DOCSLIB.ORG

The Federal Republic of Germany and the First Indochina War (1946-1954)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Federal Republic of Germany and the First Indochina War (1946-1954) The Federal Republic of Germany and the first Indochina War (1946-1954) Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophie des Fachbereichs Geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften der Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Erstgutachter: PD. Dr. Detlef Briesen Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Dirk van Laak vorgelegt von Dao Duc Thuan aus Vietnam November 2012 Table of content CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. Background of the first Indochina War 1 1.2. Germany and France under post-war reconstruction 7 1.3. Purposes of study 10 1.4. Sources 16 1.5. Structure of the research 17 CHAPTER 2 VIETNAM FROM 1945 TO 1954 AND THE IMPACTS 22 OF THE DECOLONIZATION IN INDOCHINA ON FRANCE 2.1. Vietnam from 1945 to 1954 22 2.1.1. Historical background 22 2.1.2. Diplomatic strategy and efforts of Ho Chi Minh 24 2.1.3. France’s return to Indochina and the outbreak of the first 28 Indochina War 2.1.4. From a colonial war to an internationalized war 32 2.1.5. Influence of Dien Bien Phu as a signal of French 37 decolonization in Indochina 2.1.6. The Geneva Conference and its echoes 41 2.2. Impacts of the first Indochina War and decolonization in 44 Indochina on France 2.2.1. Impact on French domestic politics 45 2.2.2. Impact on military status 47 2.2.3. Impact on economics 48 2.2.4. Impact on French colonial and foreign policy 52 CHAPTER 3 GERMANY AND FRANCE AFTER WW II TO THE 55 EARLY 1960s 3.1. Europe from the end of WW II till the early 1960s 56 3.2. Germany after WW II 61 3.2.1. The policies of the Allies towards Germany after 1945 66 3.2.1.1. The U.S. with the “open door” policy 66 i 3.2.1.2. The British policy 68 3.2.1.3. The SU’s policy 70 3.2.1.4. The French policy 71 3.2.2. Germany in the four occupational zones 74 3.2.3. The establishment of the two German states in 1949 80 3.2.4. West Germany in the 1950s 82 3.3. France after WW II 86 3.3.1. Internal issues 86 3.3.2. France’s foreign policy 95 3.3.3. French dilemma in Europe and in Indochina 97 3.3.4. Relations between Germany and France after WW II 105 CHAPTER 4 THE ATTITUDES OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF 111 GERMANY TOWARDS THE FIRST INDOCHINA WAR 4.1. The diplomatic relations between the FRG and Indochina 111 4.2. The attitudes of the FRG towards the first Indochina War 114 4.2.1. West German policy on the first Indochina War 114 4.2.1.1. Background for West Germany’s “Indochinapolitik” 114 4.2.1.2. West German federal government and parliament’s attitudes 118 towards the first Indochina War 4.2.1.3. West German politicians’ attitudes towards the first Indochina 125 War 4.2.2. West German policy on the Germans in the FFL 128 4.3. The attitudes of West German political groups towards 136 the first Indochina War CHAPTER 5 THE WEST GERMAN PUBLIC VIEW TOWARDS THE 144 FIRST INDOCHINA WAR 5.1. West German newspapers and the first Indochina War 145 5.1.1. The attitudes of the world great powers 146 5.1.2. West German government’s attitudes towards the first 151 Indochina War 5.1.3. French dilemma in Indochina 154 ii 5.1.4. The fall of Dien Bien Phu and its impacts 157 5.1.5. West German state and other countries’ attitudes towards 160 EDC and West German rearmament 5.1.6. Germans in the FFL 166 5.2. The first Indochina War in the memoirs of former French 170 legionnaires CHAPTER 6 THE IMPACTS OF DECOLONIZATION IN 178 INDOCHINA AND LESSONS LEARNT FOR THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY 6.1. The impact of decolonization in Indochina on the FRG 179 6.1.1. Impact on political and social life 179 6.1.2. Impact on foreign policy making 182 6.2. The French decolonization in Indochina – lessons learnt 186 for the FRG 6.2.1. German-Franco reconciliation 188 6.2.2. West German integration into Western institutions 193 6.2.2.1. West German economic integration into the ECSC 195 6.2.2.2. West German military integration into NATO 198 6.2.3. West German policy towards Third World countries 204 6.2.3.1. West German development aid to Third World countries 204 6.2.3.2. West German diplomatic policy towards Africa and Vietnam 213 6.2.4. The emergence of the New Left in the FRG 221 CHAPTER 7 CONCLUSION 226 ABBREVIATIONS 242 TABLES AND ILLUSTRATIONS 244 BIBLIOGRAPHY 246 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I owe deep