DOCSLIB.ORG

Jan-Mar, 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jan-Mar, 2016 JUDICIAL TRAINING & RESEARCH INSTITUTE, U.P., LUCKNOW Quarterly Digest CONSTITUTIONAL, CIVIL, CRIMINAL & REVENUE LAWS (Covering important judgments of Supreme Court and Allahabad High Court) January – March, 2016 Volume: XL1I Issue No.: 1 1 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.U. Khan Chairman [Patron] EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Mahboob Ali Director EDITOR-IN-CHARGE R.M.N. Mishra Additional Director (R EDITORS Sudhir Kumar – V, Addl. Director (Trg.) R.M.N. Mishra, Addl. Director Pradeep Kumar Singh, Addl. Director (Admin.) Pankaj Jaiswal, Dy. Director FINANCIAL ADVISOR Onkar Prasad Srivastava, Additional Director (Finance) ASSOCIATE B.K. Mishra, Research Officer ASSISTANCE Smt. Rashmi Gupta Girish Kumar Singh Anoop Kumar 2 FROM THE CHAIRMAN’S DESK On 13.05.2016 the last working day of the Supreme Court before summer vacations four new Judges of the Supreme Court took oath including Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court and Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan, Chief Justice, Kerala High Court who is from the Allahabad High Court and was appointed as Chief Justice of Kerala High Court about 2 years before. The other two Judges are Mr. Justice Ajay Manikrao Khanwilkar, Chief Justice, High Court of Madhya Pradesh and Mr. L. Nageshwar Rao who has been an Advocate of Supreme Court. Now there are only two vacancies in the Supreme Court. President rule in Uttarakhand has been revoked after floor test in the assembly on 10.5.2016 and Mr. Rawat has returned as Chief Minister. The result of the voting was kept in sealed cover and handed over to the Supreme Court where it was opened on the next day. Earlier Congress Government headed by Chief Minister Mr. Harish Rawat was removed and president rule was imposed on the ground that it no more enjoyed majority. The matter was brought first before the Uttarakhand High Court and thereafter before the Supreme Court. Following the Constitution Bench judgment of S. R. Bommai 1994 Supreme Court insisted that the majority must be shown on the floor of the Assembly and not anywhere else. Nine MLAs of the Ruling Party who formed a separate group were disqualified on the ground that they were less than 1/3rd of the total M.L.As. of the party hence their defection was illegal. The Speaker disqualified them. The disqualification order was neither stayed by the High Court of Uttarakahnd nor by the Supreme Court. Accordingly, those 9 MLAs did not participate in the voting on 10.05.2016. Similar situation had developed in U.P. in 1998 and the Allahabad High 3 Court had declared the appointment of Mr. Jagdambika Pal as Chief Minister by the Governor to be illegal. Under direction of the Supreme Court (reported in Jagdambika Pal v. Union of India AIR 1998 SC 998) floor test was held in the Assembly on 26.2.1998 in which the previous Chief Minister Sri Kalyan Singh proved his majority and was immediately restored, as C.M. At present, about 1/3rd of the Country is facing severe drought due to less rains during last 2 years. The Supreme Court is also monitoring the situation. It gave a 53 page judgment on 11.5.2016 noticing that the Center and affected States were showing lack of will in combating drought and saving lives which was described as national disaster. On 11.5.2016 Supreme Court also quashed the regulation of Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) regarding call drops. In 2010 and 2012 Medical Council of India and Dental Council of India issued 4 notifications introducing All India Combined National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET). The Supreme Court in Christian Medical College Vellore v. Union of India, 2014 (2) SCC 305 quashed the notifications. However on 11.4.2016 through order passed by a Constitution Bench reported in Medical Council of India v. Christian Medical College Vellore AIR 2016 SC 1774 the judgment was recalled on review petition and matters were directed to be heard again. The effect of the order is that from the current academic year admission to all medical and dental colleges will have to be made on the basis of NEET and no college or group of colleges, private or government, will be entitled to hold entrance test. The first entrance examination was held on 1.5.2016. Those who could not appear in the said examination can appear in the next examination to be held in