BRAZILIAN Atlas

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

BRAZILIAN Atlas BRAZILIAN / Summary Executive MANGROVES ATlaS BRAZILIANMANGROVES ATlaS BRAZILIANMANGROVES ATlaS Mangroves are one of the most important ecosystems on the planet. With their high productivity, they pro- vide numerous goods and services both to the marine environment and to people. They capture and store carbon in their biomass and soil, reduce the shorelines vulnerability to climate change by reducing the damage of the extreme events and of the rising sea levels, and also prevent erosion, by stabilizing sediments with their tangled root systems. Brazil presents remarkable mangrove conservation efforts, both through the sustainable use by local tradi- tional communities and the protected areas. Neverthe- less, this is not enough yet, particularly due to the high level importance of this ecosystem, which should not be put in danger. The irregular and illegal occupation, the lack of water and sewage treatment system, the changes on rivers and coastlines hydrodynamics, and, mainly, the loss and fragmentation of their vegetation cover are responsible for quality decrease and biodiversity erosion of these ecosys- tems, not to mention the climate changes increasing pres- sures and risks. Therefore, the traditional communities and some economic sectors that depend directly on the mangroves resources are having a hard time to keep their reproduction conditions. Since the beginning of the 20th century, the Brazilian mangroves loss is estimated in 25%. Considering the interest in their high level conservation, the situation is more serious in the Northeast and Southeast regions, where the ecosystem is more fragmented. According to a recent estimation, these regions have lost around 40% of what was once a mangrove continuous area. On the other hand, Brazil has 123 protected areas that cover mangroves areas (58 federal, 46 state and 19 mu- nicipal), of which 83% allow sustainable use and 17% are strict preservation areas. All of these PAs together repre- sent 87% of the whole ecosystems coverage in the country. The mangrove conservation is a priority for the Brazil- ian government. Through the Chico Mendes Institute of Biodiversity Conservation (ICMBio) and the Ministry of Environment, it was possible to elaborate the national pro- gram for the mangrove conservation and sustainable use. The Brazilian Mangroves Atlas is a milestone for this eco- system conservation. The complete version of the document presents the large territory mapping and a diagnosis of the Brazilian mangroves current situation, with the conservation efforts, main threats and key areas under threat. The document also highlights the need for further conser- vation actions on the north coast of Brazil, once it is acknowl- edged as the largest remain-ing well-conserved continuous mangrove areas. The states that contain the largest mangrove areas are Maranhão (505 thousand hectares) Pará (around 390 thousand ha), and Amapá (226 thousand ha). This document is an English version of an executive www.icmbio. summary that aims to highlight the main points of the gov.br/portal/ Atlas. For more details, it is recommended to consult images/stories/ manguezais/atlas_ the full version (in Portuguese), with references and dos_manguezais_ bibliography, available here: do_brasil.pdf THE BRAZILIAN COASTAL ZONE AND THE MANGROVES 2 The Brazilian coast provides a favorable • Around 14,000 km is the environment for the mangroves to es- mangrove extension in the tablish, develop and maintain. The only Brazilian coast; exception is the coast of Rio Grande do • About 80% of the mangroves Sul, because of the state’s high latitudes are distributed in 3 states of the and its climate conditions. Amazon biome: Maranhão (36%), Pará (28%) and Amapá (16%); • 17 states are on the Brazilian coast, 16 of them with mangrove; • The mangrove area in northern Brazil is the largest continuous • 7,408 km of mangrove extension, portion of the ecosystem under including Fernando de Noronha, as legal protection worldwide. the only oceanic mangrove in the South Atlantic; 6 Adriano Gambarini / WWF-Brazil Mangrove in Verde river, Juréia-Itatins Ecological Station, in Brazil 7 Amapá 226,894.81 16.32 Pará 390,589.41 27.92 Maranhão 505,490.12 0.40 Piauí 5,549.86 0.40 RR AP Ceará 19,518.21 1.40 Rio Grande do Norte 13,535.33 0.97 AM PA MA CE RN Paraíba 12,565.22 0.90 PB PI PE Pernambuco 17,172.98 1.23 8 AC AL Alagoas 5,535.27 0.40 TO SE RO BA Sergipe 26,543.63 1.90 MT DF Bahia 89,932.02 0.57 GO MG MANGROVES BY STATE AND ES MS Espírito Santo 7,971.65 0.57 PERCENTAGE IN RELATION TO RJ Rio de Janeiro 13,779.90 0.99 THE TOTAL MANGROVE AREAS SP São Paulo 22,287.26 1.59 PR Paraná 31,199.14 2.23 SC Santa Catarina 10,401.32 0.74 STATE RS AREA (HA) % TOTAL MANGROVE AREAS TOTAL 1,398,966.13 100,00 Clemente Coelho Jr / ICMBio Clemente Coelho Typical mangrove (Avicennia THE MANGROVE FLORA schaueriana mangrove) and marsh In the mangrove, plants demand sun- vegetation (grass Spartina sp.). light (heliophiles), so