DOCSLIB.ORG

Committee on NASA Science Mission Extensions Steven W

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Committee on NASA Science Mission Extensions Steven W Committee on NASA Science Mission Extensions Steven W. Clarke, Director NAS Keck Center, Washington DC Heliophysics Division February 1-2, 2016 Science Mission Directorate NASA Heliophysics Strategic Goal: Understand the Sun and its interactions with Earth and the solar system, including space weather Solar Terrestrial Solve the fundamental physics mysteries Explorers Probes of heliophysics: Explore and examine the physical processes in the space environment from the sun to the Earth and throughout the solar system. Build the knowledge to forecast space Smaller flight programs, Strategic Mission competed science topics, Flight Programs weather throughout the heliosphere: Develop the knowledge and capability to often PI-led detect and predict extreme conditions in Living With a Star space to protect life and society and to Research safeguard human and robotic explorers beyond Earth. Understand the nature of our home in space: Advance our understanding of the connections that link the sun, the Earth, Scientific research projects Strategic Mission planetary space environments, and the utilizing existing data plus Flight Programs outer reaches of our solar system. theory and modeling 2 2 Heliophysics Mission Portfolio Given the substantial investment the US government makes in these missions, it is prudent and reasonable to maximize the science return on these investments. Over the course of almost 2 decades (starting 1997), NASA Heliophysics has implemented the Senior Review process which calls upon the science community to help assess the scientific productivity and value of missions operating past their original design lifetimes, and provide to NASA, as one of the findings, a rank-ordered list of those missions. This findings have significant input into the future planning of the Heliophysics portfolio, in terms of directing the evolution of the portfolio (i.e. are there physical regimes missing?), and the annual budget allocation. 3 Heliophysics Mission Portfolio • The different classes of missions come with different levels of complexity, scientific capability, and requirements for location in space. These factors will lead to cost differentials, and levels of risk that the Agency is willing to accept. • Larger, more complex missions will be more expensive, and so the Agency will expect broader scientific return, will accept the need to develop new technologies and new capabilities, and will be less risk tolerant leading to additional testing and redundancy requirements. – These correspond to NASA Class A and Class B missions • Smaller, less complex missions will be expected to have more focused scientific objectives and to leverage existing technologies and capabilities; the Agency is more risk tolerant leading to acceptance of selected single-string systems and tailoring of mission assurance requirements. – These correspond to NASA Class C and Class D missions 4 Heliophysics Mission Portfolio Heliophysics missions reflect the primary classes of SMD missions • Strategic Missions – Initiated by NASA generally in response to recommendations in the Decadal Survey – NASA-led strategic heliophysics missions are generally in the large or medium mission class – NASA also initiates strategic partnerships with other space agencies, generally resulting in a NASA contribution to a partner-led mission • PI-led competed missions – Initiated by a PI-led team in the form of an Heliophysics Explorers proposal to NASA, either for a full mission or a mission of opportunity – Helioophysics Explorers full mission classes are small (SMEX) and medium (MIDEX) size – Mission of opportunity classes included contributions to a partner-led mission, small complete missions for the cost of a MO, and suborbital-class missions Examples Full Mission Contribution Strategic MMS, SPP Solar Orbiter Competed ICON, GOLD CINDI, TWINS 5 Heliophysics System Observatory Heliophysics Mission Timeline 1995-2025 Heliophysics Mission Timeline 3 Why Extend Missions? Heliophysics is a field that encompasses a number of sub-discipline