DOCSLIB.ORG

Characterization of the Groundwater Storage Systems of South-Central Chile: an Approach Based on Recession Flow Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Characterization of the Groundwater Storage Systems of South-Central Chile: an Approach Based on Recession Flow Analysis water Article Characterization of the Groundwater Storage Systems of South-Central Chile: An Approach Based on Recession Flow Analysis Víctor Parra 1,2,*, José Luis Arumí 1,2 , Enrique Muñoz 3,4 and Jerónimo Paredes 1 1 Department of Water Resources, Universidad de Concepción, Chillán 3812120, Chile; [email protected] (J.L.A.); [email protected] (J.P.) 2 Centro Fondap CRHIAM, Concepción 4070411, Chile 3 Department of Civil Engineering, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción 4090541, Chile; [email protected] 4 Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Ambientes Sustentables CIBAS, Concepción 4090541, Chile * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +56-41-234-5355 Received: 16 September 2019; Accepted: 1 November 2019; Published: 7 November 2019 Abstract: Groundwater storage and discharge are important processes that have not yet been sufficiently studied in some parts of Chile. Additionally, in watersheds without snow cover or glaciers, groundwater storage and release are the main sources of minimum flow generation; therefore, improvements are required to characterize this process. This study aimed to use recession flow analysis to link groundwater storage depletion to the predominant geological characteristics of each watershed in order to improve our understanding of the groundwater storage-release process in 24 watersheds in south-central Chile. The results allowed different groundwater storage behaviors associated with different geological characteristics to be identified, making recession flow analysis a valuable tool for improving the representation and conceptualization of this process in order to advance toward better minimum flow predictions. Keywords: geology; recession flow analysis; groundwater storage 1. Introduction Mountain watersheds tend to be dominated by snowmelt or occasionally glacier melt, which are often the main sources of water in adjacent low-lying areas [1]. However, in watersheds without snow cover or glaciers, groundwater storage and release make up the main source of minimum flow (or baseflow) generation, making it an important process in the hydrological system of a watershed [2], and its contribution to river streamflows proves fundamental to meeting the water demands of various economic activities in periods of water scarcity. Therefore, improvements are necessary to characterize the low-flow behavior of rivers for the joint management of water use, water quality management, and ecosystem services [3]. The descending flow of rivers in rainless periods is known as the recession flow. These flows are directly related to the groundwater storage of the watershed; therefore, the groundwater storage and discharge process can be studied through flow measurements during the recession period [4]. Brutsaert and Nieber [5], using recession-period flow data, proposed an analysis method (the recession flow analysis method) to indirectly estimate watershed-scale hydraulic parameters [6] based on the Boussinesq equation, which describes the drainage process of an ideal aquifer. Put simply, the analysis consists of plotting the average recession flow discharge (Q) as a function of the rate of change in discharge (dQ/dt) in log-log space. This allows different recession events to be identified, Water 2019, 11, 2324; doi:10.3390/w11112324 www.mdpi.com/journal/water Water 2019, 11, 2324 2 of 14 producing a data cloud that permits different recession regimes to be identified in order to indirectly obtain the hydraulic parameters of the aquifer [6]. However, recent literature has shown that the method can be applied more broadly [7]. For example, Brutsaert [8] showed that flow records can be used to characterize groundwater storage and release processes in a watershed. The author developed a methodology to quantify the variability of long-term groundwater storage using recession flows. Kirchner [9], using the recession flow method, developed a methodology to quantify dynamic groundwater storage, with which the watershed can be represented as a simple dynamic system. The methodology described by the author allows estimates of the dynamic storage of the basin and recession times to be obtained. Ajami et al. [10] used recession flow analysis in the Sabino Creek catchment (United States), which has a fractured rock influence, to derive groundwater storage-release relationships in order