gratitude to so many people for their help with the preparation of this thesis. First of all, I would like to express my most special thanks to my supervisor, PD. Dr. Detlef Briesen, my esteemed teacher and guide, for his basic ideas on the topic, invaluable guidance, numerous suggestions and many helpful comments on my paper. His constant encouragement gave me the inspiration to complete my paper preparation. His brilliance in editing steadily tightened the great length of this thesis. Also, I should like to thank Prof. Dr. Dirk van Laak at the Faculty of History and Cultural Studies, University of Gießen for his useful comments and corrections on my thesis. My thanks go to all of my colleagues at the Faculty of History and Cultural Studies, University of Gießen for their attention and questione as well as their critical views during my presentation at our seminar. Doing scientific work in both German and Vietnamese archives and libraries can be a challenge for any researcher, especially for young and foreign researchers. I have learnt that without their kind help I would not have been able to accomplish my paper. My first archival work would not be completed without the patient guidance of Herr Ulf Rathje, Herr Cornelius Sommer and Herr Sven Schneidereit at the federal archive in Berlin. Also, Herr Hermann Wiesrecker and Herr Günther Rüb at the Press and Information Office of the Federal Government provided me with a supportive service during my newspaper exploration in Berlin. I wish to thank Herr Ulrich Geyer at the Archive of the Federal Foreign Office, who whole-heartedly guided me to a variety of materials related to my topic when I had a chance to explore that archive. Frau Karin Langer and Frau Antonia Wetzler at the German Radio Archive also deserve my sincere thanks for their kindness and assistance. I would like to express my gratitude to the Vietnamese archivists at the National Archive Center III and many others who have received me and provided me with the excellent assistance. iv I am also indebted to all my colleagues and friends from the Faculty of Archive Studies and Office Management, University of Social Sciences and Humanities (Vietnam National University, Hanoi) who have encouraged me throughout my scientific work. I have been fortunate enough to work with Dr. Nguy ễn Th ị Liên H ươ ng, Vice Dean of the Faculty of Archive Studies and Office Management who openly shared with me lots of her study and living experiences in Germany as well as encouragement at various stages. I also take this oppotunity to thank Mr. Nguy ễn Tr ần Ti ến - PhD scholar, PG Department of History, Ravenshaw University, Cuttack, India, for his timely reading and critical comments on my first draft. From the bottom of my heart, I am indebted to many scholars and researchers whose works are cited in my thesis. Of course, any scientific views and misunderstandings with the German language that occur in the thesis are entirely my own. I would like to take this opportunity to frame my words to the Ministry of Education and Training of Vietnam (MoET) and the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) for awarding me handsome scholarships during my period of study in Germany. Last but not least, I am indebted to my family and my friends who have supported me in many ways during the completion of this thesis. Without a doubt, I simply could not have completed my work without their encouragements. v CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1. Background of the first Indochina War The August Revolution (Vietnamese: Cách m ạng Tháng Tám ) is regarded as the greatest revolution in contemporary Vietnamese history. The proclamation of the independence of Vietnam by Ho Chi Minh on 2 September 1945 marked the beginning of the end of colonial rule, under which the French had simultaneously supported the survival of the ruling classes of the old Vietnamese monarchy. However, France did not recognize the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (DRV) and the Vietnamese sovereignty that President Ho Chi Minh and his Vietminh supporters had declared. 1 As a result, fighting soon broke out between the Vietminh and the French troops. For France, of course, the position in Indochina 2 was essential to regain and occupy the status of a great power as France’s prestige was seriously tested during World War II (WW II) and lost by the collaboration of the Vichy government with Nazi Germany from 1940 to 1944. In the first part of WW II, Germany and Japan achieved successes. Consequently, France lost control over its colonial territories; in some cases, opposing French military forces, i.e., Vichy France3 and Free France,4 even fought over the control of them. After the liberation of Paris and France as a whole in 1944, the socio-economic condition was relatively unstable and weak.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • America and Vietnam: the Unending War Author(S): George C. Herring Source: Foreign Affairs, Vol
