DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Resident Submissions to the Borough of Poole Electoral Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Resident Submissions to the Borough of Poole Electoral Review Local resident submissions to the Borough of Poole electoral review This PDF document contains 56 submissions surnames P-Z. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Click on the submission you would like to view. If you are not taken to that page, please scroll through the document. Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 2 Poole Personal Details: Name: Ronald Planner E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Map Features: Comment text: We live at Edwina Drive, and strongly object to the boundry being changed to bring us into the Creekmoor Ward. Our church, supermarkets,shops, doctor, dentist,chiropractor and library are all in Broadstone, where we regularly vis t and we are part of that community not that of Creekmoor. We therefore want to continue to vote for Broadstone councillors, so that we can continue to have a say in our own area. https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk//node/print/informed-representation/2721 12/12/2013 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 2 of 2 https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk//node/print/informed-representation/2721 12/12/2013 Fuller, Heather From: Evison, Alison Sent: 07 January 2014 11:13 To: Kingsley, Paul Cc: Fuller, Heather Subject: FW: Dorset - Poole area proposed boundary changes Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged From: Tony Preston Sent: 05 January 2014 10:52 To: Evison, Alison Subject: Dorset - Poole area proposed boundary changes Dear Alison, I understand that the Government Boundary Commission are looking at moving parts of Broadstone into the Creekmoor ward, my family & I live in an area called Pinesprings within the Broadstone area which under the current proposals would be split into two distinct areas & would see the part we live in fall under a Creekmoor ward. We would like to say that we are strongly opposed to the potential boundary ward changes based upon the following :‐ We very much feel allied to the Broadstone area, as our Doctors are there, our banks are there, we shop there, and we use the Post Office & the Library facilities & much more. Pinesprings was designed & built as a complete entity & should not be split up. Broadstone & Creekmoor are not only separated by natural terrain but also by the Castlemain Trailway. Our son until recently was schooled in Broadstone schools. Broadstone has a strong community feel to it, this should not be undermined. We feel very proud to be part of Broadstone & its community, by moving our part of Broadstone into Creekmoor would I feel make us feel like outsiders. 1 Please would you reconsider your current proposals to move parts of Broadstone to within the Creekmoor ward & seek alternative solutions as suggested by the local Lib Dem & Conservative councillors who both have workable solutions that keep Broadstone intact – as it should be! Kind Regards Anthony, & Joanna Preston. 2 Kingsley, Paul From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 29 October 2013 08:42 To: Kingsley, Paul Subject: FW: POOLE WARD BOUNDARIES REVIEW Categories: Poole From: John Probert Sent: 28 October 2013 10:17 To: Reviews@ Cc: Subject: POOLE WARD BOUNDARIES REVIEW Dear Sirs, The Local Government Boundaries Commission is currently reviewing ward boundaries in Poole. We elect Members of Parliament on the basis if single-member constituencies where each elector has one vote. Is there any reason why "one member one vote" cannot also apply to the election of councillors in the Borough of Poole? Yours faithfully, John Probert 1 Fuller, Heather From: Dr Ramsden Sent: 03 January 2014 17:11 To: Reviews@ Subject: Poole Sir Having lived on Oakley Hill, for the last 2½ years, I wish to ask that the Commission gives serious thought to restoring the area where we live to Wimborne. The postal address is Wimborne and there can be no doubt that the vast majority of residents regard Wimborne as their town and as such conduct most of their business there. Speaking for my wife and myself, 85‐90% of our regular shopping is done in Wimborne, our G.P.’s surgery is in Wimborne, we are members of a Church in Wimborne. On top of that the public transport links to Poole are poor, being subject to two circuitous routes through housing developments, and do not take in either the hospital or the railway station. I recognize, of course, that the River Stour offers an apparently convenient boundary, but by the same token there is a significant band of land, between Merley