to estimate changes in storage to quantify mountain block recharge (MBR) rates. Shaw and Riha [7] applied the recession analysis approach of [5] considering individual events in seven basins in the United States. The authors suggest that individual analysis of recession events can be a valuable tool to obtain information on watershed-scale hydrological processes and can justify alternatives to current low-flow models. According to the literature cited, recession flow data contain information on the dynamic behavior of groundwater storage and release [8–10]; thus, these data can represent the rate at which the groundwater storage is depleting (groundwater storage behaviors) and in turn different storage structures. Therefore, the behavior of recession flow data can be associated with the predominant geological characteristics of watersheds to provide a better understanding of hydrological processes in order to improve the structure of hydrological models. There are various mountain watersheds in Chile with fractured geology (e.g., the watershed system associated with the Chillán volcanic complex), [11–13], as well as mountain watersheds with mixed geology [14]. In addition, due to the formation of the country, the Central Valley presents a higher proportion of geological sequences of sedimentary origin [14]; therefore, the watersheds located in this area and mountain watersheds should present different storage behaviors. Thus, the objective of this study is to identify and characterize the behavior of groundwater storage systems in watersheds with different geological characteristics using recession flow analysis to improve our understanding of the groundwater storage-release process. 2. Methods To study the groundwater storage behavior in the watersheds the recession flow analysis method described in Brutsaert and Nieber [5] was used. Then, to complement the analysis the identified behaviors were linked to the geological characteristics of each watershed. 2.1. Study Area and Hydrometeorological Data The study area comprises of 24 watersheds located in south-central Chile between latitudes 35◦ and 41◦ S (Figure1), 16 of which are located in the Andes Mountains (AM), 6 in the Central Valley (CV), and 2 in the Coastal Range (CR). The watershed areas range between 123 and 5688 km2 (see Table1). Watersheds without anthropogenic alterations or with minimal alterations were selected in order to discard anthropogenic effects on the analysis. In general, the selected watersheds in the central zone present a Mediterranean climate (latitudes ~35–36◦ S), while those farther south (latitudes ~37–41◦ S) present a wet climate [15]. In addition, they present a hydrological regime dominated by precipitation in winter and high precipitation variability, with annual averages from 700 to 4000 mm [13,15,16]. Table1 provides a summary of the geological formations present in each watershed. In accord with the classification carried out by SERNAGEOMIN [14], the geological formations are classified as sedimentary sequences (SS), volcano-sedimentary sequences (SVS), volcanic sequences (VS) and, to a lesser extent, formations associated with intrusive (IF) and metamorphic rocks (MF). These formations consist mainly of alluvial, colluvial, and mass removal deposits, moraine, fluvioglacial, and glaciolacustrine deposits (SS), basaltic to dacitic lavas, epiclastic and pyroclastic rocks (SVS), pyroclastic deposits, mainly rhyolitic, associated Water 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 15 Water 2019, 11, 2324 3 of 14 tonalites and hornblende (IF), and metaturbidites with low-grade metamorphism, metapelites. and withmetabasites caldera collapse,(MF). basaltic to rhyolitic lavas (SV), granodiorites, diorites, tonalites and hornblende (IF), andOf the metaturbidites 24 studied watershed with low-grades, 16 are metamorphism, on the western metapelites. slope of the and Andes metabasites at elevations (MF). above 200 m.a.s.lOf (yellow the 24 studied circles in watersheds, Figure 1). Most 16 are of on these the watershed western slopes are of dominated the Andes by at formations elevations aboveassociated 200 m.a.s.lwith volcanic (yellow circles and involcano Figure-1sedimentary). Most of these sequences watersheds; however are dominated, a few by (6 formations watersheds) associated present with a volcanicsignificant and portion volcano-sedimentary of intrusive and sequences; metamorphic however, formations a few (6 watersheds)[11–14]. In addition, present a due significant to the tectonic portion ofuplift intrusive of the and Andes, metamorphic most of formationsthe watersheds [11–14 present]. In addition, a rugged due topography to the tectonic, with