Survey of State-Listed Reptiles in the Florida Keys

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Survey of State-Listed Reptiles in the Florida Keys Survey of State-listed Reptiles in the Florida Keys FINAL REPORT Jonathan D. Mays and Kevin M. Enge October 31, 2016 Reptile and Amphibian Subsection Fish and Wildlife Research Institute Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission 1105 SW Williston Rd. Gainesville, FL 32601 FINAL REPORT Reptile and Amphibian Subsection Wildlife Research Section Fish and Wildlife Research Institute Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Project Title: Survey of State-listed Reptiles in the Florida Keys Project Number: 9241-295-1313 Project Duration: July 2015 to October 2016 Principal Investigators: Jonathan Mays and Kevin Enge, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, FWRI, Wildlife Research Section, Reptile and Amphibian Subsection, 1105 S.W. Williston Road, Gainesville, FL 32601 Cooperators: Adam Emerick (USFWS), Pierson Hill (FWC-FWRI), Kenneth Krysko (FLMNH), Ricardo Zambrano and Carol Rizkalla (FWC- HSC), Prepared By: Jonathan Mays and Kevin Enge Date Submitted: 31 October 2016 Survey of State-listed Reptiles in the Florida Keys 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 6 Environment ................................................................................................................................ 6 Target Reptile Taxa ..................................................................................................................... 7 Objectives ................................................................................................................................... 8 METHODS .................................................................................................................................... 8 RESULTS .................................................................................................................................... 10 DISCUSSION .............................................................................................................................. 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .......................................................................................................... 14 LITERATURE CITED .............................................................................................................. 15 FIGURES AND TABLES .......................................................................................................... 17 “Report Reptiles in the Florida Keys” website ......................................................................... 17 Outreach flyer #1 ...................................................................................................................... 18 Outreach flyer #2 ...................................................................................................................... 19 Lower Keys Coverboard Sites .................................................................................................. 20 Lower Keys Driving Surveys .................................................................................................... 21 Numbering scheme for striped mud turtles ............................................................................... 22 All reptile and amphibian observations, by survey method ...................................................... 23 Striped mud turtle survivalbility, detectability, population growth rate, and population size .. 24 Striped mud turtle location map and monthly observations histogram .................................... 25 Florida Keys mole skink location map and monthly observations histogram .......................... 26 Keys ringneck snake location map and monthly observations histogram ................................ 27 Red rat snake location map and monthly observations histogram ............................................ 28 Florida brown snake location map and monthly observations histogram ................................. 29 Survey of State-listed Reptiles in the Florida Keys 3 Rim rock crowned snake location map and monthly observations histogram .......................... 30 Eastern ribbon snake location map and monthly observations histogram ................................ 31 APPENDIX I – New island records for reptiles in the Florida Keys ..................................... 32 APPENDIX II – Reptile and amphibian species list of state park surveys ........................... 37 PHOTOS ...................................................................................................................................... 38 Terrestrial habitats .................................................................................................................... 38 Aquatic habitats ........................................................................................................................ 39 Coverboard sites ........................................................................................................................ 40 Field methods ............................................................................................................................ 