Curtin University of Technology School of Economics and Finance Working Paper Series 05:10
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Rejoinder to Tily Marc Lavoie*
A rejoinder to Tily Marc Lavoie* As everyone knows, Keynes’s General Theory has generated a lot of different interpretations. Geoff Tily presents a brief statement of his own understanding of it in his comment to my paper and he questions my perspective. There are also different strands of post-Keynesianism, as I have myself explained in a number of places. Tily is closest to what has been called Fundamentalist Post Keynesianism. Tily is annoyed at my use of the word pirouette when authors such as himself try to make a distinction between a given, a constant or an exogenous money supply.1†Besides this, I believe his main point is that the General Theory was all about liquidity preference, that Keynes was more concerned with monetary policy than fiscal policy and that he favoured a cheap money policy. A quote that often comes to my mind is Keynes’s (1936, p. 322) claim that “the remedy for the boom is not a higher rate of interest but a lower rate of interest!”. Thus I would certainly agree with Tily in this regard. But Keynes (1936, p. 320) also said that “there is, indeed, force in the argument that a high rate of interest is much more effective against a boom than a low rate of interest against a slump”, reinforcing the belief among many of us that monetary policy has limits that require the use of fiscal policy. Before the Great Recession and much before neoclassical Keynesians started relying on the interest rate zero-lower bound, post-Keynesians – among which Fazzari (1994-95), Galbraith (1994-95) and Arestis and Sawyer (2004) – have endorsed the relevance of fiscal policy at a time when mainstream economist were denying it. -
University Capture
THE AUSTRALIA INSTITUTE University Capture Australian universities and the fossil fuel industries Clive Hamilton and Christian Downie The Australia Institute Discussion Paper Number 95 June 2007 ISSN 1322-5421 ii © The Australia Institute This work is copyright. It may be reproduced in whole or in part for study or training purposes only with the written permission of the Australia Institute. Such use must not be for the purposes of sale or commercial exploitation. Subject to the Copyright Act 1968, reproduction, storage in a retrieval system or transmission in any form by any means of any part of the work other than for the purposes above is not permitted without written permission. Requests and inquiries should be directed to The Australia Institute. The Australia Institute iii Table of Contents Table of Contents iii Tables and Figures iv Acknowledgments v Summary vii 1. Introduction 2 1.1 Commercialisation of universities 2 1.2 Academic freedom 3 1.3 University capture 4 2. Involvement of fossil fuel companies in Australian universities 8 2.1 Fossil fuel industry associations 8 2.2 Fossil fuel companies 10 3. Three case studies 16 3.1 Introduction 16 3.2 The University of Queensland 16 3.3 The University of Western Australia 20 3.4 Curtin University of Technology 23 4. Conclusions 28 References 30 The Australia Institute iv Tables and Figures Table 1 Some examples of the revolving door between the fossil fuel 11 industries and university governance Table 2 Some fossil fuel sponsored academic positions at Australia 13 universities Figure 1 ACARP funding for research, in millions, 2000-2006 9 The Australia Institute v Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Professor Stuart Macintyre and Professor Simon Marginson for refereeing this paper. -
Universities Offering Advanced Standing
UNIVERSITIES OFFERING ADVANCED STANDING University of Ballarat Glasgow Caledonian University BUSINESS MANAGEMENT University of Canberra Heriot-Watt University University of South Australia King’s College London SINGAPORE University of Southern Queensland London Metropolitan University Nanyang Technological University University of Tasmania London South Bank University National University of Singapore University of Technology Sydney Loughborough University Singapore Institute of Technology University of the Sunshine Coast Manchester Metropolitan University Singapore Management University University of Western Sydney Middlesex University Singapore University of Social Sciences University of Wollongong Newcastle University Victoria University Northumbria University AUSTRALIA William Angliss Institute Nottingham Trent University Australian Maritime College Oxford Brookes University Blue Mountains International Hotel CANADA Queen Mary University of London Management School University of Lethbridge Richmond University Bond University Royal Holloway University of London Central Queensland University NEW ZEALAND Sheffield Hallam University Charles Darwin University Auckland University of Technology St Mary’s University College, Charles Sturt University Lincoln University Twickenham, London Curtin University of Technology The University of Auckland Staffordshire University Deakin University The University of Waikato Thames Valley University Edith Cowan University UNITEC New Zealand The University of Buckingham Flinders University University of -
Curtin Innovative Merit Scholarships
