DOCSLIB.ORG

Why Open Source Software / Free Software (OSS/FS, FLOSS, Or FOSS)? Look at the Numbers! 1. Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Why Open Source Software / Free Software (OSS/FS, FLOSS, Or FOSS)? Look at the Numbers! 1. Introduction Why Open Source Software / Free Software (OSS/FS, FOSS, or FLOSS)? Look at the Nu...Page 1 of 139 Translations available: Czech | French | Japanese | Spanish Why Open Source Software / Free Software (OSS/FS, FLOSS, or FOSS)? Look at the Numbers! David A. Wheeler http://www.dwheeler.com/contactme.html Revised as of November 14, 2005 This paper provides quantitative data that, in many cases, using open source software / free software (abbreviated as OSS/FS, FLOSS, or FOSS) is a reasonable or even superior approach to using their proprietary competition according to various measures. This paper’s goal is to show that you should consider using OSS/FS when acquiring software. This paper examines market share, reliability, performance, scalability, security, and total cost of ownership. It also has sections on non-quantitative issues, unnecessary fears, OSS/FS on the desktop, usage reports, governments and OSS/FS, other sites providing related information, and ends with some conclusions. An appendix gives more background information about OSS/FS. You can view this paper at http://www.dwheeler.com/oss_fs_why.html (HTML format). A short presentation (briefing) based on this paper is also available. Palm PDA users may wish to use Plucker to view this longer report. Old archived copies and a list of changes are also available. 1. Introduction Open Source Software / Free Software (OSS/FS) (also abbreviated as FLOSS or FOSS) has risen to great prominence. Briefly, OSS/FS programs are programs whose licenses give users the freedom to run the program for any purpose, to study and modify the program, and to redistribute copies of either the original or modified program (without having to pay royalties to previous developers). The goal of this paper is to convince you to consider using OSS/FS when you’re looking for software, using quantitive measures. Some sites provide a few anecdotes on why you should use OSS/FS, but for many that’s not enough information to justify using OSS/FS. Instead, this paper emphasizes quantitative measures (such as experiments and market studies) to justify why using OSS/FS products is in many circumstances a reasonable or even superior approach. I should note that while I find much to like about OSS/FS, I’m not a rabid advocate; I use both proprietary and OSS/FS products myself. Vendors of proprietary products often work hard to find numbers to support their claims; this page provides a useful antidote of hard figures to aid in comparing proprietary products to OSS/FS. I believe that this paper has met its goal; others seem to think so too. The 2004 report of the California Performance Review, a report from the state of California, urges that “the state should more extensively consider use of open source software”, and specifically references this paper. A review at the Canadian Open Source Education and Research (CanOpenER) site stated “This is an excellent look at the some of the reasons why any organisation should consider the use of [OSS/FS]... [it] does a wonderful job of bringing the facts and figures of real usage comparisons and how the figures are arrived at. No FUD or paid for industry reports here, just the facts”. This paper been referenced by many other works, too. It’s my hope that you’ll find it useful as well. http://www.dwheeler.com/oss_fs_why.html 11/16/2006 Why Open Source Software / Free Software (OSS/FS, FOSS, or FLOSS)? Look at the Nu...Page 2 of 139 The following subsections describe the paper’s scope, challenges in creating it, the paper’s terminology, and the bigger picture. This is followed by a description of the rest of the paper’s organization (listing the sections such as market share, reliability, performance, scalability, security, and total cost of ownership). Those who find this paper interesting may also be interested in the other documents available on David A. Wheeler’s personal home page. 1.1 Scope As noted above, the goal of this paper is to convince you to consider using OSS/FS when you’re looking for software, using quantitive measures. Note that this paper’s goal is not to show that all OSS/FS is better than all proprietary software. Certainly, there are many who believe this is true from ethical, moral, or social grounds. It’s true that OSS/FS users have fundamental control and flexibility advantages, since they can modify and maintain their own software to their liking. And some countries perceive advantages to not being dependent on a sole-source company based in another country. However, no numbers could prove the broad claim that OSS/FS is always “better” (indeed you cannot reasonably use the term “better” until you determine what you mean by it). Instead, I’ll simply compare commonly-used OSS/FS software with commonly-used proprietary software, to show that at least in certain situations and by certain measures, some OSS/FS software is at least as good or better than its proprietary competition. Of course, some OSS/FS software is technically poor, just as some proprietary software is technically poor. And remember -- even very good software may not fit your specific needs. But although most people understand the need to compare proprietary products