DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix B Flora Survey Effort and Results

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

APPENDIX B FLORA SURVEY EFFORT AND RESULTS October 2016 Prepared by Anderson Environment and Planning The Flora Survey Effort (FLSE) for the Biobanking Assessment Report has been guided by the following: The predict threatened flora species from within the Biobanking Credit Calculator; The Threatened Species Survey and Assessment Guidelines for developments and activities (working draft), NSW Department of Environment and Conservation (2004); The NSW Threatened Species Profile Database; and Previous flora survey results from the site. The Biobanking Calculator identified the following species as requiring survey for the proposed development: Melaleuca biconvexa (Biconvex Paperbark); Tetratheca juncea (Black-eyed Susan); Melaleuca groveana (Groves Paperbark); Cryptostylis hunteriana (Leafless Tongue Orchid); Corybas dowlingii (Red Helmet Orchid); Diuris praecox (Rough Double Tail); Grevillea parviflora (Small-flower Grevillea); Persicaria elatior (Tall Knotweed); Cyanchum elegans (White-flowered Wax Plant); Eucalyptus parramattensis subsp. parramattensis population, Wyong and Lake Macquarie local government areas. Following targeted and seasonal survey for the above species only Melaleuca biconvexa was recorded adjacent to the development site and all individuals specimens will be retained following development. Prepared by Anderson Environment and Planning Contents 1.1 Project Background ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Site Survey Rationale ............................................................................................................................. 5 2.0 Field Survey ............................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Previous Assessments ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Current Assessment ............................................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Survey Dates, Times and Activities .................................................................................................. 8 3.0 Results .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 4.0 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................11 5.0 References ................................................................................................................................................12 Tables Table B1 – Previous Survey Undertaken ..................................................................................... 6 Table B2 – AEP Field Survey Periods ................................................................................................ 8 Figures Figure B1 – Flora Survey Effort ....................................................................................................... 7 Figure B2 – Threatened Flora Records ......................................................................................10 Appendices Appendix B1 – Flora Species List..................................................................................................14 Prepared by Anderson Environment and Planning 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Project Background The development site, adjacent proposed development sites as well as adjacent conservation zoned lands have been the subject of numerous flora and fauna assessment reports between the periods of 2003 to 2010. The following reports were used to inform and have been summarised in the 2010 report by Travers Bushfire & Ecology Ecological Constraints and Analysis, Bundeena Road, Glenning Valley; Ambrose Ecological Services Pty Ltd (2007) Fauna survey and assessment - Lot 2 DP 1100181. Anne Clements & Associates (2006) Ecological assessment - Lot 2 DP 1100181. Anne Clements & Associates (2006) Flora Assessment - Lot 2 DP 1100181. Biolink Ecological Consultants (2008) Koala Survey (SEPP 44 Assessment) - Lot 2 DP 1100181. Conacher Travers (2003) Flora and Fauna Assessment (of the Study Area being Lot 2 DP 1100181). Conacher Travers (2003) Flora and Fauna Assessment of Lot 50 DP 755263 Berkeley Road Fountaindale. Conacher Travers (2003) Habitat tree survey (of the Study Area being Lot 2 DP 1100181). Conacher Travers (2006) Flora and Fauna Assessment - Proposed Road Upgrade Berkeley Road, Berkeley Vale. Travers bushfire & ecology (2008) Flora and Fauna Assessment of Lot 50 DP 755263 Berkeley Road Fountaindale. Travers bushfire & ecology (2008) Habitat tree survey - Lot 2 DP 1100181. Travers bushfire & ecology (2009) Bushfire Protection Assessment - Lot 2 DP 1100181. Travers environmental