uplift steep of the slopes Andes, of mostapproximately of the watersheds 20° (Table present 1). The a ruggedwatershed topography,s located in with the steepCentral slopes Vall ofey approximately(6 watersheds, 20red◦ (Tabletriangles1). Thein Figure watersheds 1) are locatedlocated in between the Central 80 and Valley 120(6 m.a.s.l. watersheds, and present red triangles a geological in Figure configuration1) are located dominated between 80by and sedimentary 120 m.a.s.l. formations. and present Despite a geological the dominance configuration of dominatedformations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Estimating Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) Regional and Local Suitability: a Case Study in Washington State, USA
    hydrology Case Report Estimating Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) Regional and Local Suitability: A Case Study in Washington State, USA Maria T. Gibson 1,* ID , Michael E. Campana 2 and Dave Nazy 3 1 Water Resources Graduate Program, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97330, USA 2 Hydrogeology and Water Resources, College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97330, USA; [email protected] 3 EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, INC., Olympia, WA 98508, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-541-214-5599 Received: 21 December 2017; Accepted: 5 January 2018; Published: 12 January 2018 Abstract: Developing aquifers as underground water supply reservoirs is an advantageous approach applicable to meeting water management objectives. Aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) is a direct injection and subsequent withdrawal technology that is used to increase water supply storage through injection wells. Due to site-specific hydrogeological quantification and evaluation to assess ASR suitability, limited methods have been developed to identify suitability on regional scales that are also applicable at local scales. This paper presents an ASR site scoring system developed to qualitatively assess regional and local suitability of ASR using 9 scored metrics to determine total percent of ASR suitability, partitioned into hydrogeologic properties, operational considerations, and regulatory influences. The development and application of a qualitative water well suitability method was used to assess the potential groundwater response to injection, estimate suitability based on predesignated injection rates, and provide cumulative approximation of statewide and local storage prospects. The two methods allowed for rapid assessment of ASR suitability and its applicability to regional and local water management objectives at over 280 locations within 62 watersheds in Washington, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimation of the Base Flow Recession Constant Under Human Interference Brian F
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, VOL. 49, 7366–7379, doi:10.1002/wrcr.20532, 2013 Estimation of the base flow recession constant under human interference Brian F. Thomas,1 Richard M. Vogel,2 Charles N. Kroll,3 and James S. Famiglietti1,4,5 Received 28 January 2013; revised 27 August 2013; accepted 13 September 2013; published 15 November 2013. [1] The base flow recession constant, Kb, is used to characterize the interaction of groundwater and surface water systems. Estimation of Kb is critical in many studies including rainfall-runoff modeling, estimation of low flow statistics at ungaged locations, and base flow separation methods. The performance of several estimators of Kb are compared, including several new approaches which account for the impact of human withdrawals. A traditional semilog estimation approach adapted to incorporate the influence of human withdrawals was preferred over other derivative-based estimators. Human withdrawals are shown to have a significant impact on the estimation of base flow recessions, even when withdrawals are relatively small. Regional regression models are developed to relate seasonal estimates of Kb to physical, climatic, and anthropogenic characteristics of stream-aquifer systems. Among the factors considered for explaining the behavior of Kb, both drainage density and human withdrawals have significant and similar explanatory power. We document the importance of incorporating human withdrawals into models of the base flow recession response of a watershed and the systemic downward bias associated with estimates of Kb obtained without consideration of human withdrawals. Citation: Thomas, B. F., R. M. Vogel, C. N. Kroll, and J. S. Famiglietti (2013), Estimation of the base flow recession constant under human interference, Water Resour.
