DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents Publisher’S Note

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Contents Publisher’S Note Table of Contents Publisher’s Note . ix Editor’s Introduction . xi Contributors . xiii VOLUME 1 Postwar Cold War Potsdam Agreement . 3 Stalin’s Election Speech, 1946 . 17 Churchill’s “ Iron Curtain” Speech . 25 Truman Doctrine Speech . 34 Speech on the Marshall Plan . 40 “The Sources of Soviet Content” . 45 Inter-American Treaty of Reciprocal Assistance (Rio Treaty) . 57 Vyshinky’s Speech to the UN General Assembly . 64 NATO Treaty . 68 Memorandum on Lifting the Soviet Blockade . 72 Dean Acheson on the “Loss” of China . 75 Atomic Explosion in the USSR . 79 International Control of Atomic Energy . 82 NSC 68: “United States Objectives and Programs for National Security” . 91 Report to the American People on Korea and US Policy in the Far East . 97 Statement by President Truman upon Signing the Mutual Security Act . .103 President Eisenhower—“The Chance for Peace” . .107 Mutual Defense Treaty between the United States and the Republic of Korea . .114 A “New Look” at National Defense Policy . .118 “Atoms for Peace” . .125 CIA Summary of the Overthrow of Premier Mossadeq of Iran . .132 Balkan Pact . .138 President Eisenhower to the President of the Council of Ministers of Vietnam . .143 Sino-American Mutual Defense Treaty . .146 Baghdad Pact . .150 President Sukarno's Address at the Bandung Conference . .154 Warsaw Pact . .163 v Khrushchev on the “Cult of Personality” and Its Consequences . .167 Senator John F. Kennedy on America’s Stake in Vietnam . .176 Resolution of Hungarian Student Protestors . .182 Mao on the “Correct Handling of Contradictions among the People” . .186 Launching of the Sputnik Satellite . .195 Eisenhower on Science in National Security . .199 “Communism in the Americas” . .206 Fidel Castro’s Speech at Twenty-One Nations Conference . .214 Nixon and Khrushchev: The Kitchen Debate . .219 Antarctic Treaty . .224 Red Scare Executive Order 9835 . .233 Testimony of J. Edgar Hoover before the House Un-American Activities Committee . .241 Ronald Reagan’s Testimony before the House Un-American Activities Committee . .246 Testimony Regarding Communist Investigations . .251 Testimony of Whittaker Chambers (Excerpted) . .256 Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Speech to the Republican Women's Club of Wheeling, West Virginia . .262 “Declaration of Conscience” . .266 Rosenberg Case Excerpts . .272 In the Matter of J. Robert Oppenheimer . .280 Censure of Senator Joseph McCarthy . .287 VOLUME 2 Escalation and Détente The U2 Spy-Plane—Excerpts of a Speech by Khrushchev . .293 Eisenhower’s Farewell Address . .298 Telegram from the US Mission in Berlin regarding the Sealing-off of East Berlin . .303 Fidel Castro: Second Declaration of Havana . .307 JFK: “We Choose to Go to the Moon” . .311 JFK: Report on the Soviet Arms Buildup in Cuba . .316 vi JFK: “A Strategy of Peace” . .322 JFK: “Ich bin ein Berliner” . .329 Televised Interview with President Kennedy . .333 Limited Test Ban Treaty . .339 On Alleged Soviet and Cuban Connections with Lee Harvey Oswald . .343 The Gulf of Tonkin Incident . .347 LBJ: “Peace Without Conquest” . .351 Treaty on the Exploration and Use of Outer Space . .358 The “Two Thousand Words” Manifesto . .364 Nixon on the “Silent Majority” and “Vietnamization” . .368 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty . .378 Kissinger Memo regarding Policy toward Chile . .384 Nuclear Accidents Measures Agreement . .391 Documents Relating to Normalization of Relations between the United States and the People's Republic of China . .395 Biological Weapons Convention . .401 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty . .406 Jackson-Vanik Amendment . .412 Helsinki Accords (Excerpt) . .416 Margaret Thatcher’s “ Iron Lady” Speech . .419 US Contingency Plans in Light of Cuban-Soviet Intervention in Angola . .426 Charter 77 . .431 SALT II . .436 End Game Documents Relating to the Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan . .443 CIA Cable on the Situation in Poland . .448 Ronald Reagan's “Evil Empire” Speech . .452 Able Archer ‘83: The Soviet “War Scare” . .459 Ronald Reagan on the Strategic Defense Initiative . .467 Ronald Reagan's “Tear Down This Wall” Speech . .471 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 50Th Anniversary of Kennedy's Berlin Speech: Berlin Meets Washington