41 Survey of State-listed Reptiles in the Florida Keys 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY One turtle, 1 lizard, and 5 snake taxa in the Florida Keys are currently state listed, and 5 of these taxa have been proposed for federal listing. Many locality records are old, and subsequent habitat alteration and hurricanes have affected populations and their distribution. We conducted a 1-year study to collect updated occurrence records, determine effective survey methods, assess the status of historical localities, and collect genetic samples for future taxonomic studies. Public outreach efforts, including an FWC website developed to solicit sightings, produced 75 reports of target taxa (10 mud turtles, 8 mole skinks, 10 ringneck snakes, 35 red rat snakes, 1 brown snake, and 11 ribbon snake records). Monthly visits for 1 year produced 164 records of target taxa. Seventy-three records of 3 target taxa came from road (12 striped mud turtles, 23 red rat snakes, and 7 ribbon snakes) or pedestrian (8 striped mud turtles, 11 red rat snakes, and 12 ribbon snakes) surveys, whereas 192 coverboards produced only 8 mole skinks and 2 ringneck snakes. Targeted surveys for the striped mud turtle (turtle trapping) and Florida Keys mole skink (raking) produced 62 and 19 individuals, respectively. We were unsuccessful at detecting the rim rock crowned snake and at developing effective methodologies to use in future surveys of the Keys ringneck snake, brown snake, and rim rock crowned snake. Sufficient data could be collected on the striped mud turtle and red rat snake to determine their population status, although our observations suggest both are doing well, despite experiencing road mortality. Future work targeting the Florida Keys mole skink or ribbon snake has potential, but detection of both species is highly weather dependent. A biologist at National Key Deer Refuge will be incorporating our methodologies to conduct a more extensive coverboard study that will provide more data on the effectiveness of this survey technique. Survey of State-listed Reptiles in the Florida Keys 5 INTRODUCTION Environment The Florida Keys are a chain of approximately 1,700 small, narrow limestone islands that stretch in a gentle arc southwesterly for ca. 220 km from the southeastern tip of peninsular Florida. Based upon geology, the Upper Keys extend about 175 km from Soldier Key to Newfound Harbor Channel on the eastern side of Big Pine Key, and the Lower Keys extend about 50 km from Big Pine Key to Key West (Hoffmeister and Multer 1968). However, we consider the Lower Keys, which we targeted for surveys, to extend from Little Duck Key to Key West. The 11 km between Knight’s Key (Upper Keys) and Little Duck Key is spanned by Seven Mile Bridge and probably represents a dispersal barrier for many terrestrial species. The unconnected Marquesas Keys are an undeveloped group of mangrove-covered islands located ca. 30 km west of Key West. The Dry Tortugas are a small group of 7 islands (4 islands disappeared during hurricanes) located ca. 100 km west of Key West. The Upper and Lower Keys were formed by 2 different processes that created different geological formations, hydrology, topography, and land forms (Hoffmeister and Multer 1968). The surface rock of the Upper Keys is composed of Key Largo limestone that was formed by ancient coral reefs when sea level was estimated to be 6−8 m higher than today and all of southern Florida was inundated (Perkins 1977). Key Largo limestone extends from Miami Beach south throughout the entire Florida Keys, and west to the Dry Tortugas, where it is found ca. 9 m below sea level (Hoffmeister and Multer 1968). The surface rock of most of the Lower Keys is made up of Miami oolitic limestone (oolitic facies) that overlays the underground foundation of Key Largo limestone at a low angle in a southerly direction (Hoffmeister and Multer 1968). A contact zone exists on southeastern Big Pine Key, and the dividing point between the two limestone formations is found at the Newfound Harbor Channel (Hoffmeister and Multer 1968). Miami oolite is an ancient, underwater, east-west shoal of unstable oolite that grew mainly by a chemical process as calcium carbonate crystals formed and precipitated out of warming salt water (Hoffmeister and Multer 1968). The biogenic origin of Miami oolite can be observed in the northwest to southeast orientation and shape of the islands, and the lower, more uniform
Recommended publications
  • USGS 7.5-Minute Image Map for Crawl Key, Florida
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CRAWL KEY QUADRANGLE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FLORIDA-MONROE CO. 7.5-MINUTE SERIES 81°00' 57'30" 55' 80°52'30" 5 000m 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 24°45' 01 E 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 690 000 FEET 11 12 24°45' Grassy Key 27 000m 37 N 5 27 BANANA BLVD 37 Florida Crawl Key Bay Long Point Key 35 150 000 FEET «¬5 T65S R33E ¤£1 Little Crawl Key Valhalla 5 34 MARATHON 2736 Fat Deer 2736 Fat Deer Key Key Deer Key T66S R33ER M D LU CO P C3O 2735 2735 O C E O R N O ATLANTIC M OCEAN East 2734 Turtle Shoal 2734 2733 2733 Imagery................................................NAIP, January 2010 Roads..............................................©2006-2010 Tele Atlas Names...............................................................GNIS, 2010 42'30" 42'30" Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2010 Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2010 Hawk Channel 2732 2732 West Turtle Shoal FLORIDA Coffins Patch 2731 2731 2730 2730 2729 2729 CO E ATLANTIC RO ON OCEAN M 40' 40' 2727 2727 2726 2726 2725 2725 110 000 FEET 2724 2724000mN 24°37'30" 24°37'30" 501 660 000 FEET 502 5 5 5 5 507 5 5 5 511 512000mE 81°00' 03 04 57'30" 05 06 08 55' 09 10 80°52'30" ^ Produced by the United States Geological Survey SCALE 1:24 000 ROAD CLASSIFICATION 7 North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83) 3 FLORIDA Expressway Local Connector 3 World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84).
