Challenges Faced by English Teachers in Remote
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Bungku-Tolaki Languages of South-Eastern Sulawesi, Indonesia
The Bungku-Tolaki languages of South-Eastern Sulawesi, Indonesia Mead, D.E. The Bungku-Tolaki languages of south-eastern Sulawesi, Indonesia. D-91, xi + 188 pages. Pacific Linguistics, The Australian National University, 1999. DOI:10.15144/PL-D91.cover ©1999 Pacific Linguistics and/or the author(s). Online edition licensed 2015 CC BY-SA 4.0, with permission of PL. A sealang.net/CRCL initiative. PACIFIC LINGUISTICS FOUNDING EDITOR: Stephen A. Wurm EDITORIAL BOARD: Malcolm D. Ross and Darrell T. Tryon (Managing Editors), John Bowden, Thomas E. Dutton, Andrew K. Pawley Pacific Linguistics is a publisher specialising in linguistic descriptions, dictionaries, atlases and other material on languages of the Pacific, the Philippines, Indonesia and Southeast Asia. The authors and editors of Pacific Linguistics publications are drawn from a wide range of institutions around the world. Pacific Linguistics is associated with the Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies at The Australian National University. Pacific Linguistics was established in 1963 through an initial grant from the Hunter Douglas Fund. It is a non-profit-making body financed largely from the sales of its books to libraries and individuals throughout the world, with some assistance from the School. The Editorial Board of Pacific Linguistics is made up of the academic staff of the School's Department of Linguistics. The Board also appoints a body of editorial advisors drawn from the international community of linguists. Publications in Series A, B and C and textbooks in Series D are refereed by scholars with relevant expertise who are normally not members of the editorial board. -
Mapping Indonesian Bajau Communities in Sulawesi
Mapping Indonesian Bajau Communities in Sulawesi by David Mead and Myung-young Lee with six maps prepared by Chris Neveux SIL International 2007 SIL Electronic Survey Report 2007-019, July 2007 Copyright © 2007 David Mead, Myung-young Lee, and SIL International All rights reserved 2 Contents Abstract 1 Background 2 Sources of data for the present study 3 Comparison of sources and resolution of discrepancies 3.1 North Sulawesi 3.2 Central Sulawesi 3.3 Southeast Sulawesi 3.4 South Sulawesi 4 Maps of Bajau communities in Sulawesi 5 The Bajau language in Sulawesi 5.1 Dialects 5.2 Language use and language vitality 5.3 Number of speakers Appendix 1: Table of Bajau communities in Sulawesi Appendix 2: Detailed comparisons of sources Appendix 3: Bajau wordlists from Sulawesi Published wordlists Unpublished wordlists References Works cited in this article An incomplete listing of some other publications having to do with the Bajau of Sulawesi 3 Mapping Indonesian Bajau Communities in Sulawesi Abstract The heart of this paper is a set of six maps, which together present a picture of the location of Indonesian Bajau communities throughout Sulawesi—the first truly new update since the language map of Adriani and Kruyt (1914). Instead of the roughly dozen locations which these authors presented, we can say that at present the Bajau live in more than one hundred fifty locations across Sulawesi. In order to develop this picture, we gleaned information from a number of other sources, most of which treated the Bajau only tangentially. 1 Background Two difficulties face the researcher who would locate where the Indonesian Bajau (hereafter simply ‘Bajau’)1 live across the island of Sulawesi. -
Languages of Indonesia (Sulawesi)
