106–928 District of Columbia Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2001

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

106–928 District of Columbia Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2001 S. HRG. 106–928 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001 HEARING BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON H.R. 4942 and 5633/S. 3041 AN ACT MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND OTHER ACTIVITIES CHARGEABLE IN WHOLE OR IN PART AGAINST THE REVENUES OF SAID DISTRICT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2001, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES Council of the District of Columbia Financial Responsibility and Management Assistance Authority Office of the Mayor Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 62–772 cc WASHINGTON : 2001 For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office, Washington, DC 20402 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS TED STEVENS, Alaska, Chairman THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico ERNEST F. HOLLINGS, South Carolina CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont SLADE GORTON, Washington FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky TOM HARKIN, Iowa CONRAD BURNS, Montana BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama HARRY REID, Nevada JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire HERB KOHL, Wisconsin ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah PATTY MURRAY, Washington BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota LARRY CRAIG, Idaho DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois JON KYL, Arizona STEVEN J. CORTESE, Staff Director LISA SUTHERLAND, Deputy Staff Director JAMES H. ENGLISH, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas, Chairman JON KYL, Arizona RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois TED STEVENS, Alaska, (ex officio) ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia (ex officio) Professional Staff MARY BETH NETHERCUTT TERRY SAUVAIN (Minority) Administrative Support LIZ BLEVINS (Minority) (II) CONTENTS TUESDAY, JUNE 13, 2000 Page Council of the District of Columbia ........................................................................ 1 Financial Responsibility and Management Assistance Authority ....................... 1 Office of the Mayor .................................................................................................. 1 Nondepartmental witness ....................................................................................... 87 (III) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001 TUESDAY, JUNE 13, 2000 U.S. SENATE, SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS, Washington, DC. The subcommittee met at 11:06 a.m., in room SD–192, Dirksen Senate Office Building, Hon. Kay Bailey Hutchison (chairman) pre- siding. Present: Senators Hutchison, Kyl, and Durbin. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICE OF THE MAYOR STATEMENT OF HON. ANTHONY A. WILLIAMS, MAYOR COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATEMENT OF LINDA W. CROPP, CHAIRMAN FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE AUTHORITY STATEMENT OF DR. ALICE RIVLIN, MEMBER OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON Senator HUTCHISON. I would like to make a short opening state- ment, and then we have two other Senators who are going to be late. We are going to start and proceed and then as they come, we will certainly welcome them to take part in the hearing. I want to welcome our witnesses today, Mayor Williams, Council Chairman Cropp, and Dr. Rivlin. Each of you is playing a critical role in the revitalization of the District of Columbia. PERCENT OF FEDERAL FUNDS Today’s hearing, of course, focuses on the District’s 2001 budget. The Federal Government is providing nearly $400 million in direct spending for the District and in combination with Federal grants, the U.S. funds 27 percent of the District’s budget. I think there is good news in the District budget. Clearly, the City is headed in the right direction financially. For fiscal year 2001, I am told you are planning to hold a surplus of approxi- mately $260 million above the 4 percent requirement of $189 mil- lion. (1) 2 RESERVE The District is also doing the right thing with the reserve fund, continuing to hold the $150 million in emergency reserve. There are, I think, some other financial safeguards that should benefit the City, and I hope that we can discuss those as we go through this process. EDUCATION SPENDING Education spending, under this budget, will improve dramati- cally for both the public school system and charter schools. Spend- ing will be on a per-pupil basis so that charter schools are not dis- criminated against. TAX CUT And the District is continuing with its tax cut that was passed last year, reducing property rates and income tax rates, hopefully making the District more competitive with neighboring jurisdic- tions. I think these are positive developments. DEBT POLICY Having said that, I do see some red flags for the future. I believe the District is moving in the wrong direction on debt policy. The City is refinancing its debt, albeit saving on short-term interest costs, but putting itself in debt for a longer term. The City already has $3 billion in debt. And it seems to be intent on expanding that debt, planning nearly $1.6 billion in new debt in the next 5 years. In 1999 Moody’s Investors Service, assessing the District of Co- lumbia, said, ‘‘ The District’s annual debt service burden is pro- jected to remain a heavy 11 to 12 percent of local revenues.’’ PER CAPITA DEBT Cities with low debt that receive high bond ratings have per cap- ita debt of approximately $743 per person. The District’s per capita debt ratio is almost $6,200 per person. As you can see, the Dis- trict’s debt ratio is far beyond what it ought to be. In looking at the Moody’s comments, they say that all of the ra- tios for the District of Columbia are high when you are looking at its debt from any standpoint. So I am going to raise the caution flag and say that I think the one thing that the District must do to get on a track to receive a better bond rating is to look at debt principles and a debt policy that is more restrictive rather than less. I know there are infrastructure needs, but this kind of increasing debt, I think, is the wrong direction. And as we all know, we are going into a higher interest rate market. RESERVE FUNDS During the budget debate, there was considerable discussion about the $150 million reserve fund. I do not believe the fund needs to be cumulative. I do believe, however, that the District 3 must hold a real reserve each year, and that it must only be spent for real emergencies. Further, I think dipping into the reserve should be the funding source of last resort, and all other surplus funds should be ex- hausted before tapping the emergency fund. I will propose that the reserve be placed in a separate interest- bearing account so that the public and the market watchers will know that the reserve is real and tangible, a rainy day account, and not a bookkeeping entry. Additionally, if there is a need for unanticipated expenses, which we did see this year, versus genuine emergencies, then I would be open to providing the City with greater flexibility. UNANTICIPATED NEEDS Unanticipated needs are those spending items that might arise after the budget process or something required by Federal legisla- tion, perhaps something due to severe weather or even a court order. Any new flexibility must be accompanied by more established cri- teria for what is emergency spending and what is simply unantici- pated. I believe we must have very certain parameters if we are going to have greater flexibility, which I think we need. So let me conclude by reiterating that I think the City’s overall financial picture is good. I believe that working together, we have been able to make some great progress. And I think we can craft a budget that will even go further to give you needed flexibility but solid financial parameters, so that you will continue to build to- ward a better bond rating and lower borrowing costs and, of course, a healthier city. I want to thank all of you for being here and for all you are doing and for the great working relationship that I feel that we have. Before we begin with your testimony, I just want to remind you that your entire statement will be made part of the record, so that if you can limit your opening statement to 5 minutes or so, we will put your entire statement on the record. And then I will also say that without objection, the record will remain open until 5 p.m. on Monday, June 19, 2000 for the submis- sion of any additional testimony or responses to questions that members may raise as they come. As I mentioned, Senator Durbin will be here later, and Senator Kyl, as well, will be here later. So with that, I would like to recognize Mayor Williams and wel- come you here. STATEMENT OF MAYOR ANTHONY A. WILLIAMS Mayor WILLIAMS. Thank you, Madam Chairman, and members of the Committee for having us here today to talk about the District of Columbia’s fiscal year 2001 budget. I have submitted my testimony for the record. As I go through it, I will try to give you the highlights to allow the maximum amount of time for my colleagues to submit their testimony and for questions and answers. 4 This budget builds upon the strong financial recovery we have achieved over recent years. We are going to begin the 2001 budget having met the three financial goals set by Congress. FOUR CONSECUTIVE BUDGETS First, we will have balanced four consecutive budgets, those for fiscal year 1997 through fiscal year 2000; second, we will have gained full access to credit markets; and third, we will have estab- lished financial reserves totaling over $400 million.
