DOCSLIB.ORG

WC0749 Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
WC0749 Final Report UNDERSTANDING THE STATUS, AUTECOLOGY AND TAXONOMY OF UK BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN SPECIES: ARABLE BRYOPHYTES FINAL REPORT MARCH 2012 Simon Conyers Christine Conyers Ruth Laybourn Food and Environment Research Agency Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 4 2. Methods ..................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Field survey .......................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.1 Weissia squarrosa ............................................................................................. 5 2.1.2 Weissia multicapsularis ..................................................................................... 7 2.2 pH and texture of soil ........................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Genetic studies .................................................................................................................... 8 2.3.1 Sampling of Weissia species for genetic testing ............................................... 8 2.3.2 Molecular analysis ............................................................................................. 8 2.4 Spore germination studies ................................................................................................... 9 2.4.1 Germination from sporophyte collections .......................................................... 9 2.4.2 Germination from Soil Samples ....................................................................... 11 3. Results ..................................................................................................................................... 11 3.1 Field assessments ............................................................................................................. 11 3.1.1 Weissia squarrosa ........................................................................................... 11 3.1.2 Weissia multicapsularis ................................................................................... 17 3.2 Genetic studies .................................................................................................................. 17 3.2.1 nrITS ................................................................................................................ 17 3.2.2 trnL-trnF, rbcL, and trnH-psbA ........................................................................ 20 3.3 Spore germination studies ................................................................................................. 23 3.3.1 Effect of pH ...................................................................................................... 23 3.3.2 Effect of Fertilisers ........................................................................................... 23 3.3.3 Germination from Soil Samples ....................................................................... 28 4. Discussion ................................................................................................................................ 28 5. Further Research ..................................................................................................................... 33 Appendix 1. Personnel .................................................................................................................... 37 Appendix 2. Sequences of primers ................................................................................................ 39 Appendix 3. Bryophytes recorded during survey of over-wintered stubble fields in Lincolnshire and Gloucestershire .................................................................................................... 40 Appendix 4. Results of genetic studies with nrITS region ............................................................... 47 Appendix 5. Initial samples of Weissia for genetic testing: their location, collection date, verifier, GenBank® result using nrITS region and groupings from trnL-trnF and rbcL .................... 52 Appendix 6. Samples of Weissia from trnL-trnF analysis: their location, collection date, verifier and sample code ................................................................................................................. 55 Appendix 7. Location of soil sample, their number and results of germination and subsequent growth at 20oC and 60 r.h. ........................................................................................... 60 Appendix 8: Text for advisory leaflet for the conservation of arable mosses .................................. 61 Appendix 9. Dissemination of results .............................................................................................. 62 2 List of Tables Table 1 Results of field surveys of Staffordshire, Gloucestershire and Worcestershire ...... 13 Table 2 Results of field surveys of Surrey and Sussex ........................................................ 14 Table 3 Results of over-wintered stubble field surveys of Lincolnshire ............................... 15 Table 4 Results of over-wintered stubble field surveys of Gloucestershire ......................... 16 Table 5 Results of soil sampling at sites for W. multicapsularis .......................................... 17 Table 6 Species comparisons of nrITS sequences - Number of basepair differences (number of gaps in sequence) ..................................................................................................... 18 Table 7 Initial samples of Weissia for genetic testing: their location, GenBank® comparisons using nrITS results and the species groupings from trnL-trnF and rbcL sequences ...... 19 Table 8 Results of trnL-trnF sequence analysis for Weissia species: Number of basepair differences (number of gaps in sequence) .................................................................... 21 Table 9 Results of rbcL sequence analysis: Number of basepair differences ..................... 22 Table 10 Location of soil sample, their number and number of leafy growths produced ...... 