DOCSLIB.ORG

Claudio Vallotto

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Claudio Vallotto A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick Permanent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/104986 Copyright and reuse: This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected] warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Techniques for Pharmaceutical Characterization and Drug Design by Claudio Vallotto Thesis Submitted to the University of Warwick for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Chemistry August 2017 Contents Title page .................................................................................................................................... i Contents ..................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ........................................................................................................................... ix Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................... xv Declaration and published work ............................................................................................. xvi Abstract ................................................................................................................................... xix Abbreviations and symbols ...................................................................................................... xx Chapter 1 Principles of EPR ...................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Uses of EPR ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Zeeman effect ........................................................................................................... 2 1.3 The spin Hamiltonian ....................................................................................................... 3 1.4 The g-factor ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Hyperfine interaction ....................................................................................................... 4 1.6 Multi-frequency EPR ....................................................................................................... 6 1.7 Spin trapping .................................................................................................................... 8 1.7.1 Spin trapping reaction ............................................................................................... 8 1.7.2 Choice of spin trapping agent ................................................................................... 8 1.8 References ...................................................................................................................... 10 Chapter 2 Sterilization of Pharmaceuticals .............................................................................. 13 2.1 Sterilization in the pharmaceutical industry ................................................................... 13 2.1.1 Dry heat sterilization ............................................................................................... 13 2.1.2 Steam sterilization ................................................................................................... 14 2.1.3 Ethylene oxide sterilization ..................................................................................... 14 2.1.4 Filtration sterilization .............................................................................................. 14 2.2 Radiation sterilization .................................................................................................... 14 2.2.1 Ionising radiation .................................................................................................... 15 ii 2.2.2 γ-irradiation sterilization ......................................................................................... 15 2.2.3 γ-sterilization of pharmaceuticals ........................................................................... 16 2.3 EPR in the detection of pharmaceutical degradants ....................................................... 17 2.4 Pharmaceutical excipients .............................................................................................. 17 2.5 Motivation of study ........................................................................................................ 19 2.6 Thesis outline ................................................................................................................. 20 2.7 References ...................................................................................................................... 21 Chapter 3 Experimental Methods ............................................................................................ 24 3.1 Experimental .................................................................................................................. 24 3.1.1 Materials.................................................................................................................. 24 3.2 Crystal growth ................................................................................................................ 24 3.2.1 Deuteration .............................................................................................................. 24 3.3 γ-irradiation .................................................................................................................... 25 3.3.1 Room temperature irradiation ................................................................................. 25 3.3.2 γ-irradiation in liquid nitrogen ................................................................................ 25 3.3.3 Removal of quartz background signal ..................................................................... 26 3.4 X-irradiation ................................................................................................................... 26 3.5 Instrumentation .............................................................................................................. 27 3.5.1 The EPR spectrometer ............................................................................................ 