    50th Anniversary of Kennedy's Berlin Speech: Berlin Meets Washington Berlin/Washington, June 25, 2013 "Ich bin ein Berliner". These are the words most remembered from the famous speech given by President John F. Kennedy in Berlin 50 years ago on June 26, 1963. To commemorate this important anniversary, the German capital will be in Washington on June 26–27, 2013 to reintroduce itself to the people of America. President Barack Obama gave a speech at the Brandenburg Gate a week ago on June 19 during his visit to Berlin, citing Kennedy's significant words. The focus of the Washington trip is not only to commemorate Kennedy, but also to present Berlin as a hub for tourism and conventions in the heart of Europe, and as Europe's center of innovation. The delegation representing the city of Berlin on the Washington trip includes the Senator for the Interior Affairs and Mayor Frank Henkel and the CEO of visitBerlin, Burkhard Kieker. Frank Henkel, Senator for the Interior Affairs, Sports and Mayor, remarks: "For me, an important aim of this trip to Washington is to honor the great President John F. Kennedy and to remember his legendary speech in Berlin 50 years ago. With his visit to our divided city and his commitment, Kennedy was making much more than just a polite gesture. His words demonstrated an unprecedented level of respect for the people of West and East Berlin's unfaltering desire to be free. We Berliners in particular have a lot to thank the Americans for. The foundations of our nations' deep and steadfast friendship can be found in Berlin and were laid by President Kennedy." "Berlin owes many thanks to John F.
    [Show full text]
  • Ich Bin Ein West-Berliner
    Zürcher Beiträge zur Sicherheitspolitik und Konfliktforschung Heft Nr. 49 Christof Münger Ich bin ein West-Berliner Der Wandel der amerikanischen Berlinpolitik während der Präsidentschaft John F. Kennedys Forschungsstelle für Sicherheitspolitik und Konfliktanalyse Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule 8092 Zürich Zürich 1999 FSK auf dem Internet Die „Zürcher Beiträge“ sowie die anderen Publikationen der Forschungsstelle für Sicherheits- politik und Konfliktanalyse sind ebenfalls auf dem World Wide Web im Volltext verfügbar. http://www.fsk.ethz.ch/ Inhaltsverzeichnis Vorwort.............................................................................................................1 Summary...........................................................................................................3 Abkürzungen.....................................................................................................6 Einleitung........................................................................................................11 PHASE I Von Kennedys Amtsantritt bis zu seiner TV-Rede zur dritten Berlinkrise: Der Krisenherd Berlin und die Suche der USA nach einer neuen Politik gegenüber der ehemaligen Reichshauptstadt 1 Die Rahmenbedingungen der sechziger Jahre und ihr Einfluss auf John F. Kennedys frühe Berlinpolitik........................................................29 1.1 Kennedys Reaktion auf die neuen Rahmenbedingungen...............................31 1.2 Die ersten Einschätzungen der Berlinfrage durch die Kennedy-Administration ...........................................................................40
    [Show full text]
  • A Legacy of Advocacy Is Born As AAI Confronts Mccarthyism
    AAI LOOKS BACK A Legacy of Advocacy Is Born as AAI Confronts McCarthyism by Bryan Peery and John Emrich Today, across-the-board cuts in federal funding for scientific research threaten to drive leading scientists overseas and deter the next generation from entering scientific professions. Sixty years ago, scientists had similar concerns for their own funding, albeit for very different reasons. lthough federal spending forf the business meeting late Awas on the rise in the ini the afternoon on Tuesday, decades immediately following AprilA 13. Rumors that the U.S. the Second World War, it was also PublicP Health Service (USPHS), the height of the Second Red whichw administered National Scare associated with Senator InstitutesI of Health (NIH) grants, Joseph McCarthy (R-WI), and wasw blacklisting scientists on scientists faced the possibility of politicalp grounds had circulated having their individual funding amonga attendees during the withheld on the basis of mere firstfi two days of the Federation rumor or innuendo about their ofo American Societies for past political associations. ExperimentalE Biology (FASEB) In this political climate, meeting.m Disturbed by these scientists increasingly turned rumors,r Michael Heidelberger Members off the HouseHouse Un-AmericanUn American ActivitiesActivities to their professional societies (AAI( ’35, president 1946–47, Committee outside of Chaiman J. Parnell Thomas’s 1948–49) brought the matter to defend their interests before home (l-r): Rep. Richard B. Vail, Rep. Thomas, Rep. John policy makers. The leadership McDowell, Robert Stripling (chief counsel), and Rep. to the floor of the business of the American Association of Richard M. Nixon meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • J. Edgar Hoover, "Speech Before the House Committee on Un‐American Activities" (26 March 1947)