Ethnologue report for Indonesia (Sulawesi) Page 1 of 27 Languages of Indonesia (Sulawesi) See language map. Indonesia (Sulawesi). 14,111,444 (2000 census). 4 provinces. Information mainly from T. Sebeok 1971; J. C. Anceaux 1978; S. Kaseng 1978, ms. (1983); B. H. Bhurhanuddin ms. (1979); J. N. Sneddon 1983, 1989, 1993; C. E. and B. D. Grimes 1987; T. Friberg 1987; T. Friberg and T. Laskowske 1988; R. van den Berg 1988, 1996; M. Martens 1989; N. P. Himmelmann 1990; R. Blust 1991; Noorduyn 1991a; D. E. Mead 1998. The number of languages listed for Indonesia (Sulawesi) is 114. Of those, all are living languages. Living languages Andio [bzb] 1,700 (1991 SIL). Central Sulawesi, Banggai District, Lamala Subdistrict, eastern peninsula, Taugi and Tangeban villages. Alternate names: Masama, Andio'o, Imbao'o. Dialects: Related to Balantak, Saluan. Lexical similarity 44% with Bobongko, 62% with Coastal Saluan, 66% with Balantak. Classification: Austronesian, Malayo- Polynesian, Sulawesi, Saluan-Banggai, Western More information. Aralle- [atq] 12,000 (1984 SIL). South Sulawesi, Tabulahan Mambi Subdistrict, between Mandar and Kalumpang. Dialects: Aralle, Tabulahan, Mambi. Aralle has 84% to 89% lexical similarity with other dialects listed, 75% to 80% with dialects of Pitu Ulunna Salu, Pannei, Ulumandak. Classification: Austronesian, Malayo-Polynesian, Sulawesi, South Sulawesi, Northern, Pitu Ulunna Salu More information. Bada [bhz] 10,000 (1991 SIL). South central portion of central Sulawesi, in 14 villages of Lore Selatan Subdistrict, two mixed villages of Pamona Selatan Subdistrict, four mixed villages of Poso Pesisir Subdistrict, part of Lemusa village in Parigi Subdistrict, and Ampibabo Subdistrict. Ako village is in northern Mamuju District, Pasangkayu Subdistrict. -
(LDPC) of Sulawesi, Indonesia
Noorduyn, J., with René van den Berg. 1993. A language description progress chart (LDPC) of Sulawesi, Indonesia. Unpublished typescript, 15 pp. This unpublished paper is incomplete in places, and should be used accordingly. After the publication of J. Noorduyn’s 1991 A Critical Survey of Studies on the Languages of Sulawesi (Leiden: KITLV Press), the following year René van den Berg sketched out an idea for measuring progress in describing Sulawesi languages, and sent his notes to Noorduyn. Noorduyn enthusiastically adopted the idea, and in 1993 drafted the paper which here follows. Plans to develop the paper toward joint publication, however, were precluded by Noorduyn’s passing in April 1994. 1 A LANGUAGE DESCRIPTION PROGRESS CHART (LDPC) OF SULAWESI, INDONESIA 1. Introduction The vast territorial spread and huge number of the Austronesian languages demands an extraordinary effort of professional linguists to record and describe them exhaustively and suffi- ciently. The size of the task has perceptibly been recognized. The post WWII decades have witnessed a steady increase in specialists engaged in Austronesian language studies, carrying out primary research in the field or in-depth and comparative work in university centres. At the same time the professional understanding of language and the methods of linguistic re- search have vastly increased, and the possibilities for pu- blishing results of linguistic research have grown consider- ably. Accordingly, the number of publications concerning both well-known and newly discovered languages, micro- and macro- subgroups, and specific phenomena in this field of linguistic enterprise have also noticeably increased. The situation here briefly sketched requires that from time to time a stock-taking and evaluation take place of what has been achieved as well as what still remains undone. -
Print This Article
ISSN 2039-2117 (online) Mediterranean Journal of Vol 9 No 1 ISSN 2039-9340 (print) Social Sciences January 2018 Research Article © 2018 Hanna et.al.. This is an open access article licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). Language Kinship between Tulambatu and Tolaki Language in North Konawe Hanna Halu Ole University, Kendari Mursidin Haluoleo University, Kendari Siti Nur Rochmatul Jannah SMA I Oheo, North Konawe Doi: 10.2478/mjss-2018-0009 Abstract This study was intended to explore the genetic relationship between Tulambatu and Tolaki languages as members of Austronesian family language, particularly those included in the branch of Malay Polynesian sub-group. They have identical and similar lexis, phonetics, as well as corresponding phonemic and different phonemes. The aims of this study