areas which are all intimately interconnected: • Solar physics: the processes on the Sun and its extended outer atmosphere (photosphere, chromoshere, and corona) and the kinetics driving these observed phenomena inside the star. The Sun is mildly variable with a periodicity of ~22 years; • Solar wind and the heliosphere: the region between the outer corona and the planets encompassing the entire solar system out to ~121 AU (as measured by Voyager 1) containing all manner and energies of particles, waves, and fields; • The magnetosphere: an extremely complex and dynamic region around the Earth caused by the existence of the Earth’s magnetic field which responds dramatically with solar wind variations; • The ionosphere, thermosphere, and mesosphere (ITM): the upper portions of the Earth’s atmosphere, which also respond to solar wind variations as part of the connection of the Sun to the Earth. The Sun’s 22 year cycle means that phenomena in differing places within this complex, coupled system will look differently depending on where, and when in the solar cycle one observes them. 8 Why Extend Missions? SMD selects missions on the basis of science goals that are important at the time of their selections, whether as a Decadal priority or through a competitive selection. However, almost every mission will produce serendipitous results that were unexpected and which will further our understanding of the physical processes that move the Heliophysics discipline forward, and these discoveries are typically made by missions in extended operations. As an example, Voyagers 1 & 2 were launched in 1977 and after their planetary encounters, were extended by a number of Senior Reviews as they traversed the solar system. The particle, wave, and fields experiments of the two Voyager spacecraft have provided the only in-situ measurements of the outer heliosphere: something never planned in the original mission concept. By extending the missions to the early 21st century, we now have the first-ever measurements of space beyond the heliopause: interstellar space. This could only be accomplished by extending the mission to the present date. 9 Why Extend Missions? Another example, is from the Thermosphere, Ionosphere, Mesosphere, Energetics and Dynamics (TIMED) mission which studies the thermosphere, ionosphere and mesosphere of the Earth (the end of the Sun to Earth interaction). It has confirmed the surprisingly fast CO2 increase in the upper atmosphere raising questions of interconnectivity. And while most climate models predict an increase to be roughly equal across the globe, TIMED has observed a faster, preferred increase in the northern hemisphere. Finding such an unexpected trend is only possible because of the 14 years that TIMED has been in operation, as opposed to the original 2 year prime mission. A final example is the simultaneous, full 360o degree view of the Sun by STEREO. Working with SDO, STEREO has enabled, for the first time, uninterrupted observations of an active region on the Sun as it emerges, develops, and decays over several weeks or months. This could only be accomplished during the extended STEREO mission. 10 Why Extend Missions? To place the opportunity costs for the extended operations of the Heliophysics suite of missions in context, in FY16, the entire Heliophysics budget is $640M. The entire portfolio of all operational Heliophysics missions is $108.3M (this includes MMS, which is in its prime mission). If one excludes MMS, then the total for all the extended operating missions is $78.1M. This represents 12% of the entire Heliophysics budget for this fiscal year, or an average investment of $4.6M per mission. Indeed if one were to breakdown the cost per satellite (because some missions have multiple spacecraft involved) the average cost per satellite is even lower, at $2.8M. 11 NASA Heliophysics What fractions of your division’s budget are going towards missions in development, prime phase of operations, and extended phase(s)? FY2016 Heliophysics Budget Research 68,658 11% Development 352,027 55% Prime(MMS) 30,138 5% Operating Missions 78,170 12% Management and Other 19,811 3% Data Systems 19,890 3% Suborbital 71,420 11% Total 640,114 12 NASA Heliophysics Please list the missions currently in operational mission phase. 