27 Table 11 Example of the results of microsatellite analysis ................................................... 33 List of Figures Figure 1 Effect of pH on the germination of the spores of Weissia multicapsularis: average number (with SEMs) of protonemata and leafy growths produced after 11 month's growth at 20oC ............................................................................................................... 24 Figure 2 Effect of pH on the germination of the spores of Weissia squarrosa: average number (with SEMs) of protonemata and leafy growths produced after 11 month's growth at 20oC ............................................................................................................... 24 Figure 3 Effect of Ammonium nitrate on the germination of the spores of Weissia multicapsularis: average number (with SEMs) of protonemata and leafy growths produced after 8 month's growth at 20oC ...................................................................... 25 Figure 4 Effect of Ammonium nitrate on the germination of the spores of Weissia squarrosa: average number (with SEMs) of protonemata and leafy growths produced after 8 month's growth at 20oC .................................................................................................. 25 Figure 5 Effect of Sodium phosphate on the germination of the spores of Weissia multicapsularis: average number (with SEMs) of leafy growths produced after 8 month's growth at 20oC ............................................................................................................... 26 Figure 6 Effect of Sodium phosphate on the germination of the spores of Weissia squarrosa: average number (with SEMs) of protonemata and leafy growths produced after 8 month's growth at 20oC .................................................................................................. 26 3 1. INTRODUCTION The UK Biodiversity Action Plan (UK BAP), published in 1994, described the UK’s biological resources and presented a detailed plan for the protection and sustainable use of these resources. It contained objectives for conserving and enhancing species and habitats as well as promoting public awareness. In 2007 as part of the BAP review process, the UK Biodiversity Reporting and Information Group (BRIG) updated the UK BAP species and habitats, highlighting the priorities for conservation action. A UK list of priority species and habitats was published together with ‘signposts’ and subsequent actions for each of the 1150 UK BAP species (Peak Ecology Ltd, 2009). Bryophytes were an important part of this conservation list. They are also an important constituent of arable plant communities and at least 17 liverworts and hornworts and 73 mosses have been recorded on arable land (Porley, 2000). Arable land is a transient habitat subject to regular disturbance due to cultivation. Arable bryophytes have compressed life cycles that are adapted to growth within this ephemeral environment. Some species also produce vegetative propagules such as tubers, bulbils or gemmae, which also allow bryophytes to persist through stressful periods such as seasonal drought and ploughing (Porley, 2008). Two species of arable mosses, Weissia squarrosa (Nees & Hornsch.) Mull.Hal. (Spreading-leaved beardless-moss)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Check- and Red List of Bryophytes of the Czech Republic (2003)
    Preslia, Praha, 75: 193–222, 2003 193 Check- and Red List of bryophytes of the Czech Republic (2003) Seznam a Červený seznam mechorostů České republiky (2003) Jan K u č e r a 1 and Jiří Vá ň a 2 1University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Branišovská 31, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected]; 2Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Botany, Benátská 2, CZ-128 01 Prague, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected] Kučera J. & Váňa J. (2003): Check- and Red List of bryophytes of the Czech Republic (2003). – Preslia, Praha, 75: 193–222. The second version of the checklist and Red List of bryophytes of the Czech Republic is provided. Generally accepted infraspecific taxa have been incorporated into the checklist for the first time. With respect to the Red List, IUCN criteria version 3.1 has been adopted for evaluation of taxa, and the criteria used for listing in the respective categories are listed under each red-listed taxon. Taxa without recent localities and those where extinction has not been proven are listed as a subset of DD taxa. Little known and rare non-threatened taxa with incomplete knowledge of distribution which are worthy of further investigation are listed on the so-called attention list. In total, 849 species plus 5 subspecies and 19 varieties have been accepted. 23 other historically reported species and one va- riety were evaluated as doubtful with respect to unproven but possible occurrence in the territory, and 6 other species with proven occurrence require taxonomic clarification.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revised Red List of Bryophytes in Britain
    ConservationNews Revised Red List distinguished from Extinct. This Red List uses Extinct in the Wild (EW) – a taxon is Extinct version 3.1 of the categories and criteria (IUCN, in the Wild when it is known to survive only in A revised Red List of 2001), along with guidelines produced to assist cultivation or as a naturalized population well with their interpretation and use (IUCN, 2006, outside the past range. There are no taxa in this 2008), further guidelines for using the system category in the British bryophyte flora. bryophytes in Britain at a regional level (IUCN, 2003), and specific Regionally Extinct (RE) – a taxon is regarded guidelines for applying the system to bryophytes as Regionally Extinct in Britain if there are no (Hallingbäck et al., 1995). post-1979 records and all known localities have Conservation OfficerNick Hodgetts presents the latest revised Red List for How these categories and criteria have been been visited and surveyed without success, or interpreted and applied to the British bryophyte if colonies recorded post-1979 are known to bryophytes in Britain. Dumortiera hirsuta in north Cornwall. Ian Atherton flora is summarized below, but anyone interested have disappeared. It should be appreciated that in looking into them in more depth should regional ‘extinction’ for bryophytes is sometimes he first published Red List of et al. (2001) and Preston (2010), varieties and consult the original IUCN documents, which less final than for other, more conspicuous bryophytes in Britain was produced subspecies have been disregarded. are available on the IUCN website (www. organisms. This may be because bryophytes are in 2001 as part of a Red Data Book 1980 has been chosen as the cut-off year to iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/categories- easily overlooked, or because their very efficient for bryophytes (Church et al., 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Species Dossier