July. Uttar Pradesh formally cancelled Combined Pre-medical Test (CPMT) 2016 on 12.05.2016. The test was to be held on 17.5.2016 in which 4 over one lakh candidates were to appear for 3200 seats. The Central Government and various State Governments particularly of Maharashtra under the pressure of students and medical colleges have once again applied to the Supreme Court as reported in the news paper of 13.5.2016, for postponing the NEET by one more year and permitting different colleges or group of colleges to hold their own entrance tests. On 13.5.2016 Supreme Court dismissed the case challenging the validity of criminal defamation law contained in Sections 499 and 500 I.P.C. There is widespread criticism of the judgment. In the editorial of Times of India dated 16.5.2016 (Lucknow Edition) it has been described as disappointing. In early May, 2016, son of a MLC belonging to the Ruling Party killed a person for overtaking his car in Bihar. Showing remarkable sense of responsibility the Government managed to arrest the accused quickly. If high handedness of higher ups particularly those who belong to the ruling party is checked with stern hand it sends a very strong message to the investigating agencies and instill confidence in the public. Vijay Mallya who is indebted to the different banks to the tune of several thousands of crors of rupees managed to leave the Country in early April, 2016. British Government has refused the request of the Indian Government to deport him back to India, however, Britain offered to consider extradition of Vijay Mallya. However this takes a long time as the procedure is quite cumbersome. The following latest leading authorities of the Supreme Court have been digested in this issue: 1. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Hilli Multipurpose Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. AIR 2016 SC 86 (3 judges) (written statement cannot be permitted to be filed after 90 days from the date of service of summons just as reply under Consumer Protection Act cannot be permitted 5 to be filed beyond 45 days from the date of service of notice. Kailash v. Nanku AIR 2005 SC 2441, taking contrary view held per incuriam.) 2. Bussa Overseas and Properties (P) Ltd. v. Union of India, AIR 2016 SC 938 (Appeal against rejection of review application is not maintainable without challenging the basic judgement.) 3. Shreya Vidyarthi v. Ashok Vidyarthi AIR 2016 SC 139 (A Hindu widow even though cannot be coparcener still she can act as such in the capacity of guardian of her minor son, who is to be Karta.) 4. Adi Saiva Sivachariyargal Nala Sangam v. Government of Tamil Nadu 2016 SC 209 ( Appointment of temple priest cannot be denied on the basis of cast, birth or other reasons not constitutionally acceptable) (case from Tamil Nadu) 5. Prem Nath Bali v. Registrar High Court of Delhi, AIR 2016 SC 101 (In case of delay of 9 years in completing disciplinary proceedings, the suspension period shall be calculated for determining pension if delay was not solely due to the employee.) 6. Shakti Kumar Gupta v. State of J & K, AIR 2016 SC 853 (Judicial Officer cannot be given average entry in the ACR merely on the ground that he has not submitted his Self Assessment Report.) 7. Lal Shah Baba Dargah Trust v. Magnum Developers AIR 2016 SC 381 (After amendment of 2013 in Sections 83, 85 of Wakf Act and until constitution of 3 Member Wakf Tribunal One Member Wakf Tribunal (Civil Judge) continues to have jurisdiction to decide matters. 6 8. Vishal N. Kalsaria v. Bank of India AIR 2016 SC 530 (SARFAESI Act 2000 does not override the provisions of Rent Control Act. Tenant of the property given in security cannot be evicted except through proceedings under the Rent Control Act.) Justice S.U. Khan Chairman, JTRI 7 SUBJECT INDEX (Supreme Court) Sl.No. Name of Act P.No. 1. Administrative Law 1 2. Arbitration Act 1 3. Bail 3 4. Civil Procedure Code 4 5. Constitution of India 12 6. Contract Act 16 7. Contract and Specific Relief 16 8. Criminal Procedure Code 17 9. Criminal Trial 25 10. Dowry Prohibition Act 31 11. Education Act 32 12. Evidence Act 33 13. Family Laws 36 14. Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act 37 15. Indian Penal Code 38 16. Insurance Act 44 17. Interpretation of Statutes 44 18. Land Acquisition Act 46 19. Motor Vehicles Act 47 20. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 48 21. Negotiable Instrument Act 49 22. Practice & Procedure 50 23. Prevention of Corruption Act 51 24. Process for Death Warrant 53 25. Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land 55 Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act 26. Right to Information Act 57 27. Service Laws 58 28. Rent Control Act 60 29. Sentencing 61 30. Specific Relief Act 62 31. Trade Mark Act 63 32. Transfer of Property Act 63 33. U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and 63 Eviction) Act 34. U.P. Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Rules 65 35. Wakf Act 65 36. Miscellaneous 66 * * * SUBJECT INDEX (High Court) Sl.No. Name of Act Page No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Uttarakhand Van Panchayats