    [Show full text]
  • Module III - Water, Ecosystem Services, and Biodiversity
    Environmental Review Guide - Water, Ecosystem Services, and Biodiversity Module III - Water, Ecosystem Services, and Biodiversity The purpose of this module is to link the Regional Environmental Review Program to the goals of the Division of Ecological and Water Resources. The Division of Ecological and Water Resources works with others to: • Protect, restore, and sustain watershed functions (land-water connections, surface water resources) • Protect, restore, and sustain biodiversity and its adaptive potential • Protect, restore, and sustain groundwater resources • Provide and support excellent outdoor recreation opportunities • Minimize the negative economic and ecological impacts of invasive species • Support sustainable natural resource economies • Help achieve other DNR core objectives • Create and maintain a learning organization that implements the division’s guiding principles The Environmental Review Program is a key component in the Department of Natural Resources’ efforts to improve Minnesota’s water, ecosystem services, and biodiversity. DNR staff members involved in evaluating the effects of land- and water-use plans and economic development projects must take an integrated, systems-based, collaborative, and community- based approach to improving the habitat base and providing technical advice on actions that have the potential to adversely affect the environment. Staff must be ever mindful of the need to sustain (1) quantities and qualities of water that will ensure that Minnesota’s people and other biota can survive and thrive in the midst of changing trends in energy, climate, and demographics; (2) levels of diversity that will provide native Minnesota species and biomes with the resilience and adaptive capacities they need to evolve and thrive in the midst of changing conditions; and (3) economically vital ecosystem services that will provide Minnesota with economic and ecological security into the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Note 15-04 Aquifer Storage and Recovery in Texas: 2015
    Technical Note 15-04 AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY IN TEXAS: 2015 by Matthew Webb Texas Water Development Board Technical Note 15-04 Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Background ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Methods and Terms .................................................................................................................... 2 Definitions ................................................................................................................................... 4 Benefits and Challenges .............................................................................................................. 4 2011 Aquifer Storage and Recovery Assessment Report ........................................................... 5 Regulatory ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Source Water Permitting Requirements ..................................................................................... 7 Underground Injection Wells ...................................................................................................... 8 Groundwater Conservation Districts
    [Show full text]
  • WATER SECURITY STATUS REPORT December 2020
    WATER SECURITY STATUS REPORT December 2020 SEQ Water Grid capacity Average daily residential consumption Grid operations and overall water security position (L/Person) Despite receiving rainfall in parts of the northern and southern areas The Southern Regional Water Pipeline is still operating in a northerly 100% 250 2019 December average of South East Queensland (SEQ), the region continues to be in Drought direction. The Northern Pipeline Interconnectors (NPI 1 and 2) have been 90% 200 Response conditions with combined Water Grid storages at 57.8%. operating in a bidirectional mode, with NPI 1 flowing north while NPI 80% 150 2 flows south. The grid flow operations help to distribute water in SEQ Wivenhoe Dam remains below 50% capacity for the seventh 70% 100 where it is needed most. SEQ Drought Readiness 50 consecutive month. There was minimal rainfall in the catchment 60% average Drought Response 0 surrounding Lake Wivenhoe, our largest drinking water storage. The average residential water usage remains high at 172 litres per 50% person, per day (LPD). While this is less than the same period last year 40% 172 184 165 196 177 164 Although the December rain provided welcome relief for many of the (195 LPD), it is still 22 litres above the recommended 150 LPD average % region’s off-grid communities, Boonah-Kalbar and Dayboro are still under 57.8 30% *Data range is 03/12/2020 to 30/12/2020 and 05/12/2019 to 01/01/2020 according to the SEQ Drought Response Plan. drought response monitoring (see below for additional details). 20% See map below and legend at the bottom of the page for water service provider information The Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) outlook for January to March is likely 10% The Gold Coast Desalination Plant (GCDP) had been maximising to be wetter than average for much of Australia, particularly in the east.