    [Show full text]
  • Central Keys Area Reasonable Assurance Documentation
    Central Keys Area Reasonable Assurance Documentation F K R A D FKRAD Program December 2008 Prepared for FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Watershed Management Bureau Tallahassee, Florida Prepared by Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. URS Corporation Southern 1715 N. Westshore Boulevard 7650 Courtney Campbell Causeway Tampa, Florida 33607 Tampa, Florida 33607 Florida Department of Environmental Protection REASONABLE ASSURANCE DOCUMENTATION CENTRAL KEYS AREA F K R A D December 2008 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Central Keys Area Reasonable Assurance Document was developed under the direction of Mr. Fred Calder and Mr. Pat Fricano of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) with the assistance of the following stakeholder’s representatives: Ms. Suzy Thomas, Director of Community Services and Mr. Mike Hatfield, P.E., Weiler Engineering, City of Marathon Mr. Clyde Burnett, Mayor/City Administrator, City of Key Colony Beach; Mr. Philip “Skip” Haring, Assistant to Mayor City of Layton; Ms. Elizabeth Wood, P.E., Wastewater Section Chief, Monroe County; Mr. Jaime Barrera, FDOT District VI; and Mr. Fred Hand, Bureau of Facilities, FDEP. The authors gratefully acknowledge the comments review comments of the Stakeholders technical representatives and Mr. Gus Rios, Manager of FDEP’s Marathon Service Office. The document was developed a collaborative effort led by Mr. Scott McClelland of CDM Inc. and Mr. Stephen Lienhart of URS Corporation. S:\FDEP\Central RAD\FKRAD Central Cover and Prelim.doc i Florida Department of Environmental Protection REASONABLE ASSURANCE DOCUMENTATION CENTRAL KEYS AREA F K R A D December 2008 Central Keys Area Stakeholders Documents As a measure of reasonable assurance and support of this document, the stakeholders in the Central Keys Area (City of Marathon, City of Key Colony Beach, City of Layton, Monroe County, FDOT and the Florida State Parks Service) have provided signed documents confirming that the management activities identified in this document indeed reflect the commitments of the stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Coastal Element Data Inventory and Analysis
    City of Marathon Comprehensive Plan CONSERVATION AND COASTAL ELEMENT DATA INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS This section addresses the data inventory requirements supportive of the development of goals, objectives, policies, and implementation programs for the Conservation and Coastal Element. (§9J-5.012(2) and §9J-5.013(1), F.A.C.) Environmental Setting of Marathon and the Florida Keys The low-lying limestone islands comprising the Florida Keys extend 233 miles southwestward in a gradual arc from Biscayne bay at the southeastern tip of the Florida peninsula to the Dry Tortugas in the Gulf of Mexico. Southeast of the Keys is the Florida Reef Tract, a continuous band of coral reefs bordering the Straits of Florida, lying five to seven miles offshore and extending 220 miles from Solider Key to the Dry Tortugas. To the west and northwest is Florida Bay, a shallow embayment of the Gulf of Mexico with an extensive network of carbonate mud shoals and seagrass beds (Florida DER, 1987d). At the top of the Upper Keys, Card Sound and Barnes Sound are shallow embayments which tie into Biscayne Bay. Climate Marathon and the Florida Keys experience a subtropical savanna-type climate characterized by warm humid summers and mild dry winters. The mean annual sunshine is 3,300 hours, ten percent more than the Florida Peninsula to the north. The average annual temperature in the Florida Keys ranges from a summer high of 89 degrees in July to a winter low of 63 degrees in February. Temperatures below freezing have not been recorded in the Keys, primarily due to the meliorative effects of the warm marine waters in the area and the presence of the warm Gulf Stream along the coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Collier Miami-Dade Palm Beach Hendry Broward Glades St
    Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission F L O R ID A 'S T U R N P IK E er iv R ee m Lakewood Park m !( si is O K L D INDRIO ROAD INDRIO RD D H I N COUNTY BCHS Y X I L A I E O W L H H O W G Y R I D H UCIE BLVD ST L / S FT PRCE ILT SRA N [h G Fort Pierce Inlet E 4 F N [h I 8 F AVE "Q" [h [h A K A V R PELICAN YACHT CLUB D E . FORT PIERCE CITY MARINA [h NGE AVE . OKEECHOBEE RA D O KISSIMMEE RIVER PUA NE 224 ST / CR 68 D R !( A D Fort Pierce E RD. OS O H PIC R V R T I L A N N A M T E W S H N T A E 3 O 9 K C A R-6 A 8 O / 1 N K 0 N C 6 W C W R 6 - HICKORY HAMMOCK WMA - K O R S 1 R L S 6 R N A E 0 E Lake T B P U Y H D A K D R is R /NW 160TH E si 68 ST. O m R H C A me MIDWAY RD. e D Ri Jernigans Pond Palm Lake FMA ver HUTCHINSON ISL . O VE S A t C . T I IA EASY S N E N L I u D A N.E. 120 ST G c I N R i A I e D South N U R V R S R iv I 9 I V 8 FLOR e V ESTA DR r E ST.
    [Show full text]
  • The Monroe County Comprehensive Plan Addresses the Data Inventory Requirements of 9J‐5.0005 (2) of the Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.)
    Monroe County Comprehensive Plan Update HOUSING Table of Contents Item Page 7.0 HOUSING ELEMENT.................................................................................................................................... 1 7.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1 7.1.1 Policy Framework........................................................................................................... 1 7.1.2 Residential Land Use Characteristics...................................................................11 7.2 Existing Housing Stock Characteristics..............................................................................12 7.2.1 Type of Housing ............................................................................................................12 7.2.2 Occupancy and Tenure ..............................................................................................14 7.2.3 Vacancy Status ...............................................................................................................16 7.2.4 Age of Housing ..............................................................................................................18 7.2.5 Price/Rent Characteristics and Affordability ..................................................19 7.2.6 Cost to Income Ratios ................................................................................................29 7.2.7 Structural Conditions of Housing Stock .............................................................31
    [Show full text]
  • Currently the Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems
    CRITICALLY ERODED BEACHES IN FLORIDA Updated, June 2009 BUREAU OF BEACHES AND COASTAL SYSTEMS DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION STATE OF FLORIDA Foreword This report provides an inventory of Florida's erosion problem areas fronting on the Atlantic Ocean, Straits of Florida, Gulf of Mexico, and the roughly seventy coastal barrier tidal inlets. The erosion problem areas are classified as either critical or noncritical and county maps and tables are provided to depict the areas designated critically and noncritically eroded. This report is periodically updated to include additions and deletions. A county index is provided on page 13, which includes the date of the last revision. All information is provided for planning purposes only and the user is cautioned to obtain the most recent erosion areas listing available. This report is also available on the following web site: http://www.dep.state.fl.us/beaches/uublications/tech-rut.htm APPROVED BY Michael R. Barnett, P.E., Bureau Chief Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems June, 2009 Introduction In 1986, pursuant to Sections 161.101 and 161.161, Florida Statutes, the Department of Natural Resources, Division of Beaches and Shores (now the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems) was charged with the responsibility to identify those beaches of the state which are critically eroding and to develop and maintain a comprehensive long-term management plan for their restoration. In 1989, a first list of erosion areas was developed based upon an abbreviated definition of critical erosion. That list included 217.6 miles of critical erosion and another 114.8 miles of noncritical erosion statewide.