    Law Environment and Development JournalLEAD ADMINISTRATIVE AND POLICY BOTTLENECKS IN EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF VAN PANCHAYATS IN UTTARAKHAND, INDIA B.S. Negi, D.S. Chauhan and N.P. Todaria COMMENT VOLUME 8/1 LEAD Journal (Law, Environment and Development Journal) is a peer-reviewed academic publication based in New Delhi and London and jointly managed by the School of Law, School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) - University of London and the International Environmental Law Research Centre (IELRC). LEAD is published at www.lead-journal.org ISSN 1746-5893 The Managing Editor, LEAD Journal, c/o International Environmental Law Research Centre (IELRC), International Environment House II, 1F, 7 Chemin de Balexert, 1219 Châtelaine-Geneva, Switzerland, Tel/fax: + 41 (0)22 79 72 623, [email protected] COMMENT ADMINISTRATIVE AND POLICY BOTTLENECKS IN EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF VAN PANCHAYATS IN UTTARAKHAND, INDIA B.S. Negi, D.S. Chauhan and N.P. Todaria This document can be cited as B.S. Negi, D.S. Chauhan and N.P. Todaria, ‘Administrative and Policy Bottlenecks in Effective Management of Van Panchayats in Uttarakhand, India’, 8/1 Law, Environment and Development Journal (2012), p. 141, available at http://www.lead-journal.org/content/12141.pdf B.S. Negi, Deputy Commissioner, Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi, India D.S. Chauhan, Department of Forestry, P.O. -59, HNB Garhwal University, Srinagar (Garhwal) – 246 174, Uttarakhand, India N.P. Todaria, Department of Forestry, P.O. -59, HNB Garhwal University, Srinagar (Garhwal) – 246 174, Uttarakhand, India, Email: [email protected] Published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 License TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Uttarakhand Lokayukta Bill, 2011 [Uttarakhand Bill No
    THE UTTARAKHAND LOKAYUKTA BILL, 2011 [UTTARAKHAND BILL NO. OF 2011] A Bill to establish an independent authority to investigate offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 so as to detect corruption by expeditious investigation and to prosecute offenders and redressal of certain types of public grievances and to provide protection to whistleblowers. Be it enacted by Legislative Assembly of Uttarakhand in the Sixty-second year of the Republic of India as follows:- CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY Short title, 1. (1) This Act may be called the Uttarakhand Lokayukta Act, 2011. commencement (2) For the purpose of preparations, the provisions of the Act shall and extent come into force at once and the Act shall be operationalised within 180 days of its securing assent from the Governor of Uttarakhand. (3) It extends to the whole of the State of Uttarakhand. Definitions 2. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires:- (a) “Board” means the Chairperson and the other members of the Lokayukta collectively. (b) “Complaint” means an allegation of corruption or a request by whistleblower for protection or a request for redressal of certain grievances covered under this Act. (c) “Lokayukta” means and includes, (i) The Board; (ii) Benches constituted under this Act and performing functions under this Act; (d) “Lokayukta Bench” means a Bench of two or more members of the 1 Lokayukta with or without the Chairperson acting together in respect of any matter in accordance with the regulations framed under the Act. Each bench shall have a member with
    [Show full text]
  • (PIL) No. 26 of 2020 Dr. Subramanian Swamy … Petitioner Versus St
