DOCSLIB.ORG

The Tragedy of King Richard the Third. Edited by A. Hamilton Thompson

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Tragedy of King Richard the Third. Edited by A. Hamilton Thompson Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2008 with funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/3edtragedyofking00shakuoft OFC 1 5 iqo? THE ARDEN SHAKESPEARE W. GENERAL EDITOR: J. CRAIG 1899-1906: R. H. CASE, 1909 THE TRAGEDY OF KING RICHARD THE THIRD *^ ^*^ THE WORKS OF SHAKESPEARE THE TRAGEDY OF KING RICHARD THE THIRD EDITED BY A. HAMILTON THOMPSON . ? ^^ METHUEN AND CO. LTD. 86 ESSEX STREET: STRAND LONDON Thircf Edition First Published . August 22nd igoy Second Edition . August ^9^7 Third Edition . igi8 CONTENTS PAGB Introduction vii The Tragedy of King Richard the Third ... 7 Appendix I. 211 Appendix II 213 Appendix III. ......... 215 Appendix IV 220 " INTRODUCTION Six quarto editions of The Life and Death of Richard III. were published before the appearance of the folio of 1623. The title of the first quarto is : TRAGEDY OF King Richard THE | the third. Containing, His treacherous Plots against his | | brother Clarence: the pittiefull murther of his innocent | nephewes : his tyrannicall vsurpation : with the whole course | | of his detested life, and most deserued death. As it hath beene | lately the Right honourable the Chamber- Acted by | Lord | laine his seruants. [Prijnted by Valentine Sims, | At LONDON | for Wise, dwelling in Paules Chuch-yard \sic\ at Andrew | Signe of the Angell. the | 1597. I In the title of the second quarto (i 598), printed for Wise by Thomas Creede, the words " By William Shake-speare " occupy a new line after " seruants." The fourth, fifth, and sixth quartos also spell the author's name with a hyphen. The third quarto (1602), also printed by Creede, gives it as "Shakespeare," and adds, in a line above, the words " Newly augmented followed by a comma, which appear in the titles of the re- maining quartos. The fourth (1605) and the fifth (1612) were printed by Creede for " Mathew Lawe, dwelling in Paules Church-yard, at the Signe of the Foxe, neare S. Austin's Gate." The title of the fifth alters the title of the actors to " the Kings Maiesties seruants." As the licence by virtue of which the Lord Chamberlain's players became the King's bears date 19 May, 1603, this alteration probably should have appeared in the previous quarto. It occurs in the rest. The sixth quarto (1622) was printed for Law by Thomas Purfoot ; the seventh (1629) and eighth (1634) by John Norton. The title of the play in the first folio (1623) is: The viii INTRODUCTION Tragedy of Richard the Third : with the Landing Earle | of Richmond, and the Battell at Bosworth Field. pages | The are headed : The Life and Death of Richard the Third. The . play IS divided into acts and scenes. The fourth scene of Act III. includes scenes iv.-vii. as at present arranged. In Act IV. there are four scenes instead of five, scenes ii. and iii. beinsr treated as one. The second scene of Act v. embraces scenes ii.-v. of the modern editions. While the quarto editions present many internal variations, they form one text of the play which was derived originally from Q I, and in the remaining editions underwent steady de- generation. I is the basis of the text of 2 2 supplies Q Q ; Q a basis for Q 3, and transmits to it, as a general rule, its own characteristic errors and variations. The rest of the quartos, with one possible exception, follow the same plan of reprinting the most recent edition, so that, in each, the accumulation of printer's errors and alterations grows. The Cambridge editors hold that Q 5 was printed, not from Q 4, but from Q 3. For the present edition a minute examination has been made of Qq 1-4 and O 6; but for Q 5 the editor has relied upon the Cambridge collation. But his impression is that of Mr. P. A. Daniel, who thinks that the Cambridge collation "suggests that Q 5 was printed from a copy made up of Q 3 and Q 4," It is sufficient to refer to the first scene of the play, where, at lines 8, 14, 39, 48, 71, the debt ot Q 5 to the errors of O 4 is perfectly manifest. Very probably, as the play advanced, the printer realised that