before using them, many people fail to even consider OSS/FS products, or they create policies that unnecessarily inhibit their use; those are errors this paper tries to correct. This paper doesn’t describe how to evaluate particular OSS/FS programs; a companion paper describes how to evaluate OSS/FS programs. This paper also doesn’t explain how an organization would transition to an OSS/FS approach if one is selected. Other documents cover transition issues, such as The Interchange of Data between Adminisrations (IDA) Open Source Migration Guidelines (November 2003) and the German KBSt’s Open Source Migration Guide (July 2003) (though both are somewhat dated). Organizations can transition to OSS/FS in part or in stages, which for many is a more practical transition approach. I’ll emphasize the operating system (OS) known as GNU/Linux (which many abbreviate as “Linux”), the Apache web server, the Mozilla Firefox web browser, and the OpenOffice.org office suite, since these are some of the most visible OSS/FS projects. I’ll also primarily compare OSS/FS software to Microsoft’s products (such as Windows and IIS), since Microsoft Windows has a significant market share and Microsoft is one of proprietary software’s strongest proponents. Note, however, that even Microsoft makes and uses OSS/FS themselves (they have even sold software using the GNU GPL license, as discussed below). I’ll mention Unix systems as well, though the situation with Unix is more complex; today’s Unix systems include many OSS/FS components or software primarily derived from OSS/FS components. Thus, comparing proprietary Unix systems to OSS/FS systems (when examined as whole systems) is often not as clear-cut. This paper uses the term “Unix-like” to mean systems intentionally similar to Unix; both Unix and GNU/Linux are “Unix-like” systems. The most recent Apple Macintosh OS (MacOS OS X) presents the same kind of complications; older versions of MacOS were wholly proprietary, but Apple’s OS has been redesigned so that it’s now based on a Unix system with substantial contributions from OSS/FS programs. Indeed, Apple is now openly encouraging collaboration with OSS/FS developers. http://www.dwheeler.com/oss_fs_why.html 11/16/2006 Why Open Source Software / Free Software (OSS/FS, FOSS, or FLOSS)? Look at the Nu...Page 3 of 139 1.2 Challenges It’s a challenge to write any paper like this; measuring anything is always difficult, for example. Most of these figures are from other works, and it was difficult to find many of them. But there are two special challenges that you should be aware of: legal problems in publishing data, and dubious studies (typically those funded by a product vendor). Many proprietary software product licenses include clauses that forbid public criticism of the product without the vendor’s permission. Obviously, there’s no reason that such permission would be granted if a review is negative -- such vendors can ensure that any negative comments are reduced and that harsh critiques, regardless of their truth, are never published. This significantly reduces the amount of information available for unbiased comparisons. Reviewers may choose to change their report so it can be published (omitting important negative information), or not report at all -- in fact, they might not even start the evaluation. Some laws, such as UCITA (a law in Maryland and Virginia), specifically enforce these clauses forbidding free speech, and in many other locations the law is unclear -- making researchers bear substantial legal risk that these clauses might be enforced. These legal risks have a chilling effect on researchers, and thus makes it much harder for customers to receive complete unbiased information. This is not merely a theoretical problem; these license clauses have already prevented some public critique, e.g., Cambridge researchers reported that they were forbidden to publish some of their benchmarked results of VMWare ESX Server and Connectix/Microsoft Virtual PC. Oracle has had such clauses for years. Hopefully these unwarranted restraints of free speech will be removed in the future. But in spite of these legal tactics to prevent disclosure of unbiased data, there is still some publicly available data, as this paper shows. This paper omits or at least tries to warn about studies funded by a product’s vendor, which have a fundamentally damaging conflict of interest. Remember that vendor-sponsored studies are often rigged (no matter who the vendor is) to make the vendor look good instead of being fair comparisons.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Virtual Machine Technologies and Their Application in the Delivery of ICT
