DOCSLIB.ORG

Compendium.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Compendium.Pdf Press council cover job no 2032 date : 29-11-13 PRESS COUNCIL OF INDIA Compendium of Adjudications (April 1, 2012- March 31, 2013) New Delhi Printed at : Chandu Press, D-97, Shakarpur, Delhi-110 092 Contents Preface Index of Adjudications of the Council for -- 1 the Period April 1, 2012 – March 31, 2013 Adjudications of the Council -- 16 PREFACE The Press Council of India is required under the statute not only to promote the standards of the press but also to protect it from any onslaught or threats to its freedom. Such threats normally emanate from the authorities of the governments. The Press Council of India enjoys adjudicatory jurisdiction over any decision/action of the government that may be, or may even perceived to be, an attempt to control the freedom of journalists. In its adjudicatory function it also considers the complaints made by public or governmental authorities against the Press for violating the ethics in journalism. I am happy to state that I have, in keeping with the mandate of the Press Council attempted to inculcate the ethos of ethics (rather than punishment) by attempting settlement between the parties or allowing the respondents to make amends for their lapses. This, I feel, is how the Council should function as mediation is, in my opinion, the democratic approach. Adjudications rendered by the Council, including those in which principles of far reaching importance to guide the conduct of the press and the authorities were laid down, during the period under review have been comprehensively covered in this Compendium which I hope and trust the readers will find useful and informative as the earlier ones. Markandey Katju Chairman Press Council of India Index of Adjudications of the Council for the Period April 1, 2012- March 31, 2013 Sl. Parties Date of Decision No. Harassment of Newsmen 1 Complaint of Shri Sandeep Kumar Shukla, Correspondent, April 26, 2012 Black Tiger, Hindi Daily, Khiri, U.P. against Shri K.P. Singh, Forest Ranger, Gola Range, Khiri, U.P. 2 Complaint of Shri Kamlesh Trivedi, Correspondent, Rahat ,, Times, Lakhimpur Khiri, U.P. against Shri Yogender Singh, S.H.O., Police Station-Gola, Khiri, U.P. 3 Complaint of Ali Mohd., Journalist, Apradh Today, ,, Sitapur, U.P. against Shri R.P. Sahi, SHO, Sardar Harmeet Singh and other local police authorities, Sitapur, U.P. 4 Complaint of Choudhary Ved Prakash Chahar, City Chief, ,, Aaj, Agra, Uttar Pradesh against local police authorities and anti-social elements. 5 Complaint of Shri Anil Shukla, Reporter, Aaj, Lakhimpur ,, Khiri, Uttar Pradesh against the Forest Officer, South Forest Department, Khiri, U.P. 6 Complaint of Shri Anand Singh, District Representative, ,, Aaj, Hindi Dainik, Faizabad, Uttar Pradesh against District Magistrate and Superintendent of Police, Ambedkar Nagar, Uttar Pradesh. 7 Complaint of Shri Lallan Prasad Gupta, Correspondent, ,, Amar Ujala, Mau, U.P. against anti-social elements. 8 Complaint of Shri Vijay Prakash, Representative, Sharp ,, Reporter, Azamgarh, U.P. against the Superintendent of Police, Azamgarh, U.P. 9 Complaint of Shri Naresh Kumar Gupta, Correspondent, ,, Maya Awadh, Hardoi, Uttar Pradesh against Chief Medical Officer, District Hospital, Hardoi, Uttar Pradesh. 10 Complaint of Shri Ramanand Singh Chandel, District ,, Correspondent, Saral Sahara, Unnao, Uttar Pradesh against the Superintendent of Police, Unnao, Uttar Pradesh. 1 Sl. Parties Date of No. Decision 11. Complaint of Shri Omprakash Baghel, Editor, Duniya Ek April 26, 2012 Nazar Main, Aligarh, U.P. against anti-social elements, Aligarh, U.P. 12 Suo-motu inquiry initiated against the Government of ,, Uttar Pradesh regarding arrest of Muzaffarnagar based journalist. 