he had been guilty of heinous mistakes in Q 4, and, to avoid them, consulted the copy which in 1602 he had printed for another bookseller. He may have referred, as at I. i. 65, to Q 2, which he also had printed, to correct an error shared by Q 3 and Q 4. But the assumption that O 5 was not, in the first place, printed from Q 4, involves a number of un- designed coincidences in error between the two editions, which are quite improbable. A point of greater textual importance is the statement, in Q 3 and its successors, that the play had been " newly augmented.' The possible bearing of these words on its authorship will be discussed later. As a matter of fact, the text received no —; ; ; INTRODUCTION ix augmentation in the later quartos. Q 3 is indeed responsible for numerous variations from its predecessors : many of these, where they happen to agree with readings in the folios, have taken their place in both the established versions of the text and it has been a very general opinion that Q 3 was used as one of the authorities for the first folio. But, even if we allow the highest importance to these readings, they cannot be described as "augmentations." It seems unjust to conclude that the printer wished to attract fresh customers by false pretences. Nor have we any evidence that the author, having guaranteed some additions, failed to make good his promise, and that the title-page, printed in anticipation of the fulfilment of that promise, could not be cancelled. The most probable sense which the words can be made to bear is, that the O text in all its forms is an augmentation of some earlier play, and that these words should have appeared on the title-pages of Q i and Q 2, as well as of the later quartos. The F text, which is common to all the folios, leaves the general form of the play unaltered ; but the variations from the Q text which it contains are so many and important, that the question of its derivation and independent value becomes a most intricate problem. The discrepancies between F and Q (as it is convenient, for the sdke of brevity, to call the two versions of which F I and Q i are the original forms) may be summed up under the following general heads : (i) Lines or passages peculiar to F Lines or passages peculiar to (2) Q ; (3) Variations in lines, phrases, or single words, pointing to a possible revision of one version by the other (4) Variations in stage-directions. The problem which these points raise is concerned with the priority of the texts. Is F a revised and lengthened form ot form of F ? Or, supposing Q ; or is Q a revised and shortened them to be independent revisions of a common original, which should we prefer as the basis for a modem text of the play ? (i) There are in F about 196 lines of ordinary length, 15 short lines, and 17 half-lines or parts of lines, which are additions to the text as represented by O. In some cases the omission X INTRODUCTION of these passages from O can be accounted for quite simply, e.g. at I. iv. 36, 37, where the first printer of Q evidently has united the beginning of one line to the end of the next, by a careless, but quite intelligible mistake, which the printer of F has not made. But there are many passages which, if they existed in the original text, cannot have been overlooked accidentally by the original editor or printer of Q. At I. ii. 155-66, II. ii. 89- 100, III. vii. 144-53, IV. i. 97-103, IV. iv. 222-35, the F additions are of some length and importance; while at IV. iv. 291-345 the new matter amounts to 55 lines. It is obvious that, at the first appearance of Q in 1597, these passages either did not exist, or were omitted deliberately by the editor. In the first case, they must be later additions, forming part of a revision the result of in case, must have formed part which was F ; the second they of the original text, and, as such, establish a claim for F to represent the play as written by the author. (2) On the other hand, Q contains twenty-three ordinary and nineteen short lines which are not to be found in F. Of these, fourteen ordinary and four short lines occur in a single passage, viz. IV. ii, 98-115. When this is deducted from the rest, the matter peculiar to Q is seen to be inconsiderable. Either the editor of F omitted these lines, in some cases wil- fully, in others perhaps accidentally; or he had access to a text of the play which supplied the authority for their omission. That text, it is clear, either was revised by Q, or was itself a revision of Q. On the first supposition, these additions are easily explained : on the second, it is hard to see on what principle the reviser, while adding so much, cut out so little, and that little so unimportant ; while it is impossible to account for his omission of the one important passage in IV.