DOCSLIB.ORG

USA Space Debris Environment and Operational Updates

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
USA Space Debris Environment and Operational Updates National Aeronautics and Space Administration USA Space Debris Environment and Operational Updates Presentation to the 47 th Session of the Scientific and Technical Subcommittee Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space United Nations 8-19 February 2010 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Presentation Outline • Evolution of Low Earth Orbit Satellite Population • Space missions in 2009 • Collision Avoidance Maneuvers • GEO Population and Retirement of USA GEO Spacecraft in 2009 • Satellite Fragmentations in 2009 • Inspection of Hubble Space Telescope • First International Conference on Orbital Debris Removal 2 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Growth of the Cataloged Satellite Population in Low Earth Orbit: Numbers of Objects • The number of cataloged objects in low Earth orbit has increased 62% since 1 January 2007. 12000 11000 Total Objects Iridium 33 and Cosmos 2251 Collision Fragmentation Debris 10000 Spacecraft 9000 Mission -related Debris Destruction of Fengyun-1C 8000 Rocket Bodies 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 Number of CatalogedCatalogedObjects Objects ofof Number Number 2000 1000 0 1956 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 3 • National Aeronautics and Space Administration tons per year. ISSbelow (data does year. per c notinclude tons orbi Earth growththe mass rate inlowof Recently, Mass in Orbit (millions of kg) in Population SatelliteCataloged the of Growth 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 1957 1959 Low Earth Orbit: Mass of Objects of Mass Earth Orbit: Low 1961 1963 1965 Mission-related Debris Mission-related Debris Fragmentation Bodies Rocket Spacecraft Objects Total 1967 1969 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 4 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 omponents) t has averaged 50 averaged has metric t 1993 1995 1997 Mir De-orbit Mir 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA Space Missions of 2009 • Twelve NASA space missions were undertaken in 2009. Mission Launch Date Destination Other Objects Left in Earth Orbit One rocket body left in disposal orbit; reentered after NOAA 19 * 06 February LEO 2.5 months One rocket body left in disposal orbit between LEO Kepler 07 March Heliocentric Orbit and GEO STS-119 15 March LEO (ISS) No objects left in Earth orbit STS-125 11 May LEO (HST) No objects left in Earth orbit Other objects assoicated with this flight are not PHARMASAT 19 May LEO NASA-related, but all will have short orbital lifetimes. Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter 18 June Lunar orbit No objects left in Earth orbit LCROSS 18 June Lunar impact No objects left in Earth orbit One rocket body left in disposal orbit between LEO GOES 14 * 27 June GEO and GEO Three small payloads and three small debris left in STS-127 15 July LEO (ISS) low altitude, short-lived orbits STS-128 29 August LEO (ISS) No objects left in Earth orbit STS-129 16 November LEO (ISS) No objects left in Earth orbit One rocket body left in disposal orbit between LEO WISE 14 December LEO and GEO; one mission-related debris left in short- lived orbit * Spacecraft developed and launched by NASA for NOAA • All spacecraft, rocket bodies, and mission-related debris residing in or passing through LEO have already reentered or will reenter within 25 years. 5 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Orbital Debris Collision Avoidance • Since 2007 NASA has required all of its maneuverable spacecraft in LEO or GEO to conduct satellite conjunction assessments on a routine basis to avoid accidental collisions with resident space objects. • During 2009 NASA conducted eight collision avoidance maneuvers and assisted France with a collision avoidance maneuver involving the PARASOL spacecraft. Spacecraft Maneuver Date Object Avoided TDRS 3 27 Janaury Proton rocket body ISS 22 March CZ-4 rocket body debris Cloudsat 23 April Cosmos 2251 debris EO-1 11 May Zenit rocket body debris ISS 17 July Proton rocket body debris Space Shuttle 10 September ISS debris PARASOL (France)* 29 September Fengyun-1C debris Aqua 25 November Fengyun-1C debris Landsat 7 11 December Formosat 3D * Operating in NASA-led Earth observation network 6 National Aeronautics and Space Administration GEO Population Assessment • For many years NASA has been observing the GEO uncataloged debris population. Data suggest that the population of debris between 10 cm and 1 m is at least twice that of the cataloged population. 