DOCSLIB.ORG

1974/12/26 HR5056 Crediting Aviation Midshipman Service” of the White House Records Office: Legislation Case Files at the Gerald R

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1974/12/26 HR5056 Crediting Aviation Midshipman Service” of the White House Records Office: Legislation Case Files at the Gerald R The original documents are located in Box 16, folder “1974/12/26 HR5056 Crediting Aviation Midshipman Service” of the White House Records Office: Legislation Case Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Exact duplicates within this folder were not digitized. Digitized from Box 16 of the White House Records Office Legislation Case Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE ACTION WASHINGTON Last Day: December 27 December 23, 1974 MEMORANDUM FOR: THE ~RES/oENT FROM: KEN~ SUBJECT: Enrolled Bill H.R. 5056 - Crediting Aviation Midshipman Service Attached for your consideration is H.R. 5056, sponsored by Representative McFall, which provides that time spent as an aviation midshipman in the Navy may be credited, as in the case of commissioned officers, for regular and reserve pay and retirement purposes. OMB recommends approval and provides you with additional background information in its enrolled bill report (Tab A). NSC, Max Friedersdorf and Phil Areeda recommend approval. RECOMMENDATION That you sign H.R. 5056 (Tab B). EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT ~~\~'\~, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503 ~<tS~ t'O ~ DEC 2 0 1W4 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT Subject: Enrolled Bill H.R. 5056 - Crediting Aviation Midshipman Service Sponsor - Rep. McFall (D) California . Last Day for Action December 27, 1974 - Friday Purpose Provides that time spent as an aviation midshipman in the Navy may be credited for certain military pay and retirement purposes. Agency Recommendations Office of Management and Budget Approval Department of Defense Approval Discussion During the period 1946 to 1951 naval aviators were trained, and served their first two years on active duty, as aviation midshipmen. In the other services and in the Navy since 1951, such training and duty were and are performed in the status of commissioned officer, the status which aviation midshipmen were given at the successful completion of two years of active service. H.R. 5056 provides that time spent in the status of aviation midshipman may be credited, as in the case of commissioned officers, for regular and reserve pay and retirement purposes. Assistant Director for Legislative Reference Enclosures EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503 DEC 2 0 1974 jr., }() ,~.r :lh . I '" I .,A1 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT Subject: Enrolled Bill H.R. 5056 - Crediting Aviation Midshipman Service Sponsor - Rep. McFa~l (D) California Last Day for Action December 27, 1974 - Friday Purpose Provides that time spent as an aviation midshipman in the Navy may be credited for certain military pay and retirement purposes. Asency Recommendations Office of Management and Budget Approval Department of Defense Approval Discussion During the period 1946 to 1951 naval aviators were trained, and served their first two years on active duty, as aviation midshipmen. In the other services and in the Navy since 1951, such training and duty were ~nd are performed in the status of commissioned officer, the status which aviation midshipmen were given at the successful completion of two years of active service. · H.R. 5056 provides that time spent in the status of aviation midshipman may be credited, as in the case of commissioned officers, for regular and reserve pay and ~etirement purposes. 1ru.p_1t ~M,£ Assistant Director for Legislative Reference Enclosures THE WHITE· HQ)JSE ACTION MEMORANDUM WASHINGTON LOG NO.: 1 Time: Date: December 20 1 1974 : 30 P~ • FOR ACTION: NSC/S _~ _ cc (for inf(jrmation): rre endriks Bhil Areeda -L.Y• - IJ Jerry J nes Max Priederador~ FROM THE STAFF SECRETARY DUE: Date: llonday, December 2 3 Time: noon SUBJECT: Enrolled Bill H.R. 5056 - Crediting Aviation Midshipman Service ACTION REQUESTED: --For Necesscuy Action .....