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Recollections and Reflections, a Professional Autobiography
    ... • . .... (fcl fa Presented to the LIBRARY of the UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO from the estate of MARION WALKER RECOLLECTIONS AND REFLECTIONS. RECOLLECTIONS AND REFLECTIONS OF J. E. PLANCHE, (somerset herald). ^ |]rofcssiona( gaifobbcjrapbtr. " I ran it through, even from my boyish days, To the very moment that he bade me tell it." Othello, Act i., Scene 3. IN TWO VOLUMES. VOL. II. LONDON: TINSLEY BROTHERS, 18, CATHERINE STREET, STRAND. 1872. ..4^ rights reserved. LONDON BRADBURV, EVANS, AND CO., PRINTERS, WHITBFRIAR,-!. ——— CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. VAGK Another Mission to Paris—Production of " Le Domino Noir"— Mr. and Mrs. Charles Gore—Dinner at Lord Lyndhurst's Mons. Allou, Vice-President of the Society of Antiquaries of France—The Duke D'Istrie and his Collection of Armour Her Majesty's Coronation—" Royal Records "—Extension of Licence to the Olympic and Adelphi Theatres—" The Drama's Levee"—Trip to Calais with Madame Yestris and Charles Mathews previous to their departure for America—Visit to Tournehem—Sketching Excursion with Charles Mathews Marriage of Madame Vestris and Charles Mathews—They sail for New York—The Olympic Theatre opened under my Direc- tion—Farren and Mrs. Nisbett engaged—Unexpected return of Mr. and Mrs. Mathews—Re-appearance of the latter in " Blue Beard "— " Faint Heart never won Fair Lady "—"The Garrick Fever"—Charles Mathews takes Covent Garden Theatre CHAPTER II. Death of Haynes Bayly—Benefit at Drury Lane for his Widow and Family—Letters respecting it from Theodore Hook and Mrs. Charles Gore—Fortunate Results of the Benefit—Tho Honourable Edmund Byng—Annual Dinner established by him in aid of Thomas Dibdin—Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Ricardian Bulletin
    Ricardian Bulletin Contents Summer 2007 2 From the Chairman 3 Strategy Update 9 Society News and Notices 12 Media Retrospective 14 News and Reviews 17 The Man Himself: by Tony Goodman 20 Medieval Migration: by Peter W. Lee 22 A Proclamation Against Henry Tudor, 23 June 1485: by David Candlin 25 Hastings and the Meeting at St Paul’s: by Gordon Smith 27 Chedworth Parish Church: by Gwen & Brian Waters 29 A ‘Lost’ Medieval Document: by Lynda Pidgeon 30 Logge Notes and Queries: Helen Barker’s Miracles by Lesley Boatwright 33 Correspondence 36 Guidelines for Contributors to the Bulletin 37 The Barton Library 40 New Members 41 Australasian Convention 2007 44 Report on Society Events 52 Future Society Events 55 Branch and Group Contacts - Update 55 Branches and Groups 58 Obituaries and Recently Deceased Members 60 Calendar Contributions Contributions are welcomed from all members. All contributions should be sent to the Technical Editor, Lynda Pidgeon. Bulletin Press Dates 15 January for Spring issue; 15 April for Summer issue; 15 July for Autumn issue; 15 October for Winter issue. Articles should be sent well in advance. Bulletin & Ricardian Back Numbers Back issues of the The Ricardian and Bulletin are available from Judith Ridley. If you are interested in obtaining any back numbers, please contact Mrs Ridley to establish whether she holds the issue(s) in which you are interested. For contact details see back inside cover of the Bulletin The Ricardian Bulletin is produced by the Bulletin Editorial Committee Printed by St Edmundsbury Press. © Richard III Society, 2007 1 From the Chairman ime for another issue of the Bulletin, and, all being well, you should have the 2007 edition T of The Ricardian too.