    Virtual Machine Technologies and Their Application In The Delivery Of ICT William McEwan accq.ac.nz n Christchurch Polytechnic Institute of Technology Christchurch, New Zealand [email protected] ABSTRACT related areas - a virtual machine or network of virtual machines can be specially configured, allowing an Virtual Machine (VM) technology was first ordinary user supervisor rights, and it can be tested implemented and developed by IBM to destruction without any adverse effect on the corporation in the early 1960's as a underlying host system. mechanism for providing multi-user facilities This paper hopes to also illustrate how VM in a secure mainframe computing configurations can greatly reduce our dependency on environment. In recent years the power of special purpose, complex, and expensive laboratory personal computers has resulted in renewed setups. It also suggests the important additional role interest in the technology. This paper begins that VM and VNL is likely to play in offering hands-on by describing the development of VM. It practical experience to students in a distance e- discusses the different approaches by which learning environment. a VM can be implemented, and it briefly considers the advantages and disadvantages Keywords: Virtual Machines, operating systems, of each approach. VM technology has proven networks, e-learning, infrastructure, server hosting. to be extremely useful in facilitating the Annual NACCQ, Hamilton New Zealand July, 2002 www. Annual NACCQ, Hamilton New Zealand July, teaching of multiple operating systems. It th offers an alternative to the traditional 1. INTRODUCTION approaches of using complex combinations Virtual Machine (VM) technology is not new. It was of specially prepared and configured OS implemented on mainframe computing systems by the images installed via the network or installed IBM Corporation in the early 1960’s (Varian 1997 pp permanently on multiple partitions or on 3-25, Gribben 1989 p.2, Thornton 2000 p.3, Sugarman multiple physical hard drives.
    [Show full text]
  • Sourcefire White Paper
    And Its Role in the Security Model www.sourcefire.com June 2002 Sourcefire, Inc. 7095 Samuel Morse Drive Suite 100 Columbia, MD 21046 410.290.1616 | 410.290.0024 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................................2 Open Source Software: OSS...........................................................................................3 What is OSS?..........................................................................................................................3 History.....................................................................................................................................4 Opinions on OSS.....................................................................................................................4 Arguments in favor of OSS ......................................................................................................5 Security, Stability, and Cost .......................................................................................................................5 Standards, Immediacy, and Lack of Restrictions......................................................................................7 Arguments Against OSS..........................................................................................................7 Status Quo and Security.............................................................................................................................8 Poor Packaging and Support .....................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • CASE STUDY Userful Multiplier and Win4lin Pro Reduce Costs of Point
    CASE STUDY TM Userful Multiplier and Win4Lin Pro Reduce Costs of Point-of-Sale Terminals A Case Study by Omni Technology Solutions, leverage the Linux Desktop, he recommended the Userful a Userful Partner Multiplier*, a software add-on that allows multiple users to share a single computer. Win4Lin Pro Desktop was installed to allow Birchwood to run Simply Accounting on Linux. “Userful Multiplier* cut the hardware DOSEMU, which comes bundled with SUSE Linux, handled costs in half and Win4Lin Pro Desktop the DOS-based Framer’s Assistant point-of-sale application provided Windows compatibility to run quite nicely. their Simply Accounting package.” “Birchwood Art Gallery was always running into virus and - Mike Ducharme, spyware infections when they were using Windows 98 and IT consultant, Windows XP. Even with up-to-date anti-virus and anti- Birchwood Art Gallery spyware software, the systems were still getting major infections on a monthly basis, resulting in costly down-time Overview until they were cleaned up,” said Mr. Ducharme. “The security of Novell’s SUSE Linux Desktop provides peace of mind to Birchwood Art Gallery - based in Winnipeg, Canada - their staff,” continued Ducharme, “allowing them to carry out specializes in fine art reproductions and original artwork their work activities without fear of virus or spyware infesta- by a wide range of Canadian and international artists. On tion. Additionally, the Userful Multiplier* cut the hardware their web site and in their gallery, you will find artwork, costs in half and Win4Lin Pro Desktop provided Windows sculptures, prints and books from hundreds of artists. Lyn compatibility to run their Simply Accounting package.” Chercoe and Carole Solmundson, Birchwood Art Gallery’s owners, have earned a reputation for customer service The Results excellence since 1993 and sell art online all over the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Bastian Ballmann Attack and Defense with Python 3 2Nd Edition
    Bastian Ballmann Understanding Network Hacks Attack and Defense with Python 3 2nd Edition Understanding Network Hacks Bastian Ballmann Understanding Network Hacks Attack and Defense with Python 3 2nd Edition Bastian Ballmann Uster, Switzerland ISBN 978-3-662-62156-1 ISBN 978-3-662-62157-8 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62157-8 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2015, 2021 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifcally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microflms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifc statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affliations. Responsible Editor: Martin Börger This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Linux Games Page 1 of 7