there are only tree- forming species. They support low con- centrations of oxygen in the sediment, co-exist with salt water (halophyte) and manage to sustain themselves on muddy substrates (poorly consolidated). The aerial structure of mangrove roots, besides serving as a substrate for algae, provides shelter and food for many animals, from fungi and bacteria to larger individuals such as invertebrates, vertebrates and mammals, including the human being. THE MANGROVE FAUNA Unlike the flora, the fauna is not exclu- sive to this ecosystem. Its organisms can survive in other similar habitats, such as estuary, sandbank, rocky shore and even on the beach. Thus, the mangrove eco- system is made up of a complex com- munity, offers several environments for animals and supports the biodiversity in other, particularly marine, ecosystems. The mangrove has fauna representatives of terrestrial, marine and estuarine environments that, Capuchin Monkey, together with the flora species, make Swamp Ghost Crab up the biodiversity of the ecosystem. and White Egret. 9 MANGROVES AND PROTECTED AREAS Protected areas are territorial spaces, Mangroves can be found including their natural resources, in 123 protected areas; with relevant natural characteristics, which have the function to ensure • Area: 16,385 km2; the representation of significant and • 87% of the ecosystem in Brazil; ecologically viable samples of the different populations, habitats and • 58 federal, 46 state and ecosystems of the national territory 22 municipal MPAs; and jurisdictional waters, preserving • 7% are strict preservation areas; the existing biological heritage. In some cases, the sustainable use • 83% are Marine Protected Areas reserves have objectives to assure the that allow sustainable use. conditions for sustainable development of local traditional communities. EXTRACTIVE RESERVES The Brazilian protected areas These category VI protected areas are categories are organized in two used by traditional communities whose groups: strict preservation areas and subsistence is based on the extractiv- sustainable use reserves. The first ism, subsistence farming and small ones aim to protect nature, allowing animal husbandry. The creation of only the indirect use of the natural extractive reserves aims to protect the resources, which does not involve livelihoods and culture of these popula- consumption, collection or damage tions, focusing on the sustainable use to natural resources. of natural resources. Extractive reserves The sustainable use aims to rec- are de facto co-managed by non-indig- oncile nature conservation with the enous traditional communities, with sustainable use of natural resources. important possibilities to strengthen In this group, activities involving conservation conditions and innovate the collection and use of natural on management schemes. resources are permitted, provided that they are practiced in a way that ENVIRONMENTAL ensures the sustainability of renew- PROTECTION AREAS able environmental resources and They are generally large extensions ecological processes. containing a certain degree of human occupation, as well as biotic, abiotic, aesthetic or cultural attributes, all important to the quality of life and well-being of human populations. They are classified as a category V – protected landscape/ seascape, accord- ing the IUCN system. The objective of this category is to protect biological diversity, to discipline the process of occupation, to promote a sustainable 10 land and natural resources use. It is As sustainable use reserves are often up to the managing body to establish large and require a zoning process, the conditions for research and public visitation in these areas. The they are particularly conducive to the category is intrinsically linked to ter- conservation of mangroves, one of the ritorial planning and should restrict most productive and rich ecosystems in the development of potentially harm- ful activities to the environment the world, a place that promotes a social, through the zoning of its territory. cultural and economic relationship between the nature and humans. MAP OF MANGROVES AND PROTECTED AREAS IN BRAZIL 60°W 45°W ´ RR AP ° ° 0 0 AM PA MA CE RN PB PI PE AC AL TO SE RO BA MT S S ° ° 5 5 1 1 DF GO MG ES MS SP RJ PR SC S S ° RS ° 0 MMangrovesanguezais 0 3 3 FederalUCs Fede PAsrais UStateCs E sPAstaduais MunicipalUCs Munici pPAsais 0 250 500 km Limites Estaduais State Borders SiEstserim, Dae dLeo rCmoeo, GrdEeBnCadOa, sN GOAeoAg NráGfDicCa,s a Dnda touthme rS ciorngtarisb u2t0o0rs0 60°W 45°W Geographic Coordinates System Datum Sirgas 2000. SOURCE: IBAMA, IBGE, ICMBio, MMA. - Brazilian Mangroves Atlas. 11 Wigold B. Schäffer / ICMBio Cassurubá (BA) Extractive Reserve. THREATS TO MANGROVES Despite their importance, mangroves grove complex of ecosystems, but, are vulnerable to a number of anthro- following the current legal conditions, pogenic threats, including climate parts of the mangroves are less le- changes. They worsen the stress condi- gally protected than others.