    Voices of Democracy 3 (2008): 139‐161 Underhill 139 J. EDGAR HOOVER, "SPEECH BEFORE THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON UN‐AMERICAN ACTIVITIES" (26 MARCH 1947) Stephen Underhill University of Maryland Abstract: J. Edgar Hoover fought domestic communism in the 1940s with illegal investigative methods and by recommending a procedure of guilt by association to HUAC. The debate over illegal surveillance in the 1940s to protect national security reflects the on‐going tensions between national security and civil liberties. This essay explores how in times of national security crises, concerns often exist about civil liberties violations in the United States. Key Words: J. Edgar Hoover, Communism, Liberalism, National Security, Civil Liberties, Partisanship From Woodrow Wilson's use of the Bureau of Investigation (BI) to spy on radicals after World War I to Richard Nixon's use of the renamed Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to spy on U.S. "subversives" during Vietnam, the balance between civil liberties and national security has often been a contentious issue during times of national crisis.1 George W. Bush's use of the National Security Agency (NSA) to monitor the communications of suspected terrorists in the United States is but the latest manifestation of a tension that spans the existence of official intelligence agencies.2 The tumult between national security and civil liberties was also visible during the early years of the Cold War as Republicans and Democrats battled over the U.S. government's appropriate response to the surge of communism internationally. Entering the presidency in 1945, Harry S Truman became privy to the unstable dynamic between Western leaders and Josef Stalin over the post‐war division of Eastern Europe.3 Although only high level officials within the executive branch intimately understood this breakdown, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative National Security
    ARTICLES Administrative National Security ELENA CHACHKO* In the past two decades, the United States has applied a growing num- ber of foreign and security measures directly targeting individualsÐ natural or legal persons. These individualized measures have been designed and carried out by administrative agencies. Widespread appli- cation of individual economic sanctions, security watchlists and no-¯y lists, detentions, targeted killings, and action against hackers responsible for cyberattacks have all become signi®cant currencies of U.S. foreign and security policy. Although the application of each of these measures in discrete contexts has been studied, they have yet to attract an inte- grated analysis. This Article examines this phenomenon with two main aims. First, it documents what I call ªadministrative national securityº: the growing individualization of U.S. foreign and security policy, the administrative mechanisms that have facilitated it, and the judicial response to these mechanisms. Administrative national security encompasses several types of individualized measures that agencies now apply on a routine, inde®- nite basis through the exercise of considerable discretion within a broad framework established by Congress or the President. It is therefore best understood as an emerging practice of administrative adjudication in the foreign and security space. Second, this Article considers how administrative national security integrates with the presidency and the courts. Accounting for administra- tive national security illuminates the President's constitutional role as chief executive and commander-in-chief and his control of key aspects of * Lecturer on Law, Harvard Law School (Fall 2019); Post-doctoral Fellow, Perry World House, University of Pennsylvania; S.J.D. Candidate, Harvard Law School; LL.B., Hebrew University of Jerusalem (2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Minds Debate Whether Obama Executive Order on Abortion Will Stick
    Legal minds debate whether Obama executive order on abortion will stick WASHINGTON – One of the biggest questions remaining as implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act begins is whether the executive order on abortion funding signed by President Barack Obama will be effective in stopping any expanded use of taxpayer funds for abortion. Legal experts and members of Congress disagree about the impact of the president’s March 24 Executive Order 13535, “Ensuring Enforcement and Implementation of Abortion Restrictions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.” Anthony Picarello, general counsel for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, and Michael Moses, associate general counsel, said in a nine-page legal analysis that the executive order is likely to face court challenges and does not resolve problems on abortion funding and conscience protection in the health reform law. “Where the order purports to fix a shortcoming of the act in these areas, it is highly likely to be legally invalid; and where the order is highly likely to be legally valid, it does nothing to fix those shortcomings,” they said. Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., a key player in the health reform debate, said executive orders “have been important means of implementing public policy” throughout history, noting that President George W. Bush used Executive Order 13435 in 2007 to limit the use of federal funds for embryonic stem-cell research. “This executive order followed the principle of the sanctity of life, and was applauded and welcomed by the pro-life community,” said Stupak, a nine-term House member who recently announced that he would not run for re-election.
