Wesley Mission - Green Conscience Wesley Mission - Green Conscience
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
National Heritage Nomination
NOMINATION FORM The National Heritage List is a record of places in the Australian jurisdiction that have outstanding natural, Indigenous or historic heritage values for the nation. These places they are protected by federal law under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. Nominating a place for the National Heritage List means identifying its national heritage values on this form and providing supporting evidence. If you need help in filling out this form, contact 1800 020 625. Form checklist 1. read the Nomination Notes for advice and tips on answering questions in this form. 2. add attachments and extra papers where indicated (Note: this material will not be returned). 3. provide your details, sign and date the form. Q1. What is the name of the place? The Coal River Precinct, Newcastle (NSW State Heritage Register No.1674) http://www.heritage.nsw.gov.au/07_subnav_02_2.cfm?itemid=5053900 and The Convict Lumber Yard (NSW State Heritage Register No.570). http://www.heritage.nsw.gov.au/07_subnav_02_2.cfm?itemid=5044978 For the purpose of this nomination ‘the place’ including both sites is called the ‘Coal River Heritage Park’. Give the street address, or, if remote, describe where it is in relation to the nearest town. Include its area and boundaries. Attach a map with the location and boundaries of the place clearly marked. See the Nomination Notes for map requirements. Q2a. Where is the place? The Coal River Heritage Park is situated at the southern entrance to the Port of Newcastle, New South Wales. It includes landmarks such as Nobbys, Macquarie Pier, the southern headland (Colliers Point/Signal Hill and Flagstaff Hill) including Fort Scratchley, the convict lumber yard and adjoining foreshore. -
Kooragang Wetlands: Retrospective of an Integrated Ecological Restoration Project in the Hunter River Estuary
KOORAGANG WETLANDS: RETROSPECTIVE OF AN INTEGRATED ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION PROJECT IN THE HUNTER RIVER ESTUARY P Svoboda Hunter Local Land Services, Paterson NSW Introduction: At first glance, the Hunter River estuary near Newcastle NSW is a land of contradictions. It is home to one of the world’s largest coal ports and a large industrial complex as well as being the location of a large internationally significant wetland. The remarkable natural productivity of the Hunter estuary at the time of European settlement is well documented. Also well documented are the degradation and loss of fisheries and other wildlife habitat in the estuary due to over 200 years of draining, filling, dredging and clearing (Williams et al., 2000). However, in spite of extensive modification, natural systems of the estuary retained enough value and function for large areas to be transformed by restoration activities that aimed to show industry and environmental conservation could work together to their mutual benefit. By establishing partnerships and taking a collaborative and adaptive approach, the project was able to implement restoration and related activities on a landscape basis, working across land ownership and management boundaries (Kooragang Wetland Rehabilitation Project, 2010). The Kooragang Wetland Rehabilitation Project (KWRP) was launched in 1993 to help compensate for the loss of fisheries and other wildlife habitat at suitable sites in the Hunter estuary. This paper revisits the expectations and planning for the project as presented in a paper to the INTECOL’s V international wetlands conference in 1996 (Svoboda and Copeland, 1998), reviews the project’s activities, describes outcomes and summarises issues faced and lessons learnt during 24 years of implementing a large, long-term, integrated, adaptive and community-assisted ecological restoration project. -
Non-Aboriginal Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA)
Appendix F – Non-Aboriginal Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) GHD | Report for Hunter Water Corporation - Belmont Temporary Desalination Plant, 2219573 Our ref: PR139685-1: v1.4 PO Box 1048, Robina, QLD, 4230 Lakeside Corporate Space, Suite 425 Level 2, 34-38 Glenferrie Drive Robina, QLD, 4226 T +61 7 5553 6900 Date: 11 October 2019 GHD Michelle Kiejda Technical Director - Environment GHD Tower Level 3, 24 Honeysuckle Drive Newcastle NSW 2300 Dear Michelle, RE: Belmont Drought Response Desalination Plant, Non-Aboriginal Heritage Impact Assessment Report (HIA). RPS has been engaged by GHD on behalf of Hunter Water (the Proponent) to prepare a non-Aboriginal heritage impact assessment report (HIA). The HIA has been prepared in accordance with the Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements (SEARs) to support the submission of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIS), for a drought response desalination plant (also referred to as a temporary desalination plant) at Belmont, in the Lake Macquarie City Council Local Government Area (LGA), NSW. SEARs were issued for application SSD 8896 on 12 December 2017 and on 24 January 2018 (revised). The purpose of a HIA is to investigate and assess the impact of works on non-Aboriginal heritage and to provide recommendations to avoid or mitigate impact. 