13 Complaint of Shri Ashok Rawat, Chief Editor, Braj ,, Kranti, Hathras, Uttar Pradesh against the Divisional Joint Education Director, Hathras, Uttar Pradesh. 14 Complaint of Shri Rajiv Yadav, Journalist, Amar Ujala, ,, District Farukhabad, U.P. against local police authorities. 15 Complaint of Shri Shashi Bhushan Dubey, Bureau Chief, ,, Vindhya Bharat, Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh against the local police authorities and liquor mafia, Mirzapur, U.P. 16 Complaint of Shri Sudhir Jain, Journalist, Swadesh, Jhansi, ,, Uttar Pradesh against Additional District Magistrate, Mauranipur and SHO, Mauranipur, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh. 17 Complaint of Shri Ganesh Kumar Shukla, Reporter, ,, Adarsh Panchayati Raj, Chitrakoot, Uttar Pradesh against (i) Shri Akhilesh Pandey, CO, (ii) Shri Mahesh Singh, SHO, Rajapur, (iii) Shri Nandlal Singh, SHO, Pahari, U.P. 18 Complaint of Shri P. Dillibabu Reddy, Editor, Asha Jyothi December 21, & Vice-President, Andhra Pradesh Working Journalists 2012 Federation, Chitoor (A.P.) against Shri I.Y.R. Krishna Rao, Executive Officer, Tirumala Tirupati Devastanams, Tirupati. 19 Complaint of Md. Hashim Azad Khan, Chief Editor, ,, Azad Par Julm, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh against Shri Sanjay Tiwari, Assistant Regional Transport Officer, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh. 20 Complaint of Shri Suresh Gandhi, Correspondent, Dainik ,, Hindustan and Dainik Aaj Tak Channel, Bhadoi, Uttar Pradesh against Shri R.K. Singh, Inspector and Shri Rambali Saroj, Chowki, Nai Bazar, Bhadoi, U.P. 2 Sl. Parties Date of No. Decision 21 Complaint of Shri Santosh Kumar Dixit, Correspondent, December 21, Amar Ujala, Jaunpur (U.P.) against Shri Ram Chander 2012 Gautam, S.H.O., Sarpatahan, Jaunpur, U.P. 22 Complaint of Shri Sanjay Kumar ‘Punnu’ Journalist and ,, President, Shobha Club, Rohtas (Bihar) against Shri Ranjit Mishra, City Superintendent of Police, Darbange, Bihar. 23 Complaint of Shri Ramanand Soni, Bureau Chief, Dainik February 18, Patrika, Bhind, M.P. against Shri Chanchal Shekhar, 2013 Superintendent of Police, Bhind, M.P. 24 Complaint of Shri Jaiprakash Bhardwaj, Correspondent, ,, Chetna Manch, Sahibabad, Gaziabad, U.P. against Shri Chandev Ram Jatav, Ration Dealer, Ghaziabad. 25 Complaint of Shri Amlendu Upadhyay, Assistant- Editor, ,, Swabhiman Times, Ghaziabad, U.P. against Shri Banvari Lal Kushwaha, CMD, Garima Milk Industries and Swabhiman Times and Shri Nirmalendu Saha, Editor, Swabhiman Times, Delhi. 26 Complaint of Shri C.S. Kalra, Editor, University Today, ,, New Delhi against the Vice-Chancellor, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi. Facilities to the Press 27 Complaint of Shri Shishir Kumar Gupta, Publisher, April 26, 2012 Hukoomat Express, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh against the DAVP, New Delhi. 28 Complaint of Dr. H.H. Majid Hussain, Chief Editor/ August 27, 2012 Publisher, Daily Urdu Action, Bhopal against the DAVP. 29 Complaint of Shri Veerbhadrappa Lingappa Jherkunte, ,, Editor, Jantadhish, Latur, Maharashtra against the SDM, Udgir and RNI. 30 Complaint of Dr. Ravi Rastogi, Editor/Publisher, December 21, Himalaya Aur Hindustan, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand against 2012 the Director General, Information and Public Relations Department, Government of Uttarakhand, Dehradun. 