    [Show full text]
  • John F. Kennedy and Berlin Nicholas Labinski Marquette University
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Master's Theses (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects Evolution of a President: John F. Kennedy and Berlin Nicholas Labinski Marquette University Recommended Citation Labinski, Nicholas, "Evolution of a President: John F. Kennedy and Berlin" (2011). Master's Theses (2009 -). Paper 104. http://epublications.marquette.edu/theses_open/104 EVOLUTION OF A PRESIDENT: JOHN F. KENNEDYAND BERLIN by Nicholas Labinski A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Milwaukee, Wisconsin August 2011 ABSTRACT EVOLUTION OF A PRESIDENT: JOHN F. KENNEDYAND BERLIN Nicholas Labinski Marquette University, 2011 This paper examines John F. Kennedy’s rhetoric concerning the Berlin Crisis (1961-1963). Three major speeches are analyzed: Kennedy’s Radio and Television Report to the American People on the Berlin Crisis , the Address at Rudolph Wilde Platz and the Address at the Free University. The study interrogates the rhetorical strategies implemented by Kennedy in confronting Khrushchev over the explosive situation in Berlin. The paper attempts to answer the following research questions: What is the historical context that helped frame the rhetorical situation Kennedy faced? What rhetorical strategies and tactics did Kennedy employ in these speeches? How might Kennedy's speeches extend our understanding of presidential public address? What is the impact of Kennedy's speeches on U.S. German relations and the development of U.S. and German Policy? What implications might these speeches have for the study and execution of presidential power and international diplomacy? Using a historical-rhetorical methodology that incorporates the historical circumstances surrounding the crisis into the analysis, this examination of Kennedy’s rhetoric reveals his evolution concerning Berlin and his Cold War strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • End of Instruction Notes DAY 2 1949 NATO—North Atlantic Treaty
    End of Instruction Notes DAY 2 1949 NATO—North Atlantic Treaty Organization. When it became apparent the UN could not stop war and aggression, the former Allies signed this treaty stating, “armed attack against one or more of them…shall be considered an attack against all.” Truman did not allow the US to return to isolationism after WWII. Warsaw Pact—after NATO allowed West Germany to re-arm. Soviet Union responded by organizing a military alliance in Eastern Europe Soviets successfully test atomic bomb this led to the arms race with the US China turns communist with Mao Zedong 1950s 1950 Korean War—divided after WWII, by Allies occupying forces withdrew in 1948-49. North Korea invaded the south to reunite them. The Soviets were boycotting the UN. The UN voted to defend South Korea. Douglas MacArthur headed troops after years of fighting he wanted to push war harder and to consider the bomb. Truman disagreed. Mac went behind his back and Truman fired him. 1952--Communists took control of Iran. CIA overthrew communists and replaced with Shah 1953—President Eisenhower wants to end the Korean War—Stalin died—Korea divided on 48th parallel. Vietnam conflict starting. Eisenhower sends advisors. Latin America—US feared Soviets might try to spread communism there US first then the USSR tested nuclear bombs 1954—CIA overthrew Guatemala gov’t to replace with US friendly one 1957—Soviet uses ballistic missiles armed with nuclear warheads. US lags behind in missile technology. Soviets also launch Sputnik, 1st satellite to orbit the earth—this leads to the space race.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter from Senator Joseph Mccarthy to the President of the United States
    Letter from Senator Joseph McCarthy to the President of the United States This letter from Senator Joseph McCarthy, Republican representative of Wisconsin, to President Harry Truman was written three days after McCarthy’s famous Wheeling Speech. This speech signaled McCarthy’s rise to influence, as he gained national attention by producing a piece of paper on which he claimed he had listed the names of 205 members of the Communist Party working secretly in the U.S. State Department. McCarthy was, at the time of this letter, beginning to exploit national concerns about Communist infiltration during the Cold War. This fear of infiltration was intensified by the Soviet Union’s recent development of the atomic bomb and the coming Communist takeover of China. “McCarthyism” however was not yet at its peak. Senator McCarthy here at first encourages President Truman to commit more resources to the war of containment being fought in South Korea, and secondly questioned the legitimacy and effectiveness of Truman’s loyalty program, signed into effect by Executive Order 9835 in 1947. This program required the FBI to run checks on almost anyone involved in the U.S. government and subsequently to launch investigations into any government employee with what could be presumed as questionable political associations. The Loyalty Program was not enough to satisfy Senator McCarthy, who suspected that a number of subversives had slipped through the investigation and remained in the State Department. President Truman made it clear that he would not take McCarthy’s accusations seriously and that the Senator was “the best asset the Kremlin has.”109 July 12, 1950 The President The White House Washington, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Address Given by John F. Kennedy: 'Ich Bin Ein Berliner' (Berlin, 26 June 1963)