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 of a given size and larger larger andandsizesizegivengiven aa ofof 1,000 Cumulative Number of objects near GEO GEO nearnearobjectsobjects of of NumberNumber CumulativeCumulative 500 0 0.1 1 10 Size of object (meters) 7 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Disposal of USA GEO Satellites in 2009 • Eight USA civil GEO spacecraft conducted disposal maneuvers in 2009. Spacecraft International Designator Minimum Height above GEO Maximum Height above GEO SBS 6 1990-091A 335 395 INTELSAT 605 1991-055A 250 290 DIRECTV 1 1993-078A 340 390 INTELSAT 704 1995-001A 305 315 DIRECTV 3 1995-029A 340 380 GOES 10 1997-019A 335 355 ECHOSTAR 5 1999-050A 420 450 GALAXY 4R * 2000-020A 120 130 * This spacecraft suffered primary and secondary propulsion system failures prior to 2004. All spacecraft except Galaxy 4R meet USA, IADC, and United Nations recommendations for GEO disposal and will not come within the GEO protected region during the next 200 years. • TDRS 1 also completed its mission in 2009 and will be placed in a compliant disposal orbit in 2010. 8 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Satellite Fragmentations in 2009 • Iridium 33 and Cosmos 2251 Collision : Accidental collision on 10 February produced more than 2000 trackable debris. (update on next chart) • Proton launch vehicle ullage motor : Ullage motor from Cosmos 2139-2141 mission (1991-025) broke-up on 8 March. To date, 32 debris have been cataloged by the USA Space Surveillance Network; half have already reentered. • Cosmos 192 : This 42-year old spacecraft (1967-116) experienced a minor fragmentation on 30 August. Less than 20 confirmed debris; only three debris officially cataloged due to high drag coefficients, and all three had reentered within two months. 9 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Update on Iridium-Cosmos Collision • One year after the accidental collision of Iridium 33 and Cosmos 2251, more than 2000 large debris had been identified. 1800 1600 Apogee 1400 Perigee 1200 1000 (kilometers) (kilometers) Cosmos 2251 Debris 800 Altitude 600 400 200 0 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 Orbital Period (minutes) Iridium 33 Debris 10 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Inspection of the Hubble Space Telescope • In May 2009, Space Shuttle Atlantis visited and successfully refurbished the Hubble Space Telescope. • The Wide Field Planetary Camera 2 was removed and returned to Earth after 16 years in space. • Numerous large impact features (green circles) had occurred since the last servicing mission in 2002 (red circles). • Microscopic examinations have revealed nearly 700 hypervelocity impact features greater than 0.3 mm in diameter. WFPC2 Radiator (2.2 m long, 0.8 m tall) 11 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Inspection Instruments • Keyence VHX-600 digital microscope (up to 5000x optical, 2D and 3D) – Records each impact feature’s shape, size, depth, and volume • LAP CAD-Pro laser template projector 12 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Measuring Large Craters Four Diameters: – Spallation Inputs – Bare metal – “Burned” metal – Lips or center Two Depths: – Central crater depth – Paint thickness Results 13 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Measuring Small Craters Inputs Two Diameters: – Spallation – Center One Depth: – Central crater depth Results 14 National Aeronautics and Space Administration First International Conference on Orbital Debris Removal • NASA and the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) last year co-hosted the first international conference dedicated to the subject of the removal of debris from Earth orbit. • The conference was held in the vicinity of Washington, DC, and was attended by more than 275 persons from nine countries. • More than 50 presentations examined International Conference on the technical, economic, legal, and Orbital Debris Removal policy issues associated with removing December 8-10, 2009 small and large debris in low and high altitude orbits. 15.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PUBLIC NOTICE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 445 12Th STREET S.W