were: (1) to describe the level of genetic relationship between Tulambatu and Tolakinese languages in North Konawe regency, (2) to determine the period when the two languages were separated in terms of the basic vocabulary, (3) to predict the age of Tulambatu and Tolakinese languages in North Konawe regency. Data of the study were 200 vocabulary of Tulambatu and Tolakinese languages based on Swadesh lists that have been translated by native speakers of the two languages. The study was a historical comparative linguistics research and used the Lexicostatistics technique to find evidences that explain the genetic relationship of the languages. Based on the Lexicostatistics technique, it was found that the percentage of the vocabulary relationship of Tulambatu and Tolakinese languages was 52.02%. This proved that both languages are members of a sub-family of genetically similar languages (Astronesian Malayo Polinesian). -
2021 Daily Prayer Guide for All People Groups & LR-Upgs of Asia-Pacific
2021 Daily Prayer Guide for all People Groups & Least-Reached-UPGs of Asia-Pacific AGWM ed. Source: Joshua Project data, www.joshuaproject.net I give credit & thanks to Asia Harvest & Create International for permission to use their people group photos. 2021 Daily Prayer Guide for all People Groups & LR-UPGs of Asia-Pacific (China = separate region & DPG) ASIA-PACIFIC SUMMARY: 3,523 total PG; 830 FR & LR-UPG = Frontier & Least Reached-Unreached People Groups Downloaded from www.joshuaproject.net = August, 2020 LR-UPG defin: less than 2% Evangelical & less than 5% total Christian Frontier (FR) definition: 0% to 0.1% Christian Why pray--God loves lost: world UPGs = 7,407; Frontier = 5,042. Color code: green = begin new area; blue = begin new country "Prayer is not the only thing we can can do, but it is the most important thing we can do!" Luke 10:2, Jesus told them, "The harvest is plentiful, but the workers are few. Ask the Lord of the harvest, therefore, to send out workers into his harvest field." Let's dream God's dreams, and fulfill God's visions -- God dreams of all people groups knowing & loving Him! Revelation 7:9, "After this I looked and there before me was a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and in front of the Lamb." Why Should We Pray For Unreached People Groups? * Missions & salvation of all people is God's plan, God's will, God's heart, God's dream, Gen. 3:15! * In the Great Commissions Jesus commands us to reach all peoples in the world, Matt. -
0=AFRICAN Geosector
3= AUSTRONESIAN phylosector Observatoire Linguistique Linguasphere Observatory page 225 3=AUSTRONESIAN phylosector édition princeps foundation edition DU RÉPERTOIRE DE LA LINGUASPHÈRE 1999-2000 THE LINGUASPHERE REGISTER 1999-2000 publiée en ligne et mise à jour dès novembre 2012 published online & updated from November 2012 This phylosector covers 72 sets of languages (1,179 outer languages, comprising 3,182 inner languages) spoken by predominantly island-dwelling communities, located from the western Indian Ocean to the eastern Pacific and constituting the Austronesian intercontinental affinity. They extend more than half-way around the planet (eastwards from 43º E to 109º W; see note under phylozone 39=), and have also been associated with the languages of phylozone 47=Daic, within the "Austro-Tai" hypothesis. Zone 30= covers languages spoken on the island of Taiwan (Formosa), and zone 31= covers languages spoken by communities situated on most of the islands from the Philippines and the Celebes through Java, Southeast Asia (including Hainan island in China), Borneo and Sumatra to Madagascar: 30=TAIWANIC 31=HESPERONESIC Zones 32= to 39= cover languages spoken on most of the islands from the Nusa Tenggera archipelago through New Guinea and across the Pacific, as far as New Zealand / Aotearoa, French Polynesia and Hawaii: 32=MESONESIC 33=HALMAYAPENIC 34=NEOGUINEIC 35=MANUSIC 36=SOLOMONIC 37=KANAKIC 38=WESTPACIFIC 39=TRANSPACIFIC Before consulting the following tables, please see Guide to the Register in Volume One Les données supplémentaires -