and Broadstone, which would serve just as well, no less clearly and make much greater sense. Since I cannot conceive that anyone in their right mind would try to pretend that we lived other than in Wimborne, please acknowledge this reality by adjusting the boundary appropriately. Yours faithfully Dr. J. T. Ramsden 1 Fuller, Heather From: Kingsley, Paul Sent: 16 December 2013 13:36 To: Fuller, Heather Subject: Proposed changes to the Broadstone and Creekmoor (Poole) ward boundary Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Categories: Talk to Paul From: Andrew Reynolds Sent: 13 December 2013 17:43 To: Evison, Alison Cc: Subject: Proposed changes to the Broadstone and Creekmoor (Poole) ward boundary Dear Miss Evison, I am a resident in Sorrel Gardens, and I have learned that the Boundary Commission is again reviewing the proposed boundary between the Creekmoor and Broadstone wards. Looking at your website it appears that the current line proposed keeps Sorrel Gardens within the Broadstone ward. I understand that certain political groups may be seeking to propose that Sorrel Gardens, and other roads within the immediate Pinesprings neighbourhood locality, should be moved from the Broadstone to the Creekmore ward. I have seen no evidence of this and to date the Council’s Report that is due to go to Full Council on 17th December 2013 is not currently available to view. I am totally opposed to any proposal that feels it can justify moving Sorrel Gardens to be within the Creekmoor ward. Creekmoor is a completely separate neighbourhood to that of Broadstone, which Sorrel Gardens and the Pinesprings neighbourhood is closely associated with. There is a distinct natural geological separation between Sorrel Gardens and other Pinespring Roads with that of Creekmoor. The Pinesprings development was an extension to Broadstone, not Creekmoor, and should remain as a single neighbourhood rather than being split. The majority of the children attend the primary, secondary and upper schools within Broadstone and as such play a significant role in supporting many events in Broadstone as well as the local businesses after school and at weekends. Many of us are affiliated to the Broadstone Residents Association and Neighbourhood Watch scheme. Public transport routes directly connect Pinesprings residents to Broadstone, there is direct route from Creekmoor. We support local businesses in Broadstone, it is a rare example of a thriving centre with a good range of independent retailers, all of whom rely on our continuing trade. Your previous Report did not support any change and I fail to see why this is again being considered. There has been no major new development in either ward that has dramatically altered the population that creates a potential in balance in the local population ratio to the number of councillors. Such a change may also affect voter turnout as many residents would not wish to go in to Creekmoor to vote. Please take these comments as my formal response to your consultation. Kind regards, Andrew 1 ___________________________________________ Registered in England 6868846 VAT number 948199369 Please consider your environment ‐ think before you print 2 Fuller, Heather From: Kingsley, Paul Sent: 16 December 2013 13:49 To: Fuller, Heather Subject: FW: Proposed Boundary change - Broadstone Ward - Dorset Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Categories: Talk to Paul ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: hugh richards Sent: 14 December 2013 20:56 To: Evison, Alison Subject: Proposed Boundary change ‐ Broadstone Ward ‐ Dorset Dear Madam In framing this email opposing the proposed boundary changes it is necessary for me to ask whether statutory consultation procedures have been followed by Poole Council Officers and indeed the Commissioners in respect of the consultation timetable/communication with residents potentially affected. I await your response on these issues. If indeed there are discrepancies could I suggest that to avoid the risk of legal challenge and give residents a reasonable time period to respond the deadline be put back. 3 years ago my partner Pippa Longley and I relocated from Creekmoor to Broadstone Pine Springs Being a physically fit person I run through areas of Creekmoor and Broadstone every day ‐ I used to compete at international level ‐ and am always struck by how the natural terrain separates out the 2 geographic areas. Creekmoor is a distinctive geographic area in its own right as is Broadstone. What both my partner and I find so positive is the Community feel of Broadstone. This is evident to us in the local businesses /schools/ groups in Broadstone including our doctors' surgery, local amateur dramatics,sports centre, banks and the large number of local shops, all of which we support. In the short time we have lived here we have developed a tremendous affinity with Broadstone and would strongly oppose Pine Springs being hived off. We have both studied the literature which has arrived from the local Lib Dem Party and very much at the last minute from the local Conservative Party. We are in favour of a proposal which has enmerged to have 2 wards for Broadstone ‐ East and West ‐ both with 2 councillors, and keeping Pine Springs in what would be Broadstone West. To restate, we strongly oppose Pine Springs being hived off to be part of the Creeemoor Ward.