Viral and Bacterial Diseases of Atlantic Cod Gadus Morhua, Their Prophylaxis and Treatment: a Review
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Vol. 71: 239–254, 2006 Published August 30 Dis Aquat Org OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS REVIEW Viral and bacterial diseases of Atlantic cod Gadus morhua, their prophylaxis and treatment: a review Ole B. Samuelsen1,*, Audun H. Nerland1, Trond Jørgensen2, Merete Bjørgan Schrøder2, Terje Svåsand1, Øivind Bergh1 1Institute of Marine Research, PO Box 1870, Nordnes, 5817 Bergen, Norway 2Department of Marine Biotechnology, NFH, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway ABSTRACT: This review summarises the state of knowledge of both viral and bacterial diseases of Atlantic cod Gadus morhua, and their diagnosis, prophylaxis and treatment. The most important losses have been at the larval and juvenile stages, and vibriosis has long been the most important bacterial disease in cod, with Listonella (Vibrio) anguillarum dominant among pathogenic isolates. Vaccination of cod against pathogens such as L. anguillarum and Aeromonas salmonicida clearly demonstrates that the cod immune system possesses an effective memory and appropriate mecha- nisms sufficient for protection, at least against some diseases. Well-known viruses such as the nodavirus that causes viral encephalopathy and retinopathy (VER), infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV) and viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus (VHSV) have been isolated from Atlantic cod and can be a potential problem under intensive rearing conditions. No commercial vaccines against nodavirus are currently available, whereas vaccines against IPNV infections based upon inactivated virus as well as IPNV recombinant antigens are available. A number of investigations of the pharma- cokinetic properties of antibacterial agents in cod and their efficacy in treating bacterial infections have been reviewed. KEY WORDS: Atlantic cod · Diseases · Prophylaxis · Treatment Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher INTRODUCTION diseases of Atlantic cod, as well as the present knowl- edge on the pharmacokinetics of antibacterial agents, The increased focus on aquaculture of Atlantic cod treatment and prophylaxis. Gadus morhua (Svåsand et al. 2004) has brought renewed attention to the diseases of this species, and to the treatment and prophylaxis of these diseases. OCCURRENCE AND COMMERCIAL PRODUCTION There are many reports on cod diseases, mainly on wild stocks (see for instance the review on vibriosis by Atlantic cod Gadus morhua is one of the best-known Egidius 1987), but a side-effect of domestication of cold-water species in the world, has been traded for a a ‘new’ species is the unavoidable increased focus on millennium on 4 continents (Kurlansky 1999), and has its diseases, their prophylaxis and treatment (Bergh now also become a candidate for aquaculture (Svåsand et al. 2001). et al. 2004). The parasites of Atlantic cod were reviewed by Atlantic cod are distributed on both sides of the Hemmingsen & MacKenzie (2001). This subject is Atlantic. In the west Atlantic, cod are found from Cape therefore not included in this review. The purpose of Hatteras north to the ice edge and, in the east Atlantic, the present paper is to review the viral and bacterial from the Bay of Biscay in the south to the northern part *Email: [email protected] © Inter-Research 2006 · www.int-res.com 240 Dis Aquat Org 71: 239–254, 2006 of the Barents Sea (Bergstad et al. 1987). Atlantic cod light (Hansen et al. 2001), thereby removing an impor- occur as several stocks, each of which has its own dis- tant bottleneck to viable cod farming. After several tinct life-history characteristics and migration patterns years, during which time interest in cod aquaculture (Jakobsson et al. 1994). remained low, a series of new research projects was In European waters, as in the rest of the world, wild launched, and private companies built large-scale stocks of Atlantic cod have declined steadily throughout hatcheries for the rearing of Atlantic cod (Svåsand et the past few decades (Fig. 1). In parallel with the declin- al. 2004). While the previous juvenile production used ing wild stocks, considerable efforts have been put into semi-natural rearing systems, production was now developing Atlantic cod farming (Svåsand et al. 2004). shifted to intensive rearing, which provided more con- This research has its roots as far back as the1880s, when trol over the rearing environment (Fig. 2). attempts were initiated in Norway, the USA and Canada to stock the sea with millions of newly hatched yolk sac larvae. This activity was continued for nearly 90 yr, VIRAL DISEASES AFFECTING ATLANTIC COD although no benefits of the releases were ever deter- mined (Shelbourne 1964, Solemdal et al. 1984). How- Nodaviruses ever, this laid the foundations for later successes in the farming of marine species. Nodaviruses are small viruses (25 to 30 nm) with a From the 1970s onwards, there was renewed interest very simple architecture. The genome consists of 2 in the cultivation