27 3.5.1.1 W-band EPR .................................................................................................... 29 3.5.1.2 mm-wave EPR ................................................................................................. 29 3.5.2 Low temperature ..................................................................................................... 30 3.5.3 Spin trapping ........................................................................................................... 31 3.5.3.1 Phosphate buffer solution ................................................................................. 32 3.5.3.2 Sample preparation .......................................................................................... 33 3.5.4 ENDOR ................................................................................................................... 33 3.5.5 1H NMR ................................................................................................................... 33 3.5.6 ESI-MS analysis ...................................................................................................... 34 3.5.7 XRF ......................................................................................................................... 34 iii 3.6 Quantitative EPR ........................................................................................................... 34 3.6.1.1 Quantification of persistent radicals in the solid state ...................................... 35 3.6.1.2 Quantification of spin adducts ......................................................................... 36 3.7 EPR simulations ............................................................................................................. 37 3.8 References ...................................................................................................................... 38 Chapter 4 Irradiation of L-histidine Free Base ........................................................................ 40 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 40 4.1.1 Use of L-histidine in parenteral formulations ......................................................... 40 4.1.2 Scavenging properties of histidine .......................................................................... 41 4.1.3 Solid state radicals .................................................................................................. 41 4.1.4 Spin trapped L-histidine radicals ............................................................................ 41 4.2 Experimental .................................................................................................................. 42 4.2.1 Instrumentation ....................................................................................................... 42 4.2.2 Sample preparation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cisplatin and Phenanthriplatin Modulate Long-Noncoding
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Cisplatin and phenanthriplatin modulate long‑noncoding RNA expression in A549 and IMR90 cells revealing regulation of microRNAs, Wnt/β‑catenin and TGF‑β signaling Jerry D. Monroe1,2, Satya A. Moolani2,3, Elvin N. Irihamye2,4, Katheryn E. Lett1, Michael D. Hebert1, Yann Gibert1* & Michael E. Smith2* The monofunctional platinum(II) complex, phenanthriplatin, acts by blocking transcription, but its regulatory efects on long‑noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have not been elucidated relative to traditional platinum‑based chemotherapeutics, e.g., cisplatin. Here, we treated A549 non‑small cell lung cancer and IMR90 lung fbroblast cells for 24 h with either cisplatin, phenanthriplatin or a solvent control, and then performed microarray analysis to identify regulated lncRNAs. RNA22 v2 microRNA software was subsequently used to identify microRNAs (miRNAs) that might be suppressed by the most regulated lncRNAs. We found that miR‑25‑5p, ‑30a‑3p, ‑138‑5p, ‑149‑3p, ‑185‑5p, ‑378j, ‑608, ‑650, ‑708‑5p, ‑1253, ‑1254, ‑4458, and ‑4516, were predicted to target the cisplatin upregulated lncRNAs, IMMP2L‑1, CBR3‑1 and ATAD2B‑5, and the phenanthriplatin downregulated lncRNAs, AGO2‑1, COX7A1‑2 and SLC26A3‑1. Then, we used qRT‑PCR to measure the expression of miR‑25‑5p, ‑378j, ‑4516 (A549) and miR‑149‑3p, ‑608, and ‑4458 (IMR90) to identify distinct signaling efects associated with cisplatin and phenanthriplatin. The signaling pathways associated with these miRNAs suggests that phenanthriplatin may modulate Wnt/β‑catenin and TGF‑β signaling through the MAPK/ ERK and PTEN/AKT pathways diferently than cisplatin. Further, as some of these miRNAs may be subject to dissimilar lncRNA targeting in A549 and IMR90 cells, the monofunctional complex may not cause toxicity in normal lung compared to cancer cells by acting through distinct lncRNA and miRNA networks.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dissertation Entitled the Role of Base Excision Repair And
    A Dissertation Entitled The Role of Base Excision Repair and Mismatch Repair Proteins in the Processing of Cisplatin Interstrand Cross-Links. by Akshada Sawant Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Biomedical Science Dr. Stephan M. Patrick, Committee Chair Dr. Kandace Williams, Committee Member Dr. William Maltese, Committee Member Dr. Manohar Ratnam, Committee Member Dr. David Giovannucci, Committee Member Dr. Patricia R. Komuniecki, Dean College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo August 2014 Copyright 2014, Akshada Sawant This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. An Abstract of The Role of Base Excision Repair and Mismatch Repair Proteins in the Processing of Cisplatin Interstrand Cross-Links By Akshada Sawant Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Biomedical Science The University of Toledo August 2014 Cisplatin is a well-known anticancer agent that forms a part of many combination chemotherapeutic treatments used against a variety of human cancers. Despite successful treatment, the development of resistance is the major limitation of the cisplatin based therapy. Base excision repair modulates cisplatin cytotoxicity. Moreover, mismatch repair deficiency gives rise to cisplatin resistance and leads to poor prognosis of the disease. Various models have been proposed to explain this low level of resistance caused due to loss of MMR proteins. In our previous studies, we have shown that BER processing of the cisplatin ICLs is mutagenic. Our studies showed that these mismatches lead to the activation and the recruitment of mismatch repair proteins.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Phenanthriplatin, a Novel Monofunctional Platinum Based Anticancer Drug Candidate, with Cisplatin, a Classic Bifunctional Anticancer Drug