2015 CURTIN INNOVATIVE MERIT SCHOLARSHIPS Make tomorrow better. scholarships.curtin.edu.au Curtin University is the largest and most multicultural university in Western Australia. Over 50,000 students from FAST FACTS WHY CURTIN UNIVERSITY SYDNEY? more than 130 countries choose to study at Curtin, including • City centre location, study in downtown Sydney and over 17,200 international students—the third-largest make the most of this vibrant city. student population of any Australian university. Rated • Fast track options for all UG programs and certain among the world’s top 300 universities, Curtin is also one of PG programs. the top 50 universities under 50 years old and number one in • Small intimate campus environment giving Western Australia, as ranked by QS in 2012/2013. you more time with your lecturers and achieve We’re proud of our diverse student and staff population, academic excellence. making us one of the most popular university destinations • Internship programs available for all students enabling for international students in Australia. With campuses in our graduates to be career ready. Perth and Sydney we offer a wide range of choice to our • Benefit from great industry links and meet potential students. With a commitment of rewarding academic employers at our networking events. excellence around the world, our scholarships are one way we give a chance to students from many different nations to graduate career-ready in a global and competitive market. Curtin’s 2015 Curtin Innovative International Scholarships DID YOU KNOW? build on this tradition. The scholarships are open to: • future students seeking to study a Curtin bachelor or The 2015 Curtin Innovative International Scholarships master by coursework degree and support students from countries including: • current Curtin students intending to move to a different • Bangladesh • Kenya • South Africa course level (bachelor to master, for example). -
Heterodox Economics Newsletter Issue 210 — March 06, 2017 — Web1 — Pdf2 — Heterodox Economics Directory3
Heterodox Economics Newsletter Issue 210 | March 06, 2017 | web1 | pdf2 | Heterodox Economics Directory3 While many standard economists would argue that an increase in the intensity of compe- tition brings forth superior social outcomes, only few of them have noted that their own field - academic economics - exhibits tendencies running contrary to this claim. While it has not gone unnoticed that the conjoined forces of 'publish or perish' and a highly stratified academic culture in economics continuously intensify competitive pressures (an issue also addressed in my last editorial4 ), the effects of this increase in competitive pressure have only rarely been studied systemically. Luckily, a fine paper by Sarah Necker5 addresses this shortcoming and provides a first and preliminary glimpse on the coping strategies developed in academic economics. Here is a selective quote summarizing her findings: "About one fifth admits to having refrained from citing others' work that contradicted the own analysis [...]. Even more admit to questionable practices of data analysis (32{38%), e.g., the 'selective presentation of findings so that they confirm one's argument.' Having complied with suggestions from referees despite having thought that they were wrong is reported by 39% (CI: 34{44%). Even 59% (CI: 55{64%) report that they have at least once cited strategically to increase the prospect of publishing their work. According to their responses, 6.3% of the participants have never engaged in a practice rejected by at least a majority of peers." These ethical deficiencies stand in stark contrast to the increasing technical sophisticat- edness in empirical economics, especially because the latter might actually be exploited to achieve 'publishability' (an issue also touched upon in past editorials, e.g. -
Towards a Post-Keynesian Consensus in Macroeconomics: Reconciling the Cambridge and Wall Street Views
Towards a post-Keynesian consensus in macroeconomics: Reconciling the Cambridge and Wall Street views Marc Lavoie 1. Introduction The current financial crisis, which started to unfold in August 2007, is a reminder that macroeconomics cannot ignore financial relations, other- wise financial crises cannot be explained. Several authors have underlined the apparent tensions that have ex- isted between the so-called American Post Keynesians and the Cam- bridge Keynesians. The former, also known as the Fundamentalist post- Keynesians, are mainly concerned with money, debt, liquidity, interest Kommentar [TN1]: Author: If I under- stand your differentiation between the rates, and cash flow issues that characterised an uncertain world domi- American Post Keynesians and the British post-Keynesians right, and if you normally nated by financial markets. This also came to be known as Wall Street use “post-Keynesian”, this should read Keynesianism or Financial Keynesianism. By contrast the Cambridge either “fundamentalist post-Keynesians” or -- as a name -- “Fundamentalist Post Keynesians are associated with the Kaleckian and Kaldorian strands of Keynesians” or maybe – as in the conclu- sions – “fundamentalist Post Keynesians”. post-Keynesianism, along with the neo-Ricardian (or Sraffian) Keynesi- Could you please check? ans. The Cambridge Keynesians focussed on real issues, mainly through growth models, being concerned with technical choice, income distribu- tion, rates of capacity utilisation, pricing, normal and realised profit rates. Several observers have pointed out that they could see little homogeneity in the economic views and methods of these two broad groups of hetero- dox Keynesians. The purpose of the present paper is to show that while these differ- ences have certainly existed in the past, the potential for some reconcilia- tion between these two main views of the economy has always existed, and that some large efforts have been made over the last two decades to 76 Marc Lavoie effectively link the Cambridge and the Wall Street views. -