    [Show full text]
  • Names Used by Garter Knights of the Plantagenet Period, up to 1485
    Names used by Garter Knights of the Plantagenet period, up to 1485 Full Name Suffix Title Birth-Death Plate No Plate Plate name Note No Ralph Basset Lord Basset of Drayton ca1335-1390 I 1 (none) Sir John de Grailly KG -1377 II 2 Le Capitow de la Bouch' Mons' Piers Sir Neel Loring KG -1386 III 3 Mons Neell Loryng p'm' fund Sir John Chandos KG -1369 IV 3 Mons John Chandos Primer Fondeux Sir Sanchet Dabrichecourt KG -c.1360 V 4 Mons Sanchete de Dabrichecourte Sir Walter Paveley KG -1375 VI 5 Mons' Wauter Paveley p'mer foudo' Sir William FitzWarin KG -1361 VII 7 Mons ffu fiz Baren Wrong forename William Latimer Lord Latimer ca1329-1381 VIII 8 Le S de Latemer Willm Guy de Bryan Lord Bryan <1319-1390 IX 9 Mons Gwy de Bryen Sir Thomas Banastre KG -1379 X 10 Mons' Thomas Banaster Sir Bermond Arnaud de Pressac KG -aft 1384 XI 11 Mon l' Sandich' de Traue "Sandich" = Governor Sir Thomas de Felton KG -1381 XII 12 Mons' Thomas de Felton John Devereux Lord Devereux -1393 XIII 13 Mons' John Deverose John Bourchier Lord Bourchier -1400 XIV 14 Le Syre de Bourgcher John John Beaumont Lord Beaumont ca1361-1396 XV 15 Moun s' de Deaumunde John Sir William Arundel KG -1400 XVI 16 Mons' Wyl liam Arondelle John Beaufort Marquis of Dorset ca1373-1410 XVII 17 Le Counte de Somersete Sir Simon Felbrigge KG -1442 XVIII 18 Mon S' Symond de ffelbrygg 'ff' is now written 'F' Sir Philip de la Vache KG -<1408 XIX 19 Mons' Philippe la Vache William de Willoughby Lord Willoughby ca1370-1409 XX 20 Le S' de Wylogby William Richard Grey Lord Grey of Codnor <1371-1418 XXI 21
    [Show full text]
  • Elizabeth Woodville and Margery Kempe, Female Agency in Late Medieval England
    ABSTRACT “She Should Have More if She Were Ruled and Guided by Them”: Elizabeth Woodville and Margery Kempe, Female Agency in Late Medieval England Laura Christine Oliver, M.A. Thesis Advisor: Beth Allison Barr, Ph.D. This thesis argues that while patriarchy was certainly present in England during the late medieval period, women of the middle and upper classes were able to exercise agency to a certain degree through using both the patriarchal bargain and an economy of makeshifts. While the methods used by women differed due to the resources available to them, the agency afforded women by the patriarchal bargain and economy of makeshifts was not limited to the aristocracy. Using Elizabeth Woodville and Margery Kempe as cases studies, this thesis examines how these women exercised at least a limited form of agency. Additionally, this thesis examines whether ordinary women have access to the same agency as elite women. Although both were exceptional women during this period, they still serve as ideal case studies because of the sources available about them and their status as role models among their contemporaries. “She Should Have More if She Were Ruled and Guided By Them”: Elizabeth Woodville and Margery Kempe, Female Agency in Late Medieval England by Laura Christine Oliver, B.A. A Thesis Approved by the Department of History ___________________________________ Jeffrey S. Hamilton, Ph.D., Chairperson Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Baylor University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Approved by the Thesis Committee ___________________________________ Beth Allison Barr, Ph.D., Chairperson ___________________________________ Julie A.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2006 Shakespeare Matters Page 1
    Summer 2006 Shakespeare Matters page 1 5:4 "Let me not to the marriage of true minds admit impediments..." Summer 2006 “Stars or Suns:” The Portrayal of the Earls of Oxford in Elizabethan Drama By Richard Desper, PhD n Act III Scene vii of King Henry V, the proud nobles of France, gathered in camp on the eve of the battle of Agincourt, I speculate in anticipation of victory, letting their thoughts and their words take flight in fancy. While viewing the bedraggled English army as doomed, they savor their expected victory on the morrow and vie with each other in proclaiming their own glory. The dauphin1 boasts of his horse as another Pegasus, leading to a few allusions of a bawdy nature, and then a curious exchange takes place between Lord Rambures and the Constable of France, Professor William Leahy explains plans for a Shakespeare Charles Delabreth: Authorship Studies Master’s Program at Brunel University. Photo by William Boyle. Ram. My Lord Constable, the armor that I saw in your tent to-night, are those stars or suns upon it? Con. Stars, my lord. Brunel University to Offer 2 (Henry V, III.vii.63-5) Masters in Authorship Studies Shakespeare scholars have remarked little on these particular speeches, by default implying that they are words spoken in hile Concordia University has encouraged study of the passing, having no particular meaning other than idle chatter. Shakespeare authorship issue for years, Brunel One can count at least a dozen treatises on the text of Henry V that W University in England now plans to offer a graduate have nothing at all to say about these two lines.3 Yet numerous program leading to an M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Third Part of King Henry the Sixth. Edited by H.C. Hart