3=AUSTRONESIAN Phylosector
3= AUSTRONESIAN phylosector Observatoire Linguistique Linguasphere Observatory page 225 3=AUSTRONESIAN phylosector This phylosector covers 72 sets of languages (1,179 outer languages, comprising 3,182 inner languages) spoken by predominantly island-dwelling communities, located from the western Indian Ocean to the eastern Pacific and constituting the Austronesian intercontinental affinity. They extend more than half-way around the planet (eastwards from 43º E to 109º W; see note under phylozone 39=), and have also been associated with the languages of phylozone 47=Daic, within the "Austro-Tai" hypothesis. Zone 30= covers languages spoken on the island of Taiwan (Formosa), and zone 31= covers languages spoken by communities situated on most of the islands from the Philippines and the Celebes through Java, Southeast Asia (including Hainan island in China), Borneo and Sumatra to Madagascar: 30=TAIWANIC 31=HESPERONESIC Zones 32= to 39= cover languages spoken on most of the islands from the Nusa Tenggera archipelago through New Guinea and across the Pacific, as far as New Zealand / Aotearoa, French Polynesia and Hawaii: 32=MESONESIC 33=HALMAYAPENIC 34=NEOGUINEIC 35=MANUSIC 36=SOLOMONIC 37=KANAKIC 38=WESTPACIFIC 39=TRANSPACIFIC ☛ Before consulting the following tables, please see Guide to the Register in Volume One Additional or improved data on languages and communities covered by this sector will be welcomed by e-mail at: [email protected], or by letter-post at: LINGUASPHERE PRESS, HEBRON SA34 0XT, WALES (UK). COLUMN 1 & 2 COLUMN 3 -
Managing Biosecurity Across Borders
Managing Biosecurity Across Borders Ian Falk • Ruth Wallace • Marthen L. Ndoen Editors Managing Biosecurity Across Borders Editors Ian Falk Ruth Wallace Charles Darwin University Charles Darwin University School of Education School of Education Ellengowan Drive Ellengowan Drive 0909 Darwin Northern Territory 0909 Darwin Northern Territory Australia Australia [email protected] [email protected] Marthen L. Ndoen Satya Wacana Christian University Economic Department and Post Graduate Development Studies Jl. Diponegoro 52–60, Salatiga 50711 Indonesia [email protected] ISBN 978-94-007-1411-3 e-ISBN 978-94-007-1412-0 DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-1412-0 Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York Library of Congress Control Number: 2011932494 © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) Foreword In this era of globalization, the prefix ‘bio’ is widely used in words such asbiotech - nology, biodiversity, biosafety, biosecurity, bioimperialism, biopiracy, biodemoc- racy, biocide and bioterrorism. New terms will no doubt continue to emerge. The emergence of these ‘bio’ words is a sign of the importance of biological resources in national development and in competition between nations. Nations that can effec- tively control and manage biological resources in a sustainable manner will survive and develop in this era of globalization. -
The Reconstruction of Protolanguage Muna and Kambowa
International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture Available online at https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/ijllc/ Vol. 2, No. 3, September 2016, pages: 151~168 ISSN: 2455-8028 https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/ijllc/article/view/127 The Reconstruction of Protolanguage Muna and Kambowa La Ino a Article history: Abstract This article is the result of research that talks about language Muna and Received: 9 July 2016 language Kambowa in the study of historical linguistics. This article has been Revised: 15 August 2016 shown in an international seminar in Padang with the theme of Language and Approved: 30 August 2016 civilization. But the text only contains a quantitative approach three languages: Published: 1 September 2016 the language Muna, language Kambowa, and language Busoa. The article will be devoted to the qualitative approach and reconstruction of proto-phonemes Keywords: and proto-words in