…………………………………..11 Growers Representation…………………………………………………………….12 The New Structure………………………………………………………………….13 Bibliography………………………………………………………………………..15 Tables Page Table 1. Selected Changes in the Bulk Handling Industry 1989-2003.……………4 Table 2.
  • Annual Report 1998-1999.Pdf (PDF, 3.37MB)

    Annual Report 1998-1999.Pdf (PDF, 3.37MB)

    VISION AND MISSION IFC CENTRE OBJECTIVES 3 CHAIRMAN’S REPORT 4 MANAGING DIRECTOR’S REPORT 6 STRUCTURE AND MANAGEMENT 10 COOPERATIVE LINKAGES 14 RESEARCH PROGRAM 1 16 PROGRAM 2 29 PROGRAM 3A 37 PROGRAM 3B 41 PROGRAM 4 45 PROGRAM 5 51 EDUCATION AND TRAINING 61 UTILISATION, COMMERCIALISATION AND LINKS 69 STAFFING AND ADMINISTRATION 71 PATENTS, PUBLICATIONS, GRANTS AND AWARDS 72 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 76 1 MAJORMAJOR ACHIEVEMENTSACHIEVEMENTS ANDAND OUTCOMESOUTCOMES PROGRAM 1 PROGRAM 2 I A new method for detecting molecular I Commercial launch of the WheatRite test markers to accelerate wheat breeding. for rain damage. I New wheat germplasm with major I Improved quality at harvest and receival: benefits for processors and consumers. agronomy and storage procedures developed for growers and users. PROGRAM 3 PROGRAM 4 I Aids for the management of microbe I Methods for the rapid assessment of the contamination in wheat and flour mills. shelf-life of frozen dough products. I Enhanced process control in bakeries I Product quality improvements; knowledge leading to cost savings and superior of the effects of different starches and products. other ingredients on bread, pasta and noodles. PROGRAM 5 EDUCATION & TRAINING I New equipment and methods to evaluate I Multiple advisory aids provided to growers. wheat and flour properties. Great Grain quality assurance scheme I Quality tests to accelerate wheat piloted. breeding. I Tertiary educated scientists and technologists enter the industry, 2 Develop new wheats and new products. Develop improved diagnostic
  • Ublic Policy Cover-8

    Ublic Policy Cover-8

    50993 Public Policy Text 25/7/07 1:47 PM Page 44 PUBLIC POLICY VOLUME 2 NUMBER 1 2007 44 – 57 Deregulating Australia's Wheat Trade: from the Australian Wheat Board to AWB Limited Geoff Cockfield University of Southern Queensland Linda Courtenay Botterill The Australian National University In 2006 in Australia there was an inquiry into allegations of kickbacks being paid to the former Iraqi regime by the grain trading company AWB Limited. The inquiry and its aftermath provided an opportunity for proponents of unregulated trade in wheat to press for the removal of the AWB’s control of export sales. This article is a review of the history of the development and dismantling of wheat marketing regulation in Australia, treated as a case study to illustrate two things: the shift in the prevailing values in Australian agricultural policy over the last 35 years; and the way in which legislative cycles, reviews, institutional change and particular events provide opportunities for policy advocates to press for change, in this case over at least 40 years. It is argued here that the dominant paradigm for trading agricultural commodities shifted from one based on agrarian collectivism and sectoral stabilisation to a less regulated system with the focus on the values of efficiency and competitiveness. In November 2005 the Australian Government established an inquiry with the powers of a Royal Commission headed by Terence Cole to investigate allegations that the corporation AWB Limited1 (formerly the statutory authority Australian Wheat Board) had made payments to Saddam Hussein’s regime in Iraq through a Jordanian-based transport company in order to secure wheat sales, accusations originally raised by the UN Oil-for-Food inquiry headed by Paul Volker.
  • Australian Wheat Varieties: Grain Quality Data on Recently Registered Varieties