    [Show full text]
  • Heuristic Continuous Base Flow Separation
    Heuristic Continuous Base Flow Separation Jozsef Szilagyi1 Abstract: A digital filtering algorithm for continuous base flow separation is compared to physically based simulations of base flow. It is shown that the digital filter gives comparable results to model simulations in terms of the multiyear base flow index when a filter coefficient is used that replicates the watershed-specific time delay of model simulations. This way, the application of the heuristic digital filter for practical continuous base flow separation can be justified when auxiliary hydrometeorological data ͑such as precipitation and air temperature͒ typically required for physically based base flow separation techniques are not available or not representative of the watershed. The filter coefficient can then be optimized upon an empirical estimate of the watershed-specific time delay, requiring only the drainage area of the watershed. DOI: 10.1061/͑ASCE͒1084-0699͑2004͒9:4͑311͒ CE Database subject headings: Base flow; Digital filters; Runoff; Streamflow; Algorithms. Introduction needed to obtain a good estimate on the amount of water available to runoff. Many times the precipitation record has discontinuities Detailed knowledge of groundwater contribution to streams, i.e., that can easily thwart efforts to perform continuous base flow base flow, is important in many water management areas: water separation using physically based techniques. Clearly, there is a supply, wastewater dilution, navigation, hydropower generation practical need for a technique that uses the most basic information ͑Dingman 1994͒ and aquifer characterization ͑Brutsaert and Nie- available: streamflow and the corresponding drainage area. The ber 1977; Troch et al. 1993; Szilagyi et al. 1998; Brutsaert and digital filtering technique of Nathan and McMahon ͑1990͒ is such Lopez 1998͒.
    [Show full text]
  • Ageing Water Storage Infrastructure: an Emerging Global Risk
    UNU-INWEH REPORT SERIES 11 Ageing Water Storage Infrastructure: An Emerging Global Risk Duminda Perera, Vladimir Smakhtin, Spencer Williams, Taylor North, Allen Curry www.inweh.unu.edu About UNU-INWEH UNU-INWEH’s mission is to help resolve pressing water challenges that are of concern to the United Nations, its Member States, and their people, through critical analysis and synthesis of existing bodies of scientific discovery; targeted research that identifies emerging policy issues; application of on-the-ground scalable science-based solutions to water issues; and global outreach. UNU-INWEH carries out its work in cooperation with the network of other research institutions, international organisations and individual scholars throughout the world. UNU-INWEH is an integral part of the United Nations University (UNU) – an academic arm of the UN, which includes 13 institutes and programmes located in 12 countries around the world, and dealing with various issues of development. UNU-INWEH was established, as a public service agency and a subsidiary body of the UNU, in 1996. Its operations are secured through long-term host-country and core-funding agreements with the Government of Canada. The Institute is located in Hamilton, Canada, and its facilities are supported by McMaster University. About UNU-INWEH Report Series UNU-INWEH Reports normally address global water issues, gaps and challenges, and range from original research on specific subject to synthesis or critical review and analysis of a problem of global nature and significance. Reports are published by UNU-INWEH staff, in collaboration with partners, as / when applicable. Each report is internally and externally peer-reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Service Benefits Generated by Improved Water Quality from Conservation Practices