13 NASA Heliophysics What methods (including any metrics) are in place to review mission performance and what criteria are used to assess prospects for extensions? The reviews NASA carries out for mission extensions (Senior Reviews) take a number of factors into account: Scientific merit; Promise of future impact and Productivity; Progress towards previously agreed-to Prioritized Mission Objectives (PMOs); Impact of past scientific results; Accessibility, usability, and utility of data; Spacecraft and instrument health & safety; Productivity and vitality of the science team; Level and quality of the stewardship of the asset; Effectiveness of communications to the general public. 14 NASA Heliophysics Please describe (briefly) the senior review process currently used by your division to assess operating missions which are candidates for extension. The Senior Review assists NASA in maximizing the scientific productivity from its operating missions within a constrained budget. NASA uses the findings from the Senior Review to: – Prioritize continued funding of the operating missions and projects; – Define an implementation approach to achieve heliophysics strategic objectives; – Provide programmatic and budgetary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Shock Connectivity and the Late Cycle 24 Solar Energetic Particle Events in July and September 2017
    Shock Connectivity and the Late Cycle 24 Solar Energetic Particle Events in July and September 2017 J.G. Luhmann1, M.L. Mays2, Yan Li1, C.O. Lee1, H. Bain3, D. Odstrcil4, R.A. Mewaldt5, C.M.S. Cohen5, D. Larson1, Gordon Petrie6 1Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley. 2CCMC, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. 3NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center. 4George Mason University. 5California Institute of Technology. 6NSO. Corresponding author: Janet Luhmann ([email protected]) Key Points: Observer shock connectivity explains the SEP observations during the July and September 2017 events. The July and September 2017 solar and SEP events had similar characteristics due to similar source region and eruptions. The July and September 2017 events seemed to arise in conjunction with the appearance of a pseudostreamer, a possible alternate ICME source. This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi: 10.1029/2018SW001860 © 2018 American Geophysical Union. All rights reserved. Abstract As solar activity steadily declined toward the cycle 24 minimum in the early months of 2017, the expectation for major Solar Energetic Particle (SEP) events diminished with the sunspot number. It was thus surprising (though not unprecedented) when a new, potentially significant active region rotated around the East limb in early July that by mid-month was producing a series of coronal eruptions, reaching a crescendo around July 23. This series, apparently associated with the birth of a growing pseudostreamer, produced the largest SEP event(s) seen since the solar maximum years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Van Allen Probes' Contribution to the Space Weather System
    L. J. Zanetti et al. The Van Allen Probes’ Contribution to the Space Weather System Lawrence J. Zanetti, Ramona L. Kessel, Barry H. Mauk, Aleksandr Y. Ukhorskiy, Nicola J. Fox, Robin J. Barnes, Michele Weiss, Thomas S. Sotirelis, and NourEddine Raouafi ABSTRACT The Van Allen Probes mission, formerly the Radiation Belt Storm Probes mission, was renamed soon after launch to honor the late James Van Allen, who discovered Earth’s radiation belts at the beginning of the space age. While most of the science data are telemetered to the ground using a store-and-then-dump schedule, some of the space weather data are broadcast continu- ously when the Probes are not sending down the science data (approximately 90% of the time). This space weather data set is captured by contributed ground stations around the world (pres- ently Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute and the Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Czech Republic), automatically sent to the ground facility