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 71 Creekmoor Lane Creekmoor Poole BH17 7BW Price Guide £250000
    71 Creekmoor Lane Creekmoor Poole BH17 7BW Price Guide £250,000 - £255,000 Freehold A TWO DOUBLE BEDROOM DETACHED BUNGALOW SITUATED IN A POPULAR RESIDENTIAL LOCATION WITHIN EASY ACCESS OF LOCAL SHOPS 71 CREEKMOOR LANE, CREEKMOOR, POOLE. 2/ 71 CREEKMOOR LANE, CREEKMOOR, POOLE. 3/ ∗ ENTRANCE HALLWAY ∗ LOUNGE/DINING ROOM 21’11” (MAXIMUM) x 13’2” (MAXIMUM) ∗ SEPARATE DINING ROOM 10’1” x 9’9” ∗ MODERN FITTED KITCHEN 10’6” x 7’ ∗ CONSERVATORY/UTILITY ROOM 8’6” x 7’7” ∗ MASTER BEDROOM 10’1” (EXCLUDING BAY) x 9’9” ∗ GUEST BEDROOM 10’1” (EXCLUDING BAY) x 9’9” ∗ FAMILY BATHROOM 9’3” x 5’4” ∗ OFF ROAD PARKING ∗ GOOD SIZE REAR GARDEN ∗ GAS FIRED CENTRAL HEATING ∗ UPVC DOUBLE GLAZED 71 CREEKMOOR LANE, CREEKMOOR, POOLE. 4/ 71 CREEKMOOR LANE, CREEKMOOR, POOLE. 5/ 71 CREEKMOOR LANE, CREEKMOOR, POOLE. 6/ 71 CREEKMOOR LANE, CREEKMOOR, POOLE. 7/ ABOUT THIS PROPERTY A double glazed frosted front door with matching side screen gives access to the small entrance porch which in turn via a timber glazed door leads into the entrance hallway which has wood effect flooring and loft access via a hatch. The spacious lounge/dining room has TV point, telephone point and sliding patio doors to the rear garden. The separate dining room has partially frosted window to side aspect, wall mounted boiler and access in to the modern kitchen which has a range of wall and floor mounted cupboards, roll top work surfaces, nest of four drawers, single sink with drainer and mixer tap, integrated appliances include oven, four ring hob and extractor fan over.
    [Show full text]
  • Borough of Poole Unitary Authority Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment
    APPENDIX 1 Borough of Poole Unitary Authority Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment Draft Final Report v3 June 2011 1. Executive Summary This report has been prepared to assist Borough of Poole in meeting their duties to manage local flood risk and deliver the requirements of the Flood Risk Regulations (2009). The Borough of Poole, as a unitary authority, is defined as a lead local flood authority (LLFA) within the regulations. This report represents the first stage of the requirements set out in the regulations. The Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment (PFRA) process is aimed at providing a high level overview of flood risk from local sources, primarily flooding from surface water, groundwater and ordinary watercourses. Flooding associated with the sea, main rivers and reservoirs is the responsibility of the Environment Agency and does not need to be considered as part of this report. The completed PFRA report must be submitted by Borough of Poole to the Environment Agency for review by 22 June 2011. The PFRA has been produced based on the Environment Agency‟s Final PFRA Guidance and Defra‟s Guidance on selecting Flood Risk Areas, both published in December 2010. Using the national methodology set by Defra, the Environment Agency identified indicative Flood Risk Areas across England. Of the ten areas identified, none of these fall within the Borough of Poole. This simply means that parts of the PFRA mandatory documentation is not applicable to Poole and therefore will not require completion. In order to gain a clearer understanding of the flood risk across the Borough of Poole, flood risk data and historic flood events were collected from local and national sources, the Environment Agency, water companies, emergency services and other risk management authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Boundary Review 2013 England Secondary Consultation
