DOCSLIB.ORG

Afghanistan 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Afghanistan 2010 F SAMPLE OF ORGANISATIONS PARTICIPATING IN CONSOLIDATED APPEALS ACF GTZ Medair Terre des Hommes ACTED Handicap International Mercy Corps UNAIDS ADRA HELP MERLIN UNDP Afghanaid HelpAge International MSF UNDSS AVSI Humedica NPA UNESCO CARE IMC NRC UNFPA CARITAS INTERSOS OCHA UN-HABITAT CONCERN IOM OHCHR UNHCR COOPI IRC OXFAM UNICEF CRS IRIN Première Urgence WFP CWS Islamic Relief Worldwide Save the Children WHO DRC LWF Solidarités World Vision International FAO MACCA TEARFUND GOAL Malteser TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................................. 1 Table I. Summary of Requirements (grouped by cluster) ..................................................................... 4 Table II. Summary of Requirements (grouped by priority) ..................................................................... 4 Table III. Summary of Requirements (grouped by appealing organization) ............................................ 5 Table IV. Summary of Requirements (grouped by location).................................................................... 7 2. 2009 IN REVIEW......................................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 CHANGES IN THE CONTEXT .......................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 HUMANITARIAN ACHIEVEMENTS AND LESSONS LEARNED................................................................................ 14 3. NEEDS ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................................................... 25 3.1 CONTEXT................................................................................................................................................. 25 3.2 HUMANITARIAN NEEDS ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................... 29 4. THE 2010 COMMON HUMANITARIAN ACTION PLAN............................................................................... 35 4.1 SCENARIOS.............................................................................................................................................. 35 4.2 STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES FOR HUMANITARIAN ACTION IN 2010........................................................................ 37 4.3 STRATEGIC MONITORING PLAN ................................................................................................................... 37 4.4 CRITERIA FOR SELECTION AND PRIORITISATION OF PROJECTS........................................................................ 40 4.5 CLUSTER/SECTOR RESPONSE PLANS .......................................................................................................... 41 4.5 A Education....................................................................................................................................... 41 4.5 B Emergency Shelter and Non-Food Items (NFI).............................................................................. 44 4.5 C Emergency Telecommunications................................................................................................... 47 4.5 D Food Security and Agriculture........................................................................................................ 47 4.5 E Health ............................................................................................................................................ 50 4.5 F Nutrition ......................................................................................................................................... 53 4.5 G Protection ...................................................................................................................................... 55 4.5 H Water, Sanitation and Hygiene ...................................................................................................... 59 4.5 I Multi-sector .................................................................................................................................... 62 4.6 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.................................................................................................................... 64 5. CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................................................. 65 ANNEX I. LIST OF PROJECTS..................................................................................................................... 