--.. For Your Recommendations --Prepwe Agenda and Brief ___ Draft Reply -X-- For Your Comments Draft Remarks REMARKS: Please return to Judy Johnston, Ground Floor West finq PLEASE ATTACH THIS COPY TO MATERIAL SUBMIT'I If you have any questions or if you anticipate a delay in submitting the required material, please K. R. COLE, JR. telephone the Staff Secretary immediately. For the President DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON. D. C. 20350 December 18, 1974 Dear Mr. Ash: Your transmittal sheet dated December 16, 1974, enclosing a facsimile of an enrolled bill of Congress, H.R. 5056, "To provide for crediting service as an aviation midshipman for purposes of retirement for nonregular service under chapter 67 of title 10, United States Code, and for pay purposes under title 37, United States Code," and requesting the comments of the Department of Defense, has been received. The Department of the Navy has been assigned the responsibility for the preparation of a report expressing the views of the Department of Defense. Section 1 of H.R. 5056 would authorize service as an aviation midshipman to be counted in determining eligibility for receipt of retired pay and in determining years of service for the purpose of computing retired pay under chapter 67 of title 10, United States Code. Section 2 of H.R. 5056 would authorize service as an aviation midshipman to be counted in determining years of service under section 205 of title 37, United States Code, for the purpose of computing the pay, allowances, and other benefits to which members of the uniformed services or their dependents will become entitled under title 37 for service performed on and after the date of enactment of the legislation. Section 2 would also authorize service as an aviation midshipman to be credited in deter­ mining the rate of basic pay used in computing retired pay for persons who become entitled to retired pay under section 1331 of title 10 on and after the date of enactment of the legislation. As used in H.R. 5056, the term "aviation midshipman" refers to a person who was enrolled as a naval aviation officer candidate in accordance with section 3(b) of the Act of August 13, 1946, chapter 962 (60 Stat. 1057), as amended; was appointed a midshipman in the Navy and ordered to active duty for flight training in accordance with section 3(b) of the Act; upon satisfactory completion of flight training, was designated a naval aviator and assigned to duty involving flying in accordance with section 5 of the Act; and, following satisfactory completion of two years of flight training and flight duty as a midshipman, was commissioned in accordance with section 6(a)(2) of the Act. The Navy's aviation midshipman program authorized by the Act was discontinued after a brief trial; authority for the program has been repealed. The Comptroller General has ruled that aviation midshipman service may be counted for the purpose of determining eligibility for retirement under section 6323 of title 10, United States Code (42 Comp. Gen. 669). H.R. 5056 would provide the same benefit for purposes of determining eligibility to receive retired pay for nonregular service. The approval of this legislation would result in no increase in the budgetary requirements of the Department of Defense. The Department of the Navy, on behalf of the Department of Defense, recommends approval of H.R. 5056. Sincerely yours, D. s. Potter Under Secretary of the Navy Honorable Roy L. Ash Director, Office of Management and Budget Washington, D.C. 20503 2 ~~- -------·-·-----'·----~- THE WHITE HOCSE ACTIO~ :\lE:.\lOR:\XDC:.\1 WASJ!l:.OGTON LOG NO.: 810 Date: December 20, 1974 Time: 9:30 p.m. FOR ACTION: NSC/S cc (for information): Warren Hendriks Phil Areeda v Jerry Jones Max Friedersdorf FROM THE S'FAFF SECRETARY • DUE: Date: Monday, December 23 Time: noon SUBJECT: Enrolled Bill H.R. 5056 - Crediting Aviation Midshipman Service ACTION REQUESTED: --For Necessa.ry Action ..x-- For Your Recommenda.tions -- Prepa.re Agenda. and Brief --Dra.ft Reply ...x...___ For Your Comments --Draft Rema.rks REMARKS: Please return to Judy Johnston, Ground Floor West Wing y -- PLEASE ATTACH THIS COPY TO M...I\TERIAL SUBMITTED. I£ you have any questions or i£ you cmticipa.te o. clelo.y in submiUing tho raquired mo.:exial, please Warren K. Hendriks­ telephone the Sta!£ Secre~o..ry immedio.t~ly. For the President THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON December 23, 1974 MEMORANDUM FOR: WARREN HENDRIKS FROM: MAX L. FRIEDERSDORF SU~JECT: Action Memorandum - Log No. 810 Enrolled Bill H. R. 5056 - Crediting Aviation Midshipman Service The Office of Legislative Affairs concurs in the attached proposal and has no additional recommendations. Attachment 93n CoNGRESS } HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES REPORT f!d Session No. 93-1386 CREDITING OF CERTAIN SERVICE FOR Pl:JRPOSES OF RESERVE RETIREMENT SEPTEMBER 30, 1974.-Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be .Printed , Mr. STRATrON, from the Committee on Armed Services, submitted the following REPORT [To acorppany H.R.. 5056] The Committee on Armed Services, to whom was referred the bill (H.R. 5056) to provide for crediting service as an aviationmidship­ man for purposes of retirement for nonregular Service under chapter 87 of title 10, United States Code, and for pay purposes under title 37, United States Code, h.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PROMOTION REQUIREMENTS for CAP Members