    America and Vietnam: The Unending War Author(s): George C. Herring Source: Foreign Affairs, Vol. 70, No. 5, America and the Pacific, 1941-1991 (Winter, 1991), pp. 104-119 Published by: Council on Foreign Relations Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20045006 Accessed: 04/05/2009 15:34 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=cfr. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Council on Foreign Relations is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Foreign Affairs. http://www.jstor.org George C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Manhattan Project and Its Legacy
    Transforming the Relationship between Science and Society: The Manhattan Project and Its Legacy Report on the workshop funded by the National Science Foundation held on February 14 and 15, 2013 in Washington, DC Table of Contents Executive Summary iii Introduction 1 The Workshop 2 Two Motifs 4 Core Session Discussions 6 Scientific Responsibility 6 The Culture of Secrecy and the National Security State 9 The Decision to Drop the Bomb 13 Aftermath 15 Next Steps 18 Conclusion 21 Appendix: Participant List and Biographies 22 Copyright © 2013 by the Atomic Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved. No part of this book, either text or illustration, may be reproduced or transmit- ted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, reporting, or by any information storage or retrieval system without written persmission from the publisher. Report prepared by Carla Borden. Design and layout by Alexandra Levy. Executive Summary The story of the Manhattan Project—the effort to develop and build the first atomic bomb—is epic, and it continues to unfold. The decision by the United States to use the bomb against Japan in August 1945 to end World War II is still being mythologized, argued, dissected, and researched. The moral responsibility of scientists, then and now, also has remained a live issue. Secrecy and security practices deemed necessary for the Manhattan Project have spread through the govern- ment, sometimes conflicting with notions of democracy. From the Manhattan Project, the scientific enterprise has grown enormously, to include research into the human genome, for example, and what became the Internet. Nuclear power plants provide needed electricity yet are controversial for many people.
    [Show full text]
  • Surviving Antigone: Anouilh, Adaptation, and the Archive
    SURVIVING ANTIGONE: ANOUILH, ADAPTATION AND THE ARCHIVE Katelyn J. Buis A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2014 Committee: Cynthia Baron, Advisor Jonathan Chambers ii ABSTRACT Dr. Cynthia Baron, Advisor The myth of Antigone has been established as a preeminent one in political and philosophical debate. One incarnation of the myth is of particular interest here. Jean Anouilh’s Antigone opened in Paris, 1944. A political and then philosophical debate immediately arose in response to the show. Anouilh’s Antigone remains a well-known play, yet few people know about its controversial history or the significance of its translation into English immediately after the war. It is this history and adaptation of Anouilh’s contested Antigone that defines my inquiry. I intend to reopen interpretive discourse about this play by exploring its origins, its journey, and the archival limitations and motivations controlling its legacy and reception to this day. By creating a space in which multiple readings of this play can exist, I consider adaptation studies and archival theory and practice in the form of theatre history, with a view to dismantle some of the misconceptions this play has experienced for over sixty years. This is an investigation into the survival of Anouilh’s Antigone since its premiere in 1944. I begin with a brief overview of the original performance of Jean Anouilh’s Antigone and the significant political controversy it caused. The second chapter centers on the changing reception of Anouilh’s Antigone beginning with the liberation of Paris to its premiere on the Broadway stage the following year.