consultants (2008) Ecological Assessment of Lot 50 DP 755263 & Incorporation of a Conservation Plan at 70 Berkeley Road, Fountaindale. The following reports were used to inform and have been summarised in the 2016 Anderson Environment and Planning Report Ecological Assessment Report for Proposed Residential Subdivision of Lot 2 DP1100181, Berkeley Road, Glenning Valley: Prepared by Anderson Environment and Planning Anne Clements and Associates (2014). Potential impact of the proposed lot layout on identified threatened flora on the 38ha site in Glenning Valley. EcoLogical Australia (2011). Glenning Valley Improve or Maintain Assessment – Indicative Biocertification Calculations. Travers Bushfire & Ecology (2013). Response to Council Conditions for a Gateway Determination Berkeley Road, Bundeena Road and Bottlebrush Drive, Glenning Valley. Travers Bushfire & Ecology (2010). Ecological Constraints and Analysis, Bundeena Road, Glenning Valley. At the request of the Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) additional fieldwork has been undertaken to provide more contemporary data for the development site. 1.2 Site Survey Rationale The FLSE for the Biobanking Assessment was guided by the following: Previous threatened species records for the development site and adjacent lands; The predict threatened species from within the Biobanking Credit Calculator; and The Threatened Species Survey and Assessment Guidelines for developments and activities (working draft), NSW Department of Environment and Conservation (2004). From the above the following threatened flora species required seasonal survey. The remaining threatened species were able to be surveyed at any time of year: Tetratheca juncea (July to December); Cryptostylis hunteriana (November to February); Corybas dowlingii (June to August); Diuris praecox (July to August); Persicaria elatior (December to May); To adequately provide contemporary survey data for the above species two seasonal surveys were undertaken in February and August. ; Prepared by Anderson Environment and Planning 2.0 Field Survey 2.1 Previous Assessments The following is a summary of the field survey undertaken on the site prior to the current assessment. Table B1 – Previous Survey Undertaken Species Recommended Survey Date(s) Period Tetratheca juncea July to December 30/07/03, 18/09/03, 10/12/03 Cryptostylis hunteriana November to February 10/12/03 Melaleuca biconvexa All year 10/03/09, 12/03/09, 27/05/10, 21/06/10, 22/06/10 Prostanthera askania September to December 10/03/09, 12/03/09, 27/05/10 Diuris praecox July to August 30/07/03, 17/08/10, 18/08/10 Previous threatened fauna survey identified Melaleuca biconvexa on land adjacent to the proposed development site. 2.2 Current Assessment 2.2.1 Survey Methodology Survey methodology comprised parallel walking transects with higher density transects in more favourable habitat/site attributes. The survey effort is shown in Figure B1 – Flora Survey Effort. 2.2.1.1 February Survey Target species for the February Survey was Cryptostylis hunteriana and Persicaria elatior. Other species that were able to be surveyed for during this period included Melaleuca biconvexa, Melaleuca groveana, Grevillea parviflora, Cyanchum elegans and Eucalyptus parramattensis subsp. parramattensis. 2.2.1.1 August Survey Target species for the February Survey was Tetratheca juncea, Corybas dowlingii and Diuris praecox. Other species that were able to be surveyed for during this period included Melaleuca biconvexa, Melaleuca groveana, Grevillea parviflora, Cyanchum elegans and Eucalyptus parramattensis subsp. parramattensis. Prepared by Anderson Environment and Planning 2.3 Survey Dates, Times and Activities Dates and times for surveys conducted recently by AEP are provided below in Table B2 – AEP Field Survey Periods, with Table B1 – Previous Survey Undertaken above demonstrating past survey effort. Table B2 – AEP Field Survey Periods Date Time Field Activity 13/10/15 10:00 am – 11:30 am Initial site inspection with client 20/10/15 10:00 am – 3:00 pm Vegetation map ground-truthing, targeted flora searches, Melaleuca biconvexa counts, Fauna incidentals 21/10/15 6:30 pm – 10:00 pm Stag watch, spotlighting and call playback 22/10/15 10:30 am – 12:00 pm Anabat deployment, White-bellied Sea Eagle tree inspection 27/10/15 6:00 pm – 9:15 pm Spotlighting, call playback and Anabat collection 30/11/15 11:20 am – 12:45 pm Sea Eagle tree inspections, Vegetation checks, General observations 01/02/16 12:00 pm – 1:00 pm Deploy of fauna survey equipment (disturbed open grassland), fauna survey,
Recommended publications
  • The Native Vegetation of the Nattai and Bargo Reserves

