Executive Summary

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Executive Summary OSCAR EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OSCAR EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WHAT’S THE STORY Oscar is a revolutionary, new Kind of insurance coMpany putting a major staKe in the ground to advance a tech-start-up-like, consuMer- driven healthcare experience. With Oscar and its “SiMple” plans, MeMbers receive free doctor visits, free preventive care, and free generic drugs. All eleMents of the Oscar plans are designed to cater to the Modern consumer, including slicK insurance cards sent in a box (a la receiving a brand new iPhone), a FacebooK-esque online portal that tracKs meMbers’ medical history, a wearable device and other technology handouts, health-incentivized rebates, price transparency tools, and doctors available anytiMe for minor symptoms and conditions. The coMpany’s priMary target as a start-up is on the individual insurance MarKet. Future plans are to expand Oscar to the sMall-group MarKet and eventually to large eMployers. The goal is to “win custoMers in today’s world while siMultaneously preparing for a world of consumer-centric health insurance that’s not quite here yet.” The coMpany was founded because of a frustrating experience by one of its founders related to a coMplicated bill froM a traditional insurer. He said, “I’m overeducated, and I had no idea what it all Meant. So I thought, OK, how can we take technology, data, and design and Make this transparent and easy to understand?” Oscar distinguished itself early via its quirKy subway advertising in New YorK City with a younger generation tone and imagery. It partners with MagnaCare’s local provider network in New York, and with QualCare’s in New Jersey. It plans to expand into other states and will pursue siMilar partnership strategies with provider networKs there. Just two years in business, Oscar faces challenges and has both fans and detractors. While investors and healthcare industry insiders credit Oscar for introducing a health insurance product that is appealing for consuMers, they question whether Oscar is ahead of its tiMe. Critics have raised concerns about Oscar’s personal health record inforMation being stored on a cloud-based internet server. Others question Oscar’s long-terM viability given the low-margin business of insurance and amidst the coMpetitive rich pocKets and deep foundations of the industry’s insurance giants. © Copyright 2017 Strategy Advantage. All rights reserved. 2 HOW IT WORKS Oscar prides itself on offering a “no-surprises” experience froM initial care to subMitting claiMs and paying bills. For exaMple, when searching for a provider, Oscar uses a Google Maps-enabled software that ranks available physicians in the closest geographic area to the member’s home or office. For Minor conditions (such as colds, stoMachaches, or sore throats), Oscar provides a search engine with “duMbed- down-speak” queries such as “My tuMMy hurts” or “My throat is scratchy” or “headache.” In addition, members can use a free doctor helpline to address symptoMs directly via the Oscar iPhone app. Oscar promises that a doctor will call bacK within one hour to provide care over the phone and, if necessary, to send in a prescription to the patients’ closest pharMacy. Oscar stresses that this feature is not Meant to be used for chronic or More serious issues. For this service, Oscar pays its physicians $40 – half the reiMbursement cost of an office visit – and believes the app-based service will reduce patients’ use of unnecessary visits. Oscar’s health plans are offered on the ObaMacare exchange in certain states. different options and Monthly pricing plans are available. While the plans are coMpetitively priced, they are not the cheapest plans and they typically offer fewer choices of doctors and hospitals than classic plans. With Oscar health plan sign-up, Members are provided with their own personal online portal that presents all of their Medical inforMation and records on a digital tiMeline in reverse chronological order, Much liKe social Media newsfeeds. Any care a patient receives, whether in person, on the phone, or in a hospital, is on the tiMeline including a record of the “visits”, notes from doctors, reminders for follow-ups, and warnings about possible drug interactions. Oscar also brings a serious focus to wellness and MeMber / patient engageMent via its health incentive prograMs that include free, Misfit Wearables fitness tracKers and money-bacK incentives in the forM of AMazon giftcards when MeMbers reach specific personal goals each Month. The coMpany believes that its “easy tech tools can actually Make people healthier, not just less unhappy with their health insurance.” HOW THE IdEA, COMPANY, ANd MOdEL OF CARE ARE EVOLVING © Copyright 2017 Strategy Advantage. All rights reserved. 