Recommended publications
  • Green Economy in Amapá State, Brazil Progress and Perspectives
    Green economy in Amapá State, Brazil Progress and perspectives Virgilio Viana, Cecilia Viana, Ana Euler, Maryanne Grieg-Gran and Steve Bass Country Report Green economy Keywords: June 2014 green growth; green economy policy; environmental economics; participation; payments for environmental services About the author Virgilio Viana is Chief Executive of the Fundação Amazonas Sustentável (Sustainable Amazonas Foundation) and International Fellow of IIED Cecilia Viana is a consultant and a doctoral student at the Center for Sustainable Development, University of Brasília Ana Euler is President-Director of the Amapá State Forestry Institute and Researcher at Embrapa-AP Maryanne Grieg-Gran is Principal Researcher (Economics) at IIED Steve Bass is Head of IIED’s Sustainable Markets Group Acknowledgements We would like to thank the many participants at the two seminars on green economy in Amapá held in Macapá in March 2012 and March 2013, for their ideas and enthusiasm; the staff of the Fundação Amazonas Sustentável for organising the trip of Amapá government staff to Amazonas; and Laura Jenks of IIED for editorial and project management assistance. The work was made possible by financial support to IIED from UK Aid; however the opinions in this paper are not necessarily those of the UK Government. Produced by IIED’s Sustainable Markets Group The Sustainable Markets Group drives IIED’s efforts to ensure that markets contribute to positive social, environmental and economic outcomes. The group brings together IIED’s work on market governance, business models, market failure, consumption, investment and the economics of climate change. Published by IIED, June 2014 Virgilio Viana, Cecilia Viana, Ana Euler, Maryanne Grieg-Gran and Steve Bass.
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Lion Tamarin Conservation
    ANNUAL REPORT 2020 CONTENTS 46 DONATIONS 72 LEGAL 85 SPECIAL UNIT OBLIGATIONS PROJECTS UNIT UNIT 3 Letter from the CEO 47 COPAÍBAS 62 GEF TERRESTRE 73 FRANCISCANA 86 SUZANO 4 Perspectives Community, Protected Areas Strategies for the CONSERVATION Emergency Call Support 5 FUNBIO 25 years and Indigenous Peoples Project Conservation, Restoration and Conservation in Franciscana 87 PROJETO K 6 Mission, Vision and Values in the Brazilian Amazon and Management of Biodiversity Management Area I Knowledge for Action 7 SDG and Contributions Cerrado Savannah in the Caatinga, Pampa and 76 ENVIRONMENTAL 10 Timeline 50 ARPA Pantanal EDUCATION 16 FUNBIO Amazon Region Protected 64 ATLANTIC FOREST Implementing Environmental GEF AGENCY 16 How We Work Areas Program Biodiversity and Climate Education and Income- 88 17 In Numbers 53 REM MT Change in the Atlantic Forest generation Projects for FUNBIO 20 List of Funding Sources 2020 REDD Early Movers (REM) 65 PROBIO II Improved Environmental 21 Organizational Flow Chart Global Program – Mato Grosso Opportunities Fund of the Quality at Fishing 89 PRO-SPECIES 22 Governance 56 TRADITION AND FUTURE National Public/Private Communities in the State National Strategic Project 23 Transparency IN THE AMAZON Integrated Actions for of Rio de Janeiro for the Conservation of 24 Ethics Committee 57 KAYAPÓ FUND Biodiversity Project 78 MARINE AND FISHERIES Endangered Species 25 Policies and Safeguards 59 A MILLION TREES FOR 67 AMAPÁ FUND RESEARCH 26 National Agencies FUNBIO THE XINGU 68 ABROLHOS LAND Support for Marine and
    [Show full text]
  • Iucn Technical Evaluation Jaú
    WORLD HERITAGE NOMINATION - IUCN TECHNICAL EVALUATION JAÚ NATIONAL PARK (EXTENSION TO FORM THE CENTRAL AMAZON PROTECTED AREAS) (BRAZIL) ID Nº 998 Bis 1. DOCUMENTATION (i) IUCN/WCMC Data Sheet: (10 references) (ii) Additional literature consulted: IUCN, 2000. IUCN Technical Evaluation, Jaú National Park (Brazil). SCM/CNPQ/MCT/IPAAM. 1996. Mamirauá: Plano de Manejo. Manaus: IPAAM. Queiroz, H., and M. E. B. Fernandes. 