two languages, the Muna language, and the kambowa language. This is done in order to find appropriate and accurate reconstruction. Muna; Data sought a more complete by adding data derived from previous writings. Historical; Muna language is the language used by the people in the district Muna and Kambowa; Kambowa language is the language used by the people in the north Buton Protolanguage; regency. The two districts in the province of Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia. Reconstruction; This research is done in the hope that the status of these two languages can be clearer. This is due to that during this time there is some presumption that both of these is the same language that sets it apart is the dialect. -
Language Kinship Between Tulambatu and Tolaki Language in North Konawe
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by MCSER Journals Online and Printed (Mediterranean Center of Social... ISSN 2039-2117 (online) Mediterranean Journal of Vol 9 No 1 ISSN 2039-9340 (print) Social Sciences January 2018 Research Article © 2018 Hanna et.al.. This is an open access article licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). Language Kinship between Tulambatu and Tolaki Language in North Konawe Hanna Halu Ole University, Kendari Mursidin Haluoleo University, Kendari Siti Nur Rochmatul Jannah SMA I Oheo, North Konawe Doi: 10.2478/mjss-2018-0009 Abstract This study was intended to explore the genetic relationship between Tulambatu and Tolaki languages as members of Austronesian family language, particularly those included in the branch of Malay Polynesian sub-group. They have identical and similar lexis, phonetics, as well as corresponding phonemic and different phonemes. The aims of this study were: (1) to describe the level of genetic relationship between Tulambatu and Tolakinese languages in North Konawe regency, (2) to determine the period when the two languages were separated in terms of the basic vocabulary, (3) to predict the age of Tulambatu and Tolakinese languages in North Konawe regency. Data of the study were 200 vocabulary of Tulambatu and Tolakinese languages based on Swadesh lists that have been translated by native speakers of the two languages. The study was a historical comparative linguistics research and used the Lexicostatistics technique to find evidences that explain the genetic relationship of the languages. -
Papers in Austronesian Linguistics No. 1
PACIFIC LINGUISTICS Series A - 81 PAPERS IN AUSTRONESIAN LINGUISTICS NO.1 edited by H. Steinhauer Department of Linguistics Research School of Pacific Studies THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNNERSITY Steinhauer, H. editor. Papers in Austronesian Linguistics No. 1. A-81, viii + 232 pages. Pacific Linguistics, The Australian National University, 1991. DOI:10.15144/PL-A81.cover ©1991 Pacific Linguistics and/or the author(s). Online edition licensed 2015 CC BY-SA 4.0, with permission of PL. A sealang.net/CRCL initiative. PACIFIC LINGUISTICS is issued through the Linguistic Circle of Canberra and consists of four series: SERIES A: Occasional Papers SERIES C: Books SERIES B: Monographs SERIES 0: Special Publications FOUNDING EDITOR: S.A. Wurm EDITORIAL BOARD: K.A. Adelaar, T.E. Dutton, A.K. Pawley, M.D. Ross, D.T. Tryon EDITORIAL ADVISERS: B.W. Bender K.A. McElhanon University of Hawaii Summer Institute of Linguistics David Bmdley H.P. McKaughan La Trobe University University of Hawaii Michael G. Clyne P. Muhlhliusler Monash University Bond University S.H. Elbert G.N. O'Grady University of Hawaii University of Victoria, B.C. K.l. Franklin K.L. Pike Summer Institute of Linguistics Summer Institute of Linguistics W.W. Glover E.C. Polome Summer Institute of Linguistics University of Texas G.W. Grace Gillian SankolT University of Hawaii University of Pennsylvania M.A.K. Halliday W.A.L. Stok hof University of Sydney University of Leiden E. Haugen B.K. T'sou Harvard University City Polytc<.:hnicof Hong Kong A. Healey E.M. Uhlenbcck Summer Institute of Linguisti<.:s University of Lciden L.A.