    Weissia rostellata (Brid) Lindb. Beaked Beardless-moss POTTIACEAE SYN.: Astomum rostellatum (Brid.) Bruch & Schimp., Hymenostomum rostellatum (Brid.) Schimp. Status Bryophyte Red Data Book - Lower Risk (Near-threatened) (2001) Status in Europe: Rare BAP Priority Species Natural England Species Recovery Lead Partner: Plantlife International UK Biodiversity Action Plan This is the current BAP target following the 2001 Targets Review: T1 - Maintain population size at all extant sites. Progress on targets as reported in the UKBAP 2002 reporting round can be viewed by selecting this species and logging in as a guest on the following web page: http://www.ukbap.org.uk/ The full Action Plan for Weissia rostellata can be viewed on the following web page: http://www.ukbap.org.uk/UKPlans.aspx?ID=631 Contents 1 Morphology, Identification, Taxonomy & Genetics................................................2 1.1 Morphology & Identification ........................................................................2 1.2 Taxonomic Considerations..........................................................................4 1.3 Genetic Implications ..................................................................................4 2 Distribution & Current Status ...........................................................................4 2.1 World ......................................................................................................4 2.2 Europe ....................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Family Pottiaceae (Bryopsida) in Central India with Special Reference to Pachmarhi Biosphere Reserve (PBR)
    Lindbergia 34: 30–39, 2011 ISSN 0105-0761 Accepted 11 January 2011 An overview of family Pottiaceae (Bryopsida) in central India with special reference to Pachmarhi Biosphere Reserve (PBR) Virendra Nath, A. K. Asthana and Reesa Gupta V. Nath, A. K. Asthana ([email protected]) and R. Gupta, Bryology Laboratory, National Botanical Research Inst., 226 001 Lucknow, India. The family Pottiaceae is one of the dominant acrocarpous moss family of India, with approximately 26 genera and 130 species being encountered. The present work intends to take up distribution of the members of the family in the central Indian region with nearly 22 taxa being reported earlier. Achanakmar – Amarkantak Biosphere Reserve, Bhimbetka world heritage site, Gujarat, Mt. Abu and Pachmarhi Biosphere Reserve (PBR) are some important hotspots of bryophyte vegetation in central India. Among these, PBR listed under UNESCO’s Man and Biosphere (MAB) Programme is an important site of bryophyte vegetation. Mosses of PBR however have not been studied until now. Here we assess the status of family Pottiaceae in central Indian zone along with providing an illustrated account of eight species encountered from PBR. Among these, Hyophila spathulata (Harv.) Jaeg. and Oxystegus teneuirostre (Hook. et Tayl.) A.J.E. Smith are new additions to central India, while Semibarbula ranuii Gangulee and Weissia edentula Mitt. are being reported from PBR for the first time. India is well known for its floristic diversity of various plant betka world heritage site (Nath and Bansal 2009), 11 taxa groups. Indian researchers have broadly divided India into from Mt. Abu (Chaudhary and Deora 2001) and eight eight bryo-geographical regions (Singh 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Dry Grassland Communities of Shallow, Skeletal Soils
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Tuexenia - Mitteilungen der Floristisch- soziologischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft Jahr/Year: 2006 Band/Volume: NS_26 Autor(en)/Author(s): Dengler Jürgen, Löbel Swantje, Boch Steffen Artikel/Article: Dry grassland communities of shallow, skeletal soils (Sedo-Scleranthenea) in northern Europe 159-190 ©Floristisch-soziologische Arbeitsgemeinschft; www.tuexenia.de; download unter www.zobodat.at Tuexenia 2 6:15 9-190 . Göttingen 2006. Dry grassland communities of shallow, skeletal soils (Sedo-Scleranthenea) in northern Europe -Jürgen Dengler, Swantje Löbel and Steffen Boch - Abstract We studied the dry grasslands of shallow, skeletal soils ( Sedo-Scleranthenea , Koelerio-Corynephore- tea) in northern Europe, based on a combination of new relevés from southern Oland (Sweden, n = 182) and Saaremaa (Estonia, n = 73) as well as a comprehensive evaluation of literature data, of which 65 suit­ able relevés were directly included in our analyses. Apart from a few vague indications of acidophytic Sedo-Scleranthenea communities (order Sedo-Scleranthetalia), all data refer to basiphytic communities (.Alysso-Sedetalia ); our analyses are thus focussed on the latter. The Nordic Alysso-Sedetalia communi­ ties proved to be quite different from their temperate counterparts and thus are included in a separate alliance, Tortello tortuosae-Sedion albi, which forms the northern counterpart to the central European Alysso-Sedion. Within the northern alliance, we distinguish two suballiances. The more widespread cen­ tral suballiance Tortello tortuosae-Sedenion albi inhabits different types of base-rich substrata in both natural and anthropogenic sites, and is comprised of the Cladonio symphicarpiae-Sedetum albi and the Ditricho flexicaulis-Sedetum acris.