    The Native Vegetation of the Nattai and Bargo Reserves

    The Native Vegetation of the Nattai and Bargo Reserves Project funded under the Central Directorate Parks and Wildlife Division Biodiversity Data Priorities Program Conservation Assessment and Data Unit Conservation Programs and Planning Branch, Metropolitan Environmental Protection and Regulation Division Department of Environment and Conservation ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CADU (Central) Manager Special thanks to: Julie Ravallion Nattai NP Area staff for providing general assistance as well as their knowledge of the CADU (Central) Bioregional Data Group area, especially: Raf Pedroza and Adrian Coordinator Johnstone. Daniel Connolly Citation CADU (Central) Flora Project Officer DEC (2004) The Native Vegetation of the Nattai Nathan Kearnes and Bargo Reserves. Unpublished Report. Department of Environment and Conservation, CADU (Central) GIS, Data Management and Hurstville. Database Coordinator This report was funded by the Central Peter Ewin Directorate Parks and Wildlife Division, Biodiversity Survey Priorities Program. Logistics and Survey Planning All photographs are held by DEC. To obtain a Nathan Kearnes copy please contact the Bioregional Data Group Coordinator, DEC Hurstville Field Surveyors David Thomas Cover Photos Teresa James Nathan Kearnes Feature Photo (Daniel Connolly) Daniel Connolly White-striped Freetail-bat (Michael Todd), Rock Peter Ewin Plate-Heath Mallee (DEC) Black Crevice-skink (David O’Connor) Aerial Photo Interpretation Tall Moist Blue Gum Forest (DEC) Ian Roberts (Nattai and Bargo, this report; Rainforest (DEC) Woronora, 2003; Western Sydney, 1999) Short-beaked Echidna (D. O’Connor) Bob Wilson (Warragamba, 2003) Grey Gum (Daniel Connolly) Pintech (Pty Ltd) Red-crowned Toadlet (Dave Hunter) Data Analysis ISBN 07313 6851 7 Nathan Kearnes Daniel Connolly Report Writing and Map Production Nathan Kearnes Daniel Connolly EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report describes the distribution and composition of the native vegetation within and immediately surrounding Nattai National Park, Nattai State Conservation Area and Bargo State Conservation Area.
  • Goulburn Brochure

    Goulburn Brochure

    Species Soil Type Frost Species Soil Type Frost Species Soil Type Frost Acacia boormanni Well Drained Dry Very Frost Hardy Banksia spinulosa Well Drained Moist Frost Hardy Eucalyptus aquatica Waterlogged/Poorly Drained Very Frost Hardy Well Drained Moist Well Drained Dry Well Drained Moist Shrub Shrub Small Tree Acacia buxifolia Well Drained Dry Frost Hardy Baumea articulata Waterlogged/Poorly Drained Frost Hardy Eucalyptus bridgesiana Well Drained Moist Very Frost Hardy Shrub Grass or sedge Tree Grass/sedge Acacia dealbata Well Drained Dry Very Frost Hardy Baumea rubiginosa Waterlogged/Poorly Drained Frost Hardy Eucalyptus cypellocarpa Well Drained Moist Frost Hardy Well Drained Moist Small Tree Grass or sedge Tree Grass/sedge Acacia decurrens Well Drained Dry Frost Hardy Brachychiton populneus Well Drained Dry Frost Hardy Eucalyptus dealbata Well Drained Dry Frost Hardy Well Drained Moist Well Drained Moist Well Drained Moist Small Tree Tree Tree Acacia fimbriata Well Drained Dry Very Frost Hardy Bursaria spinosa Well Drained Dry Very Frost Hardy Eucalyptus dives Well Drained Dry Frost Hardy Well Drained Moist Well Drained Moist Well Drained Moist Small Tree/Shrub Shrub Small Tree Acacia floribunda Well Drained Moist Very Frost Hardy Callistemon citrinus Well Drained Dry Frost Hardy Eucalyptus elata Well Drained Moist Frost Hardy Well Drained Moist Small Tree/Shrub Shrub Waterlogged/Poorly Drained Tree Acacia howittii Well Drained Moist Frost Hardy Callistemon linearis Well Drained Moist Frost Hardy Eucalyptus fastigata Well Drained
  • Jervis Bay Territory Page 1 of 50 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region (Blank), Jervis Bay Territory

    Jervis Bay Territory Page 1 of 50 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region (Blank), Jervis Bay Territory

    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
  • Bush & Beach Natives & Weeds Coastcare Workshop