    [Show full text]
  • The Partition of Korea After World War II This Page Intentionally Left Blank the PARTITION of KOREA AFTER WORLD WAR II
    The Partition of Korea after World War II This page intentionally left blank THE PARTITION OF KOREA AFTER WORLD WAR II A GLOBAL HISTORY Jongsoo Lee THE PARTITION OFKOREA AFTER WORLD WAR II © Jongsoo Lee, 2006. Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2006 978-1-4039-6982-8 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews. First published in 2006 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN™ 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010 and Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England RG21 6XS Companies and representatives throughout the world. PALGRAVE MACMILLAN is the global academic imprint of the Palgrave Macmillan division of St. Martin’s Press, LLC and of Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. Macmillan® is a registered trademark in the United States, United Kingdom and other countries. Palgrave is a registered trademark in the European Union and other countries. ISBN 978-1-349-53150-9 ISBN 978-1-4039-8301-5 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/9781403983015 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Lee, Jongsoo. The partition of Korea after world war II : a global history / Jongsoo Lee. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Korea—History—Partition, 1945– 2. World War, 1939–1945— Diplomatic history—Soviet Union. 3. World War, 1939–1945— Diplomatic history—United States. 4. Korea—History—Allied occupation, 1945–1948. I. Title. DS917.43.L44 2006 951.904Ј1—dc22 2005054895 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Design by Newgen Imaging Systems (P) Ltd., Chennai, India.
    [Show full text]
  • 75Th Anniversary Debate on 4 June 2019
    D-Day and the Battle of Normandy: 75th Anniversary Debate on 4 June 2019 Summary This year will mark the 75th anniversary of D-Day: the landings of Allied forces on the Normandy coast during the Second World War.1 On 6 June 1944, the Allies launched a combined naval, air and land attack on Nazi-occupied France. Codenamed Operation ‘Overlord’, the landings on the beaches of Normandy marked the start of a “long and costly campaign” to liberate north-west Europe from German occupation.2 On the morning of D-Day, airborne forces parachuted into drop zones across northern France and ground troops landed across five assault beaches. Naval vessels escorted and landed ground troops, carried out bombardments on German coastal defences and provided artillery support for the invading troops. By the end of the day, the Allies had established a foothold along the coast and began their advance into France. By the end of August 1944, the “Germans were in full retreat out of France”.3 To mark the 75th anniversary, the Ministry of Defence in collaboration with the Royal British Legion and Portsmouth City Council have planned a series of events to take place in Portsmouth and Normandy in June 2019. This will include a specially-chartered ship, which will carry 300 D-Day veterans. On 4 June 2019, the House of Lords is scheduled to debate a motion moved by the Deputy Leader of the House of Lords, Earl Howe, to take note of the 75th anniversary of D-Day. Preparations for Invasion The defeat of Germany was acknowledged as the western Allies’ principal war aim
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Law
    The State of Law The State of Law Comparative Perspectives on the Rule of Law in Germany and Vietnam Ulrich von Alemann/Detlef Briesen/ Lai Quoc Khanh (eds.) Gefördert und gedruckt mit Unterstützung der Gerda Henkel Stiftung, der Anton- Betz-Stiftung der Rheinischen Post und der Gesellschaft von Freunden und Förderern der Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf e.V. (GFFU). Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek. Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.dnb.de abrufbar. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. © düsseldorf university press, Düsseldorf 2017 http://www.dupress.de Satz und Layout: Duc-Viet Publikationen Umschlaggestaltung: Marvin P. Klähn Lektorat, Redaktion: Detlef Briesen Druck: KN Digital Printforce GmbH, Ferdinand-Jühlke-Straße 7, 99095 Erfurt. Der Fließtext ist gesetzt in Garamond 3 FV ISBN: 978-3-95758-053-5 Table of Contents Ulrich von Alemann/Detlef Briesen/Lai Quoc Khanh Introduction ......................................................................................... 9 I. Traditions Nguyen Thi Hoi A Brief History of the Idea of the State of Law and Its Basic Indicators ............................................................................. 17 Pham Duc Anh Thoughts and Policies on Governing the People under the Ly-Tran and the Early Le
    [Show full text]
  • Phần I: Tóm Tắt Ngữ Pháp Tiếng Anh 7