    Boundary Review 2013 England Secondary Consultation Submission of the Labour Party Page 1 of 50 1) General Points a) Submission This submission is made on behalf of the Labour Party and the nine regional Labour parties within England. The submission represents the Labour’s Party’s response to the representations made to the Commission, both orally at the public hearings and in writing during the Initial Consultation Period and published by the Commission on 6 March 2012. The Labour Party made a detailed formal submission of its own which included a number of counter proposals. We have now considered the options further in each region, including those counter proposals submitted by others. We will refer to them in this response. While we are not formally amending our submission we will indicate those points and proposals with which we agree, and those with which we disagree. b) Factors to be considered In assessing the merits of different proposals we will as far as possible be guided by the stipulations of Clause 5 (1) of Schedule 2 to the Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Act 2011 which lays down the rules by which the Commission shall conduct the review. Under the terms of the Act1, the Commission may, in choosing between different schemes, take into account i) Special Geographical Circumstances, including the size shape and accessibility of a constituency ii) Local government boundaries iii) The boundaries of existing constituencies iv) Any local ties that would be broken by changes to constituencies 1 Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Act 2011, Schedule 2 Clause 5 (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Poole Matters
    Poole Matters Delivering for You in Creekmoor 2019 SUCCESS FOR YOU IN CREEKMOOR, HILLBOURNE & WATERLOO NEW SCHOOL IN HILLBOURNE FOR 2020 134 NEW AFFORDABLE/SHARED OWNERSHIP HOMES NEW ZEBRA CROSSING ON UPTON ROAD £95,000 COUNCIL GRANT FOR “ROOM TO GROW PROJECT” YOUR NEW COUNCIL WHAT WILL BOURNEMOUTH CHRISTCHURCH & POOLE COUNCIL (BCP) MEAN FOR CONSERVATIVES HELP YOU? RESIDENTS CLEAN UP 1 Services will continue as usual - you should see no noticeable changes. 2 Essential “Front Line” services will be protected. BUILDING HOMES BETTER 3 Poole Civic Centre remains “open for AND FASTER business” for the foreseeable future. STEVE HAYES our new prospective 4 We’ll take best practice from the 3 Creekmoor Ward Candidate existing Councils to the new Council. met with the Housing Minister Kit Malthouse. 5 We’ll ensure Creekmoor retains a strong voice in the new Council. Steve with 35 years experience in Social Housing said, “Working with the local community is key to providing more truly ‘Affordable’ quality homes, building them 2019 AND BEYOND better and faster”! YOU ASKED WE ANSWERED YOUR WARD SURGERIES How many Cllrs will be on the No - there will now be 76 Cllrs new BCP Council, is it still 120? saving £500k a year! Want to talk directly with your Councillors? Why are 2 new Dorset Councils, being Both Councils will have a bigger We hold regular surgeries open to all created, replacing the 9 existing voice to attract better Government Creekmoor residents at Creekmoor Library on Councils? funding. the first Monday of each month, 4-6pm. How many Cllrs will represent the No - there will be 2 Cllrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Ward Profile – Creekmoor Produced by the Corporate Research Team, Borough of Poole – Mar 2016
    Ward Profile – Creekmoor Produced by the Corporate Research Team, Borough of Poole – Mar 2016 Ward Profile – Creekmoor 1 Purpose of this profile The ward profiles provide an ongoing information update on social and economic data for all of Poole’s sixteen wards. Each profile compares against average Poole figures. As far as possible the statistical information within this document is the most recently available at the time. Data sources are identified for each chart and table. These profiles use data from the 2011 Census however more in-depth Census Ward profiles were produced by the Corporate Research Team in August 2013. Please go to www.boroughofpoole.com/2011census for more information on the 2011 Census. Ward boundaries were changed slightly in 2014. These profiles are based on boundaries prior to this date. New profiles will be prepared for the new ward boundaries in due course. Overview Creekmoor Ward is located in the west of Poole and shares boundaries with Broadstone, Canford Heath West, Oakdale and Hamworthy West. Residential areas are located in the north, west and central areas of the ward, with an industrial/retail area in the east. Upton House and Upton Country Park are located in the south and the Castleman Trailway runs from Upton Country Park, through Creekmoor to Merley. There is no dentist located within the ward boundary, or within 250 metres of the boundary in neighbouring wards. However there is a dental repair service that has an office on Marshal Road. Political Representation Creekmoor Ward is represented by three Conservative Party councillors – Les Burden, Judy Butt and John Rampton.