2001. A Regional Analysis of Geographic Priorities for Biodiversity Conservation in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC; Davis, S. D. et. al. Centres of Plant Diversity. Vol. 3. IUCN; Thorsell, J. and T. Sigaty, 1997. A global overview of forest protected areas on the World Heritage List (Draft). IUCN; Gillet, H. et. al., 1998. A global overview of protected areas on the World Heritage List of particular importance for biodiversity. UNESCO/WCMC/IUCN; Rylands, A. B., 1991. The status of conservation areas in the Brazilian Amazon. WWF, Washington DC; Rojas, M. and C. Castaño, 1990. Areas protegidas de la cuenca del Amazonas. Bogotá, Colombia ; Castaño. C., 1993. Situación general de la conservación de la biodiversidad en la región Amazónica: Evaluación de las áreas protegidas propuestas y estrategias. FAO/CEE/IUCN, Ecuador; Henrique Borges. S and Carvalhes, A., 2000. Bird species of black water inundation forest in the Jaú National Park: their contribution to regional species richness. In Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp 201-214. (iii) Consultations: 5 external reviewers, representatives from the Ministry of Environment, Brazilian Institute of the Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (IBAMA), environmental authorities, from the States of Brasilia and Manaus, local staff of the protected areas from IBAMA and the Mamirauá Institute, and researchers from the University of Florida and the Amazon Research Institute (INPE).
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous and Tribal Peoples of the Pan-Amazon Region
    OAS/Ser.L/V/II. Doc. 176 29 September 2019 Original: Spanish INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Situation of Human Rights of the Indigenous and Tribal Peoples of the Pan-Amazon Region 2019 iachr.org OAS Cataloging-in-Publication Data Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. Situation of human rights of the indigenous and tribal peoples of the Pan-Amazon region : Approved by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights on September 29, 2019. p. ; cm. (OAS. Official records ; OEA/Ser.L/V/II) ISBN 978-0-8270-6931-2 1. Indigenous peoples--Civil rights--Amazon River Region. 2. Indigenous peoples-- Legal status, laws, etc.--Amazon River Region. 3. Human rights--Amazon River Region. I. Title. II. Series. OEA/Ser.L/V/II. Doc.176/19 INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Members Esmeralda Arosemena de Troitiño Joel Hernández García Antonia Urrejola Margarette May Macaulay Francisco José Eguiguren Praeli Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva Flávia Piovesan Executive Secretary Paulo Abrão Assistant Executive Secretary for Monitoring, Promotion and Technical Cooperation María Claudia Pulido Assistant Executive Secretary for the Case, Petition and Precautionary Measure System Marisol Blanchard a.i. Chief of Staff of the Executive Secretariat of the IACHR Fernanda Dos Anjos In collaboration with: Soledad García Muñoz, Special Rapporteurship on Economic, Social, Cultural, and Environmental Rights (ESCER) Approved by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights on September 29, 2019 INDEX EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 INTRODUCTION 19 CHAPTER 1 | INTER-AMERICAN STANDARDS ON INDIGENOUS AND TRIBAL PEOPLES APPLICABLE TO THE PAN-AMAZON REGION 27 A. Inter-American Standards Applicable to Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in the Pan-Amazon Region 29 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Regulations and Knowledge of the Riparians on Access to Fresh Water, Fishing and Associated Resources in the Tapajós River Basin
    ANALYSIS OF THE REGULATIONS AND KNOWLEDGE OF THE RIPARIANS ON ACCESS TO FRESH WATER, FISHING AND ASSOCIATED RESOURCES IN THE TAPAJÓS RIVER BASIN December 2020 Copyright © 2020 – The Nature Conservancy All rights in this publication are reserved by The Nature Conservancy TNC Executive Director: Ian Thompson Conservation Director: Rodrigo Spuri Director of Science: Edenise Garcia Manager for Public Policy and Government Relations: Karen Oliveira ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------- General Coordination Karen Oliveira Manager for Public Policy and Government Relations Scientific Coordination Edenise Garcia Science Director Mariana Soares Science Specialist Technical Coordination Juliana Simões Institutional Development Specialist Lucilene Amaral Conservation Specialist This Report is part of the Tapajós River: Engaging Communities and Protecting Reshwater Ecosystems Project ANALYSIS OF THE REGULATIONS AND KNOWLEDGE OF THE RIPARIANS ON ACCESS TO FRESH WATER, FISHING AND ASSOCIATED RESOURCES IN THE TAPAJÓS RIVER BASIN TECHNICAL TEAM Cássio Alves Pereira (INIAMA) Ádria Oliveira dos Santos (INIAMA) David McGrath (Earth Innovation Institute and UFOPA) José Heder Benatti (Professor UFPA) Renã Margalho (Doctoral student PPGD/UFPA) TECHNICAL SUPPORT Antonia do Socorro Pena da Gama (UFOPA) Review: Sâmela Cristima da Silva Bonfim Translation: Everaldo de Souza Martins Neto ANALYSIS OF THE REGULATIONS AND KNOWLEDGE OF THE RIPARIANS ON ACCESS TO FRESH WATER, FISHING AND ASSOCIATED RESOURCES IN THE TAPAJÓS RIVER BASIN TECHNICAL TEAM Cássio Alves Pereira (INIAMA) Ádria Oliveira dos Santos (INIAMA) David McGrath (Earth Innovation Institute and UFOPA) José Heder Benatti (Professor UFPA) Renã Margalho (Doctoral student PPGD/UFPA) TECHNICAL SUPPORT Antônia do Socorro Pena da Gama (UFOPA) 2020 LIST OF PICTURES, CHARTS AND GRAPHS Figure 1 - Classification of the Tapajós River basin zones according to their occupation history and socioeconomic and environmental dynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges and Prospects of Fisheries Co- Management Under a Marine Extractive Reserve Framework in Northeastern Brazil
    Coastal Management ISSN: 0892-0753 (Print) 1521-0421 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ucmg20 Challenges and Prospects of Fisheries Co- Management under a Marine Extractive Reserve Framework in Northeastern Brazil Rodrigo Leão De Moura , Carolina Viviana Minte-Vera , Isabela Baleeiro Curado , Ronaldo Bastos Francini-Filho , Hélio De Castro Lima Rodrigues , Guilherme Fraga Dutra , Diego Corrêa Alves & Francisco José Bezerra Souto To cite this article: Rodrigo Leão De Moura , Carolina Viviana Minte-Vera , Isabela Baleeiro Curado , Ronaldo Bastos Francini-Filho , Hélio De Castro Lima Rodrigues , Guilherme Fraga Dutra , Diego Corrêa Alves & Francisco José Bezerra Souto (2009) Challenges and Prospects of Fisheries Co-Management under a Marine Extractive Reserve Framework in Northeastern Brazil, Coastal Management, 37:6, 617-632, DOI: 10.1080/08920750903194165 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/08920750903194165 Published online: 06 Nov 2009. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 237 View related articles Citing articles: 21 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ucmg20 Coastal Management, 37:617–632, 2009 Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 0892-0753 print / 1521-0421 online DOI: 10.1080/08920750903194165 Challenges and Prospects of Fisheries Co-Management under a Marine Extractive Reserve Framework in Northeastern Brazil RODRIGO LEAO˜ DE MOURA,1 CAROLINA VIVIANA MINTE-VERA,2
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking and Rebuilding Common Property Systems in Brazil
    WORKSHOP IN POLITICAL THEORY AND POLICY ANAUYSfS 513 NORTH PARK INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON, INDIANA 47408-3186 RETHINKING AND REBUILDING COMMON PROPERTY SYSTEMS IN BRAZIL / ANTONIO CARLOS DIEGUES UNIVERSITY OF SAG PAULO Paper presented at the Fifth Annual Common Property Conference, Bodo, May 1995 I INTRODUCTION Common property regimes ( 'commons') in Brazil should not be considered as forms of social appropriation of territories and natural resources of the past by commoners, frozen in time.. Although some of these systems of communal appropriation are under tremendous threat by land speculation, urbanization and capitalist expansion, recent examples are showing that traditional population ( rubber-tappers, artisanal fishermen and forest harvesters ) are able to reaffirm and rebuild 'commons". Until recently, these I communal appropriation regimes were 'invisible'to the State bureaucracy mainly because 'fcommoners'were politically weak and lived isolated in marginal but usually biologically rich ecosystems, such as the Amazonian and Atlantic coast humid forest, mangroves, riverine areas, etc. These communal social systems existed for a long time in traditional rural and coastal communities and are characterized by a common utilization of land ( sea) areas, using renewable resources such as fish, forest and medicinal plants, cattle and products of shifting agriculture. Some of these appropriation regimes are mixed ones, as in addition to communal property there is also private/family appropriation of vegetable gardens,domesticated animals,etc.One main feature of these regimes are the intensive use and dependance of renewable resources and loose relationships with the market economy. These systems occur in communities where social organization is based on kinship relationships that are responsible for the exclusion/inclusion of people in the use of the resources.