    Comparison of Phenanthriplatin, A Novel Monofunctional Platinum Based Anticancer Drug Candidate, with Cisplatin, A Classic Bifunctional Anticancer Drug by Meiyi Li B.S., Chemistry Fudan University, 2010 Submitted to the Department of Chemistry in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of A1CH %r Master of Science in Inorganic Chemistry y At the Massachusetts Institute of Technology September 2012 5 212 @2012 Meiyi Li. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author: I '_ Department of Chemistry July 20, 2012 Certified by: Stephen J. Lippard Arthur Amc s Noyes Professor of Chemistry Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: Robert W. Field Haslam and Dewey Professor of Chemistry Chairman, Departmental Committee for Graduate Students Comparison of Phenanthriplatin, A Novel Monofunctional Platinum Based Anticancer Drug Candidate, with Cisplatin, A Classic Bifunctional Anticancer Drug by Meiyi Li B.S., Chemistry Fudan University, 2010 Submitted to the Department of Chemistry in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Inorganic Chemistry at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology July 2012 @2012 Meiyi Li. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. 1 Comparison of Phenanthriplatin, A Novel Monofunctional Platinum Based Anticancer Drug Candidate, with Cisplatin, A Classic Bifunctional Anticancer Drug by Meiyi Li Submitted to the Department of Chemistry on 2 0 th July, 2012, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Inorganic Chemistry Abstract Nucleotide excision repair, a DNA repair mechanism, is the major repair pathway responsible for removal of platinum-based anticancer drugs.
    [Show full text]
  • Combination of Oxoplatin with Other FDA-Approved Oncology Drugs
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Theoretical Prediction of Dual-Potency Anti-Tumor Agents: Combination of Oxoplatin with Other FDA-Approved Oncology Drugs José Pedro Cerón-Carrasco Reconocimiento y Encapsulación Molecular, Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia Campus los Jerónimos, 30107 Murcia, Spain; [email protected] Received: 16 April 2020; Accepted: 2 July 2020; Published: 3 July 2020 Abstract: Although Pt(II)-based drugs are widely used to treat cancer, very few molecules have been approved for routine use in chemotherapy due to their side-effects on healthy tissues. A new approach to reducing the toxicity of these drugs is generating a prodrug by increasing the oxidation state of the metallic center to Pt(IV), a less reactive form that is only activated once it enters a cell. We used theoretical tools to combine the parent Pt(IV) prodrug, oxoplatin, with the most recent FDA-approved anti-cancer drug set published by the National Institute of Health (NIH). The only prerequisite imposed for the latter was the presence of one carboxylic group in the structure, a chemical feature that ensures a link to the coordination sphere via a simple esterification procedure. Our calculations led to a series of bifunctional prodrugs ranked according to their relative stabilities and activation profiles. Of all the designed molecules, the combination of oxoplatin with aminolevulinic acid as the bioactive ligand emerged as the most promising strategy by which to design enhanced dual-potency oncology drugs. Keywords: cancer; drug design; organometallics; platinum-based drugs; bifunctional compounds; theoretical tools 1. Introduction The unexpected discovery of the bioactivity of Pt salts by Rosenberg about 60 years ago opened the door to a new type of cancer treatment: chemotherapy with transition metals [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2003.01418V1 [Physics.Chem-Ph] 3 Mar 2020
    Blue moon ensemble simulation of aquation free energy profiles applied to mono and bifunctional platinum anticancer drugs Teruo Hirakawa,1, 2 David R. Bowler,3, 4, 5 Tsuyoshi Miyazaki,6, 5 Yoshitada Morikawa,1, 7, 8 and Lionel A. Truflandier2, 1, a) 1)Department of Precision Science and Technology, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, 2-1, Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan 2)Institut des Sciences Mol´eculaires (ISM), Universit´eBordeaux, CNRS UMR 5255, 351 cours de la Lib´eration, 33405 Talence cedex, France 3)Department of Physics & Astronomy, University College London (UCL), Gower St, London, WC1E 6BT, UK 4)London Centre for Nanotechnology, UCL, 17-19 Gordon St, London WC1H 0AH, UK 5)Centre for Materials Nanoarchitechtonics (MANA), National Institute for Materials Science (NIMS), 1-1 Namiki, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0044, Japan 6)Computational Materials Science Unit (CMSU), NIMS, 1-1 Namiki, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0044, Japan 7)Elements Strategy Initiative for Catalysts and Batteries (ESICB), Kyoto University, Katsura, Kyoto 615-8520, Japan 8)Research Center for Ultra-Precision Science and Technology, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, 2-1, Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan (Dated: 4 March 2020) Aquation free energy profiles of neutral cisplatin and cationic mono- functional derivatives, including triaminochloroplatinum(II) and cis- diammine(pyridine)chloroplatinum(II), were computed using state of the art thermodynamic integration, for which temperature and solvent were accounted for explicitly using density functional theory based canonical molecular dynamics (DFT-MD). For all the systems the "inverse-hydration" where the metal center acts as an acceptor of hydrogen bond has been observed.