    Australian Wheat Varieties: Grain Quality Data on Recently Registered Varieties

    VALUE ADDED WHEAT CRC PROJECT REPORT Australian Wheat Varieties: Grain Quality Data on Recently Registered Varieties Compiled by: G.B. Cornish1,2 I.L. Batey1,3 and C.W. Wrigley1,3 1 Value Added Wheat CRC Ltd, North Ryde, NSW 2 SARDI Grain Quality Research Laboratory, Adelaide, S.A. 3 Food Science Australia, North Ryde, NSW Date: October 2002 VAWCRC Report No: 8 Copy No: 79 CONFIDENTIAL (Not to be copied) Value Added Wheat CRC has taken all reasonable care in preparing this publication. Value Added Wheat CRC expressly disclaims all and any liability to any person for any damage, loss or injury (including economic loss) arising from their use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. Australian Wheat Varieties: Grain Quality Data on Recently Registered Varieties G.B.Cornish1, 2 I.L.Batey1, 3, and C.W.Wrigley1, 3 1Value-Added Wheat CRC, North Ryde, NSW 2SARDI Grain Quality Research Laboratory, Adelaide, South Australia, and 3Food Science Australia, North Ryde, NSW This report provides quality data on wheat varieties that have recently been registered, thereby supplementing an earlier report, entitled ‘Current Australian Wheat Varieties: Grain Quality Data’, by Wrigley et al. (2001), published as Report No 48 of the Quality Wheat CRC. Also provided in this report is an up-dated table of attributes and genes relevant to grain quality (Table 1), plus a list of the grades to which specific varieties are acceptable in the 2002/3 harvest (Table 2.). Refer to the earlier report for an explanation of the genes described in this up-dated version.
  • Optimization Effect of Germination on Functional Properties of Wheat Flour by Response Surface Methodology

    Optimization Effect of Germination on Functional Properties of Wheat Flour by Response Surface Methodology

    International Research Journal of Plant Science (ISSN: 2141-5447) Vol. 3(3) pp. 031-037, March, 2012 Available online http://www.interesjournals.org/IRJPS Copyright © 2012 International Research Journals Full length Research Paper Optimization effect of germination on functional properties of wheat flour by response surface methodology 1, *Imtiaz Hussain and 2M. Burhan Uddin 1 Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture Rawalakot, University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan 2 Department of Food Technology and Rural Industries, Bangladesh Agricultural University Mymensing 2202, Bangladesh Accepted 29 March, 2012 The present study focused on optimization of functional properties of wheat flour prepared from germinated wheat seed. For optimization of germination conditions (time and temperature) study was designed by using the Response Surface Methodology (RSM), with a central composite rotatable design (CCRD). The wheat seeds were germinated at 30-37 ºC for 48-72 hours. Germinated wheat seed flour was evaluated for functional properties. The results shows that bulk densities (packed and lose) of germinated wheat flours were lower. Germination process increased water absorption capacity of wheat flour at ambient conditions but decreased in oil absorption capacity .The increase in foaming capacities and reduction in foam stability of all samples was recorded. Thus, the study indicated that germination improved the functional properties wheat flour. Germinated wheat flour can be successfully used for preparation weaning foods for proteins deficient children. Keywords: Germination, wheat, RSM, optimization, functional properties. INTRODUTION The wheat ( Triticum spp.) is cultivated worldwide. a unique elastic protein complex known as gluten Globally, wheat is the most-produced food among the complex, forming avisco-elastic dough that is preferred cereal crops after rice.
  • Cerealsgrains2019 PB V2.Pdf