    [Show full text]
  • Bryophyte Flora of the Czech Republic: Updated Checklist and Red List and a Brief Analysis
    Preslia 84: 813–850, 2012 813 Bryophyte flora of the Czech Republic: updated checklist and Red List and a brief analysis Bryoflóra České republiky: aktualizace seznamu a červeného seznamu a stručná analýza Dedicated to the centenary of the Czech Botanical Society (1912–2012) Jan K u č e r a1, Jiří Vá ň a2 & Zbyněk H r a d í l e k3 1University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Science, Branišovská 31, CZ–370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected]; 2Charles University Prague, Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Benátská 2, CZ–128 01 Prague 2, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected]; 3Palacký University Olomouc, Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Šlechtitelů 11, CZ-783 71 Olomouc-Holice, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected]. Kučera J., Váňa J. & Hradílek Z. (2012): Bryophyte flora of the Czech Republic: updated checklist and Red List and a brief analysis. – Preslia 84: 813–850. The bryoflora of the Czech Republic is analysed using an updated version of the checklist that includes recent taxonomic and nomenclatural changes. In addition, the baseline data was com- pletely revised using the IUCN 3.1 criteria. The main list includes 863 species of bryophytes (4 hornworts, 207 liverworts and 652 mosses) with 5 additional subspecies and 23 generally recog- nized varieties; 9 additional species are listed as of doubtful taxonomic status and 17 other species are evaluated as of uncertain occurrence. Of the 892 taxa evaluated, 46% qualified for inclusion in Red List categories (40 taxa in category RE, 70 in CR, 88 in EN, 93 in VU, 66 in LR-nt, 24 in DD-va and 30 in DD), while 54% are considered Least Concern (LC).
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Records Centre Report 1999-2004
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by NERC Open Research Archive JNCC Report No. 370 BIOLOGICAL RECORDS CENTRE REPORT 1999-2004 This report should be cited as: Hill, M.O., Arnold, H.R., Broad, G.R., Burton, V.J., James, T.J., McLean, I.F.G., Preston, C.D., Rowland, F. & Roy, D.B. (2005) Biological Records Centre: Report 1999-2004 JNCC Report, No. 370 © JNCC, Peterborough 2005 Nominated Officers: Biological Records Centre Joint Nature Conservation Committee Dr Mark Hill Dr Ian McLean Biological Records Centre Joint Nature Conservation Committee CEH Monks Wood Monkstone House Abbots Ripton City Road Huntingdon PE28 2LS Peterborough PE1 1JY For further information please contact: Dr Ian McLean Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House, City Road Peterborough PE1 1JY ISSN 0963-8091 (Online) TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ........................................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................3 PROGRAMME 1: DEVELOPING CAPACITY OF RECORDING SCHEMES AND VOLUNTEERS ....4 Developing National Schemes and Societies....................................................................................................4 PROGRAMME 2: DATA
    [Show full text]
  • Name of the Manuscript
    Available online: December 17, 2018 Commun.Fac.Sci.Univ.Ank.Series C Volume 27, Number 2, Pages 185-194 (2018) DOI: 10.1501/commuc_0000000214 ISSN 1303-6025 E-ISSN 2651-3749 http://communications.science.ankara.edu.tr/index.php?series=C SPORE MORPHOLOGY OF SOME WEISSIA SPECIES (POTTIACEAE) FROM TURKEY MERVE CAN GOZCU, GURAY UYAR AND TALIP CETER Abstract. In this study, spore morphology of Weissia controversa Hedw., W. condensa (Voit) Lindb. and W. brachycarpa (Nees & Hornsch.) Jur. were examined by the light microscopy (LM) and the scanning electron microscopy (SEM). All spores are small, the length of the polar axis (P) is between 13.39 µm and 15.0 µm, equatorial diameter (E) is between 17.56 µm and 18.38 µm. The smallest spores observed in W. condensa and the biggest spores in W. controversa. The shapes of all spores were determined as suboblate. Ornamentations are differing on leptoma and on distal pole. Baculate, baculate-clavate, pilate-baculate and ecinate ornamentation types were observed on the distal pole. The ornamentations are diluted on the leptoma. In addition to spore morphology, capsule structures were examined and photographed with SEM. As a result, the spore size, shapes, ornamentation types and the capsule structures show some differences among these species and these differences can be used as a distinctive character in the identification of the species. 1. Introduction The Pottiaceae Hampe is the most common and large moss family, with around 1.400 species in 83 genera. This family members show a major variety of morphological, physiological and genecological adaptations [1].