    [Show full text]
  • A Subset of Platinum-Containing Chemotherapeutic Agents Kill Cells by Inducing Ribosome Biogenesis Stress Rather Than by Engaging a DNA Damage Response
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE HHS Public Access provided by DSpace@MIT Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author Nat Med Manuscript Author . Author manuscript; Manuscript Author available in PMC 2017 October 01. Published in final edited form as: Nat Med. 2017 April ; 23(4): 461–471. doi:10.1038/nm.4291. A subset of platinum-containing chemotherapeutic agents kill cells by inducing ribosome biogenesis stress rather than by engaging a DNA damage response Peter M. Bruno1,2, Yunpeng Liu1,2, Ga Young Park3, Junko Murai4, Catherine E. Koch1,2, Timothy J. Eisen2,5, Justin R. Pritchard1,2, Yves Pommier4, Stephen J. Lippard1,3, and Michael T. Hemann1,2 1The Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 2Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 3Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 4Developmental Therapeutics Branch and Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA 5Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA Abstract Cisplatin and its platinum analogues, carboplatin and oxaliplatin, are some of the most widely used cancer chemotherapeutics. However, although cisplatin and carboplatin are primarily used in germ cell, breast and lung malignancies, oxaliplatin is instead used almost exclusively in colorectal and other gastrointestinal cancers. Here, we utilize a unique multi-platform genetic approach to study the mechanism of action of these clinically established platinum anti-cancer agents as well as more recently developed cisplatin analogues.
    [Show full text]
  • Monofunctional Platinum(II) Compounds and Nucleolar Stress: Is Phenanthriplatin Unique?
    JBIC Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry (2019) 24:899–908 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00775-019-01707-9 ORIGINAL PAPER Monofunctional platinum(II) compounds and nucleolar stress: is phenanthriplatin unique? Christine E. McDevitt1 · Matthew V. Yglesias1,2 · Austin M. Mroz1,3 · Emily C. Sutton2,4 · Min Chieh Yang1,3 · Christopher H. Hendon1,3 · Victoria J. DeRose1,2,3 Received: 17 July 2019 / Accepted: 13 August 2019 / Published online: 7 September 2019 © Society for Biological Inorganic Chemistry (SBIC) 2019 Abstract Platinum anticancer therapeutics are widely used in a variety of chemotherapy regimens. Recent work has revealed that the cytotoxicity of oxaliplatin and phenanthriplatin is through induction of ribosome biogenesis stress pathways, diferentiat- ing them from cisplatin and other compounds that mainly work through DNA damage response mechanisms. To probe the structure–activity relationships in phenanthriplatin’s ability to cause nucleolar stress, a series of monofunctional platinum(II) compounds difering in ring number, size and orientation was tested by nucleophosmin (NPM1) relocalization assays using A549 cells. Phenanthriplatin was found to be unique among these compounds in inducing NPM1 relocalization. To decipher underlying reasons, computational predictions of steric bulk, platinum(II) compound surface length and hydrophobicity were performed for all compounds. Of the monofunctional platinum(II) compounds tested, phenanthriplatin has the highest calculated hydrophobicity and volume but does not exhibit the largest distance from platinum(II) to the surface. Thus, spatial orientation and/or hydrophobicity caused by the presence of a third aromatic ring may be signifcant factors in the ability of phenanthriplatin to cause nucleolar stress. Graphic abstract Keywords Platinum · Anticancer drug · Cell death · Structure–activity relationship · Computational chemistry · Imaging · Nucleolus * Victoria J.