    THE ARDEN SHAKESPEARE GENERAL : W. EDITOR J. CRAIG 1899-1906: R. H. CASE, 1909 THE THIRD PART OF KING HENRY THE SIXTH THE WORKS OF SHAKESPEARE THE THIRD PART OF KING HENRY THE SIXTH EDITED BY H. C. HART I METHUEN k Co., Ltd. 36 ESSEX STREET W.C. LONDON uuPR First Published in igio FEB 11955 ry r.F T 957820 CONTENTS PAGE Introduction vii The Third Part of King Henry the Sixth . i — INTRODUCTION [It is greatly to be regretted that owing to the lamented death of the Editor, the three Parts of Henry VI. had not the advan- tage of being printed under his own supervision. But his work has been preserved with all the fidelity permitted by its comparatively rough though otherwise complete condition. In preparing the plays for the press, I have confined my correc- tions to matters of fact, and where I differed from the Editor in matters of opinion, I did not feel justified in altering his words. While I have emended or ascertained the accuracy of nearly every quotation and reference, a very few remain which must be taken on his authority. In the third part I have had the great advantage of advice and help from the General Editor, Professor R. H. Case. C. K. Pooler] The text of j Henry VI. is from the Folio 1623. As was the case with Part II., it receives a few slight emendations from the Quarto (Q i, of which it is an expanded form) known as The True Tragedy (and forming the second part of The Whole Contention) which was first printed in 1595 with this title : The true tragedie of Richard Duke Yorke, and | of the death good King Henrie the Sixt, with the zuholc of | \ contentio?i hetweene the two Houses Lancaster and Yorke, \ | as it was sundrie times acted by the Right Honoura- ble | | the Earle of brooke his seruants.
    [Show full text]
  • CYMBELINE" in the Fllii^Slhi TI CENTURY
    "CYMBELINE" IN THE fllii^SLHi TI CENTURY Bennett Jackson Submitted in partial fulfilment for the de ree of uaster of Arts in the University of Birmingham. October 1971. University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. SYNOPSIS This thesis consists of an Introduction, followed by Part I (chapters 1-2) in which nineteenth- century criticism of the play is discussed, particular attention being paid to Helen Faucit's essay on Imogen, and its relationship to her playing of the role. In Part II the stags-history of Oymbcline in London is traced from 1785 to Irving's Lyceum production of 1896. Directions from promptbooks used by G-.P. Cooke, W.C. Macready, Helen Eaucit, and Samuel ±helps are transcribed and discussed, and in the last chapter the influence of Bernard Shaw on Ellen Terry's Imogen is considered in the light of their correspondence and the actress's rehearsal copies of the play. There are three appendices: a list of performances; transcriptions of two newspaper reviews (from 1843 and 1864) and one private diary (Gordon Crosse's notes on the Lyceum Gymbeline); and discussion of one of the promptbooks prepared for Charles Kean's projected production.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2020
    Simon Beattie Largely recent acquisitions To be exhibited at the ABAA Boston Virtual Book Fair 12–14 November 2020 From item 14, Niagara Paper Mills TAKING THE BISCUIT 01. ALBUM des célébrités contemporaines publié par Lefèvre- Utile Nantes [c.1901]. Oblong small folio (262 × 344 mm), pp. [22]; chromolithographed on thick dark grey paper, the leaves with ornate die-cut frames holding 56 chromolithographed cards; original embossed decorated boards, cloth spine. £950 A beautiful piece of Art Nouveau book production, in excellent condition. In 1901, the famous biscuit company Lefèvre-Utile began to issue, on its packets of biscuits, various chromolithographed cards featuring famous figures from the arts; each card (170 × 92 mm), embossed with silver or gold, bore a black-and-white photograph portrait of the celebrity—actor, artist, writer, etc.—along with a relevant colour image and a quotation from the celebrity themselves in praise of LU biscuits. The company also produced albums to house the cards. The present example has been completed (naturally, different albums might hold different cards, depending on what the owner inserted) with 48 cards of celebrities: actors Sarah Bernhardt, Eugénie Segond-Weber, Jane Hading, Gabrielle Réjane, Constant Coquelin (two different cards), Eugène Silvain, Léonie Yahne, Ève Lavallière, Suzanne Desprès, Félix Galipaux, Jules Leitner, and August Mévisto; singers Meyrianne Héglon, Marcelle Lender, Lina Landouzy, Lucienne Bréval, Berthe Soyer, Théodore Botrel, and Jeanne Raunay; dancers Carlotta Zambelli
    [Show full text]
  • University of Southampton Research Repository Eprints Soton
    University of Southampton Research Repository ePrints Soton Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination http://eprints.soton.ac.uk i UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF HUMANITIES School of History The Wydeviles 1066-1503 A Re-assessment by Lynda J. Pidgeon Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 15 December 2011 ii iii ABSTRACT Who were the Wydeviles? The family arrived with the Conqueror in 1066. As followers in the Conqueror’s army the Wydeviles rose through service with the Mowbray family. If we accept the definition given by Crouch and Turner for a brief period of time the Wydeviles qualified as barons in the twelfth century. This position was not maintained. By the thirteenth century the family had split into two distinct branches. The senior line settled in Yorkshire while the junior branch settled in Northamptonshire. The junior branch of the family gradually rose to prominence in the county through service as escheator, sheriff and knight of the shire.