    Cerealsgrains2019 PB V2.Pdf

    PROGRAM BOOK &GRAINS CEREALS November 3–5, 2019 | Denver, Colorado, U.S.A. #cerealsgrains19 TABLE OF CONTENTS THANK YOU! GENERAL MEETING INFORMATION Program Team Leaders Social Media ........................................................................................................ 2 Program Team Chair: Sean M. Finnie, Bay State Milling, Quincy, MA, WiFi ......................................................................................................................... 2 U.S.A. Registration Hours ............................................................................................ 2 Program Team Vice Chair: Andreia Bianchini, University of Speaker Kiosk ...................................................................................................... 2 Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, U.S.A. Photography ....................................................................................................... 2 Program Board Liaison: Anne M. Birkett, Kellogg Co., Battle Creek, MI, Committee Meetings ...................................................................................... 2 U.S.A. PROGRAM SCHEDULES 2019 Team Sunday Shima Agah, Allied Blending LP, Los Angeles, CA, U.S.A. Sunday Schedule at a Glance ....................................................................... 5 Vanessa M. Brovelli, Bay State Milling, Quincy, MA, U.S.A. Sunday Scientific Sessions ............................................................................ 6 Lomme J. Deleu, KU Leuven, Heverlee, BELGIUM Girish M. Ganjyal, Washington State
  • Choice of Foods and Ingredients for Moderately Malnourished Children 6 Months to 5 Years of Age

    Choice of Foods and Ingredients for Moderately Malnourished Children 6 Months to 5 Years of Age

    Choice of foods and ingredients for moderately malnourished children 6 months to 5 years of age Kim F. Michaelsen, Camilla Hoppe, Nanna Roos, Pernille Kaestel, Maria Stougaard, Lotte Lauritzen, Christian Mølgaard, Tsinuel Girma, and Henrik Friis Abstract quality, especially PUFA content and ratios, in children with moderate malnutrition. There is consensus on how to treat severe malnutrition, but there is no agreement on the most cost-effective way to treat infants and young children with moderate mal- Introduction nutrition who consume cereal-dominated diets. The aim of this review is to give an overview of the nutritional Child malnutrition is a major global health problem, qualities of relevant foods and ingredients in relation leading to morbidity and mortality, impaired intellec- to the nutritional needs of children with moderate mal- tual development and working capacity, and increased nutrition and to identify research needs. The following risk of adult disease. This review will deal with the general aspects are covered: energy density, macronutri- needs of children between the ages of 6 months and ent content and quality, minerals and vitamins, bioactive 5 years with moderate malnutrition. Infants below 6 substances, antinutritional factors, and food processing. months of age should (ideally) be exclusively breastfed, The nutritional values of the main food groups—cereals, and if malnourished, will have special needs, which will legumes, pulses, roots, vegetables, fruits, and animal not be covered here. Moderate malnutrition includes all foods—are discussed. The special beneficial qualities children with moderate wasting, defined as a weight- of animal-source foods, which contain high levels of for-height between –3 and –2 z-scores of the median minerals important for growth, high-quality protein, of the new World Health Organization (WHO) child and no antinutrients or fibers, are emphasized.
  • The Influence of Extracts of Ascophvllum Nodosum on Plant and Soil-Borne Pathogen Interactions

    The Influence of Extracts of Ascophvllum Nodosum on Plant and Soil-Borne Pathogen Interactions

    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk 04 University of Plymouth Research Theses 01 Research Theses Main Collection 2002 The influence of extracts of Ascophvllum nodosum on plant and soil-borne pathogen interactions CUNHA, FELISBERTA MARIA JESUS http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/2348 University of Plymouth All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. The influence of extracts of Ascophvllum nodosum on plant and soil-borne pathogen interactions by FELISBERTA M ARIA JESUS CUNHA A thesis submitted to the University of Plymouth In partial fulfilment of the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Faculty of Agriculture, Food & Land Use 2002 11 .~.::~.} (.. ··~·. ..... .. : ~; ....· ;· •j.. ' ~UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH~ I I llom No. 9 .0 0 'S ~ ~ 1: 6 s- )( .! ' 1 f1~tq ;.2 ' I APR 200'i vll~ t~o.f-18r:s1S b..z&.:, , c~ cor·,u~ '!e ·L . .. .. _ l?lVMOUr:H U~!W ' -~- . I ABSTRACT Felisberta Maria Jesus Cunha The influence of extracts of Ascoplryllum nodosum on plant and soil-borne pathogen interactions This thesis presents an investigation into the responses to extracts of Ascophyllum nodosum (Maxicrop seaweed extracts - MSE) of two different plants species - wheat and strawberry, and their interactions with two soil-borne pathogens, Gaeumannomyces graminis and Phytophthora .fragariae respectively, under various environmental conditions.
  • Structure, Hormonal Regulation and Chromosomal Location of Genes Encoding Barley (1-+A)-B-Xylan Endohydrolases