1.1 The Project The Project (Concept Design – Figure 1) is for the construction and operation of a drought response desalination plant, designed to produce up to 15 ML/day of potable water, with key components including: Seawater intake – The central intake structures would be a concrete structure (referred to as a caisson) of approximately nine to 11 metres diameter, installed to a depth up to 20 m below existing surface levels. -
Study-Newcastle-Lonely-Planet.Pdf
Produced by Lonely Planet for Study NT NewcastleDO VIBRAne of Lonely Planet’s Top 10 Cities in Best in Travel 2011 N CREATIVE A LANET Y P ’S EL TO N P O 1 L 0 F TOP C O I T TOP E I E N S O 10 CITY I N 10 CITY ! 1 B 1 E 0 S 2 2011 T L I E N V T A R 2011 PLANE LY T’S NE T O O P L F 1 O 0 C E I N T I O E S ! 1 I 1 N 0 B 2 E L S E T V I A N R T LANET Y P ’S EL TO N P O 1 TOP L 0 F TOP C O I T 10 CITY E I E N S O 10 CITY I N ! 2011 1 B 1 E 0 LAN S P E 2 Y T 2011 T L L ’ I S E N E V T A R N T O O P L F 1 O 0 C E I N T I O E S ! 1 I 1 N 0 B 2 E L S E T V I A N R T E W RE HANI AKBAR st VER I » Age 22 from Saudi Arabia OL » From Saudi Arabia » Studying an International Foundation program What do you think of Newcastle? It’s so beautiful, not big not small, nice. It’s a good place for students who are studying, with a lot of nice people. -
Newcastle Fortresses
NEWCASTLE FORTRESSES Thanks to Margaret (Marg) Gayler for this article. During World War 2, Newcastle and the surrounding coast between Nelson Bay and Swansea was fortified by Defence forces to protect the east coast of New South Wales against the enemy, in case of attack from the Japanese between 1940 and 1943. There were the established Forts along the coastline, including Fort Tomaree, Fort Wallace (Stockton), Fort Scratchley, Nobbys Head (Newcastle East) and Shepherd’s Hill (Bar Beach) and Fort Redhead. The likes of Fort Tomaree (Nelson Bay), Fort Redhead (Dudley) and combined defence force that operated from Mine Camp (Catherine Hill Bay) came online during the Second World War to also protect our coast and industries like BHP from any attempt to bomb the Industries as they along with other smaller industries in the area helped in the war effort by supplying steel, razor wire, pith hats to our armed forces fighting overseas and here in Australia. With Australia at war overseas the Government of the day during the war years decided it was an urgency to fortify our coast line with not only the Army but also with the help of Navy and Air- Force in several places along the coast. So there was established a line of communication up and down the coast using all three defence forces involved. Starting with Fort Tomaree and working the way down to Fort Redhead adding a brief description of Mine Camp and the role of the RAAF, also mentioning where the Anti Aircraft placements were around Newcastle at the time of WW2. -
Lake Macquarie City Destination Management Plan 2018 – 2022 3
CONTENTS .................................................................................................................................... I 1. WORDS FROM OUR MAYOR ............................................................................................ 3 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... 4 1. Destination Analysis .......................................................................................................... 5 2. Destination Direction ....................................................................................................... 10 3. DESTINATION ANALYSIS ................................................................................................ 16 1. Key destination footprint ................................................................................................. 16 2. Key assets....................................................................................................................... 17 3. Key infrastructure ............................................................................................................ 19 4. Key strengths and opportunities ..................................................................................... 21 5. Visitor market and key source markets ........................................................................... 23 6. Market positioning ........................................................................................................... 26 7. Opportunities -
A3-Port-Aerial-Map-Low-Res.Pdf