66 Table V. Appeal projects grouped by cluster (with hyperlinks to open full project details) ................... 66 Table VI. Summary of requirements (grouped by IASC standard sector) ............................................. 71 ANNEX II. DONOR RESPONSE TO 2009 APPEAL .................................................................................. 72 ANNEX III. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................................... 83 Please note that appeals are revised regularly. The latest version of this document is available on http://www.humanitarianappeal.net. Full project details can be viewed, downloaded and printed from www.reliefweb.int/fts. ii i AFGHANISTAN - Reference Map Khujand Navoiy Farg'ona Jizzax Batken Bukhara Samarqand KYRGYZSTAN UZBEKISTAN CHINA Türkmenabat (Chardzhou) Qarshi TAJIKISTA N DUSHANBE TURKMENISTAN A mu Murghob Da rya Qurghonteppa Mary Kerki Tedzhen Bayram-Ali Te rme z Khorugh Dushak Iolotan Keleft Fayzabad ir JAWZJAN Kunduz am Mazari Sharif Ta lu q an P Sheberghan 1 BADAKHSHAN *Jammu TA K HA R and Faizabad BALKH Kashmir Takhta Bazar Meymaneh Samangan Baghlan Sari Pul Gilgit Almar (Aybak) BAGHLAN SAMANGAN Bala FARYAB Dowshi 2 Torbat-e Jam Gushgi Morghab SARI PUL Bazarak 3 Towraghondi Nuristan Taybad BADGHIS Bamyan Charikar 4 KUNAR Do Ab Qala-I-Naw 5 Asadabad 6 7 Mahmud Hirat Karokh Chaghcharan BAMYAN Raqi Mehtarlam H Gunabad KABUL Muzaffarabad ar Jalalabad Mardan rud GHOR Meydan Shahr Srinagar Owbeh DAY Panjab NANGARHAR WA RDA K Nowshera HIRAT Masjed KUNDI Puli Alam Peshawar ISLAMABAD Negar LOGAR Punch nd Ghazni Teyvareh Nili a Gardez Rawalpindi Shindand lm Kohat He GHAZNI PAKTYA 8 Khost Jhelum AFGHANISTAN Qarah Bagh Jammu Uruzgan Moqor Sharan Bannu Talagang t ru FARAH URUZGAN a Farah Mianwali H Lakki Now Deh Khormaleq Kajak Tirin Kot ZABUL Monari h PAKTIKA Delaram s Sargodha ra a u Shekhupura F d Qalat n Lowkhi Gereshk Dera Ismail Khan I Chiniot h Lyallpur as Lahore Kh Lashkar Gah Kandahar Jhang Sadar Zhob Jaranwala Zaranj Zabol HILMAND Spin Buldak Leiah Okara NIMROZ Kamalia Firozpur Taunsa Sahiwal Muktsar Taghaz KANDAHAR Kawas Mian Channun Chehar Loralai Deh Shu Borjak Khanewal Abohar Quetta Dera Ghazi Khan Multan Ganganagar Zahedan Bahawalpur Sibi INDIA Ahmadpur East PA KISTA N Sardarshahr Rahimyar ISLAMIC Jacobabad 0100200 REPUBLIC Shikarpur OF IRAN km Larkana Legend Elevation (meters) National capital 5,000 and above Provincial capital 4,000 - 5,000 Populated place 3,000 - 4,000 International boundary 2,500 - 3,000 Provincial boundary 2,000 - 2,500 Provinces 1,500 - 2,000 1,000 - 1,500 1. Kunduz, 2. Panisher, 3. Nuristan, 4. Kapisa, 5. Laghman, 6. Parwan, 7. Kabul, 8. Khost 800 - 1,000 600 - 800 Disclaimers: The designations employed and the presentation of material on this map do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of 400 - 600 its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. 200 - 400 *Dotted line represents approximately the Line of Control in Jammu & Kashmir agreed upon by India and Pakistan. The final status of Jammu & Kashmir has not yet been 0 - 200 agreed upon by the parties. Map data sources: CGIAR, United Nations Cartographic Section, ESRI, Europa Below sea level Technologies, UN OCHA. iv AFGHANISTAN 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Decades of war and an escalating conflict, combined with frequent earthquakes and seasonal hazards such as drought, landslides, extreme winters and floods have left the majority of people in Afghanistan extremely vulnerable. The 2010 Humanitarian Action Plan (HAP) aims to improve the coordination of humanitarian programming and activities by identifying, prioritising and addressing the most acute needs in Afghanistan. It is based on a thorough analysis of the social, political and security context, and an in-depth humanitarian needs assessment. Projects and priorities included in the HAP underwent a comprehensive peer-review vetting process in line with detailed criteria, which was led by OCHA at regional, cluster and Humanitarian Country Team (HCT) levels, before final endorsement by the Humanitarian Coordinator. This document represents the HCT’s best judgement of the priorities and needs within the complex situation that is Afghanistan today. The ongoing and escalating conflict, with incident Afghanistan Humanitarian Action Plan: levels rising 30 to 35% from 2008 to 2009, has had Key parameters an increasingly harmful impact on the population 12 months (January – while simultaneously restricting humanitarian space. Duration: December 2010) Less than 40% of the country is categorised as a Planting seasons: ‘low-risk/permissive environment.’ Attacks on Key Winter: October humanitarian actors have remained constant despite milestones in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sunday, 06 October 2019 Venue: FAO Meeting Room Draft Agenda