Recommended publications
  • Why Should We Worry About the National Debt: MITCH DANIELS Questions and Answers LEON PANETTA TIM PENNY April 16, 2019
    CHAIRMEN Why Should We Worry About the National Debt: MITCH DANIELS Questions and Answers LEON PANETTA TIM PENNY April 16, 2019 “Why Should We Worry About the National Debt?” describes six important ways PRESIDENT MAYA MACGUINEAS that the growing national debt will affect the budget and the economy. Below, we answer specific questions frequently raised about the topic. DIRECTORS Isn’t debt sustainable when the economy grows faster than interest rates? BARRY ANDERSON Despite the fact economic growth rate is higher than government interest rates (r<g), ERSKINE BOWLES CHARLES BOWSHER debt remains on an unsustainable trajectory in the United States. Economist Olivier KENT CONRAD Blanchard and others have pointed out that governments can shrink their debt-to- DAN CRIPPEN GDP ratio while still borrowing to finance their interest payments when r<g. VIC FAZIO However, this only leads to a sustainable outcome if a government is running a WILLIS GRADISON primary balance (revenue equals non-interest spending) or a sufficiently modest JANE HARMAN WILLIAM HOAGLAND primary deficit. The United States today is running a large and growing primary JIM JONES deficit. As a result, both debt and interest payments will continue to rise faster than LOU KERR the economy despite low interest rates. There is also no guarantee that the economic JIM KOLBE growth rate will remain higher than interest rates, particularly as rising debt puts CYNTHIA LUMMIS MARJORIE MARGOLIES downward pressure on growth and upward pressure on rates. DAVE MCCURDY JAMES MCINTYRE, JR. Do low interest rates mean deficits don’t “crowd out” investment? DAVID MINGE Evidence suggests that today’s low interest rates are in spite of, not because of, high JUNE O’NEILL deficits and debt – and that deficits continue to “crowd out” investment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Defense Program and the Economy Hearings
    THE DEFENSE PROGRAM AND THE ECONOMY HEARINGS BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC GOALS AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL POLICY OF THE JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES NINETY-SEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST AND SECOND SESSIONS PART 1 OCTOBER 7, 13, 22, AND 29, 1981, AND DECEMBER 15, 1982 Printed for the use of the Joint Economic Committee U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 9-760 WASHINGTON:.1983 JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE (Created pursuant to see. 5(a) of Public law 304, 79th Cong.) HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SENATE HENRY S. REUSS, Wisconsin, Chairman ROGER W. JEPSEN, Iowa, Vice Chairman RICHARD BOLLING, Missouri WILLIAM V. ROTH, Ja., Delaware LEE H. HAMILTON, Indiana JAMES ABDNOR, South Dakota. GILLIS W. LONG, Louisiana STEVEN D. SYMMS, Idaho PARREN J. MITCHELL, Maryland PAULA HAWKINS, Florida FREDERICK W. RICHMOND, New York' MACK MATTINGLY, Georgia CLARENCE J. BROWN, Ohio LLOYD BENTSEN, Texas MARGARET M. HECKLER, Massachusetts WILLIAM PROXMIRE, Wisconsin JOHN H. ROUSSELOT, California EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts CHALMERS P. WYLIE, Ohio PAUL S. SARBANES, Maryland JAMES K. GALBRAITH, Executive Director BRucE R. BARTLETT, Deputy Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC GOALS AND INTERGOVEBNMENTAL PoLIor HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SENATE LEE H. HAMILTON, Indiana, Chairman LLOYD BENTSEN, Texas, Vice Chairman RICHARD BOLLING, Missouri PAULA HAWKINS, Florida STEVEN D. SYMMS, Idaho MACK MATTINGLY, Georgia 1 Representative Richmond resigned from the U.S. House of Representatives on Aug. 25, 1982, and Representative Augustus F. Hawkins, of California, was subsequently appointed to the committee on Sept. 23, 1982. CONTENTS WITNESSES AND STATEMENTS WEDNESDAY, OCTOBEB 7, 1981 Reuss, Hon. Henry S., chairman of the Joint Economic Committee: Open- Page ing statement ------------------------------------------------- 1 Weidenbaum, Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Janet Yellen's Legacy at the Federal Reserve
    Journal of Finance and Bank Management December 2019, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 82-87 ISSN: 2333-6064 (Print), 2333-6072 (Online) Copyright © The Author(s). All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research Institute for Policy Development DOI: 10.15640/jfbm.v7n2a6 URL: https://doi.org/10.15640/jfbm.v7n2a6 Janet Yellen’s Legacy at the Federal Reserve Alexander G. Kondeas1 Abstract This paper examines the empirical results of the monetary policies followed by the Federal Reserve during the period of 2010-2018, when Janet Yellen served first as vice chair (2010-2014) and subsequently as chair (2014-2018) of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. As the Central Bank of the United States, the Federal Reserve System (FED) is entrusted with conducting the monetary policy in a way that fulfills the Congressional dual mandate of price stability and full employment. Janet Yellen generally adhered to a dovish view of monetary policy, one that favors looser monetary control and lower interest rates in order to stimulate economic growth. At first glance, the dual mandate was satisfied during her eight years of progressively higher leadership roles at the FED. The economic recovery from the Great Recession (2007- 2008) continued, inflation remained tamed, and the rate of unemployment fell to its lowest level since 1970. Yet a closer look at consumer spending and private fixed investment indicate a sharp decline in the years following the Great Recession and until the end of Yellen’s term at the FED. It is difficult therefore, to argue that the loose monetary policies of her years in office had much of a stimulating effect on the household sector or the business sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Symposium Proceedings, 1998: Income Inequality: Issues And