18 KOORAGANG PRECINCT 17 Kooragang 4, 5, 6, 7 Berths 18 Kooragang 8, 9, 10 Berths 19 18 17 MAYFIELD PRECINCT 11 9 Mayfield 4 Berth 11 Mayfield 7 Berth 13 10 10 BHP 6 16 WALSH POINT PRECINCT 18 9 15 15 Kooragang 2 Berth 16 Kooragang 3 Berth 11 8 7 CARRINGTON PRECINCT 1 West Basin 3 Berth 5 Channel Berth 2 West Basin 4 Berth 6 Dyke 1 Berth 3 East Basin 1 and 2 Berths 7 Dyke 2 Berth 6 4 Towage services 8 Dyke 4 and 5 Berths 18 KEY Port of Newcastle Boundary 2 as per the State Environmental 3 18 North / South Rail Corridor Planning Policy (Three Ports) 5 1 Mayfield Site Boundary 19 To M1 Motorway, Golden Highway and New England Highway Arterial road access 20 Port of Newcastle Head Office 4 Rail lines 4 20 BERTH INFORMATION CARRINGTON PRECINCT WALSH POINT PRECINCT Berth Details Facilities Cargo/Commodity Operators Berth Details Facilities Cargo/ Operators Commodity West Basin 3 Design depth: 11.6m 4 ship loaders Grains Common user Channel depth: 12.8m Loading height max: 17.1m Orange juice 1 Kooragang 2 Design depth: 11.6m 2 gantry type grab unloaders Bulk cargo Common user Loading outreach max: 26.5m concentrate Predominant user: Channel depth: 15.2m Bulk liquids Travel distance: 213.4m GrainCorp 15 1 ship loader General cargo New state-of-the-art crane Design throughput: 1,000tph Storage area adjacent to Containers and conveyor infrastructure berths due for completion in 2019. West Basin 4 Design depth: 11.6m Berth-face rail line Machinery Common user 2 Channel depth: 12.8m 1.5ha wharf storage area Project cargo Dolphins at either end allow -
Getting Things Done
Incitec Pivot Limited Pivot Incitec ® Getting ® Annual Report 2006 Report Annual things done. ® ® ® ® Incitec Pivot Limited ABN 42 004 080 264 70 Southbank Boulevard, ™ Southbank Victoria 3006, Australia Postal address Incitec Pivot Limited GPO Box 1322 Melbourne Victoria 3001, Australia T. + 61 3 8695 4400 F. + 61 3 8695 4419 www.incitecpivot.com.au Annual Report 2006 ® Incitec Pivot Limited ABN 42 004 080 264 Shareholder Information Annual General Meeting 2.00 pm Wednesday 20 December 2006 at The Arts Centre, 100 St Kilda Road, Melbourne Victoria 3000, Australia, in the ANZ Pavilion Stock Exchange Listing Incitec Pivot’s shares are listed on the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) and are traded under the code IPL Share Registry Link Market Services Level 12, 680 George Street, Sydney New South Wales 2000, Australia Locked Bag A14 Sydney South New South Wales 1235 Telephone: 1300 554 474 (for callers within Australia) International: +61 2 8280 7111 General Facsimile: +61 2 9287 0303 Proxy Facsimile: +61 2 9287 0309 Email: [email protected] Website: www.linkmarketservices.com.au Auditor KPMG 147 Collins Street, Melbourne Victoria 3000, Australia Incitec Pivot Limited Registered address and head office: 70 Southbank Boulevard, Southbank Victoria 3006, Australia GPO Box 1322 Melbourne Victoria 3001, Australia Telephone: +61 3 8695 4400 Facsimile: +61 3 8695 4419 www.incitecpivot.com.au SuPerfect, Easy Liquids, Green Urea and FertTerms Plus are registered trade marks of Incitec Pivot Limited. Cal Gran is a trade mark of Incitec Pivot Limited. The BIG N logo, Nutrient Advantage, Granulock, GranAm and Liquifert are registered trade marks of Incitec Fertilizers Limited. -
AHMS Previous Excavations at ACCOR Ibis Hotel and Riverwalk in Relation to the Study Area
SECTION 87/90 ABORIGINAL HERITAGE IMPACT PERMIT #1098622 EXCAVATION REPORT FOR SBA ARCHITECTS PTY LTD A piece of Nobby’s Tuff manuport recovered from a sand dune deposit dated between 3,500 and 2,480 years BP. Final Report 13 May 2011 684 Hunter Street, Newcastle - Section 87/90 #1098622 AHIP Excavation Report “This page has been intentionally left blank” Archaeological & Heritage Management Solutions Pty Ltd May 2011 2 684 Hunter Street, Newcastle - Section 87/90 #1098622 AHIP Excavation Report CONTENTS 1. Introduction ............................................................................................ 15 1.1 Rational, Scope and Objectives .............................................................. 15 1.2 Study Area....................................................................................... 16 1.3 Report Structure ................................................................................ 16 1.4 Authorship........................................................................................ 14 1.5 Acknowledgements ............................................................................. 14 2. Project Description ................................................................................... 15 2.1 Background....................................................................................... 15 2.2 Proposed Development......................................................................... 18 3. Aboriginal stakeholder Consultation .............................................................. -