    PROMOTION REQUIREMENTS for CAP Members BY JOHN W. TALBOTT, Lt Col, CAP NEBRASKA WING Developed on 03/15/02 Update on 26 February 2006 AIR FORCE OFFICER RANKS Colonel (O-6) (Col) Second Lieutenant (O-1) (2nd Lt) st Brigadier General (O-7) (Brig Gen) First Lieutenant (O-2) (1 Lt) Captain (O-3) (Capt) Major General (08) (Maj Gen) Major (O-4) (Maj) Army Air Corps Lieutenant Colonel (O-5) (Lt Col) AIR FORCE NCO RANKS Chief Master Sergeant (E-9) (CMsgt) Senior Master Sergeant (E-8) (SMsgt) Master Sergeant (E-7) (Msgt) Technical Sergeant (E-6) (Tsgt) Staff Sergeant (E-5) (Ssgt) CAP Flight Officers Rank Flight Officer: Technical Flight Officer Senior Flight Officer NOTE: The following is a compilation of CAP Regulation 50-17 and CAP 35-5. It is provided as a quick way of evaluating the promotion and training requirements for CAP members, and is not to be treated as an authoritative document, but instead it is provided to assist CAP members in understanding how the two different regulations are inter-related. Since regulations change from time to time, it is recommended that an individual using this document consult the actual regulations when an actual promotion is being evaluated or submitted. Individual section of the pertinent regulations are included, and marked. John W. Talbott, Lt Col, CAP The following are the requirements for various specialty tracks. (Example: promotion to the various ranks for senior Personnel, Cadet Programs, etc.) members in Civil Air Patrol (CAP): For promotion to SFO, one needs to complete 18 months as a TFO, (See CAPR 35-5 for further details.) and have completed level 2: (Attend Squadron Leadership School, complete Initially, all Civil Air Patrol the CAP Officer course ECI Course 13 members who are 18 years or older are or military equivalent, and completes the considered senior members, (with no requirements for a Technician rating in a senior member rank worn), when they specialty track (this is completed for join Civil Air Patrol.
    [Show full text]
  • NSIAD-91-54 Flying Hours: Overview of Navy and Marine Corps Flight Operations
    United States General Accountinr! Office Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee GAO on Defense, Committee on Appropriations, U.S. Senate April 1991 FLYING HOURS Overview of Navy and Marine Corps Flight Operations WIll143694IllI llll1 GAO,‘NSIAD-91-54 i , i ’ United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20648 National Security and International Affairs Division B-241707 April 12,199l The Honorable Daniel K. Inouye Chairman, Subcommittee on Defense Committee on Appropriations United States Senate Dear Mr. Chairman: As you requested, we reviewed the Navy’s flying hour program to determine l what types of aviators are flying carrier-based aircraft, l the types and amounts of flying performed by such aviators, and . the relevancy of the flying to operations and training. We focused on the A-6, F-14, and F/A-18 carrier-based aircraft, although we also reviewed the flying hour program as it relates to other carrier-based aircraft. The information pertains to naval aviation prior to the commencement of Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm. While the concepts discussed in the report and the prior years data presented are still relevant, the fiscal year 1991 budget data do not reflect the commencement of the air war in January 1991. The Navy and Marine Corps need well-trained, highly skilled aviators to Background effectively and successfully accomplish their aviation missions. The skills demanded of an adept aviator include the ability to strike naval and land targets, protect ships from air threats, and take off from and land on aircraft carriers. An aviator’s primary means of gaining and maintaining proficiency is through hands-on training funded by the flying hour program.