    Time: 14:00 – 15:30 hrs Date: Sunday, 06 October 2019 Venue: FAO Meeting Room Draft Agenda: Introduction of ANDMA Nangarhar Newly appointed Director Update on the current humanitarian situation in Nurgal (Kunar) and Surkhrod (Nangarhar) – DoRR, OCHA Petition from Surkhrod for Tents and IDPs left of assessment Update on the status of Joint Needs Assessment & Response – OCHA and Partners Petitions for IDPs from Laghman AOB www.unocha.org The mission of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) is to mobilize and coordinate effective and principled humanitarian action in partnership with national and international actors. Coordination Saves Lives Update on Assessment & Response on Natural disasters – as of 21 April 2019 - IOM & ANDMA Deaths In Responde Province Districts Affected & Initial Info. # of Families Agencies Agencies Response Assistance Action Points j Status Assessed Families ured Assessed Assessed Responde Provided Affected d d Nangarhar 250 (1817 9 5 250 and 105 IOM, IMC, IOM, Ongoing NFI, Tents, -Health MHT will be deployed Assessment individuals) Assessment ongoing WFP, SCI, effective 23 April 2019.4.22, completed in Lalpur, NCRO, Pending: food, Kama, Rodat, Behsud, OXFAM, -WASH cluster will reassess the Jalalabad city, Goshta, RRD, ARCS, needs and respond accordingly. Mohmandara, Kot, Bati DACAAR, Kot DAIL, DA -IOM to share the list of families recommended for permanent Assessment ongoing: shelter with ACTED. Shirzad, Dehbala, Pachir- Agam, -ANDMA will clarify the land Chaparhar,
    [Show full text]
  • End of Year Report (2018) About Mujahideen Progress and Territory Control
    End of year report (2018) about Mujahideen progress and territory control: The Year of Collapse of Trump’s Strategy 2018 was a year that began with intense bombardments, military operations and propaganda by the American invaders but all praise belongs to Allah, it ended with the neutralization of another enemy strategy. The Mujahideen defended valiantly, used their chests as shields against enemy onslaughts and in the end due to divine assistance, the invaders were forced to review their war strategy. This report is based on precise data collected from concerned areas and verified by primary sources, leaving no room for suspicious or inaccurate information. In the year 2018, a total of 10638 attacks were carried out by Mujahideen against invaders and their hirelings from which 31 were martyr operations which resulted in the death of 249 US and other invading troops and injuries to 153 along with death toll of 22594 inflicted on Kabul administration troops, intelligence operatives, commandos, police and Arbakis with a further 14063 sustaining injuries. Among the fatalities 514 were enemy commanders killed and eliminated in various attacks across the country. During 2018 a total of 3613 vehicles including APCs, pickup trucks and other variants were destroyed along with 26 aircrafts including 8 UAVs, 17 helicopters of foreign and internal forces and 1 cargo plane shot down. Moreover, a total of 29 district administration centers were liberated by the Mujahideen of Islamic Emirate over the course of last year, among which some were retained
    [Show full text]
  • Council of Jihadi Party Launched in Kabul
    Add: V-137, Street-6, Phase, 4, District 6, Add: V-137, Street-6, Phase, 4, District 6, Shahrak Omed Sabz, Kabul Shahrak Omed Sabz, Kabul Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Phone: 0093 (799) 005019/777-005019 Phone: 0093 (799) 005019/777-005019 www.outlookafghanistan.net www.thedailyafghanistan.com Back Page August 29, 2015 Ghazni Kandahar Jalalabad Clear Clear Clear Mazar Clear Herat Clear Bamayan Clear Kabul Clear Daily Outlook 39°C 30°C 37°C 32°C 31°C 21°C 31°C Weather 24°C 13°C 19°C 22°C 14°C 7°C 15°C Forcast Maidan Wardak PC Members, Governor Pledge Council of Jihadi Party to Resolve Problems MAIDAN CITY - Provincial immediate solution. Council (PC) members in cen- Most of the