Napolitano Back at Fox, Standing by Claim That Got Him Suspended

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Napolitano Back at Fox, Standing by Claim That Got Him Suspended Napolitano Back at Fox, Standing by Claim That Got Him Suspended Rhonda Adams, New York Entrepreneur For a week or so the media world was ablaze with a series of high-profile bumps and bruises among popular faces on TV news. Andrew Napolitano was dropped from Fox after he insisted on statements his own network said had no basis in fact. And Tomi Lahren was suspended from The Blaze for her comments about abortion. But the futures for these two popular personalities have diverged. Where, after the suspension, Lahren was reportedly fired, Napolitano was back on Fox after a week. And it looks like his seven-day vacation hasn’t pushed Andrew off message. Napolitano immediately doubled down on his assertions that President Obama worked with British intelligence officials to spy on then-candidate Donald Trump. The British intelligence agency in question called the assertions “utterly ridiculous,” and even Fox took its popular pundit to task. That was then. A week later, during his return interview, Fox News host Bill Hemmer didn’t take the opportunity to correct Napolitano to his face, simply letting his comments stand. This leads some people to wonder openly why Napolitano was benched then if the network doesn’t seem to want to challenge his statements now. That question, it seems, won’t be answered anytime soon. And that might be a problem, from a PR perspective. (Photo Source: Twitter) Fox News remains the go-to media source for the GOP and its voters. In today’s divided political environment, that’s not surprising … nor is it abnormal. The left has its favorites too. The issue, though, is the growing divide in the GOP itself. Ever since the 2010 midterm elections, labeled the Tea Party Revolution, the Republicans have nurtured two distinct groups in their party. The more “right” group hasn’t had any problems defying fellow Republicans, which they proved again during the recent Obamacare repeal debate, and subsequent failure. The Napolitano v. Fox divide is both a microcosm and a lever in this divide. The fault line is growing, and, if the network that feeds messaging to these groups within the group can’t get its narrative straight, it could cause a further divide. Some media watchers say this is inevitable. That it started in the first televised GOP primary debate when Megyn Kelly went toe-to-toe with Trump. That exchange revealed a growing split among Fox viewers … and now Kelly is gone, taking her fans with her to another network. Subsequently, Fox pushed some anchors, like Bret Baier and Brit Hume, and it elevated pundits like Tucker Carlson to higher profile assignments. The clearly intended divide was to keep both sides of their audience happy: with more mainstream folks watching the news anchors, and those closer to Tea Party politics tuning into Hannity, O’Reilly, and Carlson. And that’s tended to work … but that delineation invites extremism, moments where more conspiracy narratives slip into regular TV programming. That happened with Napolitano, and Fox immediately reacted. But now he’s back … and so is the backlash. Should be interesting to see how this plays out. About the Author: Rhonda Adams is a New York based entrepreneur. Some of Rhonda Adams’ previous writings can be found here. .
Recommended publications
  • 'Duncanville' Is A
    Visit Our Showroom To Find The Perfect Lift Bed For You! February 14 - 20, 2020 2 x 2" ad 300 N Beaton St | Corsicana | 903-874-82852 x 2" ad M-F 9am-5:30pm | Sat 9am-4pm milesfurniturecompany.com FREE DELIVERY IN LOCAL AREA WA-00114341 The animated, Amy Poehler- T M O T H U Q Z A T T A C K P Your Key produced 2 x 3" ad P U B E N C Y V E L L V R N E comedy R S Q Y H A G S X F I V W K P To Buying Z T Y M R T D U I V B E C A N and Selling! “Duncanville” C A T H U N W R T T A U N O F premieres 2 x 3.5" ad S F Y E T S E V U M J R C S N Sunday on Fox. G A C L L H K I Y C L O F K U B W K E C D R V M V K P Y M Q S A E N B K U A E U R E U C V R A E L M V C L Z B S Q R G K W B R U L I T T L E I V A O T L E J A V S O P E A G L I V D K C L I H H D X K Y K E L E H B H M C A T H E R I N E M R I V A H K J X S C F V G R E N C “War of the Worlds” on Epix Bargain Box (Words in parentheses not in puzzle) Bill (Ward) (Gabriel) Byrne Aliens Place your classified Classified Merchandise Specials Solution on page 13 Helen (Brown) (Elizabeth) McGovern (Savage) Attack ad in the Waxahachie Daily Light, Merchandise High-End 2 x 3" ad Catherine (Durand) (Léa) Drucker Europe Midlothian Mirror and Ellis Mustafa (Mokrani) (Adel) Bencherif (Fight for) Survival County Trading1 Post! x 4" ad Deal Merchandise Word Search Sarah (Gresham) (Natasha) Little (H.G.) Wells Call (972) 937-3310 Run a single item Run a single item priced at $50-$300 priced at $301-$600 for only $7.50 per week for only $15 per week 6 lines runs in The Waxahachie Daily Light, ‘Duncanville’ is a new Midlothian Mirror and Ellis County Trading2 x 3.5" Post ad and online at waxahachietx.com All specials are pre-paid.