    Linux Games Page 1 of 7 Linux Games INTRODUCTION such as the number of players and the size of the map, then you start the game. Once the game is running clients may Hello. My name is Andrew Howlett. I've been using Linux join the game. Clients connect to the game using TCP/IP, since 1997. In 2000 I cutover to Linux for all my projects, so it is very easy to play multi-player games over the except I dual-booted Windows to play games. I like to play Internet. Like many Free games, clients are available for computer games. About a year ago I stopped dual booting. many platforms, including Windows, Amiga and Now I play computer games under Linux. The games I Macintosh. So there are lots of players out there. If you play can be divided into four groups: Free Games, native don't want to play against other humans, then Freeciv linux commercial games, Windows Emulated games, and includes some nasty AIs. Win4Lin enabled games. This presentation will demonstrate games from each of these four groups. BZFlag Platform BZFlag is a tank combat game along the same lines as the old BattleZone game. Like FreeCiv, BZFlag uses a client/ Before I get started, a little bit about my setup so you can server architecture over TCP/IP networks. Unlike FreeCiv, relate this to whatever you are running. This is a P3 900 the game contains no AIs – you must play this game MHz machine. It has a Crystal Sound 4600 sound card and against other humans (? entities ?) over the Internet.
    [Show full text]
  • Win4lin — Emulator Windows Dla Linuksa
    Win4Lin — Emulator Windows dla Linuksa Karol Grela ako chemik−organik, używający Linuksa do codziennej dows 95 OSR2 PL mój stary komputer Pentium 233 MMX z 64 pracy, nie mam zazwyczaj problemu ze znalezieniem MB RAM−u był aż nadto wystarczający. potrzebnych programów. Większość narzędzi tworzonych Z punktu widzenia użytkownika, sesja Windows uruchomiona przez naukowców dla naukowców kompiluje się bez w emulatorze jest po prostu jeszcze jedną aplikacją działającą problemu w każdym Uniksie (np. VMD, mopac, platon), w środowisku X Window (Rysunek 1, [8a]). Okno MS Windows a komercyjne posiadają zazwyczaj wersje dla Linuksa (np. mol− może być także wyświetlone na zdalnym komputerze, za pomo− den, pcmodel). Z aplikacjami przeznaczonymi dla innych syste− cą mechanizmów sieciowych X−ów [8b]. mów uniksowych, takimi jak XWinnmr dla Silicon Graphics, daje się bez problemu pracować w systemie X Window. Czasem jed− Instalacja nak muszę używać lub testować oprogramowanie, które nie po− Ponieważ proces instalacji i konfiguracji Win4Lin oraz systemu siada jeszcze odpowiednika pod Linuksem. Dodatkowo prowa− Windows jest wyczerpująco opisany w dokumentacji dostarcza− dzę kilka projektów, takich jak ChemPerfect — zestaw narzędzi nej z programem oraz dostępnej na WWW firmy TreLOS [5], sku− chemicznych do Wordperfecta. Projekt ten rozwijam w dwu wer− pię się na kilku mniej oczywistych punktach. Zakładam też, że sjach — dla Windows i Linuksa. Czasem muszę wprowadzić drob− Czytelnik zna podstawy pracy z Linuksem (i Windows), posiada ne poprawki w tej pierwszej wersji, a nie chce mi się tylko z tego uprawnienia roota i (ewentualnie) wie jak skompilować i zainsta− powodu restartować komputera i ładować MS Windows. Co więcej, lować jądro systemu.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossover Compared to Competing Emulation Solutions
    CrossOver Compared to Competing Emulation Solutions CrossOver Compared to Competing Emulation Solutions CrossOver Compared to Competing Emulation Solutions Overview: Whether you’re running a Linux or Mac OS X machine, chances are you need a way to run at least some Windows applications or games that aren’t available on your platform of choice. And you have your choice of potential solutions to this problem. This page illustrates some of the key Every Windows advantages that CrossOver has in relation to the compatibility solution has other compatibility solutions. pros and cons. When presented with the need to run Windows applications on a Mac or Linux machine, you have basically three main choices: Dual-booting: running two separate operating systems on one PC, and switching between them as needed by rebooting. Applications such as Apple’s Bootcamp allow this to occur on a Mac OS X machine, for example. Running a virtual machine: Emulation products such as VMWare and Parallels allow you to install a copy of Windows within a logical partition within your native operating system. The Windows applications essentially run in a separate “box within a box.” Running Wine or CrossOver: Unlike emulation, Wine is a re-implementation of the Win32 API, allowing applications to run as if natively on the target OS. CrossOver is a commercialized version of Wine. Each solution has its advantages and disadvantages. This document is provided to help identify and evaluate key points of comparison between CodeWeavers’ CrossOver products and some of its key competitors. Technology Approach General Approach Dual-booting is exactly what it sounds like—shutting down one operating system, starting another, and dealing with the file transfer issues associated with same.