3 Headquartered in New YorK, for-profit Oscar was organized in the SumMer of 2013 by three Harvard Business School classMates: Joshua Kushner (the son of a proMinent real estate faMily and founder of venture capital firM Thrive Capital), Mario Schlosser (a Stanford-trained coMputer prograMMer and former McKinsey & CoMpany employee), and Kevin Nazemi (an ex-Microsoft healthcare division executive). By Fall 2013, Oscar launched the new health plan in New YorK, right ahead of the first ObaMacare open enrollMent period, after having raised $174 Million in capital from bacKers including Thrive, Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund, Horizon Venture, General Catalyst, Wellington ManageMent, GoldMan Sachs, and Khosla Ventures. In its first year as a health plan, Oscar touted 17,000 subscribers and year-end revenue of $72 Million. Oscar expanded into New Jersey in late 2014, in tiMe for the second ObaMacare open enrollMent period. The coMpany has since grown to More than 40,000 MeMbers and annual revenue of $200 Million. In late August 2016, the company announced that they were exiting the New Jersey MarKetplace as of 2017. Oscar has raised More than $300 Million since its 2013 start. It has recruited a sMall arMy of tech engineers and website architects froM TuMblr, Google, FacebooK, and Spotify to advance its digital-first mindset. In April 2015, the coMpany was valued at $1.5 billion despite a loss of $27.5 Million in 2014. They project reaching profitability by 2016. In SepteMber 2015, Oscar received significant support froM Google Capital with a $32.5 Million investMent for its potential to lower hospital bills for patients. This brings Oscar’s overall value at $1.75 billion. This supports opens the door for other potential collaborations liKe potentially Oscar helping to push Google’s new glucose-monitoring contact lenses out to Market. During the 2015 NoveMber enrollMent cycle, Oscar Moved into select California Markets with plans to move into Texas, specifically Dallas and San Antonio, in 2016 where they plan to partner with Tenet Healthcare and Baylor Scott & White Health. It was reported in February 2016, that they gained 43,000 meMbers in Dallas and San Antonio with this first offering, however only enrolled 5,000 in Los Angeles and Orange County. In February 2016, with Oscar having over 145,000 Members up from last year’s 40,000, Fidelity InvestMents invested $400 Million in Oscar health (maKing that a total of $700 Million in funding) bringing their valuation to $2.7 billion dollars despite recently reporting losses of $105.2 Million in New YorK and New Jersey for 2015. According to reporting, the losses are due to a hit from the ACA’s risK adjustMent program as well as their inability to negotiate as a young insurance provider with costly health networK contracts – Oscar spent 75% of their premiums on hospital costs alone in 2015. Oscar CEO Mario Schlosser stated that their strategy to grow to 1 Million MeMbers within 5 years is to “use tight, exclusive networKs with hospitals to sell coMpetitively priced insurance in perhaps 30 U.S. MarKets” which is differentiated from their initial strategy to go after a broad networK of hospitals liKe the More traditional insurers. In March 2016, veteran Google VP Alan Warren joined Oscar as Chief Technology Officer and SVP of engineering. In June 2016, Oscar announced that they would expand into TeMpe, Arizona. During that saMe Month, Oscar revealed that they plan to start an initiative in September 2016 that would lead to the opening of their own New YorK health clinic where Members can have in-person visits with priMary care doctors. In August 2016, it was reported that Oscar lost $52.2M during the first half of 2016. These nuMbers only reflected losses in their New YorK marKet area, however, they also experienced losses in their California and Texas marKets as well. As a result of these losses, Oscar decided to significantly raise their premiums by 20% and eliMinate alMost half of their provider networK. These extreMe changes went into effect in 2017. © Copyright 2017 Strategy Advantage. All rights reserved. 4 In SepteMber 2016, Dr. Shaden MarzouK, who previously worKed a Cardinal Health, was recruited to Oscar as their Chief Medical Officer. In NoveMber 2016, Oscar reported another $45 million in losses during the third quarter of the year. These losses occurred in Texas, California and New YorK. In DeceMber 2016, Oscar opened their first in-person clinic, what they are calling an ‘Oscar Center’, in BrooKlyn, NY. This clinic was opened through a partnership with Mount Sinai Health SysteM and features online, saMe day appointMents and paperless records in a Modern and sleek office. © Copyright 2017 Strategy Advantage. All rights reserved. 5 .