    Bush & Beach Natives & Weeds Coastcare Workshop

    BUSH & BEACH NATIVES & WEEDS COASTCARE WORKSHOP - Introduction to FoTNP - Tomaree Ecology - Botany 101 - Common Coastal Native Species - Common Coastal Weed Species - Weeds & Native Look-a-likes - Bush Regeneration - Fingal Beach Site Visit (after lunch) OBJECTIVE To assist NPWS with conservation outcomes for Tomaree National Park ACTIVITIES - weed control / bush regeneration - threatened species management - education LOCATIONS North Tomaree Coast / Fishermans Bay /(Birubi / Fingal) workshop focus area Fishermans Bay work area Tomaree Headland Shoal Bay wetlands Zenith Beach Wreck Beach UPCOMING ACTIVITY Threatened species management: Prostanthera densa planting >> see Sue for more details Tomaree Ecology Tomaree Ecology - Key Factors - geology >> soils - water >> moderate rainfall - coastal setting >> wind + salt exposure - volcanic headlands > coastal / inland > exposed rock / sand mantle - pocket beaches & mobile dunes - stabilised sand dunes - freshwater swamps exposed rock freshwater swamps Fingal Spit in dune swales sand mantle Zenith Beach strand line foredune hind dune coastal forest moist gully protected leeward side (note canopy sand development) blowouts exposure to salt laden strong coastal winds drainage line land slips on steep slopes Botany 101 - Plant phylogeny & taxonomy - Plant habit & structure - Leaf characteristics Remember the general rule: There’s always exceptions to the rule! Botany 101 – Plant Phylogeny - workshop will mainly focus on Dicots - ignore Monocots = ferns, grasses, other lower plant groups Botany
  • Introduction Methods Results

    Introduction Methods Results

    Papers and Proceedings Royal Society ofTasmania, Volume 1999 103 THE CHARACTERISTICS AND MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS OF THE VEGETATION AND FLORA OF THE HUNTINGFIELD AREA, SOUTHERN TASMANIA by J.B. Kirkpatrick (with two tables, four text-figures and one appendix) KIRKPATRICK, J.B., 1999 (31:x): The characteristics and management problems of the vegetation and flora of the Huntingfield area, southern Tasmania. Pap. Proc. R. Soc. Tasm. 133(1): 103-113. ISSN 0080-4703. School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University ofTasmania, GPO Box 252-78, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7001. The Huntingfield area has a varied vegetation, including substantial areas ofEucalyptus amygdalina heathy woodland, heath, buttongrass moorland and E. amygdalina shrubbyforest, with smaller areas ofwetland, grassland and E. ovata shrubbyforest. Six floristic communities are described for the area. Two hundred and one native vascular plant taxa, 26 moss species and ten liverworts are known from the area, which is particularly rich in orchids, two ofwhich are rare in Tasmania. Four other plant species are known to be rare and/or unreserved inTasmania. Sixty-four exotic plantspecies have been observed in the area, most ofwhich do not threaten the native biodiversity. However, a group offire-adapted shrubs are potentially serious invaders. Management problems in the area include the maintenance ofopen areas, weed invasion, pathogen invasion, introduced animals, fire, mechanised recreation, drainage from houses and roads, rubbish dumping and the gathering offirewood, sand and plants. Key Words: flora, forest, heath, Huntingfield, management, Tasmania, vegetation, wetland, woodland. INTRODUCTION species with the most cover in the shrub stratum (dominant species) was noted. If another species had more than half The Huntingfield Estate, approximately 400 ha of forest, the cover ofthe dominant one it was noted as a codominant.
  • Kingdom Class Family Scientific Name Common Name I Q a Records

    Kingdom Class Family Scientific Name Common Name I Q a Records

    Kingdom Class Family Scientific Name Common Name I Q A Records animals amphibians Bufonidae Rhinella marina cane toad Y 12 animals amphibians Hylidae Litoria nasuta striped rocketfrog C 4/1 animals amphibians Hylidae Litoria peronii emerald spotted treefrog C 4 animals amphibians Hylidae Litoria rubella ruddy treefrog C 1/1 animals amphibians Hylidae Litoria wilcoxii eastern stony creek frog C 7 animals amphibians Hylidae Litoria gracilenta graceful treefrog C 3 animals amphibians Hylidae Litoria latopalmata broad palmed rocketfrog C 2 animals amphibians Hylidae Litoria cooloolensis Cooloola sedgefrog NT 1/1 animals amphibians Hylidae Litoria olongburensis wallum sedgefrog V V 1 animals amphibians Hylidae Litoria fallax eastern sedgefrog C 17 animals amphibians Hylidae Litoria freycineti wallum rocketfrog V 1 animals amphibians Limnodynastidae Limnodynastes tasmaniensis spotted grassfrog C 1 animals amphibians Limnodynastidae Limnodynastes terraereginae scarlet sided pobblebonk C 5 animals amphibians Limnodynastidae Platyplectrum ornatum ornate burrowing frog C 2 animals amphibians Limnodynastidae Limnodynastes peronii striped marshfrog C 11 animals amphibians Limnodynastidae Adelotus brevis tusked frog V 2 animals amphibians Myobatrachidae Crinia parinsignifera beeping froglet C 2 animals amphibians Myobatrachidae Mixophyes fasciolatus great barred frog C 2 animals amphibians Myobatrachidae Pseudophryne raveni copper backed broodfrog C 3 animals amphibians Myobatrachidae Mixophyes iteratus giant barred frog E E 9 animals amphibians Myobatrachidae
  • Ecological Influences in the Biogeography of the Austral Sedges