    PUBLIC NOTICE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 445 12th STREET S.W. WASHINGTON D.C. 20554 News media information 202-418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202-418-2830; Internet: http://www.fcc.gov (or ftp.fcc.gov) TTY (202) 418-2555 Report No. SES-00224 Wednesday October 11, 2000 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES RE: SATELLITE RADIO APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING The applications listed herein have been found, upon initial review, to be acceptable for filing. The Commission reserves the right to return any of the applications if, upon further examination, it is determined they are defective and not in conformance with the Commission's Rules and Regulations and its Policies. Final action will not be taken on any of these applications earlier than 30 days following the date of this notice. 47 U.S.C. & 309(b). All applications accepted for filing will be assigned call signs, or other unique station identifiers. However, these assignments are for administrative purposes only and do not in any way prejudice Commission action. SES-AMD-20001004-01841 E000524 AT&T CORP. Amendment Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Nature of Service: Domestic Fixed Satellite Service Amendment file to change emission designators and to increase EIRP and EIRP density. SITE ID: MONROVIA, MD LOCATION: 11026 FINGER BOARD ROAD, FREDRICK, MONROVIA, MD 39 ° 20 ' 50.00 " N LAT. 77 ° 16 ' 51.00 " W LONG. ANTENNA ID: A1 4.5 meters ANDREWS ES45MPJ 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 1M34G7W 65.70 dBW QPSK, VOICE, DATA, FEC 3/4 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 1M34G7W QPSK, VOICE, DATA, FEC 3/4 Points of Communication: MONROVIA, MD - ALSAT - (ALSAT) SES-ASG-20000919-01748 E940294 JOURNAL BROADCAST GROUP, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA's Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer (LADEE)
    Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 13, EGU2011-5107-2, 2011 EGU General Assembly 2011 © Author(s) 2011 NASA’s Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer (LADEE) Richard Elphic (1), Gregory Delory (1,2), Anthony Colaprete (1), Mihaly Horanyi (3), Paul Mahaffy (4), Butler Hine (1), Steven McClard (5), Joan Salute (6), Edwin Grayzeck (6), and Don Boroson (7) (1) NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA USA ([email protected]), (2) Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA USA, (3) Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO USA, (4) NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD USA, (5) LunarQuest Program Office, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL USA, (6) Planetary Science Division, Science Mission Directorate, NASA, Washington, DC USA, (7) Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lexington MA USA Nearly 40 years have passed since the last Apollo missions investigated the mysteries of the lunar atmosphere and the question of levitated lunar dust. The most important questions remain: what is the composition, structure and variability of the tenuous lunar exosphere? What are its origins, transport mechanisms, and loss processes? Is lofted lunar dust the cause of the horizon glow observed by the Surveyor missions and Apollo astronauts? How does such levitated dust arise and move, what is its density, and what is its ultimate fate? The US National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council decadal surveys and the recent “Scientific Context for Exploration of the Moon” (SCEM) reports have identified studies of the pristine state of the lunar atmosphere and dust environment as among the leading priorities for future lunar science missions.
    [Show full text]
  • LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned
    Space Sci Rev DOI 10.1007/s11214-011-9759-y LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned Jennifer L. Heldmann · Anthony Colaprete · Diane H. Wooden · Robert F. Ackermann · David D. Acton · Peter R. Backus · Vanessa Bailey · Jesse G. Ball · William C. Barott · Samantha K. Blair · Marc W. Buie · Shawn Callahan · Nancy J. Chanover · Young-Jun Choi · Al Conrad · Dolores M. Coulson · Kirk B. Crawford · Russell DeHart · Imke de Pater · Michael Disanti · James R. Forster · Reiko Furusho · Tetsuharu Fuse · Tom Geballe · J. Duane Gibson · David Goldstein · Stephen A. Gregory · David J. Gutierrez · Ryan T. Hamilton · Taiga Hamura · David E. Harker · Gerry R. Harp · Junichi Haruyama · Morag Hastie · Yutaka Hayano · Phillip Hinz · Peng K. Hong · Steven P. James · Toshihiko Kadono · Hideyo Kawakita · Michael S. Kelley · Daryl L. Kim · Kosuke Kurosawa · Duk-Hang Lee · Michael Long · Paul G. Lucey · Keith Marach · Anthony C. Matulonis · Richard M. McDermid · Russet McMillan · Charles Miller · Hong-Kyu Moon · Ryosuke Nakamura · Hirotomo Noda · Natsuko Okamura · Lawrence Ong · Dallan Porter · Jeffery J. Puschell · John T. Rayner · J. Jedadiah Rembold · Katherine C. Roth · Richard J. Rudy · Ray W. Russell · Eileen V. Ryan · William H. Ryan · Tomohiko Sekiguchi · Yasuhito Sekine · Mark A. Skinner · Mitsuru Sôma · Andrew W. Stephens · Alex Storrs · Robert M. Suggs · Seiji Sugita · Eon-Chang Sung · Naruhisa Takatoh · Jill C. Tarter · Scott M. Taylor · Hiroshi Terada · Chadwick J. Trujillo · Vidhya Vaitheeswaran · Faith Vilas · Brian D. Walls · Jun-ihi Watanabe · William J. Welch · Charles E. Woodward · Hong-Suh Yim · Eliot F. Young Received: 9 October 2010 / Accepted: 8 February 2011 © The Author(s) 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC NOTICE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 445 12Th STREET S.W
    PUBLIC NOTICE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 445 12th STREET S.W. WASHINGTON D.C. 20554 News media information 202-418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202-418-2830; Internet: http://www.fcc.gov (or ftp.fcc.gov) TTY (202) 418-2555 Report No. SAT-00140 Tuesday March 18, 2003 POLICY BRANCH INFORMATION Satellite Space Applications Accepted for Filing The applications listed below have been found, upon initial review, to be acceptable for filing. The Commission reserves the right to return any of the applications if, upon further examination, it is determined the application is not in conformance with the Commission's rules or its policies. Petitions, oppositions and other pleadings filed in response to this notice should conform to Section 25.154 of the Commission's rules, unless otherwise noted. 47 C.F.R. § 25.154. SAT-AMD-20030228-00020 E S2386 PanAmSat Licensee Corp. Amendment PanAmSat Licensee Corp. (PanAmSat) has filed an amendment to its application requesting authority to launch and operate a satellite to replace the C-band fixed-satellite service (FSS) Galaxy IX satellite at 127° W.L. This amendment: (1) changes the name of the replacement satellite from Galaxy IX-R to Galaxy XIII; (2) changes the applicant from PanAmSat Corporation to PanAmSat Licensee Corp., an affiliated company; (3) updates PanAmSat’s financial qualifications; and (4) modifies the technical characteristics of the proposed replacement satellite. (See File No. SAT-LOA-19991207-00118, Public Notice SAT-0030 (December 23, 1999).) SAT-MOD-20030131-00029 P S2396 INTELSAT LLC Modification Intelsat, LLC has filed an application for modification of its authorization to operate its INTELSAT 709 fixed-satellite service satellite.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas V Launches LRO/LCROSS Mission Overview
    Atlas V Launches LRO/LCROSS Mission Overview Atlas V 401 Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, FL Space Launch Complex-41 AV-020/LRO/LCROSS United Launch Alliance is proud to be a part of the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) and the Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite (LCROSS) mission with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The LRO/LCROSS mission marks the sixteenth Atlas V launch and the seventh flight of an Atlas V 401 configuration. LRO/LCROSS is a dual-spacecraft (SC) launch. LRO is a lunar orbiter that will investigate resources, landing sites, and the lunar radiation environment in preparation for future human missions to the Moon. LCROSS will search for the presence of water ice that may exist on the permanently shadowed floors of lunar polar craters. The LCROSS mission will use two Lunar Kinetic Impactors, the inert Centaur upper stage and the LCROSS SC itself, to produce debris plumes that may reveal the presence of water ice under spectroscopic analysis. My thanks to the entire Atlas team for its dedication in bringing LRO/LCROSS to launch, and to NASA for selecting Atlas for this ground-breaking mission. Go Atlas, Go Centaur, Go LRO/LCROSS! Mark Wilkins Vice President, Atlas Product Line Atlas V Launch History Flight Config. Mission Mission Date AV-001 401 Eutelsat Hotbird 6 21 Aug 2002 AV-002 401 HellasSat 13 May 2003 AV-003 521 Rainbow 1 17 Jul 2003 AV-005 521 AMC-16 17 Dec 2004 AV-004 431 Inmarsat 4-F1 11 Mar 2005 AV-007 401 Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter 12 Aug 2005 AV-010 551 Pluto New Horizons 19 Jan 2006 AV-008 411 Astra 1KR 20 Apr 2006 AV-013 401 STP-1 08 Mar 2007 AV-009 401 NROL-30 15 Jun 2007 AV-011 421 WGS SV-1 10 Oct 2007 AV-015 401 NROL-24 10 Dec 2007 AV-006 411 NROL-28 13 Mar 2008 AV-014 421 ICO G1 14 Apr 2008 AV-016 421 WGS-2 03 Apr 2009 Payload Fairing Number of Solid Atlas V Size (meters) Rocket Boosters Flight/Configuration Key AV-XXX ### Number of Centaur Engines 3-digit Tail Number 3-digit Configuration Number LRO Overview LRO is the first mission in NASA’s planned return to the Moon.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Sector Brochure