    [Show full text]
  • An Empirical Study Into the Security Exposure to Hosts of Hostile Virtualized Environments
    An Empirical Study into the Security Exposure to Hosts of Hostile Virtualized Environments Tavis Ormandy [email protected] Google, Inc. Abstract machine monitor is ‘root secure’[25], meaning that no level of As virtual machines become increasingly commonplace as privilege within the virtualized guest environment permits a method of separating hostile or hazardous code from com- interference with the host system. modity systems, the potential security exposure from imple- Detection mentation flaws has increased dramatically. This paper Detecting virtualized environments has been explored in investigates the state of popular virtual machine implementa- detail by other researchers[22]. Virtual machines employed in tions for x86 systems, employing a combination of source code malware analysis or honeypots should endeavour to be unde- auditing and blackbox random testing to assess the security tectable or risk changing the behaviour of the emulated code. exposure to the hosts of hostile virtualized environments. An emulated malware sample could choose to act benignly, Keywords for example, but when executed on a physical machine imme- virtualization, security, software testing diately performs some malicious action. Detection will not be considered any further in this paper, although being able to detect a virtual machine, or more spe- I. INTRODUCTION cifically, virtual machine implementation, may be a prerequi- Secure isolation is one of the fundamental concepts of vir- site for the more serious attacks investigated in this paper. tualization[15], confining a program to a virtualized environ- Without being able to identify which virtual machine imple- ment should guarantee that any action performed inside the mentation is present, an attacker would have difficulty deter- virtual machine cannot interfere with the system that hosts it1.
    [Show full text]
  • Alan Watt "Cutting Through the Matrix" Live on Rbn #101
    Transcripts of: ALAN WATT "CUTTING THROUGH THE MATRIX" LIVE ON RBN #101 - 125 April 14, 2008 – June 9, 2008 Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - 2008 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes and Callers' Comments) Alan Watt's Official Websites: WWW.CUTTINGTHROUGHTHEMATRIX.COM www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu "While Inflicting Torture and Pain, Our Masters "All That Was must Pass Away" Make Hay for Financial Gain - May 12, 2008 #113 The End of Morality in the New Corporate Feudal System" - April 14, 2008 #101 "Your Neighbourhood Snoopers are Such Party Poopers" - May 14, 2008 #114 "Crisis Cry-Sis from the Boys at the Top" April 16, 2008 #102 "The Web it said Will Soon be Dead" May 16, 2008 #115 "The Nation-State is now Transcendent, You are now Global Slaves and Interdependent - Analysis "Freedom of Mind for He Who Chooses, Is of Gordon Brown Speech at Kennedy Center" Known by Controllers Who Study The Muses" April 18, 2008 #103 May 19, 2008 #116 "Gorge and Binge to go Out of Fashion" "The Chessboard's Set, The Pawns are in Place, April 21, 2008 #104 As They Move Toward The Humanimal Race" May 21, 2008 #117 "The New Autism ain't What It used to Be - Comparative Studies within Amish Community" "The Mass-Man Moves toward Integration, The April 23, 2008 #105 Few with Spirit toward Separation" May 23, 2008 #118 "Big Brother's Coming Door-to-Door to Enquire about Your Sex Life - "Con of the Carbon Life-form" Strictly For Statistical Reasons, of course" May 26, 2008 #119 April 25, 2008 #106 "For 'Trekkie' fans, It's 'Red Alert!', "Shortly, Food Supplements
    [Show full text]
  • The Hacker Voice Telecomms Digest #2.00 LULU