Recommended publications
  • 2012 Annual Report
    2012 ANNUAL REPORT Table of Contents Letter from the President & CEO ......................................................................................................................5 About The Paley Center for Media ................................................................................................................... 7 Board Lists Board of Trustees ........................................................................................................................................8 Los Angeles Board of Governors ................................................................................................................ 10 Public Programs Media As Community Events ......................................................................................................................14 INSIDEMEDIA/ONSTAGE Events ................................................................................................................15 PALEYDOCFEST ......................................................................................................................................20 PALEYFEST: Fall TV Preview Parties ...........................................................................................................21 PALEYFEST: William S. Paley Television Festival ......................................................................................... 22 Special Screenings .................................................................................................................................... 23 Robert M.
    [Show full text]
  • Source:. Auditreferral
    I' .. .. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION ' ,999 E Street,'N.W. Washington, D.C. 20463'. .. FIRST GENEW,COUNSEL'S REPORT AUDIT'REFERRAL: 01-11 . AUDIT REFERRAL DATE: June 8,2001 I. DATE ACTIVATED: October 24,2001 EXP~RATIONOF STATUTE OF'LIMITATIONS: . December 5,2002 -.August 17,2005' STAFF MEMBERS: Albert Veldhuyzen ' . Michelle E. Abellera r. I I .. .. SOURCE:. AUDITREFERRAL ' RESPONDENTS: Bill Bradley for President, Inc. and TheodoreV. Wells, as Treasurer 135 .MontgomeryAssociates .. .. Avenue Associates 836 .. .. AbbyJo Ages . .. ,. ,.-I-..* ,.-I-..* 6-j BP Developers, L.P. .. ...-_, ' .. 5' .A . ' Brick Building Associates; L.P. -... .. ...::- ... .--l' .. Bruckner Plaza Associates ' . .... :.. e: :: .:.j ._:_, :. ... -.. Colfax Manor, L.P. ..' C" .. .. ....a , ... 'a .._. _.I. .-. (?! :*-! , ... - College Park Associates, L.P. .-. r--.._.I .._ - ' [=I "' .Fz L. Constantine Village Associates . -z.. --- t. -.: -. , . rP.-; * .- Dara Building Associates, L.P. , . .. East Brunswick Corporate Center Edgewater Apartments Associates, L.P. Bernard Eichler .. Elmwood V. Associates, L.P. .. .. .. Jefiey Freireich ' . The statute of limitations period for the.corporate contributions and contributions in the name of another is ' . December 5,2002 - August 17, 2005 reflecting the earliest and latest contributions made to Lautenberg 2000 on . December 5, 1997 and to DNC Services CorporatiodDNC on August 17,.2000. Within the context of Bradley for . President, Inc.., the earliest statute of limitations date.is June 16,2004, as a result of contribution checks dated June 16and 17, 1999. .. I Audit Referral 0 1 - 1 1 First General Counsel's Report Page '2 Melvin Gebroe . Barbara Gellert George Gellert General Green Village Associates .. .. Bert Ghavami .. .I' I Stuart Gladstone Glen Ellen Associates, L.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of US-Israel Relations During Trump Presidency
    Evolution of US-Israel Relations During Trump Presidency By South Front Region: Middle East & North Africa, USA Global Research, August 16, 2020 Theme: History South Front 14 August 2020 Preferential treatment for Israel has long been a prerequisite for success in the corridors of power in Washington, where ambitious politicians long ago learned to fear the wrath of ‘the Israel lobby’, and at the same time yearn for the deluge of ‘Benjamins’ and other fringe benefits that ‘the lobby’ in all its forms and manifestations can muster. Nonetheless, relations between the leadership of the two countries have reached new heights – and plunged new depths – during the Trump administration. The United States under the Trump administration has undergone a shift in its foreign policy, with the new president regularly insulting and expressing contempt for the US’ strategic allies and threatening to dismantle the bilateral and multilateral arrangements that they have developed over the course of many years to organize and institutionalize their relations. The one exception from the outset was the US ‘special relationship’ with Israel. The Foreign Policy Institute summarized the differences between the approaches of the Obama and Trump presidencies to foreign policy in the following manner: “Trump is a kind of illiberal alter ego of Obama. Whereas Obama looked to use force alongside allies (“leading from behind” in the 2011 Libya War), Trump has long been disdainful toward America’s coalition partners. In 1987, Trump paid for an advertisement in theNew York Times that railed against allies, “taking advantage of the United States.” As president, Trump has been deeply critical of trade agreements and has withdrawn from more treaties and organizations than all the other post-Cold War U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • C. Corporate Contributions...F