    SPACE SPACE REVOLUTIONIZING THE WAY TO SPACE SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGIES PROPULSION Moog provides components and subsystems for cold gas, chemical, and electric Moog is a proven leader in components, subsystems, and systems propulsion and designs, develops, and manufactures complete chemical propulsion for spacecraft of all sizes, from smallsats to GEO spacecraft. systems, including tanks, to accelerate the spacecraft for orbit-insertion, station Moog has been successfully providing spacecraft controls, in- keeping, or attitude control. Moog makes thrusters from <1N to 500N to support the space propulsion, and major subsystems for science, military, propulsion requirements for small to large spacecraft. and commercial operations for more than 60 years. AVIONICS Moog is a proven provider of high performance and reliable space-rated avionics hardware and software for command and data handling, power distribution, payload processing, memory, GPS receivers, motor controllers, and onboard computing. POWER SYSTEMS Moog leverages its proven spacecraft avionics and high-power control systems to supply hardware for telemetry, as well as solar array and battery power management and switching. Applications include bus line power to valves, motors, torque rods, and other end effectors. Moog has developed products for Power Management and Distribution (PMAD) Systems, such as high power DC converters, switching, and power stabilization. MECHANISMS Moog has produced spacecraft motion control products for more than 50 years, dating back to the historic Apollo and Pioneer programs. Today, we offer rotary, linear, and specialized mechanisms for spacecraft motion control needs. Moog is a world-class manufacturer of solar array drives, propulsion positioning gimbals, electric propulsion gimbals, antenna positioner mechanisms, docking and release mechanisms, and specialty payload positioners.
    [Show full text]
  • Ssc09-Xii-03
    SSC09-XII-03 The Promise of Innovation from University Space Systems: Are We Meeting It? Michael Swartwout St. Louis University 3450 Lindell Boulevard St. Louis, Missouri 63103; (314) 977-8240 [email protected] ABSTRACT A popular notion among universities is that we are innovation-drivers in the staid, risk-adverse spacecraft industry – we are to professional small satellites what small satellites are to the “battlestars”. By contrast, professional industry takes a much different perspective on university-class spacecraft; these programs are good for attracting students to space and providing valuable pre-career training, but the actual flight missions are ancillary, even unimportant. Which opinion is correct? Both are correct. The vast majority of the 111 student-built spacecraft that have flown have made no innovative contributions. That is not to say that they have been without contribution. In addition to the inarguable benefits to education, many have served as radio Amateur communications, science experiments and even technological demonstrations. But “innovative”? Not so much. However, there have been two innovative contributors, whose contributions are large enough to settle the question: the University of Surrey begat SSTL, which helped create the COTS-based small satellite industry. Stanford and Cal Poly begat CubeSats, whose contributions are still being created today. This paper provides an update to our earlier submissions on the history of student-built spacecraft. Major trends identified in previous years will be re-examined with new data -- especially the bifurcation between larger-scale, larger-scope "flagship" programs and small-scale, reduced-mission "independents". In particular, we will demonstrate that the general history of student-built spacecraft has not been one of innovation, nor of development of new space systems -- with those few, extremely noteworthy, exceptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesat (Launched Dec 2006), – Pre-Sat/Nanosail-D (Aug 2008) – Pharmasat (Launched May 2009), – O/OREOS (Planned May