    [Show full text]
  • Ward Profile – Broadstone Produced by the Corporate Research and GIS Teams – Mar 2016
    Ward Profile – Broadstone Produced by the Corporate Research and GIS Teams – Mar 2016 Ward Profile – Broadstone 1 Purpose of this profile The ward profiles provide an ongoing information update on social and economic data for all of Poole’s sixteen wards. Each profile compares against average Poole figures. As far as possible the statistical information within this document is the most recently available at the time. Data sources are indentified for each chart and table. These profiles use data from the 2011 Census however more in-depth Census Ward profiles were produced by the Corporate Research Team in August 2013. Please go to www.boroughofpoole.com/2011census for more information on the 2011 Census. Ward boundaries were changed slightly in 2014. These profiles are based on boundaries prior to this date. New profiles will be prepared for the new ward boundaries in due course. Overview Broadstone ward is located to the west of Poole and shares boundaries with Merley and Bearwood, Canford Heath West and Creekmoor Wards. The north of the ward is mainly covered by green space, consisting of Delph Woods, the Castleman Trailway (runs from Creekmoor to Merley) and Broadstone golf course. Broadstone Recreation Ground is located to the South East of the ward. The remainder of the ward is mostly residential, with local facilities and retail clustered around the high street in the centre of the ward (lower Blandford Road). There is a post office located on Dunyeats Road. Political Representation Broadstone Ward is represented by one Liberal Democrat Councillor, Mike Brooke and two Conservative Councillors, David Newall and Joanne Tomlin.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Resident Submissions to the Poole Borough Council Electoral Review
    Local resident submissions to the Poole Borough Council electoral review This PDF document contains 28 submissions with surnames L- R. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Click on the submission you would like to view. If you are not taken to that page, please scroll through the document. From: Peter Lambert Sent: 19 June 2014 01:14 To: Reviews@ Subject: Boundry Consultation Dear Sir Madam I have read the draft proposals from the Boundary Commissioner in respect to Creekmoor and Broadstone in Poole, Dorset and I fully support the Boundary Commissioner’s proposals as the least disruptive of the options, with minimal change to the local community that ensures the close community feel of Creekmoor is maintained. Regards Peter Lambert Kingsley, Paul From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 06 May 2014 09:27 To: Kingsley, Paul Subject: FW: Boundary changes to Broadstone Categories: Poole, Submission From: Simon Lander Sent: 02 May 2014 21:31 To: Reviews@ Subject: Boundary changes to Broadstone Dear sirs, We are writing regarding the boundary changes to the Broadstone Area. As a resident of we are firmly against any changes to our boundary , we moved here 3 years ago to bring our family up within the Broadstone area, due to the area being very well respected & having great schools , we paid around £250,000 for a house which if it wasn't within this boundary and was in the creekmoor boundary the same size property would have been around £20‐ 30,000 less. We like living in the Broadstone community and are very happy here & our child is going to one of the Broadstone Schools, we are somewhat confused as to why these changes have been put forward or are going to be put forward as we can see that this would not gain anything from this but would cause a lot of bad feeling amongst the Broadstone residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Keyline Pool