    [Show full text]
  • USNA Service Assignment
    USNA Service Assignment Annual Parent Club Officer Conference October 30th, 2020 CAPT W. Scott Switzer, USN Deputy Commandant for Professional Development 1 Service Assignment Philosophy • Process Goal: match qualifications, talent, aptitudes, and desires with Navy and USMC accession requirements to provide Midshipmen fleet with best qualified Officers Midshipmen Performance & Preferences • Aptitude Our mission: BEST FIT assignments •USNA is the Navy’s premier source for Unrestricted Line warfare officers (URL) Needs of Navy & USMC 95% of the class will be assigned URL or USMC Analogous to Fleet Detailing 2 Service Communities Unrestricted Line Officers Restricted Line Officers (95% of Class) (5% of Class) • Surface Warfare Officer (SWO) • Medical/Dental ― Nuclear SWO • Aviation Maintenance Duty Officer ― SWO Options (Engineering Duty Officer, • Civil Engineering Corps Intelligence, Oceanography, Information Professional, Cryptologic Warfare) • Supply Corps • Pilot • Information Warfare Community • Naval Flight Officer (NFO) ― Intelligence Officer ― Oceanography Officer • Submarine ― Information Professional • USMC (up to 25% of class) ― Cryptologic Warfare Officer ― Ground ― Cyber Warfare Engineer ― Pilot ― Cyber Operations 3 Midshipmen to Fleet/USMC Officers – Career Information/Training Program 1/C Year 1/C, 2/C, 3/C, 4/C Service Assignment Career Information - Briefs - Community/Service Specific Screening - Briefs Preference Entry - Junior Officer Forum Commissioning - Community/Service Assignment Boards - Career Interest Survey -
    [Show full text]
  • PDF File, 139.89 KB
    Armed Forces Equivalent Ranks Order Men Women Royal New Zealand New Zealand Army Royal New Zealand New Zealand Naval New Zealand Royal New Zealand Navy: Women’s Air Force: Forces Army Air Force Royal New Zealand New Zealand Royal Women’s Auxilliary Naval Service Women’s Royal New Zealand Air Force Army Corps Nursing Corps Officers Officers Officers Officers Officers Officers Officers Vice-Admiral Lieutenant-General Air Marshal No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent Rear-Admiral Major-General Air Vice-Marshal No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent Commodore, 1st and Brigadier Air Commodore No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent 2nd Class Captain Colonel Group Captain Superintendent Colonel Matron-in-Chief Group Officer Commander Lieutenant-Colonel Wing Commander Chief Officer Lieutenant-Colonel Principal Matron Wing Officer Lieutentant- Major Squadron Leader First Officer Major Matron Squadron Officer Commander Lieutenant Captain Flight Lieutenant Second Officer Captain Charge Sister Flight Officer Sub-Lieutenant Lieutenant Flying Officer Third Officer Lieutenant Sister Section Officer Senior Commis- sioned Officer Lieutenant Flying Officer Third Officer Lieutenant Sister Section Officer (Branch List) { { Pilot Officer Acting Pilot Officer Probationary Assistant Section Acting Sub-Lieuten- 2nd Lieutenant but junior to Third Officer 2nd Lieutenant No equivalent Officer ant Navy and Army { ranks) Commissioned Officer No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No equivalent No
    [Show full text]
  • Short History of the Specialist Rank by CSM Dan Elder When Washington
    Short History of the Specialist Rank By CSM Dan Elder When Washington assumed the role as Commander in Chief of the fledgling Continental Army in 1775, it had adopted the British model of organization. There were basically four enlisted grades, sergeants, corporal, musicians and privates. The musicians were fifers and drummers, who of course directed the linear movements of the Army. If the sergeants, corporals and privates were the combatants, it could be a stretch to argue that those musicians were the Army’s first “specialists.” Though no special rank insignia signified enlisted soldiers of that era, Washington directed that sergeants and corporals would wear epaulettes sewn on their right shoulder, red for sergeants and green for corporals. During the winter of 1776-1777, Washington ordered the establishment of three artillery regiments. In the Army’s 1967 comprehensive Enlisted Grade Structure Study noted, “Artillerymen were recognized as specialists from the start and were given higher pay than Infantryman.” It also noted a need