    Ecological Influences in the Biogeography of the Austral Sedges

    ECOLOGICALINFLUENCESINTHEBIOGEOGRAPHYOFTHE AUSTRALSEDGES jan-adriaan viljoen Dissertation presented in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MSc in Botany Department of Biological Sciences Faculty of Sciences University of Cape Town UniversityFebruary of2016 Cape Town The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town Jan-Adriaan Viljoen. Ecological influences in the biogeography of the aus- tral sedges. MSc dissertation. University of Cape Town. Cape Town. February 2016. supervisors: A. Muthama Muasya G. Anthony Verboom ABSTRACT The biogeographic history of a species is a result of both stochastic processes such as dispersal and habitat filters that determine where a population with a given set of biological requirements can become es- tablished. In this dissertation, I examine the geographical and ecolog- ical distribution of the sedge tribe Schoeneae in conjunction with its inferred speciation history in order to determine the pattern of disper- sal and the environmental factors that have influenced establishment. The biogeographic reconstruction indicates numerous transoceanic dispersal events consistent with random diffusion from an Australian point of origin, but with a bias towards habitats with vegetation type and moisture regime similar to the ancestral conditions of the given subgroup (open and dry habitats in the majority of cases). The global distribution of the tribe also suggests a preference for low-nutrient soils, which I investigate at the local (microhabitat) scale by contrast- ing the distributions of the tribes Schoeneae and Cypereae on the Cape Peninsula along soil fertility axes.
  • Flora and Fauna

    Flora and Fauna

    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Volume 2 Technical Papers MUNMORAH GAS TURBINE FACILITY MUNMORAH POWER STATION.indd 3 21/12/05 2:27:29 PM Contents Technical Papers (Volume 2) Technical Paper No.1 Flora and Fauna Assessment Technical Paper No.2 Heritage Assessment Technical Paper No.3 Noise Assessment Technical Paper No.4 Air Quality Impact Assessment Technical Paper No 5 Photochemical Pollution Assessment Technical Paper No 6 Preliminary Hazard Analysis FLORA AND FAUNA ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL PAPER DIVIDERS.indd 30 121/12/05 3:44:33 PM Technical Paper 1 Flora and Fauna Assessment of Munmorah Gas Turbine Facility December 2005 Delta Electricity Parsons Brinckerhoff Australia Pty Limited ACN 078 004 798 and Parsons Brinckerhoff International (Australia) Pty Limited ACN 006 475 056 trading as Parsons Brinckerhoff ABN 84 797 323 433 Level 27 Ernst & Young Centre 680 George Street Sydney NSW 2000 GPO Box 5394 Australia Telephone +61 2 9272 5100 Facsimile +61 2 9272 5101 Email [email protected] ABN 84 797 323 433 NCSI Certified Quality System ISO 9001 2116541A Parsons Brinckerhoff supports the Environment by PR_2467.doc printing on 100per cent A4 recycled paper ©Parsons Brinckerhoff Australia Pty Limited and Parsons Brinckerhoff International (Australia) Pty Limited trading as Parsons Brinckerhoff (“PB”). [2005] Copyright in the drawings, information and data recorded in this document (“the information”) is the property of PB. This document and the information are solely for the use of the authorised recipient and this document may not be used, copied or reproduced in whole or part for any purpose other than that for which it was supplied by PB.
  • Glossy Black-Cockatoo