Groupes Sociaux Et Intervention Sociale
EXPLORATIONS IN MONETARY ECONOMICS ECO 6183 MARC LAVOIE FALL 2015 Course schedule: Wednesday 14:30 – 17:20 Course location : Social Sciences building 9003 Office : Social Sciences building 9054 Office hours : or by appointment Phone : 613 562-5800 (extension 1687) E-mail: [email protected] Website : http://www.socialsciences.uottawa.ca/eco/eng/profdetails.asp?id=64 OFFICIAL COURSE DESCRIPTION Explorations in theory, policy recommendations, and empirical study. Course material challenges traditional approaches by examining such topics as the endogeneity of money, the role of credit, financial instability, the circuit approach, flow-of-funds analysis, sectoral stock-flow coherence, and functional finance. GENERAL COURSE OBJECTIVES To demonstrate that there exists an alternative and coherent view of money and monetary economics which is distinct from the standard neoclassical framework: the post-Keynesian monetary theory; to understand what the major features of this alternative are; to understand the operational framework of the Bank of Canada as well as the clearing and settlement system; and to understand the implications of the subprime financial crisis for the operating procedures of central banks. A large section of the course will be devoted to making sure that the accounting of macroeconomic models is right. Every financial asset has a counterpart liability; and budget constraints for each sector describe how the balance between flows of expenditure, factor income and transfers generate counterpart changes in stocks of assets and liabilities. The accounts should be comprehensive in the sense that everything comes from somewhere and everything goes somewhere, or to put it more formally, all stocks and flows can be fitted into matrices in which columns and rows all sum to zero. -
Who Cares About Housing Anyway?
1 Curtin University of Technology School of Economics and Finance Working Paper Series 05:13 Who cares about housing anyway? by A. M. Dockery School of Economics and Finance, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth WA 6845 Ph. 61-8-92663350 Fax. 61-8-92663026 Email: [email protected] and N. Milsom ISSN 1035-901X ISBN 1 740673980 1 2 Who cares about housing anyway? A. M. Dockery and N. Milsom Curtin Business School, Curtin University of Technology Address for correspondence: Dr. Mike Dockery, Curtin Business School GPO Box U1987, Perth WA 6845 [email protected] Abstract To own your own home is popularly seen as the ‘great Australian dream’. Since the 1980s the proportion of median family income spent on housing has increased markedly. Some economists consider housing to be a prime example of conspicuous consumption – the tendency to spend on goods and service to signal social success or status. Clearly, housing is an intricate component of the socio-economic landscape. Previous literature has shown housing to be an important medium in connecting people to life’s opportunities. ‘Housing’ as it relates to the physical amenity of the building and neighbourhood can be distinguished from ‘the home’ which incorporates a sense of family and belonging, expresses values and provides a sphere of individual control. The home is important in meeting psychological needs and strongly influences young peoples’ later outcomes in life. However, research addressing the specific question of how important one’s own home is to different individuals and why is sparse from either an economic or psychological perspective. -
Dirk Ehnts, the Euro Zone Crisis: What Would John Maynard
Institute for International Political Economy Berlin The euro zone crisis: what would John Maynard do? Author: Dirk Ehnts Working Paper, No. 72/2016 Editors: Sigrid Betzelt Trevor Evans Eckhard Hein Hansjörg Herr Birgit Mahnkopf Christina Teipen Achim Truger Markus Wissen The euro zone crisis: what would John Maynard do? Dirk H. Ehnts Abstract: In his letter to US President Franklin D. Roosevelt Keynes (1933) wrote about „the technique of recovery itself‟. An increase in output is brought about by an increase in purchasing power, Keynes argues, which can come from three sectors: households, firms and government. Using the IS/MY macroeconomic model developed by Ehnts (2014), which features sectoral balances and endogenous money, the situation of some euro zone members is examined with a focus on the three techniques of recovery: increases in debt of the respective sectors as defined by Keynes. A fourth technique, an increase in spending by the rest of the world, is added. The conclusion is that the policy recommendation given by Keynes in his letter also holds for the euro zone at present: a rise in debt-financed government expenditure. Some reform at the institutional level in Europe would enable „the technique of recovery‟ to work via the TARGET2 payment system, which is organized along Keynes‟ International Clearing Union proposal and a solid foundation to build on. Keywords: deficit spending, fiscal policy, sectoral balances, Keynes, Keynesian economics JEL classification: E12, E32, E62 Contact: Dr. rer. pol. Dirk H. Ehnts Lecturer at Bard College Berlin Platanenstrasse 24 13156 Berlin Germany e-mail: [email protected] 1 1. -