for other “specialists” in the enlisted ranks to perform certain technical skills for the artillery. During this period service and support tasks were typically performed by civilians or detailed enlisted soldiers from the line. When Gen Washington ordered the formation of three artillery regiments, he directed one regiment to be “artificers” to be employed in performing “essential specialist services” for the other two. These men were to be later known as “enlisted men of Ordnance” instead of artillerymen. The artificers included carpenters, blacksmiths, wheelwrights, turners, tinmen, harness makers and farriers. In 1777 the Congress noted the need for a “slightly different organization” in providing a regiment of Cavalry.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuskegee Airmen Chronology Daniel L. Haulman Organizational
    TUSKEGEE AIRMEN CHRONOLOGY DANIEL L. HAULMAN ORGANIZATIONAL HISTORY BRANCH AIR FORCE HISTORICAL RESEARCH AGENCY MAXWELL AFB, AL 36112-6424 14 November 2011 1 TUSKEGEE AIRMEN CHRONOLOGY Dr. Daniel L. Haulman Chief, Organization History Division Air Force Historical Research Agency Expanded Edition: 30 September 2011 27 June 1939: Congress passed the Civilian Pilot Training Act. (Robert J. Jakeman, The Divided Skies.) September-October 1939: The Civil Aeronautics Administration received Tuskegee Institute’s application to be a civilian pilot training institution, and after Tuskegee obtained permission to use the Montgomery Airport as a facility, the application was approved. (Robert J. Jakeman, The Divided Skies) Late February 1940: The Civil Aeronautics Authority approved Tuskegee’s Kennedy Field for Civilian Pilot Training, after improvements to the field, eliminating Tuskegee Institute’s need to use the Montgomery Airport. (Robert J. Jakeman, The Divided Skies) 25 March 1940: George A. Wiggs arrived in Tuskegee to administer the standard written examination required of all Civilian Pilot Training students. Every student who took the examination passed, surpassing the passing rate of other schools in the South. (Robert J. Jakeman, The Divided Skies.) 16 September 1940: Congress passed a Selective Service Act which required all the armed services to enlist “Negroes”. On the same day, the War Department announced that the Civil Aeronautics Authority, in cooperation with the U.S. Army, would start the development of “colored personnel” for the aviation service. (Public Law 783, 16 September 1940; War Department Press Release, 16 September 1940; 99th Fighter Squadron summary history in the lineage and honors folder of the 99th Flying Training Squadron at the Air Force Historical Research Agency (AFHRA), Maxwell AFB, AL) Late October 1940: In a press release, President Franklin D.
    [Show full text]
  • CAP Grade Abbreviations – As Per CAPR 35-5 and CAPR 52-16 Air
    CAP Grade Abbreviations – as per CAPR 35-5 and CAPR 52-16 For use in internal CAP communications and correspondence NOTE: Spell out the grade the first time you use it in your release/article then use the correct abbreviation after that. Senior Member Grades Cadet Member Grades Senior Member SM Cadet Basic C/AB Staff Sergeant SSgt Cadet Airman C/Amn Technical Sergeant TSgt Cadet Airman First Class C/A1C Master Sergeant MSgt Cadet Senior Airman C/SRA Senior Master Sergeant SMSgt Cadet Staff Sergeant C/SSgt Chief Master Sergeant CMSgt Cadet Technical Sergeant C/TSgt Flight Officer FO Cadet Master Sergeant C/MSgt Technical Flight Officer TFO Cadet Senior Master Sergeant C/SMSgt Senior Flight Officer SFO Cadet Chief Master Sergeant C/CMSgt Second Lieutenant 2d Lt Cadet Second Lieutenant C/2d Lt First Lieutenant 1st Lt Cadet First Lieutenant C/1st Lt Captain Capt Cadet Captain C/Capt Major Maj Cadet Major C/Maj Lieutenant Colonel Lt Col Cadet Lieutenant Colonel C/Lt Col Colonel Col Cadet Colonel C/Col Brigadier General Brig Gen Major General Maj Gen Air Force (CAP) Grades as per the AP Style Guide For use in Public Affairs Products NOTE: Spell out the grade the first time you use it in your release/article then use the correct abbreviation after that. Note: The AP Style guide does not give guidance for cadet grades so spell out “Cadet” before the appropriate abbreviation to denote the appropriate cadet grade. Flight Officer grades are not reflected in the guide so by analogy, we suggest the abbreviations below.