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Free Flyer Utilization for Biology Research John W. Hines Chief Technologist, Engineering Directorate Technical Director, Nanosatellite Missions NASA-Ames Research Center NASA Applications of BioScience/BioTechnology HumanHuman ExplorationExploration EmphasisEmphasis FundamentalFundamental ExploratiExploratioonn Subsystems BiologyBiology Subsystems EmphasisEmphasis HumansHumans SmallSmall OrganismsOrganisms (Mice,(Mice, Rats) Rats) TiTissussue,e, O Orrgansgans MammalianMammalian CellsCells Human Health Emphasis ModelModel Organisms, BioMolecules Organisms, BioMolecules MicrobesMicrobes 2 4 Free-Flyer Utilization Free Flyer Features • Advantage: Relatively inexpensive means to increase number of flight opportunities • Capabilities: – Returnable capsule to small secondary non-recoverable satellites, and/or – In-situ measurement and control with autonomous sample management • Command and Control: Fully automated or uplinked command driven investigations. • Research data: Downlink and/or receipt of the samples • Collaborations: Interagency, academic, commercial and international Russian Free Flyers Early Free Flyers NASA Biosatellite I, II, 1966-67 NASA Biosatellite III, 1969 Nominal 3d flights Nominal 20d flight • Response to microgravity & • Spaceflight responses of non-human radiation: various biological species primates • Onboard radiation source Timeline of Russian-NASA Biology Spaceflights Collaborations Bion* Characteristics Bion Rationale • Increases access to space • Proven Platforms
    [Show full text]
  • SMART-1 Highlights & Apollo Celebration
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 13, EPSC-DPS2019-824-1, 2019 EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC Attribution 4.0 license. SMART-1 Highlights & Apollo Celebration B.H. Foing, G.Racca, A. Marini, O. Camino, D. Koschny, D. Frew, J. Volp, J.-L. Josset, S. Beauvivre, Y. Shkuratov, K. Muinonen, U. Mall, A. Nathues, M. Grande, B. Kellett, P. Pinet, S. Chevrel, P. Cerroni, M.A. Barucci, S. Erard, D. Despan, V. Shevchenko, P. McMannamon, A.Borst, M. Ellouzi, B. Grieger, M. Almeida, S.Besse, P. Ehrenfreund, C.Veillet, M. Burchell, P. Stooke , SMART1 project, STWT teams, (1) ESA ESTEC, postbus 299, NL-2200 AG Noordwijk, ([email protected]) (2) ILEWG ([email protected]) Abstract SMART-1 results have been relevant for lunar science 11-first mission preparing the ground for ESA and exploration, in relation with previous missions collaboration in Chandrayaan-1, Chang’ E1-2, landers (Apollo, Luna) and subsequent missions (Kaguya, and future international lunar exploration. Chang'E1-2, Chandrayaan-1, LRO, LCROSS, GRAIL, 12-first Earth and Moon family portraits of during cruise LADEE, Chang’E3-4 and future landers). We present and lunar eclipse (Figs 1-2) and Earthrise SMART-1 highlights that celebrate APOLLO legacy after 50 years. Overview of SMART-1 mission and payload: SMART-1 was the first in the programme of ESA’s Small Missions for Advanced Research and Technology [1,2,3]. Its first objective has been achieved to demonstrate Solar Electric Primary Propulsion (SEP) for future Cornerstones (such as Bepi-Colombo) and to test new technologies for spacecraft and instruments.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Ames Research Center Intelligent Systems and High End Computing
    NASA Ames Research Center Intelligent Systems and High End Computing Dr. Eugene Tu, Director NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000 A 80-year Journey 1960 Soviet Union United States Russia Japan ESA India 2020 Illustration by: Bryan Christie Design Updated: 2015 Protecting our Planet, Exploring the Universe Earth Heliophysics Planetary Astrophysics Launch missions such as JWST to Advance knowledge unravel the of Earth as a Determine the mysteries of the system to meet the content, origin, and universe, explore challenges of Understand the sun evolution of the how it began and environmental and its interactions solar system and evolved, and search change and to with Earth and the the potential for life for life on planets improve life on solar system. elsewhere around other stars earth “NASA Is With You When You Fly” Safe, Transition Efficient to Low- Growth in Carbon Global Propulsion Operations Innovation in Real-Time Commercial System- Supersonic Wide Aircraft Safety Assurance Assured Ultra-Efficient Autonomy for Commercial Aviation Vehicles Transformation NASA Centers and Installations Goddard Institute for Space Studies Plum Brook Glenn Research Station Independent Center Verification and Ames Validation Facility Research Center Goddard Space Flight Center Headquarters Jet Propulsion Wallops Laboratory Flight Facility Armstrong Flight Research Center Langley Research White Sands Center Test Facility Stennis Marshall Space Kennedy Johnson Space Space Michoud Flight Center Space Center Center Assembly Center Facility