    [Show full text]
  • The Context of REDD+ in Brazil Drivers, Agents and Institutions
    OCCASIONAL PAPER The context of REDD+ in Brazil Drivers, agents and institutions Second edition Peter H. May Brent Millikan Maria Fernanda Gebara OCCASIONAL PAPER 55 The context of REDD+ in Brazil Drivers, agents and institutions Second edition Peter H. May Brent Millikan Maria Fernanda Gebara Occasional Paper 55 © 2011 Center for International Forestry Research All rights reserved Printed in Indonesia ISBN 978-602-8693-28-8 May, P.H., Millikan, B. and Gebara, M.F. 2011 The context of REDD+ in Brazil: Drivers, agents and institutions. Occasional paper 55. 2nd edition. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia. Cover photo by Luke Perry CIFOR Jl. CIFOR, Situ Gede Bogor Barat 16115 Indonesia T +62 (251) 8622-622 F +62 (251) 8622-100 E [email protected] www.cifor.org Any views expressed in this paper are those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of CIFOR, the authors’ institutions or the financial sponsors of this paper. Contents Abbreviations v Executive summary viii Resumo executivo x 1 Introduction 1 1.1. Current forest cover and historical overview of forest cover change 3 1.2. Review of the main drivers of forest cover change 7 1.3. Mitigation potential 16 2 Forests, land use trends and drivers of deforestation and degradation 3 2.1. Governance in the forest margins 19 2.2. Decentralisation and benefit sharing 25 2.3. Tenure issues 26 3 Institutional environment and distributional aspects 19 3.1. Political-economic context of drivers of deforestation and degradation 33 4 The political economy of deforestation and degradation 33 4.1. Broader climate change policy context 37 4.2.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Accepted Contributions – Poster
    List of Accepted Contributions – Poster Refnum Last Name First Name Title D6K0ZZY1 Aburto Jaime An unprecedented Participatory-Action- Research and collaborative work is now developing between scientist and some local fishers organizations IFPD9PCC Aceves-Bueno Erendira Informing the design of Territorial Use Rights in Fisheries (TURFs) from Marine Protected Area theory 7TD8S2PE Alarcon Daniela Extractive Reserve of Canavieiras, Bahia, Brazil: Management Agreement R8T3J0LN Alvarado Juan Composition and biomass analysis of the reef fish community in Cocos Island National Park after 13 years of total fishing closure L4VW423Y Andrade Claudia Assessing benthic secondary production in marine communities of the Magellan region: an approach to consider for management purposes 2O6I0SM5 Andrade Solange Life history of the Mottled scorpionfish (Pontinus clemensi) in the Galapagos Marine Reserve, Ecuador 5AKUAXX7 Angarita-Jimenez Luz Elvira Protection of Polymesoda artacta in via salamanca island park as a strategy for the development of communities and coastal marine ecosystems - Colombian caribbean GG88IVNM Apprill Amy Remote sensing of Patagonian large whale health using drones 9LSVDWO4 Arroyo Maria Elisa Digital material synthesized on the MCPA- MU Pitipalena Añihue and work experience for effective management, reflecting the following components: A2SXV125 AUBINET Maxime Underwater landscapes :To Reveal and make perceive in order to raise awarness on the underwater world, an assistance in the management of a protected marine area GVACR6OS Bahamonde
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional People and Communities, Biodiversity, Water, and Climate Change August 2016
    Challenges and Opportunities for Conservation, Agricultural Production, and Social Inclusion in the Cerrado Biome August 2016 Technical Annex: Traditional People and Communities, Biodiversity, Water, and Climate Change August 2016 This technical annex accompanies the “Challenges and Opportunities for Conservation, Agricultural Production, and Social Inclusion in the Cerrado Biome” report, developed for the Climate and Land Use Alliance by CEA Consulting. The full report and associated materials can be found at: www.climateandlandusealliance.org/reports/cerrado/ v Table of Contents Traditional people and communities 3 Biodiversity and protected areas 16 Water in the Cerrado 30 Climate change and the Cerrado 43 2 TRADITIONAL PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES 3 Traditional people and communities in the Cerrado • The Matopiba region of the Cerrado is home to a rich diversity of cultures and people. It is