    The Contributors A.B. Atkinson, Warden, Nuffield College, Oxford University Mr. Atkinson is currently serving as warden of Nuffield College, Oxford University. Previously, he was professor of political econ- omy at the University of Cambridge, and chairman of the Suntory Toyota International Centre at the London School of Economics. A fellow of the British Academy, he is a past president of the Royal Economic Society, the Econometric Society, the European Eco- nomic Association, and the International Economic Association. He has served on the Royal Commission on the Distribution of Income and Wealth, the Pension Law Review Committee, and the Commis- sion on Social Justice. He is also the author or co-author of a number of books dealing with public economic issues and income distribution. Alan S. Blinder, Professor, Princeton University Mr. Blinder is the Gordon S. Rentschler Memorial Professor of Economics and co-director and founder of the Center for Economic Policy Studies at Princeton University where he has been a member of the faculty since 1971. He is also vice chairman of the G-7 Group. Between June 1994 and January 1996, he was vice chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Before joining the Board, he was a member of President Clinton’s Council of Eco- nomic Advisers where he was in charge of macroeconomic forecast- ing and also worked on budget, international trade, and health care issues. Mr. Blinder is the author or co-author of 12 books and scores ix x Contributors of articles on such topics as fiscal policy, monetary policy, and the distribution of income.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Oral History Office University of California the Bancroft Library Berkeley, California
    Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California Charles Schultze Slaying the Dragon of Debt: Fiscal Politics and Policy from the 1970s to the Present A project of the Walter Shorenstein Program in Politics, Policy and Values Interviews conducted by Martin Meeker in 2010 Copyright © 2011 by The Regents of the University of California ii Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of Northern California, the West, and the nation. Oral History is a method of collecting historical information through tape-recorded interviews between a narrator with firsthand knowledge of historically significant events and a well-informed interviewer, with the goal of preserving substantive additions to the historical record. The tape recording is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The corrected manuscript is bound with photographs and illustrative materials and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and in other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. ********************************* All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between The Regents of the University of California and Charles Schultze, dated January 19, 2011. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • Henry Aaron, Brookings Insitution Gilbert Metcalf, Tufts University
    An Open Statement Opposing Proposals for a Gas Tax Holiday In recent weeks, there have been proposals in Congress and by some presidential candidates to suspend the gas tax for the summer. As economists who study issues of energy policy, taxation, public finance, and budgeting, we write to indicate our opposition to this policy. Put simply, suspending the federal tax on gasoline this summer is a bad idea and we oppose it. There are several reasons for this opposition. First, research shows that waiving the gas tax would generate major profits for oil companies rather than significantly lowering prices for consumers. Second, it would encourage people to keep buying costly imported oil and do nothing to encourage conservation. Third, a tax holiday would provide very little relief to families feeling squeezed. Fourth, the gas tax suspension would threaten to increase the already record deficit in the coming year and reduce the amount of money going into the highway trust fund that maintains our infrastructure. Signers of this letter are Democrats, Republicans and Independents. This is not a partisan issue. It is a matter of good public policy. Henry Aaron, Brookings Insitution Gilbert Metcalf, Tufts University Joseph Stiglitz, Columbia University (Nobel Prize in Economics, 2001) James Heckman, University of Chicago (Nobel Prize in Economics, 2000) Daniel Kahneman, Princeton University (Nobel Prize in Economics, 2002) Charles Schultze, Brookings Institution (President of the American Economic Association, 1984, Chairman Council of Economic Advisers 1977-1981, Director, Bureau of the Budget, 1965-1967) Alice Rivlin, Brookings Institution (President of the American Economic Association, 1986, Director of O.M.B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Buttonwood Gathering New York, October 25 - 26, 2010 the Graduate Center/City University of New York