    WWW.LIVELAW.IN RESERVED JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (PIL) No. 26 of 2020 Dr. Subramanian Swamy … Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others … Respondents And Writ Petition (M/S) No. 700 of 2020 Sri 5 Mandir Samiti Gangotri Dham and another … Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others … Respondents Dr. Subramanian Swamy, petitioner, in-person in Writ Petition (PIL) No. 26 of 2020. Ms. Manisha Bhandari, learned counsel for the petitioner in Writ Petition (PIL) No. 26 of 2020. Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Devang Dobhal, learned counsel for the petitioners in Writ Petition (M/S) No. 700 of 2020. Mr. S.N. Babulkar, learned Advocate General assisted by Mr. Paresh Tripathi, learned Chief Standing Counsel, for the State of Uttarakhand. Mr. D.C.S. Rawat, learned Standing Counsel for the Union of India. Mr. Ravi Babulkar, learned counsel for the third respondent in Writ Petition (M/S) No. 700 of 2020. Mr. Kartikey Hari Gupta, learned counsel for the Intervener in Writ Petition (PIL) No. 26 of 2020. Judgment Reserved : 06.07.2020 Judgment Delivered : 21.07.2020 Chronological list of cases referred : 1. AIR 1959 Ori 5 2. AIR 1964 SC 1501 3. (1996) 9 SCC 548 4. AIR 1963 SC 1638 5. (1997) 4 SCC 606 6. AIR 1955 SC 540 7. AIR 1946 PC 127 8. AIR 1965 SC 745 9. (1982) 1 SCC 271 10. AIR 1958 SC 883 11. AIR 1958 SC 538 12. (2012) 6 SCC 312 13. (1996) 3 SCR 721 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Compendium.Pdf
    Press council cover job no 2032 date : 29-11-13 PRESS COUNCIL OF INDIA Compendium of Adjudications (April 1, 2012- March 31, 2013) New Delhi Printed at : Chandu Press, D-97, Shakarpur, Delhi-110 092 Contents Preface Index of Adjudications of the Council for -- 1 the Period April 1, 2012 – March 31, 2013 Adjudications of the Council -- 16 PREFACE The Press Council of India is required under the statute not only to promote the standards of the press but also to protect it from any onslaught or threats to its freedom. Such threats normally emanate from the authorities of the governments. The Press Council of India enjoys adjudicatory jurisdiction over any decision/action of the government that may be, or may even perceived to be, an attempt to control the freedom of journalists. In its adjudicatory function it also considers the complaints made by public or governmental authorities against the Press for violating the ethics in journalism. I am happy to state that I have, in keeping with the mandate of the Press Council attempted to inculcate the ethos of ethics (rather than punishment) by attempting settlement between the parties or allowing the respondents to make amends for their lapses. This, I feel, is how the Council should function as mediation is, in my opinion, the democratic approach. Adjudications rendered by the Council, including those in which principles of far reaching importance to guide the conduct of the press and the authorities were laid down, during the period under review have been comprehensively covered in this Compendium which I hope and trust the readers will find useful and informative as the earlier ones.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Matters - Elections Relating to Gram Panchayats and Zila Parishad
    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 14-01-2020 CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT (TIME : 10:30 AM) NOTE : Chronology is based on the date of initial filing. NOTE:- ALTERNATIVE BENCH [ IF THE CONSTITUTION BENCH DOES NOT SIT FOR ANY REASON OR THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE THE CONSTITUTION BENCH IN THIS COURT ARE OVER, THE FOLLOWING MATTERS WILL BE TAKEN UP BY THIS BENCH ] [ "REQUEST FOR " NOT TO DELETE A MATTER" AND ALL CIRCULATIONS (IF THE MATTERS ARE NOT ON BOARD FOR THE DAY) NEED NOT BE MENTIONED BEFORE THE BENCH. SUCH REQUEST BE HANDED OVER TO THE CONCERNED COURT MASTERS IN ADVANCE BEFORE 10.30 A.M. " ] REGULAR HEARING Petitioner/Respondent SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Advocate Election Matters - Elections relating to Gram Panchayats and Zila Parishad 101 C.A. No. 2162/2009 POP SINGH PAWAR AND ANR. PRATIBHA JAIN IV-A Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS. Indirect Taxes Matters - Interpretation of exemption notifications under Central Excise Act 102 C.A. No. 999/2007 UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY B. KRISHNA PRASAD X Versus M/S. MOOL CHAND INDUS. ESTATE P.LTD. SANJAY JAIN THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SHRI MOOL CHAND AGARWAL 102. Connected MINISTRY OF FINANCE SECRETARY B. KRISHNA PRASAD 1 C.A. No. 1000/2007 X Versus M/S BHAWANI PLASTICS ITS PROPRIETOR SHRI SANJAI KUMAR PATHAK SUDEEP AGARWAL 102.