3 Sl. Parties Date of No. Decision 31 Complaint of Shri Jai Prakash Tamkoria, Publisher/ February 18, Correspondent, Chhattisgarh Vaibhav, Korba, Chhattisgarh 2013 against The Directorate, Information and Public Relations Department, Government of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 32 Complaint of Shri Subhash Jain, Chief Editor, Aaj ,, Ki Janta, Indore, M.P. against Department of Public Relations, Government of Madhya Pradesh, M.P. 33 Complaint of Shri Raghunath Singh, Dy. General Manager, ,, Rajasthan Patrika Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur against the Mayor, Jaipur Municipal Corporation, Jaipur. 34 Complaint of Shri Raghunath Singh, Dy. General Manager, ,, Rajasthan Patrika Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur against I&PRD, Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal. Principles and Publication 35 Complaints of Chairman, Employment Promotion Council August 27, 2012 of Indian Personnel, Mumbai against the Editors, Global Jobs (Times of India), Mumbai, Assignment Abroad Times, Mumbai and Mumbai Mirror, Mumbai 36 Complaint of Ms. Suchita Kumbhar, General Secretary, ,, Network by People Living with HIV & AIDS, Mumbai against the Editor, Mid Day, Mumbai 37 Complaint of Shri Narayan S. Navti, Joint Chief Electoral ,, Officer, Panaji, Goa against the Editor, Navprabha, Panaji, Goa 38 Complaint of Shri Abu Asim Azmi, (Ex-M.P.) and then ,, MLA, Maharashtra, Mumbai against the Editor, The Urdu Times, Mumbai 39 Complaints of Shri P.P. Kapur, Haryana State Convenor, December 21, Labour Organization IFTU, Haryana against the Editors 2012 (i) Punjab Kesari, Jalandhar, (ii) Dainik Bhaskar, Panipat and (iii) Dainik Jagran, Panipat. 40 Complaint of Shri Shamsher Singh, State General ,, Secretary, Indian Justice Party, Ambala, Haryana against the Editor, Punjab Kesari, Ambala Cantt., Haryana. 4 Sl. Parties Date of No. Decision 41 Complaint of Shri Lokesh Kumar Malik, Advocate, December 21, Sonepat, Haryana against the Editor, Dainik Bhaskar, 2012 Panipat, Haryana. 42 Complaint of Shri N. Konda Reddy, Indian National ,, Congress Worker, Kadapa District, A.P. against the Editor, Sakshi Daily, Hyderabad, A.P. 43 Complaint of Prof. M.K. Vasantha, Chairman, Akashdeep ,, Enclave Residence Welfare Society (AERWS), Roorkee, Uttar Pradesh against the Editor, Dainik Jagran, Haridwar 44 Suo-motu actions on reference from Election Commission ,, of India against Dainik Hindustan, Dainik Jagran, Prabhat Khabar, Aaj, Rashtriya Sahara, The Hindustan Times, Purvanchal Ki Raah, and Dainik Udyog and Vyapar Times for publication of allegedly ‘Paid News’ during election in the grab of news. 45 Complaint of Shri Sushanta Swain, Orissa against the ,, Editor, Sambad, Bhubaneswar, Orissa. 46 Complaint of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Uttarakhand Lokayukta Bill, 2011 [Uttarakhand Bill No
    THE UTTARAKHAND LOKAYUKTA BILL, 2011 [UTTARAKHAND BILL NO. OF 2011] A Bill to establish an independent authority to investigate offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 so as to detect corruption by expeditious investigation and to prosecute offenders and redressal of certain types of public grievances and to provide protection to whistleblowers. Be it enacted by Legislative Assembly of Uttarakhand in the Sixty-second year of the Republic of India as follows:- CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY Short title, 1. (1) This Act may be called the Uttarakhand Lokayukta Act, 2011. commencement (2) For the purpose of preparations, the provisions of the Act shall and extent come into force at once and the Act shall be operationalised within 180 days of its securing assent from the Governor of Uttarakhand. (3) It extends to the whole of the State of Uttarakhand. Definitions 2. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires:- (a) “Board” means the Chairperson and the other members of the Lokayukta collectively. (b) “Complaint” means an allegation of corruption or a request by whistleblower for protection or a request for redressal of certain grievances covered under this Act. (c) “Lokayukta” means and includes, (i) The Board; (ii) Benches constituted under this Act and performing functions under this Act; (d) “Lokayukta Bench” means a Bench of two or more members of the 1 Lokayukta with or without the Chairperson acting together in respect of any matter in accordance with the regulations framed under the Act. Each bench shall have a member with
    [Show full text]
  • (PIL) No. 26 of 2020 Dr. Subramanian Swamy … Petitioner Versus St
    WWW.LIVELAW.IN RESERVED JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (PIL) No. 26 of 2020 Dr. Subramanian Swamy … Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others … Respondents And Writ Petition (M/S) No. 700 of 2020 Sri 5 Mandir Samiti Gangotri Dham and another … Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others … Respondents Dr. Subramanian Swamy, petitioner, in-person in Writ Petition (PIL) No. 26 of 2020. Ms. Manisha Bhandari, learned counsel for the petitioner in Writ Petition (PIL) No. 26 of 2020. Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Devang Dobhal, learned counsel for the petitioners in Writ Petition (M/S) No. 700 of 2020. Mr. S.N. Babulkar, learned Advocate General assisted by Mr. Paresh Tripathi, learned Chief Standing Counsel, for the State of Uttarakhand. Mr. D.C.S. Rawat, learned Standing Counsel for the Union of India. Mr. Ravi Babulkar, learned counsel for the third respondent in Writ Petition (M/S) No. 700 of 2020. Mr. Kartikey Hari Gupta, learned counsel for the Intervener in Writ Petition (PIL) No. 26 of 2020. Judgment Reserved : 06.07.2020 Judgment Delivered : 21.07.2020 Chronological list of cases referred : 1. AIR 1959 Ori 5 2. AIR 1964 SC 1501 3. (1996) 9 SCC 548 4. AIR 1963 SC 1638 5. (1997) 4 SCC 606 6. AIR 1955 SC 540 7. AIR 1946 PC 127 8. AIR 1965 SC 745 9. (1982) 1 SCC 271 10. AIR 1958 SC 883 11. AIR 1958 SC 538 12. (2012) 6 SCC 312 13. (1996) 3 SCR 721 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Matters - Elections Relating to Gram Panchayats and Zila Parishad
    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 14-01-2020 CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT (TIME : 10:30 AM) NOTE : Chronology is based on the date of initial filing. NOTE:- ALTERNATIVE BENCH [ IF THE CONSTITUTION BENCH DOES NOT SIT FOR ANY REASON OR THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE THE CONSTITUTION BENCH IN THIS COURT ARE OVER, THE FOLLOWING MATTERS WILL BE TAKEN UP BY THIS BENCH ] [ "REQUEST FOR " NOT TO DELETE A MATTER" AND ALL CIRCULATIONS (IF THE MATTERS ARE NOT ON BOARD FOR THE DAY) NEED NOT BE MENTIONED BEFORE THE BENCH. SUCH REQUEST BE HANDED OVER TO THE CONCERNED COURT MASTERS IN ADVANCE BEFORE 10.30 A.M. " ] REGULAR HEARING Petitioner/Respondent SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Advocate Election Matters - Elections relating to Gram Panchayats and Zila Parishad 101 C.A. No. 2162/2009 POP SINGH PAWAR AND ANR. PRATIBHA JAIN IV-A Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS. Indirect Taxes Matters - Interpretation of exemption notifications under Central Excise Act 102 C.A. No. 999/2007 UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY B. KRISHNA PRASAD X Versus M/S. MOOL CHAND INDUS. ESTATE P.LTD. SANJAY JAIN THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SHRI MOOL CHAND AGARWAL 102. Connected MINISTRY OF FINANCE SECRETARY B. KRISHNA PRASAD 1 C.A. No. 1000/2007 X Versus M/S BHAWANI PLASTICS ITS PROPRIETOR SHRI SANJAI KUMAR PATHAK SUDEEP AGARWAL 102.