    PHẦN I: TÓM TẮT NGỮ PHÁP TIẾNG ANH 7 1. PRESENT SIMPLE TENSE (Thì hiện tại đơn) Thì hiện tại đơn được dùng để diễn đạt chân lý, sự thật hiển nhiên, tình huống cố định lâu dài ở hiện tại, thói quen hay hành động xảy ra thường xuyên ở hiện tại. • Affirmative form S + V (bare inf.)/V(e)s * Thêm es vào các động từ tận cùng là o, s, sh, ch, x, z • Negative form S + do/does + not + V (bare inf.) • Interrogative form Do/Does + S + V (bare inf.)…? ➢Thì hiện tại đơn thường được dùng với các trạng từ hoặc các cụm trạng từ chỉ tần suất như: always, usually, often, sometimes, never, every day, once a week… 2. PRESENT PROGRESSIVE TENSE (Thì hiện tại tiếp diễn) Thì hiện tại tiếp diễn được dùng để diễn đạt hành động đang diễn ra ngay lúc nói, hành động đang diễn ra ở hiện tại (nhưng không nhất thiết phải ngay lúc nói) và hành động có tính tạm thời. • Affirmative form S + am/ is/ are + V-ing… • Negative form S + am/ is/ are + not + V-ing… • Interrogative form Am/ Is/ Are + S + V-ing…? • Wh-question What/ Where/… + am/ is/ are + S + Ving…? ➢Thì hiện tại tiếp diễn thường được dùng với các từ hoặc các cụm từ chỉ thời gian như: now, right now, at present, at the/ this moment… Lưu ý: Không dùng thì hiện tại tiếp diễn với các động từ chỉ giác quan, cảm xúc, nhận thức và sự sở hữu: see, hear, smell, feel, like, love, hate, dislike, want, know, think, seem, understand, have, vv.
    [Show full text]
  • Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Political violence and its cultural constructions : representations & narrations in times of war de Silva, P.L. Publication date 2000 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): de Silva, P. L. (2000). Political violence and its cultural constructions : representations & narrations in times of war. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:30 Sep 2021 CHAPTERR FIVE CULTURE,, VIOLENCE AND POWER ©© Purnaka L. de Silva Culturee lends significance to human experience by selecting from and organizing it. It refers broadlyy to the forms through which people make sense of their lives, rather than more narrowlyy to the opera or art museums. It does not inhabit a setaside domain, as does, for example,, that of politics or economics.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet-American Relations and the Origins of Containment 1941-1946: the Force of Tradition
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1988 Soviet-American relations and the origins of containment 1941-1946: The force of tradition Anita Louise Coryell The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Coryell, Anita Louise, "Soviet-American relations and the origins of containment 1941-1946: The force of tradition" (1988). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 5179. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/5179 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COPYRIGHT ACT OF 1976 Th i s is an unpublished m a n u s c r ip t in w h ic h c o p y r ig h t s u b s i s t s . Any f u r t h e r r e p r in t in g of i t s c o n t e n t s m u st be APPROVED BY THE AUTHOR. Ma n s f i e l d L ib r a r y U n i v e r s i t y of Mo n ta n a Da t e : , 1 , SOVIET-AMERICAN RELATIONS AND THE ORIGINS OF CONTAINMENT, 1941-1946: THE FORCE OF TRADITION By Anita Louise Coryell B.A., Rutgers, The State University, 1974 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1988 Approved by: Chairman, Board of Examiners Dean, Graduate School lusrt/J Date UMI Number: EP40643 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Molotov and the Moscow Conference, October 1943* Introduction
    1 Derek Watson Derek Watson, "Molotov et la Centre for Russian and East European Studies Conférence de Moscou, Octobre The University of Birmingham 1943." Communisme, no. 74/75, 72-99. Original text in English. Molotov and the Moscow Conference, October 1943* Introduction Molotov served as head of NarkomIndel from May 1939 until 1949, and then again in the early Khrushchev era. He is often remembered as being involved in some of the most infamous episodes in the foreign policy of the USSR: the Nazi-Soviet pact, the dismemberment of Poland, the take-over of the Baltic states and the creation of the Soviet satellite empire in eastern Europe after 1945. His style was equally notorious: he was rude and abrupt, and the net over the smallest matter came to represent the inflexible and stubborn nature of Soviet negotiating techniques, at the post-war conferences of foreign ministers. He seemed to be insensitive to and lack understanding of western opinion, which unlike his predecessor Litvinov, and subordinates, like Maiskii, he was not prepared to make any effort to represent to his Kremlin colleagues.1 There was, however, a much more positive side to Molotov as commissar for Foreign Affairs. If the Triple Alliance negotiations of 1939 with Britain and France failed, their success might have prevented the Second World War; during his visit to Britain and the USA in 1942 the Grand Alliance which was responsible for the defeat of Hitler war was forged; and the Moscow foreign ministers conference of October 1943, which is generally taken as marking the peak of Molotov’s diplomatic career, was crucial in laying the foundations for the post-war world.