    [Show full text]
  • О Систематическом Положении Рода Discelium (Bryophyta) Michael S
    Arctoa (2016) 25: 278–284 doi: 10.15298/arctoa.25.21 ON THE SYSTEMATIC POSITION OF DISCELIUM (BRYOPHYTA) О СИСТЕМАТИЧЕСКОМ ПОЛОЖЕНИИ РОДА DISCELIUM (BRYOPHYTA) MICHAEL S. IGNATOV1,2, VLADIMIR E. FEDOSOV1, ALINA V. F EDOROVA3 & ELENA A. IGNATOVA1 МИХАИЛ С. ИГНАТОВ1,2, ВЛАДИМИР Э. ФЕДОСОВ1, АЛИНА В. ФЕДОРОВА3, ЕЛЕНА А. ИГНАТОВА1 Abstract Results of molecular phylogenetic analysis support the position of the genus Discelium in the group of diplolepideous opposite mosses, Funariidae; however, its affinity is stronger with Encalyptales than with Funariales, where it is currently placed. A number of neglected morphological characters also indicate that Discelium is related to Funariales no closer than to Encalyptales, and thus new order Disceliales is proposed. Within the Encalyptaceae a case of strong sporophyte reduction is revealed. Bryobartramia appeared to be nested in Encalypta sect. Rhabdotheca, thus this genus is synonymized with Encalypta. Резюме Молекулярно-филогенетический анализ подтвердил положение рода Discelium в группе диплолепидных мхов с перистомом с супротивным расположением его элементов, или подклассе Funariidae, однако указал на родство с порядком Encalyptales, а не с Funariales, в который его обычно относили. Ряд редко учитываемых морфологических признаков также свидетельствует в пользу лишь отдаленного родства с Funariaceae. Предложено выделение Discelium в отдельный порядок Disceliales. В Encalyptaceae выявлен случай сильной редукции спорофита. Выявлено положение Bryobartramia в пределах рода Encalypta, в котором он имеет близкое родство с терминальными группами видов с гетерополярными спорами. Таким образом, Bryobartramia отнесена в синонимы к роду Encalypta. KEYWORDS: mosses, taxonomy, molecular phylogenetics, new order INTRODUCTION observation revealed the peristomial formula of Discelium The genus Discelium Brid. represents a small moss is 4:2(–4):4 with opposite position of exostome and with a strongly reduced gametophore.