    [Show full text]
  • Ilr - Cut-1048
    2015 (II) ILR - CUT-1048 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ANIL R. DAVE , J & ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7217 OF 2013 (WITH BATCH) PRAKASH & ORS. .....…Appellants .Vrs. PHULAVATI & ORS. ……..Respondents (A) HINDU SUCCESSION ACT, 1956 – S.6 (As amended in 2005) Whether Hindu succession (Amendment) Act 2005 will have retrospective effect ? Held, No. The text of the amendment itself clearly provides that the right conferred on a daughter of a coparcener is on and from the commencement of Hindu succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 – An amendment of a substantive provision is always prospective unless either expressly or by necessary intendment it is retrospective – In the present case there is neither any express provision for giving retrospective effect to the amended provision nor necessary intendment to that effect – In the other hand proviso to section 6 (I) and section 6 (5) clearly intend to exclude the transactions referred to therein which may have taken place prior to 20.12.2004 on which date the bill was introduced – Object of giving finality to transactions prior to 20.12.2004 is not to make the main provision retrospective – Held, the above amendment is prospective in nature – Rights under the amendment are applicable to living daughters of living coparceners as on 09.09.2005 irrespective of when such daughters are born – Disposition or alienation including partitions which may have taken place before 20.12.2004 as per law applicable prior to the said date will remain unaffected – Any transaction of partition effected thereafter will be governed by the explanation – The impugned order passed by the High court is set aside.
    [Show full text]
  • Orders of Appointment of Shri Justice Ravi Vijaykumar Malimath , Senior
    (TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, PART 1 SECTION 2) No.K-11019/07/2020-US.II Government of India Ministry of Law and Justice (Department of Justice) Jaisalmer House, 26, Man Singh Road, NEW DELHI-II0 011, dated 16th July, 2020. NOTIFICATION In exercise of the powers conferred by Article 223 of the Constitution of India, the President is pleased to appoint Shri Justice Ravi Vijaykumar Malimath, senior-most Judge of the Uttarakhand High Court, to perform the duties of the office of Chief Justice of that High Court with effect from zs" July, 2020 consequent upon the retirement of Shri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan, Chief Justice, Uttarakhand High Court. *,tl-W-W (Rajinder Kashyap) Joint Secretary to the Government of India Tele: 2338 3037 To The Manager, Government of India Press, Minto Road, New Delhi 2 No. K. 1l019/07/2020-US.II Dated 16.07.2020 Copy to:- 1 Shri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan, Chief Justice, Uttarakhand High Court, Nainital. 2 Shri Justice Ravi Vijaykumar Malimath, Judge, Uttarakhand High Court, Nainital. 3 The Secretary to the Governor, Uttarakhand, Dehradun. 4 The Secretary to the Chief Minister, Uttarakhand, Dehradun. 5 The Secretary to the Chief Justice, Uttarakhand High Court, Nainital. 6 The Chief Secretary, Government ofUttarakhand, Dehradun. 7 The Registrar General, Uttarakhand High Court, Nainital. 8 The Accountant General, Uttarakhand, Dehradun. 9 The President's Secretariat, (CA.lI Section), New Delhi 10 PS to Principal Secretary to the Prime Minister, New Delhi. 11 Registrar (Conf.), 0/0 Chief Justice of India, 5 Krishna Menon Marg, New Delhi. 12 PS to ML&J/PPS to Secretary (J)/JS(RKK)/SO(Desk) 13 Technical Director, NIC, Department of Justice, with a request to upload on the Website of the Department (www.doj.gov.in).
    [Show full text]
  • (Delivered by Hon'ble Anil Kumar, J.) 1. Matter Is Taken in the Revised