    [Show full text]
  • East Coast.Xlsx
    Bagster® collection service is available in the following areas. This list is alphabetical by state and then by city name. Please note that some zip codes within a city may not be serviced due to local franchise restrictions. Bagster collection service area subject to change at any time. If your area is not listed or you have questions visit www.thebagster.com or call 1-877-789-BAGS (2247). State City Zip CT A A R P Pharmacy 06167 CT Abington 06230 CT Accr A Data 06087 CT Advertising Distr Co 06537 CT Advertising Distr Co 06538 CT Aetna Insurance 06160 CT Aetna Life 06156 CT Allingtown 06516 CT Allstate 06153 CT Amston 06231 CT Andover 06232 CT Ansonia 06401 CT Ansonia 06418 CT Ashford 06250 CT Ashford 06278 CT Avon 06001 CT Bakersville 06057 CT Ballouville 06233 CT Baltic 06330 CT Baltic 06351 CT Bank Of America 06150 CT Bank Of America 06151 CT Bank Of America 06180 CT Bantam 06750 CT Bantam 06759 CT Barkhamsted 06063 CT Barry Square 06114 CT Beacon Falls 06403 CT Belle Haven 06830 CT Berlin 06037 CT Bethany 06524 CT Bethel 06801 CT Bethlehem Village 06751 CT Bishop's Corner 06117 CT Bishop's Corner 06137 CT Bissell 06074 CT Bloomfield 06002 CT Bloomingdales By Mail Ltd 06411 CT Blue Hills 06002 CT Blue Hills 06112 CT Bolton 06043 CT Borough 06340 CT Botsford 06404 CT Bozrah 06334 CT Bradley International Airpor 06096 CT Branford 06405 CT Bridgeport 06601 CT Bridgeport 06602 CT Bridgeport 06604 CT Bridgeport 06605 CT Bridgeport 06606 CT Bridgeport 06607 CT Bridgeport 06608 CT Bridgeport 06610 CT Bridgeport 06611 CT Bridgeport 06612
    [Show full text]
  • THE KEYS AREA PRECIPITATION PROJECT (KAPP) DB Wolff1,2, J
    P3A.11 ON THE CHARACTERISTICS OF PRECIPITATION IN THE FLORIDA KEYS: THE KEYS AREA PRECIPITATION PROJECT (KAPP) D. B. Wolff1,2, J. Gerlach3, D. Marks1,4, A. Tokay1,5, B. Fisher1,2, D. Silberstein1,4, and J. Wang1,2 1NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 912, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771 2Science Systems and Applications, Inc., 5900 Princess Garden Parkway, Lanham, Maryland 20706 3NASA Wallops Flight Facility, Wallops Island, Virginia 23337 4George Mason University, Center for Earth Observing and Space Research, Fairfax, Virginia 22030 5Joint Center for Earth Systems Technology, UMBC, Baltimore, Maryland 21250 1. Introduction The Keys Area Precipitation Project (KAPP) was West National Weather Service Office and several local sponsored by NASA’s Tropical Rainfall Measuring residents. The TSVO provided a network of rain gauges Mission (TRMM) Satellite Validation Office (TSVO) and and disdrometers and collected radar data from the ran from August 1 through October 9, 2002. The National Weather Service (NWS) WSR-88D radar principal goals of the project were: 1) to study the located on Boca Chica Key. The OSB provided 24 hour feasibility of using the Keys area as a primary ground observations from the NASA Polarimetric (NPOL) radar. validation site for TRMM and possibly other precipitation Figure 1 provides an illustration of the gauge, missions; and 2) to complement the data set collected in disdrometer and radar network deployed for the the summer of 2001 during the Keys Area Microphysics experiment. Project (KAMP), which was part of the Fourth Convection and Moisture Experiment (CAMEX-IV). 2. Data Collection While CAMEX-IV-KAMP involved researchers from multiple agencies and universities located over the 2.1 Gauge data entire Florida peninsula, KAPP was designed more A total of 24 gauge sites were established.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2019 Monthly Bacteriological Reports