schools, he said tral Maidan Wardak province had no buildings while some Launched in Kabul on Thursday discussed at needed reconstruction. In ad- KABUL - Afghanistan’s former presi- “The party is totally independent length administrative, judi- dition, he said that children dent Sebghatullah Mojaddedi on and has no links to government or cial and other provincial is- of dozens of schools were in Thursday announced the establish- any foreign countries,” said Khalili. sues with the governor who dire need of textbooks. ment of a new political party – the The party said that they will support pledged to extend all coop- PC members also pointed Council of Jihadi – which aims to put the National Unity Government but eration to resolve problem of out lack of electricity facilities pressure on the National Unity Gov- will also oppose it if necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Development Programs Counter Insurgencies?: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Afghanistan1
    Can Development Programs Counter Insurgencies?: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Afghanistan1 Andrew Beath∗ Fotini Christia† Ruben Enikolopov‡ December 29, 2017 We exploit a randomized controlled trial conducted between 2007 and 2011 to understand the effect of Afghanistan’s largest development program on insurgency. We find that the program generally reduced insurgent violence, improved economic outcomes, and increased support for the government. However, in areas close to the Pakistani border, the program increased insurgent violence. This effect heterogeneity appears to be driven by the presence of foreign insurgents who are not reliant on the local population for support. The results suggest that while development programs can quell locally-based insurgencies, they may be counterproductive where insurgents are not embedded in the population. JEL: D74, F35, I38, O15, O18, O19. Keywords: conflict; development; aid; field experiment; Afghanistan 1 An earlier version of this paper was circulated with the title “Winning Hearts and Minds: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Afghanistan.” We thank Hamid Gharibzada, Chad Hazlett, Mohammed Isaqzadeh, Shahim Kabuli, Cullen Nutt, Maiwand Siddiqi, and Stephen Wittels for excellent research assistance; Andrew Shaver and Austin Wright for sharing data on security incidents; Jacob Shapiro for facilitating access to the data; and Jason Lyall for sharing an earlier version of the data. We acknowledge the cooperation and guidance provided by: Tariq Ismati and Abdul Rahman Ayubi, formerly of the National Solidarity Programme; Wais Barmak and Ehsan Zia, former Ministers of Rural Rehabilitation and Development for the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan (GIRA); staff of AfghanAid, C.H.A., InterCooperation, IRC, NPO/RRRAA, Oxfam UK, and People-in-Need; and Philippe Dongier, Susanne Holste, Dean Jolliffe, Zishan Karim, Elliot Mghenyi, Norman Piccioni, and Mio Takada of the World Bank.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Operations in Sherzad District 25.63M
    AFGHANISTAN Weekly Humanitarian Update (27 January – 2 February 2020) KEY FIGURES IDPS IN 2020 (AS OF 02 FEB) 4,400 People displaced by conflict 9,500 Received assistance NATURAL DISASTER IN 2020 (AS OF 02 FEB) 3,360 Number of people affected by natural disasters Conflict incident RETURNEES IN 2020 (AS OF 30 JAN) 23,000 Internal displacement Returnees from Iran Disruption of services 600 Returnees from Pakistan 2,400 Returnees from other countries Northeast: Fighting and military operations affect HRP REQUIREMENTS & FUNDING access and result in several deaths 733M Requirements (US$) – HRP 2020 The security and humanitarian access situation remained uncertain due to localized skirmishes between the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) 612M and a Non-State Armed Group (NSAG) around Kunduz city and main roads Requirements (US$) – HRP 2019 affecting four provinces. Military activities, NSAG attacks on ANSF positions, 463M clearing operations and house to house searches were also reported. Airstrikes in Wazirkhan village of Dasht-e-Archi district in Kunduz reportedly 75% funded (US$) in 2019 resulted in 5 deaths (2 women, 1 child and 2 men). AFGHANISTAN HUMANITARIAN Road connections between Kunduz and other provincial capital cities were FUND (AHF) 2020 reportedly severely impeded. Following a needs assessment of internally displaced persons (IDPs), 31 new IDP families (217 people) were identified to 17.6M be eligible for humanitarian assistance in Baghlan. Overall, 11,739 people Pledges (US$) received humanitarian assistance in Badakhshan, Takhar, and Baghlan 0 provinces. Expenditure (US$) East: Military operations in Sherzad District 25.63M Available for allocation, including displaced some 3,500 people carry-over (US$) Military operations in Sherzad District, Nangarhar province reportedly displaced of 500 families (approximately 3,500 people) to several locations within Sherzad District, Chamtala in Khogyani District, Surkhrod/Behsud districts and Jalalabad City.