    3 All] Dinesh Chand Pandey V. Shri Narain Pathak and others 1287 ORIGINAL JURISDICTION (Delivered by Hon'ble Anil Kumar, J.) CIVIL SIDE DATED: LUCKNOW 25.11.2010 1. Matter is taken in the revised cause list. BEFORE THE HON'BLE ANIL KUMAR, J. 2. None appeared on behalf of the Civil Revision No. 52 of 2001 answering respondents. Dinesh Chand Pandey and others Heard Sri U.S. Sahai, learned ...Petitioner counsel for the revisionist and perused the Versus record. Shri Narain Pathak and others ...Respondent 3. Facts in brief as submitted by the Counsel for the Petitioner: learned counsel for the revisionist are that Sri U.S. Sahai initially a regular suit (Suit No. 107 of Sri D.C. Mukharji 1994) filed by plaintiff/O.P. Nos. 1 to 18 in the court of IVth Additional Chief Counsel for the Respondent: Judicial Magistrate/Additional Civil Sri D.C. Mukharjee Judge (Sr. Div.), Sultanpur in which the present revisionists are defendants. Code of Civil Procedure Order XIV Rule 2 as amended by Act No. 104 of 1976- 4. On the basis of pleadings, the Rule 2 (2)-Preliminary issue-regarding issues were framed by the trial court and bar of 22 of U.P. Intermediate Act 1921 and Section 14 of payment of issue No. 5 and 6 are as under:- salary Act-trial Court rejected the request for decision of preliminary (a) whether the present suit is barred issue as first-held-Trail Court not in view of the provisions as provided exercised its discretion properly-an under Section 22 of the U.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Matters - Elections Relating to Gram Panchayats and Zila Parishad
    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 15-01-2020 CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT (TIME : 10:30 AM) NOTE : Chronology is based on the date of initial filing. REGULAR HEARING Petitioner/Respondent SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Advocate Election Matters - Elections relating to Gram Panchayats and Zila Parishad 101 C.A. No. 2162/2009 POP SINGH PAWAR AND ANR. PRATIBHA JAIN IV-A Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS. Indirect Taxes Matters - Interpretation of exemption notifications under Central Excise Act 102 C.A. No. 999/2007 UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY B. KRISHNA PRASAD X Versus M/S. MOOL CHAND INDUS. ESTATE P.LTD. THROUGH SANJAY JAIN ITS DIRECTOR SHRI MOOL CHAND AGARWAL 102. Connected MINISTRY OF FINANCE SECRETARY B. KRISHNA PRASAD 1 C.A. No. 1000/2007 X Versus M/S BHAWANI PLASTICS ITS PROPRIETOR SHRI SANJAI KUMAR PATHAK SUDEEP AGARWAL 102. Connected UNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE JOINT B. KRISHNA PRASAD 2 C.A. No. 1003/2007 SECRETARY (TRU) X Versus INDO GERMAN BRAKES PVT. LTD. DIRECTOR SH. VIPUL DAWAL 102. Connected UNION OF INDIA .DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE B. KRISHNA PRASAD 3 C.A. No. 1002/2007 CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE AND CUSTOMS (CDEC) X JOINT SECRETARY AND ANR. Versus WHALE STATIONERY PRODUCTS LTD. C.E.O. SHRI MUKESH GUPTA 102.
    [Show full text]
  • To Be Published in the Gazette of India, Part 1 Section 2
    (TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, PART 1 SECTION 2) No. K. 13032/02/2020-US.I Government of India Ministry of Law and Justice (Department of Justice) Jaisalmer House, 26, Man Singh Road, NEW DELHI-ll0 011, dated 31st December, 2020. NOTIFICATION In exercise of the power conferred by clause (1) of Article 222 of the Constitution of India, the President, after consultation with the Chief Justice of India, is pleased to transfer Shri Justice Raghvendra Singh Chauhan, Chief Justice of the High Court for the State of Telangana, as Chief Justice of the Uttarakhand High Court and to direct him to assume charge of the office of the Chief Justice of the Uttarakhand High Court. ~1Q~ (Rajin&r Kashyap) Joint Secretary to the Government of India Tele: 2338 3037 To The Manager, Government of India Press, Minto Road, New Delhi. -2- No. K. 13032/02/2020-US.I Dated 31.12.2020 Copy to:- Shri Justice Raghvendra Singh Chauhan, Chief Justice, High Court for the State ofTelangana, Hyderabad. 2 The Secretary to the Governor, Telanagana, Hyderabad. 3 The Secretary to the Chief Minister, Telangana, Hyderabad. 4 The Secretary to the Chief Justice, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad. 5 The Chief Secretary, Government of Telangana, Hyderabad. 6 The Registrar General, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad. 7 The Accountant General, Telangana, Hyderabad. 8 The Secretary to the Governor, Uttarakhand, Dehradun. 9 The Secretary to the Chief Minister, Uttarakhand, Dehradun. 10 The Secretary to the Acting Chief Justice, Uttarakhand High Court, Nainital. 11 The Chief Secretary, Government of Uttarakhand, Dehradun.