at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Phys- ics Laboratory, converted to scientific units, and published online in the form of digital data and plots—all within less than 15 minutes from the time that the data are accumulated onboard the Probes. The real-time Van Allen Probes space weather information is publicly accessible via the Van Allen Probes Gateway web interface. INTRODUCTION The overarching goal of the study of space weather ing radiation, were the impetus for implementing a space is to understand and address the issues caused by solar weather broadcast capability on NASA’s Van Allen disturbances and the effects of those issues on humans Probes’ twin pair of satellites, which were launched in and technological systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Industry at the Edge of Space Other Springer-Praxis Books of Related Interest by Erik Seedhouse
    IndustryIndustry atat thethe EdgeEdge ofof SpaceSpace ERIK SEEDHOUSE S u b o r b i t a l Industry at the Edge of Space Other Springer-Praxis books of related interest by Erik Seedhouse Tourists in Space: A Practical Guide 2008 ISBN: 978-0-387-74643-2 Lunar Outpost: The Challenges of Establishing a Human Settlement on the Moon 2008 ISBN: 978-0-387-09746-6 Martian Outpost: The Challenges of Establishing a Human Settlement on Mars 2009 ISBN: 978-0-387-98190-1 The New Space Race: China vs. the United States 2009 ISBN: 978-1-4419-0879-7 Prepare for Launch: The Astronaut Training Process 2010 ISBN: 978-1-4419-1349-4 Ocean Outpost: The Future of Humans Living Underwater 2010 ISBN: 978-1-4419-6356-7 Trailblazing Medicine: Sustaining Explorers During Interplanetary Missions 2011 ISBN: 978-1-4419-7828-8 Interplanetary Outpost: The Human and Technological Challenges of Exploring the Outer Planets 2012 ISBN: 978-1-4419-9747-0 Astronauts for Hire: The Emergence of a Commercial Astronaut Corps 2012 ISBN: 978-1-4614-0519-1 Pulling G: Human Responses to High and Low Gravity 2013 ISBN: 978-1-4614-3029-2 SpaceX: Making Commercial Spacefl ight a Reality 2013 ISBN: 978-1-4614-5513-4 E r i k S e e d h o u s e Suborbital Industry at the Edge of Space Dr Erik Seedhouse, M.Med.Sc., Ph.D., FBIS Milton Ontario Canada SPRINGER-PRAXIS BOOKS IN SPACE EXPLORATION ISBN 978-3-319-03484-3 ISBN 978-3-319-03485-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-03485-0 Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2013956603 © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 This work is subject to copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump-Biden Differences Laid Bare in Final Debate
    MOST OF WHAT WE CALL TODAY 1260 1920 1962 2008 QUOTE MANAGEMENT CONSISTS OF IN OF THE MAKING IT DIFFICULT FOR PEOPLE Qutuz, Mamluk Sultans of Egypt “Black Thursday”, start Cuban Missile Crisis: Soviet “Bloody Friday” saw many of the DAY HISTORY (1259-60), is assassinated by Bai- of stock market crash, ships approach but stop world’s stock exchanges experienced TO GET THEIR WORK DONE bars, a fellow Mamluk leader, who Dow Jones down 12.8% short of the US blockade of the worst declines in their history, with SATURDAY, OCTOBER 24, 2020 PETER DRUCKER seizes power for himself Cuba drops of around 10% in most indices News in brief Xi invokes S Korea finds no link between flu u South Chinese Korea’s forensic TOP shot, boy’s death as toll rises agency has Sudan to normalise ties military might Trump-Biden differences found no links between a 17-year-old boy’s death and a flu shot he had taken, with US in mind 4 the Yonhap news agency reported, TWEETS amid rising concerns about the safety of the vaccines following the death of at least 32 people. The boy was among with Israel, Trump says laid bare in final debate 01 the first reported to have died as part of a government campaign to vaccinate about 30 million of a population of 52 million to prevent coronavirus complications. US President Donald Trump announces that Sudan and Israel have agreed to the Donald Trump and Joe Biden fight over the raging virus, climate and race u Alessandra Korap of the Brazilian indigenous leader wins normalisation of relations Munduruku tribe Robert Kennedy rights award in the Amazon was awarded the 2020 Robert Biden mauls Trump’s ’m running as a proud F.