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan Cannabis Survey 2009
    Government of Afghanistan Ministry of Counter Narcotics Vienna International Centre, PO Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel.: (+43-1) 26060-0, Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5866, www.unodc.org Afghanistan cannabis survey 2009 April 2010 United Nations publication FOR UNITED NATIONS USE ONLY ISBN ???-??-?-??????-? ISSN ????-???? Sales No. T.08.XI.7 Printed in Austria ST/NAR.3/2007/1 (E/NA) job no.—Date—copies Afghanistan Cannabis Survey 2009 ABBREVIATIONS ANDS Afghanistan National Drug Strategy AOPS Annual Opium Poppy Survey CNPA Counter Narcotics Police of Afghanistan ICMP Illicit Crop Monitoring Programme (UNODC) MCN Ministry of Counter-Narcotics UNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following organizations and individuals contributed to the implementation of the 2009 Afghanistan Cannabis Survey and to the preparation of this report: Ministry of Counter-Narcotics: Dr. Mohammad Zafar (Deputy Minister), Mohammad Ibrahim Azhar (Deputy Minister) Dr. Mohammad Nabi Hussaini (Director General), Policy &Coordination, Mir Abdullah (Deputy Director of Survey and Monitoring Directorate) Survey Coordinators: Eshaq Masumi (Central Region), Abdul Mateen (Eastern Region), Abdul Latif Ehsan (Western Region), Fida Mohammad (Northern Region), Mohammed Ishaq Anderabi (North-Eastern Region), Hashmatullah Asek (Southern Region) Mohammad Khyber Wardak (Data entry supervisor), Mohammad Ajmal (Data entry), Sahar (Data entry), Mohammad Hakim Hayat (Data entry). United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (Afghanistan, Kabul) Jean-Luc Lemahieu (Country
    [Show full text]
  • AIHRC-UNAMA Joint Monitoring of Political Rights Presidential and Provincial Council Elections Third Report 1 August – 21 October 2009
    Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission AIHRC AIHRC-UNAMA Joint Monitoring of Political Rights Presidential and Provincial Council Elections Third Report 1 August – 21 October 2009 United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan UNAMA Table of Contents Summary of Findings i Introduction 1 I. Insecurity and Intimidation 1 Intensified violence and intimidation in the lead up to elections 1 Insecurity on polling day 2 II. Right to Vote 2 Insecurity and voting 3 Relocation or merging of polling centres and polling stations 4 Women’s participation 4 III. Fraud and Irregularities 5 Ballot box stuffing 6 Campaigning at polling stations and instructing voters 8 Multiple voter registration cards 8 Proxy voting 9 Underage voting 9 Deficiencies 9 IV. Freedom of Expression 9 V. Conclusion 10 Endnotes 11 Annex 1 – ECC Policy on Audit and Recount Evaluations 21 Summary of Findings The elections took place in spite of a challenging environment that was characterised by insecurity and logistical and human resource difficulties. These elections were the first to be fully led and organised by the Afghanistan Independent Election Commission (IEC) and the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) took the lead in providing security for the elections. It was also the first time that arrangements were made for prisoners and hospitalised citizens, to cast their votes. The steady increase of security-related incidents by Anti-Government Elements (AGEs) was a dominant factor in the preparation and holding of the elections. Despite commendable efforts from the ANSF, insecurity had a bearing on the decision of Afghans to participate in the elections Polling day recorded the highest number of attacks and other forms of intimidation for some 15 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Florian Weigand Afghanistan’S Taliban – Legitimate Jihadists Or Coercive Extremists?