    [Show full text]
  • High Aspect Ratio Viral Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy
    HIGH ASPECT RATIO VIRAL NANOPARTICLES FOR CANCER THERAPY By Karin L. Lee Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Nicole F. Steinmetz Biomedical Engineering CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY August 2016 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis/dissertation of Karin L. Lee candidate for the Doctor of Philosophy degree*. (signed) Horst von Recum (chair of the committee) Nicole Steinmetz Ruth Keri David Schiraldi (date) June 29, 2016 *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents List of Tables .................................................................................................................... ix List of Figures and Schemes .............................................................................................x Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................ xiv List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................... xvii Abstract......................................................................................................................... xxiii Chapter 1: Introduction ....................................................................................................1 1.1 Cancer statistics...............................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding and Improving Platinum Anticancer Drugs – Phenanthriplatin
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH 34: 471-476 (2014) Review Understanding and Improving Platinum Anticancer Drugs – Phenanthriplatin TIMOTHY C. JOHNSTONE1, GA YOUNG PARK1 and STEPHEN J. LIPPARD1,2* 1Department of Chemistry and 2Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, U.S.A. Abstract. Approximately half of all patients who receive cells can acquire resistance over time through a process of anticancer chemotherapy are treated with a platinum drug. somatic evolution (4). Moreover, a number of side-effects, Despite the widespread use of these drugs, the only cure ranging from minor to dose-limiting in toxicity, accompany that can be claimed is that of testicular cancer following treatment with platinum agents (5). In an attempt to cisplatin treatment. This article reviews some of our recent circumvent these problems, a large number of platinum work on phenanthriplatin, a cisplatin derivative in which a complexes have been prepared and tested for anticancer chloride ion is replaced by phenanthridine, and on one of activity. One strategy that has been used by chemists has its analogues, the previously reported pyriplatin. These been to devise target compounds that differ significantly cationic complexes form monofunctional adducts on DNA from those prescribed by the traditional structure–activity that do not significantly distort the duplex, yet efficiently relationships (SARs) established in the 1970s (6). Such ‘non- block transcription. Cell-based assays reveal altered classical’ platinum complexes include Pt(IV) pro-drugs, cellular uptake properties and a cancer cell-killing profile complexes with trans stereochemistry, polyplatinum different from those of established platinum drugs. compounds, platinum-tethered intercalators, and Mechanistic work, including a crystal structure analysis of monofunctional complexes.
    [Show full text]
  • Repair Shielding of Platinum-DNA Lesions in Testicular Germ Cell Tumors by High-Mobility Group Box Protein 4 Imparts Cisplatin Hypersensitivity
    Repair shielding of platinum-DNA lesions in testicular germ cell tumors by high-mobility group box protein 4 imparts cisplatin hypersensitivity Samuel G. Awuaha, Imogen A. Riddella, and Stephen J. Lipparda,b,1 aDepartment of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139; and bKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 Contributed by Stephen J. Lippard, November 28, 2016 (sent for review June 8, 2016; reviewed by Cynthia J. Burrows, Paul W. Doetsch, and Aziz Sancar) Cisplatin is the most commonly used anticancer drug for the intrastrand cross-links (23). These cysteines can form a disulfide treatment of testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs). The hypersensi- bond under mild oxidizing conditions, which significantly reduces tivity of TGCTs to cisplatin is a subject of widespread interest. their ability to bind to cisplatin-modified DNA (24). Because the Here, we show that high-mobility group box protein 4 (HMGB4), a intracellular redox potential, buffered by glutathione, will generate protein preferentially expressed in testes, uniquely blocks excision a mixture of oxidized and reduced forms of HMGB1, HMGB1 repair of cisplatin-DNA adducts, 1,2-intrastrand cross-links, to poten- sensitization of cancer cells to cisplatin by repair shielding can be tiate the sensitivity of TGCTs to cisplatin therapy. We used CRISPR/ compromised and will depend on cell type (25). Cas9-mediated gene editing to knockout the HMGB4 gene in a HMGB4 has two tandem HMG domains, A and B, homologous testicular human embryonic carcinoma and examined cellular re- to those in HMGB1, and a shortened C-terminal tail that lacks the sponses.