    FKAA BACTERIA MONTHLY REPORT PWSID# 4134357 Month: March 2019 H.R.S. LAB # E56717 & E55757 MMO‐MUG/ Cl2 pH RETEST MMO‐MUG/ 100ML DATE 100ML Cl2 pH SERVICE AREA # 1 S.I. LAB Date Sampled: 3/4/2019 101 Hyatt Windward Point‐3675 S. Roosevelt Blvd A 3.1 9.21 103 Conch Train Maintenance‐1802 Staples Ave. A 2.1 9.17 105 Casa Marina Resort ‐ 1500 Reynolds Ave A 3.0 9.18 107 Community Pool‐300 Catherine St. A 3.4 9.20 109 FKAA Key West Pumping Station‐301 Southard St. A 3.4 9.18 111 Hyatt Resort‐601 Front St. A 3.3 9.21 113 Strunk Lumberyard‐1111 Eaton St. (rear) A 3.0 9.10 115 Casa Gato Apts.‐1209 Virginia St. A 3.0 9.20 117 Circle K/Shell‐1890 N. Roosevelt Blvd. A 3.1 9.21 119 Pizza Hut‐3023 N. Roosevelt Blvd. A 3.1 9.18 153 Convalescent Center‐1400 Kennedy Dr A 3.0 9.18 123 Hertz/Welcome Center‐3840 N. Roosevelt Blvd. A 3.0 9.15 125 Las Salinas Condo‐3930 S. Roosevelt Blvd. A 3.2 9.21 127 Advanced Discount Auto Parts‐1835 Flagler Ave. A 2.7 9.20 129 807 Washington St. (#101) A 3.0 9.18 131 Dewey House‐504 South St. A 3.3 9.22 133 Harbor Place Condo‐107 Front St. A 3.2 9.25 135 Old Town Trolley Barn‐126 Simonton St. A 3.2 9.19 137 U.S. Navy Peary Court Housing‐White/Southard St.
    [Show full text]
  • Monroe County Stormwater Management Master Plan
    Monroe County Monroe County Stormwater Management Master Plan Prepared for Monroe County by Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. August 2001 file:///F|/GSG/PDF Files/Stormwater/SMMPCover.htm [12/31/2001 3:10:29 PM] Monroe County Stormwater Management Master Plan Acknowledgements Monroe County Commissioners Dixie Spehar (District 1) George Neugent, Mayor (District 2) Charles "Sonny" McCoy (District 3) Nora Williams, Mayor Pro Tem (District 4) Murray Nelson (District 5) Monroe County Staff Tim McGarry, Director, Growth Management Division George Garrett, Director, Marine Resources Department Dave Koppel, Director, Engineering Department Stormwater Technical Advisory Committee Richard Alleman, Planning Department, South Florida WMD Paul Linton, Planning Department, South Florida WMD Murray Miller, Planning Department, South Florida WMD Dave Fernandez, Director of Utilities, City of Key West Roland Flowers, City of Key West Richard Harvey, South Florida Office U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Ann Lazar, Department of Community Affairs Erik Orsak, Environmental Contaminants, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Gus Rios, Dept. of Environmental Protection Debbie Peterson, Planning Department, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Teresa Tinker, Office of Planning and Budgeting, Executive Office of the Governor Eric Livingston, Bureau Chief, Watershed Mgmt, Dept. of Environmental Protection AB i C:\Documents and Settings\mcclellandsi\My Documents\Projects\SIM Projects\Monroe County SMMP\Volume 1 Data & Objectives Report\Task I Report\Acknowledgements.doc Monroe County Stormwater Management Master Plan Stormwater Technical Advisory Committee (continued) Charles Baldwin, Islamorada, Village of Islands Greg Tindle, Islamorada, Village of Islands Zulie Williams, Islamorada, Village of Islands Ricardo Salazar, Department of Transportation Cathy Owen, Dept. of Transportation Bill Botten, Mayor, Key Colony Beach Carlos de Rojas, Regulation Department, South Florida WMD Tony Waterhouse, Regulation Department, South Florida WMD Robert Brock, Everglades National Park, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Bac Rpt-January 2021.Xlsx