    [Show full text]
  • Third State Finance Commission
    CHAPTER 5 STATUS OF DECENTRALISED GOVERNANCE A. Brief Historical Overview 5.1 Modern local government in India has a rather long history extending to the earliest years of British rule under the East India Company, when a municipal body was established in Madras in 1688 followed soon thereafter by Bombay and Calcutta. These earliest corporations neither had any legislative backing, having been set up on the instructions of the Directors of the East India Company with the consent of the Crown, nor were they representative bodies as they consisted entirely of nominated members from among the non-native population. They were set up mainly to provide sanitation in the Presidency towns, but they did not prove to be very effective in this task. Act X of 1842 was the first formal measure for the establishment of municipal bodies. Though applicable only to the Bengal Presidency it remained inoperative there. Town Committees under it were, however, set up in the two hill stations of Mussoorie and Nainital in 1842 and 1845 respectively, on the request of European residents. Uttarakhand thus has the distinction of having some of the earliest municipalities established in the country, outside the Presidency towns. Their record too was not very encouraging. When the Government of India passed Act XXVI in 1850 the municipal bodies of Mussoorie and Nainital were reconstituted under it. 5.2 The motivation for establishing municipal bodies in the initial years was not any commitment to local government on the part of the British. Rather it was inspired by the desire to raise money from the local population for provision of civic services.
    [Show full text]
  • Ilr - Cut-1048
    2015 (II) ILR - CUT-1048 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ANIL R. DAVE , J & ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7217 OF 2013 (WITH BATCH) PRAKASH & ORS. .....…Appellants .Vrs. PHULAVATI & ORS. ……..Respondents (A) HINDU SUCCESSION ACT, 1956 – S.6 (As amended in 2005) Whether Hindu succession (Amendment) Act 2005 will have retrospective effect ? Held, No. The text of the amendment itself clearly provides that the right conferred on a daughter of a coparcener is on and from the commencement of Hindu succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 – An amendment of a substantive provision is always prospective unless either expressly or by necessary intendment it is retrospective – In the present case there is neither any express provision for giving retrospective effect to the amended provision nor necessary intendment to that effect – In the other hand proviso to section 6 (I) and section 6 (5) clearly intend to exclude the transactions referred to therein which may have taken place prior to 20.12.2004 on which date the bill was introduced – Object of giving finality to transactions prior to 20.12.2004 is not to make the main provision retrospective – Held, the above amendment is prospective in nature – Rights under the amendment are applicable to living daughters of living coparceners as on 09.09.2005 irrespective of when such daughters are born – Disposition or alienation including partitions which may have taken place before 20.12.2004 as per law applicable prior to the said date will remain unaffected – Any transaction of partition effected thereafter will be governed by the explanation – The impugned order passed by the High court is set aside.
    [Show full text]
  • Tariff Orders for FY 2018-19
    Order on True up for FY 2016-17, Annual Performance Review for FY 2017-18 & ARR for FY 2018-19 For Power Transmission Corporation of Uttarakhand Ltd. March 21, 2018 Uttarakhand Electricity Regulatory Commission Vidyut Niyamak Bhawan, Near I.S.B.T., P.O. Majra Dehradun – 248171 Table of Contents 1 Background and Procedural History .................................................................................................... 4 2 Stakeholders’ Objections/Suggestions, Petitioner’s Responses and Commission’s Views ...... 8 2.1 Capitalisation of New Assets ...................................................................................................................... 8 2.1.1 Stakeholder’s Comments ........................................................................................................................... 8 2.1.2 Petitioner’s Response ................................................................................................................................. 8 2.1.3 Commission’s Views .................................................................................................................................. 9 2.2 Carrying Cost of Deficit ............................................................................................................................. 10 2.2.1 Stakeholder’s Comments ......................................................................................................................... 10 2.2.2 Petitioner’s Response ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Beware of Touts, Do Not Handover Your Original Documents /Certificates to Touts, They Will Mislead You”