    TRADE COUNTER INVESTMENT LET TO TRAVIS PERKINS (PROPERTIES) LTD AND GUARANTEED BY TRAVIS PERKINS PLC - 18.5 YEARS WITH RPI LINKED REVIEWS CREEKMOOR LANE, POOLE, DORSET, BH17 7EE 18.5 years unexpired to Travis Perkins (Properties) Ltd and guaranteed by Travis Perkins Plc Investment Summary Location & Situation •Afreehold trade counter investment located in Poole, an affuent town on Poole is an affuent town on the south coast of England, located approximately the south coast of England 6 miles to the west of Bournemouth and 11 miles to the west of Christchurch. Bristol is located 69 miles to the north and Exeter is 80 miles to the west. • Two warehouse units totalling approximately 12,278 sq ft and a site of 1.32 acres representing a low site cover of just 20% Poole benefts from excellent road connections with the A35 providing the main arterial route along the south coast linking to Bournemouth, Christchurch and • Let to Travis Perkins (Properties) Ltd, trading as Keyline, with Southampton to the east and Dorchester and Exeter to the west. approximately 18.5 years unexpired and guaranteed by Travis Perkins Plc The A348, A349 and A350 all lead to the A31 to the north and onto the M3 and • A current passing rent of £110,408.05 per annum (£8.99 per sq ft overall) M27 Motorways. The M3 links Poole to the M25 and London and the M27 links subject to 5-yearly rent reviews linked to RPI (2% and 4% per annum to Bournemouth and Southampton. collar and cap) Poole railway station provides direct services to London Waterloo with an • The passing rent equates to a conservative £6.82 per sq ft if applying a half- approximate journey time of 2 hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Poole Borough Council Election Results 1973-1995
    Poole Borough Council Election Results 1973-1995 Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher The Elections Centre Plymouth University The information contained in this report has been obtained from a number of sources. Election results from the immediate post-reorganisation period were painstakingly collected by Alan Willis largely, although not exclusively, from local newspaper reports. From the mid- 1980s onwards the results have been obtained from each local authority by the Elections Centre. The data are stored in a database designed by Lawrence Ware and maintained by Brian Cheal and others at Plymouth University. Despite our best efforts some information remains elusive whilst we accept that some errors are likely to remain. Notice of any mistakes should be sent to [email protected]. The results sequence can be kept up to date by purchasing copies of the annual Local Elections Handbook, details of which can be obtained by contacting the email address above. Front cover: the graph shows the distribution of percentage vote shares over the period covered by the results. The lines reflect the colours traditionally used by the three main parties. The grey line is the share obtained by Independent candidates while the purple line groups together the vote shares for all other parties. Rear cover: the top graph shows the percentage share of council seats for the main parties as well as those won by Independents and other parties. The lines take account of any by- election changes (but not those resulting from elected councillors switching party allegiance) as well as the transfers of seats during the main round of local election.
    [Show full text]
  • Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council
    7/4/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council Personal Details: Name: Cheryl Johnson E-mail: [email protected] Postcode: Organisation Name: Bournemouth Borough Council Comment text: I fully support these proposals. I have been a Councillor with Bournemouth Council since 2008 and I think these proposals would work very well for our town. Thank you. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/13340 1/1 7/4/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council Personal Details: Name: Cheryl Johnson E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: I support this proposal. It looks very sensible to me. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/13339 1/1 7/11/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council Personal Details: Name: Claire Bath E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Christchurch Borough Council Comment text: I like the revised proposals for the Christchurch wards. I have spent time looking at them and believe they are an improvement on the previous County Council ward boundaries. They reflect the communities and their cohesion and the things that give residents a commonality. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/13534 1/1 7/18/2018 Local Government Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council Personal Details: Name: Ron Parker E-mail: [email protected] Postcode: Organisation Name: Borough of Poole Comment text: I believe the BCP proposals for Parkstone and Oakdale wards better fit the community frame work than the commissions.Parkstone should have three councillor's.