    [Show full text]
  • Algerian War of Independence - France
    Joint Crisis: Algerian War of Independence - France JHUMUNC 2017 1 Joint Crisis: Algerian War of Independence - France Topic A: The Grand Ensemble and the Algerian War Topic B: Domestic Challenges and the Challenge to French Identity Overview committee and its legislative board, the The French-Algerian War occurred Algerian cabinet. between 1954-1962, spanning the Fourth and Fifth Republics of France. The war was Parliamentary Procedure not limited to conflict between French For this committee, we will follow colonial authorities and Algerian standard parliamentary procedure. We will nationalists, but also involved civil divide on remain in moderated caucus, unless a the Algerian front between populations of motion for an unmoderated caucus is different cultural backgrounds, religions, motioned and approved. Standard voting and ideologies toward the future of the state. procedure will be observed, and any This committee opens in 1955 and serves as differences regarding procedures will be the managerial body of the French subject to the decision of the chair and dais government, the French Cabinet, with Rene staff. Gustav Coty as the director, who will be represented by the chair. Delegates are responsible for evaluating domestic and Delegate Biographies foreign challenges simultaneously. Part of Maurice Bougrès-Maunoury the committee will revolve around growing Maunoury played an important role resistance in the French colony of Algeria, as the leader in the French Resistance, a while another segment will address the movement to interfere with the Nazi internal challenges faced by the French occupation of France. Following the end of government, which affect the future World War II, Borges served as minister for structure of the government and all of several different seats including defense, France.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline for World War II — Japan
    Unit 5: Crisis and Change Lesson F: The Failure of Democracy and Return of War Student Resource: Timeline for World War II — Japan Timeline for World War II — Japan Pre-1920: • 1853: American Commodore Matthew Perry arrived in Tokyo harbor and forced the Japanese to allow trade with U.S. merchants with threat of military action. • 1858: Western nations forced Japan to sign the Unequal Treaties. These articles established export and import tariffs and the concept of "extraterritoriality" (i.e., Japan held no jurisdiction over foreign criminals in its land. Their trials were to be conducted by foreign judges under their own nation's laws). Japan had no power to change these terms. • 1868: Japan, in an effort to modernize and prevent future Western dominance, ousted the Tokugawa Shogunate and adopted a new Meiji Emperor. The next few decades saw rapid and successful industrialization during the Meiji Restoration. • 1899: With newly gained power from recent industrialization, Japan successfully renegotiated aspects of the Unequal Treaties. • 1899–1901: The Boxer Rebellion led China to a humiliating defeat by the Eight-Nation Alliance of Western powers including the United States and Japan, ceding more territory, and dealing one of the final blows to the struggling Qing Dynasty. • 1904–1905: The Russo-Japanese War began with a surprise attack and ended by an eventual Japanese victory over Imperial Russia. The Japanese took control of Korea. • 1914: During World War I, Japan and other Allies seized German colonial possessions. • 1919: Japan, as a member of the victorious Allies during World War I, gained a mandate over various Pacific islands previously part of the German colonial empire.
    [Show full text]