    P3 … Connections. P5 … You Got Mail… Voicemail. P7 … Unexpected Hack? P8 … Rough Guide To No. Stations pt2. P12 … One Way/One Time Pads. P16 … Communications. Your Letters, Answered… Perhaps! P17 … The Hacker Voice Projects. P19 … Automating Network Enumeration. P22 … An Introduction to Backdoors. The Hackers Voice Digest Team P27 … Interesting Numbers. Editors: Demonix & Blue_Chimp. Staff Writers: Belial, Blue_Chimp, Naxxtor, Demonix, P28 … Phreaking Bloody Adverts! Hyper, & 10Nix. Pssst! Over Here… You want one of these?! Contributors: Skrye, Vesalius, Remz, Tsun, Alan, Desert Rose & Zinya. P29 … Intro to VoIP for Practical Phreaking Layout: Demonix. Cover Graphics : Belial & Demonix. P31 … Google Chips. Printing: Printed copies of this magazine (inc. back issues) are available from P32 … Debain Ubuntu A-Z of Administration. www.lulu.com. Thanks : To everyone who has input into this issue, especially the people who have P36 … DIY Tools. submitted an article and gave feedback on the first Issue. P38 … Beginners Guide to Pen Testing. Back Page: UV’s World War Poster Productions. P42 … The Old Gibson Phone System. What is The Hackers Voice? The Hackers Voice is a community designed to bring back hacking P43 … Introduction to R.F.I. and phreaking to the UK . Hacking is the exploration of Computer Science, Electronics, or anything that has been modified to P55 … Unexpected Hack – The Return! perform a function that it wasn't originally designed to perform. Hacking IS NOT EVIL, despite what the mainstream media says. We do not break into people / corporations' computer systems and P56 … Click, Print, 0wn! networks with the intent to steal information, software or intellectual property.
    [Show full text]
  • Bastian Ballmann Attack and Defense with Python
    Bastian Ballmann Understanding Network Hacks Attack and Defense with Python Understanding Network Hacks Bastian Ballmann Understanding Network Hacks Attack and Defense with Python 123 Bastian Ballmann Uster, Switzerland Translation from the German language edition “Network Hacks - Intensivkurs”, c Springer-Verlag, 2012 ISBN 978-3-662-44436-8 ISBN 978-3-662-44437-5 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-44437-5 Springer Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2014960247 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center. Violations are liable to prosecution under the respective Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Index
    41_067232945x_index.qxd 10/5/07 1:09 PM Page 667 Index NUMBERS 3D video, 100-101 10BaseT Ethernet NIC (Network Interface Cards), 512 64-bit processors, 14 100BaseT Ethernet NIC (Network Interface Cards), 512 A A (Address) resource record, 555 AbiWord, 171-172 ac command, 414 ac patches, 498 access control, Apache web server file systems, 536 access times, disabling, 648 Accessibility module (GNOME), 116 ACPI (Advanced Configuration and Power Interface), 61-62 active content modules, dynamic website creation, 544 Add a New Local User screen, 44 add command (CVS), 583 address books, KAddressBook, 278 Administrator Mode button (KDE Control Center), 113 Adobe Reader, 133 AFPL Ghostscript, 123 41_067232945x_index.qxd 10/5/07 1:09 PM Page 668 668 aggregators aggregators, 309 antispam tools, 325 aKregator (Kontact), 336-337 KMail, 330-331 Blam!, 337 Procmail, 326, 329-330 Bloglines, 338 action line special characters, 328 Firefox web browser, 335 recipe flags, 326 Liferea, 337 special conditions, 327 Opera web browser, 335 antivirus tools, 331-332 RSSOwl, 338 AP (Access Points), wireless networks, 260, 514 aKregator webfeeder (Kontact), 278, 336-337 Apache web server, 529 album art, downloading to multimedia dynamic websites, creating players, 192 active content modules, 544 aliases, 79 CGI programming, 542-543 bash shell, 80 SSI, 543 CNAME (Canonical Name) resource file systems record, 555 access control, 536 local aliases, email server configuration, 325 authentication, 536-538 allow directive (Apache2/httpd.conf), 536 installing Almquist shells
    [Show full text]