    [Show full text]
  • Ratepayer Billing Address Property Address Rateable Value Property Description
    RATEPAYER BILLING ADDRESS PROPERTY ADDRESS RATEABLE VALUE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION A.S.T.R.A. 310 BOURNEMOUTH ROAD POOLE BH14 9AR GND FLR 19-25 HILL STREET POOLE BH15 1NR 9700 ABBOTS LTD-IN LIQUIDATION C/O PANOS ELIADES FRANKLIN & CO. OLYMPIA HOUSE ARMITAGE ROAD NW11 8RQ UNIT 12 BRANKSOME BUSINESS PARK BOURNE VALLEY ROAD POOLE BH12 1DW 19250 ADASTRAL MANAGEMENT CO LTD C/O BOURNE ESTATES LTD UNIT 4 BRANKSOME BUSINESS PARKBOURNE VALLEY ROAD BH12 1DW OFFICE DOWNLAND PLACE ADASTRAL ROAD POOLE DORSET BH17 8SA 2650 Offices ALBERT WAESCHLE LTD 11 BALENA CLOSE POOLE BH17 7DB 9 BALENA CLOSE POOLE DORSET BH17 7DB 9400 Warehouse ALL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL LTD UNIT 4 FLEETSBRIDGE BUS.CENTRE UPTON ROAD POOLE BH17 7AF 8 FLEETSBRIDGE BUSINESS CENTRE UPTON ROAD POOLE DORSET BH17 7AF 26250 Workshop ANKERS & RAWLINGS DEVELOPMENTS LTD 22 RINGWOOD ROAD LONGHAM FERNDOWN BH22 9AN UNIT 20 BRANKSOME BUSINESS PARK BOURNE VALLEY ROAD POOLE DORSET BH12 1DW 32000 ANKERS & RAWLINGS DEVELOPMENTS LTD 22 RINGWOOD ROAD LONGHAM FERNDOWN BH22 9AN SUITE 9 BRANKSOME PARK HOUSE BRANKSOME BUSINESS PARK BOURNE VALLEY ROAD POOLE BH12 1ED 17000 ANKERS & RAWLINGS DEVELOPMENTS LTD 22 RINGWOOD ROAD LONGHAM FERNDOWN BH22 9AN SUITE 12 BRANKSOME PARK HOUSE BRANKSOME BUSINESS PARK BOURNE VALLEY ROAD POOLE BH12 1ED 15250 ANKERS & RAWLINGS DIRECTORS PENSION PLAN 22 RINGWOOD ROAD LONGHAM FERNDOWN BH22 9AN UNIT 1 CONCEPT CENTRE INNOVATION CLOSE POOLE DORSET BH12 4QT 27500 ANKERS & RAWLINGS DIRECTORS PENSION PLAN 22 RINGWOOD ROAD LONGHAM FERNDOWN BH22 9AN UNIT 2 CONCEPT CENTRE INNOVATION CLOSE
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Parties and Individual Candidates Nominated
    European Parliamentary Election for the South West Region 22 May 2014 STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND INDIVIDUAL CANDIDATES NOMINATED 1. The following parties and individual candidates have been and stand nominated: An Independence from Europe David Smith Helen Webster Mike Camp Andrew Edwards Phil Dunn John Taverner 7 Herschell Road, Exeter EX4 5 Peel Row, Pinhoe Road, Flat 3 Willow House, Willow 25 Glebe Road, Southdown, Richmond, Broughton Hackett, 50B St Johns Road, Exeter, UK Independence Now 6LX Exeter EX4 8ET Way, Exeter EX4 8DY Bath BA2 1JB Worcs WR7 4BE Devon EX1 2HR Adrian Romilly Cliff Jones Arnold Brindle Wayne Peter Tomlinson Andrew Webster Giuseppe De Santis British National Party College House, 66 College 20 West Mount, Decoy, 37 Clifton Road, Billinge, 13 Cawdor House, Enfield 22 Redhill Drive, Bredbury, 34 Sylvan Avenue, Romford Avenue, Plymouth, Devon PL4 Newton Abbot, Devon TQ12 Because we can make Britain better Wigan WN5 7TP Close, Eccles M30 0QD Stockport SK6 2HF RM6 6BE 7AP 1DL Julie McCulloch Girling Ashley Peter Fox James Cracknell Georgina Susan Butler Sophie Swire Melissa Maynard Conservative Party The Knapp, Dovers Hill, 77 Park Grove, Bristol BS9 4 Chatsworth Road, Chiswick, 49 Sheen Road, Richmond- 1 Lennox Gardens Mews, 37 Anstey Road, Alton, Chipping Campden, For real change in Europe 4NY London W4 3HY upon-Thames TW9 1AJ London SW1X 0DP Hampshire GU34 2RD Gloucestershire GL55 6QX Clive Lavelle Alan England Mike Blundell Barbara Wright Steve Wright Ray Carr English Democrats 3 Rubens Court, Worle, Devondale, Carr
    [Show full text]