    March, 2017 Chapter 2 Ecosystem Service Benefits Generated by Improved Water Quality from Conservation Practices Authors Synthesis Chapter - The Valuation of Ecosystem Services from Farms and Forests: Informing a systematic approach to quantifying benefits of conservation programs Project Co-Chair: L. Wainger, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Solomons, MD, [email protected] Project Co-Chair: D. Ervin, Portland State University, Portland, OR, [email protected] Chapter 1: Assessing Pollinator Habitat Services to Optimize Conservation Programs R. Iovanna, United States Department of Agriculture – Farm Service Agency, Washington, DC, [email protected] A. Ando, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, [email protected] S. Swinton, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, [email protected] J. Kagan, Oregon State/Portland State, Portland, OR, [email protected] D. Hellerstein, United States Department of Agriculture - Economic Research Agriculture, Washington, DC, [email protected] D. Mushet, U.S. Geological Survey, Jamestown, ND, [email protected] C. Otto, U.S. Geological Survey, Jamestown, ND, [email protected] Chapter 2: Ecosystem Service Benefits Generated by Improved Water Quality from Conservation Practices L. Wainger, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Solomons, MD, [email protected] J. Loomis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, [email protected] R. Johnston, Clark University, Worcester, MA, [email protected] L. Hansen, USDA ERS, United States Department of Agriculture - Economic Research Agriculture, Washington, DC, [email protected] D. Carlisle, United States Geological Survey, Reston, VA, [email protected] D. Lawrence, Blackwooods Group, Washington, DC, [email protected] N. Gollehon, United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service, Beltsville, MD, [email protected] L.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Evaluation of Hydrological Ecosystem Services in Mediterranean River Basins Applied to a Case Study in Southern Italy
    water Article Economic Evaluation of Hydrological Ecosystem Services in Mediterranean River Basins Applied to a Case Study in Southern Italy Marcello Mastrorilli 1, Gianfranco Rana 1, Giuseppe Verdiani 2,*, Giuseppe Tedeschi 2, Antonio Fumai 3 and Giovanni Russo 4 ID 1 Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment (CREA-AA), 70125 Bari, Italy; [email protected] (M.M.); [email protected] (G.R.) 2 Basin Authority of Apulia, 70010 Valenzano, Italy; [email protected] 3 MANZONI Learning (Fire Protection), 70125 Bari, Italy; [email protected] 4 Department of Disaat, University of Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-340-461-9902 Received: 21 December 2017; Accepted: 22 February 2018; Published: 26 February 2018 Abstract: Land use affects eco-hydrological processes with consequences for floods and droughts. Changes in land use affect ecosystems and hydrological services. The objective of this study is the analysis of hydrological services through the quantification of water resources, pollutant loads, land retention capacity and soil erosion. On the basis of a quantitative evaluation, the economic values of the ecosystem services are estimated. By assigning an economic value to the natural resources and to the hydraulic system, the hydrological services can be computed at the scale of catchment ecosystem. The proposed methodology was applied to the basin “Bonis” (Calabria Region, Italy). The study analyses four land use scenarios: (i) forest cover with good vegetative status (baseline scenario); (ii) modification of the forest canopy; (iii) variation in forest and cultivated surfaces; (iv) insertion of impermeable areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantitative Assessment of Surface Runoff and Base Flow Response to Multiple Factors in Pengchongjian Small Watershed
    Article Quantitative Assessment of Surface Runoff and Base Flow Response to Multiple Factors in Pengchongjian Small Watershed Lei Ouyang 1,2 , Shiyu Liu 1,2,*, Jingping Ye 1,2, Zheng Liu 1,2, Fei Sheng 1,2, Rong Wang 1 and Zhihong Lu 1 1 School of Land Resources and Environment, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China; [email protected] (L.O.); [email protected] (J.Y.); [email protected] (Z.L.); [email protected] (F.S.); [email protected] (R.W.); [email protected] (Z.L.) 2 Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Watershed Agricultural Resources and Ecology of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang 330045, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-158-7061-1238 Received: 22 July 2018; Accepted: 6 September 2018; Published: 10 September 2018 Abstract: Quantifying the impacts of multiple factors on surface runoff and base flow is essential for understanding the mechanism of hydrological response and local water resources management as well as preventing floods and droughts. Despite previous studies on quantitative impacts of multiple