    Florian Weigand Afghanistan’s Taliban – legitimate jihadists or coercive extremists? Article (Published version) (Refereed) Original citation: Weigand, Florian (2017) Afghanistan’s Taliban – legitimate jihadists or coercive extremists? Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding. ISSN 1750-2977 DOI: 10.1080/17502977.2017.1353755 Reuse of this item is permitted through licensing under the Creative Commons: © 2017 The Author CC BY 4.0 This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/83461/ Available in LSE Research Online: August 2017 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding ISSN: 1750-2977 (Print) 1750-2985 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/risb20 Afghanistan’s Taliban – Legitimate Jihadists or Coercive Extremists? Florian Weigand To cite this article: Florian Weigand (2017): Afghanistan’s Taliban – Legitimate Jihadists or Coercive Extremists?, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, DOI: 10.1080/17502977.2017.1353755 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2017.1353755 © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 07 Aug 2017. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 287 View related articles View Crossmark
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT 01—15 September 2011 Index COUNTRY SUMMARY Central Region 1-6 Countrywide, Opposition Initiated Attacks Popular New District Governor
    CONFIDENTIAL— NGO use only No copy, forward or sale © INSO 2011 issue 81 REPORT 01—15 September 2011 Index COUNTRY SUMMARY Central Region 1-6 Countrywide, opposition initiated attacks popular new district governor. North Region 7-11 returned to normal pre-Ramadan levels In the EASTERN REGION, NGOs in 12-15 East Region after a brief hiatus for Eid during which the Nangahar were victimised by robbers in weekly attack rate dropped by a half. Pachir Wa Agam; by armed criminals in South Region 16-20 In the CENTRAL REGION, the multi- Bati Kot and collaterally by IMF SAF in West Region 21-23 vector attack in Kabul on September 13/14 Chaparhar with thankfully no injuries re- ANSO Info Page 24 did not demonstrate anything new in tacti- sulting from any case. Elsewhere, the Sher- cal terms—or change the NGO risk profile zad District Governor was killed in a road- within the city specifically—but it was a side IED strike. In Gardez, Paktya an significant indicator of how little progress NGO clinic was inexplicably vandalized HIGHLIGHTS there has been in the COIN objective of and burnt by suspected Waziristani AOGs AOG attack rates climb protecting Afghan civilians, even in the while in Laghman unidentified armed men capital city. ANSO also found it notable abducted up to eight civilians at illegal High profile attack disrupts that leading political and military commen- roadblocks. In Nuristan, AOGs retain con- Kabul tators described the attack as an effort to trol of Waygal and seriously threaten Bargi High yield SVBIED targets ―derail transition‖ when in reality transition Matal.
    [Show full text]
  • AFGHANISTAN Northeast
    AFGHANISTAN Weekly Humanitarian Update (3 February – 9 February 2020) KEY FIGURES IDPS IN 2020 (AS OF 9 FEB) 4,400 People displaced by conflict 9,500 Received assistance NATURAL DISASTER IN 2020 (AS OF 9 FEB) 16,300 Number of people affected by natural disasters Conflict incident RETURNEES IN 2020 (AS OF 1 FEB) 29,200 Internal displacement Returnees from Iran Disruption of services 680 Returnees from Pakistan 3,150 Returnees from other countries Northeast: Over 3,000 people received HRP REQUIREMENTS & FUNDING humanitarian assistance 733M Requirements (US$) – HRP 2020 Reports surfaced of an airstrike impacting a school and a clinic in the Baghi Shirkat area of Kunduz province during last week’s fighting between the 612M Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) and a Non-State Armed Group Requirements (US$) – HRP 2019 (NSAG). 464.4M Since 3 February, an unknown respiratory illness killed 14 children in five 80% funded (US$) in 2019 villages in the Ushnugan area (Yamgan district, Badakhshan province). Last week, 3,535 people affected by conflict received humanitarian assistance AFGHANISTAN HUMANITARIAN in Baghlan and Kunduz provinces. Moreover, 455 internally displaced persons FUND (AHF) 2020 (IDPs) affected by conflict were assessed and will receive assistance in the 17.6M coming days in Baghlan province. Pledges (US$) East: Fighting displaced 6,400 people in Nangahar 0 Expenditure (US$) and Laghman 25.63M Approximately, 5,600 people were displaced during fighting between the Available for allocation, including ANSF and an NSAG in Sherzad district, Nangarhar province and 800 people carry-over (US$) were displaced in Alishang and Alingar districts in Laghman province.
