Comparative Analysis of Cosmetic Contact Lens Fitting By
Report of the Staff to the Federal Trade Commission A Comparative ~alysis of Cosmetic Coritact Lens Fitting by Ophtha1ffiologists, Optometrists, and Opticians .,... ... ---. ) by . Gary D. Hailey· Jonathan R. Bromberg Joseph P. Mulholland (Note: This report has been prepared by staff members of the Bureau of Consumer Protection and Bureau of Economics of the Federal Trade Commission. The Commission has reviewed the report and authorized its publication.) Acknowledgements The authors owe an enormous debt of gratitude to the many ophthalmologists, optometrists, and opticians wh~ assisted in the design and performance of this study out of a sense of responsi bility to their professions and to the public. Not all of them can be listed here. &ut the following individuals, who repre-. sen ted their respective professions at all stages of th~ study,' deserve special mention: Oliver H. Dabezies, Jr;, M.D., of the' Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmology and the American Academy of Ophthalmology; Earle L. Hunter, O.D., of the American Optometric Association; and Frank B. Sanning and Joseph W. Soper, of the Contact Lens Society of America and the Opticians Associa tion of America. Of course, none of these individuals or asso ciations necessarily endorses the ultimate conclusions of this report. A number ,of current and former FTC staff members have con tr ibuted to the study in important ways.· "'''Me-iribers of the Bureau of Consumer Protection's Impact Evaluation Unit, including Tom Maronick, Sandy Gleason,' Ron Stiff, Michael Sesnowitz, and Ken Bernhardt, helped answer innumerable technical questions related to the design and administration of the study. Christine Latsey, Elizabeth Hilder, Janis Klurfeld, Scott Klurfeld, Erica Summers, Matthew Daynard, Te~ry Latanich, and Gail Jensen interviewed study subjects, supervised the field examinat~ons, prepared data for analysis, wrote preliminary drafts, and helped with a number 6f 6ther ~asks.
[Show full text]