    [Show full text]
  • A Royal Tragedy
    William Shakespeare's Richard III A Royal Tragedy Acts Three, Four, and Five Notes Provided by WISDOM Home Schooling's Online Socratic Dialogue Progra Dramatis Personae KING EDWARD IV – The leader of the Yorkists, who beat the Lancastrian king, Henry VI, and took his throne. During the final battle that beat the Lancastrians, King Edward was one of the three men who dishonourably stabbed Lady Anne’s husband when he was already down. Edward used to be a great warrior, but has now become sickly, and is more interested in entertainment and women than in feats of courage. Sons to the King: EDWARD, PRINCE OF WALES – About thirteen years old. King Edward IV and Queen Elizabeth’s older son, and heir to the throne of England. Wise beyond his years, and protective of his brother. RICHARD, DUKE OF YORK – About ten years old. Prince Edward’s younger brother, he is second in line to inherit the throne. Less serious than his brother, he is given to joking around and making fun of adults. Brothers to the King: GEORGE, DUKE OF CLARENCE – Clarence is a conflicted man. During the war between the Yorkists and the Lancastrians, he fought on whichever side seemed to be winning at the time. He was one of the three who stabbed Lady Anne’s husband. Despite his shifting alliances, Clarence nonetheless has a deep love for his wife and children. RICHARD, DUKE OF GLOUCESTER (pronounced “Gloss-ter”), who will one day become KING RICHARD III – Gloucester is a hunchback with a withered arm and a limp.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Norton Elizabeth 121093
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ The Blount Family in the long Sixteenth century Norton, Elizabeth Anna Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 26. Sep. 2021 The Blount Family in the Long Sixteenth Century Elizabeth Norton Doctor of Philosophy 2019 King’s College London 1 Abstract This thesis is an extended case study of the lives, attitudes, actions and concerns of one gentry family – the Blounts of the West Midlands –from the second half of the fifteenth century to the early years of the seventeenth, described as the long sixteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Directing Richard Iii
    DIRECTING RICHARD III ________________________________________________________________ A Thesis Submitted to The Temple University Graduate Board ________________________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF FINE ARTS IN DIRECTING ________________________________________________________________ By Brandon McShaffrey May, 2012 ________________________ Douglas Wager Thesis Advisor & Head of Directing Department of Theater ABSTRACT DIRECTOR OF RICHARD III Brandon McShaffrey Mentor: Douglas Wager Richard III is regarded as one of Shakespeare’s longest and most complex plays, with a complicated plot, and a character that is a Machiavellian villain. After a workshop of Act I as an MFA Directing Project, I was granted by Temple University to stage a full production of Richard III as my thesis. Approaching the play proved difficult for me due to my lack of experience with Shakespearean text. However, by analyzing Shakespeare’s text, and approaching the cut with the goal to make the story as clear as possible, I desired to create a production that embodied the idea of “now.” The designed team and I created a world that was a-historic pulling from classic and modern forms providing the necessary landscape for the play to occur. Through a series of seven chapters I explain my process from conception to production. I also evaluate my growth as a director during this artistic achievement. A Director’s Script, Actor’s Lexicon, Program Note, Design Renderings and Production Photos support my journey to opening night of Richard III. ii © 2012 Brandon McShaffrey iii For Peter Reynolds, Thank you. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ii DEDICATION iv LIST OF FIGURES vii CHAPTER 1. BEGINNINGS Introduction: Why “Now” 1 Shakespeare and Fear 4 The Workshop 7 2.
    [Show full text]