    [Show full text]
  • Fox News Personalities Past and Present
    Fox News Personalities Past And Present Candy-striped Clancy charts very riotously while Maxwell remains jingling and advisory. Monopteral Quint regurgitate or corral some rulership dishonestly, however unmaimed Bernardo misfields mistakenly or physics. Tabu Robert tappings his snooker quantifies starchily. Fox News veterans face a hurdle all the job market Having. While i did revamp mandatory metallica was valedictorian of his live coverage of these are no guarantees of optimist youth home and present top actors, az where steve hartman. Fox News Anchor Kelly Wright On that He's Suing The. Personalities FOX 4 News Dallas-Fort Worth. Also named individual Fox personalities Maria Bartiromo Lou Dobbs. As a past. All Personalities FOX 5 DC. Lawsuit Accuses Former Fox News Anchor Ed Henry of Rape. Fox News anchor Kelly Wright speaks to the media as he joins other shoe and former Fox employees at any press conference organized by his. How exactly does Sean Hannity make? The First Amendment Cases and Theory. Tv personalities to that had never accused of internships during weekend cameraman at some female anchors, there are our. Are raising two. My life in new york native raised in the plain dealer reporter in cadillac, impact your new york city that journalism from comics kingdom as i sent shockwaves through! Growing up past ocean city and present in english literature. Fox News TV Series 197 cast incredible crew credits including actors actresses. Personalities FOX 26 Houston. The past and present top dollar for comment on this must have made independent of. Trish Regan bio age height education salary net worth husband.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Talk Radio and Its Impact on Politics and Public Policy
    Mount Rushmore: The Rise of Talk Radio and Its Impact on Politics and Public Policy Brian Asher Rosenwald Wynnewood, PA Master of Arts, University of Virginia, 2009 Bachelor of Arts, University of Pennsylvania, 2006 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Virginia August, 2015 !1 © Copyright 2015 by Brian Asher Rosenwald All Rights Reserved August 2015 !2 Acknowledgements I am deeply indebted to the many people without whom this project would not have been possible. First, a huge thank you to the more than two hundred and twenty five people from the radio and political worlds who graciously took time from their busy schedules to answer my questions. Some of them put up with repeated follow ups and nagging emails as I tried to develop an understanding of the business and its political implications. They allowed me to keep most things on the record, and provided me with an understanding that simply would not have been possible without their participation. When I began this project, I never imagined that I would interview anywhere near this many people, but now, almost five years later, I cannot imagine the project without the information gleaned from these invaluable interviews. I have been fortunate enough to receive fellowships from the Fox Leadership Program at the University of Pennsylvania and the Corcoran Department of History at the University of Virginia, which made it far easier to complete this dissertation. I am grateful to be a part of the Fox family, both because of the great work that the program does, but also because of the terrific people who work at Fox.