    “BEWARE OF TOUTS, DO NOT HANDOVER YOUR ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS /CERTIFICATES TO TOUTS, THEY WILL MISLEAD YOU” NO CANDIDATE OF OPEN CATEGORY WILL BE ENROLLED IN UNIT HEADQUARTERS QUOTA EXCEPT SPORTSMEN & MUSICIAN CATEGORY NO COMMUNICATION DEVICE, CELL PHONES WITH CAMERA AND STORAGE DEVICE (INCLUDING BLUE TOOTH) PERMITTED DURING RECRUITMENT RALLY THE GATE OPENING TIME WILL BE 0430 HRS TO 0530 HRS (NO CANDIDATE WILL BE ALLOWED ENTRY AFTER 0530 HRS) CANDIDATES NOT IN POSSESSION OF ANY REQUIRED DOCUMENTS ON RESPECTIVE DAY OF RALLY WILL BE REJECTED FORTHWITH WARDS OF CIV EMPLOYEES, POLICE, PARA MIL FORCES, AIR FORCE, NAVY, GREF AND MES ARE NOT PERMITTED TO THE SAID RECRUITMENT RALLY CANDIDATES HAVE TO APPEAR THE PHYSICAL TEST AT THEIR OWN RISK. NEITHER CANDIDATES NOR THEIR LEGAL HEIRS ARE ENTITLED TO CLAIM ANY COMPENSATION OR OTHER RELIEF FROM THE GOVERNMENT IN CASE OF INJURY/DEATH SUSTAINED DURING ANY OF THE TEST Mil Tele: 6607 Headquarters Bengal Engineer Gp & Centre PIN 900477 c/o 56 APO 1763/Rally/Rtg 19 Jun 2021 _________________________________________ (All Rajya Sainik Boards, SAIs, All Regtl Trg Centres, All major/Minor units of BEG(R) & BSCs, List A & CME Pune) RECRUITMENT RALLY UNDER UNIT HEADQUARTERS QUOTA AT BENGAL ENGINEER GROUP AND CENTRE ROORKEE WEF 26 JUL 2021 TO 03 AUG 2021 1. Unit Headquarters Quota Recruitment Rally is being conducted at BEG & Centre, Roorkee for Sol GD, Sol Tech, Sol Tdn & Sol Clk/SKT/IM and International/National level sportsmen & Musician Cat. Schedule of the rally is as under:- Ser Date States (a) 26 Jul 2021 Haryana, J&K, Ladakh and Himachal Pradesh (b) 27 Jul 2021 Punjab Uttarakhand, Rajasthan, Bihar, Assam, Orissa, West Bengal (c) 29 Jul 2021 and Delhi (d) 31 Jul 2021 Uttar Pradesh 02 Aug 2021 Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Madhya Pradesh, (e) Gujarat, Maharashtra and Any balance State/UT (other than mentioned above) of India.
    [Show full text]
  • Orders of Appointment of Shri Justice Ravi Vijaykumar Malimath , Senior
    (TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, PART 1 SECTION 2) No.K-11019/07/2020-US.II Government of India Ministry of Law and Justice (Department of Justice) Jaisalmer House, 26, Man Singh Road, NEW DELHI-II0 011, dated 16th July, 2020. NOTIFICATION In exercise of the powers conferred by Article 223 of the Constitution of India, the President is pleased to appoint Shri Justice Ravi Vijaykumar Malimath, senior-most Judge of the Uttarakhand High Court, to perform the duties of the office of Chief Justice of that High Court with effect from zs" July, 2020 consequent upon the retirement of Shri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan, Chief Justice, Uttarakhand High Court. *,tl-W-W (Rajinder Kashyap) Joint Secretary to the Government of India Tele: 2338 3037 To The Manager, Government of India Press, Minto Road, New Delhi 2 No. K. 1l019/07/2020-US.II Dated 16.07.2020 Copy to:- 1 Shri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan, Chief Justice, Uttarakhand High Court, Nainital. 2 Shri Justice Ravi Vijaykumar Malimath, Judge, Uttarakhand High Court, Nainital. 3 The Secretary to the Governor, Uttarakhand, Dehradun. 4 The Secretary to the Chief Minister, Uttarakhand, Dehradun. 5 The Secretary to the Chief Justice, Uttarakhand High Court, Nainital. 6 The Chief Secretary, Government ofUttarakhand, Dehradun. 7 The Registrar General, Uttarakhand High Court, Nainital. 8 The Accountant General, Uttarakhand, Dehradun. 9 The President's Secretariat, (CA.lI Section), New Delhi 10 PS to Principal Secretary to the Prime Minister, New Delhi. 11 Registrar (Conf.), 0/0 Chief Justice of India, 5 Krishna Menon Marg, New Delhi. 12 PS to ML&J/PPS to Secretary (J)/JS(RKK)/SO(Desk) 13 Technical Director, NIC, Department of Justice, with a request to upload on the Website of the Department (www.doj.gov.in).