    The Buttonwood Gathering New York, October 25 - 26, 2010 The Graduate Center/City University of New York About the event At last year’s Buttonwood Gathering, National Economic Council Director Larry Summers called on banks to accept the responsibility of greater regulation as a service to their country. Have they taken his words to heart? As the news continues to tell of a weak and jobless recovery, are banks and other financial institutions living up to their responsibilities? Once again in 2010, The Buttonwood Gathering will draw together leading policymakers, banking executives and regulators to discuss restoring trust in the financial system and evaluate our place on the road to recovery. Chair person John Micklethwait, Editor-in-Chief, The Economist The Bagehot lecture Mervyn King, Governor, Bank of England Confirmed speakers Mark Almeida, President, Moody’s Analytics Clifford Asness, Managing & Founding Principal, AQR Capital Management Zanny Minton Beddoes, Economics Editor, The Economist Matthew Bishop, American Business Editor, New York Bureau Chief, The Economist Joshua Bolten, Visiting Professor, Princeton University Joyce Chang, Managing Director and Global Head of Emerging Markets Strategy and Credit Research, JPMorgan James Chanos, Founder and Managing Partner, Kynikos Associates Ed Clark, President and Chief Executive Officer, TD Bank Financial Group Philip Coggan, Capital Markets Editor and Buttonwood Columnist, The Economist Sean Dobson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Amherst Securities Group Former Senator Pete
    [Show full text]
  • Health Care Reform: Healthwill We Care Ever Reform: Willget Weit Right? Ever Get It
    The Thomas Willis Lambeth Lecture Health Care Reform: HealthWill We Care Ever Reform: WillGet WeIt Right? Ever Get It ALICE M. RIVLIN Senior Fellow, The Brookings Institution Right?Visiting Professor, Georgetown University September 27, 2012 THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL HEALTH CARE REFORM: WILL WE EVER GET IT RIGHT? The Thomas Willis Lambeth Lecture in Public Policy is sponsored and published in association with the Department of Public Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill CB# 3435 Abernethy Hall © Alice M. Rivlin 2012. Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3435. All rights reserved. Lecture and publication costs are supported by the generous gift of an anonymous donor. ALICE M. RIVLIN Health Care Reform: Will We Ever Get It Right? HEALTH CARE REFORM: WILL WE EVER GET IT RIGHT? am honored to have been asked to replace the late Elinor Ostrom, who had agreed to give this lecture before her death in June of this year. Elinor I was an original thinker – a constructive maverick who made important contributions to economics from outside the mainstream of the discipline. She was a prolific researcher, who inspired a generation of development economists around the world. She focused on how real people in many parts of the developing world set up their own rules for sustainable management of the common resources on which their lives depend. Many of us were delighted when her contributions were recognized with a Nobel Prize in Economics. In our different ways, Elinor Ostrom and I have both worked at the intersection of economics and political science.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter, INCOME INEQUALITY Regional Analyses Within a Human
    This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Income Inequality: Regional Analyses within a Human Capital Framework Volume Author/Editor: Barry R. Chiswick Volume Publisher: NBER Volume ISBN: 0-870-14264-X Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/chis74-1 Publication Date: 1974 Chapter Title: Front matter, Income Inequality: Regional Analyses within a Human Capital Framework Chapter Author: Barry R. Chiswick Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c3668 Chapter pages in book: (p. -16 - 0) INCOME INEQUALITY Regional Analyses within a Human Capital Framework NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH Human Behavior and Social Institutions 4 Ic Income Inequality RegionalAnalyses within a Human Capital Framework CH BarryR. Chiswick National Bureau of Economic Research and Queens College, C.U.N.Y. ER NationalBureau of Economic Research New York 1974 Distributed by Columbia University Press New York and London Copyright t 1974 by the National Bureau of Economic Research Al! Rights Reserved library of Congress card nO.: 73—88509 ISBN: O—87014—264—X Printed in the United States of America NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH OFFICERS Arthur F. Burns, Honorary Chairman Edwin Kuh, Director. Computer Research Walter W. Heller,Chairman Center J. Wilson Newman, Vice Chairman Hal B. Lacy. Vice Preoident-Research John R. Meyer, President Robert E. Lipsey, Vice President-Research Thomas 0. Flynn, Treasurer Sherman J. Maisel, Co-director NBER. West Douglas H. Eldridge, Vice President. Geoffrey H. Moore, Vice President-Research ExecutiveSec retarv Edward K. Smith, Vice President VictorR. Fuchs, Vice President-Research: Co-director NBER-West DIRECTORS AT LARGE Atherton Bean, international Multifoods Corporation J.