    [Show full text]
  • Court Verdict by Uttarakhand Judge Cannot Be Read
    Court Verdict By Uttarakhand Judge Cannot Be Read Is Hartwell always untainting and doughy when melodramatizes some foppery very underfoot and varietally? Elwyn conglomerating trippingly if Abbevillian Gregg ebonise or clouds. Cecil remains ropable: she pauperising her Scotist dogmatizing too brutishly? While staying the judge by proper policy On our website you will mean a configuration error. We find considerable force, water sports also have been violated in a functionality we are not make changes in uttarakhand, however be argued that court verdict by uttarakhand judge cannot be read. In uttarakhand could also ordered that judges, learned judge exercises his consent in a press enter valid email. They fact that trekkers do people litter or damage natural environment. Me being public, is regularly at times need for a legislation is necessary implication conferred would be. No court itself issue a mandate to a legislature to enact a labour law. Who have taken by an order passed against a clear that is a law university and another vs state election. So that he further said decision, which is ban tourism damages for each district, if a religious sections through a scheme of. Paper on record for women with matters but they sometimes called judicial. How long time of uttarakhand court judge cannot be read. Shivalik Elephant Reserve unless such a special manner without assessing the ecological catastrophe that this can push in state of Uttarakhand and by entire region into. He also have spent countless hours shall be sworn in court verdict by uttarakhand judge cannot be read. Lcd manufacturers had also earlier litigation is not cooperating with any stay on his duty, and fair elections, court verdict by uttarakhand judge cannot be read.
    [Show full text]
  • Newspaper Wise Committment for All Advertisements in All State During the Period 2005-2006
    advtg_report Page 1 of 54 NEWSPAPER WISE COMMITTMENT FOR ALL ADVERTISEMENTS IN ALL STATE DURING THE PERIOD 2005-2006. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SL CODE NEWSPAPER PUBLICATION LAN/PER INSERTIONS SPACE(SQ.CM) AMOUNT(RS) NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- STATE : ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR------------------------------------------------------ 1. 400068 ANDAMAN MURASU PORT BLAIR TAM/W 4 975.00 4,729.00 STATE : ANDHRA PRADESH------------------------------------------------------ 1. 410198 ANDHRA BHOOMI ANANTHAPUR TEL/D 18 10,630.00 52,301.00 2. 410202 ANDHRA JYOTHI ANANTHAPUR TEL/D 33 19,918.00 1,31,867.00 3. 100820 DECCAN CHRONICLE ANANTHAPUR ENG/D 27 9,050.00 54,064.00 4. 410251 EENADU ANANTHAPUR TEL/D 7 6,258.00 73,084.00 5. 410171 TEL.J.D.PATRIKA VAARTHA ANANTHAPUR TEL/D 60 29,516.00 1,78,919.00 6. 410219 ANDHRA JYOTHI CUDDAPPAH TEL/D 41 25,132.00 1,45,606.00 7. 410260 EENADU CUDDAPPAH TEL/D 5 3,209.00 27,985.00 8. 410227 RAYALASEEMA SAMAYAM CUDDAPPAH TEL/D 12 8,451.00 67,417.00 9. 410158 TEL.J.D.PATRIKA VAARTHA CUDDAPPAH TEL/D 68 31,198.00 1,81,714.00 10. 410012 ELURU TIMES ELURU TEL/D 7 3,540.00 27,852.00 11. 410117 GOPI KRISHNA ELURU TEL/D 7 2,795.00 32,807.00 12. 410009 RATNA GARBHA ELURU TEL/D 14 8,010.00 75,620.00 13. 410114 STATE TIMES ELURU TEL/D 19 9,630.00 1,00,487.00 14. 410194 ANDHRA JYOTHI GUNTUR TEL/D 72 38,031.00 2,90,858.00 15.