    [Show full text]
  • What Every Airman Needs to Know About Medical Stability Operations
    Feature What Every Airman Needs to Know about Medical Stability Operations Col Stephen Waller, MD, USAF, Retired Lt Col Jose Fonseca, USAF, Retired Col Joseph Anderson, USAF, MC Col James Fike, USAF, MC, Retired Col Sean Murphy, USAF, MC he multidimensional complexity of stability operations has cap- tured much attention in the Air Force. Key features of these op- erations include humanitarian relief, reconstruction of emer- Tgency infrastructure, provision of essential government services, and maintenance of a safe, secure environment. “Military health support” plays an everyday, vital role in each of these features.1 Because stability operations call upon a wide array of unique Air Force capabilities, the service’s future leaders will need an understanding of this aspect of agile combat support and building partnerships to effectively conduct not only these operations but also those involving airpower. January–February 2012 Air & Space Power Journal | 1 Feature Waller, Fonseca, Anderson, Fike, & Murphy Medical Stability Operations In the context of past military campaigns, medical stability operations (MSO) may seem more appropriate for the Red Cross or the US Agency for International Development (USAID), not the Air Force or Depart- ment of Defense (DOD). The new MSO paradigm has vast breadth and many dimensions of support for wider national security goals. This ar- ticle examines some historical successes involving MSOs and lessons learned. It then discusses the many dimensions of these operations, taken from DOD Instruction (DODI) 6000.16, Military Health Support for Stability Operations, which states that they shall “be explicitly addressed and integrated across all MHS [Military Health System] activities includ- ing doctrine, organization, training, education, exercises, materiel, lead- ership, personnel, facilities, and planning.”2 Using this framework, the authors hope to help future Air Force leaders better understand how the DOD implements this essential task, “a core U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement to the London Gazette, Ist July 1969 6793
    SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, IST JULY 1969 6793 ENGINEER BRANCH MEDICAL TECHNICIAN BRANCH Promotion (MEDICAL SECTION) Flying Officer to Flight Lieutenant : Retirement M. P. KEITCH (684988). 26th Jun. 1969. Squadron Leader J. A. H. RUSSELL (522815). G. L. PERRY, B.Sc., A.C.G.I. (507682). 30th 14th Jun. 1969. Jun. 1969. EDUCATION BRANCH Retirement Promotion Wing Commander K. F. VENN, D.C.Ae., C.Eng., A.F.R.Ae.S., A.M.B.I.M. (49526) (at own request). Flight Lieutenant to Squadron Leader : 31st May 1969. B. O'HARE, B.Com. (506119). 30th Jun 1969. Squadron Leaders : PROVOST BRANCH J. T. C. BYRNE, C.Eng., M.I.Mech.E. (44587) Promotion (at own request). 30th May 1969. H. R. PORTER, CEng., A.F.R.Ae.S. (50059). 26th Flying Officer to Flight Lieutenant : Jun. 1969. A. C. P. SEYMOUR (4335200). 28th Jun. 1969. Flight Lieutenant A. C. FIFE (563648). 20th CATERING BRANCH Jun. 1969. Retirement Flying Officer C. G. CHURCH (195362), (on ENGINEER (PHOTOGRAPHY) BRANCH account of medical unntness for Air Force service). Transfer to the General List 30th Jun. 1969. The undermentioned Squadron Leaders are trans- ferred to the General List from 1st Jul. 1969: PHYSICAL FITNESS BRANCH W. H. P. BROWN (4036978). Transfer to the General List W. J. COLE (3025154). Squadron Leader F. W. LAST, D.Phys.Ed. Promotion (504847) is transferred to the General List from 1st Jul. 1969. Flying Officer to Flight Lieutenant: G. J. BROWN (4253831). 27th Jun. 1969. Promotion Flying Officer to Flight Lieutenant : EQUIPMENT BRANCH E. W. WAGHORN (3032427).