an active area for family farmers and traditional forms of agriculture (including communal and extractive use of the land). It is also one of the poorest regions in the country. • The most representative groups in the Cerrado are: indigenous people, quilombolas (descendants of former African slaves), extractivists, geraizeiros (artisanal farmers in Minas Gerais and Bahia), and groups that subsist in riverine environments (ribeirinhos and vazanteiros). • In the Cerrado, traditional communities do not a strong political presence. Interviewees noted that this lack of capacity is a result of the lack of public and international attention historically given to the biome. • The initiatives aimed at protecting these communities are dispersed across the biome and there is a lack of coordination among them. • The most vocal groups tend to be completely opposed to the current agribusiness model, which is seen by many as a threat to the communities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of the Chico Mendes Extractive Reserve in Acre, Brazil
    DYNAMICS OF LAND USE IN AN AMAZONIAN EXTRACTIVE RESERVE: THE CASE OF THE CHICO MENDES EXTRACTIVE RESERVE IN ACRE, BRAZIL By CARLOS VALÉRIO AGUIAR GOMES A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2001 Copyright 2001 by Carlos Valério Aguiar Gomes To Leinha for everything ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This thesis could not have been completed without the help and support of a variety of friends, colleagues and mentors. First I thank Dr. Michael Binford, my supervisor for all his help, and constructive criticism, which helped me to strengthen my intellectual independence. I am very thankful to the members of my committee: Dr. Marianne Schmink, Dr. Nigel Smith and Dr. Stephen Perz for their valuable comments, suggestions and guidance. I specially wish to express my deepest appreciation to Dr. Schmink for being a constant source of support and encouragement since I first thought about coming to study in the United States. I gratefully acknowledge the support of the Latin American Scholar Program for American Universities (LASPAU)-Fulbright Commission for the fellowship that allowed my enrollment in the graduate school at the University of Florida. In LASPAU I want to thank Ms. Sonia Wallemberg for her wonderful assistance and friendship. I am also grateful to Ms. Rebecca Smith-Murdock and Mr. Amir Abbassi (from the Intensive English Language Institute of the University of North Texas) for the fellowship for English language training. Moreover, I would like to thank the World Wildlife Fund (WWF-Brazil), the Tropical Conservation and Development Program (TCD) at the University of Florida, and the Acre Environmental Agency (IMAC) for funding my research in Acre.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Approaches to the Brazilian Amazon: the Bumpy Road Toward Sustainable Development
    LCR Sustainable Development Working Paper No. 13 World Bank Approaches to the Brazilian Amazon: The Bumpy Road toward Sustainable Development November 2002 John Redwood III The World Bank Latin America and Caribbean Region Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Department (LCSES) John Redwood III is Director of the Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Unit (LCSES) of the World Bank’s Latin America and Caribbean Regional Office. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions in this document are attributable to the author, and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, its affiliated organizations, members of its Board of Executive Directors or the countries they represent. This working paper series is produced by the Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Sector Management Unit of the Latin America and Caribbean Regional Office. Additional copies may be obtained either from the author, or from LCSES Program Assistant Peter Brandriss ([email protected], or tel. 202-473-9379). Cover photo by John Redwood III Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms .................................................................................................v Introduction..............................................................................................................................1 The 1970s and 1980s: Mining, Infrastructure, and Integrated Regional Development ....2 Carajás.................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]