    Address given by John F. Kennedy: 'Ich bin ein Berliner' (Berlin, 26 June 1963) Source: President John F. Kennedy at City Hall, West Berlin / John F. Kennedy.- Berlin: Voice of America (VOA), United States Information Agency (USIA) [Prod.], 26 juin 1963. National Archives Record and Administration (NARA), College Park. - SON (00:03:33, Montage, Son original). National Archives and Record Administration, College Park, 8601 Adelphi Road. COAL. NWDNM(s)-306- ENL-T-3906. Copyright: Transcription CVCE.EU by UNI.LU All rights of reproduction, of public communication, of adaptation, of distribution or of dissemination via Internet, internal network or any other means are strictly reserved in all countries. Consult the legal notice and the terms and conditions of use regarding this site. URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/address_given_by_john_f_kennedy_ich_bin_ein_berliner_b erlin_26_june_1963-en-6b0ffce8-3054-4b5b-bd7b-67df1ec9e8f8.html Last updated: 04/07/2016 1/2 Address given by John F. Kennedy: 'Ich bin ein Berliner' (Berlin, 26 June 1963) [John F. Kennedy] Thank you. There are many people in the world who really don't understand, or say they don't, what is the great issue between the free world and the Communist world. Let them come to Berlin. There are some who say that communism is the wave of the future. Let them come to Berlin. And there are even a few who say that it is true that communism is an evil system, but it permits us to make economic progress. Lass' sie nach Berlin kommen. Let them come to Berlin. Freedom has many difficulties and democracy is not perfect, but we have never had to put a wall up to keep our people in, to prevent them from leaving us.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cold War
    The American Yawp Chapter 25 – The Cold War Quiz 1. What was the first military action taken by the United States against international communism? a. American soldiers fought against the Red Army during the Russian civil war b. American soldiers fought isolated battles against the Soviet Union during World War II c. The Berlin Airlift d. The Korean War 2. Greece and Turkey were early flashpoints in the Cold War. How did the United States respond to unrest in Greece and Turkey in 1947? a. The United States established long range missiles in these nations, capable of reaching Moscow b. The United States sent military advisers to train anti-communist forces in both countries c. The United States actively intervened in Greece but not in Turkey d. The United States sent $400 million to both nations to be used in resisting communism 3. What was the purpose of the Marshall Plan? a. Rebuild Western Europe b. Create new markets for American goods c. Generate support for Capitalist democracies d. All of the above 4. When was the Atlantic Charter issued? a. After World War I b. Before the United States entered World War II c. After World War II d. When the Soviet Union invaded Korea 5. What was the message of NSC-68? a. A warning that the idea of the domino theory may represent a slippery slope commitment that would result in dozens of new wars b. An economic argument for isolationism c. A call for a tripling of the annual defense budget for the purpose of stopping communism d.
    [Show full text]
  • Loyalty Among Government Employees
    THE YALE LAW JOURNAL VOLUME 58 DECE-MBER, 1948 Nu-.mnB 1 LOYALTY AMONG GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES THOMAS I. EMERSON* DAVID M. HELFELD t I. BACKGROUNM MOUNTING tensions in our society have brought us to a critical point in the matter of political and civil rights. The stresses are in large measure internal. They grow out of the accelerating movement to effect far-reaching changes in our economic and social structure, a movement which evokes ever-increasing resistance. As the conflicts sharpen, there is rising pressure to discard or undermine the basic principles embodied in the democratic concept of freedom for political opposition. Maintenance of free institutions in a period of deepening crisis would be difficult enough if the struggle were confined to our shores. But the domestic problem is only an element of the world problem. Large areas of the world have abandoned the system of capitalism in favor of socialism. Other areas are far advanced in economic and social change. Everywhere there is struggle, uncertainty, fear and confusion. Pro- tagonists of the more militant economic and social philosophies are organized into political parties which have their offshoots and counter- parts in other countries, including our owm. As a result, the preserva- tion of political freedom, the right to hold and express opinions di- verging from the opinion of the majority, is often made to appear incompatible with the overriding requirements of "loyalty," "patri- otism," "national security" and the like. The danger of "foreign id- eologies," "infiltration," "subversion" and "espionage" are invoked to justify the suspension of traditional rights and freedoms.
    [Show full text]