THE MAKING of the NEWCASTLE INDUSTRIAL HUB 1915 to 1950
THE MAKING OF THE NEWCASTLE INDUSTRIAL HUB 1915 to 1950 Robert Martin Kear M.Bus. (University of Southern Queensland) A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of a Master of Philosophy in History January 2018 This research was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY I hereby certify that the work embodied in the thesis is my own work, conducted under normal supervision. The thesis contains no material which has been accepted, or is being examined, for the award of any other degree or diploma in any other university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I give consent to the final version of my thesis being made available worldwide when deposited in the University’s Digital Repository, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968 and any approved embargo. Robert Kear ii ABSTRACT Aim of this Thesis The aim of this thesis is to chart the formation of the Newcastle Industrial Hub and to identify the men who controlled it, in its journey from Australian regional obscurity before 1915, to be the core of Australian steel manufacturing and technological development by 1950. This will be achieved through an examination of the progressive and consistent application of strategic direction and the adoption of manufacturing technologies that progressively lowered the manufacturing cost of steel. This thesis will also argue that, coupled with tariff and purchasing preferences assistance, received from all levels of government, the provision of integrated logistic support services from Newcastle’s public utilities and education services underpinned its successful commercial development. -
Airds High School Mentoring Program
AIRDS HIGH SCHOOL MENTORING PROGRAM ......................................................................... 21870 ALBURY ELECTORATE AWARD RECIPIENTS ............................................................................ 21866 ALBURY ELECTORATE QUEEN'S BIRTHDAY HONOURS RECIPIENT ................................... 21866 APPROPRIATION (PARLIAMENT) BILL 2013 ................................................................... 21811, 21885 APPROPRIATION BILL 2013 ................................................................................................ 21811, 21885 ARLENE BLENCOWE WORLD BOXING TITLE HOLDER .......................................................... 21865 AUTISM ADVISORY AND SUPPORT SERVICE CHARITY BALL .............................................. 21863 BANKSTOWN LEGACY.................................................................................................................... 21888 BARDEN RIDGE SPORTS COMPLEX ............................................................................................. 21878 BARRENJOEY HIGH SCHOOL BAND ............................................................................................ 21864 BERRY WALKWAY PROJECT ......................................................................................................... 21879 BINA JEWISH EDUCATIONAL ORGANISATION ......................................................................... 21863 BISHOP ANTOINE TARABAY ORDINATION ............................................................................... 21863 BOER -
Shifting Sands at Stockton Beach Report
NEWCASTLE CITY COUNCIL SHIFTING SANDS AT STOCKTON BEACH Prepared by: Umwelt (Australia) Pty Limited Environmental and Catchment Management Consultants in association with June 2002 1411/R04/V2 Report No. 1411/R04/V2 Prepared for: NEWCASTLE CITY COUNCIL SHIFTING SANDS AT STOCKTON BEACH Umwelt (Australia) Pty Limited Environmental and Catchment Management Consultants PO Box 838 Toronto NSW 2283 Ph. (02) 4950 5322 Fax (02) 4950 5737 Shifting Sands at Stockton Beach Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1.1 2.0 PREVIOUS STUDIES AND REPORTS ................................. 2.1 2.1 BETWEEN WIND AND WATER (COLTHEART 1997) ............................2.1 2.2 NEWCASTLE HARBOUR INVESTIGATION (PWD (1963) REPORT 104)..........................................................................................2.2 2.3 NEWCASTLE HARBOUR – HYDROGRAPHIC HISTORY (MANLEY 1963) ......................................................................................2.2 2.4 LITTORAL DRIFT IN THE VICINITY OF NEWCASTLE HARBOUR (BOLEYN AND CAMPBELL CIRCA 1966) .............................................2.4 2.5 NEWCASTLE HARBOUR SILTATION INVESTIGATION (PWD 1969)...2.5 2.6 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DEEPENING OF NEWCASTLE HARBOUR (MSB 1976) ...................................................2.6 2.7 FEASIBILITY STUDY ON NOURISHMENT OF STOCKTON BEACH (DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 1978) ..........................................2.7 2.8 NEWCASTLE COASTLINE HAZARD DEFINITION STUDY (WBM