    [Show full text]
  • Asian American Political Elites' Failed Assimilationist Strategy*
    Empowerment, Discrimination, and the Fagade of Leadership: Asian American Political Elites' Failed Assimilationist Strategy* Kevin Shawn Hsut I. INTRODUCTION On November 8, 2006, the day after the midterm Congressional elections, the 2008 presidential campaign season officially began. The media began to tell and will continue to retell predetermined stories regarding the role of Black Americans as core to the Democratic Party,' the rising political power of Latino voters, 2 or the importance of certain demographics of White voters.3 The story that likely will not appear on the * Winner: 2007 Asian American Law Journal Student Writing Competition t J.D., 2007, Georgetown University Law Center; B.A., 2004, University of California, San Diego. This article began in the Critical Race Perspectives Seminar of the venerable Professor Charles R. Lawrence, I1l, to whom I owe many thanks for sage advice and encouragement. Much thanks and respect to my colleagues and friends Moneek Bhatia and Navneet Grewal for their insights. Special thanks to Lauren Fouda for her continuous encouragement and support. 1. See, e.g., Diane Cardwell & Jonathan P. Hicks, On West Coast, A Lesson Planfor Ferrer Bid, N.Y. TIMES, May 20, 2005, at Al ("The incumbent in Los Angeles, James K. Hahn, was viewed as a lackluster leader who had turned off some key constituencies, particularly black voters."); Political Grapevine, Fox Special Report with Brit Hume (Fox News Network television broadcast Apr. 8, 2005) (Tim Roemer (D), Fmr. Indiana Representative: "Church-going African Americans ...are starting to peel off to some degree the Democratic Party. That's something I think the Democratic Party needs to be greatly concerned about."); Frankie Edozien, Ferrer's Flub a Big Time Bloc-Buster, N.Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Embedded Reporters: What Are Americans Getting?
    Embedded Reporters: What Are Americans Getting? For More Information Contact: Tom Rosenstiel, Director, Project for Excellence in Journalism Amy Mitchell, Associate Director Matt Carlson, Wally Dean, Dante Chinni, Atiba Pertilla, Research Nancy Anderson, Tom Avila, Staff Embedded Reporters: What Are Americans Getting? Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has suggested we are getting only “slices” of the war. Other observers have likened the media coverage to seeing the battlefield through “a soda straw.” The battle for Iraq is war as we’ve never it seen before. It is the first full-scale American military engagement in the age of the Internet, multiple cable channels and a mixed media culture that has stretched the definition of journalism. The most noted characteristic of the media coverage so far, however, is the new system of “embedding” some 600 journalists with American and British troops. What are Americans getting on television from this “embedded” reporting? How close to the action are the “embeds” getting? Who are they talking to? What are they talking about? To provide some framework for the discussion, the Project for Excellence in Journalism conducted a content analysis of the embedded reports on television during three of the first six days of the war. The Project is affiliated with Columbia University and funded by the Pew Charitable Trusts. The embedded coverage, the research found, is largely anecdotal. It’s both exciting and dull, combat focused, and mostly live and unedited. Much of it lacks context but it is usually rich in detail. It has all the virtues and vices of reporting only what you can see.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critique of President Clinton's Council on Sustainable Development
    Journal of Natural Resources & Environmental Law Volume 14 Issue 2 Journal of Natural Resources & Article 5 Environmental Law, Volume 14, Issue 2 January 1999 Sustainable America in the Twenty-First Century: A Critique of President Clinton's Council on Sustainable Development Kristina M. Tridico Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/jnrel Part of the Environmental Law Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Tridico, Kristina M. (1999) "Sustainable America in the Twenty-First Century: A Critique of President Clinton's Council on Sustainable Development," Journal of Natural Resources & Environmental Law: Vol. 14 : Iss. 2 , Article 5. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/jnrel/vol14/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Natural Resources & Environmental Law by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SUSTAINABLE AMERICA IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY: A CRITIQUE OF PRESIDENT CLINTON'S COUNCIL ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Kristina M. Tridico* I. INTRODUCTION By the end of 1961 Rachel Carson's Silent Spring inspired an environmental consciousness that was the catalyst for reorienting Americans to the way decisions are made.' By the end of 1987, Our Common Future, the report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (better known as the Brundtland Report) created a dialogue of sustainable development.2 With the close of 1999, will the now reports of the President's Council on3 Sustainable Development build a framework for a new century? President Clinton realized that Americans embrace the Rachel Carson vision when he proclaimed in his first inaugural address, "Yes, you, my fellow Americans have forced the spring." 4 Perhaps with this vision and the Brundtland Report's "Call to Action"5 as a catalyst, J.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Watches the Watchmen? the Conflict Between National Security and Freedom of the Press
    WHO WATCHES THE WATCHMEN WATCHES WHO WHO WATCHES THE WATCHMEN WATCHES WHO I see powerful echoes of what I personally experienced as Director of NSA and CIA. I only wish I had access to this fully developed intellectual framework and the courses of action it suggests while still in government. —General Michael V. Hayden (retired) Former Director of the CIA Director of the NSA e problem of secrecy is double edged and places key institutions and values of our democracy into collision. On the one hand, our country operates under a broad consensus that secrecy is antithetical to democratic rule and can encourage a variety of political deformations. But the obvious pitfalls are not the end of the story. A long list of abuses notwithstanding, secrecy, like openness, remains an essential prerequisite of self-governance. Ross’s study is a welcome and timely addition to the small body of literature examining this important subject. —Gabriel Schoenfeld Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute Author of Necessary Secrets: National Security, the Media, and the Rule of Law (W.W. Norton, May 2010). ? ? The topic of unauthorized disclosures continues to receive significant attention at the highest levels of government. In his book, Mr. Ross does an excellent job identifying the categories of harm to the intelligence community associated NI PRESS ROSS GARY with these disclosures. A detailed framework for addressing the issue is also proposed. This book is a must read for those concerned about the implications of unauthorized disclosures to U.S. national security. —William A. Parquette Foreign Denial and Deception Committee National Intelligence Council Gary Ross has pulled together in this splendid book all the raw material needed to spark a fresh discussion between the government and the media on how to function under our unique system of government in this ever-evolving information-rich environment.