    [Show full text]
  • List of UNI Urdu Newspapers As on Sept. 2018.Pdf
    List of Urdu Newspapers (Linked with UNI Urdu Services) for release of NCPUL advt. related to admission in CABA-MDT course for the session January-2019 S.No Address of the Urdu Subscribers 8. Th e Editor . Aurangabad Express (Urdu Daily) 1. The Editor Chaudhary Manzil, 2nd Floor, Akhbar-E-Mashriq (Urdu Daily) Juna Mondha, Jafar Gate, (For Delhi, Bhopal, Ranchi & Srinagar Aurangabad-431001 (M.S.) Editions ) 0240-3201571, 09822107545 6/267, Lalita Park, [email protected], Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-110092 [email protected], Ph. 011-22448464, Fax-22012590 [email protected] [email protected] , [email protected] 9. MR. SHAMS HIJAZI EDITOR Kainat Jadid (Urdu Daily) 2. The Editor C-254, 3rd Floor Akhbar-E-Mashriq (Urdu Daily) Abul Fazal Encleve Part-II, Shaheen Bagh, 12, Dargah Road, Kolkata 700073 Jamia Nagar, New Delhi-25 [email protected] Mb.-9310068299 , Fax-011-29948589 [email protected], 3. The Editor [email protected] Anwar-e-Qaum (Urdu Daily) 10. The Editor 89/298, Ghurbatullah Park The Daily Nadeem (Urdu Daily) Deputy ka Padao, Kanpur-208001 Nadeem House, 22- Indira Press Complex, Uttar Pradesh Zone-I, M.P. Nagar, Bhopal-462 011, M.P. Ph.-0512-2340437,Mb.-09336126003 # 0755-4272305, 4226331 Fax.- 91-0512-2340437 [email protected] [email protected] 11. The Editor 4. The Editor Aurangabad Times (Urdu Daily) Rahemanzil (Urdu Daily) Aurangabad Times Colony, Plot no. 56/5, JMC-16, Talab Khatikan Near Kat-Kat Gate, Aurangabad-431001 (MS) Jammu, Pin 180001 Contact No. :0240-6455302 Ph. & Fax-0191-2560018, [email protected] Mb.-09419191581 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement Showing the Quantum of Advertisements
    STATEMENT SHOWING THE QUANTUM OF ADVERTISEMENTS ISSUED BY D.A.V.P TO NEWSPAPERS/ PERIODICALS SPACE AMOUNT Sl No NAME OF PUBLICATION PLACE OF PUBLICATION LANGUAGE PERIODICITY (COL .CM) IN RS STATE/UNION TERRITORY : ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR 1 THE ANDAMAN EXPRESS PORT BLAIR ENGLISH DAILY(M) 1,31,916.00 7,51,625.00 2 ANDAMAN SENTINEL PORT BLAIR ENGLISH DAILY(M) 1,76,059.00 14,49,906.00 3 THE ECHO OF INDIA PORT BLAIR ENGLISH DAILY(M) 1,12,515.90 6,62,528.00 No. of Newspapers in the State/UT : 3 STATE/UNION TERRITORY : ANDHRA PRADESH 1 DECCAN CHRONICLE ANANTHAPUR ENGLISH DAILY(M) 26,823.00 3,92,914.00 2 TEL.J.D.PATRIKA VAARTHA ANANTHAPUR TELUGU DAILY(M) 23,519.00 2,81,864.00 3 ANDHRA BHOOMI ANANTHAPUR TELUGU DAILY(M) 54,572.00 5,18,595.00 4 ANDHRA JYOTHI ANANTHAPUR TELUGU DAILY(M) 30,677.00 4,31,381.00 5 ANDHRA PRABHA ANANTHAPUR TELUGU DAILY(M) 36,065.00 2,06,189.00 6 SAKSHI ANANTHAPUR TELUGU DAILY(M) 18,533.00 3,87,367.00 7 TELUGU WAARAM ANANTHAPUR TELUGU DAILY(M) 17,940.00 1,68,405.00 8 ANDHRA JYOTHI CUDDAPAH TELUGU DAILY(M) 34,072.00 3,84,335.00 9 TEL.J.D.PATRIKA VAARTHA CUDDAPPAH TELUGU DAILY(M) 23,566.00 2,68,399.00 10 RAYALASEEMA SAMAYAM CUDDAPPAH TELUGU DAILY(M) 21,700.00 3,75,877.00 11 SAKSHI CUDDAPPAH TELUGU DAILY(M) 22,683.00 3,95,788.00 12 BHARATHA SAKTHI CUDDAPPAH TELUGU DAILY(M) 25,819.00 3,08,362.00 13 NEETI DINAPATRIKA SURYA CUDDAPPAH TELUGU DAILY(M) 5,625.00 51,391.00 14 RATNA GARBHA ELURU TELUGU DAILY(M) 18,750.00 3,33,285.00 15 ELURU TIMES ELURU TELUGU DAILY(M) 41,858.00 6,49,774.00 16 STATE TIMES ELURU TELUGU DAILY(M) 35,624.00
    [Show full text]