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks at the Memorial of Charles L. Schultze the Brookings Institution November 4, 2016
    Remarks at the memorial of Charles L. Schultze The Brookings Institution November 4, 2016 Remarks by Ted Gayer Vice President, Economic Studies at Brookings Good afternoon, everyone. My name is Ted Gayer, I’m Vice President and Director of the Economic Studies program here at Brookings. I’d like to start by thanking Charlie’s children—Chris, Carol, Lynn, Kathleen, Kevin, and Karen—for asking us to host his memorial service at Brookings. The Economics Studies program is a vibrant intellectual community, a community of experts who analyze, assess, opine, debate (and even at times, argue) about the most critical of economic questions. Most days we are up on this stage discussing big, weighty, global problems. But we should not forget that this place is a local community—a community of colleagues and friends, of people kibitzing about sports and politics and books and music, of people caring for each other and for each others’ families, and of people missing those of our community who are no longer with us. By allowing us to host this memorial service for Charlie, his family has recognized this place as the community that it is, a community of people who deeply respected and cared about Charlie. While I knew of Charlie professionally for much of my adult life given his prominence in the field, I only met him and grew to know him personally about 7 years ago when I first came to Brookings. It’s a heady thing to meet a legend in one’s profession. Heady, but not intimidating, since Charlie was eminently approachable.
    [Show full text]
  • The Honorable Alice Rivlin Award for Leadership Excellence ______
    The Economic Club of New York 444th Meeting 108th year ______________________________ The Honorable Alice Rivlin Award for Leadership Excellence ______________________________ April 21, 2015 Questioners: Glenn Hubbard Columbia University School of Business Former Chair, Economic Club of New York Roger Ferguson President and Chief Executive Officer, TIAA-CREF Former Chair, Economic Club of New York The Economic Club of New York – The Honorable Alice Rivlin – April 21, 2015 Page 1 Introduction Chairman William C. Dudley Good afternoon everybody. Welcome to the 444th meeting of the Economic Club in our 108th year. The Economic Club of New York is the nation’s leading nonpartisan forum for economic policy speeches. More than 1,000 guest speakers have appeared before the Club over the last century and we’ve established a strong tradition of excellence. I want to recognize and thank the 225 members of our Centennial Society. These club members have made an extraordinary contribution to ensure the financial stability of the Club into its second century. Their names are in your program and on our website. Also, I’d like to welcome students from Rutgers Business School, The New School, Barnard, and Fairleigh Dickinson University. Thanks to trustees Abby Joseph Cohen, Glenn Hutchins, and Marie-Josee Kravis, who make their attendance possible today. This is a special lunch. We’re presenting our third Economic Club of New York Award for Leadership Excellence to Alice Rivlin. The prize is given every two years to an individual who has exhibited excellence in leadership in economic policy. Past awards have gone to George Shultz and Paul Volcker.
    [Show full text]
  • In His New Book, a Former Fed Governor Provides a Rare Glimpse of the Inside Workings of the Greenspan Federal Reserve
    Inside the FOMC In his new book, a former Fed governor provides a rare glimpse of the inside workings of the Greenspan Federal Reserve. hen I was sworn in as In the best of all worlds, the FOMC pilot should be a governor on June 20, able to bring a soaring economy right down onto the firm 1996, the economy surface of the maximum sustainable level of output— was in the sixth year of without blowing out all the tires. Unfortunately, as I an expansion. The learned over the next few years, it takes a lot more luck Dow Jones Industrial to land an economy than it does an airplane. Average was up more Nevertheless, it was the issue of bringing the econ- than 20 percent for the omy down to earth that dominated my first FOMC meet- year, manufacturing was picking up steam, and home ing on July 2 and 3, 1996. Walking into the Fed, you get Wsales were hitting their highest marks in a decade. the feeling that important business is being done here. But in the cool confines of the Federal Reserve, the And so it was that day. celebration was muted. Already, many staffers were wor- rying that the strong growth and low level of the unem- S ALICE RIVLIN and I entered the room, we ployment rate would soon encourage workers to demand were welcomed warmly into the club. I had al- higher wages. Those demands, in turn, would begin fu- Aready met the other Board members—Mike eling inflation, which had burned through the economy Kelley, Larry Lindsey, Susan Phillips, Janet Yellen, and, with such destructive force in the 1970s and 1980s.
    [Show full text]