    [Show full text]
  • Platinum Complexes in Colorectal Cancer and Other Solid Tumors
    cancers Review Platinum Complexes in Colorectal Cancer and Other Solid Tumors Beate Köberle 1,* and Sarah Schoch 2 1 Department of Food Chemistry and Toxicology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Adenauerring 20a, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany 2 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Scheelevägen 2, 223 81 Lund, Sweden; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-721-608-42933 Simple Summary: Cisplatin is successfully used for the treatment of various solid cancers. Unfortu- nately, it shows no activity in colorectal cancer. The resistance phenotype of colorectal cancer cells is mainly caused by alterations in p53-controlled DNA damage signaling and/or defects in the cellular mismatch repair pathway. Improvement of platinum-based chemotherapy in cisplatin-unresponsive cancers, such as colorectal cancer, might be achieved by newly designed cisplatin analogues, which retain activity in unresponsive tumor cells. Moreover, a combination of cisplatin with biochemical modulators of DNA damage signaling might sensitize cisplatin-resistant tumor cells to the drug, thus providing another strategy to improve cancer therapy. Abstract: Cisplatin is one of the most commonly used drugs for the treatment of various solid neoplasms, including testicular, lung, ovarian, head and neck, and bladder cancers. Unfortunately, the therapeutic efficacy of cisplatin against colorectal cancer is poor. Various mechanisms appear to contribute to cisplatin resistance in cancer cells, including reduced drug accumulation, enhanced drug detoxification, modulation of DNA repair mechanisms, and finally alterations in cisplatin Citation: Köberle, B.; Schoch, S. DNA damage signaling preventing apoptosis in cancer cells. Regarding colorectal cancer, defects in Platinum Complexes in Colorectal Cancer and Other Solid Tumors.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural and Mechanistic Studies of Polymerase Η Bypass of Phenanthriplatin DNA Damage
    Structural and mechanistic studies of polymerase η bypass of phenanthriplatin DNA damage Mark T. Gregorya,b, Ga Young Parkc, Timothy C. Johnstonec, Young-Sam Leea, Wei Yanga, and Stephen J. Lippardc,1 aLaboratory of Molecular Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and bThe Johns Hopkins University–National Institutes of Health Graduate Partnership Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; and cDepartment of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 Edited by Gregory A. Petsko, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, and approved May 14, 2014 (received for review March 27, 2014) Platinum drugs are a mainstay of anticancer chemotherapy. and lesion removal prevent the stalling of polymerases that read Nevertheless, tumors often display inherent or acquired resistance DNA and the consequent induction of apoptosis (7). Cancer to platinum-based treatments, prompting the search for new com- cells also use polymerases that can replicate through platinum pounds that do not exhibit cross-resistance with current therapies. lesions that persist or form during DNA replication to prevent Phenanthriplatin, cis-diamminephenanthridinechloroplatinum(II), is a stalling (8). Translesion synthesis (TLS) is a mechanism naturally potent monofunctional platinum complex that displays a spectrum used by cells to prevent common DNA damage from stalling of activity distinct from those of the clinically approved platinum replication forks and giving rise to high levels of apoptosis (9, drugs. Inhibition of RNA polymerases by phenanthriplatin lesions 10). For cisplatin resistance in particular, TLS seems to be has been implicated in its mechanism of action. The present study critical. Cisplatin treatment efficacy is inversely correlated to evaluates the ability of phenanthriplatin lesions to inhibit DNA repli- expression levels of DNA polymerase η (Pol η), a replicative cation, a function disrupted by traditional platinum drugs.
    [Show full text]