    Structure, Hormonal Regulation and Chromosomal Location of Genes Encoding Barley (1-+A)-B-Xylan Endohydrolases

    l;),, (!. s,9 47 STRUCTURE, HORMONAL RB,GULA CHROMOSOMAL LOCATION OF GENES ENCODING BARLEY (1+4)- p-XYLAI\ ENDOHYDROLASES by MITALI BANIK, B.Sc. (Hons.), M.Sc. A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Plant Science, Division of Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences, TheUniversity of Adelaide, Waite Campus, Glen Osmond,5064 Australia October, 1996 1l STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP Except where reference is made in the text of the thesis, this thesis contains no material published elsewhere or extracted in whole or in part from a thesis presented by me for another degree or diploma. No other person's work has been used without due acknowledgment in the main text of the thesis. This thesis has not been submitted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any other tertiary institution. MITALI BANIK October, 1996 o lll ACKNOWLBDGMENTS I would like to express my deepest sense of gratitude and indebtedness to my supervisor, Professor Geoffrey B. Fincher, Head of Department, Plant Science, University of Adelaide for his constant guidance, infinite patience, encouragement and invaluable suggestions throughout my studies. I wish to express my immense gratitude to Professor Derek Bewley, Department of Botany, University of Guelph, Canada for his constructive criticism during the preparation of this thesis. I am also grateful to Drs. Frank Gubler and John V. Jacobsen, CSIRO Division of Plant Industry, Canberra for providing a cDNA library. I wish to thank Dr. Simon Robinson, Senior Scientist, CSIRO for his constructive suggestions throughout the duration of my research project.
  • Victorian Winter Crop Summary 23 Barley

    Victorian Winter Crop Summary 23 Barley

    BARLEY For detailed information on agronomy and pests and later than SloopSA with best adaptation on 325mm- diseases refer to the ‘Crop Management Notes’ CD. 450mm annual rainfall. Tested as VB0105, registered 2005 and marketed by VARIETY DESCRIPTIONS AWB Seeds. A denotes Plant Breeder Rights apply. Potential malting barley – COWABBIE A Malting barley - ARAPILES Cowabbie is a midseason maturing, variety developed Mid season maturity, more prone to high screenings by NSW Agriculture, it was released as a feed variety, under drought stress than Schooner or Sloop. May however it is undergoing commercial evaluation for produce high grain screenings if excess nitrogen is malting quality. Cowabbie has a larger grain size than applied. Susceptible to CCN, powdery mildew and leaf Gairdner. This variety has a short straw length with scald. Has adult plant resistance to the net form of net good strength. Cowabbie is susceptible to the net form blotch and has moderate resistance to the spot form of of net blotch, and very susceptible to the spot form of net blotch. Arapiles has relatively weak straw, and is net blotch, moderately resistant to powdery mildew prone to head loss under unfavourable conditions. and leaf scald. This variety has limited segregation in Yields of Arapiles are significantly lower than Gairdner. Victoria. Arapiles gained favour as the grain source for Shochu Multigrade contracts for purchase of Cowabber barley up to in Japan, but unfavourable recent seasons and lower malt 1 grade are to be offered (for a limited volume) by quality grain, lost this market (at least temporarily). Graincorp in 2006 for production in Southern NSW and A variety with outclassed agronomic performance and Victoria.