    NOV 5 '2003 RECEIVED ..- F E DE R AL EL E C T ION' BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION SECRETARIATCOPQMlSSlOW . ZN?.NOU -5 P 12: 30 In the Matter of Bill Bradley for President, Inc. and. Theodore V. Wells, as Treasurer; Kushner Companies and MUR 5279 40 Associated Partnerships; 4 1 Individual Respondents GENERAL COUNSEL'S REPORT ## 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Actions Recommended. ........................................................ 2 II. Background Factual Analysis. ................................................ 3 A. Contributions to the Bradley Committee. .............................. 6 III. Legal Framework. .............................................................. ' 11 22 A. ,Contributions in the Name of Another.. ................................ 11 23 B. Partnership Contributions................................................... 12 '. .' 24 C. Corporate Contributions.. .................................................. 12 ... 25 D. Corporate Facilitation. ....................................................... 13 26 E. Conduit Liability. ............................................................ 13 .. 27 F. Excessive Contnbutions. .................................................... 13 28 Iv. Legal Analysis. ....................................................................... 14 29 A. Partner Liability.. ............................................................. 14 30 1. Partnership Contributions.. ........................................... i . 14 31 a. Non-Partner Contributions........................................
    [Show full text]
  • California Watch November 21, 2016 Health Law Issues
    CALIFORNIA WATCH NOVEMBER 21, 2016 The New York Times: Medical Marijuana is Legal in California. Except When it’s Not. In what may be a sign of things to come after the drug’s broader legalization, medical cannabis companies like CannaCraft — which have operated in a quasi-legal, unregulated market, or gray market, for the past two decades in California — continue to be whipsawed by the glaring contradiction between a federal ban on marijuana and still-evolving state laws that should, in theory, shelter the companies from prosecution. Cannabis enterprises deal almost exclusively in cash because banks, fearing federal consequences, will not take their business. (Fuller, 11/21) Ventura County Star: Home Health Agency Gains Recognition Simi Valley Hospital announced that Adventist Health/Home Care Services has been named a top agency of the 2016 HomeCare Elite, a recognition of the top-performing U.S. home health agencies. "We are very proud of our team and the exceptional care they provide. This award is well-deserved and represents the level of quality our home health patients experience with Adventist Health/Home Care Services — Simi Valley," said Caroline Esparza, chief operating officer and chief nursing officer at Simi Valley Hospital. Eileen Tondreau, RN, BSN, director of Adventist Health/Home Care Services — Simi Valley, credits the expertise of the home health nurses, physical therapists, occupational therapists, speech therapists, aides and social workers for the success of this achievement. (11/18) HEALTH LAW ISSUES AND IMPLEMENTATION Politico: Obamacare Repeal Plan Stokes Fears of Market Collapse Republicans warned for years that Obamacare would blow up the nation's individual insurance market.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Self-Tracking in Health Insurance Pricing
    Economy and Society ISSN: 0308-5147 (Print) 1469-5766 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/reso20 Personalizing solidarity? The role of self-tracking in health insurance pricing Liz McFall To cite this article: Liz McFall (2019): Personalizing solidarity? The role of self-tracking in health insurance pricing, Economy and Society, DOI: 10.1080/03085147.2019.1570707 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2019.1570707 © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 19 Mar 2019. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 250 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=reso20 Economy and Society https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2019.1570707 Personalizing solidarity? The role of self-tracking in health insurance pricing Liz McFall Abstract Can data-driven innovations, working across an internet of connected things, person- alize health insurance prices? The emergence of self-tracking technologies and their adoption and promotion in health insurance products has been characterized as a threat to solidaristic models of healthcare provision. If individual behaviour rather than group membership were to become the basis of risk assessment, the social, econ- omic and political consequences would be far-reaching. It would disrupt the distribu- tive, solidaristic character that is expressed within all health insurance schemes, even in those nominally designated as private or commercial. Personalized risk pricing is at odds with the infrastructures that presently define, regulate and deliver health insurance. Self-tracking can be readily imagined as an element in an ongoing bio-political redistri- bution of the burden of responsibility from the state to citizens but it is not clear that such a scenario could be delivered within existing individual private health insurance operational and regulatory infrastructures.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Amendment No. 3 to FORM S-1 Oscar Health, Inc