    [Show full text]
  • Buxbaumiella 61: 1-67
    26 Buxbaumiella 73 (2005) Veranderingen in de Standaardlijst van de Nederlandse blad-, lever- en hauwmossen (2005) H.N. Siebel1, H.J. During2 & H.M.H. van Melick3 1Ericastraat 22, 1214EL Hilversum ([email protected]); 2Vijverlaan 14, 3971 HK Driebergen; 3Merellaan 13, 5552 BZ Valkenswaard Summary: Changes in the Checklist of Dutch mosses, liverworts & hornworts An update is given of the checklist of the Dutch bryophyte flora. Five species were recently found or recognized for the first time in the Netherlands. Two species and five varieties were recognized again and several names were adjusted to recent taxonomical changes. The updated version of the checklist can be found on the website of the Dutch Bryological and Lichenological Society (www.blwg.nl). Inleiding In deze publikatie worden aanvullingen op en veranderingen in de Standaardlijst van de Nederlandse blad-, lever- en hauwmossen (Dirkse et al. 1999) gegeven. Aanleiding hiervoor is dat er sinds de laatste aanvullingen (Siebel et al. 2003) al weer een aantal soorten nieuw voor Nederland is gevonden en dat in het kader van het werk aan de uitgave van de Beknopte Mosflora van Nederland en België (Siebel & During 2006) de taxonomische literatuur van de afgelopen jaren is bestudeerd. Hoewel hier juist vanwege de stabiliteit in naamgeving de nodige terughoudendheid in wordt betracht, zijn er een aantal recente naam- wijzigingen uit deze literatuur overgenomen die voldoende onderbouwd zijn door morfologisch en moleculair genetisch onderzoek. De nieuwe standaardlijst is in overeenstemming met de naamgeving in de Beknopte Mosflora van Nederland en België. Wijzigingen en toelichtingen Hieronder worden per achterliggende reden alle aanvullingen en wijzi- gingen in wetenschappelijke namen, Nederlandstalige namen, cijfer- coden en lettercoden in de standaardlijst gegeven.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 12 Bryophytes
    Guidelines for the Selection of Biological SSSIs Part 2: Detailed Guidelines for Habitats and Species Groups Chapter 12 Bryophytes Authors Sam Bosanquet, David Genney and Jonathan Cox To view other Part 2 chapters and Part 1 of the SSSI Selection Guidelines visit: http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-2303 Cite as: Bosanquet, S.D.S., Genney, D.R. and Cox, J.H.S. 2018. Guidelines for the Selection of Biological SSSIs. Part 2: Detailed Guidelines for Habitats and Species Groups. Chapter 12 Bryophytes. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough. © Joint Nature Conservation Committee 2018 Guidelines for the Selection of Biological SSSIs - Part 2: Chapter 12 Bryophytes (2018 revision, v1.0) Cover note This chapter updates and, along with Chapter 13 Lichens and Chapter 14 Non-lichenised fungi, replaces the previous Non-vascular plants SSSI Selection Guidelines chapter (Nature Conservancy Council 1992). It was prepared by Sam Bosanquet (Natural Resources Wales), Jonathan Cox (Natural England) and David Genney (Scottish Natural Heritage), and provides detailed guidance for use in selecting bryophyte sites throughout Great Britain to recommend for notification as SSSIs. It should be used in conjunction with Part 1 of the SSSI Selection Guidelines, as published in 2013 (Bainbridge et al 2013), which detail the overarching rationale, operational approach and criteria for selection of SSSIs. The main changes from the previous version of the chapter are: • only bryophytes (mosses, liverworts and hornworts) are considered; • assemblage scoring is based on ecologically coherent assemblages; • scores for Nationally Scarce species are constant across Britain; • two Atlantic assemblages have scoring systems that include non-Scarce Hyperoceanic species; • a criterion for selecting the largest population of Red List species in each of England, Scotland and Wales is included; and • discontinuation of the Schedule 8 species selection criterion.
    [Show full text]
  • Weissia Squarrosa in Britain: a Re­ Evaluation of Its Identification and Ecology in the Light of Recent Records
    Field Bryology number 86 Weissia squarrosa in Britain: a re­ evaluation of its identification and ecology in the light of recent records 1 S.D.S. Bosanquet & C.D. Preston2 1 Dingestow Court, Monmouth) Monmouthshire) NP25 4 DY 2 CEH Monks Wo o� Abbots Ripton) Huntingdon) Cambridgeshire) PE28 2LS Background suggested that it was W. rostellata, but it was subsequently re-identified as W. squarrosa. It According to Church et al. (1991), Weissia occupied 1.7 ha of an 8 ha set-aside field just squarrosa is one of the most threatened members north of Caewern Wood, Dingestow. In the of its genus, assessed by IUCN criteria as following winter the Weissia was still abundant, Endangered in Britain. It is also a European and so SDSB invited CDP, D.T. Holyoak and endemic and is listed as rare in Europe (ECCB, J.D. Sleath to see the field. They documented 1995). However, despite its rarity it was only the colony with a series of digital photographs, included on the long list of the UK Biodiversity took soil samples and recorded ten quadrats to Action Plan (BAP) and treated in a Species describe the vegetation. Statement (UK Biodiversity Group, 1999) because it had not been recorded in the UK for A few months later, W. squarrosa was found in more than ten years and so survey was two fields surveyed for the Survey of the considered to be the only possible action (R.D. Bryophytes of Arable Land (SBAL) project Porley, pets. comm.). This contrasts with W. during the 2004 BBS spring meeting in rostellata, which is a BAP priority species even Worcestershire (v.-c.
    [Show full text]