    FKAA BACTERIA MONTHLY REPORT Month: January 2021 PWSID# 4134357 H.R.S. LAB # E56717 & E55757 MMO‐MUG/ Cl2 pH RETEST MMO‐MUG/ 100ML DATE 100ML Cl2 pH SERVICE AREA # 1 S.I. LAB Date Sampled: 1/6/2021 101 Hyatt Windward Point‐3675 S. Roosevelt Blvd A 3.0 9.10 102 Sheraton Suites‐2001 S. Roosevelt Blvd A 2.9 9.05 104 1310 Johnson St A 2.8 9.08 105 Casa Marina Resort ‐ 1500 Reynolds Ave A 2.6 9.03 106 Santa Maria Joint Venture‐1401 Simonton St. A 2.9 9.06 107 Community Pool‐300 Catherine St. A 3.2 9.13 109 FKAA Key West Pumping Station‐301 Southard St. A 3.4 9.16 110 Guy Harvy's‐515 Greene St. A 3.2 9.06 111 Hyatt Resort‐601 Front St. A 2.7 9.06 112 Key West Seaport‐631 Greene St. A 3.0 9.06 113 Strunk Lumberyard‐1111 Eaton St. (rear) A 2.8 9.11 114 US Navy Trumbo Pt. OMI Fleming Key Bridge A 2.7 9.15 115 Casa Gato Apts.‐1209 Virginia St. A 2.6 9.23 116 827 Eisenhower Dr. A 2.9 9.18 117 Circle K/Shell‐1890 N. Roosevelt Blvd. A 2.9 9.22 118 Fairfield Inn‐2400 N. Roosevelt Blvd. A 3.0 9.20 119 Pizza Hut‐3023 N. Roosevelt Blvd. A 3.1 9.21 120 US Navy Housing Elem. School Sigsbee‐Felton Rd. A 2.9 9.20 122 Customer Residence‐3704 Flagler Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • ART in PUBLIC PLACES Request for Proposals (RFP)
    ART IN PUBLIC PLACES Request for Proposals (RFP) MONROE COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY, MARATHON BRANCH & ADULT EDUCATION CENTER 3490 Overseas Hwy. Marathon, Monroe County, Florida 33050 RFP accessed through Demandstar by calling (800)711-1712 www.demandstar.com or www.monroecounty-fl.gov Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) Mayor Sylvia Murphy, District 5 Mayor Pro Tem Danny Kolhage, District 1 SUBMISSION DEADLINE Michelle Coldiron, District 2 November 14, 2019, by 3:00 p.m. EST Heather Carruthers, District 3 David Rice, District 4 THE ART IN PUBLIC PLACES PROGRAM Monroe County Art in Public Places (AIPP) is a County appointed committee responsible for the commission and purchase of public art by contemporary artists in any media. The Monroe County Art in Public Places Ordinance No. 022-2001 mandates that one percent (1%) of new County building construction costing a minimum of $500,000.00 and renovations costing a minimum of $100,000.00 be set aside to fund this program. A committee comprised of five (5) voting members appointed by the County Commission, plus two (2) non-voting members appointed by the County Administrator, pre-qualifies, reviews and recommends projects to the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC). The Monroe County Art in Public Places program is administered by the Florida Keys Council of the Arts (FKCA). BUDGET The maximum art budget amount, inclusive of all costs for artists, including installation, is Fifty- six Thousand and 00/100 ($56,000.00) Dollars, for any and all commissions for the two (2) interior projects. The $56,000 is allocated as follows: Fifty Thousand and 00/100 ($50,000.00) Dollars for suspended artwork in the atrium, with the remaining Six Thousand and 00/100 ($6,000.00) Dollars to be used for terrazzo floor design.
    [Show full text]