factors on runoff, there is still a need for assessment of the influence of these factors on both surface runoff and base flow in different temporal scales at the watershed level. The main objective of this paper was to quantify the influence of precipitation variation, evapotranspiration (ET) and vegetation restoration on surface runoff and base flow using empirical statistics and slope change ratio of cumulative quantities (SCRCQ) methods in Pengchongjian small watershed (116◦25048”–116◦2707” E, 29◦31044”–29◦32056” N, 2.9 km2), China. The results indicated that, the contribution rates of precipitation variation, ET and vegetation restoration to surface runoff were 42.1%, 28.5%, 29.4% in spring; 45.0%, 37.1%, 17.9% in summer; 30.1%, 29.4%, 40.5% in autumn; 16.7%, 35.1%, 48.2% in winter; and 35.0%, 38.7%, 26.3% in annual scale, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • EIS Executive Summary
    CONTENTS 1 PROJECT AND PROCESSES — OVERVIEW 1 1.1 The Project 1 1.2 The Proponent 2 1.3 Background to the Project 2 1.4 Project Objectives 3 1.5 EIS Process 4 1.6 Project Approvals 5 1.7 Submissions 6 1.8 Consultation Process 7 1.8.1 Objectives 7 1.8.2 Scope of Community Consultation 8 1.8.3 Consultation Phases and Activities 8 1.8.4 Reporting and evaluation 8 1.8.5 Consultation Results to Date 8 1.9 Sustainability 9 1.9.1 Vision for the Logan River Catchment 9 1.9.2 Goals for Sustainability 10 1.10 Alternative Options Considered 10 1.10.1 Surface Water Supply Alternatives 10 1.10.2 Economic Assessment of Alternatives 11 1.10.3 Cost and Benefits of the Project 11 1.10.4 Do Nothing Option 13 1.11 Project Description 14 1.11.1 Pre-Storage Activities 18 1.11.2 Construction/Materials 18 1.11.3 Construction Timetable/Hours of Operation 19 1.11.4 Workforce and Accommodation 19 1.11.5 Operations 20 1.11.6 Management of Extractions and Releases 20 2 IMPACT ASSESSMENT 21 2.1 Methodology 21 2.2 Environmental Overview 21 2.3 State and Local Government Requirements 21 2.4 Land Use and Tenure 21 2.4.1 Land Tenure 21 Wyaralong Dam – Environmental Impact Statement Executive Summary Page i 2.4.2 Land Use 22 2.4.3 Land Use Controls in Buffer Area 22 2.4.4 Environmental Land Use Changes 22 2.5 Infrastructure 23 2.6 Topography and Geomorphology 23 2.7 Soils and Geology 24 2.8 Landscape Character and Visual Amenity 24 2.9 Land Contamination 24 2.10 Hydrology 25 2.11 Groundwater 25 2.12 Surface Water Quality 26 2.13 Climate, Natural Hazards and Extreme Weather
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Soil-Water-Plant Environment
    William Northcott Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering Michigan State University NRCS Irrigation Training Feb 2-3 and 9-10, 2010 Irrigation Scheduling Process of maintaining an optimum water balance in the soil profile for crop growth and production Irrigation decisions are based on an accounting method on the water content in the soil Reasons for Irrigation in Fruits and Vegetables Crop Growth and Development Meeting the daily water use requirements Crop Establishment Transplants need water in excess of normal crop water use Frost Protection Sometimes requires more than one type – overhead for frost protection along with drip irrigation. Chemigation / Fertigation Herbicide Activation Irrigation Scheduling Components Plant Growth Stage and Water Use Soil Water Holding Capacity Evaporative Demand RECORDKEEPING Irrigation Scheduling Levels of Accounting 0 – Guessing (irrigate whenever) 1 – Using the “feel and see” method 2 – Using systematic irrigation (ex: ¾” every 4th day) 3 – Using a soil moisture measuring tool to start irrigation 4 – Using a soil moisture measuring tool to schedule irrigation and apply amounts based on a budgeting procedure 5 – Adjusting irrigation to plant water use, using a dynamic water balance based on budgeting procedure and plant stage and growth, together with a soil water moisture measuring tool. Irrigation Scheduling Components Plant Growth Stage and Water Use Soils and Water Holding Capacity Evaporative Demand RECORDKEEPING Plant Growth and Water Use Fundamentally crops use water to facilitate cell growth, maintain turgor pressure, and for cooling. Crop water use is driven by the evaporative demand of the atmosphere. Function of temperature, solar radiation, wind, relative humidity. Example, a fully developed corn crop in Michigan can use as high as 0.35 inches per day.
    [Show full text]