    [Show full text]
  • July 2, 2010 FROM: NASA Heliophysics Subcommittee Chair
    DATE: July 2, 2010 FROM: NASA Heliophysics Subcommittee Chair: Dr. Roy Torbert, Univ of New Hampshire Dr. David Alexander, Rice University Dr. Stuart Bale, University of California, Berkeley Dr. Jeffrey Forbes of the University of Colorado Dr. Mary Hudson, Dartmouth College Dr. Charles Kankelborg, Montana State University Dr. Judith Karpen of the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Dr. Robert McPherron of University of California, Los Angeles Dr. Richard Mewaldt, California Institute of Technology D r. Zoran Mikic, Predictive Science, Inc. Dr. Ennio Sanchez of SRI International Dr. Karel Schrijver of Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center Dr. Harlan Spence, formerly Boston University, now Univ of New Hampshire Dr. Charles Swenson, Utah State University Dr. Leonard Strachan of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Dr. Michelle Thomsen, Los Alamos National Laboratory Dr. Allan Tylka, Naval Research Laboratory TO: Dr. Wesley T. Huntress, NASA Advisory Council Science Committee Dear Wes, The Heliophysics Subcommittee (HPS) met at NASA Headquarters on June 30 and July 1, 2010. A total of 16 of the 17 members attended all or part of the meeting. The meeting agenda is attached to this letter. Several new members to the subcommittee were welcomed: Drs. Jeffrey Forbes, University of Colorado; Judy Karpen, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC); Ennio Sanchez, SRI International; Karel Schrijver, Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center; Leonard Strachan, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics; and Robert McPherron, University of California, Los Angeles. NASA gave one specific charge to the subcommittee for this meeting. The subcommittee was asked to provide an assessment of Heliophysics science performance for FY2009. This assessment is used as input to the yearly Performance and Accountability Report (PAR) submitted as part of NASA’s yearly Government Performance Results Act (GPRA) requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Living with a Star Targeted Research and Technology (TR&T) Steering
    Living with a Star Targeted Research and Technology (TR&T) Steering Committee Steering Committee Members: Liaison Members: Co-Chair: Eftyhia Zesta (GSFC) Terry Onsager (NOAA) Co-Chair: Mark Linton (NRL) Rodney Vierick (NOAA) Yuri Shprits (MIT) Ilia Roussev (NSF) Scott McIntosh (NCAR / HAO) Vyacheslav Lukin (NSF) Nathan Schwadron (UNH ex-chair) Masha Kuznetsova (GSFC / Community Karel Schrijver (Lockheed Martin) Coordinated Modeling Center) Jim Slavin (U Michigan) Mona Kessel (NASA HQ / Chadi Salem (UC Berkeley) Van Allen Probes) Alexa Halford (GSFC) Dean Pesnell (GSFC / Pontus Brandt (APL) Solar Dynamics Observatory) Tim Bastian (NRAO) David Sibeck (GSFC / Van Allen Probes) Kent Tobiska Adam Szabo (GSFC / Solar Probe Plus) (Space Environment Tech.) Chris St. Cyr (GSFC / Solar Orbiter) LWS Program Ex Officio: Elsayed Talaat & Jeff Morrill (NASA HQ), Shing Fung (GSFC) 2003 Science Definition Team Report: Living with a Star Objectives LWS initiative: goal-oriented research program targeting those aspects of the Sun-Earth system that directly affect life and society. The objectives of LWS will advance research in Sun-Earth system science to new territory, producing knowledge and understanding that society can ultimately utilize. 2003 LWS Science Definition Team Report: TR&T Program The Targeted Research and Technology (TR&T) component of LWS provides the theory, modeling, and data analysis necessary to enable an integrated, system-wide picture of Sun-Earth connection science with societal relevance. Science Definition Team (SDT) … formed
    [Show full text]
  • Sentinelssentinels
    SentinelsSentinels This LWS program element includes the Inner Heliospheric Sentinels (IHS) and the Far Side Sentinel (FSS) missions, each with its own distinct concept. And post o’er land and ocean without rest, They also serve who only stand and wait. On His Blindness Goddard Space Flight Center John Milton SentinelsSentinels StudyStudy ChronologyChronology Date Event Concept 1/13/00 Sentinels Briefing By A. Szabo Far Side Observer, L1 Cluster, NG STEREO 1/20/00 Preformulation Team Meeting Imaging/In-Situ Libration Point Measurements 2/2/00 Preformulation Team Meeting Emphasis On Heliospheric Elements 2/3/00 to 3/31/00 Libration Point Orbit Studies Orbit Trajectory Options 3/31/00 Preformulation Team Meeting Far Side Sentinel/4 Inner Heliospheric Sentinels 4/6/00 Sentinels Workshop 4 Satellite Constellation/Far