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission FCC 09-51
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 09-51 FCC REPORT TO CONGRESS AS REQUIRED BY THE ORBIT ACT TENTH REPORT Adopted: June 12, 2009 Released: June 15, 2009 Federal Communications Commission FCC 09-51 FCC REPORT TO CONGRESS AS REQUIRED BY THE ORBIT ACT TENTH REPORT This report is submitted in accordance with Section 646 of the Open-Market Reorganization for the Betterment of International Telecommunications Act (the “ORBIT Act”).1 Section 646 states: (a) ANNUAL REPORTS - The President and the Commission shall report to the Committees on Commerce and International Relations of the House of Representatives and the Committees on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and Foreign Relations of the Senate within 90 calendar days of the enactment of this title, and not less than annually thereafter, on the progress made to achieve the objectives and carry out the purposes and provisions of this title. Such reports shall be made available immediately to the public. (b) CONTENTS OF REPORTS - The reports submitted pursuant to subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) Progress with respect to each objective since the most recent preceding report. (2) Views of the Parties with respect to privatization. (3) Views of the industry and consumers on privatization. (4) Impact privatization has had on United States industry, United States jobs, and United States industry’s access to the global marketplace. I. Progress as to Objectives and Purposes The purpose of the ORBIT Act is “to promote a fully competitive global market for satellite communication services for the benefit of consumers and providers of satellite services and equipment by fully privatizing the intergovernmental satellite organizations, INTELSAT and Inmarsat.”2 The ORBIT Act, as originally passed in 2000: (1) mandates the privatization of INTELSAT and Inmarsat; (2) establishes criteria to ensure a pro-competitive privatization; (3) requires the Commission to determine whether INTELSAT, Inmarsat, and the INTELSAT spin-off New Skies Satellites N.V.
    [Show full text]
  • An Elementary Approach Towards Satellite Communication
    AN ELEMENTARY APPROACH TOWARDS SATELLITE COMMUNICATION Prof. Dr. Hari Krishnan GOPAKUMAR Prof. Dr. Ashok JAMMI AN ELEMENTARY APPROACH TOWARDS SATELLITE COMMUNICATION Prof. Dr. Hari Krishnan GOPAKUMAR Prof. Dr. Ashok JAMMI AN ELEMENTARY APPROACH TOWARDS SATELLITE COMMUNICATION WRITERS Prof. Dr. Hari Krishnan GOPAKUMAR Prof. Dr. Ashok JAMMI Güven Plus Group Consultancy Inc. Co. Publications: 06/2021 APRIL-2021 Publisher Certificate No: 36934 E-ISBN: 978-605-7594-89-1 Güven Plus Group Consultancy Inc. Co. Publications All kinds of publication rights of this scientific book belong to GÜVEN PLUS GROUP CONSULTANCY INC. CO. PUBLICATIONS. Without the written permission of the publisher, the whole or part of the book cannot be printed, broadcast, reproduced or distributed electronically, mechanically or by photocopying. The responsibility for all information and content in this Book, visuals, graphics, direct quotations and responsibility for ethics / institutional permission belongs to the respective authors. In case of any legal negativity, the institutions that support the preparation of the book, especially GÜVEN PLUS GROUP CONSULTANCY INC. CO. PUBLISHING, the institution (s) responsible for the editing and design of the book, and the book editors and other person (s) do not accept any “material and moral” liability and legal responsibility and cannot be taken under legal obligation. We reserve our rights in this respect as GÜVEN GROUP CONSULTANCY “PUBLISHING” INC. CO. in material and moral aspects. In any legal problem/situation TURKEY/ISTANBUL courts are authorized. This work, prepared and published by Güven Plus Group Consultancy Inc. Co., has ISO: 10002: 2014- 14001: 2004-9001: 2008-18001: 2007 certificates. This work is a branded work by the TPI “Turkish Patent Institute” with the registration number “Güven Plus Group Consultancy Inc.
    [Show full text]