    [Show full text]
  • “Bill Hemmer Reports” to Debut on January 20Th NEW YORK
    “Bill Hemmer Reports” to Debut on January 20th NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- FOX News Channel (FNC) has named Bill Hemmer to helm the 3pm/ET hour, announced Jay Wallace, president and executive editor of FOX News Media. In this role, he will lead all breaking news coverage as well as take over the hard news hour with the January 20th debut of Bill Hemmer Reports. In conjunction, Hemmer will depart FNC’s morning news program America’s Newsroom (9AM-12PM/ET) with a rotating journalist joining Sandra Smith until a permanent co-anchor is announced. In making the announcement, Wallace said, “Bill is an incredible newsman and his ability to cut to the heart of the story while humanizing major events has made him a standout talent in news. As we start gearing up for the 2020 election, we are thrilled to have him lead our news division through what will sure to be an eventful year.” Hemmer added, “As a journalist, l am extremely grateful for this opportunity. 2020 will undoubtedly be a year of great significance. Leading our breaking news division with a signature hour has enormous value to me, personally, and to our audience. We’ve got a fantastic team here and I am excited to get to work.” Emanating from the FOX News Deck, Bill Hemmer Reports will utilize state-of-the-art newsgathering technology along with the network’s leading correspondents to provide a comprehensive look at developing stories around the world. Hemmer will also lead a dedicated team of producers and information specialists who are prepared to interrupt regular programming with breaking news at a moment’s notice.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawsuit to Set the Record Straight, to Vindicate Its Rights, and to Recover Damages for the Devastating Economic Harm Done to Its Business
    IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION ) VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., and ) DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS ) CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Case No. v. ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED FOX NEWS NETWORK, LLC, ) ) Defendant. ) ) COMPLAINT 1. Fox, one of the most powerful media companies in the United States, gave life to a manufactured storyline about election fraud that cast a then-little- known voting machine company called Dominion as the villain. After the November 3, 2020 Presidential Election, viewers began fleeing Fox in favor of media outlets endorsing the lie that massive fraud caused President Trump to lose the election. They saw Fox as insufficiently supportive of President Trump, including because Fox was the first network to declare that President Trump lost Arizona. So Fox set out to lure viewers back—including President Trump himself— by intentionally and falsely blaming Dominion for President Trump’s loss by rigging the election. 1 2. Fox endorsed, repeated, and broadcast a series of verifiably false yet devastating lies about Dominion. These outlandish, defamatory, and far-fetched fictions included Fox falsely claiming that: (1) Dominion committed election fraud by rigging the 2020 Presidential Election; (2) Dominion’s software and algorithms manipulated vote counts in the 2020 Presidential Election; (3) Dominion is owned by a company founded in Venezuela to rig elections for the dictator Hugo Chávez; and (4) Dominion paid kickbacks to government officials who used its machines in the 2020 Presidential Election. 3. Fox recklessly disregarded the truth. Indeed, Fox knew these statements about Dominion were lies. Specifically, Fox knew the vote tallies from Dominion machines could easily be confirmed by independent audits and hand recounts of paper ballots, as has been done repeatedly since the election.