Side Options 4/7/00 JPL Preliminary FSS Concept 3-Axis Spacecraft/5 Instruments/1 Launch 4/10/00 IMDC IHS Briefing 4 Spinning Satellites/4 Instruments/1 Launch 4/17/00 to 4/20/00 IMDC IHS Study 4 Spinning Satellites/4 Instruments/1 Launch 4/20/00 to 4/27/00 JPL FSS Concept/Cost Update Custom Spacecraft/5 Instruments/1 Launch 4/21/00 to 5/5/00 GSFC Mission Costing Far Side Sentinel/4 Inner Heliospheric Sentinels 5/25/00 FSS Mission Concept Summary Defined In Attached System/Subsystem Charts 5/31/00 Program Operating Plan Costed As Two Separate Missions Goddard Space Flight Center SentinelsSentinels ConceptConcept EvolutionEvolution LWS scientists initially considered a complement of spacecraft for the Sentinels mission that included a spacecraft observing the far side of the Sun, a cluster of satellites at L1, and two next-generation STEREO spacecraft.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Heliophysics Division Template
    NASA Heliophysics Division Update Heliophysics Advisory Committee October 1, 2019 Dr. Nicola J. Fox Director, Heliophysics Division Science Mission Directorate 1 The Dawn of a New Era for Heliophysics Heliophysics Division (HPD), in collaboration with its partners, is poised like never before to -- Explore uncharted territory from pockets of intense radiation near Earth, right to the Sun itself, and past the planets into interstellar space. Strategically combine research from a fleet of carefully-selected missions at key locations to better understand our entire space environment. Understand the interaction between Earth weather and space weather – protecting people and spacecraft. Coordinate with other agencies to fulfill its role for the Nation enabling advances in space weather knowledge and technologies Engage the public with research breakthroughs and citizen science Develop the next generation of heliophysicists 2 Decadal Survey 3 Alignment with Decadal Survey Recommendations NASA FY20 Presidential Budget Request R0.0 Complete the current program Extended operations of current operating missions as recommended by the 2017 Senior Review, planning for the next Senior Review Mar/Apr 2020; 3 recently launched and now in primary operations (GOLD, Parker, SET); and 2 missions currently in development (ICON, Solar Orbiter) R1.0 Implement DRIVE (Diversify, Realize, Implemented DRIVE initiative wedge in FY15; DRIVE initiative is now Integrate, Venture, Educate) part of the Heliophysics R&A baseline R2.0 Accelerate and expand Heliophysics Decadal recommendation of every 2-3 years; Explorer mission AO Explorer program released in 2016 and again in 2019. Notional mission cadence will continue to follow Decadal recommendation going forward. Increased frequency of Missions of Opportunity (MO), including rideshares on IMAP and Tech Demo MO.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy, Astrophysics, and Astrobiology
    ASTRONOMY, ASTROPHYSICS, AND ASTROBIOLOGY JOINT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON SPACE & SUBCOMMITTEE ON RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION July 12, 2016 Serial No. 114–87 Printed for the use of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://science.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 20–916PDF WASHINGTON : 2017 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY HON. LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas, Chair FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., ZOE LOFGREN, California Wisconsin DANIEL LIPINSKI, Illinois DANA ROHRABACHER, California DONNA F. EDWARDS, Maryland RANDY NEUGEBAUER, Texas SUZANNE BONAMICI, Oregon MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas ERIC SWALWELL, California MO BROOKS, Alabama ALAN GRAYSON, Florida RANDY HULTGREN, Illinois AMI BERA, California BILL POSEY, Florida ELIZABETH H. ESTY, Connecticut THOMAS MASSIE, Kentucky MARC A. VEASEY, Texas JIM BRIDENSTINE, Oklahoma KATHERINE M. CLARK, Massachusetts RANDY K. WEBER, Texas DONALD S. BEYER, JR., Virginia JOHN R. MOOLENAAR, Michigan ED PERLMUTTER, Colorado STEPHEN KNIGHT, California PAUL TONKO, New York BRIAN BABIN, Texas MARK TAKANO, California BRUCE WESTERMAN, Arkansas BILL FOSTER, Illinois BARBARA COMSTOCK, Virginia GARY PALMER, Alabama BARRY LOUDERMILK, Georgia RALPH LEE ABRAHAM, Louisiana DRAIN LAHOOD, Illinois WARREN DAVIDSON, Ohio SUBCOMMITTEE ON SPACE HON. BRIAN BABIN, Texas, Chair DANA ROHRABACHER, California DONNA F. EDWARDS, Maryland FRANK D.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1960 Presidential Election in Florida: Did the Space Race and the National Prestige Issue Play an Important Role?