    Glossy Black-Cockatoo

    Glossy black-cockatoo Calyptorynchus lathami Yuyang (Wiradjuri) Photo: Chris Tzaros The glossy black-cockatoo may be confused with the red-tailed black-cockatoo, but it has more brownish-black plumage on the head, neck and underbody. Their body plumage is more dull black and not uniformly glossy. Also, adult females have much more yellow on the head and lack the yellow spotting on the body that red-tailed black-cockatoos have. Description Size: The glossy black-cockatoo of the Riverina is a medium-sized cockatoo. Plumage: Glossy black-cockatoos are generally black but have a blackish-brown head, neck and underparts with red or yellowish-red panels in the tail. Adult females have patches of yellow feathering on head and neck. Bill: They have a broad bulbous bill that is used for tearing apart the seed cones of sheoaks, their primary food source, and to create hollows in old trees for nesting. Call: Noisy squawks or creaky calls; wheezy ‘airr-riick’, ‘kee-aiirrk’, ‘airrek’. Quieter and less raucous than other black-cockatoos. Photo: Chris Tzaros Habitat Glossy black-cockatoos can be found in open forest and woodlands of the coast and the Great Dividing Range where stands of sheoak occur, such as black sheoak (Allocasuarina littoralis) and forest sheoak (A. torulosa). Inland, they feed on drooping sheoak (A. verticillata), broombush sheoak (A. diminuta) and mallee sheoak (A. gymnanthera). Belah (Casuarina cristata) is also utilised and may be a critical food source for some populations. The Riverina population is largely restricted to hills and low ridges where suitable stands of its food plant, the drooping sheoak, remain.
  • Rare Or Threatened Vascular Plant Species of Wollemi National Park, Central Eastern New South Wales

    Rare Or Threatened Vascular Plant Species of Wollemi National Park, Central Eastern New South Wales

    Rare or threatened vascular plant species of Wollemi National Park, central eastern New South Wales. Stephen A.J. Bell Eastcoast Flora Survey PO Box 216 Kotara Fair, NSW 2289, AUSTRALIA Abstract: Wollemi National Park (c. 32o 20’– 33o 30’S, 150o– 151oE), approximately 100 km north-west of Sydney, conserves over 500 000 ha of the Triassic sandstone environments of the Central Coast and Tablelands of New South Wales, and occupies approximately 25% of the Sydney Basin biogeographical region. 94 taxa of conservation signiicance have been recorded and Wollemi is recognised as an important reservoir of rare and uncommon plant taxa, conserving more than 20% of all listed threatened species for the Central Coast, Central Tablelands and Central Western Slopes botanical divisions. For a land area occupying only 0.05% of these divisions, Wollemi is of paramount importance in regional conservation. Surveys within Wollemi National Park over the last decade have recorded several new populations of signiicant vascular plant species, including some sizeable range extensions. This paper summarises the current status of all rare or threatened taxa, describes habitat and associated species for many of these and proposes IUCN (2001) codes for all, as well as suggesting revisions to current conservation risk codes for some species. For Wollemi National Park 37 species are currently listed as Endangered (15 species) or Vulnerable (22 species) under the New South Wales Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995. An additional 50 species are currently listed as nationally rare under the Briggs and Leigh (1996) classiication, or have been suggested as such by various workers. Seven species are awaiting further taxonomic investigation, including Eucalyptus sp.
  • Redalyc.ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER?

    Redalyc.ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER?

    Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology ISSN: 1409-3871 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica BACKHOUSE, GARY N. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology, vol. 7, núm. 1-2, marzo, 2007, pp. 28- 43 Universidad de Costa Rica Cartago, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44339813005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative LANKESTERIANA 7(1-2): 28-43. 2007. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA GARY N. BACKHOUSE Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Division, Department of Sustainability and Environment 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002 Australia [email protected] KEY WORDS:threatened orchids Australia conservation status Introduction Many orchid species are included in this list. This paper examines the listing process for threatened Australia has about 1700 species of orchids, com- orchids in Australia, compares regional and national prising about 1300 named species in about 190 gen- lists of threatened orchids, and provides recommen- era, plus at least 400 undescribed species (Jones dations for improving the process of listing regionally 2006, pers. comm.). About 1400 species (82%) are and nationally threatened orchids. geophytes, almost all deciduous, seasonal species, while 300 species (18%) are evergreen epiphytes Methods and/or lithophytes. At least 95% of this orchid flora is endemic to Australia.
  • ACT, Australian Capital Territory

    ACT, Australian Capital Territory

    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.