of Atlantic cod, both as a species for positive-sense, single-stranded RNA segments: RNA1 farming and for stock enhancement (Dahl et al. 1984). (3100 nt), which encodes the RNA-dependent RNA Finally, in 1983, researchers at the Institute of Marine polymerase responsible for the replication of the Research in Norway managed to produce 70 000 juve- genome, and RNA2 (1400 nt), which encodes the cap- nile cod in a seawater enclosure (Øiestad et al. 1985). In sid protein that builds up the icosahedral capsid into the following years, juvenile Atlantic cod were pro- which the genome is packaged. In addition, there is a duced both for cod farming and for stock enhancement, third RNA segment, RNA3, generated sub-genomi- using seawater enclosures or semi-natural rearing sys- cally from RNA1 and encoding a polypeptide of tems. Interest in cage rearing was, however, less in the unknown function. RNA3 is present only in the late 1980s, due to low profitability, mainly caused by infected cells and is not packaged into the viral parti- early maturation and low prices for cod (Svåsand et al. cles (Mori et al. 1992, Nishizawa et al. 1995, Grotmol et 2004). From 1990 to 1999, the main focus shifted to sea al. 2000, Sommerset & Nerland 2004). ranching. However, sea ranching of Atlantic cod also Viruses with this architecture were first isolated from turned out to be unprofitable (Svåsand et al. 2000), and insects (denoted alpha-nodavirus) (Scherer & Hurlbut further activities were stopped. 1967), later from fish (denoted beta-nodavirus) (Mori et Under culture conditions Atlantic cod mature 2 yr al. 1992) and more recently from Crustacea (Bonami et after hatching. In the late 1990s, researchers at the al. 1997). However, the homologies of the genomes at Institute of Marine Research in Norway succeeded in the nucleotide or amino acid level between the alpha-, postponing the maturation of cod by means of artificial beta-nodaviruses and those isolated from Crustacea are remarkably low. It may therefore be 3000000 that these viruses do not have a common origin, but just happen to have a similar 2500000 organisation. The main target organ for nodavirus 2000000 infection of fish is the central nervous sys- tem (CNS), including the brain, spinal cord 1500000 and retina, where it causes extensive cel- lular vacuolation and neuronal degenera- 1000000 Catch in tonnes tion (Mori et al. 1992). The disease is there- fore referred to as either viral ence- 500000 phalopathy and retinopathy (VER) or viral nervous necrosis (VNN). In general, the 0 clinical signs relate to neurological distor- tion: abnormalities of movement such as 1950 1953 1956 1959 1962 1965 1968 1971 1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 Year uncoordinated swimming, tonic spasms of Fig. 1. Gadus morhus. Wild catch of Atlantic cod in Europe from 1950 to 2005 myotomal musculature, lethargy, change (www.fao.org) of pigmentation and loss of appetite. Samuelsen et al.: Viral and bacterial diseases of Atlantic cod 241 Fig. 2. Gadus morhus. Production of juvenile cod (>10 g) in Norway, UK and Canada. Redrawn from data by Svåsand et al. (2004) Nodavirus infection particularly affects the larval or netic analyses of the variable region of the viral capsid juvenile stages of fish, in which mortality may be very gene (Nishizawa et al. 1995, 1997, Dalla Valle et al. high. In the Atlantic halibut Hippoglossus hippoglos- 2001). sus outbreaks of this disease are most often seen dur- How nodaviruses are transmitted is not fully under- ing first feeding and weaning (40 to 100 d post-hatch- stood. In theory, the virus can be transmitted vertically ing), although yolk-sac stages may also be affected from the broodfish via the eggs or sperm, or may enter (Grotmol et al. 1997, 1999). However, in recent years, the rearing unit through the inlet water or from the significant mortalities have occurred in older fish up to feed and then spread horizontally. Recent reports have harvesting size (Fukuda et al. 1996, LeBreton et al. shown that the virus can persist for a long time in sub- 1997, Aspehaug et al. 1999). clinically infected fish and still be infectious (Johansen The simple organisation of the nodavirus particle et al. 2004). The virus has been detected in gonads and may explain why viruses from this family are able to in association with eggs, and experimental vertical replicate in cells from a variety of species. Aside from transmission has been demonstrated in sea bass (Breuil insect cells, alpha-nodavirus has been shown to be et al. 2002). We have detected very high concentra- able to replicate in mammalian (Ball 1992), plant (Sell- tions of nodavirus in rearing units in which infected ing et al. 1990) and yeast (Price et al. 1996) cells as soon halibut larvae were held, indicating that horizontal as the virus particles have entered the cells. It is the transmission may take place. It is therefore tempting to only virus originating from higher eukaryotic organ- speculate that normal transmission is vertical, from isms that has been found able to replicate in yeast subclinically infected parents to the larvae, and as a cells.