    UNF Digital Commons UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations Student Scholarship 2000 The 1960 rP esidential Election in Florida: Did the Space Race and the National Prestige Issue Play an Important Role? Randy Wade Babish University of North Florida Suggested Citation Babish, Randy Wade, "The 1960 rP esidential Election in Florida: Did the Space Race and the National Prestige Issue Play an Important Role?" (2000). UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 134. https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd/134 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at UNF Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UNF Digital Commons. For more information, please contact Digital Projects. © 2000 All Rights Reserved THE 1960 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN FLORIDA: DID THE SPACE RACE AND THE NATIONAL PRESTIGE ISSUE PLAY AN IMPORTANT ROLE? by Randy Wade Babish A thesis submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES December, 2000 Unpublished work © Randy Wade Babish The thesis of Randy Wade Babish is approved: (Date) Signature Deleted Signature Deleted Signature Deleted Signature Deleted Accepted for the College: Signature Deleted Signature Deleted eanofGfaduate rues ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Although my name appears on the title page and I assume full responsibility for the final product and its content, the quality of this work was greatly enhanced by the guidance of several individuals. First, the members of my thesis committee, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Through the Eyes of Pioneers: Accounts of the Womenâ•Žs
    Wright State University CORE Scholar Master of Humanities Capstone Projects Master of Humanities Program 2015 Through the Eyes of Pioneers: Accounts of the Women’s Suffrage Movement in Dayton, Ohio (1890-1920) Michelle Schweickart Wright State University - Main Campus Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/humanities Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Repository Citation Schweickart, M. (2015). Through the Eyes of Pioneers: Accounts of the Women’s Suffrage Movement in Dayton, Ohio (1890-1920) (Master's thesis). Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master of Humanities Program at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master of Humanities Capstone Projects by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Through the Eyes of Pioneers: Accounts of the Women’s Suffrage Movement in Dayton, Ohio (1890-1920) By: Michelle Schweickart “I believe in woman suffrage because I believe in fundamental democracy. There can be no fundamental democracy where half the population, being of sound mind, are compelled to obey laws in the making of which they have had no voice . But if I must say more, then I would say that women today need, and are asking for the ballot not because they wish to forsake their homes, but because they wish to make their homes better places to live in. Woman needs the ballot to protect her home and her children, now as always her first care . .” - Grace Isabel Colbron, “Why I Believe in Woman Suffrage,” n.d.
    [Show full text]
  • Living with a Star Pre-Formulation Study
    Living With a Star Pre-Formulation Study Volume 2 Mission Concept Descriptions August 1, 2000 G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R AcknowledgementAcknowledgement The Living With a Star (LWS) study management acknowledges with gratitude the significant contributions to this volume made by GSFC engineering team and Integrated Mission Design Center (IMDC) personnel. A special note of thanks also goes to NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory personnel who developed the concept for the Far Side Sentinel mission and provided timely input to the mission study team. G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R OverviewOverview This volume summarizes the results of a 6-month LWS pre-formulation study to develop initial concepts for a set of missions that form the basis for the NASA proposed space weather research network. Pre-formulation begins the process to define a viable and affordable concept for new NASA programs and projects. This step is followed by a more formal formulation phase to ensure that the program or project is ready to proceed into implementation. The policy and process are defined in NPD 7120.4A and NPG 7120.5A. G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R TraceabilityTraceability A concerted effort has been made to maintain traceability of concepts and associated costs throughout the LWS program study. This added rigor will allow intelligent trade-offs to be performed and assessed as the program evolves over the months and years ahead.
    [Show full text]