Editor-In-Chief Naveen Donthu Georgia State University
Editor-in-Chief Naveen Donthu Anders Gustafsson Georgia State University, [email protected] Norwegian Business School, [email protected] Senior Editors Domingo Enrique Ribeiro-Soriano Hongwei He University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom Consumer behavior Associate Editors Kalpesh Desai, University of Missouri, [email protected] Claas Christian Germelmann, Universität Bayreuth, [email protected] Colleen Kirk, New York Institute of Technology, [email protected] Colleen Bee, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States Ashok Lalwani, Indiana University at Bloomington, [email protected] Hope Jensen Schau, The University of Arizona Eller College of Management, Tucson, Andrew Murphy, Massey University, [email protected] Arizona, United States Gopal Das, IIM Bangalore, [email protected] Lan Xia, Bentley University, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States Editorial Review Board Annika Abell Teresa Davis Adwait Khare Patricia Norberg Assistant Prof at Univ of Tennessee, Knoxvillea Sydney University Business School University of Texas (Arlington) Quinnipiac University Aaron Ahuvia Nathalie Dens Ann-Kristin Knapp Ulrich Orth University of Michigan Dearborn University of Antwerp University of Muenster University of Kiel Dana Alden Pierre Desmet Minkyung Koo Elfriede Penz University of Hawaii ESSEC Business School University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaignu Economics University of Vienna Nisreen Ameen Alexabder Fedorikhin Daniel Korschun Maria Piacentini -
The Monetary and Fiscal Nexus of Neo-Chartalism: a Friendly Critique
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ISSUES Vol. XLVII No. 1 March 2013 DOI 10.2753/JEI0021-3624470101 The Monetary and Fiscal Nexus of Neo-Chartalism: A Friendly Critique Marc Lavoie Abstract: A number of post-Keynesian authors, called the neo-chartalists, have argued that the government does not face a budget constraint similar to that of households and that government with sovereign currencies run no risk of default, even with high debt-to-GDP ratio. This stands in contrast to countries in the eurozone, where the central bank does not normally purchase sovereign debt. While these claims now seem to be accepted by some economists, neo-chartalists have also made a number of controversial claims, including that the government spends simply by crediting a private-sector-bank account at the central bank; that the government does need to borrow to deficit-spend; and that taxes do not finance government expenditures. This paper shows that these surprising statements do have some logic, once one assumes the consolidation of the government sector and the central bank into a unique entity, the state. The paper further argues, however, that these paradoxical claims end up being counter-productive since consolidation is counter-factual. Keywords: central bank, clearing and settlement system, eurozone, neo-chartalism JEL Classification Codes: B5, E5, E63 The global financial crisis has exposed the weaknesses of mainstream economics and it has given a boost to heterodox theories, in particular, Keynesian theories. The mainstream view about the irrelevance of fiscal activism has been strongly criticized by the active use of fiscal policy in the midst of the global financial crisis. -
Editorial Review Board
Editors Stephanie L. Knight, The Pennsylvania State University Gwendolyn M. Lloyd, The Pennsylvania State University Fran Arbaugh, The Pennsylvania State University Associate Editors David A. Gamson, The Pennsylvania State University James Nolan Jr., The Pennsylvania State University Scott P. McDonald, The Pennsylvania State University Anne Elrod Whitney, The Pennsylvania State University Managing Editor Iris M. Striedieck, The Pennsylvania State University AACTE Staff: Sharon P. Robinson, President and CEO AACTE Committee on Research and Dissemination: Chair: Jennie Whitcomb, University of Colorado at Boulder Board Liaison: Angela M. Sewall, University of Arkansas at Little Rock Jorgelina Abbate-Vaughn, University of Massachusetts, Boston Beverly Cross, University of Memphis George J. Petersen, California Lutheran University Mistilina Sato, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Marcy Singer-Gabella, Peabody College, Vanderbilt University Editorial Review Board Janet Alsup Barry Fraser Amanda Jansen Randi Stanulis Purdue University Curtin University (Australia) University of Delaware Michigan State University Audrey Amrein-Beardsley Alix Gallagher Stephanie Jones Jamy Stillman Arizona State University SRI International University of Georgia University of Southern California Tonya Bartell Gary R Galluzzo Peter Kloosterman Jeremy Stoddard Michigan State University George Mason University Indiana University William and Mary Amanda K Berry Kristen A Gansle Carol Stuessy Magdalene Lampert Monash University (Australia) Louisiana State University