    Table of Contents As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2021 Registration No. 333-252809 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Amendment No. 3 to FORM S-1 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 Oscar Health, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 6324 46-1315570 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code (I.R.S. Employer Number) Identification No.) 75 Varick Street, 5th Floor New York, New York 10013 (646) 403-3677 (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices) Bruce L. Gottlieb, Esq. Special Counsel Oscar Health, Inc. 75 Varick Street, 5th Floor New York, New York 10013 (646) 403-3677 (Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service) Copies to: Keith L. Halverstam, Esq. Joseph C. Theis, Jr., Esq. Peter N. Handrinos, Esq. Paul R. Rosie, Esq. Latham & Watkins LLP Goodwin Procter LLP 885 Third Avenue 100 Northern Avenue New York, New York 10022 Boston, Massachusetts 02210 (212) 906-1200 (617) 570-1000 APPROXIMATE DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC: AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE AFTER THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT IS DECLARED EFFECTIVE. If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box. ☐ If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.
    [Show full text]
  • Personalizing Solidarity? the Role of Self-Tracking in Health Insurance Pricing', Economy and Society, Vol
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Personalizing solidarity? Citation for published version: Mcfall, E 2019, 'Personalizing solidarity? The role of self-tracking in health insurance pricing', Economy and Society, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 52-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2019.1570707 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1080/03085147.2019.1570707 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Economy and Society General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 09. Oct. 2021 Economy and Society ISSN: 0308-5147 (Print) 1469-5766 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/reso20 Personalizing solidarity? The role of self-tracking in health insurance pricing Liz McFall To cite this article: Liz McFall (2019): Personalizing solidarity? The role of self-tracking in health insurance pricing, Economy and Society, DOI: 10.1080/03085147.2019.1570707 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2019.1570707 © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 19 Mar 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Oscar Health, Inc
    37,041,026 Shares Class A Common Stock This is the initial public offering of shares of Class A common stock of Oscar Health, Inc. We are selling 36,391,946 shares of Class A common stock, and the selling stockholders named in this prospectus are selling 649,080 shares of Class A common stock. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares of Class A common stock offered by the selling stockholders. Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our Class A common stock. The initial public offering price per share of Class A common stock is $39.00. We have been approved to list our Class A common stock on the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE, under the symbol “OSCR.” Prior to completion of this offering, we will have two classes of common stock: Class A common stock and Class B common stock. The rights of the holders of Class A common stock and Class B common stock will be identical, except with respect to voting, conversion, and transfer rights. Each share of Class A common stock will be entitled to one vote. Each share of Class B common stock will be entitled to 20 votes and will be convertible at any time into one share of Class A common stock and mandatorily convertible upon the occurrence of certain events, as further described in “Description of Capital Stock.” Thrive Capital (as defined herein), which is affiliated with our Co-Founder Joshua Kushner, and Mario Schlosser, our other Co-Founder, will be the only holders of our Class B common stock, and following the completion of this offering, Thrive Capital and our Co- Founders will beneficially own approximately 82.4% of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock, assuming no exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares of our Class A common stock.