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks by Chris Wallace Accepting the Media Institute's 2018 Freedom of Speech Award October 24, 2018
    Remarks by Chris Wallace Accepting The Media Institute’s 2018 Freedom of Speech Award October 24, 2018 First of all – I want to thank The Media Institute for this award and the important work you do. Your efforts these last 40 years to support free speech and a free press have never been more important. I want to thank my colleague Brit Hume for your kind introduction. Brit – you read it just the way I wrote it. We all know how evenings like this tend to go these days. The person getting the award tells you what a threat President Trump poses to a free press – how dangerous his comments are about – “fake news is the enemy of the American people.” And if the person getting the award is anywhere near the center – he also warns his colleagues to stay in their lane – and not get drawn into arguments with the President – not to become advocates. I know – because I have given speeches like that. I will get there in a few minutes. But first – I want to talk about the good news – how fortunate those of us who work in this business are – in what we do for a living. I want to remind you why we got into journalism in the first place – the excitement of learning something important – and then getting the chance to share it with everyone else. My first job – if you can call it that – was in 1964 – at the Republican Convention in San Francisco. I was Walter Cronkite’s “go-fer” – go for coffee, go for pencils.
    [Show full text]
  • National News Channel FOX News Headlines 24/7 to Debut Exclusively on Siriusxm on October 5Th
    NEWS RELEASE National News Channel FOX News Headlines 24/7 to Debut Exclusively on SiriusXM on October 5th 9/30/2015 "FOX News Headlines 24/7" will provide SiriusXM listeners with around-the-clock original reporting on national news and real-time headlines from the worlds of business, politics, entertainment, sports, social media and more FOX News anchors Shepard Smith and Bill Hemmer to kick-off launch weeks NEW YORK, Sept. 30, 2015 /PRNewswire/ -- Today SiriusXM and FOX News announced that FOX News Headlines 24/7 will launch on October 5th. Broadcast live from FOX News headquarters in midtown Manhattan, the new channel will provide SiriusXM subscribers with real-time headlines on breaking news, national stories, politics, business, entertainment, sports, social media trends, and more. SiriusXM listeners can tune to channel 115 to get all the news they need for their day ahead – 24/7/365. Whether they're in their car, at work, or on-the-go, SiriusXM listeners will now have constant access to live around- the-clock news, as it happens, in 15 minute cycles. This innovative, first of its kind national news endeavor will be staffed by a committed team of FOX News journalists and contributors who will utilize the network's vast resources across the FOX News platforms to report on what listeners need to know at home and around the globe. Overseen by FOX News Senior Vice President of News Jay Wallace, FOX News Headlines 24/7 will feature constantly updated segments on major news events, business, the latest sports scores and entertainment stories, as well as reports on what topics, personalities and memes are currently trending on major social media platforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Is the Mainstream Media Fair and Balanced? Fred Barnes Executive Editor, the Weekly Standard • • • • • • FRED BARNES Is Executive Editor of the Weekly Standard
    The national speech digest of Hillsdale College ImprimisAugust 2006 • Volume 35, Number 8 OVER 1,250,000 READERS MONTHLY Is the Mainstream Media Fair and Balanced? Fred Barnes Executive Editor, The Weekly Standard • • • • • • FRED BARNES is executive editor of The Weekly Standard. From 1985 to 1995, he served as senior editor and White House correspondent for The New Republic. He covered the Supreme Court and the White House for the Washington Star before moving on to the Baltimore Sun in 1979. He served as the national political correspondent for the Sun and wrote the Presswatch media column for the American Spectator. He is host, along with Mort Kondracke, of the Beltway Boys on FOX News, where he also appears regularly on Special Report with Brit Hume. Mr. Barnes graduated from the University of Virginia and was a Neiman Fellow at Harvard University. The following is adapted from a speech delivered in Palm Beach, Florida, on February 22, 2006, at a Hillsdale College National Leadership Seminar on “The News Media in the Twenty-First Century.” et me begin by defining three terms that are thrown around in debates about the media today. The first is objectivity, which means reporting the news with none of your own political views L or instincts slanting the story one way or another. Perfect objectivity is pretty hard for anyone to attain, but it can be approximated. Then there’s fairness. Fairness concedes that there may be some slant in a news story, but requires that a reporter will be honest and not misleading with regard to those with whom he disagrees.
    [Show full text]