    [Show full text]
  • The Islamic State, the Taliban, and Afghanistan's White
    THE ISLAMIC STATE, THE TALIBAN, AND AFGHANISTAN’S WHITE TALC MOUNTAINS MAY 2018 With sincere thanks to all those whose help made this report possible 2 “AT ANY PRICE WE WILL TAKE THE MINES” | MAY 2018 Contents Summary 4 Recommendations to the Afghan government, President and Chief Executive 6 Box: Key actors 7 Recommendations to Afghanistan’s international partners 8 1. Introduction 10 Box: Unglamorous conflict minerals – talc, chromite and marble 11 2. The Islamic State in Afghanistan: a complex threat 12 An important affiliate 12 A well-resourced insurgency 12 Stalled but dangerous 14 3. The threat on the ground: ISKP’s hold on the mines of Nangarhar 16 Riches in their hands: the resources ISKP controls in Achin 16 A more intense exploitation? 18 A tighter grip 19 Contradictory evidence 21 Smuggling routes? 22 The satellite evidence: extensive mining, but recent activity unclear 22 The Shadal stockpile 26 So how much mining? 27 4. A strategic interest 28 The bigger picture 28 “The fight is over the mines” 28 Box: ISIS and extractives in Iraq and Syria 28 5. ISKP and mining beyond Nangarhar 30 Paktia and Logar 30 Other provinces 30 6. “The Islamic State are crueller” – ISKP and human rights abuses 33 “AT ANY PRICE WE WILL TAKE THE MINES” | MAY 2018 3 7. Not just ISKP: the Taliban and other armed groups 34 The Taliban and mining: Achin 34 The Taliban and mining: elsewhere in Nangarhar 34 Supporting Sources 37 Millions in mining revenue to the Taliban 38 A problem across Afghanistan 38 8. Implicating us all: supply chains and corruption 40 Government corruption 40 The link to international markets 42 European multinationals and the talc trade 43 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Counter-Narcotics Efforts and Their Effects in Nangarhar and Helmand in the 2010-11 Growing Season
    Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit Case Study Series Between a Rock and a Hard Place Counter-narcotics efforts and their effects in Nangarhar and Helmand in the 2010-11 growing season David Mansfield August 2011 European Commission Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit Case Study Series BETWEEN A ROCK AND A HARD PLACE Counter-narcotics efforts and their effects in Nangarhar and Helmand in the 2010-11 growing season David Mansfield Funding for this research was provided by the October 2011 European Commission Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit Editing and Layout: Oliver Lough AREU Publication Code: 1128E © 2011 Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of AREU. Some rights reserved. This publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted only for non- commercial purposes and with written credit to AREU and the author. Where this publication is reproduced, stored or transmitted electronically, a link to AREU’s website (www.areu.org.af) should be provided. Any use of this publication falling outside of these permissions requires prior written permission of the publisher, the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit. Permission can be sought by emailing [email protected] or by calling +93 (0) 799 608 548. Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Counter-narcotics efforts and their effects in Nangarhar and Helmand in the 2010-11 growing season Aboout the Author David Mansfield is an independent consultant who has undertaken fieldwork on the role of opium poppy in rural livelihoods in Afghanistan for 14 consecutive growing seasons.
    [Show full text]