    [Show full text]
  • (Delivered by Hon'ble Anil Kumar, J.) 1. Matter Is Taken in the Revised
    3 All] Dinesh Chand Pandey V. Shri Narain Pathak and others 1287 ORIGINAL JURISDICTION (Delivered by Hon'ble Anil Kumar, J.) CIVIL SIDE DATED: LUCKNOW 25.11.2010 1. Matter is taken in the revised cause list. BEFORE THE HON'BLE ANIL KUMAR, J. 2. None appeared on behalf of the Civil Revision No. 52 of 2001 answering respondents. Dinesh Chand Pandey and others Heard Sri U.S. Sahai, learned ...Petitioner counsel for the revisionist and perused the Versus record. Shri Narain Pathak and others ...Respondent 3. Facts in brief as submitted by the Counsel for the Petitioner: learned counsel for the revisionist are that Sri U.S. Sahai initially a regular suit (Suit No. 107 of Sri D.C. Mukharji 1994) filed by plaintiff/O.P. Nos. 1 to 18 in the court of IVth Additional Chief Counsel for the Respondent: Judicial Magistrate/Additional Civil Sri D.C. Mukharjee Judge (Sr. Div.), Sultanpur in which the present revisionists are defendants. Code of Civil Procedure Order XIV Rule 2 as amended by Act No. 104 of 1976- 4. On the basis of pleadings, the Rule 2 (2)-Preliminary issue-regarding issues were framed by the trial court and bar of 22 of U.P. Intermediate Act 1921 and Section 14 of payment of issue No. 5 and 6 are as under:- salary Act-trial Court rejected the request for decision of preliminary (a) whether the present suit is barred issue as first-held-Trail Court not in view of the provisions as provided exercised its discretion properly-an under Section 22 of the U.P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journal of Parliamentary Information ______VOLUME LXVI NO.1 MARCH 2020 ______
    The Journal of Parliamentary Information ________________________________________________________ VOLUME LXVI NO.1 MARCH 2020 ________________________________________________________ LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI ___________________________________ The Journal of Parliamentary Information VOLUME LXVI NO.1 MARCH 2020 CONTENTS PARLIAMENTARY EVENTS AND ACTIVITIES PROCEDURAL MATTERS PARLIAMENTARY AND CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENTS DOCUMENTS OF CONSTITUTIONAL AND PARLIAMENTARY INTEREST SESSIONAL REVIEW Lok Sabha Rajya Sabha State Legislatures RECENT LITERATURE OF PARLIAMENTARY INTEREST APPENDICES I. Statement showing the work transacted during the Second Session of the Seventeenth Lok Sabha II. Statement showing the work transacted during the 250th Session of the Rajya Sabha III. Statement showing the activities of the Legislatures of the States and Union Territories during the period 1 October to 31 December 2019 IV. List of Bills passed by the Houses of Parliament and assented to by the President during the period 1 October to 31 December 2019 V. List of Bills passed by the Legislatures of the States and the Union Territories during the period 1 October to 31 December 2019 VI. Ordinances promulgated by the Union and State Governments during the period 1 October to 31 December 2019 VII. Party Position in the Lok Sabha, Rajya Sabha and the Legislatures of the States and the Union Territories PARLIAMENTARY EVENTS AND ACTIVITES ______________________________________________________________________________ CONFERENCES AND SYMPOSIA 141st Assembly of the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU): The 141st Assembly of the IPU was held in Belgrade, Serbia from 13 to 17 October, 2019. An Indian Parliamentary Delegation led by Shri Om Birla, Hon’ble Speaker, Lok Sabha and consisting of Dr. Shashi Tharoor, Member of Parliament, Lok Sabha; Ms. Kanimozhi Karunanidhi, Member of Parliament, Lok Sabha; Smt.
    [Show full text]