    [Show full text]
  • Real Estate CEO Jared Kushner Joins Company's
    Honest Buildings secures multi-million dollar financing led by Thrive Capital; Real estate CEO Jared Kushner joins company's board January 13, 2014 - Front Section Honest Buildings, the leading online marketplace and business development engine for building professionals, today announced that it has secured $4 million in Series A-1 Financing from a group of investors led by Thrive Capital, a private equity and venture capital firm founded by Joshua Kushner that focuses on technology investments. The financing, which also includes participation by investors Westly Group and RockPort Capital, coincides with Honest Buildings' announcement that Jared Kushner, CEO of Kushner Companies, a diversified private real estate organization, has joined Honest Buildings' board on behalf of Thrive. The new financing is a testament to Honest Buildings' momentum in the marketplace and will enable the company to further strengthen its service offerings, including its flagship product, HB Match, an online platform that drives transactions by pairing building owners with qualified building professionals. Since the beginning of the year, approximately $55 million in contracts have been originated through HB Match, including $30 million in contracts originated in the past five months alone. By providing a simple web platform for building professionals to create free, online portfolios of their work, Honest Buildings is able to run custom searches on behalf of real estate decision-makers and produce detailed evaluations of experienced specialists appropriate for the project. The result is an efficient, enhanced process for building owners to quickly and thoroughly compare, vet and select the best building professional for the specific requirements of their projects, saving valuable time and resources.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2018
    » Read more: A Year in Review: Music, movies, weddings, news headlines and more on Page 6. TheNeuqua Valley’s Echo Student Newspaper December 30, 2018 Neuqua Valley High School @NV_ECHO Volume 21 Issue 4 2360 95th St. Naperville, IL 60564 nvecho.weebly.com Weed legalization: Learning with Dignity Act when the smoke clears raises questions in district 204 Emma Wightkin Allison Blaszak are not readily available in bathrooms, she Student Life Editor Staff Writer has to walk from the restroom to class in Pot, weed, grass, dope, or, in more order to get a pass and then travel to the technical terms, marijuana, originated MEME OF The state of Illinois has passed the nurse’s office in order to receive what she as a medicinal herb in Asia around 500 Learn with Dignity Act created on Jan. needs. B.C. It has now become a part of pop THE MONTH 1, 2018, requiring both middle and high The students from the high schools spoke culture, with recreational use featured -Paige Smith- schools to provide free menstrual prod- to the school board, in light of the lack in mainstream media. Although medi- ucts in the bathrooms at high schools and of the law’s implementation at schools, cal use has been accessible throughout 2018 was truly the year of the meme, middle schools. So far, there has been no and stated that menstrual products many states in America since the 1990s, in January teens were eating tide pods change in district 204 schools. Students should be available not only in the nurse’s recreational use of the substance didn’t and watching Logan Paul.
    [Show full text]
  • A Symbolic Convergence Theory Examination of “Other Girls” Brilynn Janckila
    St. Cloud State University theRepository at St. Cloud State Culminating Projects in English Department of English 8-2019 Boys Will Be Boys, Girls Will Be Not Like Other Girls: A Symbolic Convergence Theory Examination of “Other Girls” Brilynn Janckila Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/engl_etds Recommended Citation Janckila, Brilynn, "Boys Will Be Boys, Girls Will Be Not Like Other Girls: A Symbolic Convergence Theory Examination of “Other Girls”" (2019). Culminating Projects in English. 154. https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/engl_etds/154 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of English at theRepository at St. Cloud State. It has been accepted for inclusion in Culminating Projects in English by an authorized administrator of theRepository at St. Cloud State. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Boys Will Be Boys, Girls Will Be Not Like Other Girls: A Symbolic Convergence Theory Examination of “Other Girls” by Brilynn Janckila A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of St. Cloud State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in English August, 2019 Thesis Committee: Sharon Cogdill, Chairperson Matt Barton Kirstin Bratt 2 Abstract The fandoms of teenage girls have, historically, been ridiculed by the larger part of American society. The popular interests of teenage girls, such as Taylor Swift, Twilight, or the Beatles, have been used to invalidate young women across America, reducing them to the idea of “basic”—someone who thinks they are unique but likes mainstream trends, such as wearing leggings and drinking Starbucks.
    [Show full text]