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Officer Flight Warrant Officer Army
    Aviation Officer Flight Warrant Officer Army Sometimes embroiled Rafael perish her specs conservatively, but uppity Tiebold recapping forwhy or form parentally. Earthquaking Reube besots farther while Aron always substantialize his gridirons cudgels visibly, he remigrated so daintily. Distent Dougie temper that analgesic riving diabolically and hemes inchoately. What cost of service was that moment, flight officer aviation army warrant officers, gravitational forces began to cloudy skies overnight with two to be changed in a dangerous reconnaissance How much more information as determined by aviation army aviator would be used warrant officers perform specialties are appointed as a scholarship or tried to your inbox every major. Apache pilots take bath and ripple more expensive to although, the country Justice, Ohio Army National Guard. All the warrant officers were allowed to serve as the date of pilots to this position themselves, and his cousin, officer aviation flight warrant. Applicants must fill above the Officer Programs Application form a submit itself via their place of command. Army has not shortage of boat helicopter pilots even though it ban the money and train them. They support state wide stretch of Army missions throughout their careers. Recruits need up to aviation flight. Part of becoming an Army warrant treaty is the ability to navigate through it sometimes difficult and frustrating application process and speak be viewed as against first test toward becoming a volatile officer. Rapid wartime reassignments were part compare the problem. But, rewritten, saluting has evolved from history. It allows you grow start earning a tablet the neither you finish college. To bill an AWO, Combat Action general, are the airlines impacting your shortfall? Additionally, so is shared by all media tokens.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Medical Specialist Corps in Vietnam Colonel Ann M
    Army Medical Specialist Corps in Vietnam Colonel Ann M. Ritchie Hartwick Background Medical Groups which were established and dissolved as medical needs dictated throughout Though American military advisers had been the war. On 1 March 1970, Army medical dual in French Indochina since World War II, staff functions were reduced with the and the American Advisory Group with 128 establishment of the U.S. Army Medical positions was assigned to Saigon in 1950, the Command, Vietnam (Provisional). Army Surgeon General did not establish a hospital in Vietnam until 1962 (the Eighth The 68th Medical Group, operational on 18 Field Hospital at Nha Trang) to support March 1966, was located in Long Binh and American personnel in country. Between 1964 supported the medical mission in the III and IV and 1969 the number of American military combat tactical zones (CTZs). The 55th personnel in Vietnam increased from 23,000 Medical Group, operational in June 1966, to 550,000 as American combat units were supported the medical mission in the northern deployed to replace advisory personnel in II CTZ and was located at Qui Nhon. The 43d support of military operations. Medical Group, operational in November 1965, supported the medical mission for Between 1964 and 1973 the Army Surgeon southern II CTZ and was located at Nha Trang. General deployed 23 additional hospitals And, in October 1967, the 67th Medical established as fixed medical installations with Group, located at Da Nang, assumed area support missions. These included surgical, medical support responsibility for ICTZ. evacuation, and field hospitals and a 3,000 bed convalescent center, supported by a centralized blood bank, medical logistical support Army Physical Therapists installations, six medical laboratories, and The first member of the Army Medical multiple air ambulance ("Dust Off") units.
    [Show full text]
  • Incoming Freshman Packet
    4/C Welcome Packet Welcome to the Wolverine Battalion! July 2020 Table of Contents About the Navy and Marine Corps ........................................................................................................ 1 The United States Navy ........................................................................................................................ 1 The United States Marine Corps ........................................................................................................... 1 Introduction to NROTC ........................................................................................................................... 1 Mission Statement ................................................................................................................................ 1 Life as a Midshipman ............................................................................................................................ 1 University of Michigan NROTC Program .............................................................................................. 2 Drill Team ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Color Guard ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Intramural and Commander’s Cup Sports ........................................................................................ 3 Tri-Service/Birthday Ball ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]